-- DEMO Version v0.5--***Updated to include Errors Identified in the Split line feature class tool***Introducing the Address Management Solution - an ArcGIS Pro Desktop Application Template designed to revolutionize your address data management process!With this ArcGIS Pro Project template, you can efficiently create and manage address points and road centerlines, ensuring data accuracy and completeness. Powered by custom attribute rules, data creation becomes a breeze, automatically populating mandatory fields for seamless data integration.Key Features:Address Points: Easily create new address points with attribute rules that automate the generation of related attributes for comprehensive data.Road Centerlines: Benefit from attribute rules that streamline data editing, simplifying the process of splitting and recalculating address ranges for accurate data maintenance.NG911 Ready: Align your data with the NENA GIS Data Model and National standards, ensuring compatibility and efficient integration with Next Generation 9-1-1 services.User-Friendly: The template comes with targeted training modules, guiding users through introductory, advanced, and master levels to master ArcGIS Pro's powerful address management capabilities.Statewide Dataset: Leverage our comprehensive state-wide datasets, custom domains, and dynamic labels, tailored to cater to Arizona's geographic requirements.Empower your team with the tools and knowledge needed to succeed in creating a more resilient, efficient, and reliable address management system. Download the Desktop Application Template and review the Training Materials to get started!

Exemption Notices (EXs) of Timber Operations accepted by the California Department of Forestry & Fire Protection. Operations are exempt from the plan preparation and submission requirements of PRC § 4581, and may be exempt from the completion report and stocking report requirements (PRC §§ 4585 and 4587) of the Forest Practice Act. Public Utility and other Right-of-Way Exemptions are not included. See CAL FIRE Exemption Notices Right-of-Way for this data. Data set includes current year plus two preceding years. For previous years see data set CAL FIRE Exemption Notices Historical. To learn more about Exemptions, refer to 14 CCR §§ 1038 and 1104.1(a) in the California Forest Practice Rules. Exemption Notices are subject to the rules of the year in which they were submitted. Examples of exemptions that are collected include: Christmas Tree, Dead, Dying, and Diseased, Drought Mortality, 150ft or 300ft Fire Hazard Trees removal, Forest Fire Prevention, Fuelwood split product, Less than three acre conversions, and Substantially Damaged Timberland, Post Fire Recovery. Link to the California Forest Practice Rules: https://bof.fire.ca.gov/regulations/bills-statutes-rules-and-annual-california-forest-practice-rules

Street cut moratoriums are established through the City of Tacoma Rights-of-Way Restoration Policy which authorizes five-year pavement cut moratoriums on newly constructed roadways and provides specific requirements for performing restoration within City rights-of-way. The policy provides a systematic approach to restore infrastructure, improve performance of street and sidewalk restorations, limit accelerated infrastructure degradation, protect infrastructure investment and reduce future maintenance costs.For more information on capital project construction projects within the City of Tacoma, see the Tacoma Streets Initative site.

The MaineDOT Roadway Context Classification information will be used to adapt transportation decisions,. Using this context information along with roadway function will determine which road user needs should be prioritized. Context data will be used in MaineDOT's new speed limit setting procedure as well as in a new project scoping process connected to the Complete Streets Policy.The map is split into 5 context classifications which make up MaineDOT's classification system. A color key is described below:Red - UrbanOrange - SuburbanDark Blue - VillageGreen - Rural TownWhite - RuralThere are actually have many different criteria that can lead to classification. This detail was necessary to refine the map. You can check on and off the different criteria on the left to see how it impacts the map if you would like.These context classifications will be explained further on the MaineDOT website. This map was created using statewide automated data processing, an automated smoothing process, then corrected through manual review.The data used to make this map includes:Building Density (Area-wide and Close to the Road)Building Area Density (Area-wide and Close to the Road)Intersection Density (Area-wide)Segment Density (Area-wide)Driveway Density (Individual Street)State Urban Compact AreasMPO Planning AreasFor more information about this roadway context data, contact MaineDOT Planning.

This map shows the intersection of two datasets: American Community Survey (ACS) figures for households without broadband internet, and FCC Census blocks without at least 25 mbps download and 3 mbps upload speeds. Areas with under 25/3 are considered unserved in regards to the digital divide. Cellular towers (provided by HIFLID) are also included on the map to highlight where infrastructure could potentially help underserved populations in the US.In this map, Census blocks that are unserved are highlighted in the map. This is done by using a Destination Atop Blend mode against the Census tract pattern. This allows us to see the tract pattern, but focused on the blocks with broadband levels below the FCC acceptable rate of 25mbps download/3mbps upload. About the data: Cellular TowersThis Homeland Infrastructure Foundation-Level Data (HIFLD) feature layer depicts cellular towers in the United States, with an added Placekey to enable enrichment with other datasets. Per Techopedia, a cellular tower "houses the electronic communications equipment along with an antenna to support cellular communication in a network. A cellular tower is usually an elevated structure with the antenna, transmitters and receivers located at the top." This is a variation of the Cellular Towers layer published by the Federal_User_Community account.FCC Form 477 This summarizes the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Form 477, data by transmission technology used and speeds offered at various geography levels.FCC Staff Block EstimatesFixed Broadband Deployment Data from FCC Form 477American Community Survey (ACS) Table B28001This layer shows computer ownership and type of internet subscription. This is shown by tract, county, and state boundaries. This service is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis.

All organisations hold information about the core of their business. The Forestry Commission holds information on trees and forests. We use this information to help us run our business and make decisions. The role of the Forest Inventory (the Sub-compartment Database (SCDB) and the stock maps) is to be our authoritative data source, giving us information for recording, monitoring, analysis and reporting. Through this it supports decision-making on the whole of the FC estate. Information from the Inventory is used by the FC, wider government, industry and the public for economic, environmental and social forest-related decision-making. Furthermore, it supports forestrelated national policy development and government initiatives, and helps us meet our national and international forest-related reporting responsibilities. Information on our current forest resource, and the future expansion and availability of wood products from our forests, is vital for planners both in and outside the FC. It is used when looking at the development of processing industries, regional infrastructure, the effect upon communities of our actions, and to prepare and monitor government policies. The Inventory (SCDB and stock maps), with ‘Future Forest Structure’ and the ‘rollback’ functionality of Forester, will help provide a definitive measure of trends in extent, structure, composition, health, status, use, and management of all FC land holdings. We require this to meet national and international commitments, to report on the sustainable management of forests as well as to help us through the process of business and Forest Design Planning. As well as helping with the above, the SCDB helps us address detailed requests from industry, government, non-government organisations and the public for information on our estate. The FC’s growing national and international responsibilities and the requirements for monitoring and reporting on a range of forest statistics have highlighted the technical challenges we face in providing consistent, national level data. A well kept and managed SCDB and GIS (Geographical Information System - Forester) will provide the best solution for this and assist Countries in evidence-based policy making. Looking ahead at international reporting commitments; one example of an area where requirements look set to increase will be reporting on our work to combat climate change and how our estate contributes to carbon sequestration. We have put in place processes to ensure that at least the basics of our inventory are covered: 1. The inventory of forests; 2. The land-uses; 3. The land we own ( Deeds); 4. The roads we manage. We depend on others to allow us to manage the forests and to provide us with funds and in doing so we need to be seen to be responsible and accountable for our actions. A foundation of achieving this is good record keeping. A sub compartment should be recognisable on the ground. It will be similar enough in land use, species or habitat composition, yield class, age, condition, thinning history etc. to be treated as a single unit. They will generally be contiguous in nature and will not be split by roads, rivers, open space etc. Distinct boundaries are required, and these will often change as crops are felled, thinned, replanted and resurveyed. In some parts of the country foresters used historical and topographical features to delineate sub-compartment boundaries, such as hedges, walls and escarpments. In other areas no account of the history and topography of the site was taken, with field boundaries, hedges, walls, streams etc. being subsumed into the sub-compartment. Also, these features may or may not appear on the OS backdrop, again this was dependent on the staff involved and what they felt was relevant to the map. The main point is that, as managers we may find such obvious features in the middle of a sub-compartment when nothing is indicated on the stock map, while the same thing would be indicated elsewhere. Attributes; FOREST Cost centre Nos. COMPTMENT Compartemnt Nos. SUBCOMPT Sub-compartment letter SUBCOMPTID Unique identifier BLOCK Block nos. CULTCODE Cultivation Code CULTIVATN Cultivation PRIHABCODE Primary Habitat Code PRIHABITAT Primary Habitat PRILANDUSE Land Use of primary component PRISPECIES Primary component tree species PRI_PLYEAR prim. component year planted PRIPCTAREA Prim. component %Area of sub-compartment SECHABCODE Secondary Habitat Code SECHABITAT Secondary Habitat SECLANDUSE Land Use of secondary component SECSPECIES Secondary component tree species SEC_PLYEAR Secondary component year planted SECPCTAREA Secondary component %Area of sub-compartment TERLANDUSE Land Use of tertiary component TERSPECIES Tertiary component tree species TER_PLYEAR Tertiary component year planted TERPCTAREA Tertiary component %Area of sub-compartment TERHABITAT Tertiary Habitat TERHABCODE Tertiary Habitat Code

This dataset has now been replaced by the National Coastal Erosion Risk Mapping (NCERM) - National (2024) Medium Term SMP PolicyWe have symbolised this layer to highlight the Medium Term Shoreline Management Plan Policy.The National Coastal Erosion Risk shows the coastal baseline. This baseline is split to ‘frontages’. These are defined as lengths of coast with consistent characteristics based on the cliff behaviour characteristics and the defence characteristics. It is intended as an up-to-date and reliable benchmark dataset showing erosion extents and rates for three periods:• Short Term (0 – 20yr)• Medium Term (20 – 50yr)• Long Term (50 – 100yr). For the 5th, 50th and 95th percentile confidence levels for (All distances are cumulative over time and given in metres):• No Active Intervention Policy Scenario• With the implementation of Shoreline Management Plan 2 Policies. Defence type and SMP policies for each of the three periods described above are included. INFORMATION WARNINGS: 1. The data and associated information is intended for guidance - it cannot provide details for individual properties. The NCERM information considers the predominant risk at the coast, although flooding and erosion processes are often linked, and data on erosion of foreshore features are, in general, not included. 2. The data describes the upper and lower estimates of erosion risk at a particular location, within which the actual location of the coastline is expected to lie. The data does not estimate the absolute location of the future coastline. Details of geologically complex areas, known as "complex cliffs" are, in general, not included within the dataset due to the inherent uncertainties associated with predicting the timing and extent of erosion at these locations. This dataset succeeds National Coastal Erosion Risk Mapping (NCERM) - National (2012 - 2017)