Burn severity layers are thematic images depicting severity as unburned to low, low, moderate, high, and increased greenness (increased post-fire vegetation response). The layer may also have a sixth class representing a mask for clouds, shadows, large water bodies, or other features on the landscape that erroneously affect the severity classification. This data has been prepared as part of the Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) project. Due to the lack of comprehensive fire reporting information and quality Landsat imagery, burn severity for all targeted MTBS fires are not available. Additionally, the availability of burn severity data for fires occurring in the current and previous calendar year is variable since these data are currently in production and released on an intermittent basis by the MTBS project. Direct Download - https://www.mtbs.gov/direct-downloadMTBS Burn Area Boundary Full Metadata - https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/edw_resources/meta/S_USA.MTBS_BURN_AREA_BOUNDARY.xmlMTBS Fire Occurrence Point Full Metadata - https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/edw_resources/meta/S_USA.MTBS_FIRE_OCCURRENCE_PT.xmlFS Geodata Clearinghouse Downloads Page - https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?xmlKeyword=MTBS

The Travel Monitoring Analysis System (TMAS) - Volume dataset was compiled on December 31, 2023 and was published on July 16, 2024 from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). The TMAS data included in this table have been collected by the FHWA from State DOTs through (temporal data representing each time period) permanent count data. DOTs determine what volume data is reported for any given month or day within the month. Each record in the volume data for the reported site, direction or lane is for the given day of record (it contains all 24 hours of data). The attributes are used by FHWA for its Travel Monitoring Analysis System and external agencies and have been intentionally limited to location referencing attributes since the core station description attribute data are contained within TMAS. The attributes in the Volume data correspond with the Volume file format found in Chapter 6 of the 2001 Traffic Monitoring Guide (https://doi.org/10.21949/1519109).

Hourly air quality data provided for various dashboards based on hourly averages of qualified raw values from the various air quality censors.The table shown below includes the common names for each of the stations as well as the pod and serial numbers assigned by the manufacturer.
Dallas Station Name Pod Number Pod Serial Number

Larry Johnson Recreation Center Monitor 2977 2450952

Mill Creek Batch Plant Monitor 2978 2450953

South Central Park (Joppa Neighborhood) Monitor 2979 2450954

West Dallas Multipurpose Center Monitor 2983 2450958

Polk Recreation Center Monitor 3020 2450995

Water Quality Monitoring Site identifies locations across the state of Vermont where water quality data has been collected, including habitat, chemistry, fish and/or macroinvertebrates. Currently the layer is not maintained as site locations are provided through another means to the ANR Natural Resources Atlas.

NOTE: An updated Introduction to ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Tutorial is available here. It is recommended you use the new tutorial for getting started with GeoEvent Server. The old Introduction Tutorial available on this page is relevant for 10.8.x and earlier and will not be updated.The Introduction to GeoEvent Server Tutorial (10.8.x and earlier) introduces you to the Real-Time Visualization and Analytic capabilities of ArcGIS GeoEvent Server. GeoEvent Server allows you to:

Incorporate real-time data feeds in your existing GIS data and IT infrastructure. Perform continuous processing and analysis on streaming data, as it is received. Produce new streams of data that can be leveraged across the ArcGIS system.

Once you have completed the exercises in this tutorial you should be able to:

Use ArcGIS GeoEvent Manager to monitor and perform administrative tasks. Create and maintain GeoEvent Service elements such as inputs, outputs, and processors. Use GeoEvent Simulator to simulate event data into GeoEvent Server. Configure GeoEvent Services to append and update features in a published feature service. Work with processors and filters to enhance and direct GeoEvents from event data.

The knowledge gained from this tutorial will prepare you for other GeoEvent Server tutorials available in the ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Gallery.

Releases

Each release contains a tutorial compatible with the version of GeoEvent Server listed. The release of the component you deploy does not have to match your version of ArcGIS GeoEvent Server, so long as the release of the component is compatible with the version of GeoEvent Server you are using. For example, if the release contains a tutorial for version 10.6; this tutorial is compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.6 and later. Each release contains a Release History document with a compatibility table that illustrates which versions of ArcGIS GeoEvent Server the component is compatible with.

NOTE: The release strategy for ArcGIS GeoEvent Server components delivered in the ArcGIS GeoEvent Server Gallery has been updated. Going forward, a new release will only be created when

  a component has an issue,
  is being enhanced with new capabilities,
  or is not compatible with newer versions of ArcGIS GeoEvent Server.

This strategy makes upgrades of these custom
components easier since you will not have to
upgrade them for every version of ArcGIS GeoEvent Server
unless there is a new release of
the component. The documentation for the
latest release has been
updated and includes instructions for updating
your configuration to align with this strategy.

Latest

Release 7 - March 30, 2018 - Compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.6 and later.

Previous

Release 6 - January 12, 2018 - Compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.5 thru 10.8.

Release 5 - July 30, 2016 - Compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.4 thru 10.8.

Release 4 - July 30, 2015 - Compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.3.x.

Release 3 - April 24, 2015 - Compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.3.x. Not available.

Release 2 - January 22, 2015 - Compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.3.x. Not available.

Release 1 - April 11, 2014 - Compatible with ArcGIS GeoEvent Server 10.2.x.

This feature class is updated every business day using Python scripts and the WellNet database. Please disregard the "Date Updated" field as it does not keep in sync with DWR's internal enterprise geodatabase updates. The NDWR's water monitoring database contains information related to sites for groundwater measurements. These data are used by NDWR to assess the condition of the groundwater and surface water systems over time and are available to the public on NDWR’s website. Groundwater measurement sites are chosen based on physical location and access considerations, permit terms, and to maximize the distribution of measurement points in a given basin.Groundwater monitoring sites are typically chosen based on spatial location, access, and period of record considerations. When possible NDWR tries to have a distribution of monitoring locations within a given hydrographic area. The entity who does the monitoring depends on the site – for example, some mines have well fields where they collect data and submit those data to NDWR as a condition of their monitoring plan – and some sites are monitored by NDWR staff annually or more frequently. While people can volunteer to have their well monitored, more often the NDWR staff who measure water levels recommend an additional site or staff in the office recommend alternate sites. The Chief of the Hydrology Section will review the recommendations and make a final decision on adding/changing a site. This dataset is updated every business day from a non-spatial SQL Server database using lat/long coordinates to display location. This feature class participates in a relationship class with a groundwater measure table joined using the sitename field. This dataset contains both active and inactive sites. Measurement data is provided by reporting agencies and by regular site visits from NDWR staff. For website access, please see the Water Levels site at water.nv.gov/WaterLevelData.aspx

This GIS dataset contains points which depict air quality monitors within EPA's Air Quality System (AQS) monitoring network. This dataset is updated weekly to reflect the most recent changes in the monitoring network. The monitors are generally operated by State, local, and tribal air pollution control agencies using procedures specified by the U.S. EPA. These agencies collect the data, quality assure it, and then submit it to the EPA Air Quality System (AQS). The GIS dataset includes monitor information and links to download historic air quality data at each monitor.

This dashboard monitors the latest earthquake events around the world. It automatically updates when new events come in to show you where they occurred, how significant they were, and if any there were any resulting tsunamis. The real-time earthquake data, provided by the Living Atlas, was used to create a web map that was then used in this dashboard.To learn about the creation of this dashboard, read the blog: Making an Auto-Focusing Real-Time Dashboard. Feel free to make a copy and see how it is configured.

