3 datasets found
  1. f

    Table_2_Individual-based socioeconomic vulnerability and deprivation...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Aug 14, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dionysios Palermos; Elpida Pavi; Panagiotis Halvatsiotis; Polyxeni Mangoulia; Theodoros N. Sergentanis; Theodora Psaltopoulou (2024). Table_2_Individual-based socioeconomic vulnerability and deprivation indices: a scoping review.DOCX [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1403723.s002
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 14, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Dionysios Palermos; Elpida Pavi; Panagiotis Halvatsiotis; Polyxeni Mangoulia; Theodoros N. Sergentanis; Theodora Psaltopoulou
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Several individual-based social deprivation and vulnerability indices have been developed to measure the negative impact of low socioeconomic status on health outcomes. However, their variables and measurable characteristics have not been unequivocally assessed. A comprehensive database literature scoping review was performed to identify all individual-based social deprivation and vulnerability indices. Area-based indices and those developed for pediatric populations were excluded. Data were extracted from all eligible studies and their methodology was assessed with quality criteria. A total of 14 indices were identified, of which 64% (9/14) measured social deprivation and 36% (5/14) measured socioeconomic vulnerability. Sum of weights was the most common scoring system, present in 43% (6/14) of all indices, with no exclusive domains to either vulnerability or deprivation indices. A total of 83 different variables were identified; a very frequent variable (29%; 5/14) related to an individual’s social relationships was “seen any family or friends or neighbors.” Only five deprivation indices reported a specific internal consistency measure, while no indices reported data on reproducibility. This is the first scoping review of individual-based deprivation and vulnerability indices, which may be used interchangeably when measuring the impact of SES on health outcomes.

  2. G

    Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation

    • open.canada.ca
    • catalogue.arctic-sdi.org
    esri rest, fgdb/gdb +3
    Updated Mar 2, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statistics Canada (2022). Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation [Dataset]. https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/5c670585-97ed-4e6a-a607-30fab940ff88
    Explore at:
    wms, fgdb/gdb, mxd, html, esri restAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 2, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Statistics Canada
    License

    Open Government Licence - Canada 2.0https://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Canada
    Description

    The Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation (CIMD) is an area-based index which used 2016 Census of Population microdata to measure four key dimensions of deprivation at the dissemination area (DA)-level: residential instability, economic dependency, situational vulnerability and ethno-cultural composition. Using factor analysis, DA-level factor scores were calculated for each dimension. Within a dimension, ordered scores were assigned a quintile value, 1 through 5, where 1 represents the least deprived and 5 represents the most deprived. The CIMD allows for an understanding of inequalities in various measures of health and social well-being. While it is a geographically-based index of deprivation and marginalization, it can also be used as a proxy for an individual. The CIMD has the potential to be widely used by researchers on a variety of topics related to socio-economic research. Other uses for the index may include: policy planning and evaluation, or resource allocation.

  3. S

    Quantifying Cognitive Decline through Driving Behavior: The DRIVES Project's...

