City of Tempe Zoning and Overlay District map. Users may toggle between viewing all zones and individual overlay districts in the operational layers list. The Zoning and Development Code (ZDC) establishes land use classifications; creates zoning districts; establishes regulations, prohibitions and restrictions on land use and development; governs the use of land for residential and non-residential purposes; regulates the height and bulk of buildings and other structures; regulates lot occupancy and the size of yards and other open spaces; establishes standards of performance and design; adopts a map of the zoning districts; creates boards and commissions for land use and development decisions and defines the powers and duties of the boards and commissions; prescribes procedures for amendments to the General Plan, the ZDC, zoning map, use permits, development plan and land division approvals, variances and other permits; and prescribes penalties for violations of the ZDC.Zoning Code Information:City of Tempe Zoning and Development Code

The County zoning is not directly associated to parcels. The zoning polygons are managed separately from parcels therefore the zoning may not be coincidental to a parcel. Some parcels are created with more than one zoning value. for regulation about zoning, please refer to the Development Service Planning and Zoning Ordinance for the unincorporated areas of Yavapai County, Arizona. Please view other information on the Development Services County web page, https://YavapaiAZ.gov/devserv. The web service in WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere (WKID 3857). This data was intended for general location mapping purposes and is not suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. The intended purpose of this published data is for the County mapping application hosted on (gis.yavapai.us) and ArcGIS Online. Using a Map Service to share for Open Data.Access is granted to public agencies, educational institutions, non-profit organizations and private individuals for non-commercial purpose. For commercial use of the data see Arizona Revised Statutes 39-121.03. But per AGIC, Arizona Revised Statutes 27-178 section B in the Geospatial data sharing, "A public agency that shares geospatial data may exempt the data from commercial use fees prescribed in section 39-121.03, subsection A, paragraph 3." Regarding Arizona Revised Statutes 39-121.03 and the OpenData metadata sentence stating, geospatial data may exempt the data from commercial use fees prescribed in section 39-121.03, subsection A, paragraph 3

Digitized zoning maps for three time points during Phoenix’s 20th Century development: 1930-1941 (Phoenix’s original adoption of zoning), 1955 (onset of postwar expansion), and 1970 (major annexation and planning for growth, including the city’s incorporation of large agricultural areas for urban expansion).

The planning map includes the Buckeye Planning Area, Parcels, Annexations, Community Master Plans and Planned Area Developments, Subdivisions, Subdivision Phases, Zoning, General Plan Land Use, Downtown Incentive District and Luke Air Force Base layers. Parcels are scale dependent and draw when you zoom into an area of interest on the map. This application is enabled to allow searching by address through ESRI's database, APN through the parcel layer and for the names of community master plans, subdivisions and subdivision phases.

This map depicts zoning for the Town of Wickenburg, Arizona.

The zoning overlay districts for the City of Buckeye.

The Unpublished Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument and Vicinity, Arizona is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables in a 10.1 file geodatabase (orpi_geology.gdb), a 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (orpi_geology.mxd), individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files for each GIS data layer, an ancillary map information document (orpi_geology.pdf) which contains source map unit descriptions, as well as other source map text, figures and tables, metadata in FGDC text (.txt) and FAQ (.pdf) formats, and a GIS readme file (orpi_geology_gis_readme.pdf). Please read the orpi_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the file geodatabase and other map files. To request GIS data in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format contact Stephanie O'Meara (stephanie.omeara@colostate.edu; see contact information below). The data is also available as a 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. Google Earth software is available for free at: http://www.google.com/earth/index.html. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: Northern Arizona University. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (orpi_geology_metadata.txt or orpi_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 12.2 meters or 40 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm). The GIS data projection is NAD83, UTM Zone 12N, however, for the KML/KMZ format the data is projected upon export to WGS84 Geographic, the native coordinate system used by Google Earth. The data is within the area of interest of Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument.

ADMMR map collection: United Verde Extension 950 Level M-3 Zone; 1 in. to 20 feet; 17 x 17 in.

A Doñana terület nemzeti parkjaira és természeti parkjaira (és azok védőkörzeteire) vonatkozó, rendelettel jóváhagyott, hatályos természetierőforrás-gazdálkodási terveknek (PORN) megfelelő WMS-szolgáltatás. Az egyes sokszögek (GetFeatureInfo) lekérdezésével információt kapunk a hely nevéről, a védőalakzat típusáról, a PORN bejelentésének szabályairól és a BOJA-ban való közzétételének időpontjáról, a védőkörzetek kódjairól és leírásáról, valamint azokban az esetekben, amelyek megfelelnek az egyes PORN-okban meghatározott védelmi alterületek kódjainak és leírásának. Az andalúziai környezeti információs hálózat csomópontja. Andalúzia regionális kormánya. Integrálva az andalúziai téradat-infrastruktúrába, az andalúziai térképészeti rendszer iránymutatásait követve.

This is a polygon feature data layer of United States National Grid (1000m * 1000m polygons ) for Arizona (UTM Zone 12)

ADMMR map collection: United Verde Extension M-3 Zone Section Looking S 45 Degrees W; 1 in. to 20 feet; 24 x 18 in.

In May 2013, the Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center (GCMRC) of the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) Southwest Biological Science Center (SBSC) acquired airborne multispectral high resolution data for the Colorado River in Grand Canyon in Arizona, USA. The imagery data consist of four bands (blue, green, red and near infrared) with a ground resolution of 20 centimeters (cm). These data are available to the public as 16-bit geotiff files. They are projected in the State Plane (SP) map projection using the central Arizona zone (202) and the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83). The assessed accuracy for these data is based on 91 Ground Control Points (GCPs), and is reported at 95% confidence as 0.64 meters (m) and a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.36m. The airborne data acquisition was conducted under contract by Fugro Earthdata Inc. using two fixed wing aircraft from May 25th to 30th, 2013 at altitudes between 2440 meters to 3350 meters above mean sea level. The data delivered by Fugro Earthdata Inc. were checked for smear, shadow extent and water clarity as described for previous image acquisitions in Davis (2012). We then produced a corridor-wide mosaic using the best possible tiles with the least amount of smear, the smallest shadow extent, and clearest, most glint-free water possible. During the mosaic process adjacent tiles sometimes had to be spectrally adjusted to account for differences in date, time, sun angle, weather, and environment. We used the same method as described in Davis (2012) for the spectral adjustment. A horizontal accuracy assessment was completed by Fugro Earthdata Inc. using 188 GCPs provided by GCMRC. The GCPs were marked during the image acquisition with 1m2 diagonally alternated black and white plastic panels centered on control points throughout the river corridor in the GCMRC survey control network (Hazel and others, 2008). The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) accuracy reported by Fugro Earthdata Inc. is 0.17m Easting and 0.15m Northing, or better, depending on the acquisition zone. The 16-bit image data are stored as four band images in embedded geotiff format, which can be read and used by most geographic information system (GIS) and image-processing software. The TIFF world files (tfw) are provided, however they are not needed for many software to read an embedded geotiff image. The image files are projected in the State Plane (SP) 2011, map projection using the central Arizona zone (202) and the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83). A complete detailed description of the methods can be found in the associated USGS Data Series 1027 for these data, https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ds1027.

In May 2021, the Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center (GCMRC) of the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS), Southwest Biological Science Center (SBSC) acquired airborne multispectral high resolution data for the Colorado River in Grand Canyon in Arizona, USA. The imagery data consist of four bands (Band 1 – red, Band 2 – green, Band 3 – blue, and Band 4 – near infrared) with a ground resolution of 20 centimeters (cm). These image data are available to the public as 16-bit GeoTIFF files, which can be read and used by most geographic information system (GIS) and image-processing software. The spatial reference of the image data are in the State Plane (SP) map projection using the central Arizona zone (FIPS 0202) and the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83) National Adjustment of 2011 (NA2011). The airborne data acquisition was conducted under contract by Fugro Earthdata Inc (Fugro) using two fixed wing aircraft from May 29th to June 4th, 2021 at flight altitudes from approximately 2,440 to 3,350 meters above mean sea level. Fugro produced a corridor-wide mosaic using the best possible flight line images with the least amount of smear, the smallest shadow extent, and clearest, most glint-free water possible. The mosaic delivered by Fugro was then further corrected by GCMRC for smear, shadow extent and water clarity as described in the process steps of this metadata and for previous image acquisitions in Durning et al. (2016) and Davis (2012). 47 ground controls points (GCPs) were used to conduct an independent spatial accuracy assessment by GCMRC. The accuracy calculated from the GCPs is reported at 95% confidence as 0.514 m and a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.297 m.

Cross CZO LiDAR. Visit https://dataone.org/datasets/sha256%3A250745824b29ce4a470eefd885d993c52939d3d2853122f1baf5e3a703a8fe3c for complete metadata about this dataset.

ADMMR map collection: Zonia Copper Mine Surface Assay Map Southern Portion of Ore Zone; 1 in. to 40 feet; 20 x 11 in.

USGS is assessing the feasibility of map projections and grid systems for lunar surface operations. We propose developing a new Lunar Transverse Mercator (LTM), the Lunar Polar Stereographic (LPS), and the Lunar Grid Reference Systems (LGRS). We have also designed additional grids to meet NASA requirements for astronaut navigation, referred to as LGRS in Artemis Condensed Coordinates (ACC). This data release includes LGRS grids finer than 25km (1km, 100m, and 10m) in ACC format for a small number of terrestrial analog sites of interest. The grids contained in this data release are projected in the terrestrial Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) Projected Coordinate Reference System (PCRS) using the World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84) as its reference datum. A small number of geotiffs used to related the linear distortion the UTM and WGS84 systems imposes on the analog sites include: 1) a clipped USGS Nation Elevation Dataset (NED) Digital Elevation Model (DEM); 2) the grid scale factor of the UTM zone the data is projected in, 3) the height factor based on the USGS NED DEM, 4) the combined factor, and 5) linear distortion calculated in parts-per-million (PPM). Geotiffs are projected from WGS84 in a UTM PCRS zone. Distortion calculations are based on the methods State Plane Coordinate System of 2022. See Dennis (2021; https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/fig2023/papers/cinema03/CINEMA03_dennis_12044.pdf) for more information. Coarser grids, (>=25km) such as the lunar LTM, LPS, and LGRS grids are not released here but may be acceded from https://doi.org/10.5066/P13YPWQD and displayed using a lunar datum. LTM, LPS, and LGRS are similar in design and use to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM), Universal Polar Stereographic (LPS), and Military Grid Reference System (MGRS), but adhere to NASA requirements. LGRS ACC format is similar in design and structure to historic Army Mapping Service Apollo orthotopophoto charts for navigation. Terrestrial Locations and associated LGRS ACC Grids and Files: Projection Location Files UTM 11N Yucca Flat 1km Grid Shapefile 100m Grid Shapefile 10m Grid Shapefile USGS 1/3" DEM Geotiff UTM Projection Scale Factor Geotiff Map Height Factor Geotiff Map Combined Factor Geotiff Map Linear Distortion Geotiff UTM 12N Buffalo Park 1km Grid Shapefile 100m Grid Shapefile 10m Grid Shapefile USGS 1/3" DEM Geotiff UTM Projection Scale Factor Geotiff Map Height Factor Geotiff Map Combined Factor Geotiff Map Linear Distortion Geotiff Cinder Lake 1km Grid Shapefile 100m Grid Shapefile 10m Grid Shapefile USGS 1/3" DEM Geotiff UTM Projection Scale Factor Geotiff Map Height Factor Geotiff Map Combined Factor Geotiff Map Linear Distortion Geotiff JETT3 Arizona 1km Grid Shapefile 100m Grid Shapefile 10m Grid Shapefile USGS 1/3" DEM Geotiff UTM Projection Scale Factor Geotiff Map Height Factor Geotiff Map Combined Factor Geotiff Map Linear Distortion Geotiff JETT5 Arizona 1km Grid Shapefile 100m Grid Shapefile 10m Grid Shapefile USGS 1/3" DEM Geotiff UTM Projection Scale Factor Geotiff Map Height Factor Geotiff Map Combined Factor Geotiff Map Linear Distortion Geotiff Meteor Crater 1km Grid Shapefile 100m Grid Shapefile 10m Grid Shapefile USGS 1/3" DEM Geotiff UTM Projection Scale Factor Geotiff Map Height Factor Geotiff Map Combined Factor Geotiff Map Linear Distortion Geotiff UTM 13N HAATS 1km Grid Shapefile 100m Grid Shapefile 10m Grid Shapefile 1km Grid Shapefile Derby LZ Clip 100m Grid Shapefile Derby LZ Clip 10m Grid Shapefile Derby LZ Clip 1km Grid Shapefile Eagle County Regional Airport KEGE Clip 100m Grid Shapefile Eagle County Regional Airport KEGE Clip 10m Grid Shapefile Eagle County Regional Airport KEGE Clip 1km Grid Shapefile Windy Point LZ Clip 100m Grid Shapefile Windy Point LZ Clip 10m Grid Shapefile Windy Point LZ Clip USGS 1/3" DEM Geotiff UTM Projection Scale Factor Geotiff Map Height Factor Geotiff Map Combined Factor Geotiff Map Linear Distortion Geotiff UTM 15N Johnson Space Center 1km Grid Shapefile 100m Grid Shapefile 10m Grid Shapefile USGS 1/3" DEM Geotiff UTM Projection Scale Factor Geotiff Map Height Factor Geotiff Map Combined Factor Geotiff Map Linear Distortion Geotiff UTM 28N JETT2 Icelandic Highlands 1km Grid Shapefile 100m Grid Shapefile 10m Grid Shapefile USGS 1/3" DEM Geotiff UTM Projection Scale Factor Geotiff Map Height Factor Geotiff Map Combined Factor Geotiff Map Linear Distortion Geotiff The shapefiles and rasters utilize UTM projections. For GIS utilization of grid shapefiles projected in Lunar Latitude and Longitude should utilize a registered PCRS. To select the correct UTM EPSG code, determine the zone based on longitude (zones are 6° wide, numbered 1–60 from 180°W) and hemisphere (Northern Hemisphere uses EPSG:326XX; Southern Hemisphere uses EPSG:327XX), where XX is the zone number. For display in display in latitude and longitude, select a correct WGS84 EPSG code, such as EPSG:4326. Note: The Lunar Transverse Mercator (LTM) projection system is a globalized set of lunar map projections that divides the Moon into zones to provide a uniform coordinate system for accurate spatial representation. It uses a Transverse Mercator projection, which maps the Moon into 45 transverse Mercator strips, each 8°, longitude, wide. These Transverse Mercator strips are subdivided at the lunar equator for a total of 90 zones. Forty-five in the northern hemisphere and forty-five in the south. LTM specifies a topocentric, rectangular, coordinate system (easting and northing coordinates) for spatial referencing. This projection is commonly used in GIS and surveying for its ability to represent large areas with high positional accuracy while maintaining consistent scale. The Lunar Polar Stereographic (LPS) projection system contains projection specifications for the Moon’s polar regions. It uses a polar stereographic projection, which maps the polar regions onto an azimuthal plane. The LPS system contains 2 zones, each zone is located at the northern and southern poles and is referred to as the LPS northern or LPS southern zone. LPS, like its equatorial counterpart LTM, specifies a topocentric, rectangular, coordinate system (easting and northing coordinates) for spatial referencing. This projection is commonly used in GIS and surveying for its ability to represent large polar areas with high positional accuracy while maintaining consistent scale across the map region. LGRS is a globalized grid system for lunar navigation supported by the LTM and LPS projections. LGRS provides an alphanumeric grid coordinate structure for both the LTM and LPS systems. This labeling structure is utilized similarly to MGRS. LGRS defines a global area grid based on latitude and longitude and a 25×25 km grid based on LTM and LPS coordinate values. Two implementations of LGRS are used as polar areas require an LPS projection and equatorial areas a Transverse Mercator. We describe the differences in the techniques and methods reported in this data release. Request McClernan et. al. (in-press) for more information. ACC is a method of simplifying LGRS coordinates and is similar in use to the Army Mapping Service Apollo orthotopophoto charts for navigation. These grids are designed to condense a full LGRS coordinate to a relative coordinate of 6 characters in length. LGRS in ACC format is completed by imposing a 1km grid within the LGRS 25km grid, then truncating the grid precision to 10m. To me the character limit, a coordinate is reported as a relative value to the lower-left corner of the 25km LGRS zone without the zone information; However, zone information can be reported. As implemented, and 25km^2 area on the lunar surface will have a set of a unique set of ACC coordinates to report locations The shape files provided in this data release are projected in the LTM or LPS PCRSs and must utilize these projections to be dimensioned correctly.

Approved area plans in the City of Buckeye.

Geologic map and cross section of the Cleator shear zone of Yavapai County, Arizona.

Base zoning classifications. Does not include overlay zoning. Incorporated PAD Zoning in undeveloped PAD areas. Zones extend to the center of roads in most cases or parcel boundaries.

Detailed Geologic map and cross sections of the Ramsay Mine Area, southeastern Plomosa Mountains, West-central Arizona. Report and two map sheets, scale 1:12,000, with cross-sections.Locations of altered or mineralized rocks, mines and prospects are indicated on the geologic map, two examples below.1. Black Mesa mine of Keith 1978. Tunnels andshaft in brecciated fault zone between Redwall and Martin formations. Waste heap contains massive12and comb-structured silica-FeOx vein material, as well as spongy quartz-limonite (after pyrite)stockwork. Sparse malachite and chrysocolla fill open space in refractured silica-FeOx veins.Brecciated quartz vein material with silica-FeOx cement also present. In shaft on SE side of canyonmineralized breccia zones in carbonate are irregular and lenticular, with both steep and gentle dip.Adjacent carbonate rocks show little evidence of alteration. Keith [1978] describes 'spotty cerrusite,anglesite, galena, chrysocolla, malachite, and brochantite,with siderite, quartz, ankerite, calcite andlimonite in lensing replacement deposits in steeply dipping Paleozoic limestone beds. Cellular boxworkand vugs. Some native copper and cerargyrite '. Available production data through 1981 indicate thatthe ore produced contained about 11 % lead, 3.5% copper, 7 oz/ton of silver, and .2 oz/ton of gold[Arizona Geologic Survey, unpublished data].2. Shaft in fault, oriented 134/64 NE, between Redwall and Supai Formations. Massive, densesilica-hematite in irregular clots along fault zone. Also earthy hematite along fractures. A few lenses ofsericitized Bolsa quartzite are present in the fault zone, otherwise alteration outside of fault zone isminimal. (Same location as site #16 of Richard [1992])