This dataset contains data used to test the protocol for high-resolution mapping and monitoring of recreational impacts in protected natural areas (PNAs) using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) surveys, Structure-from-Motion (SfM) data processing and geographic information systems (GIS) analysis to derive spatially coherent information about trail conditions (Tomczyk et al., 2023). Dataset includes the following folders:

Cocora_raster_data (~3GB) and Vinicunca_raster_data (~32GB) - a very high-resolution (cm-scale) dataset derived from UAV-generated images. Data covers selected recreational trails in Colombia (Valle de Cocora) and Peru (Vinicunca). UAV-captured images were processed using the structure-from-motion approach in Agisoft Metashape software. Data are available as GeoTIFF files in the UTM projected coordinate system (UTM 18N for Colombia, UTM 19S for Peru). Individual files are named as follows [location]_[year]_[product]_[raster cell size].tif, where:

[location] is the place of data collection (e.g., Cocora, Vinicucna)

[year] is the year of data collection (e.g., 2023)

[product] is the tape of files: DEM = digital elevation model; ortho = orthomosaic; hs = hillshade

[raster cell size] is the dimension of individual raster cell in mm (e.g., 15mm)

Cocora_vector_data. and Vinicunca_vector_data – mapping of trail tread and conditions in GIS environment (ArcPro). Data are available as shp files. Data are in the UTM projected coordinate system (UTM 18N for Colombia, UTM 19S for Peru).

Structure-from-motio n processing was performed in Agisoft Metashape (https://www.agisoft.com/, Agisoft, 2023). Mapping was performed in ArcGIS Pro (https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/about-arcgis/overview, Esri, 2022). Data can be used in any GIS software, including commercial (e.g. ArcGIS) or open source (e.g. QGIS).

Tomczyk, A. M., Ewertowski, M. W., Creany, N., Monz, C. A., & Ancin-Murguzur, F. J. (2023). The application of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) surveys and GIS to the analysis and monitoring of recreational trail conditions. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 103474. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2023.103474

[Metadata] Description: This data shows the location of air quality monitoring sites used by the Hawaii Department of Health, as of April 2025.

Statistical analyses and maps representing mean, high, and low water-level conditions in the surface water and groundwater of Miami-Dade County were made by the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Miami-Dade County Department of Regulatory and Economic Resources, to help inform decisions necessary for urban planning and development. Sixteen maps were created that show contours of (1) the mean of daily water levels at each site during October and May for the 2000-2009 water years; (2) the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of the daily water levels at each site during October and May and for all months during 2000-2009; and (3) the differences between mean October and May water levels, as well as the differences in the percentiles of water levels for all months, between 1990-1999 and 2000-2009. The 80th, 90th, and 96th percentiles of the annual maximums of daily groundwater levels during 1974-2009 (a 35-year period) were computed to provide an indication of unusually high groundwater-level conditions. These maps and statistics provide a generalized understanding of the variations of water levels in the aquifer, rather than a survey of concurrent water levels. Water-level measurements from 473 sites in Miami-Dade County and surrounding counties were analyzed to generate statistical analyses. The monitored water levels included surface-water levels in canals and wetland areas and groundwater levels in the Biscayne aquifer. Maps were created by importing site coordinates, summary water-level statistics, and completeness of record statistics into a geographic information system, and by interpolating between water levels at monitoring sites in the canals and water levels along the coastline. Raster surfaces were created from these data by using the triangular irregular network interpolation method. The raster surfaces were contoured by using geographic information system software. These contours were imprecise in some areas because the software could not fully evaluate the hydrology given available information; therefore, contours were manually modified where necessary. The ability to evaluate differences in water levels between 1990-1999 and 2000-2009 is limited in some areas because most of the monitoring sites did not have 80 percent complete records for one or both of these periods. The quality of the analyses was limited by (1) deficiencies in spatial coverage; (2) the combination of pre- and post-construction water levels in areas where canals, levees, retention basins, detention basins, or water-control structures were installed or removed; (3) an inability to address the potential effects of the vertical hydraulic head gradient on water levels in wells of different depths; and (4) an inability to correct for the differences between daily water-level statistics. Contours are dashed in areas where the locations of contours have been approximated because of the uncertainty caused by these limitations. Although the ability of the maps to depict differences in water levels between 1990-1999 and 2000-2009 was limited by missing data, results indicate that near the coast water levels were generally higher in May during 2000-2009 than during 1990-1999; and that inland water levels were generally lower during 2000-2009 than during 1990-1999. Generally, the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of water levels from all months were also higher near the coast and lower inland during 2000–2009 than during 1990-1999. Mean October water levels during 2000-2009 were generally higher than during 1990-1999 in much of western Miami-Dade County, but were lower in a large part of eastern Miami-Dade County.

