The 2020 cartographic boundary KMLs are simplified representations of selected geographic areas from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). These boundary files are specifically designed for small-scale thematic mapping. When possible, generalization is performed with the intent to maintain the hierarchical relationships among geographies and to maintain the alignment of geographies within a file set for a given year. Geographic areas may not align with the same areas from another year. Some geographies are available as nation-based files while others are available only as state-based files. The cartographic boundary files include both incorporated places (legal entities) and census designated places or CDPs (statistical entities). An incorporated place is established to provide governmental functions for a concentration of people as opposed to a minor civil division (MCD), which generally is created to provide services or administer an area without regard, necessarily, to population. Places always nest within a state, but may extend across county and county subdivision boundaries. An incorporated place usually is a city, town, village, or borough, but can have other legal descriptions. CDPs are delineated for the decennial census as the statistical counterparts of incorporated places. CDPs are delineated to provide data for settled concentrations of population that are identifiable by name, but are not legally incorporated under the laws of the state in which they are located. The boundaries for CDPs often are defined in partnership with state, local, and/or tribal officials and usually coincide with visible features or the boundary of an adjacent incorporated place or another legal entity. CDP boundaries often change from one decennial census to the next with changes in the settlement pattern and development; a CDP with the same name as in an earlier census does not necessarily have the same boundary. The only population/housing size requirement for CDPs is that they must contain some housing and population. The generalized boundaries of most incorporated places in this file are based on those as of January 1, 2020, as reported through the Census Bureau's Boundary and Annexation Survey (BAS). The generalized boundaries of all CDPs based on those delineated as part of the Census Bureau's Participant Statistical Areas Program (PSAP) for the 2020 Census.

This dataset contains the Maricopa County, Arizona City Council District boundaries for those cities with council districts. This includes Phoenix, Surprise, Buckeye, Peoria, Glendale and Mesa.

This dataset maps out the boundaries for municipal jurisdictions in Pima County, Arizona. Jurisdictions include:City of TucsonTown of MaranaTown of Oro ValleyTown of SahuaritaCity of South TucsonPima CountyClick here to visit Pima County's Open Data site.PurposeThis layer was developed locate the municipal boundaries of jurisdictions in Pima County, Arizona.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 - OpenKnown UsesThis layer is not in any known applications.Get Started with this Data• What is the largest incorporated jurisdiction by area?• Which incorporated jurisdiction has the longest boundary?• Which jurisdiction do I live in?Known Errors NoneContactPima CountyUpdate FrequencyAs Needed

This data is basically one in the same as showing Arizona incorporated city boundaries. There are 91 incorporated cities in Arizona. These city boundaries are dynamic as there are city annexations occurring on a consistent basis.

The City of Tempe ZIP Codes feature class is intended to show the USPS ZIP Code boundaries within Tempe, Arizona.

The cities annex feature class is intended to track city and town annexations in Maricopa County, Arizona.

The 2019 cartographic boundary KMLs are simplified representations of selected geographic areas from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). These boundary files are specifically designed for small-scale thematic mapping. When possible, generalization is performed with the intent to maintain the hierarchical relationships among geographies and to maintain the alignment of geographies within a file set for a given year. Geographic areas may not align with the same areas from another year. Some geographies are available as nation-based files while others are available only as state-based files. The records in this file allow users to map the parts of Urban Areas that overlap a particular county. After each decennial census, the Census Bureau delineates urban areas that represent densely developed territory, encompassing residential, commercial, and other nonresidential urban land uses. In general, this territory consists of areas of high population density and urban land use resulting in a representation of the ""urban footprint."" There are two types of urban areas: urbanized areas (UAs) that contain 50,000 or more people and urban clusters (UCs) that contain at least 2,500 people, but fewer than 50,000 people (except in the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam which each contain urban clusters with populations greater than 50,000). Each urban area is identified by a 5-character numeric census code that may contain leading zeroes. The primary legal divisions of most states are termed counties. In Louisiana, these divisions are known as parishes. In Alaska, which has no counties, the equivalent entities are the organized boroughs, city and boroughs, municipalities, and for the unorganized area, census areas. The latter are delineated cooperatively for statistical purposes by the State of Alaska and the Census Bureau. In four states (Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia), there are one or more incorporated places that are independent of any county organization and thus constitute primary divisions of their states. These incorporated places are known as independent cities and are treated as equivalent entities for purposes of data presentation. The District of Columbia and Guam have no primary divisions, and each area is considered an equivalent entity for purposes of data presentation. The Census Bureau treats the following entities as equivalents of counties for purposes of data presentation: Municipios in Puerto Rico, Districts and Islands in American Samoa, Municipalities in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Islands in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The entire area of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas is covered by counties or equivalent entities. The generalized boundaries for counties and equivalent entities are as of January 1, 2010.

