51 datasets found
  1. Average adult male body weight in the U.S. from 1999 to 2016, by ethnicity

    • statista.com
    Updated Jan 14, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2019). Average adult male body weight in the U.S. from 1999 to 2016, by ethnicity [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/955064/adult-male-body-weight-average-us-by-ethnicity/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 14, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    1999 - 2016
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This statistic depicts the average body weight of U.S. men aged 20 years and over from 1999 to 2016, by ethnicity. According to the data, the average male body weight for those that identified as non-Hispanic white has increased from 192.3 in 1999-2000 to 202.2 in 2015-2016.

  2. F

    Employed full time: Median usual weekly real earnings: Wage and salary...

    • fred.stlouisfed.org
    json
    Updated Apr 16, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Employed full time: Median usual weekly real earnings: Wage and salary workers: 16 years and over: Black or African American: Men [Dataset]. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LEU0252884900Q
    Explore at:
    jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 16, 2025
    License

    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain

    Description

    Graph and download economic data for Employed full time: Median usual weekly real earnings: Wage and salary workers: 16 years and over: Black or African American: Men (LEU0252884900Q) from Q1 2000 to Q1 2025 about full-time, males, African-American, salaries, workers, earnings, 16 years +, wages, median, real, employment, and USA.

  3. U.S. household income of black families 1990-2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Sep 17, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). U.S. household income of black families 1990-2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/203295/median-income-of-black-households-in-the-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 17, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The median income in 2023 was at 56,490 U.S. dollars for Black households. In 1990, the median income among Black households was 38,360 U.S. dollars (In 2023 U.S. dollars).

  4. Leading causes of death among Black U.S. residents from 2020 to 2022

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated Dec 13, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Leading causes of death among Black U.S. residents from 2020 to 2022 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/233310/distribution-of-the-10-leading-causes-of-death-among-african-americans/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 13, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The leading causes of death among Black residents in the United States in 2022 included diseases of the heart, cancer, unintentional injuries, and stroke. The leading causes of death for African Americans generally reflects the leading causes of death for the entire United States population. However, a major exception is that death from assault or homicide is the seventh leading cause of death among African Americans, but is not among the ten leading causes for the general population. Homicide among African Americans The homicide rate among African Americans has been higher than that of other races and ethnicities for many years. In 2023, around 9,284 Black people were murdered in the United States, compared to 7,289 white people. A majority of these homicides are committed with firearms, which are easily accessible in the United States. In 2022, around 14,189 Black people died by firearms. However, suicide deaths account for over half of all deaths from firearms in the United States. Cancer disparities There are also major disparities in access to health care and the impact of various diseases. For example, the incidence rate of cancer among African American males is the greatest among all ethnicities and races. Furthermore, although the incidence rate of cancer is lower among African American women than it is among white women, cancer death rates are still higher among African American women.

  5. U.S. distribution of race and ethnicity among the military 2019

    • statista.com
    Updated Jan 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). U.S. distribution of race and ethnicity among the military 2019 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/214869/share-of-active-duty-enlisted-women-and-men-in-the-us-military/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 24, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In the fiscal year of 2019, 21.39 percent of active-duty enlisted women were of Hispanic origin. The total number of active duty military personnel in 2019 amounted to 1.3 million people.

    Ethnicities in the United States The United States is known around the world for the diversity of its population. The Census recognizes six different racial and ethnic categories: White American, Native American and Alaska Native, Asian American, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander. People of Hispanic or Latino origin are classified as a racially diverse ethnicity.

    The largest part of the population, about 61.3 percent, is composed of White Americans. The largest minority in the country are Hispanics with a share of 17.8 percent of the population, followed by Black or African Americans with 13.3 percent. Life in the U.S. and ethnicity However, life in the United States seems to be rather different depending on the race or ethnicity that you belong to. For instance: In 2019, native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders had the highest birth rate of 58 per 1,000 women, while the birth rae of white alone, non Hispanic women was 49 children per 1,000 women.

    The Black population living in the United States has the highest poverty rate with of all Census races and ethnicities in the United States. About 19.5 percent of the Black population was living with an income lower than the 2020 poverty threshold. The Asian population has the smallest poverty rate in the United States, with about 8.1 percent living in poverty.

    The median annual family income in the United States in 2020 earned by Black families was about 57,476 U.S. dollars, while the average family income earned by the Asian population was about 109,448 U.S. dollars. This is more than 25,000 U.S. dollars higher than the U.S. average family income, which was 84,008 U.S. dollars.

  6. Murder in the U.S.: number of victims in 2023, by race

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated Nov 7, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Murder in the U.S.: number of victims in 2023, by race [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/251877/murder-victims-in-the-us-by-race-ethnicity-and-gender/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 7, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In 2023, the FBI reported that there were 9,284 Black murder victims in the United States and 7,289 white murder victims. In comparison, there were 554 murder victims of unknown race and 586 victims of another race. Victims of inequality? In recent years, the role of racial inequality in violent crimes such as robberies, assaults, and homicides has gained public attention. In particular, the issue of police brutality has led to increasing attention following the murder of George Floyd, an African American who was killed by a Minneapolis police officer. Studies show that the rate of fatal police shootings for Black Americans was more than double the rate reported of other races. Crime reporting National crime data in the United States is based off the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s new crime reporting system, which requires law enforcement agencies to self-report their data in detail. Due to the recent implementation of this system, less crime data has been reported, with some states such as Delaware and Pennsylvania declining to report any data to the FBI at all in the last few years, suggesting that the Bureau's data may not fully reflect accurate information on crime in the United States.

  7. a

    U.S. Heart Disease Mortality 2020-2022

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Nov 29, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2024). U.S. Heart Disease Mortality 2020-2022 [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/870b8cfb42eb40fc9544d6c5bcca7f8e
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 29, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Area covered
    Description

    2020 - 2022, county-level U.S. heart disease death rates. Dataset developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention.Data SourceMortality data were obtained from the National Vital Statistics System. Bridged-Race Postcensal Population Estimates were obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes: I00-I09, I11, I13, I20-I51; underlying cause of death.Data DictionaryData for counties with small populations are not displayed when a reliable rate could not be generated. These counties are represented in the data with values of '-1.' CDC excludes these values when classifying the data on a map, indicating those counties as 'Insufficient Data.'Data field names and descriptionsstcty_fips: state FIPS code + county FIPS codeOther fields use the following format: RRR_S_aaaa (e.g., API_M_35UP)  RRR: 3 digits represent race/ethnicity    All - Overall    AIA - American Indian and Alaska Native, non-Hispanic    ASN - Asian, non-Hispanic    BLK - Black, non-Hispanic    HIS - Hispanic NHP – Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, non-Hispanic MOR – More than one race, non-Hispanic    WHT - White, non-Hispanic  S: 1 digit represents sex    A - All    F - Female    M - Male  aaaa: 4 digits represent age. The first 2 digits are the lower bound for age and the last 2 digits are the upper bound for age. 'UP' indicates the data includes the maximum age available and 'LT' indicates ages less than the upper bound. Example: The column 'BLK_M_65UP' displays rates per 100,000 black men aged 65 years and older.MethodologyRates are calculated using a 3-year average and are age-standardized in 10-year age groups using the 2000 U.S. Standard Population. Rates are calculated and displayed per 100,000 population. Rates were spatially smoothed using a Local Empirical Bayes algorithm to stabilize risk by borrowing information from neighboring geographic areas, making estimates more statistically robust and stable for counties with small populations. Data for counties with small populations are coded as '-1' when a reliable rate could not be generated. County-level rates were generated when the following criteria were met over a 3-year time period within each of the filters (e.g., age, race, and sex).At least one of the following 3 criteria:At least 20 events occurred within the county and its adjacent neighbors.ORAt least 16 events occurred within the county.ORAt least 5,000 population years within the county.AND all 3 of the following criteria:At least 6 population years for each age group used for age adjustment if that age group had 1 or more event.The number of population years in an age group was greater than the number of events.At least 100 population years within the county.More Questions?Interactive Atlas of Heart Disease and StrokeData SourcesStatistical Methods

  8. E

    Diversity in Tech Statistics 2024 – By Countries, Companies And Demographic...

    • enterpriseappstoday.com
    Updated Mar 1, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    EnterpriseAppsToday (2024). Diversity in Tech Statistics 2024 – By Countries, Companies And Demographic (Age, Gender, Race, Education) [Dataset]. https://www.enterpriseappstoday.com/stats/diversity-in-tech-statistics.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 1, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    EnterpriseAppsToday
    License

    https://www.enterpriseappstoday.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.enterpriseappstoday.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2022 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Diversity in Tech Statistics: In today's tech-driven world, discussions about diversity in the technology sector have gained significant traction. Recent statistics shed light on the disparities and opportunities within this industry. According to data from various sources, including reports from leading tech companies and diversity advocacy groups, the lack of diversity remains a prominent issue. For example, studies reveal that only 25% of computing jobs in the United States are held by women, while Black and Hispanic individuals make up just 9% of the tech workforce combined. Additionally, research indicates that LGBTQ+ individuals are underrepresented in tech, with only 2.3% of tech workers identifying as LGBTQ+. Despite these challenges, there are promising signs of progress. Companies are increasingly recognizing the importance of diversity and inclusion initiatives, with some allocating significant resources to address these issues. For instance, tech giants like Google and Microsoft have committed millions of USD to diversity programs aimed at recruiting and retaining underrepresented talent. As discussions surrounding diversity in tech continue to evolve, understanding the statistical landscape is crucial in fostering meaningful change and creating a more inclusive industry for all. Editor’s Choice In 2021, 7.9% of the US labor force was employed in technology. Women hold only 26.7% of tech employment, while men hold 73.3% of these positions. White Americans hold 62.5% of the positions in the US tech sector. Asian Americans account for 20% of jobs, Latinx Americans 8%, and Black Americans 7%. 83.3% of tech executives in the US are white. Black Americans comprised 14% of the population in 2019 but held only 7% of tech employment. For the same position, at the same business, and with the same experience, women in tech are typically paid 3% less than men. The high-tech sector employs more men (64% against 52%), Asian Americans (14% compared to 5.8%), and white people (68.5% versus 63.5%) compared to other industries. The tech industry is urged to prioritize inclusion when hiring, mentoring, and retaining employees to bridge the digital skills gap. Black professionals only account for 4% of all tech workers despite being 13% of the US workforce. Hispanic professionals hold just 8% of all STEM jobs despite being 17% of the national workforce. Only 22% of workers in tech are ethnic minorities. Gender diversity in tech is low, with just 26% of jobs in computer-related sectors occupied by women. Companies with diverse teams have higher profitability, with those in the top quartile for gender diversity being 25% more likely to have above-average profitability. Every month, the tech industry adds about 9,600 jobs to the U.S. economy. Between May 2009 and May 2015, over 800,000 net STEM jobs were added to the U.S. economy. STEM jobs are expected to grow by another 8.9% between 2015 and 2024. The percentage of black and Hispanic employees at major tech companies is very low, making up just one to three percent of the tech workforce. Tech hiring relies heavily on poaching and incentives, creating an unsustainable ecosystem ripe for disruption. Recruiters have a significant role in disrupting the hiring process to support diversity and inclusion. You May Also Like To Read Outsourcing Statistics Digital Transformation Statistics Internet of Things Statistics Computer Vision Statistics

  9. U.S. mean earnings by educational attainment and ethnicity/race 2023

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated Jun 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). U.S. mean earnings by educational attainment and ethnicity/race 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/184259/mean-earnings-by-educational-attainment-and-ethnic-group/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 24, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In 2023, the mean income of Black Bachelor's degree holders was ****** U.S. dollars, compared to ****** U.S. dollars for White Americans with a Bachelor's degree.

  10. f

    DataSheet1_Comparing Genetic and Socioenvironmental Contributions to Ethnic...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    pdf
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Shashwat Deepali Nagar; Andrew B. Conley; Shivam Sharma; Lavanya Rishishwar; I. King Jordan; Leonardo Mariño-Ramírez (2023). DataSheet1_Comparing Genetic and Socioenvironmental Contributions to Ethnic Differences in C-Reactive Protein.PDF [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.738485.s001
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Shashwat Deepali Nagar; Andrew B. Conley; Shivam Sharma; Lavanya Rishishwar; I. King Jordan; Leonardo Mariño-Ramírez
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    C-reactive protein (CRP) is a routinely measured blood biomarker for inflammation. Elevated levels of circulating CRP are associated with response to infection, risk for a number of complex common diseases, and psychosocial stress. The objective of this study was to compare the contributions of genetic ancestry, socioenvironmental factors, and inflammation-related health conditions to ethnic differences in C-reactive protein levels. We used multivariable regression to compare CRP blood serum levels between Black and White ethnic groups from the United Kingdom Biobank (UKBB) prospective cohort study. CRP serum levels are significantly associated with ethnicity in an age and sex adjusted model. Study participants who identify as Black have higher average CRP than those who identify as White, CRP increases with age, and females have higher average CRP than males. Ethnicity and sex show a significant interaction effect on CRP. Black females have higher average CRP levels than White females, whereas White males have higher average CRP than Black males. Significant associations between CRP, ethnicity, and genetic ancestry are almost completely attenuated in a fully adjusted model that includes socioenvironmental factors and inflammation-related health conditions. BMI, smoking, and socioeconomic deprivation all have high relative effects on CRP. These results indicate that socioenvironmental factors contribute more to CRP ethnic differences than genetics. Differences in CRP are associated with ethnic disparities for a number of chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes, essential hypertension, sarcoidosis, and lupus erythematosus. Our results indicate that ethnic differences in CRP are linked to both socioenvironmental factors and numerous ethnic health disparities.

  11. U.S. African American unemployment rate 1990-2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 5, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). U.S. African American unemployment rate 1990-2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/194151/unemployment-rate-of-african-americans-in-the-us-since-1990/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 5, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In 2023, the unemployment rate of African Americans in the United States stood at 5.5 percent. This was over the national average of 3.6 percent.

    The high rate of unemployment

    There are many reasons why the unemployment rate among minorities is different than the national average. When it comes to African Americans, a large part of this is due to historical events, such as slavery and the struggle for civil rights, as well as the number of Black families living below the poverty level. Additionally, in 2019, for every 100,000 of the population, there were 2,203 Black men in prison. This high rate of imprisonment can contribute to the unemployment rate for African Americans, since having been in prison can reduce one’s chances of finding a job once released.

    Earning differences

    African Americans also make less money than other ethnicities in the United States. In 2020, the median weekly earnings of African Americans were 794 U.S. dollars, compared to Asians, who made 1,310 U.S. dollars per week, and whites, who made 1,003 U.S. dollars per week. While the African American unemployment rate may be low, it is clear that much has to change in order to achieve full equality.

  12. Gender and Ethnicity Pay Gap Report as at 31 March 2023

    • gov.uk
    Updated Apr 23, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Regulator of Social Housing (2024). Gender and Ethnicity Pay Gap Report as at 31 March 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/gender-and-ethnicity-pay-gap-report-as-at-31-march-2024
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 23, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Regulator of Social Housing
    Description

    Contents

    Gender pay gap

    Ethnicity pay gap

    Foreword

    This report reflects our gender and ethnicity pay gap data as of March 2023, which we annually report in arrears.

    Although our staff count falls below the 250-employee threshold for mandatory gender pay gap reporting, we have voluntarily chosen to publish our findings for the fifth year, believing it aligns with best practices and promotes transparency in pay across the public sector.

    We continue to strive for an inclusive, welcoming, and fair environment for all members of our team. These plans encompass various aspects of our operations, from recruitment and promotions to training and mentorship, all aimed at eliminating barriers and promoting equal opportunities. The ultimate goal is to ensure that every member of our organisation is provided with a fair and equal path to success to support the regulator in driving change in the social housing sector to deliver more and better social housing.

    Gender Identity

    In accordance with the current requirements for reporting on the gender pay gap, our approach involves categorising gender into male and female within our data classification.

    It is important to note that we define gender in accordance with the classifications provided by His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC), which categorise individuals as male or female, in our data.

    In the context of this report, we have employed the terms ‘gender,’ ‘male,’ and ‘female,’ understanding that they typically relate to biological sex. However, it’s important to acknowledge that for some individuals, these terms may not fully encapsulate their gender identity.

    How the Gender Pay Gap is worked out

    In 2017, the government introduced a statutory requirement for organisations with 250 or more employees to report annually on their gender pay gap. Government departments are covered by the https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2017/353/contents/made" class="govuk-link">Equality Act 2010 (Specific Duties and Public Authorities) Regulations 2017 which came into force on 31 March 2017. These regulations underpin the Public Sector Equality Duty and require the relevant organisations to annually publish their gender pay gap data on:

    • Mean and median gender pay gap in hourly pay,
    • Mean and median bonus gender pay gap,
    • Proportion of men and women receiving a bonus payment; and
    • Proportion of men and women in each pay quartile.

    The gender pay gap shows the difference in the average pay between all men and women in a workforce. Mean and median gender pay gap figures are based on a comparison of men and women’s hourly pay across the organisation irrespective of grade, which means that the gap shows the difference in the average pay between all men and women in the organisation’s workforce.

    • The mean figure is the percentage difference between the mean average hourly rates of men and women’s pay.

    • The median figure is the percentage difference between the midpoints in the ranges of men and women’s pay.

    • The bonus gap refers to bonus payments paid to men and women employees during the 12 months period prior to the snapshot date.

    Our gender pay gap at 31 March 2023

    Our figures at 31 March 2023

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/662773a0838212a903a7e52c/gender_pay_gap_comparative_years.png" alt="">

    Data table

    <table

  13. s

    NHS basic pay

    • ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk
    csv
    Updated Aug 8, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Race Disparity Unit (2023). NHS basic pay [Dataset]. https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/workforce-and-business/public-sector-pay/nhs-basic-pay/latest
    Explore at:
    csv(43 KB)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 8, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Race Disparity Unit
    License

    Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    England
    Description

    For NHS staff in May 2020, Black men were paid 84p for every £1 paid to White men. Black women were paid 93p for every £1 paid to White women.

  14. Frequency of body lotion use among male U.S. consumers 2017, by ethnicity

    • statista.com
    Updated Apr 3, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Frequency of body lotion use among male U.S. consumers 2017, by ethnicity [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/721971/body-lotion-frequency-men-use-us-ethnicity/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 3, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jun 16, 2017 - Jun 26, 2017
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This statistic shows the results of a Statista survey in which male U.S. respondents were asked how often they use body lotion, sorted by ethnicity. During the June 2017 survey, 51 percent of African American respondents reported using body lotion every day.

  15. i

    Consumer Expenditure Diary Survey 2005 - United States

    • webapps.ilo.org
    Updated Jun 23, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    United State Census Bureau (2017). Consumer Expenditure Diary Survey 2005 - United States [Dataset]. https://webapps.ilo.org/surveyLib/index.php/catalog/343
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 23, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    United State Census Bureau
    Time period covered
    2005
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Abstract

    The Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE) program provides a continuous and comprehensive flow of data on the buying habits of American consumers. These data are used widely in economic research and analysis, and in support of revisions of the Consumer Price Index. To meet the needs of users, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) produces population estimates (for consumer units or CUs) of average expenditures in news releases, reports, and articles in the Monthly Labor Review. Tabulated CE data are also available on the Internet and by facsimile transmission (see Section XVI. Appendix 5). These microdata files present detailed expenditure and income data for the Diary component of the CE for 2005. They include weekly expenditure (EXPD), annual income (DTBD) files, and imputed income files (DTID). The data in EXPD, DTBD, and DTID files are categorized by a Universal Classification Code (UCC). The advantage of the EXPD and DTBD files is that with the data classified in a standardized format, the user may perform comparative expenditure (income) analysis with relative ease. The FMLD and MEMD files present data on the characteristics and demographics of CUs and CU members. The summary level expenditure and income information on the FMLD files permits the data user to link consumer spending, by general expenditure category, and household characteristics and demographics on one set of files. Estimates of average expenditures in 2005 from the Diary survey, integrated with data from the Interview survey, are published in Consumer Expenditures in 2005. A list of recent publications containing data from the CE appears at the end of this documentation. The microdata files are in the public domain and, with appropriate credit, may be reproduced without permission. A suggested citation is: “U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Expenditure Survey, Diary Survey, 2005”.

    State Identifier Since the CE is not designed to produce state-level estimates, summing the consumer unit weights by state will not yield state population totals. A CU's basic weight reflects its probability of selection among a group of primary sampling units of similar characteristics. For example, sample units in an urban nonmetropolitan area in California may represent similar areas in Wyoming and Nevada. Among other adjustments, CUs are post-stratified nationally by sex-age-race. For example, the weights of consumer units containing a black male, age 16-24 in Alabama, Colorado, or New York, are all adjusted equivalently. Therefore, weighted population state totals will not match population totals calculated from other surveys that are designed to represent state data. To summarize, the CE sample was not designed to produce precise estimates for individual states. Although state-level estimates that are unbiased in a repeated sampling sense can be calculated for various statistical measures, such as means and aggregates, their estimates will generally be subject to large variances. Additionally, a particular state-population estimate from the CE sample may be far from the true state-population estimate.

    Interpreting the data Several factors should be considered when interpreting the expenditure data. The average expenditure for an item may be considerably lower than the expenditure by those CUs that purchased the item. The less frequently an item is purchased, the greater the difference between the average for all consumer units and the average of those purchasing. (See Section V.B. for ESTIMATION OF TOTAL AND MEAN EXPENDITURES). Also, an individual CU may spend more or less than the average, depending on its particular characteristics. Factors such as income, age of family Members, geographic location, taste and personal preference also influence expenditures. Furthermore, even within groups with similar characteristics, the distribution of expenditures varies substantially.
    Expenditures reported are the direct out-of-pocket expenditures. Indirect expenditures, which may be significant, may be reflected elsewhere. For example, rental contracts often include utilities. Renters with such contracts would record no direct expense for utilities, and therefore, appear to have no utility expenses. Employers or insurance companies frequently pay other costs.CUs with Members whose employers pay for all or part of their health insurance or life insurance would have lower direct expenses for these items than those who pay the entire amount themselves. These points should be considered when relating reported averages to individual circumstances.

    The Diary survey PUMD are organized into five major data files for each quarter: 1. FMLD - a file with characteristics, income, and summary level expenditures for the household 2. MEMD - a file with characteristics and income for each member in the household
    3. EXPD - a detailed weekly expenditure file categorized by UCC 4. DTBD - a detailed annual income file categorized by UCC
    5. DTID - a household imputed income file categorized by UCC

    Analysis unit

    Consumer Unit

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Mode of data collection

    Computer Assisted Personal Interview [capi]

  16. d

    Demography of American black bears (Ursus americanus) in a semiarid...

    • search.dataone.org
    • datadryad.org
    Updated Jan 3, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Brenden M. Orocu; Cambria Armstrong; Janene Auger; Hal L. Black; Randy T. Larsen; Brock R. McMillan; Mark C. Belk (2025). Demography of American black bears (Ursus americanus) in a semiarid environment [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.98sf7m0t8
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 3, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Dryad Digital Repository
    Authors
    Brenden M. Orocu; Cambria Armstrong; Janene Auger; Hal L. Black; Randy T. Larsen; Brock R. McMillan; Mark C. Belk
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The American black bear (Ursus americanus) has one of the broadest geographic distributions of any mammalian carnivore in North America. Populations occur from high to low elevations and from mesic to arid environments, and their demographic traits have been documented in a wide variety of environments. However, the demography of American black bears in semiarid environments, which comprise a significant portion of the geographic range, is poorly documented. To fill this gap in understanding, we used data from a long-term mark-recapture study of black bears in the semiarid environment of eastern Utah, USA. Cub and yearling survival were low and adult survival was high relative to other populations. Adult life stages had the highest reproductive value, comprised the largest proportion of the population, and exhibited the highest elasticity contribution to the population growth rate (i.e., λ). Vital rates of black bears in this semiarid environment are skewed toward higher survival of adu..., Mark-Recapture study We estimated survival rates from long-term mark-recapture data gathered as part of a 27-year study on American black bears of the East Tavaputs Plateau. During the first 12 years of the study (June to August 1991-2003) female bears were captured and radio-collared, and all bears were tagged in the ear, except for cubs and yearlings. For the entire study (1992 – 2019), collared females were visited in their dens annually during their winter hibernation to count newborn cubs and surviving yearlings. Age of individual bears was determined by 2 methods: (1) direct observation of cubs or yearlings (i.e., year of birth was known) or (2) cementum annuli analysis of a cross-section of the root of an extracted premolar (Palochak, 2004; Willey, 1974). The data we used to derive survival and fecundity rates consisted of the ID_number, cohort (cub, yearling, subadult, prime-aged adult, and old adult), age in years, sex (female, male, unknown), number of cubs, number of yearling..., , # Demography of American black bears (Ursus americanus) in a semiarid environment

    https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.98sf7m0t8

    Description of the data and file structure

    Files and variables

    File: Age-Specific_Survivorship.csv

    Description:Â

    This CSV file contains data collected from a mark-recapture study during 1991 - 2019. We calculated the age-specific average survival rate for each cohort. The average survival rate of each cohort was later used in the matrix transition model as matrix elements to retrieve important demographic information about this population of North American black bears (Ursus americanus) found in a semiarid environment.Â

    Variables
    • Cohort:Â Yearling = 1 year to 2 years;Â Subadult = 2 years to 4 years;Â Prime-aged Adult = 4 years to 14 years;Â Old Adult = 15 years and older.
    • Sex:Â M = male; F = female; U = unknown
    • Cubs and Yearlings:Â NV = not visited; number = number of cubs or yearlings presen...
  17. Black and slave population in the United States 1790-1880

    • statista.com
    Updated Aug 12, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Black and slave population in the United States 1790-1880 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1010169/black-and-slave-population-us-1790-1880/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 12, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    There were almost 700 thousand slaves in the US in 1790, which equated to approximately 18 percent of the total population, or roughly one in every six people. By 1860, the final census taken before the American Civil War, there were four million slaves in the South, compared with less than 0.5 million free African Americans in all of the US. Of the 4.4 million African Americans in the US before the war, almost four million of these people were held as slaves; meaning that for all African Americans living in the US in 1860, there was an 89 percent* chance that they lived in slavery. A brief history Trans-Atlantic slavery began in the early sixteenth century, when the Portuguese and Spanish forcefully brought captured African slaves to the New World, in order to work for them. The British Empire introduced slavery to North America on a large scale, and the economy of the British colonies there depended on slave labor, particularly regarding cotton, sugar and tobacco output. In the seventeenth and eighteenth century the number of slaves being brought to the Americas increased exponentially, and at the time of American independence it was legal in all thirteen colonies. Although slavery became increasingly prohibited in the north, the number of slaves remained high during this time as they were simply relocated or sold from the north to the south. It is also important to remember that the children of slaves were also viewed as property, and (apart from some very rare cases) were born into a life of slavery. Abolition and the American Civil War In the years that followed independence, the Northern States began gradually prohibiting slavery, and it was officially abolished there by 1805, and the importation of slave labor was prohibited nationwide from 1808 (although both still existed in practice after this). Business owners in the Southern States however depended on slave labor in order to meet the demand of their rapidly expanding industries, and the issue of slavery continued to polarize American society in the decades to come. This culminated in the election of President Abraham Lincoln in 1860, who promised to prohibit slavery in the newly acquired territories to the west, leading to the American Civil War from 1861 to 1865. Although the Confederacy (south) were victorious in much of the early stages of the war, the strength in numbers of the northern states (including many free, black men), eventually resulted in a victory for the Union (north), and the nationwide abolishment of slavery with the Thirteenth Amendment in 1865. Legacy In total, an estimated twelve to thirteen million Africans were transported to the Americas as slaves, and this does not include the high number who did not survive the journey (which was as high as 23 percent in some years). In the 150 years since the abolishment of slavery in the US, the African-American community have continuously campaigned for equal rights and opportunities that were not afforded to them along with freedom. The most prominent themes have been the Civil Rights Movement, voter suppression, mass incarceration and the relationship between the police and the African-American community has taken the spotlight in recent years.

  18. f

    Weighted mean of continuous variables by mild cognitive impairment status.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 14, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kyle Masato Ishikawa; James Davis; John J. Chen; Eunjung Lim (2023). Weighted mean of continuous variables by mild cognitive impairment status. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269795.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 14, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Kyle Masato Ishikawa; James Davis; John J. Chen; Eunjung Lim
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Weighted mean of continuous variables by mild cognitive impairment status.

  19. f

    Weighted proportion [and 95% confidence interval] of mild cognitive...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 17, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kyle Masato Ishikawa; James Davis; John J. Chen; Eunjung Lim (2023). Weighted proportion [and 95% confidence interval] of mild cognitive impairment by social disconnectedness and perceived isolation. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269795.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 17, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Kyle Masato Ishikawa; James Davis; John J. Chen; Eunjung Lim
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Weighted proportion [and 95% confidence interval] of mild cognitive impairment by social disconnectedness and perceived isolation.

  20. f

    Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment by socio-demographics.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 14, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kyle Masato Ishikawa; James Davis; John J. Chen; Eunjung Lim (2023). Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment by socio-demographics. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269795.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 14, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Kyle Masato Ishikawa; James Davis; John J. Chen; Eunjung Lim
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment by socio-demographics.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2019). Average adult male body weight in the U.S. from 1999 to 2016, by ethnicity [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/955064/adult-male-body-weight-average-us-by-ethnicity/
Organization logo

Average adult male body weight in the U.S. from 1999 to 2016, by ethnicity

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Jan 14, 2019
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Time period covered
1999 - 2016
Area covered
United States
Description

This statistic depicts the average body weight of U.S. men aged 20 years and over from 1999 to 2016, by ethnicity. According to the data, the average male body weight for those that identified as non-Hispanic white has increased from 192.3 in 1999-2000 to 202.2 in 2015-2016.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu