First, we would like to thank the wildland fire advisory group. Their wisdom and guidance helped us build the dataset as it currently exists. Currently, there are multiple, freely available fire datasets that identify wildfire and prescribed fire burned areas across the United States. However, these datasets are all limited in some way. Their time periods could cover only a couple of decades or they may have stopped collecting data many years ago. Their spatial footprints may be limited to a specific geographic area or agency. Their attribute data may be limited to nothing more than a polygon and a year. None of the existing datasets provides a comprehensive picture of fires that have burned throughout the last few centuries. Our dataset uses these existing layers and utilizes a series of both manual processes and ArcGIS Python (arcpy) scripts to merge these existing datasets into a single dataset that encompasses the known wildfires and prescribed fires within the United States and certain territories. Forty different fire layers were utilized in this dataset. First, these datasets were ranked by order of observed quality (Tiers). The datasets were given a common set of attribute fields and as many of these fields were populated as possible within each dataset. All fire layers were then merged together (the merged dataset) by their common attributes to created a merged dataset containing all fire polygons. Polygons were then processed in order of Tier (1-8) so that overlapping polygons in the same year and Tier were dissolved together. Overlapping polygons in subsequent Tiers were removed from the dataset. Attributes from the original datasets of all intersecting polygons in the same year across all Tiers were also merged so that all attributes from all Tiers were included, but only the polygons from the highest ranking Tier were dissolved to form the fire polygon. The resulting product (the combined dataset) has only one fire per year in a given area with one set of attributes. While it combines wildfire data from 40 wildfire layers and therefore has more complete information on wildfires than the datasets that went into it, this dataset has also has its own set of limitations. Please see the Data Quality attributes within the metadata record for additional information on this dataset's limitations. Overall, we believe this dataset is designed be to a comprehensive collection of fire boundaries within the United States and provides a more thorough and complete picture of fires across the United States when compared to the datasets that went into it.

GIS shape files including spatial and morphometric data of pingos in the western Canadian Arctic and accompanying Excel spreadsheet summarizing metrics for pingos of differing height categories. Within ArcGIS®, the pingo database of Wolfe et al. (2021) and HRDEM (Natural Resources Canada, 2020) were used to determine pingo metrics, including top and base elevations, planimetric (“footprint”) area, slope, surface area, ratio of the surface area to base area (i.e., surface ratio), and volume. Pingos were seperated into categories of <0.6 m high, for which no additional metrics were calculated, and pingos >0.6 to 2.0 m, and >2.0 m high. Metrics were determined with use of custom algorithm implemented as a Python script utilizing the ArcPy library and DEM Surface Tools extension (Jenness, 2010) for ArcGIS® DesktopTM 10.7.1. Detailed methodology may be found in the accompanying paper.

Citation

In order to use these data, you must cite this data set with the following citation: Wolfe, Stephen; Morse, Peter; Parker, Ryan; Phillips, Marcus (2023), “Distribution and morphometry of pingos, western Canadian Arctic, Northwest Territories, Canada: Datasets and Supplementary Materials”, Mendeley Data, V1, doi: 10.17632/kgbsjvrj32.1

Reason for Selection This indicator represents aquatic connectivity between fresh and salt water in Atlantic drainages. It incorporates both physical barriers to connectivity and indirect barriers related to habitat quality. It also promotes consistency with the priorities of the Atlantic Coast Fish Habitat Partnership. Input Data

Atlantic Coast Fish Habitat Partnership (ACFHP) Fish Habitat Conservation Area Mapping and Prioritization Project: South Atlantic and Mid-Atlantic Diadromous Analysis
Base Blueprint 2022 extent
Southeast Blueprint 2023 extent

Mapping Steps

Convert the South Atlantic Diadromous Analysis from vector to 30 m raster using the FINALSCORE field.
Convert the Mid-Atlantic Diadromous Analysis from vector to 30 m raster using the TotalPoints field.
Combine the above rasters using the ArcPy Spatial Analyst Cell Statistics “MAX” function.
Reclassify the above raster into 8 classes, seen in the final indicator values below.
Clip to the spatial extent of Base Blueprint 2022.
As a final step, clip to the spatial extent of Southeast Blueprint 2023. 