The 2015 cartographic boundary shapefiles are simplified representations of selected geographic areas from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). These boundary files are specifically designed for small-scale thematic mapping. When possible, generalization is performed with the intent to maintain the hierarchical relationships among geographies and to maintain the alignment of geographies within a file set for a given year. Geographic areas may not align with the same areas from another year. Some geographies are available as nation-based files while others are available only as state-based files. The records in this file allow users to map the parts of Urban Areas that overlap a particular county. After each decennial census, the Census Bureau delineates urban areas that represent densely developed territory, encompassing residential, commercial, and other nonresidential urban land uses. In general, this territory consists of areas of high population density and urban land use resulting in a representation of the "urban footprint." There are two types of urban areas: urbanized areas (UAs) that contain 50,000 or more people and urban clusters (UCs) that contain at least 2,500 people, but fewer than 50,000 people (except in the U.S. Virgin Islands and Guam which each contain urban clusters with populations greater than 50,000). Each urban area is identified by a 5-character numeric census code that may contain leading zeroes. The primary legal divisions of most states are termed counties. In Louisiana, these divisions are known as parishes. In Alaska, which has no counties, the equivalent entities are the organized boroughs, city and boroughs, municipalities, and for the unorganized area, census areas. The latter are delineated cooperatively for statistical purposes by the State of Alaska and the Census Bureau. In four states (Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia), there are one or more incorporated places that are independent of any county organization and thus constitute primary divisions of their states. These incorporated places are known as independent cities and are treated as equivalent entities for purposes of data presentation. The District of Columbia and Guam have no primary divisions, and each area is considered an equivalent entity for purposes of data presentation. The Census Bureau treats the following entities as equivalents of counties for purposes of data presentation: Municipios in Puerto Rico, Districts and Islands in American Samoa, Municipalities in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Islands in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The entire area of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas is covered by counties or equivalent entities. The boundaries for counties and equivalent entities are as of January 1, 2010.

Lake Havasu City Extent of Public GIS Map Viewer

The purpose of this dataset is to fulfill the public and Government’s need to know which agency is managing Federal land in a given area. For example, there may be a need to know what agency is managing a certain tract of land for the purpose of paying permit fees, obtaining licenses, or becoming informed about current laws, regulations, and restrictions governing access to and use of the land. This dataset serves as a tool to determine and illustrate the boundaries of a particular Federal agency’s “managing” area and to quantify these areas in terms of geographic acreage. These data are public information and may be used by various organizations, agencies, units of government (i.e., Federal, state, county, and city), and other entities. The geographic acreages contained in this dataset are not derived from legal documents associated with title documents or survey records. Rather, they are computed by mathematical programs and are described in detail in the supplemental section of the definition document referenced at the end of this section.The data can be used for small scale (1:24,000 and smaller) analysis and cartographic products.SMA was originally derived from the land dataset produced by the Arizona State Land Dept (ASLD), and the Arizona Land Resource Information System (ALRIS). The land dataset was initiated in 1984 and updated in the spring of 1988 by the State Land Department Forestry Division and ALRIS. The data was then projected into ARC/INFO format and edited using the procedures from the ASLD Land Status Map Digitizing Procedure guide. The land dataset covers the entire State of Arizona and includes surface management, public land survey system (PLSS) provided by the Department of Transportation (ADOT), and county and state boundaries.

The City Voting District boundaries. Data provided by Maricopa County Elections. This layer was created by Maricopa County Recorder's Office - Elections Department and modified to fit the City of Buckeye's data model.

This map depicts the geology of the Huachuca City 7.5' quadrangle in Cochise County, southeastern Arizona, which consists almost entirely of upper Cenozoic surficial deposits. The map area is located between Benson and Sierra Vista along the western side of the upper San Pedro River Valley. The map area covers much of the southeastern piedmont of the Mustang and Whetstone mountains, part of the valley of the Babocomari River, and part of the northern piedmont of the Huachuca Mountains. It includes the small communities of Huachuca City and Whetstone, and the northern fringe of Fort Huachuca, a U.S. Army base. The quadrangle is roughly bisected by State Route 92, a major four-lane highway connecting the Sierra Vista area with Interstate Highway 10 to the north. The area was mapped during March through August, 2003. A 1:24,000 scale map is the primary product of this study. This map consists entirely of new mapping. The accompanying report describes rock units and other geologic features.

A 1:24,000 scale, geologic map of the Meadview North Quadrangle in Mohave County, Arizona and Clark County, Nevada, with description of 54 geologic units. Detailed geologic mapping by Mark A. Wallace, James E. Faulds, and Robert J. Brady of the Department of Geology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242; Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557; Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, T2N 1N. The GIS work was in support of the U. S. Geological Survey COGEOMAP program. The Geodatabase specifies feature datasets and feature classes, together with feature attributes, subtypes and domains, suitable for the printed geologic map. In addition to basic geology (lithology, contacts and faults, etc.), the maps may include metamorphic overprints, cross sections, and explanatory legend graphics such as correlation charts, used to supplement columnar legends. The Geologic Map of the Meadview North 7.5' Quadrangle in Mohave County, Arizona and Clark County, Nevada 1:24,000-scale is available for download online in Portable Document Format. Field work was supported by an EDMAP grant from the U.S. Geological Survey (Copperative agreement 1434-HQ-97-AG- 07146) and National Science Foundation grant EAR99-10977 awarded to Faulds. The U.S. Geological Survey also provided a field vehicle and funds for digitizing and publication of the map, for which we thank Gary Dixon and Peter Rowley. The National Park Service at Lake Mead National Recreation Area kindly provided boat access into some relatively inaccessible areas. The Meadview North Quadrangle lies within the northeasternmost part of the Colorado River extensional corridor (Howard and John, 1987; Faulds and others, 1990), which is a 70 to 100-km wide region of moderately to highly extended crust between the Colorado Plateau on the east and Spring Mountains on the west. The quadrangle contains much of the town of Meadview, Arizona, as well as the southern part of the Grand Wash trough (including much of the Gregg Basin), southern part of Wheeler Ridge, and northern end of a mountain range informally referred to as the Lost Basin Range (after Theodore and others, 1987). Base map: U. S. Geological Survey Meadview North 7.5-minute Quadrangle, 1984. To download and view this map resource and associated map text and GIS zipped data-set, please see the links provided.

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts statistics for Page city, Arizona. QuickFacts data are derived from: Population Estimates, American Community Survey, Census of Population and Housing, Current Population Survey, Small Area Health Insurance Estimates, Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, State and County Housing Unit Estimates, County Business Patterns, Nonemployer Statistics, Economic Census, Survey of Business Owners, Building Permits.

Plan submitted by: WBeard on 10/21/2021 USER DESCRIPTION: The areas of Arizona City/Eloy and South Casa Grande have a greater community of interest being in the same district as Marana (CD 6 on map) than with Yuma. The population balance is created by adjusting the amount of the City of Tucson within CD 7 on this map. USER PLAN OBJECTIVE: The area east of Tohono reservation in Pinal County (ELoy/S Casa Grande/AZ City) have more in common with Marana than with Yuma. Population balanced in City of Tucson. Maintains more communities of interest and doesn't affect VRA requirements.

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts statistics for Sedona city, Arizona. QuickFacts data are derived from: Population Estimates, American Community Survey, Census of Population and Housing, Current Population Survey, Small Area Health Insurance Estimates, Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, State and County Housing Unit Estimates, County Business Patterns, Nonemployer Statistics, Economic Census, Survey of Business Owners, Building Permits.

Water surface elevations of the base flood as approved by the Federal mergency management Agency (FEMA) for the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM). The base flood elevation, in feet, is in relation to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929. Profile baselines are for the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM). The cross section data are used for the production of Flood Insurance Rate Maps. The Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) show different floodplains with different zone designations. These are primarily for insurance rating purposes, but the zone differentiation can be very helpful for other floodplain management purposes. The differentiated floodplain zones are used for the production of Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Maricopa County has been subdivided into FIRM panels for the publication and distribution of FIRMs. Profile baselines are for the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM).

Annex displays all annexations and deannexations for all municipal jurisdictions in Pima County. Each annexation or deannexation is displayed. The outer boundary of all annexations is the corporate limits.Click here to visit Pima County's Open Data site.PurposeThis layer was developed to show annexations and deannexations in Pima County, Arizona.Dataset ClassificationLevel 0 - OpenKnown UsesThis layer is not in any known applications.Known Errors This layer has overlapping map features as a result of deannexations and any subsequent annexations in the same area.ContactPima County - GISdata@pima.govUpdate FrequencyAs Needed

City of Mesa population provided by Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP) updated annually as of July 1. See Population and Housing Unit Estimates. Census PEP estimates are used for state revenue sharing per AZ statute (42-5033.01). This dataset is the authoritative source for all city metrics such as Crimes or Traffic Collisions per 1,000 residents.

2025-2040 population projections provided by Maricopa County Association of Governments (MAG) and adopted June 2023. MAG's planning area and incorporated jurisdiction projections are published at 2023 MAG Socioeconomic Projections

Other sources of population estimates include US Census American Community Survey 1-year and 5-year Estimates at https://citydata.mesaaz.gov/d/n5gn-m5c3 and https://citydata.mesaaz.gov/Economic-Development/d/9nqf-ygw6, Arizona Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO) at https://www.azcommerce.com/oeo/population/population-estimates/ (see link for OEO methodology which differs slightly from official US Census Estimates) and City of Mesa Office of Economic Development at https://www.selectmesa.com/business-environment/demographics (ESRI Community Analyst).

U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts statistics for Avondale city, Arizona. QuickFacts data are derived from: Population Estimates, American Community Survey, Census of Population and Housing, Current Population Survey, Small Area Health Insurance Estimates, Small Area Income and Poverty Estimates, State and County Housing Unit Estimates, County Business Patterns, Nonemployer Statistics, Economic Census, Survey of Business Owners, Building Permits.