Facebook
TwitterEach record in this dataset shows information about an arrest executed by the Chicago Police Department (CPD). Source data comes from the CPD Automated Arrest application. This electronic application is part of the CPD CLEAR (Citizen Law Enforcement Analysis and Reporting) system, and is used to process arrests Department-wide.
A more-detailed version of this dataset is available to media by request. To make a request, please email dataportal@cityofchicago.org with the subject line: Arrests Access Request. Access will require an account on this site, which you may create at https://data.cityofchicago.org/signup. New data fields may be added to this public dataset in the future. Requests for individual arrest reports or any other related data other than access to the more-detailed dataset should be directed to CPD, through contact information on that site or a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
The data is limited to adult arrests, defined as any arrest where the arrestee was 18 years of age or older on the date of arrest. The data excludes arrest records expunged by CPD pursuant to the Illinois Criminal Identification Act (20 ILCS 2630/5.2).
Department members use charges that appear in Illinois Compiled Statutes or Municipal Code of Chicago. Arrestees may be charged with multiple offenses from these sources. Each record in the dataset includes up to four charges, ordered by severity and with CHARGE1 as the most severe charge. Severity is defined based on charge class and charge type, criteria that are routinely used by Illinois court systems to determine penalties for conviction. In case of a tie, charges are presented in the order that the arresting officer listed the charges on the arrest report. By policy, Department members are provided general instructions to emphasize seriousness of the offense when ordering charges on an arrest report.
Each record has an additional set of columns where a charge characteristic (statute, description, type, or class) for all four charges, or fewer if there were not four charges, is concatenated with the | character. These columns can be used with the Filter function's "Contains" operator to find all records where a value appears, without having to search four separate columns.
Users interested in learning more about CPD arrest processes can review current directives, using the CPD Automated Directives system (http://directives.chicagopolice.org/directives/). Relevant directives include:
• Special Order S06-01-11 – CLEAR Automated Arrest System: describes the application used by Department members to enter arrest data. • Special Order S06-01-04 – Arrestee Identification Process: describes processes related to obtaining and using CB numbers. • Special Order S09-03-04 – Assignment and Processing of Records Division Numbers: describes processes related to obtaining and using RD numbers. • Special Order 06-01 – Processing Persons Under Department Control: describes required tasks associated with arrestee processing, include the requirement that Department members order charges based on severity.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset provides the public with arrest information from the Montgomery County Central Processing Unit (CPU) systems. The data presented is derived from every booking; criminal, civil and motor vehicle entered through CPU. The data is compiled by “CRIMS”, a respected jail records-management system used by the Montgomery County Corrections and many other law enforcement agencies. To protect arrestee’s privacy, personal information is redacted. Residential addresses are rounded to the nearest hundred block. All data is refreshed on 2 hour basis to reflect any additions or changes. -Information that may include mechanical or human error -Arrest information [Note: all arrested persons are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law - Records will be removed after 30 days. Update Frequency - every 2 hours
Facebook
TwitterArrest data contains information on people taken into custody by City of Pittsburgh police officers. More serious crimes such as felony offenses are more likely to result in an arrest. However, arrests can occur as a result of other offenses, such as parole violations or a failure to appear for trial. All data is reported at the block/intersection level, with the exception of sex crimes, which are reported at the police zone level. This dataset only contains information reported by City of Pittsburgh Police. It does not contain information about incidents that solely involve other police departments operating within the city (for example, campus police or Port Authority police). More documentation is available in our Crime Data Guide.
Facebook
TwitterU.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
This data set contains data from individuals arrested by a police officer in Montgomery County, including whether the arrest location is within 500 feet of a school. Update Frequency: Daily
Facebook
TwitterIn 2023, the FBI arrested ***** people for animal cruelty in the United States. In that year, the majority of people were arrested for assault offenses, with ********* people arrested by the FBI.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This data ceased updating with the transition to a new records management system on 11/14/2023. Access to the updated data set has been added as of April 11, 2025 here: Crime Data Guide.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
*This data is updated nightly from the Police Reporting Server housed at the ECC every day at 11:59PM.Arrest data contains information on people taken into custody by City of Charlottesville police officers. More serious crimes such as felony offenses are more likely to result in an arrest. However, arrests can occur as a result of other offenses, such as parole violations or a failure to appear for trial.This dataset only contains information reported by City of Charlottesville Police. It does not contain information about incidents that solely involve other police departments operating within the city (for example, University of Virginia police or Albemarle County police).
Facebook
TwitterThe Metropolitan Police in London arrested 96,426 people in 2023/24, by far the most of any police force in England and Wales. Greater Manchester Police made 47,611 arrests in this reporting year, the second-highest in England and Wales.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset reflects reported incidents of crime (with the exception of murders where data exists for each victim) that occurred in the City of Chicago from 2001 to present, minus the most recent seven days. Data is extracted from the Chicago Police Department's CLEAR (Citizen Law Enforcement Analysis and Reporting) system. In order to protect the privacy of crime victims, addresses are shown at the block level only and specific locations are not identified. Should you have questions about this dataset, you may contact the Research & Development Division of the Chicago Police Department at 312.745.6071 or RandD@chicagopolice.org. Disclaimer: These crimes may be based upon preliminary information supplied to the Police Department by the reporting parties that have not been verified. The preliminary crime classifications may be changed at a later date based upon additional investigation and there is always the possibility of mechanical or human error. Therefore, the Chicago Police Department does not guarantee (either expressed or implied) the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or correct sequencing of the information and the information should not be used for comparison purposes over time. The Chicago Police Department will not be responsible for any error or omission, or for the use of, or the results obtained from the use of this information. All data visualizations on maps should be considered approximate and attempts to derive specific addresses are strictly prohibited. The Chicago Police Department is not responsible for the content of any off-site pages that are referenced by or that reference this web page other than an official City of Chicago or Chicago Police Department web page. The user specifically acknowledges that the Chicago Police Department is not responsible for any defamatory, offensive, misleading, or illegal conduct of other users, links, or third parties and that the risk of injury from the foregoing rests entirely with the user. The unauthorized use of the words "Chicago Police Department," "Chicago Police," or any colorable imitation of these words or the unauthorized use of the Chicago Police Department logo is unlawful. This web page does not, in any way, authorize such use. Data is updated daily Tuesday through Sunday. The dataset contains more than 65,000 records/rows of data and cannot be viewed in full in Microsoft Excel. Therefore, when downloading the file, select CSV from the Export menu. Open the file in an ASCII text editor, such as Wordpad, to view and search. To access a list of Chicago Police Department - Illinois Uniform Crime Reporting (IUCR) codes, go to http://data.cityofchicago.org/Public-Safety/Chicago-Police-Department-Illinois-Uniform-Crime-R/c7ck-438e
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The Metropolitan Police Department collects race and ethnicity data according to the United States Census Bureau standards (https://www.census.gov/topics/population/race/about.html). Hispanic, which was previously categorized under the Race field prior to August 2015, is now captured under Ethnicity. All records prior to August 2015 have been updated to “Unknown (Race), Hispanic (Ethnicity)”. Race, ethnicity and gender data are based on officer observation, which may or may not be accurate.MPD cannot release exact addresses to the general public unless proof of ownership or subpoena is submitted. The GeoX and GeoY values represent the block location (approximately 232 ft. radius) as of the date of the arrest and offense. Arrest and offense addresses that could not be geocoded are included as an “unknown” value.Arrestee age is calculated based on the number of days between the self-reported or verified date of birth (DOB) of the arrestee and the date of the arrest; DOB data may not be accurate if self-reported, and an arrestee may refuse to provide his or her date of birth. Due to the sensitive nature of juvenile data and to protect the arrestee’s confidentiality, any arrest records for defendants under the age of 18 or with missing age are excluded in this dataset.The Criminal Complaint Number (CCN) and arrest number have also been anonymized.This data may not match other arrest data requests that may have included all law enforcement agencies in the District or all arrest charges. Arrest totals are subject to change and may be different than MPD Annual Report totals or other publications due to inclusion of juvenile arrest summary, expungements, investigation updates, data quality audits, etc.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset consists of public records requests made by the Washington Post to police departments that oversee security at each NFL stadium.
Twenty-nine of the 31 jurisdictions provided at least partial data, though reporting methods differed from agency to agency; Cleveland and New Orleans did not submit data. Certain data were omitted if found to be incomplete or unreliable. Among those jurisdictions sending partial arrest figures for home games between 2011 and 2015 were Buffalo, Miami and Oakland. St. Louis provided only year-by-year arrest data, rather than game-by-game numbers. Detroit, Minneapolis and Atlanta did not provide data for arrests that took place in stadium parking lots.
The main dataset includes fields such as the day of the week, which teams were playing on which home field, and the score of the game, between 2011 and 2015.
Data was collected and reported by Kent Babb and Steven Rich of the Washington Post, and the original dataset can be found here.
Facebook
TwitterOf the ******* arrests in England and Wales in 2024/25, the most common type of offence that people were arrested for was violence against the person, with almost ******* people arrested for this type of offence.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.usa.gov/government-works/https://www.usa.gov/government-works/
This dataset contains the monthly number of reported arrests for various offenses reported by participating law enforcement agencies from 1995. The arrests are by offense and broken down by age and sex or age and race. Not all agencies report race and/or ethnicity for arrests but they must report age and sex. Note that only agencies that have reported arrests for 12 months of the year are represented in the annual counts that are included in the database. Download this dataset to see totals of reported arrests for the nation from 1995–2016.
Facebook
TwitterThe counts of arrests are derived from information transmitted from law enforcement agencies to the Division of Criminal Justice Services Computerized Criminal History database for fingerprintable offenses.An adult arrest is defined as an arrest of a person 16 years old or older or a juvenile offender prosecuted in adult court. Fingerprintable offenses (defined in Criminal Procedure Law §160.10) include any felony, a misdemeanor defined in the penal law, a misdemeanor defined outside the penal law which would constitute a felony if such a person had a previous judgment of conviction for a crime, or loitering for the purpose of engaging in prostitution as defined in subdivision two of Penal Law §240.37.
Facebook
TwitterFrom 2018 to 2023, ***** people were arrested by the police in drug trafficking related operations. In 2018, the most people were arrested, with ***. Since then, the number of arrests has been decreasing, with *** individuals arrested in 2023.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset represents all arrests that occurred in the last 24 hours as recorded by the Norfolk Police Department. This dataset is updated daily.
Facebook
TwitterThis ArcGIS Online dashboard provides key indicators of arrest activity in Tempe for the past 90 days. "Total Arrests" may include the same individual more than once, while "Individuals Arrested" counts unique people, some of whom may have been arrested multiple times. "Arresting Officers" reflects the number of different officers involved in arrests, and "Charges" includes all charges filed, where multiple charges may stem from a single arrest event. For full details and historical trends, visit the Recent and Historic Arrest Demographics dashboards on the Arrest Demographics Hub page. The dashboard is featured on the Tempe Police Data Hub and is updated regularly to reflect the latest arrest activity.For detailed guidance, please refer to the User Guide: Arrests Demographics Hub Page.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Police arrest reports data
Facebook
TwitterU.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
DATASET DESCRIPTION: When an officer finds it necessary to arrest an individual, such as upon witnessing a crime, having probable cause, or acting on a judge-issued arrest warrant, they are required to write an arrest report. The arrest report details the conditions of the arrest and directly pertains to the individual in question. Additionally, it includes specific details of the charges associated with the arrest.
GENERAL ORDERS RELATED TO ARRESTS Austin Police General Order 319 states, "This order outlines the guidelines for warrant and warrantless arrests. The following order cannot address every situation that an officer might encounter; however, in exercising arrest authority, officers should be guided by what is contained in this document. Nothing in this order should be interpreted as authorizing or restricting an officer's arrest authority as defined by the Code of Criminal Procedure."
AUSTIN POLICE DATA DISCLAIMER 1. The data provided is for informational use only and may differ from official Austin Police crime data.
APD’s databases are continuously updated, and changes can be made due to a variety of investigative factors including but not limited to offense reclassification and dates.
Reports run at different times may produce different results. Care should be taken when comparing against other reports as different data collection methods and different systems of record may have been used.
APD does not assume any liability for any decision made or action taken or not taken by the recipient in reliance upon any information or data provided.
City of Austin Open Data Terms of Use - https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/ranj-cccq
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/AssetFactory.aspx?did=69351https://www.scottsdaleaz.gov/AssetFactory.aspx?did=69351
Please click here to view the Data Dictionary, a description of the fields in this table.The police arrest report generates from the police department (Record Management System (RMS)) and includes one rolling year of data. Information automatically updates Sunday night. The most recent data available will begin one week prior from the updated date to allow for report approvals, ensuring the most accurate information available. Incidents included may not directly correlate to information found in other data sets nor should this data be considered for official Uniform Crime Reporting. For all official crime statistics please refer to the FBI and Arizona Department of Public Safety.Some information has been excluded and addresses shortened to the hundred block to protect privacy of victims and juveniles.
Facebook
TwitterEach record in this dataset shows information about an arrest executed by the Chicago Police Department (CPD). Source data comes from the CPD Automated Arrest application. This electronic application is part of the CPD CLEAR (Citizen Law Enforcement Analysis and Reporting) system, and is used to process arrests Department-wide.
A more-detailed version of this dataset is available to media by request. To make a request, please email dataportal@cityofchicago.org with the subject line: Arrests Access Request. Access will require an account on this site, which you may create at https://data.cityofchicago.org/signup. New data fields may be added to this public dataset in the future. Requests for individual arrest reports or any other related data other than access to the more-detailed dataset should be directed to CPD, through contact information on that site or a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
The data is limited to adult arrests, defined as any arrest where the arrestee was 18 years of age or older on the date of arrest. The data excludes arrest records expunged by CPD pursuant to the Illinois Criminal Identification Act (20 ILCS 2630/5.2).
Department members use charges that appear in Illinois Compiled Statutes or Municipal Code of Chicago. Arrestees may be charged with multiple offenses from these sources. Each record in the dataset includes up to four charges, ordered by severity and with CHARGE1 as the most severe charge. Severity is defined based on charge class and charge type, criteria that are routinely used by Illinois court systems to determine penalties for conviction. In case of a tie, charges are presented in the order that the arresting officer listed the charges on the arrest report. By policy, Department members are provided general instructions to emphasize seriousness of the offense when ordering charges on an arrest report.
Each record has an additional set of columns where a charge characteristic (statute, description, type, or class) for all four charges, or fewer if there were not four charges, is concatenated with the | character. These columns can be used with the Filter function's "Contains" operator to find all records where a value appears, without having to search four separate columns.
Users interested in learning more about CPD arrest processes can review current directives, using the CPD Automated Directives system (http://directives.chicagopolice.org/directives/). Relevant directives include:
• Special Order S06-01-11 – CLEAR Automated Arrest System: describes the application used by Department members to enter arrest data. • Special Order S06-01-04 – Arrestee Identification Process: describes processes related to obtaining and using CB numbers. • Special Order S09-03-04 – Assignment and Processing of Records Division Numbers: describes processes related to obtaining and using RD numbers. • Special Order 06-01 – Processing Persons Under Department Control: describes required tasks associated with arrestee processing, include the requirement that Department members order charges based on severity.