At the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a new effort is under way to assist states in creating or enhancing localized COVID-19 dashboards and maps for the public. This effort with states has an external focus, aiming to help the them deliver data to residents, civic leaders, and public health administrators. Armed with this information, states and localities will be better equipped to monitor the impacts and mitigate risks, and federal resources can go where they are needed most, because everyone will be working from the same data._Communities around the world are taking strides in mitigating the threat that COVID-19 (coronavirus) poses. Geography and location analysis have a crucial role in better understanding this evolving pandemic.When you need help quickly, Esri can provide data, software, configurable applications, and technical support for your emergency GIS operations. Use GIS to rapidly access and visualize mission-critical information. Get the information you need quickly, in a way that’s easy to understand, to make better decisions during a crisis.Esri’s Disaster Response Program (DRP) assists with disasters worldwide as part of our corporate citizenship. We support response and relief efforts with GIS technology and expertise.More information...

The Travel Monitoring Analysis System (TMAS) - Stations Table dataset was created from data collected during 2021 and was published on April 12, 2022 from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). The data included in this table have been collected by the FHWA from State DOTs through 24/7 permanent count data. The attributes are used by FHWA for its Travel Monitoring and Analysis System and by State DOTs and have been intentionally limited to location referencing attributes since the core station description attribute data are contained within the Station Description Tables (SDT). The attributes in the Station Description Table correspond with the Station Description Record found in Chapter 6 of the 2001 Traffic Monitoring Guide (https://doi.org/10.21949/1519109). This table was derived from files provided by FHWA.

ArcGIS Dashboards useful links (GeoNet). ArcGIS Dashboards is a configurable web app that provides location-aware data visualization and analytics for a real-time operational view of people, services, assets, and events. You can monitor the activities and key performance indicators that are vital to meeting your organization’s objectives within a dynamic dashboard._Communities around the world are taking strides in mitigating the threat that COVID-19 (coronavirus) poses. Geography and location analysis have a crucial role in better understanding this evolving pandemic.When you need help quickly, Esri can provide data, software, configurable applications, and technical support for your emergency GIS operations. Use GIS to rapidly access and visualize mission-critical information. Get the information you need quickly, in a way that’s easy to understand, to make better decisions during a crisis.Esri’s Disaster Response Program (DRP) assists with disasters worldwide as part of our corporate citizenship. We support response and relief efforts with GIS technology and expertise.More information...Edi

For further information about air quality monitoring - see the City of York Council website

A point feature class of Air Monitor Stations with E-Sciences.

Progress photo that was taken of an air quality monitor. Photo was taken by the Office of Environmental Quality & Sustainability.

NOTE: This dataset is an older dataset that we have removed from the SGID and 'shelved' in ArcGIS Online. There may (or may not) be a newer vintage of this dataset in the SGID.This data set represents lake water qality monitoring sites based on the generation of points from latitude, longitude coordinates furnished by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality, Division of Water Quality (DWQ).

Active monitors in the air quality monitoring system regulated by the TCEQ.

The Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) Program assesses the frequency, extent, and magnitude (size and severity) of all large wildland fires (including wildfires and prescribed fires) in the conterminous United States (CONUS), Alaska, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico from the beginning of the Landsat Thematic Mapper archive to the present. All fires reported as greater than 1,000 acres in the western U.S. and greater than 500 acres in the eastern U.S. are mapped across all ownerships. MTBS produces a series of geospatial and tabular data for analysis at a range of spatial, temporal, and thematic scales and are intended to meet a variety of information needs that require consistent data about fire effects through space and time. This map layer is a vector polygon shapefile of the location of all currently inventoried fires occurring between calendar year 1984 and the current MTBS release for CONUS, Alaska, Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Please visit https://mtbs.gov/announcements to determine the current release. Fires omitted from this mapped inventory are those where suitable satellite imagery was not available or fires were not discernable from available imagery.