Note: For more details on the mapping steps, code used to create this layer is available in the Southeast Blueprint Data Download under > 6_Code. Final indicator values Indicator values are assigned as follows: 8 = Final score of 80 (areas of excellent fish habitat) 7 = Final score of 70 (areas of excellent fish habitat) 6 = Final score of 60 (restoration opportunity areas) 5 = Final score of 50 (restoration opportunity areas) 4 = Final score of 40 (restoration opportunity areas) 3 = Final score of 30 (restoration opportunity areas) 2 = Final score of 20 (restoration opportunity areas) 1 = Final score of 10 (degraded areas of opportunity) 0 = Final score of 0 (degraded areas of opportunity) Known Issues

  This indicator under and overrepresents migratory fish habitat in some areas. The South Atlantic and Mid-Atlantic Diadromous Analysis did not include fish presence and fishing data because of inconsistent sampling methods across the study area and because this data was unavailable in many shallow water habitats.

Disclaimer: Comparing with Older Indicator Versions There are numerous problems with using Southeast Blueprint indicators for change analysis. Please consult Blueprint staff if you would like to do this (email hilary_morris@fws.gov). Literature Cited Martin, Erik, Kat Hoenke, and Lisa Havel. Atlantic Coast Fish Habitat Partnership. Fish Habitat Conservation Area Mapping and Prioritization Project: A Prioritization of Atlantic Coastal, Estuarine, and Diadromous Fish Habitats for Conservation. August 2020. [https://www.atlanticfishhabitat.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/ACFHP-Mapping-and-Prioritization-Final-Report.pdf].

Swimming pools are important for property tax assessment because they impact the value of the property. Tax assessors at local government agencies often rely on expensive and infrequent surveys, leading to assessment inaccuracies. Finding pools that are not on the assessment roll (such as those recently constructed) is valuable to assessors and will ultimately mean additional revenue for the community.This deep learning model helps automate the task of finding pools from high resolution satellite imagery. This model can also benefit swimming pool maintenance companies and help redirect their marketing efforts. Public health and mosquito control agencies can also use this model to detect pools and drive field activity and mitigation efforts.Licensing requirementsArcGIS Desktop – ArcGIS Image Analyst extension for ArcGIS ProArcGIS Enterprise – ArcGIS Image Server with raster analytics configuredArcGIS Online – ArcGIS Image for ArcGIS OnlineUsing the modelFollow the guide to use the model. Before using this model, ensure that the supported deep learning libraries are installed. For more details, check Deep Learning Libraries Installer for ArcGIS.Note: Deep learning is computationally intensive, and a powerful GPU is recommended to process large datasets.Input8-bit, 3-band high resolution (5-7.5 centimeters) imageryOutputFeature class containing bounding boxes depicting pool locations with class BuiltinPool | PopupPoolApplicable geographiesThe model is expected to work well in the New Zealand.Model architectureThe model uses the MMDetection model architecture implemented using ArcGIS Pro Arcpy.Accuracy metricsThe model has an average precision score of 0.95.1 BuiltInPool2PopupPoolSample resultsHere are a few results from the model.(Post processing are recommended to filter out False Positive Object. If the confidence are below certain threshold e.g 5%)To learn how to use this model, see this story

Mosaics are published as ArcGIS image serviceswhich circumvent the need to download or order data. GEO-IDS image services are different from standard web services as they provide access to the raw imagery data. This enhances user experiences by allowing for user driven dynamic area of interest image display enhancement, raw data querying through tools such as the ArcPro information tool, full geospatial analysis, and automation through scripting tools such as ArcPy.Image services are best accessed through the ArcGIS REST APIand REST endpoints (URL's). You can copy the OPS ArcGIS REST API link below into a web browser to gain access to a directory containing all OPS image services. Individual services can be added into ArcPro for display and analysis by using Add Data -> Add Data From Path and copying one of the image service ArcGIS REST endpoint below into the resultant text box. They can also be accessed by setting up an ArcGIS server connectionin ESRI software using the ArcGIS Image Server REST endpoint/URL. Services can also be accessed in open-source software. For example, in QGIS you can right click on the type of service you want to add in the browser pane (e.g., ArcGIS REST Server, WCS, WMS/WMTS) and copy and paste the appropriate URL below into the resultant popup window. All services are in Web Mercator projection.For more information on what functionality is available and how to work with the service, read the Ontario Web Raster Services User Guide. If you have questions about how to use the service, email Geospatial Ontario (GEO) at geospatial@ontario.caAvailable Products:ArcGIS REST APIhttps://ws.geoservices.lrc.gov.on.ca/arcgis5/rest/services/AerialImagery/Image Service ArcGIS REST endpoint / URL'shttps://ws.geoservices.lrc.gov.on.ca/arcgis5/rest/services/AerialImagery/GEO_Imagery_Data_Service_2013to2017/ImageServerhttps://ws.geoservices.lrc.gov.on.ca/arcgis5/rest/services/AerialImagery/GEO_Imagery_Data_Service_2018to2022/ImageServer https://ws.geoservices.lrc.gov.on.ca/arcgis5/rest/services/AerialImagery/GEO_Imagery_Data_Service_2023to2027/ImageServerWeb Coverage Services (WCS) URL'shttps://ws.geoservices.lrc.gov.on.ca/arcgis5/services/AerialImagery/GEO_Imagery_Data_Service_2013to2017/ImageServer/WCSServer/https://ws.geoservices.lrc.gov.on.ca/arcgis5/services/AerialImagery/GEO_Imagery_Data_Service_2018to2022/ImageServer/WCSServer/https://ws.geoservices.lrc.gov.on.ca/arcgis5/services/AerialImagery/GEO_Imagery_Data_Service_2023to2027/ImageServer/WCSServer/Web Mapping Service (WMS) URL'shttps://ws.geoservices.lrc.gov.on.ca/arcgis5/services/AerialImagery/GEO_Imagery_Data_Service_2013to2017/ImageServer/WMSServer/https://ws.geoservices.lrc.gov.on.ca/arcgis5/services/AerialImagery/GEO_Imagery_Data_Service_2018to2022/ImageServer/WMSServer/https://ws.geoservices.lrc.gov.on.ca/arcgis5/services/AerialImagery/GEO_Imagery_Data_Service_2023to2027/ImageServer/WMSServer/Metadata for all imagery products available in GEO-IDS can be accessed at the links below:South Central Ontario Orthophotography Project (SCOOP) 2023North-Western Ontario Orthophotography Project (NWOOP) 2022Central Ontario Orthophotography Project (COOP) 2021South-Western Ontario Orthophotography Project (SWOOP) 2020Digital Raster Acquisition Project Eastern Ontario (DRAPE) 2019-2020South Central Ontario Orthophotography Project (SCOOP) 2018North-Western Ontario Orthophotography Project (NWOOP) 2017Central Ontario Orthophotography Project (COOP) 2016South-Western Ontario Orthophotography Project (SWOOP) 2015Algonquin Orthophotography Project (2015)Additional Documentation:Ontario Web Raster Services User Guide (Word)Status:Completed: Production of the data has been completed Maintenance and Update Frequency:Annually: Data is updated every yearContact:Geospatial Ontario (GEO), geospatial@ontario.ca

Input Data

NOAA Continuously Updated Shoreline Product (CUSP), accessed 1-11-2023; read a 1-page factsheet about CUSP; view and download CUSP data in the NOAA Shoreline Data Explorer (to download, select “Download CUSP by Region” and select Southeast Caribbean)
Southeast Blueprint 2023 subregions: Caribbean

Mapping Steps

Make a copy of the Southeast Caribbean CUSP feature line dataset and reproject it to ESPG 5070.
For the big island of Puerto Rico, special steps were required to deal with CUSP shorelines that did not connect across large rivers.
  Add and calculate a field to use to dissolve the lines.
    Dissolve the lines using the dissolve function, which reveals where there are gaps in the shoreline.
    Use the integrate tool to snap together nearby nodes, using a tolerance of 8 m. This connects the disconnected lines on the big island of Puerto Rico.
    Convert these modified shorelines to a polygon.
    Add and calculate a dissolve field, then dissolve using the dissolve tool. This is necessary because interior waterbodies on the big island of Puerto Rico also have shorelines in the CUSP data. This step produces a layer where inland waterbodies are included as a part of the island where they occur.
    From the resulting layer, select the big island of Puerto Rico and create a separate polygon feature layer from it. This extracts a modified shoreline boundary for the big island of Puerto Rico only. We don’t want to use the modified shorelines created above for other islands that didn’t have an issue of disconnected shoreline segments near large rivers.

Go back to the original Caribbean CUSP lines and convert them to polygons.
Add a dissolve field and dissolve using the dissolve tool. This produces a layer where all inland waterbodies are included as a part of the island where they occur.
From the island boundaries derived from the original CUSP data, remove the polygons that overlap with the big island of Puerto Rico derived from the modified CUSP data. This produces a layer representing all U.S. Caribbean islands except the big island of Puerto Rico.
Merge the modified big island of Puerto Rico layer with the layer for all other islands.
Create and populate a field that has unique IDs for all islands.
Convert the island polygon to a raster using the ArcPy Feature to Raster function. This makes a raster that correctly represents the interior of the islands. However, because the Feature to Raster function for polygons works differently than the Line to Raster function, the shoreline doesn’t perfectly match the result we get when we convert the CUSP lines to a raster. 
Because the Caribbean coastal shoreline condition indicator is created from the CUSP lines, we need the shorelines to match exactly. To reconcile this, go back to the original Caribbean CUSP line data and use the Feature to Raster function again, this time converting the lines to a raster. 
Use the ArcPy Cell Statistics “MAXIMUM” function to combine the two rasters above (one created from the CUSP lines and one created from the CUSP-derived polygons).
Export the raster that represents the extent of Caribbean islands.
Use the Region Group function to give unique values to each island.
Reclassify to make 3 island size classes. The big island of Puerto Rico is the only island in the highest class. The medium island class contains the following islands: Isla Mona, Isla de Vieques, Isla de Culebra, St. Thomas, St. John, and St. Croix. All other islands were put in the smaller class. All other non-island pixels in the Caribbean were given a value of marine.

Note: For more details on the mapping steps, code used to create this layer is available in the Southeast Blueprint 2023 Data Download or Caribbean-only Southeast Blueprint 2023 Data Download under > 6_Code. Literature Cited National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Ocean Service, National Geodetic Survey. NOAA Continually Updated Shoreline Product (CUSP): Southeast Caribbean. [https://coast.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/data/cusp.html].

Want to keep the data in your Hosted Feature Service current? Not interested in writing a lot of code?Leverage this Python Script from the command line, Windows Scheduled Task, or from within your own code to automate the replacement of data in an existing Hosted Feature Service. It can also be leveraged by your Notebook environment and automatically managed by the MNCD Tool!See the Sampler Notebook that features the OverwriteFS tool run from Online to update a Feature Service. It leverages MNCD to cache the OverwriteFS script for import to the Notebook. A great way to jump start your Feature Service update workflow! RequirementsPython v3.xArcGIS Python APIStored Connection Profile, defined by Python API 'GIS' module. Also accepts 'pro', to specify using the active ArcGIS Pro connection. Will require ArcGIS Pro and Arcpy!Pre-Existing Hosted Feature ServiceCapabilitiesOverwrite a Feature Service, refreshing the Service Item and DataBackup and reapply Service, Layer, and Item properties - New at v2.0.0Manage Service to Service or Service to Data relationships - New at v2.0.0Repair Lost Service File Item to Service Relationships, re-enabling Service Overwrite - New at v2.0.0'Swap Layer' capability for Views, allowing two Services to support a View, acting as Active and Idle role during Updates - New at v2.0.0Data Conversion capability, able to invoke following a download and before Service update - New at v2.0.0Includes 'Rss2Json' Conversion routine, able to read a RSS or GeoRSS source and generate GeoJson for Service Update - New at v2.0.0Renamed 'Rss2Json' to 'Xml2GeoJSON' for its enhanced capabilities, 'Rss2Json' remains for compatability - Revised at v2.1.0Added 'Json2GeoJSON' Conversion routine, able to read and manipulate Json or GeoJSON data for Service Updates - New at v2.1.0Can update other File item types like PDF, Word, Excel, and so on - New at v2.1.0Supports ArcGIS Python API v2.0 - New at v2.1.2RevisionsSep 29, 2021: Long awaited update to v2.0.0!Sep 30, 2021: v2.0.1, Patch to correct Outcome Status when download or Coversion resulted in no change. Also updated documentation.Oct 7, 2021: v2.0.2, workflow Patch correcting Extent update of Views when Overwriting Service, discovered following recent ArcGIS Online update. Enhancements to 'datetimeUtil' Support script.Nov 30, 2021: v2.1.0, added new 'Json2GeoJSON' Converter, enhanced 'Xml2GeoJSON' Converter, retired 'Rss2Json' Converter, added new Option Switches 'IgnoreAge' and 'UpdateTarget' for source age control and QA/QC workflows, revised Optimization logic and CRC comparison on downloads.Dec 1, 2021: v2.1.1, Only a patch to Conversion routines: Corrected handling of null Z-values in Geometries (discovered immediately following release 2.1.0), improve error trapping while processing rows, and added deprecation message to retired 'Rss2Json' conversion routine.Feb 22, 2022: v2.1.2, Patch to detect and re-apply case-insensitive field indexes. Update to allow Swapping Layers to Service without an associated file item. Added cache refresh following updates. Patch to support Python API 2.0 service 'table' property. Patches to 'Json2GeoJSON' and 'Xml2GeoJSON' converter routines.Sep 5, 2024: v2.1.4, Patch service manager refresh failure issue. Added trace report to Convert execution on exception. Set 'ignore-DataItemCheck' property to True when 'GetTarget' action initiated. Hardened Async job status check. Update 'overwriteFeatureService' to support GeoPackage type and file item type when item.name includes a period, updated retry loop to try one final overwrite after del, fixed error stop issue on failed overwrite attempts. Removed restriction on uploading files larger than 2GB. Restores missing 'itemInfo' file on service File items. Corrected false swap success when view has no layers. Lifted restriction of Overwrite/Swap Layers for OGC. Added 'serviceDescription' to service detail backup. Added 'thumbnail' to item backup/restore logic. Added 'byLayerOrder' parameter to 'swapFeatureViewLayers'. Added 'SwapByOrder' action switch. Patch added to overwriteFeatureService 'status' check. Patch for June 2024 update made to 'managers.overwrite' API script that blocks uploads > 25MB, API v2.3.0.3. Patch 'overwriteFeatureService' to correctly identify overwrite file if service has multiple Service2Data relationships.Includes documentation updates!

Reason for Selection Impervious cover is easy to monitor and model and is widely used and understood by diverse partners. It is also strongly linked to water quality, estuary condition, eutrophication, and freshwater inflow. Impervious surface affects not only aquatic habitats and biodiversity, but also human communities. High levels of impervious surface cause more frequent flooding by increasing the volume of stormwater runoff, reduce the amount of available drinking water by preventing groundwater recharge, and pollute waterways where people swim and fish (Chesapeake 2023, USGS 2018, EPA 2018).

The 90% permeable surface threshold (i.e., 10% impervious) is a well-documented signal of major, negative changes to aquatic ecosystems (Schueler et al. 2009). The 95% permeable surface threshold (i.e., 5% impervious) has been documented to impact Piedmont fish tricolor shiner (Cyprinella trichroistia), bronze darter (Percina palmaris), Etowah darter (Etheostoma etowahae) and estuarine species blue crab (Callinectes sapidus), white perch (Morone americana), striped bass (M. Saxatilis) and spot (Leiostomus xanthurus).

While most of these species do not occur in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, we kept these thresholds in the Caribbean for consistency with the continental version of the indicator. Input Data

Southeast Blueprint 2023 subregions: Caribbean 
Southeast Blueprint 2023 extent
2012 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coastal Change Analysis Program (C-CAP) land cover files for the U.S. Virgin Islands (St. Thomas, St. John, and St. Croix are provided as separate rasters) accessed 11-10-2022; learn more about C-CAP high resolution land cover and change products
2010 NOAA C-CAP land cover files for Puerto Rico, accessed 11-10-2022; learn more about C-CAP high resolution land cover and change products
National Hydrography Dataset Plus High Resolution (NHDPlus HR) National Release catchments, accessed 11-30-2022; download the data

CatchmentsA catchment is the local drainage area of a specific stream segment based on the surrounding elevation. Catchments are defined based on surface water features, watershed boundaries, and elevation data. It can be difficult to conceptualize the size of a catchment because they vary significantly in size based on the length of a particular stream segment and its surrounding topography—as well as the level of detail used to map those characteristics.

To learn more about catchments and how they’re defined, check out these resources:

An article from USGS explaining the differences between various NHD products
The glossary at the bottom of this tutorial for an EPA water resources viewer, which defines some key terms 


  NOAA Continuously Updated Shoreline Product (CUSP), accessed 1-11-2023; read a 1-page factsheet about CUSP; view and download CUSP data in the NOAA Shoreline Data Explorer (to download, select “Download CUSP by Region” and select Southeast Caribbean)

Mapping Steps

NHDPlus HR catchments are currently only available for the islands of Puerto Rico, Vieques, Culebra, St. Croix, St. John, and St. Thomas. Because the catchments don’t cover many of the smaller islands, use CUSP to add islands larger than 900 sq m (the area of a 30 m pixel). Start by converting CUSP shoreline lines to polygons.
Dissolve interior waterbodies on islands to represent each island with only one polygon.
To eliminate alignment issues between the CUSP and catchment polygons, remove most island areas that overlap with or are near (<10 m from) the NHDPlus HR catchments, ensuring that all of Culebra is retained.
The original NHDPlus HR catchment data was missing coverage of a small area on the west coast of Puerto Rico (just east of Parcelas Aguas Claras). Create an additional catchment polygon for this missing area so that the indicator covers the entire island of Puerto Rico.The missing area is essentially outlined by extremely thin catchment polygons. To fill the gap, make a new rectangular feature class covering the missing area, then union it together with the original NHDPlus HR catchments. From that output, select the newly created polygon that fills in the hole. 
    The resulting polygon is a multipart feature, so use the explode tool to separate out just the missing catchment. Export it as a shapefile.
    Union together the missing catchment with the other NHDPlus HR catchments and use that combined output as the catchment layer for the rest of the mapping steps.


Remove islands created from the CUSP dataset that are less than 900 sq m.
Merge the remaining CUSP islands with the NHDPlus catchments to create a single set of polygons in which to calculate average permeable surface.
Convert the C-CAP land cover rasters for Puerto Rico (2 m resolution) and the U.S. Virgin Islands (separate downloads for St. Thomas, St. John, and St. Croix with 2.4 m resolution) from .img format to .tif using the Copy Raster function.
For each individual C-CAP layer, use the ArcPy Conditional function to make a binary raster assigning the impervious class a value of 100 (representing fully impervious) and all other classes a value of 0 (representing fully permeable). This mimics the data format of the 2019 National Land Cover Database used in the continental Southeast permeable surface indicator, which provides a continuous impervious surface value ranging from 0 to 100.
Using the ArcPy Mosaic to New Raster function, mosaic all 4 rasters into 1 raster. Reproject to match the Blueprint projection and the 2 m cell size of the original Puerto Rico C-CAP data.
Calculate the average percent of impervious surface for each NHDPlus catchment or CUSP island using the ArcPy Spatial Analyst Zonal Statistics “MEAN” function, assigning the average impervious surface value to each catchment or island.
Convert percent impervious to percent permeable using the formula [percent permeable = 100 - percent impervious] to maintain consistent scoring across Southeast Blueprint indicators (where high values indicate better ecological condition).
Reclassify the above raster into 4 classes, seen in the final indicator values below.
Clip to the Caribbean Blueprint 2023 subregion.
As a final step, clip to the spatial extent of Southeast Blueprint 2023. 

Note: For more details on the mapping steps, code used to create this layer is available in the Southeast Blueprint Data Download under > 6_Code. Final indicator values Indicator values are assigned as follows: 4 = >95% of catchment or small island permeable (likely high water quality and supporting most sensitive aquatic species) 3 = >90-95% of catchment or small island permeable (likely declining water quality and supporting most aquatic species) 2 = >70-90% of catchment or small island permeable (likely degraded water quality and not supporting many aquatic species) 1 = ≤70% of catchment or small island permeable (likely degraded instream flow, water quality, and aquatic species communities) Known Issues

This indicator may not account for differences in permeability between different types of soils and land uses.
The C-CAP impervious layer used in this indicator contains classification inaccuracies that may cause this indicator to overestimate or underestimate the amount of permeable surface in some catchments.
C-CAP dates from 2010 for Puerto Rico and 2012 for the U.S. Virgin Islands. As a result, this indicator likely overestimates permeable surface values in areas that have been developed since the data was collected. 
C-CAP landcover is not available for some islands over 900 sq m. While these islands exceeded the size threshold for inclusion in this indicator, they are therefore scored as NoData. This indicator only covers areas where C-CAP landcover is present, and either NHDPlus HR catchments or islands over 900 sq m that were generated using CUSP data are also present. 
NHDPlus HR contains multiple catchments that are very small. The reduced size of these catchments may result in exaggerating their values in the indicator. 

Other Things to Keep in Mind

The impervious surface in the C-CAP data has impervious surface as one class in the landcover, which differs from the 2019 NLCD percent developed impervious layer used in the continental Southeast version of the permeable surface indicator. NLCD 2019 is served up as a continuous raster ranging from 0-100% impervious.
We used the Caribbean island size and extent layer for this indicator and not others because landcover data was available for small islands that were not covered by catchments, which otherwise would have been excluded. This was not the case for other indicators. For example, while we use catchments in natural landcover in floodplains, the floodplains and flowlines did not occur on small islands, anyway, so we did not leave any data out by using the catchments only and not supplementing with the islands layer.

Disclaimer: Comparing with Older Indicator Versions There are numerous problems with using Southeast Blueprint indicators for change analysis. Please consult Blueprint staff if you would like to do this (email hilary_morris@fws.gov). Literature Cited Chesapeake Bay Program. 2023. Stormwater Runoff. Accessed September 7, 2023. [https://www.chesapeakebay.net/issues/threats-to-the-bay/stormwater-runoff].

Environmental Protection Agency. EnviroAtlas. Data Fact Sheet. January 2018. Percent of Stream and Shoreline with 15% or More Impervious Cover within 30 Meters. Accessed September 7, 2023. [https://enviroatlas.epa.gov/enviroatlas/DataFactSheets/pdf/ESN/Percstreamw15percentimperviousin30meters.pdf].

Moore, R.B., McKay, L.D., Rea, A.H., Bondelid, T.R., Price, C.V., Dewald, T.G., and Johnston, C.M., 2019, User’s guide for the national hydrography

New Mexico 2002 primary care physician accessibility. Derived using the Generalized Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (G2SFCA) method. This is a preliminary evaluation based on the ArcPy code prepared by Dr. Fahui Wang, Louisiana State University, Department of Anthropology and Geography (See Fahui Wang, 2017). NOTE: For each distance decay method (Power, Exponential, or Gaussian) the results are presented first as the number of Physicians per Population (SUM_R) and then as the Population per Physician (Pop_P_Phys). All are based on Euclidean distance measurements. Other versions based on road distances and travel times are currently being prepared.

New Mexico 2002 primary care physician accessibility. Derived using the Generalized Two-Step Floating Catchment Area (G2SFCA) method. This is a preliminary evaluation based on the ArcPy code prepared by Dr. Fahui Wang, Louisiana State University, Department of Anthropology and Geography (See Fahui Wang, 2017). NOTE: For each distance decay method (Power, Exponential, or Gaussian) the results are presented first as the number of Physicians per Population (SUM_R) and then as the Population per Physician (Pop_P_Phys). All are based on Euclidean distance measurements. Other versions based on road distances and travel times are currently being prepared.