    • scidb.cn
    Updated Dec 13, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Matthew Blake; David Brown; Yiqi Zhu; Chen Chen; Noor Al-Hammadi; Ganesh M. Babulal (2024). Quantifying Cognitive Decline through Driving Behavior: The DRIVES Project's Multidimensional Approach to Aging and ADRD [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.18535
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Dec 13, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Science Data Bank
    Authors
    Matthew Blake; David Brown; Yiqi Zhu; Chen Chen; Noor Al-Hammadi; Ganesh M. Babulal
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The DRIVES Project collects and processes low frequency and high frequency naturalistic driving data in order to study their association with cognitive decline in older drivers. Both sets of data are obtained daily from an off-the-shelf telematics datalogger that is installed our participants' vehicles. The low frequency data is collected at 1 Hz in 30 second intervals, whereas the high frequency data is collected at 24 Hz in one second intervals. The low frequency data is collected in the form of four CSV files: 1) A breadcrumbs file that contains the periodic driving data, 2) An activity file that provides detailed trip information, 3) An events file that provides detailed information on all adverse events 4) A a summary file that aggregates all daily trips carried out by each vehicle a day. The high frequency data is collected in the form of JSON files; each JSON file contains data for a single trip taken by a single vehicle on a given day. Each JSON is processed into four data tables: 1) A trip_info table that provides the periodic driving data 2) An activity table that details all adverse events that occurred during the trip (i.e. speeding, hard braking, idling etc.) 3) A braking table that details all hard braking events that occurred during the trip, and 4) A idling table that details each time the vehicle was idle during a trip.In addition to naturalistic driving data, the DRIVES Project collects clinical and neuropsychological data from our enrolled participants. Our participants undergo a variety of neuropsychological evaluations from which the DRIVES Project derives this data from (see attached data descriptor for more details). The DRIVES Project also collects data related to social determinants of health (SDoH). In particular, the DRIVES Project uses our participants' primary home addresses to obtain their Area of Deprivation Index (ADI) and Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) rankings. These rankings are provided by the Center of Health Disparities Research at the University of Wisconsin, Madison and the Center for Disease Control’s Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.The DRIVES Project uses two Python scripts to process the raw data files for the LFD and HFD. The scripts remove data and transforms the raw data files as needed to create the processed tables. In this repository, we provide a short demo of how our scripts processes our raw data in preparation for subsequent analysis or data storage. The demo code provides a walkthrough on how our scripts process 4 LFD CSV files that the DRIVES Project collected on March 31st, 2023 and a single HFD trip JSON that the project collected on March 31st, 2023. In the raw_data folder, we have provided four 'Spring2023' CSV files that contain the combined daily files that we download for the breadcrumbs, activity, events, and summary LFD data from March 1st, 2023 to May 31st, 2023. We've also provided three tarballs (.tar.gz files) that contain all of the HFD trip JSONs that we downloaded during the same time period; each tarball corresponds to the HFD trip JSONs we downloaded in a month (i.e. March, April, May). We've included these comprehensive files in case users would like to experiment with our scripts on more data.See attached metadata file for an explanation on the features for each table.

  4. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Dionysios Palermos; Elpida Pavi; Panagiotis Halvatsiotis; Polyxeni Mangoulia; Theodoros N. Sergentanis; Theodora Psaltopoulou (2024). Table_2_Individual-based socioeconomic vulnerability and deprivation indices: a scoping review.DOCX [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1403723.s002

Table_2_Individual-based socioeconomic vulnerability and deprivation indices: a scoping review.DOCX

Related Article
Explore at:
docxAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Aug 14, 2024
Dataset provided by
Frontiers
Authors
Dionysios Palermos; Elpida Pavi; Panagiotis Halvatsiotis; Polyxeni Mangoulia; Theodoros N. Sergentanis; Theodora Psaltopoulou
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

Several individual-based social deprivation and vulnerability indices have been developed to measure the negative impact of low socioeconomic status on health outcomes. However, their variables and measurable characteristics have not been unequivocally assessed. A comprehensive database literature scoping review was performed to identify all individual-based social deprivation and vulnerability indices. Area-based indices and those developed for pediatric populations were excluded. Data were extracted from all eligible studies and their methodology was assessed with quality criteria. A total of 14 indices were identified, of which 64% (9/14) measured social deprivation and 36% (5/14) measured socioeconomic vulnerability. Sum of weights was the most common scoring system, present in 43% (6/14) of all indices, with no exclusive domains to either vulnerability or deprivation indices. A total of 83 different variables were identified; a very frequent variable (29%; 5/14) related to an individual’s social relationships was “seen any family or friends or neighbors.” Only five deprivation indices reported a specific internal consistency measure, while no indices reported data on reproducibility. This is the first scoping review of individual-based deprivation and vulnerability indices, which may be used interchangeably when measuring the impact of SES on health outcomes.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu