12 datasets found
  1. f

    Control parameter settings for comparative feature selection methods.

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 13, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash (2023). Control parameter settings for comparative feature selection methods. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275727.t008
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 13, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Control parameter settings for comparative feature selection methods.

  2. d

    Data from: Digital Antiquity and the Digital Archaeological Record (tDAR):...

    • dataone.org
    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Jan 31, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    McManamon, Francis (Center for Digital Antiquity); Kintigh, Keith (Arizona State University (ASU)); brin, adam (Center for Digital Antiquity) (2019). Digital Antiquity and the Digital Archaeological Record (tDAR): Broadening Access and Ensuring Long-Term Preservation for Digital Archaeological Data [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6067/XCV8KS6QT2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 31, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    the Digital Archaeological Record
    Authors
    McManamon, Francis (Center for Digital Antiquity); Kintigh, Keith (Arizona State University (ASU)); brin, adam (Center for Digital Antiquity)
    Description

    Digital Antiquity was established in 2009 as an organization with two primary goals. One goal is to expand dramatically access to digital files related to a wide range of archaeological investigations and topics, e.g., archives and collections; field studies of various scales and intensities; and historical, methodological, synthetic, or theoretical studies (Digital Antiquity 2010). In order to accomplish this goal, Digital Antiquity maintains a repository for digital archaeological data.

    The repository, known as the Digital Archaeological Record (tDAR) is accessible broadly. Through a web interface users worldwide are able to discover data and documents relevant to their interests. Individuals and organizations may contribute archaeological digital data to the repository by uploading their own data and documents and creating appropriate metadata for the digital objects they contribute. Users who register and agree to adhere to a set of conditions regarding appropriate use of data and recognition of the data depositors may download documents and data sets. The wider access provided to a richer array of documents and databases permits scholars to develop interpretations and communicate knowledge of the historic and long-term human past more effectively. This broader access also enhances the management and preservation of archaeological resources.

    Browsing or searching the tDAR repository enables users to identify digital documents, data sets, images, and other kinds of archaeological data for research, learning, teaching, and simply to satisfy their own curiosity about the past as revealed by archaeological research and interpretations. The tDAR repository permits registered users to download data files, while maintaining the confidentiality of legally protected information and the privacy of digital resources on which contributing researchers still are working. The tDAR repository provides researchers with new avenues to discover and integrate information relevant to topics they are studying. Currently users can search tDAR for digital documents, spreadsheets, and data sets. In the near future, images also will be available and, ultimately, other digital file types, for example GIS, GPS, CAD, 3D images and other data resources from archaeological projects spanning the globe. For data sets, users also can use data integration tools in tDAR to simplify and illuminate comparative research.

    The second major goal of Digital Antiquity is the long-term preservation of the data contributed to tDAR. Digital Antiquity is dedicated to ensuring the long-term preservation of digital archaeological data through procedures that check file integrity and correct any deterioration over time. Our procedures also provide for migration of data file formats from current standard types to new file standards as software and hardware computer technology develops. We aspire to meet the criteria for trusted digital repositories (OCLC and CRL 2007), which are required in order to ensure the long-term preservation and continued access to archived data. In the case of archaeological data, which document the archaeological record, the digital files encapsulate the combined efforts of the archaeological and scientific community, the public and private funds used to carry out research, as well as descriptions and analyses of the material from the ancient and historical cultures studied.

    As part of our commitment to long-term preservation, our strategy for the tDAR repository includes growth and improvement. We conduct regular maintenance and develop enhancements of different aspects of our procedures, repository functions, and user interface. These improvements are being planned in cooperation with an advisory team including archaeologists, supporting agencies, preservation experts, and staff to incorporate advances in research methods, digital preservation, and technology.

  3. f

    V-shaped transfer functions.

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 13, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash (2023). V-shaped transfer functions. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275727.t007
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 13, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    V-shaped transfer functions.

  4. f

    Standard deviation of fitness value results for tested algorithms.

    • plos.figshare.com
    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 13, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash (2023). Standard deviation of fitness value results for tested algorithms. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275727.t011
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 13, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Standard deviation of fitness value results for tested algorithms.

  5. a

    GNIS - Arizona (2021)

    • geodata-asu.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jan 1, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Arizona State University (2017). GNIS - Arizona (2021) [Dataset]. https://geodata-asu.hub.arcgis.com/maps/gnis-arizona-2021
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 1, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Arizona State University
    Area covered
    Description

    The Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) is the Federal standard for geographic nomenclature. The U.S. Geological Survey developed the GNIS for the U.S. Board on Geographic Names, a Federal inter-agency body chartered by public law to maintain uniform feature name usage throughout the Government and to promulgate standard names to the public. The GNIS is the official repository of domestic geographic names data; the official vehicle for geographic names use by all departments of the Federal Government; and the source for applying geographic names to Federal electronic and printed products of all types. See http://geonames.usgs.gov for additional information. Text data downloaded September 2021 and converted to a shapefile.

  6. f

    Feature selection ratio results for tested algorithms.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 13, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash (2023). Feature selection ratio results for tested algorithms. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275727.t012
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 13, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Feature selection ratio results for tested algorithms.

  7. f

    Resilts of Friedman and Iman-Davenport tests (α = 0.05).

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 13, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash (2023). Resilts of Friedman and Iman-Davenport tests (α = 0.05). [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275727.t005
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 13, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Resilts of Friedman and Iman-Davenport tests (α = 0.05).

  8. f

    The result of the best fitness value, mean fitness value, standard deviation...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 13, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash (2023). The result of the best fitness value, mean fitness value, standard deviation of fitness value and feature selection ratio of algorithms on the COVID-19 dataset. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275727.t015
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 13, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The result of the best fitness value, mean fitness value, standard deviation of fitness value and feature selection ratio of algorithms on the COVID-19 dataset.

  9. COVID-19 dataset description.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 13, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash (2023). COVID-19 dataset description. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275727.t014
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 13, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    COVID-19 dataset description.

  10. f

    Friedman ranks of tested methods on CEC2019 benchmark functions.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 13, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash (2023). Friedman ranks of tested methods on CEC2019 benchmark functions. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275727.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 13, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Friedman ranks of tested methods on CEC2019 benchmark functions.

  11. f

    Mean fitness and standard deviation results of compared approaches on...

    • plos.figshare.com
    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 13, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash (2023). Mean fitness and standard deviation results of compared approaches on CEC2019 benchmark functions. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275727.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 13, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Mean fitness and standard deviation results of compared approaches on CEC2019 benchmark functions.

  12. CEC 2019 benchmark characteristics.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 13, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash (2023). CEC 2019 benchmark characteristics. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275727.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 13, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    CEC 2019 benchmark characteristics.

  13. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash (2023). Control parameter settings for comparative feature selection methods. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275727.t008

Control parameter settings for comparative feature selection methods.

Related Article
Explore at:
xlsAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jun 13, 2023
Dataset provided by
PLOS ONE
Authors
Nebojsa Bacanin; Nebojsa Budimirovic; Venkatachalam K.; Ivana Strumberger; Adel Fahad Alrasheedi; Mohamed Abouhawwash
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

Control parameter settings for comparative feature selection methods.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu