54 datasets found
  1. c

    Data Management Planning Institutional Underpinnings Outputs at the...

    • researchdata.canberra.edu.au
    Updated Aug 1, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kyle Hemming (2023). Data Management Planning Institutional Underpinnings Outputs at the University of Canberra [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17632/bfrt75n8wh.4
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 1, 2023
    Authors
    Kyle Hemming
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Canberra
    Description

    This data set is a collection of materials used to integrate Research Data Management Planning into the University of Canberra (UC).

    This work was completed as part of the outputs for the (ARDC) Institutional Underpinnings (IU) Project in 2022: https://ardc.edu.au/multi_project/australias-research-data-management-framework/

    The aim of sharing these materials is to provide awareness and allow the reproduction of the outcomes of this project at other institutions. Below, we briefly describe two components of this project: (1) Integration and (2) Engagement:

    (1) Integrating a data management planning (DMP) tool (ReDBox) with UC's research manager (Pure) in accordance with new UC DMP Policy. We wanted a seamless workflow for researchers to create and develop a data management plan for new research projects. That is, an integrated system that is initiated when a project is awarded in Pure, spurring the creation of a ReDBox data management plan with fields pre-filled with information from the Pure project so that researchers do not need to re-fill the same information in different platforms.

    (2) Raise awareness of this integration and the benefits of DMP for researchers. We wanted to educate researchers on the aims of DMP (specifically risk-management and data governance) as well as how to engage with that at UC, i.e. using Pure and ReDBox for their research projects and associated data management.

    Please refer to the README contained in the Outputs folder for additional information, and the project page: DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7655390. This project was one of 25 funded in the IU initative.

  2. OzFish Dataset - Machine learning dataset for Baited Remote Underwater Video...

    • researchdata.edu.au
    Updated Nov 27, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS); Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS), University of Western Australia (UWA) and Curtin University (2019). OzFish Dataset - Machine learning dataset for Baited Remote Underwater Video Stations [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25845/5e28f062c5097
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 27, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    Australian Institute Of Marine Sciencehttp://www.aims.gov.au/
    Ocean Data Network, Inc.
    Authors
    Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS); Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS), University of Western Australia (UWA) and Curtin University
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2020 - Present
    Area covered
    Description

    This dataset has been developed as part of the Australian Research Data Commons Data Discoveries program (https://ardc.edu.au/project/machine-learning-dataset-creation-for-australian-fish-species-from-baited-remote-underwater-videos-bruv/), with the aim to futher advance research into machine learning for the automated detection of fish from video. The dataset was generated from over 3000 videos which were historically analysed with the Event Measure software package and sourced from the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS), University of Western Australia (UWA) and Curtin University of Technology. The dataset is comprised of the following: - ~80k labelled crops of fish extracted from the videos, from over 500 species, 200 genera and 70 families - ~45k bounding box annotations (suitable for YOLO,RetinaNet) of fish/no fish across 1800 frames

  3. g

    Seamap Australia NBHL collated habitat datasets - superseded datasets for...

    • gimi9.com
    Updated Jul 1, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Seamap Australia NBHL collated habitat datasets - superseded datasets for archival purposes | gimi9.com [Dataset]. https://gimi9.com/dataset/au_seamap-australia-nbhl-collated-habitat-datasets-superseded-datasets-for-archival-purposes/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 1, 2025
    Area covered
    Australia
    Description

    The Seamap Australia National Benthic Habitat Layer (NBHL) is a nationally synthesised database of seafloor habitat data, classified according to the Seamap Australia National Benthic Habitat Classification Scheme (https://vocabs.ardc.edu.au/viewById/129). In generating the Seamap Australia NBHL, datasets from data providers around Australia are collated and centrally hosted by IMAS (UTAS). Through time, some datasets become superseded by newer, more accurate data for the same region (improved data collection or processing methodology). This record aggregates all habitat datasets that have been collated as part of the Seamap Australia project, but are no longer considered the most accurate/up to date habitat for a particular region and have been superseded by another product. The parent record for the Seamap Australia NBHL provides an aggregation point for all "current" habitat datasets: https://metadata.imas.utas.edu.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/4739e4b0-4dba-4ec5-b658-02c09f27ab9a

  4. Speedtest Open Data - Australia(NZ) 2020-2025; Q220 - Q125 extract by Qtr

    • figshare.com
    txt
    Updated May 2, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Richard Ferrers; Speedtest Global Index (2025). Speedtest Open Data - Australia(NZ) 2020-2025; Q220 - Q125 extract by Qtr [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13370504.v40
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 2, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Richard Ferrers; Speedtest Global Index
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    New Zealand, Australia
    Description

    This is an Australian extract of Speedtest Open data available at Amazon WS (link below - opendata.aws).AWS data licence is "CC BY-NC-SA 4.0", so use of this data must be:- non-commercial (NC)- reuse must be share-alike (SA)(add same licence).This restricts the standard CC-BY Figshare licence.A world speedtest open data was dowloaded (>400Mb, 7M lines of data). An extract of Australia's location (lat, long) revealed 88,000 lines of data (attached as csv).A Jupyter notebook of extract process is attached.See Binder version at Github - https://github.com/areff2000/speedtestAU.+> Install: 173 packages | Downgrade: 1 packages | Total download: 432MBBuild container time: approx - load time 25secs.=> Error: Timesout - BUT UNABLE TO LOAD GLOBAL DATA FILE (6.6M lines).=> Error: Overflows 8GB RAM container provided with global data file (3GB)=> On local JupyterLab M2 MBP; loads in 6 mins.Added Binder from ARDC service: https://binderhub.rc.nectar.org.auDocs: https://ardc.edu.au/resource/fair-for-jupyter-notebooks-a-practical-guide/A link to Twitter thread of outputs provided.A link to Data tutorial provided (GitHub), including Jupyter Notebook to analyse World Speedtest data, selecting one US State.Data Shows: (Q220)- 3.1M speedtests- 762,000 devices- 88,000 grid locations (600m * 600m), summarised as a point- average speed 33.7Mbps (down), 12.4M (up)- Max speed 724Mbps- data is for 600m * 600m grids, showing average speed up/down, number of tests, and number of users (IP). Added centroid, and now lat/long.See tweet of image of centroids also attached.NB: Discrepancy Q2-21, Speedtest Global shows June AU average speedtest at 80Mbps, whereas Q2 mean is 52Mbps (v17; Q1 45Mbps; v14). Dec 20 Speedtest Global has AU at 59Mbps. Could be possible timing difference. Or spatial anonymising masking shaping highest speeds. Else potentially data inconsistent between national average and geospatial detail. Check in upcoming quarters.NextSteps:Histogram - compare Q220, Q121, Q122. per v1.4.ipynb.Versions:v40: Added AUS Q125 (93k lines avg d/l 116.6 Mbps u/l 21.35 Mbps). Imported using v2 Jupyter notebook (MBP 16Gb). Mean tests: 16.9. Mean devices: 5.13. Download, extract and publish: 14 mins.v39: Added AUS Q424 (95k lines avg d/l 110.9 Mbps u/l 21.02 Mbps). Imported using v2 Jupyter notebook (MBP 16Gb). Mean tests: 17.2. Mean devices: 5.24. Download, extract and publish: 14 mins.v38: Added AUS Q324 (92k lines avg d/l 107.0 Mbps u/l 20.79 Mbps). Imported using v2 Jupyter notebook (iMac 32Gb). Mean tests: 17.7. Mean devices: 5.33.Added github speedtest-workflow-importv2vis.ipynb Jupyter added datavis code to colour code national map. (per Binder on Github; link below).v37: Added AUS Q224 (91k lines avg d/l 97.40 Mbps u/l 19.88 Mbps). Imported using speedtest-workflow-importv2 jupyter notebook. Mean tests:18.1. Mean devices: 5.4.v36 Load UK data, Q1-23 and compare to AUS and NZ Q123 data. Add compare image (au-nz-ukQ123.png), calc PlayNZUK.ipynb, data load import-UK.ipynb. UK data bit rough and ready as uses rectangle to mark out UK, but includes some EIRE and FR. Indicative only and to be definitively needs geo-clean to exclude neighbouring countries.v35 Load Melb geo-maps of speed quartiles (0-25, 25-50, 50-75, 75-100, 100-). Avg in 2020; 41Mbps. Avg in 2023; 86Mbps. MelbQ323.png, MelbQ320.png. Calc with Speedtest-incHist.ipynb code. Needed to install conda mapclassify. ax=melb.plot(column=...dict(bins[25,50,75,100]))v34 Added AUS Q124 (93k lines avg d/l 87.00 Mbps u/l 18.86 Mbps). Imported using speedtest-workflow-importv2 jupyter notebook. Mean tests:18.3. Mean devices: 5.5.v33 Added AUS Q423 (92k lines avg d/l 82.62 Mbps). Imported using speedtest-workflow-importv2 jupyter notebook. Mean tests:18.0. Mean devices: 5.6. Added link to Github.v32 Recalc Au vs NZ for upload performance; added image. using PlayNZ Jupyter. NZ approx 40% locations at or above 100Mbps. Aus

  5. r

    ARDC IU Federation University RDM Survey 2022

    • researchdata.edu.au
    Updated Nov 8, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sae Ra Germaine; Emily Pyers (2022). ARDC IU Federation University RDM Survey 2022 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25955/21442977.V1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 8, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Federation University Australia
    Authors
    Sae Ra Germaine; Emily Pyers
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC) in 2021 commenced the Institutional Underpinnings (IU) project, a collaborative project between 25 of Australia’s universities to develop a shared approach to university research data management in the form of a nationally-agreed framework. During 2021, participating institutions, including Federation University Australia, prioritised and developed an initial series of eight ‘elements’ of such a framework. Phase Two of the IU project (until August 2022) involved the testing of one of more of these elements by each participating University, with Phase Three (August until November 2022) using data from the testing phase to finalise the national framework.

