As of 2025, the average age of senators in the 119th Congress was **. Of the total 100, ** members of the U.S. Senate were between the ages of ** and ** - more than any other age group. The minimum age requirement to be a member of the Senate is **, opposed to the House of Representatives which has a minimum age requirement of **. The average age of members of Congress from 2009 to 2023 can be found here.
While the average age of members of Congress in the United States has gradually risen in recent years, this number decreased slightly with the beginning of the 119th Congress in 2025. This Congress first convened on January 3rd, 2025, and will end on January 3, 2027. In this Congress, the average age in the House of Representatives was ** years, and the average age in the Senate was ** years.
As of 2024, the average age of staffers in U.S. Senate was 32. Over half of those working for the U.S. Senate were between the ages of 21 and 29 - more than any other age group. The average age of members of Congress from 2009 to 2023 can be found here.
In the 119th Congress which began in January 2025, almost ** percent of members of the House of Representatives were between the ages of ** and ** in 2025- more than any other age group.
This graph represents the average age of senators after each election in France in 2004, 2008, 2011, 2014 and 2017. We can thus observe that the Senate became younger in these last 13 years: going from an average age of 66 in 2011, to an average 60 years old after the 2017 elections.
The Italian Parliament consists of the Chamber of Deputies and the Senate of the Republic. In the Senate, there are 320 Senators, including 208 men and 112 women. The average age of all Senators in Italy is around 56 years and it is higher by two years for men than for women.
The 2006 Second Edition TIGER/Line files are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the Census TIGER database. The geographic coverage for a single TIGER/Line file is a county or statistical equivalent entity, with the coverage area based on the latest available governmental unit boundaries. The Census TIGER database represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts. However, each county-based TIGER/Line file is designed to stand alone as an independent data set or the files can be combined to cover the whole Nation. The 2006 Second Edition TIGER/Line files consist of line segments representing physical features and governmental and statistical boundaries. This shapefile represents the current State Senate Districts for New Mexico as posted on the Census Bureau website for 2006.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group of the Atlanta Regional Commission, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2013-2017, to show population by sex and age by Georgia Senate in the Atlanta region.
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2013-2017). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Naming conventions:
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
Suffixes:
None
Change over two periods
_e
Estimate from most recent ACS
_m
Margin of Error from most recent ACS
_00
Decennial 2000
Attributes:
Attributes and definitions available below under "Attributes" section and in Infrastructure Manifest (due to text box constraints, attributes cannot be displayed here). Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission
Date: 2013-2017
For additional information, please visit the Census ACS website.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset was developed by the Research & Analytics Group at the Atlanta Regional Commission using data from the U.S. Census Bureau.For a deep dive into the data model including every specific metric, see the Infrastructure Manifest. The manifest details ARC-defined naming conventions, field names/descriptions and topics, summary levels; source tables; notes and so forth for all metrics.Naming conventions:Prefixes: None Countp Percentr Ratem Mediana Mean (average)t Aggregate (total)ch Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)pch Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)chp Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)s Significance flag for change: 1 = statistically significant with a 90% CI, 0 = not statistically significant, blank = cannot be computed Suffixes: _e19 Estimate from 2014-19 ACS_m19 Margin of Error from 2014-19 ACS_00_v19 Decennial 2000, re-estimated to 2019 geography_00_19 Change, 2000-19_e10_v19 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2019 geography_m10_v19 Margin of Error from 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2019 geography_e10_19 Change, 2010-19The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent. The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2015-2019). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available. For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional CommissionDate: 2015-2019Data License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC by 4.0)Link to the manifest: https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/3d489c725bb24f52a987b302147c46ee/data
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset was developed by the Research & Analytics Group at the Atlanta Regional Commission using data from the U.S. Census Bureau.For a deep dive into the data model including every specific metric, see the Infrastructure Manifest. The manifest details ARC-defined naming conventions, field names/descriptions and topics, summary levels; source tables; notes and so forth for all metrics.Naming conventions:Prefixes: None Countp Percentr Ratem Mediana Mean (average)t Aggregate (total)ch Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)pch Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)chp Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)s Significance flag for change: 1 = statistically significant with a 90% CI, 0 = not statistically significant, blank = cannot be computed Suffixes: _e19 Estimate from 2014-19 ACS_m19 Margin of Error from 2014-19 ACS_00_v19 Decennial 2000, re-estimated to 2019 geography_00_19 Change, 2000-19_e10_v19 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2019 geography_m10_v19 Margin of Error from 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2019 geography_e10_19 Change, 2010-19The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent. The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2015-2019). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available. For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional CommissionDate: 2015-2019Data License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC by 4.0)Link to the manifest: https://www.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/3d489c725bb24f52a987b302147c46ee/data
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Division of the Atlanta Regional Commission using data from the U.S. Census Bureau.
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2014-2018). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For a deep dive into the data model including every specific metric, see the Infrastructure Manifest. The manifest details ARC-defined naming conventions, field names/descriptions and topics, summary levels; source tables; notes and so forth for all metrics.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Naming conventions:
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
s
Significance flag for change: 1 = statistically significant with a 90% Confidence Interval, 0 = not statistically significant, blank = cannot be computed
Suffixes:
_e18
Estimate from 2014-18 ACS
_m18
Margin of Error from 2014-18 ACS
_00_v18
Decennial 2000 in 2018 geography boundary
_00_18
Change, 2000-18
_e10_v18
Estimate from 2006-10 ACS in 2018 geography boundary
_m10_v18
Margin of Error from 2006-10 ACS in 2018 geography boundary
_e10_18
Change, 2010-18
This graph shows the median wealth of US lawmakers in Congress from 2008 to 2018, for both chambers. In 2018, the median wealth in the Senate amounted to 1.76 million U.S. dollars.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Content
A dataset of counties that are representative for Germany with regard to
the average disposable income,
the quota of divorces,
the respective quotas of employees working in the services (excluding logistics, security, and cleaning) and the MINT sectors,
the proportions of age groups in the total proportion of the respective population, with age groups in five-year strata for the population aged between 30 and 65 and the population in the age range between 65 and 75 each considered separately for the calculation of representativeness.
In addition, data from the four big cities Berlin, München (Munich), Hamburg, and Köln (Cologne) were collected and reflected in the dataset.
The dataset is based on the most recent data available at the time of the creation of the dataset, mainly deriving from 2022, as set out in detail in the readme.md file.
Method applied
The selection of the representative counties, as reflected in the dataset, was performed on the basis of official statistics with the aim of obtaining a confidence rate of 95%. The selection was based on a principal component analysis of the statistical data available for Germany and the addition of the regions with the lowest population density and the highest and lowest per capita disposable income. A check of the representativity of the selected counties was performed.
In the case of Leipzig, the city and the district had to be treated together, in deviation from the official territorial division, with respect to a specific use case of the data.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group of the Atlanta Regional Commission, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2013-2017, to show the number of grandparents living with grandchildren and the number and percentage of grandparents responsible for grandchildren by Georgia Senate in the Atlanta region.
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2013-2017). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Naming conventions:
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
Suffixes:
None
Change over two periods
_e
Estimate from most recent ACS
_m
Margin of Error from most recent ACS
_00
Decennial 2000
Attributes:
SumLevel
Summary level of geographic unit (e.g., County, Tract, NSA, NPU, DSNI, SuperDistrict, etc)
GEOID
Census tract Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) code
NAME
Name of geographic unit
Planning_Region
Planning region designation for ARC purposes
Acres
Total area within the tract (in acres)
SqMi
Total area within the tract (in square miles)
County
County identifier (combination of Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) codes for state and county)
CountyName
County Name
GrandWChild_e
# Grandparents living with grandchildren under age 18, 2017
GrandWChild_m
# Grandparents living with grandchildren under age 18, 2017 (MOE)
GrandRespChild_e
# Grandparents responsible for grandchildren under age 18, 2017
GrandRespChild_m
# Grandparents responsible for grandchildren under age 18, 2017 (MOE)
pGrandRespChild_e
% Grandparents responsible for grandchildren under age 18, 2017
pGrandRespChild_m
% Grandparents responsible for grandchildren under age 18, 2017 (MOE)
PopU18_e
# Population under age 18, 2017
PopU18_m
# Population under age 18, 2017 (MOE)
ChildrenByGrandHH_e
# Children raised by grandparent, 2017
ChildrenByGrandHH_m
# Children raised by grandparent, 2017 (MOE)
pChildrenByGrandHH_e
% Children raised by grandparent, 2017
pChildrenByGrandHH_m
% Children raised by grandparent, 2017 (MOE)
last_edited_date
Last date the feature was edited by ARC
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission
Date: 2013-2017
For additional information, please visit the Census ACS website.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group of the Atlanta Regional Commission, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2013-2017, to show age, type, vacancy rates, and owner/renter tenure of housing units by Georgia Senate in the Atlanta region.
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2013-2017). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Naming conventions:
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
Suffixes:
None
Change over two periods
_e
Estimate from most recent ACS
_m
Margin of Error from most recent ACS
_00
Decennial 2000
Attributes:
Attributes and definitions available below under "Attributes" section and in Infrastructure Manifest (due to text box constraints, attributes cannot be displayed here).
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission
Date: 2013-2017
For additional information, please visit the Census ACS website.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group of the Atlanta Regional Commission, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2013-2017, to show the number and percentages of migration by Georgia Senate in the Atlanta region.
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2013-2017). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Naming conventions:
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
Suffixes:
None
Change over two periods
_e
Estimate from most recent ACS
_m
Margin of Error from most recent ACS
_00
Decennial 2000
Attributes:
SumLevel
Summary level of geographic unit (e.g., County, Tract, NSA, NPU, DSNI, SuperDistrict, etc)
GEOID
Census tract Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) code
NAME
Name of geographic unit
Planning_Region
Planning region designation for ARC purposes
Acres
Total area within the tract (in acres)
SqMi
Total area within the tract (in square miles)
County
County identifier (combination of Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) codes for state and county)
CountyName
County Name
Pop1P_e
# Population ages 1 year and over, 2017
Pop1P_m
# Population ages 1 year and over, 2017 (MOE)
SameHouse_e
# Living in the same house as 1 year ago, 2017
SameHouse_m
# Living in the same house as 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
pSameHouse_e
% Living in the same house as 1 year ago, 2017
pSameHouse_m
% Living in the same house as 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
DiffHouseInUS_e
# Living in a different house in the U.S. 1 year ago, 2017
DiffHouseInUS_m
# Living in a different house in the U.S. 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
pDiffHouseInUS_e
% Living in a different house in the U.S. 1 year ago, 2017
pDiffHouseInUS_m
% Living in a different house in the U.S. 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
SameCounty_e
# Living in a different house in the same county 1 year ago, 2017
SameCounty_m
# Living in a different house in the same county 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
pSameCounty_e
% Living in a different house in the same county 1 year ago, 2017
pSameCounty_m
% Living in a different house in the same county 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
DiffCounty_e
# Living in a different county 1 year ago, 2017
DiffCounty_m
# Living in a different county 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
pDiffCounty_e
% Living in a different county 1 year ago, 2017
pDiffCounty_m
% Living in a different county 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
SameState_e
# Living in a different county, same state 1 year ago, 2017
SameState_m
# Living in a different county, same state 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
pSameState_e
% Living in a different county, same state 1 year ago, 2017
pSameState_m
% Living in a different county, same state 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
Diff_State_e
# Living in a different state 1 year ago, 2017
Diff_State_m
# Living in a different state 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
pDiff_State_e
% Living in a different state 1 year ago, 2017
pDiff_State_m
% Living in a different state 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
Abroad_e
# Living abroad 1 year ago, 2017
Abroad_m
# Living abroad 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
pAbroad_e
% Living abroad 1 year ago, 2017
pAbroad_m
% Living abroad 1 year ago, 2017 (MOE)
Moved_e
# Moved in the last year, 2017
Moved_m
# Moved in the last year, 2017 (MOE)
pMoved_e
% Moved in the last year, 2017
pMoved_m
% Moved in the last year, 2017 (MOE)
last_edited_date
Last date the feature was edited by ARC
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission
Date: 2013-2017
For additional information, please visit the Census ACS website.
https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/2965/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/2965/terms
This poll, fielded January 10, 2000, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other political and social issues. Respondents were asked to give their opinions of President Bill Clinton and his handling of the presidency, foreign policy, and the economy, as well as their views on the upcoming November 7, 2000, presidential election and the current presidential primary/caucus season. Respondents were asked how much attention they had paid to the 2000 presidential race and whether they intended to vote. Given a choice between Vice President Al Gore, former New Jersey senator Bill Bradley, Texas governor George W. Bush, and Arizona senator John McCain, those queried were asked for whom they would vote. Their views were sought on the most important issues of this presidential election and which candidate was best suited to handle issues such as education, the economy, taxes, Social Security/Medicare, campaign finance reform, international affairs, and health care. Respondents were asked if the following statements applied to Bradley, Bush, Gore, or McCain: typical politician, understands the average American, strong leader, experienced enough to be president, would bring needed change to Washington, DC, knowledgeable of world affairs, loyal to his political party, inspiring, and has a chance of winning the election. Respondents were asked for whom they would vote in a Democratic primary or caucus, given a choice between Gore and Bradley, and for whom they would vote in a Republican primary or caucus, given a choice among Bush, conservative commentator Pat Buchanan, publisher Steve Forbes, McCain, radio talk show host Alan Keyes, Family Research Council president Gary Bauer, and Utah senator Orrin Hatch. Additional topics covered whether respondents were pleased with the choice of candidates for the 2000 election, whether they would support a plan whereby candidates agreed to participate in twice-weekly debates and agreed not to run televised political advertisements, and whether they believed homosexuals should be allowed to serve in the military. Background information on respondents includes age, sex, education, political party, political orientation, Hispanic descent, voter registration and participation history, military service, labor union membership, and family income.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group of the Atlanta Regional Commission, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2013-2017, to show counts and percentages for school enrollment by education level by Georgia Senate in the Atlanta region.
The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.
The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2013-2017). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.
For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.
Naming conventions:
Prefixes:
None
Count
p
Percent
r
Rate
m
Median
a
Mean (average)
t
Aggregate (total)
ch
Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)
pch
Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)
chp
Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)
Suffixes:
None
Change over two periods
_e
Estimate from most recent ACS
_m
Margin of Error from most recent ACS
_00
Decennial 2000
Attributes:
SumLevel
Summary level of geographic unit (e.g., County, Tract, NSA, NPU, DSNI, SuperDistrict, etc)
GEOID
Census tract Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) code
NAME
Name of geographic unit
Planning_Region
Planning region designation for ARC purposes
Acres
Total area within the tract (in acres)
SqMi
Total area within the tract (in square miles)
County
County identifier (combination of Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) codes for state and county)
CountyName
County Name
Pop3P_e
# Population ages 3 and over, 2017
Pop3P_m
# Population ages 3 and over, 2017 (MOE)
InSchool_e
# Population 3 years and over enrolled in school, 2017
InSchool_m
# Population 3 years and over enrolled in school, 2017 (MOE)
InPreSchool_e
# Enrolled in nursery school, preschool, 2017
InPreSchool_m
# Enrolled in nursery school, preschool, 2017 (MOE)
pInPreSchool_e
% Enrolled in nursery school, preschool, 2017
pInPreSchool_m
% Enrolled in nursery school, preschool, 2017 (MOE)
InKindergarten_e
# Enrolled in kindergarten, 2017
InKindergarten_m
# Enrolled in kindergarten, 2017 (MOE)
pInKindergarten_e
% Enrolled in kindergarten, 2017
pInKindergarten_m
% Enrolled in kindergarten, 2017 (MOE)
InElementary_e
# Enrolled in elementary school (grades 1-8), 2017
InElementary_m
# Enrolled in elementary school (grades 1-8), 2017 (MOE)
pInElementary_e
% Enrolled in elementary school (grades 1-8), 2017
pInElementary_m
% Enrolled in elementary school (grades 1-8), 2017 (MOE)
InHS_e
# Enrolled in high school (grades 9-12), 2017
InHS_m
# Enrolled in high school (grades 9-12), 2017 (MOE)
pInHS_e
% Enrolled in high school (grades 9-12), 2017
pInHS_m
% Enrolled in high school (grades 9-12), 2017 (MOE)
InCollegeGradSch_e
# Enrolled in college or graduate school, 2017
InCollegeGradSch_m
# Enrolled in college or graduate school, 2017 (MOE)
last_edited_date
Last date the feature was edited by ARC
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission
Date: 2013-2017
For additional information, please visit the Census ACS website.
The 119th Congress began in January 2025. In this Congress, there were 26 women serving as Senators, and 74 men. The number of women has increased since the 1975 when there were no women in the Senate. The first female Senator was Rebecca Felton of Georgia who was sworn in 1922. A breakdown of women Senators by party can be found here.
The annual salary received by members of the United States Congress in 2025 is ******* U.S. dollars. This has been the case since 2009. The Government Ethics Reform Act of 1989 provides an automatic cost of living adjustment increase in line with the
As of 2025, the average age of senators in the 119th Congress was **. Of the total 100, ** members of the U.S. Senate were between the ages of ** and ** - more than any other age group. The minimum age requirement to be a member of the Senate is **, opposed to the House of Representatives which has a minimum age requirement of **. The average age of members of Congress from 2009 to 2023 can be found here.