TrueCar is a marketplace and e-commerce site which provides new and used car buyers with pricing and information related to the car buying experience. In the second quarter of 2021, the company recorded *** million average monthly unique visitors to its site, the most of any quarter listed. Since then, quarterly website traffic has been declining, reaching *** million unique visitors in the most recent quarter.

In July 2025, totalwine.com was the most visited alcohol e-commerce website worldwide, with an average of ****million visits. Vivino.com ranked in second place, garnering approximately **** million monthly visitors globally.

General data recollected for the studio " Analysis of the Quantitative Impact of Social Networks on Web Traffic of Cybermedia in the 27 Countries of the European Union". Four research questions are posed: what percentage of the total web traffic generated by cybermedia in the European Union comes from social networks? Is said percentage higher or lower than that provided through direct traffic and through the use of search engines via SEO positioning? Which social networks have a greater impact? And is there any degree of relationship between the specific weight of social networks in the web traffic of a cybermedia and circumstances such as the average duration of the user's visit, the number of page views or the bounce rate understood in its formal aspect of not performing any kind of interaction on the visited page beyond reading its content? To answer these questions, we have first proceeded to a selection of the cybermedia with the highest web traffic of the 27 countries that are currently part of the European Union after the United Kingdom left on December 31, 2020. In each nation we have selected five media using a combination of the global web traffic metrics provided by the tools Alexa (https://www.alexa.com/), which ceased to be operational on May 1, 2022, and SimilarWeb (https:// www.similarweb.com/). We have not used local metrics by country since the results obtained with these first two tools were sufficiently significant and our objective is not to establish a ranking of cybermedia by nation but to examine the relevance of social networks in their web traffic. In all cases, cybermedia whose property corresponds to a journalistic company have been selected, ruling out those belonging to telecommunications portals or service providers; in some cases they correspond to classic information companies (both newspapers and televisions) while in others they refer to digital natives, without this circumstance affecting the nature of the research proposed.
Below we have proceeded to examine the web traffic data of said cybermedia. The period corresponding to the months of October, November and December 2021 and January, February and March 2022 has been selected. We believe that this six-month stretch allows possible one-time variations to be overcome for a month, reinforcing the precision of the data obtained. To secure this data, we have used the SimilarWeb tool, currently the most precise tool that exists when examining the web traffic of a portal, although it is limited to that coming from desktops and laptops, without taking into account those that come from mobile devices, currently impossible to determine with existing measurement tools on the market. It includes:

Web traffic general data: average visit duration, pages per visit and bounce rate Web traffic origin by country Percentage of traffic generated from social media over total web traffic Distribution of web traffic generated from social networks Comparison of web traffic generated from social netwoks with direct and search procedures

Context

The Google Merchandise Store sells Google branded merchandise. The data is typical of what you would see for an ecommerce website.

Content

The sample dataset contains Google Analytics 360 data from the Google Merchandise Store, a real ecommerce store. The Google Merchandise Store sells Google branded merchandise. The data is typical of what you would see for an ecommerce website. It includes the following kinds of information:

Traffic source data: information about where website visitors originate. This includes data about organic traffic, paid search traffic, display traffic, etc. Content data: information about the behavior of users on the site. This includes the URLs of pages that visitors look at, how they interact with content, etc. Transactional data: information about the transactions that occur on the Google Merchandise Store website.

Fork this kernel to get started.

Acknowledgements

Data from: https://bigquery.cloud.google.com/table/bigquery-public-data:google_analytics_sample.ga_sessions_20170801

Banner Photo by Edho Pratama from Unsplash.

Inspiration

What is the total number of transactions generated per device browser in July 2017?

The real bounce rate is defined as the percentage of visits with a single pageview. What was the real bounce rate per traffic source?

What was the average number of product pageviews for users who made a purchase in July 2017?

What was the average number of product pageviews for users who did not make a purchase in July 2017?

What was the average total transactions per user that made a purchase in July 2017?

What is the average amount of money spent per session in July 2017?

What is the sequence of pages viewed?

In April 2025, over ** million unique global visitors visited groupon.com. The average time spent on the website was two minutes and ** seconds.

Average Annual Daily Traffic data for use with GIS mapping software, databases, and web applications are from Caliper Corporation and contain data on the total volume of vehicle traffic on a highway or road for a year divided by 365 days.

Google.com recorded an average monthly traffic of **** billion visits in Japan from September to November 2024, which made it the most visited website. It was followed by Yahoo.co.jp and Youtube.com.

Below you’ll find a month by month breakdown of traffic on the australia.gov.au website along the following lines: Pageviews Visits Pages per visit Average time on page Devices This data is generated …Show full descriptionBelow you’ll find a month by month breakdown of traffic on the australia.gov.au website along the following lines: Pageviews Visits Pages per visit Average time on page Devices This data is generated using Google analytics. Please Note: This is an initial version of the data only. We’re looking forward to hearing your feedback on what other metrics are of interest to you. Please let us know by sending an email to data@digital.gov.au.

amazon.com.au generated one of the highest web traffics across popular online marketplace websites in Australia in February 2025 at around ** million site visits, with users of the online marketplace website viewing an average of **** pages per visit in February 2025. While catch.com.au had a lower overall web traffic, it scored a higher page engagement rate, with an average of **** pages per visit. Nonetheless, higher page visits in a single session does not necessarily equate to greater overall engagement, as more pages may have been viewed due to user difficulties in navigating web layouts and finding products.

Difference uses Google Analytics as the Baseline. Results based on Paired t-Test for Hypotheses Supported.

Annual average daily traffic is the total volume for the year divided by 365 days. The traffic count year is from October 1st through September 30th. Very few locations in California are actually counted continuously. Traffic Counting is generally performed by electronic counting instruments moved from location throughout the State in a program of continuous traffic count sampling. The resulting counts are adjusted to an estimate of annual average daily traffic by compensating for seasonal influence, weekly variation and other variables which may be present. Annual ADT is necessary for presenting a statewide picture of traffic flow, evaluating traffic trends, computing accident rates. planning and designing highways and other purposes.Traffic Census Program Page

Comprehensive analysis of Amazon's daily website traffic including visitor counts, traffic sources, mobile vs desktop usage, and seasonal patterns based on May 2025 data.

This traffic-count data is provided by the City of Pittsburgh's Department of Mobility & Infrastructure (DOMI). Counters were deployed as part of traffic studies, including intersection studies, and studies covering where or whether to install speed humps. In some cases, data may have been collected by the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission (SPC) or BikePGH.

Data is currently available for only the most-recent count at each location.

Traffic count data is important to the process for deciding where to install speed humps. According to DOMI, they may only be legally installed on streets where traffic counts fall below a minimum threshhold. Residents can request an evaluation of their street as part of DOMI's Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program. The City has also shared data on the impact of the Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program in reducing speeds.

Different studies may collect different data. Speed hump studies capture counts and speeds. SPC and BikePGH conduct counts of cyclists. Intersection studies included in this dataset may not include traffic counts, but reports of individual studies may be requested from the City. Despite the lack of count data, intersection studies are included to facilitate data requests.

Data captured by different types of counting devices are included in this data. StatTrak counters are in use by the City, and capture data on counts and speeds. More information about these devices may be found on the company's website. Data includes traffic counts and average speeds, and may also include separate counts of bicycles.

Tubes are deployed by both SPC and BikePGH and used to count cyclists. SPC may also deploy video counters to collect data.

NOTE: The data in this dataset has not updated since 2021 because of a broken data feed. We're working to fix it.

Host country of organization for 86 websites in study.

The census count of vehicles on city streets is normally reported in the form of Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts. These counts provide a good estimate for the actual number of vehicles on an average weekday at select street segments. Specific block segments are selected for a count because they are deemed as representative of a larger segment on the same roadway. ADT counts are used by transportation engineers, economists, real estate agents, planners, and others professionals for planning and operational analysis. The frequency for each count varies depending on City staff’s needs for analysis in any given area. This report covers the counts taken in our City during the past 12 years approximately.

Website type for the 86 websites in study.

Each point holds the measured average daily traffic volume for that site during the most recent survey. The site type attribute defines whether a classifier was used for the traffic count.Historical count data is available on the ADT website located at https://apps.co.marion.or.us/adt/

AADT represents current (most recent) Annual Average Daily Traffic on sampled road systems. This information is displayed using the Traffic Count Locations Active feature class as of the annual HPMS freeze in January. Historical AADT is found in another table. Please note that updates to this dataset are on an annual basis, therefore the data may not match ground conditions or may not be available for new roadways. Resource Contact: Christy Prentice, Traffic Forecasting & Analysis (TFA), http://www.dot.state.mn.us/tda/contacts.html#TFA

Check other metadata records in this package for more information on Annual Average Daily Traffic Locations Information.


Link to ESRI Feature Service:

Annual Average Daily Traffic Locations in Minnesota: Annual Average Daily Traffic Locations

Google.com, youtube.com, and facebook.com were the most visited websites in Ukraine in December 2021. Furthermore, Google's website on the Ukrainian domain, google.com.ua, ranked in the top 10 during that time.

The Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) for sections of roads for all vehicle types, including single and combination trucks, reported in the 2023 Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) federal report.Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) is used to represent vehicle traffic on a typical day of the year and is important for planning purposes, such as defining the federal functional classification of a roadway. The values are calculated using data collected from traffic counter devices, such as Automatic Traffic Recorders (ATR), Weigh In Motion (WIM) devices, and short term counters using tubes. All available traffic data collected throughout the year are then summed and divided by 365 to calculate the annual average daily traffic.Single unit trucks are any trucks that meets the requirements established for the FHWA Truck Classification Method for Categories 4 through 7. Combination unit trucks are any trucks that meets the requirements established for the FHWA Truck Classification Method for Categories 8 through 13. Refer to the Federal Highway Administration website for more information about truck classifications.Reported Extent: State Highway System (i.e. all ADOT-owned roads), National Highway System (NHS), and all federal aid-eligible roads. Federal aid-eligible roads include urban roads classified as minor collectors or above (functional system 1-6) and rural roads classified as major collectors or above (function system 1-5). Roads where ATRs are available, counts are updated annually. For roads where short term counters must be used, traffic counts are collected every three years for all National Highway System (NHS) roads as well as interstates (functional system 1), principal arterials (functional systems 2-3), and sample panel sections. All other federal aid-eligible roads, including minor arterials and collectors, are collected every six years.For undivided highways, which do not have a physical barrier between the two directions of traffic, values are reported as the sum total for both directions of travel. On divided highways, AADT is reported separately on the cardinal and non-cardinal directions of the roadway. Note, the cardinal direction refers to the direction of increasing mileposts.