A map showing Asian American historic properties in the city of Phoenix, featuring point and polygon features. This map is featured in the City of Phoenix Historic Preservation Office's Tour Phoenix's Asian American Heritage Story Map.Please visit our story maps at https://www.phoenix.gov/pdd/story-maps.

MORE RECENT DATA AVAILABLE HERE.This layer contains estimates and margins of error for 21 different Asian ethnicities by tract centroids. Data is from American Community Survey 2012-2016 5-year estimates, Table B02018. Ethnicities/fields are: Asian Indian, Bangladeshi, Bhutanese, Burmese, Cambodian, Chinese (except Taiwanese), Filipino, Hmong, Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, Laotian, Malaysian, Mongolian, Nepalese, Okinawan, Pakistani, Sri Lankan, Taiwanese, Thai, Vietnamese, Other Asian - specified, and Other Asian - not specified.A filter is applied so that only tracts with at least 3 Asian Americans are displayed. Layer is symbolized with red firefly proportionally-graduated symbols, meant for a dark basemap. Accompanying web map also available.Nationally, the estimates and margins of error for these detailed Asian ethnicities are below: United StatesEstimateMargin of ErrorTotal Groups Tallied:20,337,346+/-27,363Asian Indian3,746,270+/-19,968Bangladeshi170,747+/-5,251Bhutanese27,399+/-2,669Burmese150,087+/-5,408Cambodian317,931+/-7,693Chinese, except Taiwanese4,558,129+/-24,665Filipino3,772,868+/-22,409Hmong289,461+/-5,593Indonesian110,286+/-4,239Japanese1,413,802+/-16,600Korean1,795,614+/-14,740Laotian262,832+/-6,798Malaysian30,626+/-1,882Mongolian22,390+/-1,940Nepalese126,668+/-5,072Okinawan12,614+/-1,057Pakistani476,963+/-11,358Sri Lankan54,260+/-2,685Taiwanese181,683+/-5,393Thai280,835+/-6,834Vietnamese1,948,720+/-20,616Other Asian, specified7,252+/-842Other Asian, not specified579,909+/-9,235

The percentage of persons, out of the total number of persons living in an area, self-identifying as Asian (and non-Hispanic). “Asian” refers to a person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent, including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey Years Available: 2010, 2011-2015, 2012-2016, 2013-2017, 2014-2018, 2015-2019, 2020, 2017-2021, 2018-2022, 2019-2023Please note: We do not recommend comparing overlapping years of data due to the nature of this dataset. For more information, please visit: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/guidance/comparing-acs-data.html

This map shows density surfaces derived from the 2010 US Census block points.This data shows % of people who identified themselves as single race and whiteThe block points were interpolated using the density function to a 2km x 2km grid of the continental US (with water and coastal data masks). There are many stories in these Maps:- What is that clean North/South Line through the center? Why do so many people live East of that line?- Notice the paths of the towns in the west – why are they so linear? And it seems there is a pattern to the spaces between the towns, why?- Looking at the ethnic maps, what explains the patterns? Look at the % Native American map – what are the areas of higher values? (note I did not make a % Asian map as at this scale there was not enough % to show any significant clusters.)

This layer shows Asian alone or in any combination by selected groups. This is shown by tract, county, and state boundaries. This service is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis. The numbers by detailed Asian groups do not add to the total population. This is because the detailed Asian groups are tallies of the number of Asian responses rather than the number of Asian respondents. Responses that include more than one race and/or Asian group are counted several times. To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right. Current Vintage: 2019-2023ACS Table(s): B02001, B02011, B02018 (Not all lines of ACS table B02001 are available in this layer.)Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: December 12, 2024National Figures: data.census.govThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. For more information about ACS layers, visit the FAQ. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:This layer is updated automatically when the most current vintage of ACS data is released each year, usually in December. The layer always contains the latest available ACS 5-year estimates. It is updated annually within days of the Census Bureau's release schedule. Click here to learn more about ACS data releases.Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases, specifically, the National Sub-State Geography Database (named tlgdb_(year)_a_us_substategeo.gdb). Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines erased for cartographic and mapping purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2020 Areal Hydrography boundaries offered by TIGER. Water bodies and rivers which are 50 million square meters or larger (mid to large sized water bodies) are erased from the tract level boundaries, as well as additional important features. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 2023 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. These are erased to more accurately portray the coastlines and Great Lakes. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters).The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto RicoCensus tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -4444...) have been set to null, with the exception of -5555... which has been set to zero. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

This layer shows Asian alone or in any combination by selected groups. This is shown by tract, county, and state centroids. This service is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis. The numbers by detailed Asian groups do not add to the total population. This is because the detailed Asian groups are tallies of the number of Asian responses rather than the number of Asian respondents. Responses that include more than one race and/or Asian group are counted several times. To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right. Current Vintage: 2019-2023ACS Table(s): B02001, B02011, B02018 (Not all lines of ACS table B02001 are available in this layer.)Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: December 12, 2024National Figures: data.census.govThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. For more information about ACS layers, visit the FAQ. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:This layer is updated automatically when the most current vintage of ACS data is released each year, usually in December. The layer always contains the latest available ACS 5-year estimates. It is updated annually within days of the Census Bureau's release schedule. Click here to learn more about ACS data releases.Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases, specifically, the National Sub-State Geography Database (named tlgdb_(year)_a_us_substategeo.gdb). Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines erased for cartographic and mapping purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2020 Areal Hydrography boundaries offered by TIGER. Water bodies and rivers which are 50 million square meters or larger (mid to large sized water bodies) are erased from the tract level boundaries, as well as additional important features. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 2023 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. These are erased to more accurately portray the coastlines and Great Lakes. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters).The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto RicoCensus tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -4444...) have been set to null, with the exception of -5555... which has been set to zero. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

For the past several censuses, the Census Bureau has invited people to self-respond before following up in-person using census takers. The 2010 Census invited people to self-respond predominately by returning paper questionnaires in the mail. The 2020 Census allows people to self-respond in three ways: online, by phone, or by mail.The 2020 Census self-response rates are self-response rates for current census geographies. These rates are the daily and cumulative self-response rates for all housing units that received invitations to self-respond to the 2020 Census. The 2020 Census self-response rates are available for states, counties, census tracts, congressional districts, towns and townships, consolidated cities, incorporated places, tribal areas, and tribal census tracts.The Self-Response Rate of Los Angeles County is 65.1% for 2020 Census, which is slightly lower than 69.6% of California State rate.More information about these data is available in the Self-Response Rates Map Data and Technical Documentation document associated with the 2020 Self-Response Rates Map or review FAQs.Animated Self-Response Rate 2010 vs 2020 is available at ESRI site SRR Animated Maps and can explore Census 2020 SRR data at ESRI Demographic site Census 2020 SSR Data.Following Demographic Characteristics are included in this data and web maps to visualize their relationships with Census Self-Response Rate (SRR).1. Population Density: 2020 Population per square mile,2. Poverty Rate: Percentage of population under 100% FPL,3. Median Household income: Based on countywide median HH income of $71,538.4. Highschool Education Attainment: Percentage of 18 years and older population without high school graduation.5. English Speaking Ability: Percentage of 18 years and older population with less or none English speaking ability. 6. Household without Internet Access: Percentage of HH without internet access.7. Non-Hispanic White Population: Percentage of Non-Hispanic White population.8. Non-Hispanic African-American Population: Percentage of Non-Hispanic African-American population.9. Non-Hispanic Asian Population: Percentage of Non-Hispanic Asian population.10. Hispanic Population: Percentage of Hispanic population.

This layer contains information on technology access by Household. Data is from US Census American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates.This layer represents the underlying data for several data visualizations on the Tempe Equity Map.Data visualized as a percent of total population in households in given census tract.Values shown of -999 represent no data for those cells.Layer includes:Key demographicsTotal Population in Households % Broadband Internet Subscription: American Indian and Alaska Native alone% Broadband Internet Subscription: Asian Alone% Broadband Internet Subscription: Black or African American alone% Broadband Internet Subscription: Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone% Broadband Internet Subscription: White Alone% Broadband Internet Subscription: Hispanic or Latino origin% Without an internet Subscription: American Indian and Alaska Native alone% Without an internet Subscription: Asian alone% Without an internet Subscription: Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone% Without an internet Subscription: Black or African American Alone% Without an internet Subscription: White Alone% Without an internet Subscription: Hispanic or Latino origin% No computer in household: American Indian and Alaska native alone% No computer in household: Asian alone% No computer in household: Black or African American alone% No computer in household: Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander% No computer in household: White Alone% No computer in household: Hispanic or Latino origin Current Vintage: 2017-2021ACS Table(s): S2802 (Not all lines of this ACS table are available in this feature layer.)Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of Census update: Dec 8, 2022Data Preparation: Data table downloaded and joined with Census Tract boundaries that are within or adjacent to the City of Tempe boundaryNational Figures: data.census.gov

Use this application to view the pattern of concentrations of people by race and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. Data are provided at the U.S. Census block group level, one of the smallest Census geographies, to provide a detailed picture of these patterns. The data is sourced from the U.S Census Bureau, 2020 Census Redistricting Data (Public Law 94-171) Summary File. Definitions: Definitions of the Census Bureau’s categories are provided below. This interactive map shows patterns for all categories except American Indian or Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. The total population countywide for these two categories is small (1,582 and 263 respectively). The Census Bureau uses the following race categories:Population by RaceWhite – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.Black or African American – A person having origins in any of the Black racial groups of Africa.American Indian or Alaska Native – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central America) and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment.Asian – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam.Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific Islands.Some Other Race - this category is chosen by people who do not identify with any of the categories listed above. People can identify with more than one race. These people are included in the Two or More Races Hispanic or Latino PopulationThe Hispanic/Latino population is an ethnic group. Hispanic/Latino people may be of any race.Other layers provided in this tool included the Loudoun County Census block groups, towns and Dulles airport, and the Loudoun County 2021 aerial imagery.

This dataset identifies race in detail by zip code tabulation areas within the United States. The dataset resulted from the American Community Survey (ACS) conducted from 2010 through 2014. The races included in this dataset are White, Black or African American, American Indian and Alaskan Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander, and others. The ACS also looks at races as stand-alone, and two or more races combined.

Hello, my name is Joie Ha from Denver, CO. I am testifying today on behalf of the AAPI (Asian American and Pacific Islander) communities in Colorado as a whole. I have been working in activism and community organizing for AAPIs in Colorado for over 15 years. Currently, I run a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion firm called CORE: Community Organizing for Radical Empathy. I want to strongly encourage the commission to protect the AAPI community of interest. Statewide the AAPI community makes up 5% of the population in Colorado according to the recent 2020 Census. Because our population is not as numerous as other groups, it is vital that our communities are kept together to preserve our interests and ensure that our voices are being heard. Although we make up only 5% statewide, there are still ethnic enclaves across Colorado that see a large percentage of AAPIs. It is vital that these enclaves are kept within the same districts so that we can continue to advocate for ourselves. Historically, we can see why it is important that our populations are kept together. In 1992 after the LA uprisings and riots, the city of LA saw damages of over $1 billion, most of which was concentrated into the businesses operated by Koreans and other Asian immigrants in Koreatown. Unfortunately, Koreatown was split into four separate City Council districts and five State Assembly districts. Because of this, when it came to cleanup and recovery, elected officials all passed on responsibility because Asian Americans did not make up a ‘significant portion’ of their district.

As you can tell, these district lines can be incredibly damaging for smaller

communities of interest. As a result, we have attached several recommendations to the preliminary maps that cover the congressional, state house, and state senate maps to these comments. These recommendations are meant to keep our communities together and ensure that we have an opportunity to participate in our civic processes in an equitable way. Namely, we want to keep our communities in Aurora, Denver, and Colorado Springs together. We also want to protect our business districts like Little Saigon, the upcoming Korea Town, and Havana Business Improvement District.

We also want to voice our support for CLLARO’s (Colorado Latino

Leadership Advocacy & Research Organization) maps as their lines often align with our recommendations save for a few instances. Furthermore, I want to ask the commission to consider expanding outreach to marginalized communities for public comment, and increasing the amount of public hearings after the revised maps are drawn. As staffers did not consider community of interests in the preliminary maps, and as the 2020 Census redistricting data was only released recently on August 12, this would allow more equitable input from marginalized groups. Thank you for your time.

In the middle of 2023, about 60 percent of the global population was living in Asia.The total world population amounted to 8.1 billion people on the planet. In other words 4.7 billion people were living in Asia as of 2023. Global populationDue to medical advances, better living conditions and the increase of agricultural productivity, the world population increased rapidly over the past century, and is expected to continue to grow. After reaching eight billion in 2023, the global population is estimated to pass 10 billion by 2060. Africa expected to drive population increase Most of the future population increase is expected to happen in Africa. The countries with the highest population growth rate in 2024 were mostly African countries. While around 1.47 billion people live on the continent as of 2024, this is forecast to grow to 3.9 billion by 2100. This is underlined by the fact that most of the countries wit the highest population growth rate are found in Africa. The growing population, in combination with climate change, puts increasing pressure on the world's resources.

This layer shows Asian alone or in any combination by selected groups. This is shown by tract, county, and state centroids. This service is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis. The numbers by detailed Asian groups do not add to the total population. This is because the detailed Asian groups are tallies of the number of Asian responses rather than the number of Asian respondents. Responses that include more than one race and/or Asian group are counted several times. To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right. Current Vintage: 2019-2023ACS Table(s): B02001, B02011, B02018 (Not all lines of ACS table B02001 are available in this layer.)Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: December 12, 2024National Figures: data.census.govThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. For more information about ACS layers, visit the FAQ. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:This layer is updated automatically when the most current vintage of ACS data is released each year, usually in December. The layer always contains the latest available ACS 5-year estimates. It is updated annually within days of the Census Bureau's release schedule. Click here to learn more about ACS data releases.Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases, specifically, the National Sub-State Geography Database (named tlgdb_(year)_a_us_substategeo.gdb). Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines erased for cartographic and mapping purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2020 Areal Hydrography boundaries offered by TIGER. Water bodies and rivers which are 50 million square meters or larger (mid to large sized water bodies) are erased from the tract level boundaries, as well as additional important features. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 2023 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. These are erased to more accurately portray the coastlines and Great Lakes. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters).The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto RicoCensus tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -4444...) have been set to null, with the exception of -5555... which has been set to zero. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

A map showing the location of the midpoints of the eastern Asian and eastern North American floras used in this study.

This multi-scale map shows the predominant (most numerous) race/ethnicity living within an area. Map opens at the state level, centered on the lower 48 states. Data is from U.S. Census Bureau's 2020 PL 94-171 data for state, county, tract, block group, and block.The map's colors indicate which of the eight race/ethnicity categories have the highest total count.Race and ethnicity highlights from the U.S. Census Bureau:White population remained the largest race or ethnicity group in the United States, with 204.3 million people identifying as White alone. Overall, 235.4 million people reported White alone or in combination with another group. However, the White alone population decreased by 8.6% since 2010.Two or More Races population (also referred to as the Multiracial population) has changed considerably since 2010. The Multiracial population was measured at 9 million people in 2010 and is now 33.8 million people in 2020, a 276% increase.“In combination” multiracial populations for all race groups accounted for most of the overall changes in each racial category.All of the race alone or in combination groups experienced increases. The Some Other Race alone or in combination group (49.9 million) increased 129%, surpassing the Black or African American population (46.9 million) as the second-largest race alone or in combination group.The next largest racial populations were the Asian alone or in combination group (24 million), the American Indian and Alaska Native alone or in combination group (9.7 million), and the Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone or in combination group (1.6 million).Hispanic or Latino population, which includes people of any race, was 62.1 million in 2020. Hispanic or Latino population grew 23%, while the population that was not of Hispanic or Latino origin grew 4.3% since 2010.View more 2020 Census statistics highlights on race and ethnicity.

This layer contains a Vermont-only subset of census tract level 2020 Decennial Census redistricting data as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau for all states plus DC and Puerto Rico. The attributes come from the 2020 Public Law 94-171 (P.L. 94-171) tables.Data download date: August 12, 2021Census tables: P1, P2, P3, P4, H1, P5, HeaderDownloaded from: Census FTP siteProcessing Notes:Data was downloaded from the U.S. Census Bureau FTP site, imported into SAS format and joined to the 2020 TIGER boundaries. Boundaries are sourced from the 2020 TIGER/Line Geodatabases. Boundaries have been projected into Web Mercator and each attribute has been given a clear descriptive alias name. No alterations have been made to the vertices of the data.Each attribute maintains it's specified name from Census, but also has a descriptive alias name and long description derived from the technical documentation provided by the Census. For a detailed list of the attributes contained in this layer, view the Data tab and select "Fields". The following alterations have been made to the tabular data:Joined all tables to create one wide attribute table:P1 - RaceP2 - Hispanic or Latino, and not Hispanic or Latino by RaceP3 - Race for the Population 18 Years and OverP4 - Hispanic or Latino, and not Hispanic or Latino by Race for the Population 18 Years and OverH1 - Occupancy Status (Housing)P5 - Group Quarters Population by Group Quarters Type (correctional institutions, juvenile facilities, nursing facilities/skilled nursing, college/university student housing, military quarters, etc.)HeaderAfter joining, dropped fields: FILEID, STUSAB, CHARITER, CIFSN, LOGRECNO, GEOVAR, GEOCOMP, LSADC, BLOCK, BLKGRP, and TBLKGRP.GEOCOMP was renamed to GEOID and moved be the first column in the table, the original GEOID was dropped.Placeholder fields for future legislative districts have been dropped: CD118, CD119, CD120, CD121, SLDU22, SLDU24, SLDU26, SLDU28, SLDL22, SLDL24 SLDL26, SLDL28.P0020001 was dropped, as it is duplicative of P0010001. Similarly, P0040001 was dropped, as it is duplicative of P0030001.In addition to calculated fields, County_Name and State_Name were added.The following calculated fields have been added (see long field descriptions in the Data tab for formulas used): PCT_P0030001: Percent of Population 18 Years and OverPCT_P0020002: Percent Hispanic or LatinoPCT_P0020005: Percent White alone, not Hispanic or LatinoPCT_P0020006: Percent Black or African American alone, not Hispanic or LatinoPCT_P0020007: Percent American Indian and Alaska Native alone, not Hispanic or LatinoPCT_P0020008: Percent Asian alone, Not Hispanic or LatinoPCT_P0020009: Percent Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone, not Hispanic or LatinoPCT_P0020010: Percent Some Other Race alone, not Hispanic or LatinoPCT_P0020011: Percent Population of Two or More Races, not Hispanic or LatinoPCT_H0010002: Percent of Housing Units that are OccupiedPCT_H0010003: Percent of Housing Units that are VacantPlease note these percentages might look strange at the individual tract level, since this data has been protected using differential privacy.*VCGI exported a Vermont-only subset of the nation-wide layer to produce this layer--with fields limited to this popular subset: OBJECTID: OBJECTID GEOID: Geographic Record Identifier NAME: Area Name-Legal/Statistical Area Description (LSAD) Term-Part Indicator County_Name: County Name State_Name: State Name P0010001: Total Population P0010003: Population of one race: White alone P0010004: Population of one race: Black or African American alone P0010005: Population of one race: American Indian and Alaska Native alone P0010006: Population of one race: Asian alone P0010007: Population of one race: Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone P0010008: Population of one race: Some Other Race alone P0020002: Hispanic or Latino Population P0020003: Non-Hispanic or Latino Population P0030001: Total population 18 years and over H0010001: Total housing units H0010002: Total occupied housing units H0010003: Total vacant housing units P0050001: Total group quarters population PCT_P0030001: Percent of Population 18 Years and Over PCT_P0020002: Percent Hispanic or Latino PCT_P0020005: Percent White alone, not Hispanic or Latino PCT_P0020006: Percent Black or African American alone, not Hispanic or Latino PCT_P0020007: Percent American Indian and Alaska Native alone, not Hispanic or Latino PCT_P0020008: Percent Asian alone, not Hispanic or Latino PCT_P0020009: Percent Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone, not Hispanic or Latino PCT_P0020010: Percent Some Other Race alone, not Hispanic or Latino PCT_P0020011: Percent Population of two or more races, not Hispanic or Latino PCT_H0010002: Percent of Housing Units that are Occupied PCT_H0010003: Percent of Housing Units that are Vacant SUMLEV: Summary Level REGION: Region DIVISION: Division COUNTY: County (FIPS) COUNTYNS: County (NS) TRACT: Census Tract AREALAND: Area (Land) AREAWATR: Area (Water) INTPTLON: Internal Point (Longitude) INTPTLAT: Internal Point (Latitude) BASENAME: Area Base Name POP100: Total Population Count HU100: Total Housing Count *To protect the privacy and confidentiality of respondents, data has been protected using differential privacy techniques by the U.S. Census Bureau. This means that some individual tracts will have values that are inconsistent or improbable. However, when aggregated up, these issues become minimized. Download Census redistricting data in this layer as a file geodatabase.Additional links:U.S. Census BureauU.S. Census Bureau Decennial CensusAbout the 2020 Census2020 Census2020 Census data qualityDecennial Census P.L. 94-171 Redistricting Data Program

In this excel file we provide the coding (extracted data) for all articles/studies included in the map.Tab 1: Description of the coding form (i.e., layout of form with column headers and descriptions)Tab 2: Coding - provides the full coding for all articles/studies included in the mapTab 3: Codes sheet - provides a list of codes used and definitions Tab 4: Dropdown lists used to populate fields of the coding form

Trip Data Licensing for Map Providers Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the Global Trip Data Licensing for Map Providers market size was valued at $1.82 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach $6.35 billion by 2033, expanding at a CAGR of 14.7% during the forecast period of 2025–2033. One of the major factors driving the robust growth of this market is the accelerating adoption of connected vehicles and smart mobility solutions, which demand precise, real-time, and historical trip data to power navigation, urban planning, and advanced mobility services. As cities and enterprises increasingly rely on data-driven insights to optimize transportation networks, the demand for high-quality trip data licensing is surging globally, underpinning the rapid expansion of this market.

Regional Outlook

North America currently commands the largest share of the global Trip Data Licensing for Map Providers market, accounting for approximately 38% of total revenue in 2024. This regional dominance is attributed to the mature ecosystem of automotive OEMs, advanced telematics infrastructure, and the early adoption of mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) platforms. The United States, in particular, benefits from robust regulatory frameworks supporting data sharing, a high concentration of technology providers, and a thriving ecosystem of ride-hailing and delivery platforms. Major metropolitan areas such as New York, Los Angeles, and Toronto are leveraging licensed trip data to enhance navigation, traffic management, and urban planning initiatives. Furthermore, North American map providers have established strong partnerships with automotive and logistics companies, further cementing the region’s leadership in trip data licensing.

Asia Pacific emerges as the fastest-growing region in the Trip Data Licensing for Map Providers market, projected to register a remarkable CAGR of 18.9% from 2025 to 2033. This accelerated growth is driven by rapid urbanization, the proliferation of smart city projects, and a surge in connected vehicle adoption across China, India, Japan, and Southeast Asia. Regional governments are investing heavily in digital infrastructure, intelligent transportation systems, and open data initiatives to address mounting traffic congestion and support sustainable urban mobility. The rise of homegrown mobility service providers and the expansion of global map providers into Asian markets are further fueling demand for both real-time and historical trip data. Strategic collaborations between public and private sectors are creating new avenues for data monetization and innovation, positioning Asia Pacific as a key growth engine for the industry.

Emerging economies in Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa are witnessing a gradual but steady uptake of trip data licensing solutions, albeit with unique adoption challenges. These regions face hurdles such as fragmented transportation networks, limited digital infrastructure, and regulatory ambiguities surrounding data privacy and sharing. Nevertheless, localized demand is growing as governments and urban planners recognize the value of trip data in alleviating congestion, improving public transit, and supporting economic development. Pilot projects in cities like São Paulo, Dubai, and Johannesburg are demonstrating the transformative potential of trip data for navigation and urban mobility, though scalability remains contingent on policy reforms, investment in digital infrastructure, and the development of region-specific licensing models.

Report Scope

As of October 2025, Indonesia was the country with the largest TikTok advertising reach, with ****** million users engaging with the popular social video platform. The United States followed, with ****** million TikTok users. Brazil came in third, with ****** million users on TikTok watching short videos. From Reels to Shorts: Social short video takes the internet Between 2021 and 2022, some of the most popular social media platforms have been adding short-video features on the heels of TikTok’s popularity. YouTube Shorts, which rolled out to the global market in June 2021, reached *** billion monthly active logged-in users in 2023. In comparison, Instagram’s short-video format Reels, which launched in August 2020, presented a higher view rate than regular videos on the platform between June 2021 and June 2022, as well as a higher likes rate than other content types on Instagram. TikTok business model TikTok is owned by the Beijing-based ByteDance, along with the short-video app Douyin (TikTok’s version for the Chinese market), video platform Xigua, and popular news app Toutiao. While the products intended for domestic market consumption operate in the Chinese digital ecosystem and have a plurality of established monetization methods, such as live-shopping events hosted by famous influencers, TikTok’s main revenue stream comes from online advertising. In 2025, ByteDance was estimated to have generated around **** billion U.S. dollars worldwide via online advertising.

Original census file name: tl_2020_