    Federation University Australia nominated a Phase Two project which would test the Culture Change element through undertaking a Scoping Study to identify current University practices, resources and infrastructure related to research data management, together with developing a plan to implement, achieve and monitor sustainable best practice RDM. This project was undertaken on the University’s behalf by Sae Ra Germaine (Manager of Member and Academic Services) and Emily Pyers (Business Analyst (Metadata & Repositories)) from CAVAL Ltd.

    One component of this Phase Two Project was a survey of University researchers, with plans for follow up interviews with interested respondents to the Survey.

    The survey questions above, as well as the proposed interview questions, have been made available for reuse under a CC BY 4.0 licence.

  6. Historical Bushfire Boundaries - Version 1.0

    • ecat.ga.gov.au
    • researchdata.edu.au
    esri: map service +3
    Updated Mar 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia) (2023). Historical Bushfire Boundaries - Version 1.0 [Dataset]. https://ecat.ga.gov.au/geonetwork/srv/api/records/a82c263f-dba6-457a-aafd-bf869fe7171a
    Explore at:
    esri: map service, ogc:wms, www:link-1.0-http--link, ogc:wfsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Geoscience Australiahttp://ga.gov.au/
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1900 - Jun 30, 2022
    Area covered
    Description
    This dataset was produced under Stream 1 - Work Package 4 of the 2021-23 Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC) Bushfire Data Challenge Project; a collaborative partnership between the ARDC, Geoscience Australia, and the Emergency Management Spatial Information Network. The Project’s aim was to bring together a single nationally consistent and harmonised historical bushfire boundary data derived from the authoritative state and territory agencies. Geoscience Australia's role within this project was to; negotiate access to the data, collate and transform the data into the National Standard and then deliver the 'Historical Bushfire Boundaries' data through a static file and a webservice.

    More information about the ARDC Project and Work Package 4:
    https://ardc.edu.au/program/bushfire-data-challenges/
    More information about the Fire History Data Dictionary:
    https://www.afac.com.au/insight/doctrine/article/current/fire-history-data-dictionary

    The Historical Bushfire Boundaries dataset represents the aggregation of jurisdictional supplied burnt areas polygons stemming from the early 1900's through to 2022 (excluding the Northern Territory). The burnt area data represents curated jurisdictional owned polygons of both bushfires and prescribed (planned) burns. To ensure the dataset adhered to the nationally approved and agreed data dictionary for fire history Geoscience Australia had to modify some of the attributes presented.

    The information provided within this dataset is reflective only of data supplied by participating authoritative agencies and may or may not represent all fire history within a state.

    Important: The Northern Australia Fire Information (NAFI) data has been intentionally omitted from this dataset (refer to Lineage).
  7. g

    Seamap Australia UNVALIDATED National Benthic Habitat Layer

    • gimi9.com
    • researchdata.edu.au
    Updated Nov 18, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2024). Seamap Australia UNVALIDATED National Benthic Habitat Layer [Dataset]. https://gimi9.com/dataset/au_seamap-australia-unvalidated-national-benthic-habitat-layer/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 18, 2024
    Area covered
    Australia
    Description

    The Seamap Australia National Benthic Habitat Layer (NBHL) is a compilation of benthic habitat datasets obtained from various sectors including research, government, industry and community sources, across Australia. Disparate datasets are integrated into a single national-scale benthic habitat database, and classified uniformly under a national classification scheme implemented as a controlled vocabulary (https://vocabs.ardc.edu.au/viewById/129). For acceptance into the 'formal' (validated_ Seamap Australia NBHL (see https://metadata.imas.utas.edu.au/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/4739e4b0-4dba-4ec5-b658-02c09f27ab9a), source habitat datasets must meet a set of Acceptance Criteria (documented in https://seamapaustralia.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/SeamapAustraliaDataAcceptanceGuidelines.pdf). Broadly speaking, for inclusion in the Seamap Australia NBHL, datasets must: (1) be well-described by metadata or associated documentation; (2) employ a single, consistent classification scheme which avoids non-deterministic or ambiguous terms; (3) bequality-controlled by the provider prior to contribution; (4) beacquired using an established and community-endorsed form of data collection (eg satellite, aerial or acoustic remote sensing); and (5) have documented evidence of ground-truthing validation at the time of data collection (e.g. drop camera, towed video, benthic grabs). This record describes habitat datasets that meet Acceptance Criteria 1-4, but have not been validated/ground-truthed and are therefore ineligible for inclusion in the formal Seamap Australia NBHL. They have been synthesised and uniformly classified using an identical methodology to the NBHL, but represent an intermediate collection of habitat datasets that would benefit from field ground-truthing in order to validate the habitat classifications. The Seamap Australia synthesis of unvalidated habitat datasets can be viewed, analysed and downloaded from the Seamap Australia data portal (https://seamapaustralia.org/map). This dataset should be considered a “live” asset and will continue to develop as more unvalidated habitat datasets are collected or made available. The most current (2024) version of the data is available from the following endpoints: WMS: https://geoserver.imas.utas.edu.au/geoserver/seamap/wms WFS: https://geoserver.imas.utas.edu.au/geoserver/seamap/wfs Layer name: SeamapAus_NBHL_unvalidated Various download options are supplied in the “Online resources” section of this record.

  8. AusTraits Plant Dictionary (APD)

    • zenodo.org
    bin, csv, html, json
    Updated Jun 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Elizabeth Wenk; Elizabeth Wenk; Daniel Falster; Daniel Falster; Hervé Sauquet; Hervé Sauquet; Rachael Gallagher; Rachael Gallagher; Rowan Brownlee; Rowan Brownlee; Carl Boettiger; Carl Boettiger (2023). AusTraits Plant Dictionary (APD) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8040790
    Explore at:
    bin, json, html, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Elizabeth Wenk; Elizabeth Wenk; Daniel Falster; Daniel Falster; Hervé Sauquet; Hervé Sauquet; Rachael Gallagher; Rachael Gallagher; Rowan Brownlee; Rowan Brownlee; Carl Boettiger; Carl Boettiger
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The Austraits Plant Dictionary (APD) offers detailed descriptions for more than 500 plant trait concepts.

    APD includes trait focused on plant morphology, plant nutrient concentrations, plant physiology, plant life history, and plant fire response. The definitions will be useful to researchers from diverse disciplines, including plant functional ecology, plant taxonomy, and conservation biology. All trait concepts are supported by comprehensive metadata including trait descriptions, allowable trait values, allowable ranges, preferred units, keywords, references, and links to matches in a selection of trait databases. The traits describe here also fully support the AusTraits plant trait database, doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3568417.

    The APD can be viewed online at:

    The project GitHub repository is at:

  9. Deliverable package for ARDC Bushfire Data Challenge, Bushfire History Data...

    • ecat.ga.gov.au
    • researchdata.edu.au
    Updated Dec 18, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia) (2023). Deliverable package for ARDC Bushfire Data Challenge, Bushfire History Data Project, Work Package 5 [Dataset]. https://ecat.ga.gov.au/geonetwork/srv/api/records/0303294e-02d1-43bf-a43c-36519c2e4b49
    Explore at:
    www:link-1.0-http--linkAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 18, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Geoscience Australiahttp://ga.gov.au/
    Time period covered
    Jul 1, 2019 - Dec 31, 2020
    Area covered
    Description
    A package of deliverables for the Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC), Bushfire History Data Project, Work Package 5. If you require further information or access, please contact earth.observation@ga.gov.au

    Outputs generated for this Project are interim and represent a snapshot of work to date, as of September 2023. Deliverables are developmental in nature and are under further advancement. Datasets or visualisations should not be treated as endorsed, authoritative, or quality assured; and should not be used for anything other than a minimal viable product, especially not for safety of life decisions. The eventual purpose of this information is for strategic decisions, rather than tactical decisions. For local data, updates and alerts, please refer to your State or Territory emergency or fire service.

    The purpose of this Project (WP5) was to generate fire history products from Earth observation (EO) data available from the Landsat and Sentinel-2 satellites. WP5 aimed to implement a suite of automated EO-based algorithms currently in use by State and Territory agencies, to produce National-scale data products describing the timing, location, and extent of bushfires across Australia. WP5 outputs are published here as a “deliverable package”, listed as documents, datasets and Jupyter notebooks.

    Burnt area data demonstrators were produced to a Minimum Viable Product level. Four burnt area detection methods were investigated:
    * BurnCube (Geoscience Australia, ANU, (Renzullo et al. 2019)),
    * Burnt Area Characteristics (Geoscience Australia, unpublished methodology),
    * A version of the Victoria’s Random Forest (Victorian, Tasmanian and New South Wales Governments). Based on method as described in Collins et al. (2018), and
    * Queensland’s RapidFire (Queensland Government, (Van den Berg et al. 2021). Please note that demonstrator burnt area data from the Queensland method was only investigated for the Queensland location. Data were sourced from Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN) infrastructure, which is enabled by the Australian Government National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS).

    In addition demonstrator products that examine the use of Near Real Time satellite data to map burnt area, data quality and data uncertainty were delivered.

    The algorithms were tested on several study sites:
    * Eastern Victoria,
    * Cooktown QLD,
    * Kangaroo Island SA,
    * Port Hedland WA, and
    * Esperance WA.

    The BurnCube (Renzullo et al. 2019) method was implemented at a national-scale using the Historic Burnt Area Processing Pipeline documented below “GA-ARDC-DataProcessingPipeline.pdf”. Continental-scale interim summary results were generated for both 2020 Calendar Year and 2020 Financial Year. Results were based upon both Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 (combined 2a and 2b) satellite outputs, producing four separate interim products:
    * Landsat 8, 2020 Calendar Year, BurnCube Summary (ga_ls8c_nbart_bc_cyear_3),
    * Landsat 8, 2020 Financial Year, BurnCube Summary (ga_ls8c_nbart_bc_fyear_3),
    * Sentinel 2a and 2b, 2020 Calendar Year, BurnCube Summary (ga_s2_ard_bc_cyear_3),
    * Sentinel 2a and 2b, 2020 Financial Year, BurnCube Summary (ga_s2_ard_bc_fyear_3).
    The other methods have sample products for the study sites, as discussed in the "lineage" section.

    The Earth observation approach has several limitations, leading to errors of omission and commission (ie under estimation and over estimation of the burnt area). Omission errors can result from: lack of visibility due to clouds; small or patchy fires; rapid vegetation regrowth between fire and satellite observation; cool understorey burns being hidden by the vegetation canopy. Commission errors can result from: incorrect cloud or cloud-shadow masking; high-intensity land-use changes (such as cropping); areas of inundation. In addition cloud and shadow masking lead to differences in elapsed time between reference imagery and observations of change resulting in differences in burn area detection. For more information on data caveats please see Section 7.6 of DRAFT-ARDC-WP5-HistoricBurntArea.

    The official Project title is: The Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC), Bushfire Data Challenges Program; Project Stream 1: the ARDC Bushfire History Data Project; Work Package 5 (WP5): National burnt area products analysed from Landsat and Sentinel 2 satellite imagery.

    We thank the Mindaroo Foundation and ARDC for their support in this work.
  10. ARDC - Linking Research and Industry to Power up Innovation

    • digitalscience.figshare.com
    pdf
    Updated Mar 20, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mingfang Wu; Jo Dalvean (2024). ARDC - Linking Research and Industry to Power up Innovation [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25335913.v2
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 20, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Digital Sciencehttp://digital-science.com/
    Authors
    Mingfang Wu; Jo Dalvean
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Mingfang Wu and Jo Dalvean of ARDC discuss linking research and industry to power up innovation.

  11. r

    ARDC IU Federation University RDM interview questions 2022

    • researchdata.edu.au
    Updated Nov 8, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sae Ra Germaine; Emily Pyers (2022). ARDC IU Federation University RDM interview questions 2022 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25955/21442962.V1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 8, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Federation University Australia
    Authors
    Sae Ra Germaine; Emily Pyers
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC) in 2021 commenced the Institutional Underpinnings (IU) project, a collaborative project between 25 of Australia’s universities to develop a shared approach to university research data management in the form of a nationally-agreed framework. During 2021, participating institutions, including Federation University Australia, prioritised and developed an initial series of eight ‘elements’ of such a framework. Phase Two of the IU project (until August 2022) involved the testing of one of more of these elements by each participating University , with Phase Three (August until November 2022) using data from the testing phase to finalise the national framework.

    Federation University Australia nominated a Phase Two project which would test the Culture Change element through undertaking a Scoping Study to identify current University practices, resources and infrastructure related to research data management, together with developing a plan to implement, achieve and monitor sustainable best practice RDM. This project was undertaken on the University’s behalf by Sae Ra Germaine (Manager of Member and Academic Services) and Emily Pyers (Business Analyst (Metadata & Repositories)) from CAVAL Ltd.

    One component of this Phase Two Project was a survey of University researchers, with plans for follow up interviews with interested respondents to the Survey.

    The proposed interview questions above, as well as the survey questions, have been made available for reuse under a CC BY 4.0 licence.

  12. D

    NSW Historical Bushfire Boundaries (WebMap)

    • data.nsw.gov.au
    Updated May 29, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Spatial Services (DCS) (2025). NSW Historical Bushfire Boundaries (WebMap) [Dataset]. https://data.nsw.gov.au/data/dataset/1-b137790186c247418a904512da521148
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 29, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Spatial Services (DCS)
    Area covered
    New South Wales
    Description

    This dataset is a filtered product from “The Historical Bush Fire Boundaries” dataset which is available here.

    Below filters are applied to “The Historical Bush fire Boundaries” dataset to prepare this visualisation:

    • Records within New South Wales state boundaries.
    • Records with known attributes of "extinguish_date" and "ignition_date".
    • Duration is a calculated attribute called "duration"; derived from "extinguish_date" and "ignition_date" attributes.
    • "duration" in days = "extinguish_date" – "ignition_date" + 1


    Visualisation and Attributes:
    • Time enabled based on the "ignition_date"
    • Colored based on the "fire_type"
    • Transparency based on the "duration"

    Useful links,

    Content TitleNSW Historical Bushfire Boundaries (WebMap)
    Content TypeWeb Map
    DescriptionNSW Fire history data; including bushfires and prescribed burns ranging from 1998 to 2022 with known duration.
    Initial Publication Date23/08/2023
    Data Currency01/09/2022
    Data Update FrequencyOther
    Content SourceWebsite URL
    File TypeMap Feature Service
    AttributionFor additional information, please contact us via the Spatial Services Customer Hub
    Data Theme, Classification or Relationship to other DatasetsFor additional information, please contact us via the Spatial Services Customer Hub
    AccuracyFor additional information, please contact us via the Spatial Services Customer Hub
    Spatial Reference System (dataset)GDA94
    Spatial Reference System (web service)EPSG:3857
    WGS84 Equivalent ToGDA2020
    Spatial Extent
    Content Lineage
    Data ClassificationUnclassified
    Data Access PolicyOpen
    Data Quality
    Terms and ConditionsCreative Common
    Standard and SpecificationFor additional information, please contact us via the Spatial Services Customer Hub
    Data

  13. D

    NSW Historical Bushfire Boundaries WebApp

    • data.nsw.gov.au
    url
    Updated Aug 11, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Spatial Services (DCS) (2025). NSW Historical Bushfire Boundaries WebApp [Dataset]. https://data.nsw.gov.au/data/dataset/1-ee9b623c76ec472db53528dbe3a9bb55
    Explore at:
    urlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 11, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Spatial Services (DCS)
    Area covered
    New South Wales
    Description

    This dataset is a filtered product from “The Historical Bush fire Boundaries” dataset which is available here.

    Below filters are applied to “The Historical Bush fire Boundaries” dataset to prepare this visualisation:

    • Records within New South Wales state boundaries.
    • Records with known attributes of "extinguish_date" and "ignition_date".
    • Duration is a calculated attribute called "duration"; derived from "extinguish_date" and "ignition_date" attributes.
    • "duration" in days = "extinguish_date" – "ignition_date" + 1


    Visualisation and Attributes:
    • Time enabled based on the "ignition_date"
    • Colored based on the "fire_type"
    • Transparency based on the "duration"

    Useful links,

    <tr style='border-bottom:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);

    Content TitleNSW Historical Bushfire Boundaries WebApp
    Content TypeWeb Application
    DescriptionNSW Fire history data; including bushfires and prescribed burns ranging from 1998 to 2022 with known duration.
    Initial Publication Date23/08/2023
    Data Currency23/08/2023
    Data Update FrequencyOther
    Content SourceOther
    File TypeMap Feature Service
    AttributionFor additional information, please contact us via the Spatial Services Customer Hub
    Data Theme, Classification or Relationship to other DatasetsFor additional information, please contact us via the Spatial Services Customer Hub
    AccuracyFor additional information, please contact us via the Spatial Services Customer Hub
    Spatial Reference System (dataset)GDA94
    Spatial Reference System (web service)EPSG:3857
    WGS84 Equivalent ToGDA94
    Spatial Extent
    Content Lineage
    Data ClassificationUnclassified
    Data Access PolicyOpen
    Data Quality
    Terms and ConditionsCreative Common
    Standard and SpecificationFor additional information, please contact us via the Spatial Services Customer Hub
  14. Australian Reference Genome Atlas Project, ARDC Bushfire Data Commons Forum,...

    • osf.io
    Updated Apr 10, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kathryn Hall; Sarah Richmond; Nigel Ward; Hamish Holewa; Jeff Christiansen (2025). Australian Reference Genome Atlas Project, ARDC Bushfire Data Commons Forum, 19 July 2022 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AED7P
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 10, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Center for Open Sciencehttps://cos.io/
    Authors
    Kathryn Hall; Sarah Richmond; Nigel Ward; Hamish Holewa; Jeff Christiansen
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Australia
    Description

    Slides for presentation at the ARDC Bushfire Data Commons Forum, held on 19 July 2022 (online, Australia).

  15. ARDC Stock: A Bright Investment or a Bubble Waiting to Burst? (Forecast)

    • kappasignal.com
    Updated Dec 21, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    KappaSignal (2023). ARDC Stock: A Bright Investment or a Bubble Waiting to Burst? (Forecast) [Dataset]. https://www.kappasignal.com/2023/12/ardc-stock-bright-investment-or-bubble.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 21, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    KappaSignal
    License

    https://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.htmlhttps://www.kappasignal.com/p/legal-disclaimer.html

    Description

    This analysis presents a rigorous exploration of financial data, incorporating a diverse range of statistical features. By providing a robust foundation, it facilitates advanced research and innovative modeling techniques within the field of finance.

    ARDC Stock: A Bright Investment or a Bubble Waiting to Burst?

    Financial data:

    • Historical daily stock prices (open, high, low, close, volume)

    • Fundamental data (e.g., market capitalization, price to earnings P/E ratio, dividend yield, earnings per share EPS, price to earnings growth, debt-to-equity ratio, price-to-book ratio, current ratio, free cash flow, projected earnings growth, return on equity, dividend payout ratio, price to sales ratio, credit rating)

    • Technical indicators (e.g., moving averages, RSI, MACD, average directional index, aroon oscillator, stochastic oscillator, on-balance volume, accumulation/distribution A/D line, parabolic SAR indicator, bollinger bands indicators, fibonacci, williams percent range, commodity channel index)

    Machine learning features:

    • Feature engineering based on financial data and technical indicators

    • Sentiment analysis data from social media and news articles

    • Macroeconomic data (e.g., GDP, unemployment rate, interest rates, consumer spending, building permits, consumer confidence, inflation, producer price index, money supply, home sales, retail sales, bond yields)

    Potential Applications:

    • Stock price prediction

    • Portfolio optimization

    • Algorithmic trading

    • Market sentiment analysis

    • Risk management

    Use Cases:

    • Researchers investigating the effectiveness of machine learning in stock market prediction

    • Analysts developing quantitative trading Buy/Sell strategies

    • Individuals interested in building their own stock market prediction models

    • Students learning about machine learning and financial applications

    Additional Notes:

    • The dataset may include different levels of granularity (e.g., daily, hourly)

    • Data cleaning and preprocessing are essential before model training

    • Regular updates are recommended to maintain the accuracy and relevance of the data

  16. r

    Seamap Australia National Benthic Habitat Layer (NBHL)

    • researchdata.edu.au
    Updated Jul 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Butler, Claire; Flukes, Emma; Walsh, Peter; Johnson, Craig; Lucieer, Vanessa (2025). Seamap Australia National Benthic Habitat Layer (NBHL) [Dataset]. https://researchdata.edu.au/seamap-australia-national-habitat-layer/1730412
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 24, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    University of Tasmania, Australia
    Authors
    Butler, Claire; Flukes, Emma; Walsh, Peter; Johnson, Craig; Lucieer, Vanessa
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1967 - Apr 1, 2024
    Area covered
    Description

    The Seamap Australia National Benthic Habitat Layer (NBHL) is a compilation of benthic habitat datasets obtained from various sectors including research, government, industry and community sources, across Australia. These disparate datasets have been integrated into a single national-scale benthic habitat database, and classified uniformly under a national classification scheme implemented as a controlled vocabulary (https://vocabs.ardc.edu.au/viewById/129). Creation of this classification scheme complements work undertaken by the National Environmental Science Program (NESP) Marine Biodiversity Hub (Theme D).

    For acceptance into the Seamap Australia NBHL, source habitat datasets must meet a set of Acceptance Criteria (documented in https://seamapaustralia.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/SeamapAustraliaDataAcceptanceGuidelines.pdf).

    Broadly speaking, for inclusion in the Seamap Australia NBHL, datasets must:
    (1) be well-described by metadata or associated documentation;
    (2) employ a single, consistent classification scheme which avoids non-deterministic or ambiguous terms;
    (3) bequality-controlled by the provider prior to contribution;
    (4) beacquired using an established and community-endorsed form of data collection (eg satellite, aerial or acoustic remote sensing); and
    (5) have documented evidence of ground-truthing validation at the time of data collection (e.g. drop camera, towed video, benthic grabs).

    The Seamap Australia NBHL can be viewed, analysed and downloaded from the Seamap Australia data portal (https://seamapaustralia.org/map) – a national repository of seafloor habitat data and a decision support tool for marine managers. All habitat datasets in the Seamap Australia data portal, including the NBHL and all local- to regional-scale contributing datasets, are available for download.

    The Seamap Australia NBHL is a data collection of national importance and highlights the diversity of benthic habitats across Australia’s marine estate. This is the first Australian habitat dataset that seamlessly consolidates data from each of Australia’s state and territory providers. This dataset should be considered a “live” asset and will continue to develop as more suitable validated habitat data becomes available for inclusion, and improvements in data collection and analysis techniques enhance its resolution and currency.

    The most current (2025) version of the data is available from the following endpoints:
    WMS: https://geoserver.imas.utas.edu.au/geoserver/seamap/wms
    WFS: https://geoserver.imas.utas.edu.au/geoserver/seamap/wfs
    Layer name: SeamapAus_National_Benthic_Habitat_Layer

    A download link for the full dataset is supplied in the 'Download and Links' section of this record, along with download links to older versions of the dataset. Note that data is now only available in Geodatabase (.gdb) format as it exceeds Shapefile size limits.

  17. v

    A R D C Ltd Arm Company profile with phone,email, buyers, suppliers, price,...

    • volza.com
    csv
    Updated Dec 8, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Volza FZ LLC (2025). A R D C Ltd Arm Company profile with phone,email, buyers, suppliers, price, export import shipments. [Dataset]. https://www.volza.com/company-profile/a-r-d-c-ltd-arm-21231169/
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 8, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Volza FZ LLC
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    2014 - Sep 30, 2021
    Variables measured
    Count of exporters, Count of importers, Sum of export value, Sum of import value, Count of export shipments, Count of import shipments
    Description

    Credit report of A R D C Ltd Arm contains unique and detailed export import market intelligence with it's phone, email, Linkedin and details of each import and export shipment like product, quantity, price, buyer, supplier names, country and date of shipment.

  18. Ardc-Heating-&-Cooling (Company) - Reverse Whois Lookup

    • whoisdatacenter.com
    csv
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    AllHeart Web Inc, Ardc-Heating-&-Cooling (Company) - Reverse Whois Lookup [Dataset]. https://whoisdatacenter.com/company/Ardc-Heating-&-Cooling/
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset provided by
    Authors
    AllHeart Web Inc
    License

    https://whoisdatacenter.com/terms-of-use/https://whoisdatacenter.com/terms-of-use/

    Time period covered
    Mar 15, 1985 - Aug 3, 2025
    Description

    Uncover historical ownership history and changes over time by performing a reverse Whois lookup for the company Ardc-Heating-&-Cooling.

  19. ARDC Stock Price Predictions

    • meyka.com
    json
    Updated May 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    MEYKA AI (2025). ARDC Stock Price Predictions [Dataset]. https://meyka.com/stock/ARDC/forecasting/
    Explore at:
    jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 25, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Meyka AI
    Authors
    MEYKA AI
    License

    https://meyka.com/licensehttps://meyka.com/license

    Time period covered
    Jul 17, 2025 - Jul 17, 2032
    Variables measured
    Weekly Forecast, Yearly Forecast, 3 Years Forecast, 5 Years Forecast, 7 Years Forecast, Monthly Forecast, Half Year Forecast, Quarterly Forecast
    Description

    AI-powered price forecasts for ARDC stock across different timeframes including weekly, monthly, yearly, and multi-year predictions.

  20. postmaster@ardc.net - Reverse Whois Lookup

    • whoisdatacenter.com
    csv
    Updated Jun 10, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    AllHeart Web Inc (2021). postmaster@ardc.net - Reverse Whois Lookup [Dataset]. https://whoisdatacenter.com/email/postmaster@ardc.net/
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 10, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Authors
    AllHeart Web Inc
    License

    https://whoisdatacenter.com/terms-of-use/https://whoisdatacenter.com/terms-of-use/

    Time period covered
    Mar 15, 1985 - Jul 15, 2025
    Description

    Explore historical ownership and registration records by performing a reverse Whois lookup for the email address postmaster@ardc.net..

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Kyle Hemming (2023). Data Management Planning Institutional Underpinnings Outputs at the University of Canberra [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17632/bfrt75n8wh.4

Data Management Planning Institutional Underpinnings Outputs at the University of Canberra

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Aug 1, 2023
Authors
Kyle Hemming
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Area covered
Canberra
Description

This data set is a collection of materials used to integrate Research Data Management Planning into the University of Canberra (UC).

This work was completed as part of the outputs for the (ARDC) Institutional Underpinnings (IU) Project in 2022: https://ardc.edu.au/multi_project/australias-research-data-management-framework/

The aim of sharing these materials is to provide awareness and allow the reproduction of the outcomes of this project at other institutions. Below, we briefly describe two components of this project: (1) Integration and (2) Engagement:

(1) Integrating a data management planning (DMP) tool (ReDBox) with UC's research manager (Pure) in accordance with new UC DMP Policy. We wanted a seamless workflow for researchers to create and develop a data management plan for new research projects. That is, an integrated system that is initiated when a project is awarded in Pure, spurring the creation of a ReDBox data management plan with fields pre-filled with information from the Pure project so that researchers do not need to re-fill the same information in different platforms.

(2) Raise awareness of this integration and the benefits of DMP for researchers. We wanted to educate researchers on the aims of DMP (specifically risk-management and data governance) as well as how to engage with that at UC, i.e. using Pure and ReDBox for their research projects and associated data management.

Please refer to the README contained in the Outputs folder for additional information, and the project page: DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7655390. This project was one of 25 funded in the IU initative.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu