38 datasets found
  1. U.S. poverty rate of the top 25 most populated cities 2021

    • statista.com
    Updated Sep 15, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2022). U.S. poverty rate of the top 25 most populated cities 2021 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/205637/percentage-of-poor-people-in-the-top-20-most-populated-cities-in-the-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 15, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2021
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In 2021, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania was the city with the highest poverty rate of the United States' most populated cities. In this statistic, the cities are sorted by poverty rate, not population. The most populated city in 2021 according to the source was New York city - which had a poverty rate of 18 percent.

  2. Mexico: poverty rate 2022, by state

    • statista.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista, Mexico: poverty rate 2022, by state [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1036147/poverty-rate-mexico-state/
    Explore at:
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2022
    Area covered
    Mexico
    Description

    Two out of every three persons in Chiapas lived under the poverty line in 2022, making it the federal entity with the largest share of poor population in Mexico. On average, about 36 percent of the Mexican population was living in poverty that year.

  3. Vital Signs: Poverty - by city

    • data.bayareametro.gov
    • open-data-demo.mtc.ca.gov
    csv, xlsx, xml
    Updated Dec 12, 2018
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Census Bureau (2018). Vital Signs: Poverty - by city [Dataset]. https://data.bayareametro.gov/dataset/Vital-Signs-Poverty-by-city/if2n-3uk8
    Explore at:
    csv, xlsx, xmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 12, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    Authors
    U.S. Census Bureau
    Description

    VITAL SIGNS INDICATOR Poverty (EQ5)

    FULL MEASURE NAME The share of the population living in households that earn less than 200 percent of the federal poverty limit

    LAST UPDATED December 2018

    DESCRIPTION Poverty refers to the share of the population living in households that earn less than 200 percent of the federal poverty limit, which varies based on the number of individuals in a given household. It reflects the number of individuals who are economically struggling due to low household income levels.

    DATA SOURCE U.S Census Bureau: Decennial Census http://www.nhgis.org (1980-1990) http://factfinder2.census.gov (2000)

    U.S. Census Bureau: American Community Survey Form C17002 (2006-2017) http://api.census.gov

    METHODOLOGY NOTES (across all datasets for this indicator) The U.S. Census Bureau defines a national poverty level (or household income) that varies by household size, number of children in a household, and age of householder. The national poverty level does not vary geographically even though cost of living is different across the United States. For the Bay Area, where cost of living is high and incomes are correspondingly high, an appropriate poverty level is 200% of poverty or twice the national poverty level, consistent with what was used for past equity work at MTC and ABAG. For comparison, however, both the national and 200% poverty levels are presented.

    For Vital Signs, the poverty rate is defined as the number of people (including children) living below twice the poverty level divided by the number of people for whom poverty status is determined. Poverty rates do not include unrelated individuals below 15 years old or people who live in the following: institutionalized group quarters, college dormitories, military barracks, and situations without conventional housing. The household income definitions for poverty change each year to reflect inflation. The official poverty definition uses money income before taxes and does not include capital gains or noncash benefits (such as public housing, Medicaid, and food stamps). For the national poverty level definitions by year, see: https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/threshld/index.html For an explanation on how the Census Bureau measures poverty, see: https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/about/overview/measure.html

    For the American Community Survey datasets, 1-year data was used for region, county, and metro areas whereas 5-year rolling average data was used for city and census tract.

    To be consistent across metropolitan areas, the poverty definition for non-Bay Area metros is twice the national poverty level. Data were not adjusted for varying income and cost of living levels across the metropolitan areas.

  4. Vital Signs: Poverty - by tract

    • data.bayareametro.gov
    csv, xlsx, xml
    Updated Dec 12, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Census Bureau (2018). Vital Signs: Poverty - by tract [Dataset]. https://data.bayareametro.gov/dataset/Vital-Signs-Poverty-by-tract/974p-p6wz
    Explore at:
    csv, xlsx, xmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 12, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    Authors
    U.S. Census Bureau
    Description

    VITAL SIGNS INDICATOR Poverty (EQ5)

    FULL MEASURE NAME The share of the population living in households that earn less than 200 percent of the federal poverty limit

    LAST UPDATED December 2018

    DESCRIPTION Poverty refers to the share of the population living in households that earn less than 200 percent of the federal poverty limit, which varies based on the number of individuals in a given household. It reflects the number of individuals who are economically struggling due to low household income levels.

    DATA SOURCE U.S Census Bureau: Decennial Census http://www.nhgis.org (1980-1990) http://factfinder2.census.gov (2000)

    U.S. Census Bureau: American Community Survey Form C17002 (2006-2017) http://api.census.gov

    METHODOLOGY NOTES (across all datasets for this indicator) The U.S. Census Bureau defines a national poverty level (or household income) that varies by household size, number of children in a household, and age of householder. The national poverty level does not vary geographically even though cost of living is different across the United States. For the Bay Area, where cost of living is high and incomes are correspondingly high, an appropriate poverty level is 200% of poverty or twice the national poverty level, consistent with what was used for past equity work at MTC and ABAG. For comparison, however, both the national and 200% poverty levels are presented.

    For Vital Signs, the poverty rate is defined as the number of people (including children) living below twice the poverty level divided by the number of people for whom poverty status is determined. Poverty rates do not include unrelated individuals below 15 years old or people who live in the following: institutionalized group quarters, college dormitories, military barracks, and situations without conventional housing. The household income definitions for poverty change each year to reflect inflation. The official poverty definition uses money income before taxes and does not include capital gains or noncash benefits (such as public housing, Medicaid, and food stamps). For the national poverty level definitions by year, see: https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/threshld/index.html For an explanation on how the Census Bureau measures poverty, see: https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/about/overview/measure.html

    For the American Community Survey datasets, 1-year data was used for region, county, and metro areas whereas 5-year rolling average data was used for city and census tract.

    To be consistent across metropolitan areas, the poverty definition for non-Bay Area metros is twice the national poverty level. Data were not adjusted for varying income and cost of living levels across the metropolitan areas.

  5. c

    Census ACS Poverty Status Map - By Census Tract, County, and State

    • data.cityofrochester.gov
    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Mar 4, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Open_Data_Admin (2020). Census ACS Poverty Status Map - By Census Tract, County, and State [Dataset]. https://data.cityofrochester.gov/maps/49093605a9234236998175f4be79ff51
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 4, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Open_Data_Admin
    Area covered
    Description

    Note: These layers were compiled by Esri's Demographics Team using data from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey. These data sets are not owned by the City of Rochester.Overview of the map/data: This map shows the percentage of the population living below the federal poverty level over the previous 12 months, shown by tract, county, and state boundaries. Estimates are from the 2018 ACS 5-year samples. This service is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis. Current Vintage: 2019-2023ACS Table(s): B17020, C17002Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: December 12, 2024National Figures: data.census.govThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:This layer will be updated automatically when the most current vintage of ACS data is released each year, usually in December. The layer always contains the latest available ACS 5-year estimates. It is updated annually within days of the Census Bureau's release schedule. Click here to learn more about ACS data releases.Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases. Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines clipped for cartographic purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2010 AWATER (Area Water) boundaries offered by TIGER. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters). The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto Rico.Census tracts with no population are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -555555...) have been set to null. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small. NOTE: any calculated percentages or counts that contain estimates that have null margins of error yield null margins of error for the calculated fields.

  6. M

    Vital Signs: Poverty - Bay Area

    • open-data-demo.mtc.ca.gov
    • data.bayareametro.gov
    csv, xlsx, xml
    Updated Jan 8, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Census Bureau (2019). Vital Signs: Poverty - Bay Area [Dataset]. https://open-data-demo.mtc.ca.gov/widgets/38fe-vd33
    Explore at:
    xml, csv, xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 8, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    U.S. Census Bureau
    Area covered
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Description

    VITAL SIGNS INDICATOR Poverty (EQ5)

    FULL MEASURE NAME The share of the population living in households that earn less than 200 percent of the federal poverty limit

    LAST UPDATED December 2018

    DESCRIPTION Poverty refers to the share of the population living in households that earn less than 200 percent of the federal poverty limit, which varies based on the number of individuals in a given household. It reflects the number of individuals who are economically struggling due to low household income levels.

    DATA SOURCE U.S Census Bureau: Decennial Census http://www.nhgis.org (1980-1990) http://factfinder2.census.gov (2000)

    U.S. Census Bureau: American Community Survey Form C17002 (2006-2017) http://api.census.gov

    METHODOLOGY NOTES (across all datasets for this indicator) The U.S. Census Bureau defines a national poverty level (or household income) that varies by household size, number of children in a household, and age of householder. The national poverty level does not vary geographically even though cost of living is different across the United States. For the Bay Area, where cost of living is high and incomes are correspondingly high, an appropriate poverty level is 200% of poverty or twice the national poverty level, consistent with what was used for past equity work at MTC and ABAG. For comparison, however, both the national and 200% poverty levels are presented.

    For Vital Signs, the poverty rate is defined as the number of people (including children) living below twice the poverty level divided by the number of people for whom poverty status is determined. Poverty rates do not include unrelated individuals below 15 years old or people who live in the following: institutionalized group quarters, college dormitories, military barracks, and situations without conventional housing. The household income definitions for poverty change each year to reflect inflation. The official poverty definition uses money income before taxes and does not include capital gains or noncash benefits (such as public housing, Medicaid, and food stamps). For the national poverty level definitions by year, see: https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/threshld/index.html For an explanation on how the Census Bureau measures poverty, see: https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/about/overview/measure.html

    For the American Community Survey datasets, 1-year data was used for region, county, and metro areas whereas 5-year rolling average data was used for city and census tract.

    To be consistent across metropolitan areas, the poverty definition for non-Bay Area metros is twice the national poverty level. Data were not adjusted for varying income and cost of living levels across the metropolitan areas.

  7. d

    Poverty Rate

    • data.ore.dc.gov
    Updated Aug 28, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Washington, DC (2024). Poverty Rate [Dataset]. https://data.ore.dc.gov/datasets/poverty-rate
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 28, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Washington, DC
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    ACS 1-year estimates are based on data collected over one calendar year, offering more current information but with a higher margin of error. ACS 5-year estimates combine five years of data, providing more reliable information but less current. Both are based on probability samples. Some racial and ethnic categories are suppressed to avoid misleading estimates when the relative standard error exceeds 30%.

    Data Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 1- & 5-Year Estimates

    Why This Matters

    Poverty threatens the overall well-being of individuals and families, limiting access to stable housing, healthy foods, health care, and educational and employment opportunities, among other basic needs.Poverty is associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes, including chronic physical and mental illness, lower life expectancy, developmental delays, and others.

    Racist policies and practices have contributed to racial economic inequities. Nationally, Black, Indigenous, and people of color experience poverty at higher rates than white Americans, on average.

    The District's Response

    Boosting assistance programs that provide temporary cash and health benefits to help low-income residents meet their basic needs, including Medicaid, TANF For District Families, SNAP, etc.

    Housing assistance and employment and career training programs to support resident’s housing and employment security. These include the Emergency Rental Assistance Program, Permanent Supportive Housing vouchers, Career MAP, the DC Infrastructure Academy, among other programs and services.

    Creation of the DC Commission on Poverty to study poverty issues, evaluate poverty reduction initiatives, and make recommendations to the Mayor and the Council.

  8. ACS 2020 Poverty

    • opendata.atlantaregional.com
    • gisdata.fultoncountyga.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Apr 20, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Georgia Association of Regional Commissions (2022). ACS 2020 Poverty [Dataset]. https://opendata.atlantaregional.com/maps/e2a12cad189449699acae6dba84b8906
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 20, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    The Georgia Association of Regional Commissions
    Authors
    Georgia Association of Regional Commissions
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    This dataset was developed by the Research & Analytics Group at the Atlanta Regional Commission using data from the U.S. Census Bureau across all standard and custom geographies at statewide summary level where applicable.

    For a deep dive into the data model including every specific metric, see the ACS 2016-2020 Data Manifest. The manifest details ARC-defined naming conventions, field names/descriptions and topics, summary levels; source tables; notes and so forth for all metrics.

    Prefixes:

    None

    Count

    p

    Percent

    r

    Rate

    m

    Median

    a

    Mean (average)

    t

    Aggregate (total)

    ch

    Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)

    pch

    Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)

    chp

    Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)

    s

    Significance flag for change: 1 = statistically significant with a 90% CI, 0 = not statistically significant, blank = cannot be computed

    Suffixes:

    _e20

    Estimate from 2016-20 ACS

    _m20

    Margin of Error from 2016-20 ACS

    _e10

    2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography

    _m10

    Margin of Error from 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography

    _e10_20

    Change, 2010-20 (holding constant at 2020 geography)

    Geographies

    AAA = Area Agency on Aging (12 geographic units formed from counties providing statewide coverage)

    ARWDB7 = Atlanta Regional Workforce Development Board (7 counties merged to a single geographic unit)

    Census Tracts (statewide)

    CFGA23 = Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta (23 counties merged to a single geographic unit)

    City (statewide)

    City of Atlanta Council Districts (City of Atlanta)

    City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit (City of Atlanta)

    City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit STV (subarea of City of Atlanta)

    City of Atlanta Neighborhood Statistical Areas (City of Atlanta)

    County (statewide)

    Georgia House (statewide)

    Georgia Senate (statewide)

    MetroWater15 = Atlanta Metropolitan Water District (15 counties merged to a single geographic unit)

    Regional Commissions (statewide)

    State of Georgia (statewide)

    Superdistrict (ARC region)

    US Congress (statewide)

    UWGA13 = United Way of Greater Atlanta (13 counties merged to a single geographic unit)

    WFF = Westside Future Fund (subarea of City of Atlanta)

    ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (statewide)

    The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.

    The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2016-2020). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.

    For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.

    Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission Date: 2016-2020 Data License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC by 4.0)

    Link to the manifest: https://opendata.atlantaregional.com/documents/GARC::acs-2020-data-manifest/about

  9. Median Household Income by City

    • data.wu.ac.at
    csv, json, xml
    Updated Dec 15, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    United States Census Bureau American Community Survey (2015). Median Household Income by City [Dataset]. https://data.wu.ac.at/schema/performance_smcgov_org/aGVxZS1rdWpt
    Explore at:
    csv, xml, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 15, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    Description

    Data about the general economic characteristics of the population of San Mateo County, by City. This dataset includes information on employment, unemployment, median household income, health insurance coverage, and families and people whose income in the past 12 months is below the poverty level. This data was extracted from the United States Cenus Bureau's American Community Survey 2014 5 year estimates.

  10. Poverty (by Atlanta City Council Districts) 2017

    • opendata.atlantaregional.com
    Updated Jun 23, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Georgia Association of Regional Commissions (2019). Poverty (by Atlanta City Council Districts) 2017 [Dataset]. https://opendata.atlantaregional.com/datasets/poverty-by-atlanta-city-council-districts-2017/api
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 23, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    The Georgia Association of Regional Commissions
    Authors
    Georgia Association of Regional Commissions
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Group of the Atlanta Regional Commission, using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates for 2013-2017, to show population in poverty by Atlanta City Council Districts in the Atlanta region.

    The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.

    The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2013-2017). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.

    For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.

    Naming conventions:

    Prefixes:

    None

    Count

    p

    Percent

    r

    Rate

    m

    Median

    a

    Mean (average)

    t

    Aggregate (total)

    ch

    Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)

    pch

    Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)

    chp

    Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)

    Suffixes:

    None

    Change over two periods

    _e

    Estimate from most recent ACS

    _m

    Margin of Error from most recent ACS

    _00

    Decennial 2000

    Attributes:

    SumLevel

    Summary level of geographic unit (e.g., County, Tract, NSA, NPU, DSNI, SuperDistrict, etc)

    GEOID

    Census tract Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) code

    NAME

    Name of geographic unit

    Planning_Region

    Planning region designation for ARC purposes

    Acres

    Total area within the tract (in acres)

    SqMi

    Total area within the tract (in square miles)

    County

    County identifier (combination of Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) codes for state and county)

    CountyName

    County Name

    PopPovDet_e

    # Population for whom poverty status is determined, 2017

    PopPovDet_m

    # Population for whom poverty status is determined, 2017 (MOE)

    PopPov_e

    # Population below poverty, 2017

    PopPov_m

    # Population below poverty, 2017 (MOE)

    pPopPov_e

    % Population below poverty, 2017

    pPopPov_m

    % Population below poverty, 2017 (MOE)

    PopPovU18Det_e

    # Population under 18 years for whom poverty status is determined, 2017

    PopPovU18Det_m

    # Population under 18 years for whom poverty status is determined, 2017 (MOE)

    PopPovU18_e

    # Population under 18 years below poverty, 2017

    PopPovU18_m

    # Population under 18 years below poverty, 2017 (MOE)

    pPopPovU18_e

    % Population under 18 years below poverty, 2017

    pPopPovU18_m

    % Population under 18 years below poverty, 2017 (MOE)

    PopPov18_64Det_e

    # Population 18 to 64 years for whom poverty status is determined, 2017

    PopPov18_64Det_m

    # Population 18 to 64 years for whom poverty status is determined, 2017 (MOE)

    PopPov18_64_e

    # Population 18 to 64 years below poverty, 2017

    PopPov18_64_m

    # Population 18 to 64 years below poverty, 2017 (MOE)

    pPopPov18_64_e

    % Population 18 to 64 years below poverty, 2017

    pPopPov18_64_m

    % Population 18 to 64 years below poverty, 2017 (MOE)

    PopPov65PDet_e

    # Population 65 years and over for whom poverty status is determined, 2017

    PopPov65PDet_m

    # Population 65 years and over for whom poverty status is determined, 2017 (MOE)

    PopPov65P_e

    # Population 65 years and over below poverty, 2017

    PopPov65P_m

    # Population 65 years and over below poverty, 2017 (MOE)

    pPopPov65P_e

    % Population 65 years and over below poverty, 2017

    pPopPov65P_m

    % Population 65 years and over below poverty, 2017 (MOE)

    FamWChildPovStat_e

    # Families with related children, 2017

    FamWChildPovStat_m

    # Families with related children, 2017 (MOE)

    FamWChild150Pov_e

    # Families with related children below 150 percent of the poverty line, 2017

    FamWChild150Pov_m

    # Families with related children below 150 percent of the poverty line, 2017 (MOE)

    pFamWChild150Pov_e

    % Families with related children below 150 percent of the poverty line, 2017

    pFamWChild150Pov_m

    % Families with related children below 150 percent of the poverty line, 2017 (MOE)

    ChildPovStatRatio_e

    # Children for whom poverty status is determined, 2017

    ChildPovStatRatio_m

    # Children for whom poverty status is determined, 2017 (MOE)

    ChildInFam200Pov_e

    # Children in families below 200 percent of the poverty line, 2017

    ChildInFam200Pov_m

    # Children in families below 200 percent of the poverty line, 2017 (MOE)

    pChildInFam200Pov_e

    % Children in families below 200 percent of the poverty line, 2017

    pChildInFam200Pov_m

    % Children in families below 200 percent of the poverty line, 2017 (MOE)

    last_edited_date

    Last date the feature was edited by ARC

    Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission

    Date: 2013-2017

    For additional information, please visit the Census ACS website.

  11. t

    Low Income Community Census Tracts - 2016 ACS

    • data.toledo.gov
    • anrgeodata.vermont.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Jun 2, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Toledo (2021). Low Income Community Census Tracts - 2016 ACS [Dataset]. https://data.toledo.gov/datasets/low-income-community-census-tracts-2016-acs
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Toledo
    Area covered
    Description

    This layer contains 2012-2016 American Community Survey values used to determine if a community is considered a low-income community as defined by Code Section 45D(e). The map highlights if a census tract qualifies by the following considerations:the poverty rate is at least 20 percent, orthe median family income does not exceed 80 percent of statewide median family income or, if in a metropolitan area, the great of 80 percent statewide median family income or 80 percent of metropolitan area median family incomeThe popup highlights the poverty rate, the median family income, and the state family income. If a tract falls into a metropolitan area, it will also include the metro area family income. This data was downloaded from the United States Census Bureau American Fact Finder. Vintage 2012-2016 ACS estimates:Table B19113 - Median Family Income - Tract, Metro Area, and State data values were pulledTable S1701 - Poverty Status in the Past 12 months- Tract data values were pulled

  12. Low income statistics by age, sex and economic family type

    • www150.statcan.gc.ca
    • open.canada.ca
    Updated Nov 7, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Government of Canada, Statistics Canada (2025). Low income statistics by age, sex and economic family type [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25318/1110013501-eng
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 7, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Statistics Canadahttps://statcan.gc.ca/en
    Area covered
    Canada
    Description

    Number of persons in low income, low income rate and average gap ratio by age, sex and economic family type, annual.

  13. Poverty 2023 (all geographies, statewide)

    • gisdata.fultoncountyga.gov
    • opendata.atlantaregional.com
    Updated Feb 21, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Georgia Association of Regional Commissions (2025). Poverty 2023 (all geographies, statewide) [Dataset]. https://gisdata.fultoncountyga.gov/maps/9d1dc0e3c9e344f2b379a09c0a1be7e5
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 21, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    The Georgia Association of Regional Commissions
    Authors
    Georgia Association of Regional Commissions
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    These data were developed by the Research & Analytics Department at the Atlanta Regional Commission using data from the U.S. Census Bureau across all standard and custom geographies at statewide summary level where applicable.For a deep dive into the data model including every specific metric, see the ACS 2019-2023. The manifest details ARC-defined naming conventions, field names/descriptions and topics, summary levels; source tables; notes and so forth for all metrics. Find naming convention prefixes/suffixes, geography definitions and user notes below.Prefixes:NoneCountpPercentrRatemMedianaMean (average)tAggregate (total)chChange in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)pchPercent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)chpChange in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)sSignificance flag for change: 1 = statistically significant with a 90% CI, 0 = not statistically significant, blank = cannot be computedSuffixes:_e23Estimate from 2019-23 ACS_m23Margin of Error from 2019-23 ACS_e102006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography_m10Margin of Error from 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography_e10_23Change, 2010-23 (holding constant at 2020 geography)GeographiesAAA = Area Agency on Aging (12 geographic units formed from counties providing statewide coverage)ARC21 = Atlanta Regional Commission modeling area (21 counties merged to a single geographic unit)ARWDB7 = Atlanta Regional Workforce Development Board (7 counties merged to a single geographic unit)BeltLineStatistical (buffer)BeltLineStatisticalSub (subareas)Census Tract (statewide)CFGA23 = Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta (23 counties merged to a single geographic unit)City (statewide)City of Atlanta Council Districts (City of Atlanta)City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit (City of Atlanta)City of Atlanta Neighborhood Statistical Areas (City of Atlanta)County (statewide)CCDIST = County Commission Districts (statewide where applicable)CCSUPERDIST = County Commission Superdistricts (DeKalb)Georgia House (statewide)Georgia Senate (statewide)HSSA = High School Statistical Area (11 county region)MetroWater15 = Atlanta Metropolitan Water District (15 counties merged to a single geographic unit)Regional Commissions (statewide)State of Georgia (single geographic unit)Superdistrict (ARC region)US Congress (statewide)UWGA13 = United Way of Greater Atlanta (13 counties merged to a single geographic unit)ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (statewide)The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent. The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2019-2023). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available. For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional CommissionDate: 2019-2023Open Data License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC by 4.0)Link to the data manifest: https://opendata.atlantaregional.com/documents/182e6fcf8201449086b95adf39471831/about

  14. w

    Concentrations of Protected Classes from Analysis of Impediments

    • data.wu.ac.at
    application/excel +5
    Updated Sep 22, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Lauren (2017). Concentrations of Protected Classes from Analysis of Impediments [Dataset]. https://data.wu.ac.at/odso/data_austintexas_gov/NjkyYi14c2l0
    Explore at:
    xlsx, csv, json, application/excel, xml, application/xml+rdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 22, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    Lauren
    Description

    A new component of fair housing studies is an analysis of the opportunities residents are afforded in “racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty,” also called RCAPs or ECAPs. An RCAP or ECAP is a neighborhood with significant concentrations of extreme poverty and minority populations. HUD’s definition of an RCAP/ECAP is: • A Census tract that has a non‐white population of 50 percent or more AND a poverty rate of 40 percent or more; OR • A Census tract that has a non‐white population of 50 percent or more AND the poverty rate is three times the average tract poverty rate for the metro/micro area, whichever is lower.

    Why the 40 percent threshold? The RCAP/ECAP definition is not meant to suggest that a slightly‐lower‐than‐40 percent poverty rate is ideal or acceptable. The threshold was borne out of research that concluded a 40 percent poverty rate was the point at which a neighborhood became significantly socially and economically challenged. Conversely, research has shown that areas with up to 14 percent of poverty have no noticeable effect on community opportunity. (See Section II in City of Austin’s 2015 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice: http://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/NHCD/Reports_Publications/1Analysis_Impediments_for_web.pdf)

    This dataset provides socioeconomic data on protected classes from the 2008-2012 American Community Survey on census tracts in Austin’s city limits and designates which of those tracts are considered RCAPs or ECAPs based on these socioeconomic characteristics. A map of the census tracts designated as RCAPs or ECAPs is attached to this dataset and downloadable as a pdf (see below).

  15. Poverty 2021 (all geographies, statewide)

    • opendata.atlantaregional.com
    Updated Mar 10, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Georgia Association of Regional Commissions (2023). Poverty 2021 (all geographies, statewide) [Dataset]. https://opendata.atlantaregional.com/maps/dced52c3bb1946e68f8f8afbc7710798
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 10, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    The Georgia Association of Regional Commissions
    Authors
    Georgia Association of Regional Commissions
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    This dataset was developed by the Research & Analytics Group at the Atlanta Regional Commission using data from the U.S. Census Bureau across all standard and custom geographies at statewide summary level where applicable. For a deep dive into the data model including every specific metric, see the ACS 2017-2021 Data Manifest. The manifest details ARC-defined naming conventions, field names/descriptions and topics, summary levels; source tables; notes and so forth for all metrics. Find naming convention prefixes/suffixes, geography definitions and user notes below.Prefixes:NoneCountpPercentrRatemMedianaMean (average)tAggregate (total)chChange in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)pchPercent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)chpChange in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)sSignificance flag for change: 1 = statistically significant with a 90% CI, 0 = not statistically significant, blank = cannot be computedSuffixes:_e21Estimate from 2017-21 ACS_m21Margin of Error from 2017-21 ACS_e102006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography_m10Margin of Error from 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography_e10_21Change, 2010-21 (holding constant at 2020 geography)GeographiesAAA = Area Agency on Aging (12 geographic units formed from counties providing statewide coverage)ARC21 = Atlanta Regional Commission modeling area (21 counties merged to a single geographic unit)ARWDB7 = Atlanta Regional Workforce Development Board (7 counties merged to a single geographic unit)BeltLine (buffer)BeltLine Study (subareas)Census Tract (statewide)CFGA23 = Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta (23 counties merged to a single geographic unit)City (statewide)City of Atlanta Council Districts (City of Atlanta)City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit (City of Atlanta)City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit STV (3 NPUs merged to a single geographic unit within City of Atlanta)City of Atlanta Neighborhood Statistical Areas (City of Atlanta)City of Atlanta Neighborhood Statistical Areas E02E06 (2 NSAs merged to single geographic unit within City of Atlanta)County (statewide)Georgia House (statewide)Georgia Senate (statewide)MetroWater15 = Atlanta Metropolitan Water District (15 counties merged to a single geographic unit)Regional Commissions (statewide)SPARCC = Strong, Prosperous And Resilient Communities ChallengeState of Georgia (single geographic unit)Superdistrict (ARC region)US Congress (statewide)UWGA13 = United Way of Greater Atlanta (13 counties merged to a single geographic unit)WFF = Westside Future Fund (subarea of City of Atlanta)ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (statewide)The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent. The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2017-2021). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available. For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional CommissionDate: 2017-2021Data License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC by 4.0)Link to the data manifest: https://garc.maps.arcgis.com/sharing/rest/content/items/34b9adfdcc294788ba9c70bf433bd4c1/data

  16. a

    Detroit Demographic Analysis

    • africageoportal.com
    Updated Feb 13, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Africa GeoPortal (2021). Detroit Demographic Analysis [Dataset]. https://www.africageoportal.com/datasets/africageoportal::detroit-demographic-analysis-3
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 13, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Africa GeoPortal
    Description

    This map app shows demographic and income data in Detroit. Assuming an assignment where the poverty fighting charity I work for would like to alleviate suffering among impoverished children in Detroit. Detroit is a Michigan city that always ranks among America's poorest urban centers. Orange circles have below average median household income, the darker shades indicate households with a very low income-close to poverty level. The size of the circles: larger circles indicate a greater number of children in the area.What stands out is the obvioud pattern of low-income households in the city center combined with areas of high child population. This pattern helps answer where in Detroit our charity will focus its resources to help children living in poverty-in places shown on the map where there is a cluster of several large dark Orange circles like Dearborn and Pontiac (for example). The charity may and will offer free after school care and/Or but not limited to breakfast programs.

  17. a

    City of Scranton - ARPA Eligibility Map

    • scranton-open-data-scrantonplanning.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Sep 26, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Scranton GIS (2022). City of Scranton - ARPA Eligibility Map [Dataset]. https://scranton-open-data-scrantonplanning.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/city-of-scranton-arpa-eligibility-map
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 26, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Scranton GIS
    License

    ODC Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) v1.0http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Scranton
    Description

    This map shows census block groups that are eligible for ARPA funding in the City of Scranton.Disproportionately Impacted CommunitiesLow-income households and communities are those with (i) income at or below 185 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines for the size of its household based on the most recently published poverty guidelines or (ii) income at or below 40 percent of area median income for its county and size of household based on the most recently published data. For the City of Scranton, this equals a median household income of less than $42605Qualified Census TractsQualified Census Tracts must have 50 percent of households with incomes below 60 percent of the Area Median Gross Income (AMGI) or have a poverty rate of 25 percent or more.

  18. Poverty (by Atlanta City Council Districts) 2018

    • opendata.atlantaregional.com
    Updated Mar 4, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Georgia Association of Regional Commissions (2020). Poverty (by Atlanta City Council Districts) 2018 [Dataset]. https://opendata.atlantaregional.com/datasets/18023b1af0d044deba3643d992fbcf3c
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 4, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    The Georgia Association of Regional Commissions
    Authors
    Georgia Association of Regional Commissions
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Division of the Atlanta Regional Commission using data from the U.S. Census Bureau.

    The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.

    The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2014-2018). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.

    For a deep dive into the data model including every specific metric, see the Infrastructure Manifest. The manifest details ARC-defined naming conventions, field names/descriptions and topics, summary levels; source tables; notes and so forth for all metrics.

    For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.

    Naming conventions:

    Prefixes:

    None

    Count

    p

    Percent

    r

    Rate

    m

    Median

    a

    Mean (average)

    t

    Aggregate (total)

    ch

    Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)

    pch

    Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)

    chp

    Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)

    s

    Significance flag for change: 1 = statistically significant with a 90% Confidence Interval, 0 = not statistically significant, blank = cannot be computed

    Suffixes:

    _e18

    Estimate from 2014-18 ACS

    _m18

    Margin of Error from 2014-18 ACS

    _00_v18

    Decennial 2000 in 2018 geography boundary

    _00_18

    Change, 2000-18

    _e10_v18

    Estimate from 2006-10 ACS in 2018 geography boundary

    _m10_v18

    Margin of Error from 2006-10 ACS in 2018 geography boundary

    _e10_18

    Change, 2010-18

  19. Risk of poverty rate in the 15 largest cities in Germany 2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Jan 13, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista Research Department (2025). Risk of poverty rate in the 15 largest cities in Germany 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/topics/10455/poverty-in-germany/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 13, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Authors
    Statista Research Department
    Area covered
    Germany
    Description

    In 2023, around 27.4 percent of residents in Bremen were at risk of living in poverty. This list shows the 15 cities in Germany with the highest at-risk-of-poverty rates.

  20. ACS2020 Economic Poverty RC

    • opendata.atlantaregional.com
    • fultoncountyopendata-fulcogis.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Apr 20, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Georgia Association of Regional Commissions (2022). ACS2020 Economic Poverty RC [Dataset]. https://opendata.atlantaregional.com/datasets/acs2020-economic-poverty-rc
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 20, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    The Georgia Association of Regional Commissions
    Authors
    Georgia Association of Regional Commissions
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    This dataset was developed by the Research & Analytics Group at the Atlanta Regional Commission using data from the U.S. Census Bureau across all standard and custom geographies at statewide summary level where applicable.

    For a deep dive into the data model including every specific metric, see the ACS 2016-2020 Data Manifest. The manifest details ARC-defined naming conventions, field names/descriptions and topics, summary levels; source tables; notes and so forth for all metrics.

    Prefixes:

    None

    Count

    p

    Percent

    r

    Rate

    m

    Median

    a

    Mean (average)

    t

    Aggregate (total)

    ch

    Change in absolute terms (value in t2 - value in t1)

    pch

    Percent change ((value in t2 - value in t1) / value in t1)

    chp

    Change in percent (percent in t2 - percent in t1)

    s

    Significance flag for change: 1 = statistically significant with a 90% CI, 0 = not statistically significant, blank = cannot be computed

    Suffixes:

    _e20

    Estimate from 2016-20 ACS

    _m20

    Margin of Error from 2016-20 ACS

    _e10

    2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography

    _m10

    Margin of Error from 2006-10 ACS, re-estimated to 2020 geography

    _e10_20

    Change, 2010-20 (holding constant at 2020 geography)

    Geographies

    AAA = Area Agency on Aging (12 geographic units formed from counties providing statewide coverage)

    ARWDB7 = Atlanta Regional Workforce Development Board (7 counties merged to a single geographic unit)

    Census Tracts (statewide)

    CFGA23 = Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta (23 counties merged to a single geographic unit)

    City (statewide)

    City of Atlanta Council Districts (City of Atlanta)

    City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit (City of Atlanta)

    City of Atlanta Neighborhood Planning Unit STV (subarea of City of Atlanta)

    City of Atlanta Neighborhood Statistical Areas (City of Atlanta)

    County (statewide)

    Georgia House (statewide)

    Georgia Senate (statewide)

    MetroWater15 = Atlanta Metropolitan Water District (15 counties merged to a single geographic unit)

    Regional Commissions (statewide)

    State of Georgia (statewide)

    Superdistrict (ARC region)

    US Congress (statewide)

    UWGA13 = United Way of Greater Atlanta (13 counties merged to a single geographic unit)

    WFF = Westside Future Fund (subarea of City of Atlanta)

    ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (statewide)

    The user should note that American Community Survey data represent estimates derived from a surveyed sample of the population, which creates some level of uncertainty, as opposed to an exact measure of the entire population (the full census count is only conducted once every 10 years and does not cover as many detailed characteristics of the population). Therefore, any measure reported by ACS should not be taken as an exact number – this is why a corresponding margin of error (MOE) is also given for ACS measures. The size of the MOE relative to its corresponding estimate value provides an indication of confidence in the accuracy of each estimate. Each MOE is expressed in the same units as its corresponding measure; for example, if the estimate value is expressed as a number, then its MOE will also be a number; if the estimate value is expressed as a percent, then its MOE will also be a percent.

    The user should also note that for relatively small geographic areas, such as census tracts shown here, ACS only releases combined 5-year estimates, meaning these estimates represent rolling averages of survey results that were collected over a 5-year span (in this case 2016-2020). Therefore, these data do not represent any one specific point in time or even one specific year. For geographic areas with larger populations, 3-year and 1-year estimates are also available.

    For further explanation of ACS estimates and margin of error, visit Census ACS website.

    Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional Commission Date: 2016-2020 Data License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC by 4.0)

    Link to the manifest: https://opendata.atlantaregional.com/documents/GARC::acs-2020-data-manifest/about

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2022). U.S. poverty rate of the top 25 most populated cities 2021 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/205637/percentage-of-poor-people-in-the-top-20-most-populated-cities-in-the-us/
Organization logo

U.S. poverty rate of the top 25 most populated cities 2021

Explore at:
8 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Sep 15, 2022
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Time period covered
2021
Area covered
United States
Description

In 2021, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania was the city with the highest poverty rate of the United States' most populated cities. In this statistic, the cities are sorted by poverty rate, not population. The most populated city in 2021 according to the source was New York city - which had a poverty rate of 18 percent.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu