This dataset contains information about the percent of income households spend on rent in cities in San Mateo County. This data is for renters only, not those who live in owner-occupied homes with or without a mortgage. This data was extracted from the United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey 2014 5 year estimates.

Price to Rent Ratio in the United States increased to 134.20 in the fourth quarter of 2024 from 133.60 in the third quarter of 2024. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for the United States Price to Rent Ratio.

This layer shows housing costs as a percentage of household income. This is shown by tract, county, and state boundaries. This service is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis. Income is based on earnings in past 12 months of survey. This layer is symbolized to show the percent of renter households that spend 30.0% or more of their household income on gross rent (contract rent plus tenant-paid utilities). To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right. Current Vintage: 2019-2023ACS Table(s): B25070, B25091 Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: December 12, 2024National Figures: data.census.govThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. For more information about ACS layers, visit the FAQ. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:This layer is updated automatically when the most current vintage of ACS data is released each year, usually in December. The layer always contains the latest available ACS 5-year estimates. It is updated annually within days of the Census Bureau's release schedule. Click here to learn more about ACS data releases.Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases, specifically, the National Sub-State Geography Database (named tlgdb_(year)_a_us_substategeo.gdb). Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines erased for cartographic and mapping purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2020 Areal Hydrography boundaries offered by TIGER. Water bodies and rivers which are 50 million square meters or larger (mid to large sized water bodies) are erased from the tract level boundaries, as well as additional important features. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 2023 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. These are erased to more accurately portray the coastlines and Great Lakes. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters).The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto RicoCensus tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -4444...) have been set to null, with the exception of -5555... which has been set to zero. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Graph and download economic data for Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: Rent of Primary Residence in U.S. City Average (CUUR0000SEHA) from Dec 1914 to Jun 2025 about primary, rent, urban, consumer, CPI, inflation, price index, indexes, price, and USA.

The present study deals with a special part of sectorial planning: provision of housing. The provision of housing in the Federal Republic of Germany (BRD) is divided in three different areas. Those areas are: Construction and housing industry, the social structure of the inhabitants and the physical structure of housing and housing estates. Governmental intervention measures mainly address those three areas: they try to regulate the housing provision and the rental prices through financial subsidies, the social distribution of housing through definition of target groups and the housing standards through urban planning and technical guidelines. Therefor the scientific investigation of housing provision needs to be about economic, sociological and urban and architectural aspects and needs to relate those aspects. The study of Kerstin Dornhöfer uses an integrated approach of the investigation of housing provision looking at those three aspects. The objective of the study is to develop criteria for the evaluation, planning and implementation of measures for housing provision. “The state controlled housing provision has its origin in the historical development before the Second World War. Besides the material basis of housing provision in the BRD also knowledge about and experiences with comprehensive steering instruments and its effectiveness resulted from the historical development of housing supply and its state controlled steering. This raises the question to what extent this knowledge and experiences had an impact on governmental policies concerning housing provision in the BRD. The description and analysis of the investigation is based on the following guiding questions: - Which steering instruments the BRD uses to achieve higher effectiveness concerning the socio-political postulate of improving the housing circumstances for the broad masses of people? - Could the dependence of housing provision and is governmental steering on the development of the total capital and on landed property , construction and housing construction capital be eliminated or at least gradually controlled? - What was the impact of governmental steering in the BRD? - How did it come to the current discrepancies in spite of all reform efforts and directing interventions? - What conditions were problematic for the improvement of housing circumstances for the broad masses of people? What are the relevant determinants for housing provision? The first part of this study deals with the description of housing provision for broad masses of people since the foundation of the BRD. This time is divided into four periods; each period begins with an important change in laws that indicated a change in in the governmental steering and transformations of economic and social circumstances. The description of the different periods helps to see the governmental steering instruments and its effectiveness regarding the historical circumstances. In the second part of the study the governmental objectives and steering instruments will be questioned and the circumstances of implementation will be identified based in three criteria. Those criteria are: (1) Housing standards and housing quality; (2) rental price (income-rent ratio); (3) Social distribution (broad masses of people as the target group of governmental steering). The question behind this is; if the thesis, which resulted from the historical development of housing provision before the Second World War, that governmental steering only takes place when the economic circumstances require and allow the public intervention and when public pressure forces governmental intervention, is also valid for the BRD.” (Dorhöfer, K., a. a. O., S. 11-13). Data tables in HISTAT: A. Federal Republic of Germany A.01 Development of population, housing stock and occupation density, BRD and West-Berlin (1950-1975) A.02 Ratio of housing stock and private households by size (1950-1974) A.03 Housing completions in the Federal Republic of Germany (1950-1975) A.04 Financing of housing construction in the Federal Republic of Germany, in percent (1950-1975) A.05 Building owners of housing in the Federal Republic of Germany, in percent (1950-1975) A.06 Price indices for residential buildings, cost of living, land without buildings and rents (1950-1975) A.07 Average monthly expenditures per four person worker-household with average income (1950-1975) A.08 Total cost of an apartment in social housing and average land prices in DM (1950-1975) A.09 Average living area, number of rooms per apartment, equipped with central heating system and bathroom in the BRD (1952-1975) A.10 Proportion of apartments per number of rooms per apartment in the Federal Republic of Germany (1952-1973) A.11 Construction activity of non-profit housing companies (1951-1975) A.12 Number of non-profit housing companies and number of members of housing cooperatives (1950-1975) A.13 Housing stock of the nonprofit housing companies and monthly rent (1951-1975) B. West- Berlin B.01 Housing completions in West-Berlin (1950-1975) B.02 Financing of public subsidized social housing construction in West-Berlin, in percent (1955-1975) B.03 Building owners of housing in West-Berlin, in percent (1953-1975) B.04 Average living area, equipped with central heating system and bathroom in West-Berlin (1953-1975) B.05 Proportion of apartments per number of rooms by apartments in West Berlin (1953-1975)

Table from the American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year series on housing tenure and cost related topics for City of Seattle Council Districts, Comprehensive Plan Growth Areas and Community Reporting Areas. Table includes B25003 Tenure of Occupied Housing Units, B25070 Gross Rent as a Percentage of Household Income in the Past 12 Months, B25063 Gross Rent, B25091 Mortgage Status by Selected Monthly Owner Costs as a Percentage of Household Income in the Past 12 Months, B25087 Mortgage Stauts and Selected Monthly Owner Costs, B25064 Median Gross Rent, B25088 Median Selected Monthly Owner Costs by Mortgage Status. Data is pulled from block group tables for the most recent ACS vintage and summarized to the neighborhoods based on block group assignment.Table created for and used in the Neighborhood Profiles application.Vintages: 2023ACS Table(s): B25003, B25070, B25063, B25091, B25087, B25064, B25088Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's Explore Census Data The United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases, specifically, the National Sub-State Geography Database (named tlgdb_(year)_a_us_substategeo.gdb). Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines erased for cartographic and mapping purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2020 Areal Hydrography boundaries offered by TIGER. Water bodies and rivers which are 50 million square meters or larger (mid to large sized water bodies) are erased from the tract level boundaries, as well as additional important features. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 2020 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. These are erased to more accurately portray the coastlines and Great Lakes. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters). The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto RicoCensus tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -4444...) have been set to null, with the exception of -5555... which has been set to zero. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Table from the American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year series for King County and City of Seattle median values for a variety of topics including age, gross rent, monthly owner costs, family and nonfamily incomes, earnings. Includes the margin of error for the values.Table created for and used in the Neighborhood Profiles application.Vintages: 2010, 2015, 2020, 2023ACS Table(s): B01002, B25064, B25088, B19013, B19113, B19202, B20017Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's Explore Census Data The United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases, specifically, the National Sub-State Geography Database (named tlgdb_(year)_a_us_substategeo.gdb). Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines erased for cartographic and mapping purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2020 Areal Hydrography boundaries offered by TIGER. Water bodies and rivers which are 50 million square meters or larger (mid to large sized water bodies) are erased from the tract level boundaries, as well as additional important features. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 2020 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. These are erased to more accurately portray the coastlines and Great Lakes. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters). The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto RicoCensus tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -4444...) have been set to null, with the exception of -5555... which has been set to zero. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.