According to the latest available data, there were around **** suicide deaths per 100,000 population in the United States in 2023. Suicide remains one of the leading causes of death in the U.S. highlighting the need for awareness and prevention. The suicide rate in the U.S. has risen for both men and women in recent years but remains over ***** times higher for men. Hospitalizations In 2021, there were around ******* adults hospitalized in the U.S. after a suicide attempt. Although the suicide rate among men is significantly higher than among women, there are more hospitalizations after suicide attempts for women than for men. In 2019, there were ******* such hospitalizations among women and ******* hospitalizations among men. Public opinionSuicide can be a divisive topic that involves religious and political views. Recent data shows that ** percent of the U.S. population believes suicide is morally wrong, while ** percent believe it to be morally acceptable. However, only ** percent of adults believe it is “very important” to invest public dollars in the prevention of suicide.

Since the 1950s, the suicide rate in the United States has been significantly higher among men than women. In 2022, the suicide rate among men was almost four times higher than that of women. However, the rate of suicide for both men and women has increased gradually over the past couple of decades. Facts on suicide in the United States In 2022, the rate of suicide death in the United States was around 14 per 100,000 population. The suicide rate in the U.S. has generally increased since the year 2000, with the highest rates ever recorded in the years 2018 and 2022. In the United States, death rates from suicide are highest among those aged 45 to 64 years and lowest among younger adults aged 15 to 24. The states with the highest rates of suicide are Montana, Alaska, and Wyoming, while New Jersey and Massachusetts have the lowest rates. Suicide among men In 2023, around 4.5 percent of men in the United States reported having serious thoughts of suicide in the past year. Although this rate is lower than that of women, men still have a higher rate of suicide death than women. One reason for this may have to do with the method of suicide. Although firearms account for the largest share of suicide deaths among both men and women, firearms account for almost 60 percent of all suicides among men and just 35 percent among women. Suffocation and poisoning are the other most common methods of suicide among women, with the chances of surviving a suicide attempt from these methods being much higher than surviving an attempt by firearm. The age group with the highest rate of suicide death among men is by far those aged 75 years and over.

Download data on suicides in Massachusetts by demographics and year. This page also includes reporting on military & veteran suicide, and suicides during COVID-19.

Among men in the United States, those aged 75 years and older have the highest death rate from suicide among all age groups. In 2023, the suicide death rate among men aged 75 years and older was 40.7 per 100,000 population. In comparison, the death rate from suicide among men aged 25 to 44 years was 29.8 per 100,000. Suicide is a significant problem in the United States, with rates increasing over the past decade. Suicide among men In the United States, the suicide rate among men is almost four times higher than that of women. In 2022, the rate of suicide among U.S. men was 23 per 100,000 population, the highest rate recorded over the past 70 years. Firearms account for the vast majority of suicide deaths among men, accounting for around 60 percent of male suicides in 2021. The reasons why U.S. men have higher rates of suicide than women are complex and not fully understood, but may have to do with the more violent means by which men carry out suicide and the stigma around seeking help for mental health issues. Suicide among women Although the suicide rate among women in the U.S. is significantly lower than that of men, the rate of suicide among women has increased over the past couple of decades. Among women, those aged 45 to 64 years have the highest death rates due to suicide, followed by women 25 to 44 years old. Interestingly, the share of women reporting serious thoughts of suicide in the past year is higher than that of men, with around 5.5 percent of U.S. women reporting such thoughts in 2023. Similarly to men, firearms account for most suicide deaths among women, however suffocation and poisoning account for a significant share of suicides among women. In 2021, around 35 percent of suicides among women were carried out by firearms, while suffocation and poisoning each accounted for around 28 percent of suicide deaths.

In 2023, the rate of suicides among both men and women in England was at their highest recorded rates. The rate of among males was 17.4 per 100,000 population and among females it was 5.7 per 100,000. Recent years have seen an increase again for both genders, however, the rate of suicide for men has remained significantly higher than for women. Individuals seeking help for mental health issuesIn Great Britain, almost 70 percent have never visited a mental health professional, while eighteen percent consult with one at least once a year. Additionally, almost 60 percent of those with a psychiatric condition do not take any medication to control their condition. Mental health of young peopleThe COVID-19 pandemic had a huge impact of the mental health of many people, particularly young people. The share of all adults reporting to having experienced symptoms of depression doubled during the pandemic compared to before. Although for those in the age group 16 to 39 years, depression prevalence tripled. Among young people that had mental health concerns prior to the pandemic, a significant majority of those surveyed reported that their life had become worse due to the impact of the pandemic and subsequent restrictions.

this project to realized in Power Bi:

Suicide rates vary around the world Suicide rates vary widely between countries. The map shows this.

For some countries in Southern Africa and Eastern Europe, the estimated rates of suicide are high, with over 15 annual deaths per 100,000 people.

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F16731800%2F0ad0b0509ea3e47fa4fef0c0df5a7650%2Fgraph1.jpg?generation=1709580346519280&alt=media" alt="">

Meanwhile for other countries in Europe, South America and Asia, the estimated rates of suicide are lower, with under 10 annual deaths per 100,000 people.

The wide range in suicide rates around the world is likely the result of many factors. This includes differences in underlying mental health and treatment, personal and financial stress, restrictions on the means of suicide, recognition and awareness of suicide, and other factors.

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F16731800%2F4852c4fa7dd9966750113f508fa189ea%2Fgraph2_page-0001.jpg?generation=1709580403955230&alt=media" alt="">

WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THIS DATA Suicide estimates come from death certificate data, using deaths that were classified under death codes for 'intentional self-harm' in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). This includes people who had self-harmed but had not intended to die, and they may not be considered suicides by the country's particular legal definition. In many countries, deaths due to self-harm are highly underreported due to social stigma, cultural and legal concerns. Instead, these deaths are often misclassified in reported data, especially as deaths due to "events of undetermined intent", accidents, homicides, or unknown causes. To account for this, the WHO's Global Health Observatory reclassifies a proportion of deaths reported with those causes as suicides, according to the fraction that are estimated to be deaths by suicide. As a result, data on suicide rates represent a better estimate of how many people die from suicide.

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F16731800%2F70c55821265e5e2e25f693d3bb0d6520%2Fgraph3_page-0001.jpg?generation=1709580432933739&alt=media" alt="">

Suicides may still be underestimated after this adjustment, especially if they are misclassified as other types of deaths.2 This can also be why some countries appear to have rising suicide rates, if the rates of misclassification decline.

As the tagline of ‘American Association of Suicidology’ says I strongly believe that suicide prevention is everyone’s business. The act of ending one’s own life stating the reasons to be depression, alcoholism or any other mental disorders for that matter is not a considerable idea keeping in mind that anything can be overcome with reliable help and lifestyle. We can choose to stand together in the face of a society which may often feel like a lonely and disconnected place, and we can choose to make a difference by making lives more livable for those who struggle to cope. Through this project, I am hoping to identify the trends of suicidal rates by country, gender, age and ethnicity. And relate the trends to the possible reasons that leads to the drastic decision, which might help us to curb the thought in the very beginning.

What's inside is more than just rows and columns. Make it easy for others to get started by describing how you acquired the data and what time period it represents, too. Data on suicides is deficient for two reasons, first of all, there is a problem with the frequency and reliability of vital registration data in many countries – an issue that undermine the quality of mortality estimates in general, not just suicide. Secondly, there are problems with the accuracy of the official figures made available, since suicide registration is a complicated process involving several responsible authorities with medical and legal concerns. Moreover, the illegality of suicidal behavior in some countries contributes to under reporting and misclassification. I was lucky enough to obtain enough data from different reliable resources. I will be starting off the project with the most reliable datasets available for us on suicide.

•World Health Organization (WHO) dataset which contains entity wise suicide rates, crude suicide rates per gender and country which are age standardized which has a geographical coverage of 198 countries. The time spanning from 1950-2011.

•Samaritans statistics report 2017 including data for 2013-2015, in order to reduce the time, it takes to register deaths, the maximum time between a death and registration is eight days.

•American Association of Suicidology facts and statistics which are categorized by age, gender, region and ethnicity.

Inspiration: To visualize the trends and patterns by merging different datasets available regarding the subject matter from different organizations, deriving the major causes for the drastic stride. And also observing the changes in patterns over the years by country, sex and ethnicity

Understanding the data: It is always tricky to understand the suicide statistics as they may not be so straight forward as they appear to be. Generally, the rate is per 100,000. It is done this way to adjust the underlying population size. ‘Age-standardized’ rates have been standardized to the world population to increase the confidence while making the comparisons. On the other hand, ‘Crude rates’ have not been standardized like the prior, so they are just the basic calculation of number of deaths divided by the population (x100,000). The size of the population and specific cohort is also to be taken into account as smaller groups often produce less reliable rates per 100,000. When examining the suicide trends over a period of time it is also important to look over a relatively long period. Increases and decreases for a year at a time should not be considered in isolation.

Number of suicides and suicide rates by sex and age in England and Wales. Includes information on conclusion type, the proportion of suicides by method, and the median registration delay.

In 2024, over 20,300 people in Japan died of suicide. The overall number of suicides decreased after the unexpected upward trend, likely connected to the COVID-19 pandemic. Why Japanese men are more likely to die by suicide  When looking at suicide numbers by gender, Japanese men are more likely to commit suicide compared to women. Attitudes on traditional gender roles in Japan may have shifted in recent decades, but social change has since been slow. Men are still expected to focus on their careers and provide for the family. Hence, economic slumps are typically reflected in rising suicide figures among men, as failure to fulfill social expectations can lead to mental health issues, which in turn might trigger suicidal thoughts. As an example, the suicide figures increased only for men in 2009 as a result of the global banking crisis. Suicide resulting from work-related issues is also more common among men than among women. Stress and pressure at work pose health risks It has been determined over the past few decades that one of the primary issues facing Japanese workers that leads to self-harm is exhaustion. Occupational sudden mortality, known as "karoshi (death by overwork)" is a well-known phenomenon in Japanese society. Besides physical pressure, mental stress from the employment may cause karoshi. Suicide due to occupational stress or overwork is called "karojisatsu (overwork suicide)" in Japan.

Deaths of despair (deaths due to alcohol, drugs and suicide)¹ have been on the rise among adults. This topic explores suicide rates among Massachusetts residents by race/ethnicity and age.

Suicide Prevention Crisis Lines Platforms Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global Suicide Prevention Crisis Lines Platforms market size reached USD 1.35 billion in 2024, reflecting a robust response to the rising global mental health crisis. The market is expected to expand at a CAGR of 12.7% from 2025 to 2033, driven by technological advancements and increased societal awareness. By 2033, the market is projected to attain a value of USD 4.00 billion, as per our comprehensive industry analysis. The growth of this market is being propelled by heightened investments in mental health infrastructure and the integration of digital technologies into crisis intervention services.

One of the primary growth factors for the Suicide Prevention Crisis Lines Platforms market is the increasing prevalence of mental health disorders globally. With suicide remaining a leading cause of death among individuals aged 15-29, there is an urgent need for accessible and immediate crisis intervention solutions. The proliferation of smartphones and internet connectivity has made it possible for individuals to access mental health support at any time, regardless of their location. This technological accessibility is encouraging more people to seek help, thereby driving the adoption of crisis line platforms. Furthermore, the stigma around mental health is gradually diminishing, which is fostering a more supportive environment for individuals to reach out for assistance. The convergence of these factors is creating a fertile ground for the expansion of suicide prevention platforms, as more organizations and governments recognize the necessity of these services in combating rising suicide rates.

Another significant driver is the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning into crisis line platforms. AI-powered chatbots and predictive analytics are enabling platforms to offer real-time, personalized support to individuals in crisis. These technologies can detect warning signs in conversations, prioritize high-risk cases, and escalate them to human counselors when necessary. The use of advanced analytics also allows for the continuous improvement of intervention strategies, as platforms can analyze large volumes of anonymized data to identify trends and optimize their services. As a result, the market is witnessing a surge in demand for technologically advanced solutions that can provide both immediate and long-term support to at-risk individuals. This technological evolution is not only enhancing the effectiveness of crisis intervention but also expanding the reach of these services to underserved populations.

Government initiatives and policy changes are also playing a pivotal role in the growth of the Suicide Prevention Crisis Lines Platforms market. Many countries are implementing national suicide prevention strategies that emphasize the importance of crisis intervention and mental health support. Funding for mental health services has increased significantly, with governments partnering with private organizations and non-profits to expand the availability of crisis lines. Additionally, regulatory frameworks are being established to ensure the quality, confidentiality, and accessibility of these services. These supportive policies are encouraging more organizations to invest in suicide prevention platforms, thereby accelerating market growth. The alignment of public health goals with technological innovation is creating a synergistic effect that is propelling the market forward.

From a regional perspective, North America currently dominates the Suicide Prevention Crisis Lines Platforms market, accounting for the largest share in 2024. This leadership position is attributed to the high prevalence of mental health issues, strong governmental support, and the presence of advanced healthcare infrastructure. However, the Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the fastest growth during the forecast period, driven by increasing awareness, improving digital connectivity, and rising investments in healthcare technology. Europe is also making significant strides, with several countries launching national helpline initiatives and integrating crisis lines into broader mental health strategies. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are gradually catching up, with international organizations and local governments focusing on expanding access to mental health support. The regional dynamics of the market reflect the global recognition of suicide prevention as a critical public heal

Incidence of suicide rate for BFP participation, overall, by sex and age group, in the original and matched cohorts from 2004–2015.

AI Suicide Risk Stratification Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global AI Suicide Risk Stratification market size reached USD 1.18 billion in 2024, driven by the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence in mental health care and the urgent need for advanced predictive analytics in suicide prevention. The market is experiencing robust growth, registering a CAGR of 18.9% from 2025 to 2033. By the end of 2033, the market is forecasted to reach USD 6.15 billion, reflecting significant investments in healthcare digitization, growing awareness of mental health issues, and the integration of AI-powered solutions across various healthcare settings. The expanding role of AI in early risk detection and intervention is a primary growth catalyst, as per our comprehensive analysis.

One of the key growth factors propelling the AI Suicide Risk Stratification market is the escalating global mental health crisis, marked by rising suicide rates and the pressing need for timely intervention. Traditional methods of suicide risk assessment often rely on subjective clinical judgment, which can be inconsistent and prone to bias. AI-driven stratification tools, leveraging machine learning and natural language processing, enable healthcare professionals to identify at-risk individuals with higher accuracy and efficiency. These platforms analyze vast datasets, including electronic health records, social media activity, and behavioral patterns, to generate actionable insights. As governments and healthcare organizations increasingly prioritize suicide prevention strategies, the demand for advanced, data-driven risk assessment solutions is expected to surge, further accelerating market expansion.

Another substantial driver for the AI Suicide Risk Stratification market is the rapid advancement in AI technology and its integration into healthcare systems. Recent breakthroughs in deep learning, predictive analytics, and big data have revolutionized the way mental health professionals approach suicide risk assessment. AI-based solutions can continuously learn and adapt, offering real-time risk predictions and personalized intervention recommendations. This technological evolution is complemented by the growing availability of high-quality mental health data, improved interoperability of health IT systems, and rising investments from both public and private sectors. As healthcare providers seek to enhance patient outcomes and reduce the burden of suicide, the adoption of AI-powered risk stratification tools is becoming a standard practice.

The increasing acceptance of digital health solutions and telemedicine is also fueling the growth of the AI Suicide Risk Stratification market. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the shift towards remote healthcare delivery, highlighting the need for scalable and accessible mental health assessment tools. AI-driven platforms can be seamlessly integrated into telehealth services, enabling clinicians to monitor patients remotely and intervene proactively. Furthermore, the growing emphasis on preventive care and population health management is prompting healthcare systems to invest in predictive analytics for early identification of high-risk individuals. This trend is particularly pronounced in developed regions, where digital infrastructure and regulatory support for AI in healthcare are more advanced.

From a regional perspective, North America currently dominates the AI Suicide Risk Stratification market, accounting for the largest share due to its advanced healthcare infrastructure, high awareness levels, and strong presence of leading AI solution providers. However, the Asia Pacific region is anticipated to witness the fastest growth over the forecast period, driven by increasing mental health challenges, government initiatives to improve healthcare access, and rapid digital transformation in emerging economies. Europe is also a significant contributor, benefiting from supportive regulatory frameworks and rising investments in mental health research. Meanwhile, Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are gradually embracing AI-driven mental health solutions, although market penetration remains relatively lower due to infrastructural and economic constraints.

Component Analysis

The Component segment of the AI Suicide Risk Stratification market is categorized into Software, Hardware, and Services, each playing a pivotal role in the ecosystem. Softwa

In 2024, Japan reported 16.4 suicides per 100,000 inhabitants. The country's suicide rate resumed its downward trend after an unexpected surge in recent years, likely connected to the COVID-19 pandemic. What are the reasons behind Japan’s high suicide rates?  While the majority of suicides in Japan stemmed from health reasons, existential concerns and problems directly related to work also accounted for thousands of self-inflicted deaths in the past years. One of the most profound issues faced by employees in Japan leading to self-harm is exhaustion. “Karoshi,” or death by overwork, is a well-known phenomenon in Japanese society. In addition to physical fatigue, karoshi may be precipitated by mental stress resulting from employment. Occupational stress or overwork-induced suicide is referred to as “karojisatsu (overwork suicide)” in Japan. Which demographic groups are affected? Although *************** are frequently depicted as the most at-risk demographic for suicide in Japan, the increasing occurrence of suicides among the elderly people and schoolchildren is causing concern. Bullying, isolation, and the lack of a proficient mental healthcare system can be additional factors contributing to the country’s high suicide rates among all age groups.

Suicide Prevention Crisis Lines Platforms Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global suicide prevention crisis lines platforms market size reached USD 1.96 billion in 2024. The market is experiencing robust growth, with a recorded CAGR of 10.2% between 2025 and 2033. By the end of 2033, the market is forecasted to reach USD 5.15 billion. This growth is primarily driven by a rising global awareness about mental health, increased governmental and non-governmental initiatives for suicide prevention, and rapid digitalization of mental health support services.

The growth trajectory of the suicide prevention crisis lines platforms market is underpinned by a confluence of critical factors. Foremost among these is the increasing prevalence of mental health disorders and suicide rates worldwide, which has catalyzed a surge in demand for accessible, immediate intervention services. As societies become more open about discussing mental health, there is a greater push from both public and private sectors to develop robust support infrastructures. Governments and healthcare organizations are investing heavily in crisis intervention technologies, recognizing the urgent need for scalable and effective solutions. The COVID-19 pandemic further amplified the necessity for remote mental health support, accelerating the adoption of digital platforms that offer telephonic, chat, and text-based crisis intervention, thereby expanding the market’s reach and impact.

Another significant driver for the suicide prevention crisis lines platforms market is the technological evolution in communication and data analytics. The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning into crisis management platforms has enabled more efficient triaging, personalization of interventions, and real-time monitoring of high-risk individuals. These technological advancements have not only improved the efficacy of crisis lines but also enhanced the scalability and accessibility of services. Mobile applications and cloud-based solutions, in particular, have democratized access to help, allowing individuals in remote or underserved areas to connect with trained professionals instantly. This technological leap has been instrumental in bridging the gap between those in need and the support systems available, contributing significantly to market expansion.

Social and cultural shifts are also playing a pivotal role in shaping the suicide prevention crisis lines platforms market. Increased advocacy, destigmatization campaigns, and educational programs have led to greater public acceptance and utilization of mental health services. Community organizations, educational institutions, and workplaces are collaborating with technology providers to integrate suicide prevention resources into their operational frameworks. This multi-sectoral approach has broadened the end-user base for crisis line platforms, encouraging innovation in service delivery and expanding the market’s potential. Furthermore, funding from philanthropic organizations and international agencies has spurred research and development, leading to the launch of culturally sensitive and linguistically diverse platforms that cater to global populations.

Regionally, North America continues to dominate the suicide prevention crisis lines platforms market, accounting for the largest share in 2024, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. The high market share is attributed to robust healthcare infrastructure, proactive policy frameworks, and the presence of leading technology providers. However, Asia Pacific is emerging as the fastest-growing region, propelled by increasing mental health awareness, rapid digital adoption, and supportive government initiatives. Middle East & Africa and Latin America are also witnessing gradual growth, spurred by international collaborations and investments in mental health infrastructure. The regional landscape is expected to evolve as more countries prioritize suicide prevention in their public health agendas.

Platform Type Analysis

The platform type segment of the suicide prevention crisis lines platforms market is segmented into telephonic, text messaging, online chat, mobile applications, and others. Telephonic crisis lines have historically dominated this segment, owing to their long-established presence and familiarity among users. These platforms offer immediate, voice-based support, which is often considered the gold standard in crisis

I was interested in exploring the possible causes that might increase the risk of suicide in societies. I decided to enrich the suicide data set by adding more features from the World Development Indicator database to the original suicide data. Suicide Rates Overview 1985 to 2016

Inspiration

What are the causes for increased risk of suicide in societies?

References

Suicide Rates Overview 1985 to 2016

The World Bank World Development Indicators

Finland FI: Suicide Mortality Rate: Male data was reported at 23.900 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 21.800 NA for 2015. Finland FI: Suicide Mortality Rate: Male data is updated yearly, averaging 28.400 NA from Dec 2000 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 36.800 NA in 2000 and a record low of 21.800 NA in 2015. Finland FI: Suicide Mortality Rate: Male data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Finland – Table FI.World Bank.WDI: Health Statistics. Suicide mortality rate is the number of suicide deaths in a year per 100,000 population. Crude suicide rate (not age-adjusted).; ; World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory Data Repository (http://apps.who.int/ghodata/).; Weighted average;

IntroductionThe suicide rate of South Korea has increased dramatically during the past decades, as opposed to steadily decreasing trends in Japan and Hong Kong. Although the recent increase of suicide in South Korea may be related to changing socioeconomic conditions and other contextual factors, it may also reflect, in part, a reduction of misidentified suicide cases due to improving classification of manner of death.MethodWe compared the annual proportional change of suicide, undetermined death, and accidental death from South Korea with those of Japan and Hong Kong from 1992 to 2011; a greater proportional change of the manner-of-death categories during the period is indicative of a relatively less stable registration and hence a greater potential for misclassification bias on reported suicide trends. Subgroup analyses stratifying the deaths by methods were also conducted. To estimate the impact, the age-standardized rates of these three death categories in each site were calculated.ResultsWe found that, during the 20-year observation period, the proportional change of suicide, undetermined death, and accidental death in South Korea was significantly greater than Japan and Hong Kong. Similar observations were made in subgroup analyses. While death rates of the three manners in Japan and Hong Kong generally moved in a parallel fashion, the increase of suicide in South Korea occurred concomitantly with a significant reduction of its accidental death rate. 43% of the increase in suicides could be attributed to the decrease in accidental deaths, while 57% of the increase could be due to fundamental causes.ConclusionOur data suggest that, during the mid-1990s and after, the increasing burden of suicide in South Korea initially was masked, in part, by misclassification. Thus, the later apparently rapid increase of suicides reflected steadily improving classification of manner of death, as well as a more fundamental increase in the suicide rate.

ABSTRACT CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The World Health Organization recognizes suicide as a public health priority. Increased knowledge of suicide risk factors is needed in order to be able to adopt effective prevention strategies. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the association between the Gini coefficient (which is used to measure inequality) and suicide death rates over a 14-year period (2000-2013) in Brazil and in the United States (US). The hypothesis put forward was that reduction of income inequality is accompanied by reduction of suicide rates. DESIGN AND SETTING: Descriptive cross-sectional time-series study in Brazil and in the US. METHODS: Population, death and suicide death data were extracted from the DATASUS database in Brazil and from the National Center for Health Statistics in the US. Gini coefficient data were obtained from the World Development Indicators. Time series analysis was performed on Brazilian and American official data regarding the number of deaths caused by suicide between 2000 and 2013 and the Gini coefficients of the two countries. The suicide trends were examined and compared. RESULTS: Brazil and the US present converging Gini coefficients, mainly due to reduction of inequality in Brazil over the last decade. However, suicide rates are not converging as hypothesized, but are in fact rising in both countries. CONCLUSION: The hypothesis that reduction of income inequality is accompanied by reduction of suicide rates was not verified.

Anti-Suicide Drugs Market was valued at USD 3.62 Billion in 2018 and is projected to reach USD 4.95 Million by 2026, growing at a CAGR of 3.98% from 2019 to 2026.One of the major driving factors for the market is the increasing suicidal rates around the globe. According to WHO, out of the total deaths that happened in 2017, around 1-1.5% accounted for suicides. Other factors contributing to the growth of the market are rising awareness about good mental health, changing, increased focus on research and development leading to the launch of novel anti-suicidal drugs. However, lack of effective therapies, abusive used of drugs leading to addiction and rising adoption of unapproved therapies are likely to cause hindrance in the market growth over the forecast period.