Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Key information about Kazakhstan Household Income per Capita
This map shows the average household size in Kazakhstan in 2022, in a multiscale map (Country and Region). Nationally, the average household size is 3.4 people per household. It is calculated by dividing the household population by total households.The pop-up is configured to show the following information at each geography level:Average household size (people per household)Total populationTotal householdsCounts of population by 15-year age incrementsCounts of population by marital status The source of this data is Michael Bauer Research. The vintage of the data is 2022. This item was last updated in November, 2022 and is updated every 12-18 months as new annual figures are offered.Additional Esri Resources:Esri DemographicsThis item is for visualization purposes only and cannot be exported or used in analysis.We would love to hear from you. If you have any feedback regarding this item or Esri Demographics, please let us know.Permitted use of this data is covered in the DATA section of the Esri Master Agreement (E204CW) and these supplemental terms.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Key information about Kazakhstan Household Expenditure per Capita
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Kazakhstan Average Monthly State Social Benefits: Loss of Family Provider: Civilians data was reported at 32,007.000 KZT in Jun 2018. This records a decrease from the previous number of 32,118.000 KZT for Mar 2018. Kazakhstan Average Monthly State Social Benefits: Loss of Family Provider: Civilians data is updated quarterly, averaging 11,712.000 KZT from Dec 2000 (Median) to Jun 2018, with 71 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 32,118.000 KZT in Mar 2018 and a record low of 4,144.000 KZT in Dec 2000. Kazakhstan Average Monthly State Social Benefits: Loss of Family Provider: Civilians data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by The Agency of Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Kazakhstan – Table KZ.G030: Average Monthly Pension and State Social Benefits.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Kazakhstan Average Monthly State Social Benefits: Loss of Family Provider: Military Service data was reported at 26,290.000 KZT in Mar 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 23,083.000 KZT for Dec 2017. Kazakhstan Average Monthly State Social Benefits: Loss of Family Provider: Military Service data is updated quarterly, averaging 11,077.500 KZT from Dec 2000 (Median) to Mar 2018, with 70 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 26,290.000 KZT in Mar 2018 and a record low of 5,992.000 KZT in Sep 2001. Kazakhstan Average Monthly State Social Benefits: Loss of Family Provider: Military Service data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by The Agency of Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Kazakhstan – Table KZ.G030: Average Monthly Pension and State Social Benefits.
The 1995 Kazakstan Demographic and Health Survey (KDHS) is part of the worldwide Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) program, which is designed to collect data on fertility, family planning and maternal and child health. The 1995 KDHS was the first national level population and health survey in Kazakstan. The purpose of the survey was to provide the Ministry of Health of Kazakstan with information on fertility, reproductive practices of women, maternal care, child health and mortality, child nutrition practices, breastfeeding, nutritional status and anemia. This information is important for understanding the factors that influence the reproductive health of women and the health and survival of infants and young children. It can be used in planning effective policies and programs regarding the health and nutrition of women and their children. This is especially important now during this the time of economic transition which involves virtually all aspects of life for the people of Kazakstan. The survey provides data important to the assessment of the overall demographic situation in the country. It is expected that the findings of the KDHS will become a useful source of information necessary for the ongoing health care reform in Kazakstan.
National
Sample survey data
The 1995 KDHS employed a nationally representative probability sample of women age 15-49. The country was divided into five survey regions. Four survey regions consisted of groups of contiguous oblasts (except the East Kazakstanskaya oblast which is not contiguous). Almaty City constituted a survey region by itself although it is part of the Almatinskaya oblast. The five survey regions were defined as follows:
I) Almaty City 2) South Region: Taldy-Korganskaya, Almatinskaya (except Almaty city), Dzhambylskaya, South Kazakstanskaya, and Kzyl-Ordinskaya 3) West Region: Aktiubinskaya, Mangistauskaya, Atyrauskaya, and West Kazakstanskaya 4) Central Region: Semipalatinskaya, Zhezkazganskaya, and Tourgaiskaya 5) North and East Region: East Kazakstanskaya, Pavlodarskaya, Karagandinskaya, Akmolinskaya, Kokchetauskaya, North Kazakstanskaya, and Koustanaiskaya
It is important to note that the oblast composition of regions outside of Almaty City was determined on the basis of geographic proximity, and in order to achieve similarity with respect to reproductive practices within regions. The South and West Regions are comprised of oblasts which traditionally have a high proportion of Kazak population and high fertility levels. The Central Region contains three oblasts in which the fertility level is similar to the national average. The North and East Region contains seven oblasts situated in northern Kazakstan in which a relatively high proportion of the population is of Russian origin, and the fertility level is lower than the national average.
In Almaty City, the sample for the 1995 KDHS was selected in two stages. In the first stage, 40 census counting blocks were selected with equal probability from the 1989 list of census counting blocks. A complete listing of the households in the selected counting blocks was carried out. The lists of households served as the frame for second-stage sampling; i.e., the selection of the households to be visited by the KDHS interviewing teams. In each selected household, women age 15-49 were eligible to be interviewed.
In the rural areas, the primary sampling units (PSUs) were the raions which were selected with probability proportional to size, the size being the 1993 population published by Goskomstat (1993). At the second stage, one village was selected in each selected raion, from the 1989 Registry of Villages. This resulted in 50 rural clusters being selected. At the third stage, households were selected in each cluster following the household listing operation as in Almaty City.
In the urban areas other than Almaty City, the PSUs were the cities and towns themselves. In the second stage, one health block was selected from each town except in self-representing cities (large cities that were selected with certainty) where more than one health block was selected. The selected health blocks were segmented prior to the household listing operation which provided the household lists for the third stage selection of households. In total, 86 health blocks were selected.
On average, 22 households were selected in each urban cluster, and 33 households were selected in each rural cluster. It was expected that the sample would yield interviews with approximately 4,000 women between the ages of 15 and 49.
Note: See detailed description of sample design in APPENDIX B of the survey report.
Face-to-face
Two questionnaires were used for the 1995 KDHS: the Household Questionnaire and the Individual Questionnaire. The questionnaires were based on the model survey instruments developed in the DHS program. They were adapted to the data needs of Kazakhstan during consultations with specialists in the areas of reproductive health, child health and nutrition in Kazakhstan.
The Household Questionnaire was used to enumerate all usual members and visitors in tile sample households and to collect information relating to the socioeconomic position of a household. In the: first part of the Household Questionnaire, information was collected on age, sex, educational attainment, marital status, and relationship to the head of household of each person listed as a household member or visitor. A primary objective of the first part of the Household Questionnaire was to identify women who were eligible for the individual interview. In the second part of the Household Questionnaire, questions were included on the dwelling unit, such as the number of rooms, the flooring material, the source of water, the type of toilet facilities, and on the availability of a variety of consumer goods.
The Individual Questionnaire was used to collect information from women age 15-49. These women were asked questions on the following major topics: - Background characteristics - Pregnancy history - Outcome of pregnancies and antenatal care - Child health and nutrition practices - Child immunization and episodes of diarrhea and respiratory illness - Knowledge and use of contraception - Marriage and fertility preferences - Husband's background and woman's work - Anthropometry of children and mothers - Hemoglobin measurement of women and children
One of the major efforts of the 1995 KDHS was testing women and children for iron-deficiency anemia. Testing was done by measuring hemoglobin levels in the blood using the Hemocue technique. Before collecting the blood sample, each woman was asked to sign a consent form giving permission for the collection of a finger-stick blood droplet from herself and her children. Results of anemia testing were kept confidential (as are all KDHS data); however, strictly with the consent of respondents, local health care facilities were informed of women and children who had severely low levels of hemoglobin (less than 7 g/dl).
Questionnaires were returned to the Institute of Nutrition in Almaty for data processing. The office editing staff checked that the questionnaires for all selected households and eligible respondents were returned from the field. The few questions which had not been pre-coded (e.g., occupation, type of chronic disease) were coded at this time. Data were then entered and edited on microcomputers using the ISSA (Integrated System for Survey Analysis) package, with the data entry software translated into Russian. Office editing and data entry activities began in May 1995 (i.e., the same time that fieldwork started) and were completed in September 1995.
A total of 4,480 households were selected in the sample, of which 4,241 were occupied at the time of fieldwork. The main reason for the difference was that some dwelling units which were occupied at the time of the household listing operation were either vacant or the household members were away for an extended period at the time of interviewing. Of the 4,241 occupied households, 4,178 were interviewed, yielding a household response rate of 99 percent.
In the interviewed households, 3,899 women were eligible for the individual interview (i.e., all women 15-49 years of age who were either usual residents or visitors who had spent the previous night in the household). Interviews were successfully completed with 3,771 of these women, yielding a response rate of 97 percent. The principal reason for non-response was the failure to find an eligible woman at home after repeated visits to the household. The overall response rate for the survey--the product of the household and the individual response rates--was 95 percent.
Note: See summarized response rates by place of residence in Table 1.1 of the survey report .
The estimates from a sample survey are affected by two types of errors: (1) non-sampling errors, and (2) sampling errors. Non-sampling errors are the results of mistakes made in implementing data collection and data processing, such as failure to locate and interview the correct household, misunderstanding of the questions on the part of either the interviewer or the respondent, and data entry errors. Although numerous efforts were made during the implementation of the KDHS to minimize this type of error, non-sampling errors are impossible to avoid and difficult to evaluate
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Kazakhstan KZ: Proportion of Population Spending More Than 10% of Household Consumption or Income on Out-of-Pocket Health Care Expenditure: % data was reported at 1.833 % in 2013. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1.952 % for 2012. Kazakhstan KZ: Proportion of Population Spending More Than 10% of Household Consumption or Income on Out-of-Pocket Health Care Expenditure: % data is updated yearly, averaging 2.483 % from Dec 1996 (Median) to 2013, with 14 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.335 % in 1996 and a record low of 1.757 % in 2005. Kazakhstan KZ: Proportion of Population Spending More Than 10% of Household Consumption or Income on Out-of-Pocket Health Care Expenditure: % data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Kazakhstan – Table KZ.World Bank: Poverty. Proportion of population spending more than 10% of household consumption or income on out-of-pocket health care expenditure, expressed as a percentage of a total population of a country; ; Wagstaff et al. Progress on catastrophic health spending: results for 133 countries. A retrospective observational study, Lancet Global Health 2017.; Weighted Average;
In 2023, the total fertility rate in children per woman in Kazakhstan amounted to 3.01. Between 1960 and 2023, the figure dropped by 1.49, though the decline followed an uneven course rather than a steady trajectory.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Household consumption, billion currency units in Kazakhstan, March, 2025 The most recent value is 15863.94 billion Kazakhstan Tenge as of Q1 2025, a decline compared to the previous value of 30188.64 billion Kazakhstan Tenge. Historically, the average for Kazakhstan from Q1 2007 to Q1 2025 is 7263.57 billion Kazakhstan Tenge. The minimum of 1179.62 billion Kazakhstan Tenge was recorded in Q1 2007, while the maximum of 30188.64 billion Kazakhstan Tenge was reached in Q4 2024. | TheGlobalEconomy.com
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Kazakhstan: Furniture and household maintenance prices, world average = 100: The latest value from 2021 is 66.21 index points, a decline from 78.44 index points in 2017. In comparison, the world average is 82.49 index points, based on data from 165 countries. Historically, the average for Kazakhstan from 2017 to 2021 is 72.33 index points. The minimum value, 66.21 index points, was reached in 2021 while the maximum of 78.44 index points was recorded in 2017.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Kazakhstan Number of State Social Benefit Recipients: Military Structures: Loss of Family Provider data was reported at 0.100 Person th in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1.000 Person th for 2016. Kazakhstan Number of State Social Benefit Recipients: Military Structures: Loss of Family Provider data is updated yearly, averaging 1.650 Person th from Dec 2000 (Median) to 2017, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 8.900 Person th in 2001 and a record low of 0.100 Person th in 2017. Kazakhstan Number of State Social Benefit Recipients: Military Structures: Loss of Family Provider data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by The Agency of Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Kazakhstan – Table KZ.G031: Average Monthly Pension and State Social Benefits (Annual).
The Living Standards Measurement Study (LSMS) is a household survey program focused on generating high-quality data, improving survey methods, and building capacity. The goal of the LSMS is to facilitate the use of household survey data for evidence-based policymaking. The aim of this survey was to select objective, representative and as far as possible, total information, which would enable users to draw up a picture of the actual status of living standards of the population of the Republic of Kazakhstan. This information should be the basis for the assessment of efficiency of Government Economic and Social refprms, and should assist in the application of specific levels of social protection.
The whole country.
The main resources of information concerning social and economic indicators of living standard of population of the Republic of Kazakhstan are 6000 households which represent a republican network. The survey LSMS carried was a cultipurpose probability sample which covered 2000 households of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
Sample survey data [ssd]
A Sample designed for LSMS had to assist to:
Data was presented in total for all Kazakhstan (linear distribution of answers) and in different samples according to the purposes of the survey. Grouping of data within Oblasts ensures maximu interest. We did not however carry out an analysis in Oblast sample, since sub-groups which had been defined as a result did not obtain enough volume for representative conclusions. Alternatively we administered a territory (regional) sample through merging several Oblasts within regions. data has been analyses in seven samples in accordance with the purposes of the survey and the wishes of our partners:
To create a basis to design , a probability sample GOSCOMSTAT and its oblast branches in May 1996 have delivered the most actual numerical material concerning population (01-01-1996). it contains the following information:
Face-to-face [f2f]
The questionnaire has been designed in the following stages:
Regarding the Individual Questionnaire, out of 7'223 interviewed persons, 6'955 permanently live in their households (96.3%) and 130 (1.8%) are living inside the most part of their time and 65 (0.9%) oftener living in other places.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Kazakhstan Avg Monthly State Social Benefits: Civilians: Loss of Family Provider data was reported at 27,724.000 KZT in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 25,867.000 KZT for 2016. Kazakhstan Avg Monthly State Social Benefits: Civilians: Loss of Family Provider data is updated yearly, averaging 11,051.000 KZT from Dec 2000 (Median) to 2017, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 27,724.000 KZT in 2017 and a record low of 4,144.000 KZT in 2000. Kazakhstan Avg Monthly State Social Benefits: Civilians: Loss of Family Provider data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by The Agency of Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Kazakhstan – Table KZ.G031: Average Monthly Pension and State Social Benefits (Annual).
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Kazakhstan Avg Monthly State Social Benefits: Military Structures: Loss of Family Provider data was reported at 23,083.000 KZT in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 23,984.000 KZT for 2016. Kazakhstan Avg Monthly State Social Benefits: Military Structures: Loss of Family Provider data is updated yearly, averaging 10,455.000 KZT from Dec 2000 (Median) to 2017, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 23,984.000 KZT in 2016 and a record low of 6,018.000 KZT in 2002. Kazakhstan Avg Monthly State Social Benefits: Military Structures: Loss of Family Provider data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by The Agency of Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Kazakhstan – Table KZ.G031: Average Monthly Pension and State Social Benefits (Annual).
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Kazakhstan Number of State Social Benefit Recipients: Civilians: Loss of Family Provider data was reported at 261.100 Person th in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 262.800 Person th for 2016. Kazakhstan Number of State Social Benefit Recipients: Civilians: Loss of Family Provider data is updated yearly, averaging 319.750 Person th from Dec 1998 (Median) to 2017, with 20 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 376.500 Person th in 2001 and a record low of 261.100 Person th in 2017. Kazakhstan Number of State Social Benefit Recipients: Civilians: Loss of Family Provider data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by The Agency of Statistics of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Kazakhstan – Table KZ.G031: Average Monthly Pension and State Social Benefits (Annual).
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Key information about Kazakhstan Gross Savings Rate
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Kazakhstan KZ: Proportion of Population Spending More Than 25% of Household Consumption or Income on Out-of-Pocket Health Care Expenditure: % data was reported at 0.075 % in 2013. This records a decrease from the previous number of 0.092 % for 2012. Kazakhstan KZ: Proportion of Population Spending More Than 25% of Household Consumption or Income on Out-of-Pocket Health Care Expenditure: % data is updated yearly, averaging 0.132 % from Dec 1996 (Median) to 2013, with 14 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.246 % in 1996 and a record low of 0.045 % in 2011. Kazakhstan KZ: Proportion of Population Spending More Than 25% of Household Consumption or Income on Out-of-Pocket Health Care Expenditure: % data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Kazakhstan – Table KZ.World Bank: Poverty. Proportion of population spending more than 25% of household consumption or income on out-of-pocket health care expenditure, expressed as a percentage of a total population of a country; ; Wagstaff et al. Progress on catastrophic health spending: results for 133 countries. A retrospective observational study, Lancet Global Health 2017.; Weighted Average;
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Kazakhstan KZ: GDP: % of GDP: Final Consumption Expenditure: Household data was reported at 57.743 % in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 56.476 % for 2015. Kazakhstan KZ: GDP: % of GDP: Final Consumption Expenditure: Household data is updated yearly, averaging 56.476 % from Dec 1992 (Median) to 2016, with 25 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 74.922 % in 1993 and a record low of 42.307 % in 2008. Kazakhstan KZ: GDP: % of GDP: Final Consumption Expenditure: Household data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Kazakhstan – Table KZ.World Bank: Gross Domestic Product: Share of GDP. Household final consumption expenditure (formerly private consumption) is the market value of all goods and services, including durable products (such as cars, washing machines, and home computers), purchased by households. It excludes purchases of dwellings but includes imputed rent for owner-occupied dwellings. It also includes payments and fees to governments to obtain permits and licenses. Here, household consumption expenditure includes the expenditures of nonprofit institutions serving households, even when reported separately by the country. This item also includes any statistical discrepancy in the use of resources relative to the supply of resources.; ; World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files.; Weighted Average;
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Key information about Kazakhstan Private Consumption Expenditure
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Kazakhstan KZ: Coverage: Social Safety Net Programs: 3rd Quintile: % of Population data was reported at 29.896 % in 2010. This records an increase from the previous number of 26.357 % for 2007. Kazakhstan KZ: Coverage: Social Safety Net Programs: 3rd Quintile: % of Population data is updated yearly, averaging 28.126 % from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2010, with 2 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 29.896 % in 2010 and a record low of 26.357 % in 2007. Kazakhstan KZ: Coverage: Social Safety Net Programs: 3rd Quintile: % of Population data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Kazakhstan – Table KZ.World Bank: Social Protection. Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.; ; ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, The World Bank. Data are based on national representative household surveys. (datatopics.worldbank.org/aspire/); Simple average;
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Key information about Kazakhstan Household Income per Capita