About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Barrow County population by age cohorts (Children: Under 18 years; Working population: 18-64 years; Senior population: 65 years or more). It lists the population in each age cohort group along with its percentage relative to the total population of Barrow County. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution across children, working population and senior population for dependency ratio, housing requirements, ageing, migration patterns etc.

Key observations

The largest age group was 18 to 64 years with a poulation of 53,745 (61.79% of the total population). Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Age cohorts:

• Under 18 years
• 18 to 64 years
• 65 years and over

Variables / Data Columns

• Age Group: This column displays the age cohort for the Barrow County population analysis. Total expected values are 3 groups ( Children, Working Population and Senior Population).
• Population: The population for the age cohort in Barrow County is shown in the following column.
• Percent of Total Population: The population as a percent of total population of the Barrow County is shown in the following column.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Barrow County Population by Age. You can refer the same here

Population Estimate, Total, Not Hispanic or Latino, American Indian and Alaska Native Alone (5-year estimate) in Barrow County, GA was 46.00000 Persons in January of 2023, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, Population Estimate, Total, Not Hispanic or Latino, American Indian and Alaska Native Alone (5-year estimate) in Barrow County, GA reached a record high of 136.00000 in January of 2020 and a record low of 40.00000 in January of 2011. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Population Estimate, Total, Not Hispanic or Latino, American Indian and Alaska Native Alone (5-year estimate) in Barrow County, GA - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on March of 2025.

Graph and download economic data for Population Estimate, Total, Hispanic or Latino, White Alone (5-year estimate) in Barrow County, GA (B03002013E013013) from 2009 to 2023 about Barrow County, GA; Atlanta; GA; white; latino; hispanic; estimate; persons; 5-year; population; and USA.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the population of Barrow County by gender across 18 age groups. It lists the male and female population in each age group along with the gender ratio for Barrow County. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution of Barrow County by gender and age. For example, using this dataset, we can identify the largest age group for both Men and Women in Barrow County. Additionally, it can be used to see how the gender ratio changes from birth to senior most age group and male to female ratio across each age group for Barrow County.

Key observations

Largest age group (population): Male # 40-44 years (3,463) | Female # 10-14 years (3,386). Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Age groups:

• Under 5 years
• 5 to 9 years
• 10 to 14 years
• 15 to 19 years
• 20 to 24 years
• 25 to 29 years
• 30 to 34 years
• 35 to 39 years
• 40 to 44 years
• 45 to 49 years
• 50 to 54 years
• 55 to 59 years
• 60 to 64 years
• 65 to 69 years
• 70 to 74 years
• 75 to 79 years
• 80 to 84 years
• 85 years and over

Scope of gender :

Please note that American Community Survey asks a question about the respondents current sex, but not about gender, sexual orientation, or sex at birth. The question is intended to capture data for biological sex, not gender. Respondents are supposed to respond with the answer as either of Male or Female. Our research and this dataset mirrors the data reported as Male and Female for gender distribution analysis.

Variables / Data Columns

• Age Group: This column displays the age group for the Barrow County population analysis. Total expected values are 18 and are define above in the age groups section.
• Population (Male): The male population in the Barrow County is shown in the following column.
• Population (Female): The female population in the Barrow County is shown in the following column.
• Gender Ratio: Also known as the sex ratio, this column displays the number of males per 100 females in Barrow County for each age group.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Barrow County Population by Gender. You can refer the same here

Population Estimate, Total, Hispanic or Latino (5-year estimate) in Barrow County, GA was 12347.00000 Persons in January of 2023, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, Population Estimate, Total, Hispanic or Latino (5-year estimate) in Barrow County, GA reached a record high of 12347.00000 in January of 2023 and a record low of 4768.00000 in January of 2009. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Population Estimate, Total, Hispanic or Latino (5-year estimate) in Barrow County, GA - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on March of 2025.

Resident Population in Barrow County, GA was 96.29400 Thous. of Persons in January of 2024, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, Resident Population in Barrow County, GA reached a record high of 96.29400 in January of 2024 and a record low of 16.85900 in January of 1970. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Resident Population in Barrow County, GA - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on March of 2025.

Interactive visualization of Barrow County facts and figures, including population, demographics, community involvement, economy, employment, education, housing, health, crime and transportation. Data sources include AARP, U.S. Census/ACS, ARC, BLS, Center for Neighborhood Technology and County Health Rankings.

In this study, researchers measured PA450 1A responses in Barrow’s goldeneye from oiled and unoiled area of PWS, eight to nine year after the spill, to assess potential continuing exposure of these sea duck species to Exxon-Valdez oil. Due to their occurrence in nearshore habitats and consumption of benthic invertebrate prey, Barrow’s goldeneyes are particularly susceptible to continued exposre to residual Exxon-Valdez oil and thus, are potentially vulnerable to subsequent physiological and population level effects. Continued oil exposure through 1997 was indicated by higher induction of cytochrome P450 1A in birds from oiled areas than unoiled.

We initiated a population survey of the pond turtle population in the Nature Observatory Pond at the J. H. Barrow Field Station, Hiram Township, Portage County, Ohio. We used PIT tags (AVID) to permanently mark turtles. We trap turtles using a combination of hoop-net traps (baited with sardines in oil) and basking traps. All turtles were measured (carapace and plastron length) and many were weighed. The vast majority of turtles were midland painted turtles, with several snapping turtles trapped. This is a long-term study.

Percent of Population Below the Poverty Level (5-year estimate) in Barrow County, GA was 10.20% in January of 2023, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, Percent of Population Below the Poverty Level (5-year estimate) in Barrow County, GA reached a record high of 15.20 in January of 2015 and a record low of 9.60 in January of 2022. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Percent of Population Below the Poverty Level (5-year estimate) in Barrow County, GA - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on March of 2025.

Barrow’s Goldeneye (Bucephala islandica) is a relatively rare species in the Canadian Atlantic Provinces. Small numbers of birds during moulting and staging periods consistently occur in all four provinces. The Eastern population of Barrow's Goldeneye in North America was assessed in 2000 by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) as a species of special concern and was listed as such in Schedule 1 of the Species at Risk Act (SARA) in 2003. The range limits of the eastern population of Barrow’s Goldeneye are still unknown. Small numbers of this population winter in eastern North America, approximately 400 in the Atlantic Provinces and Maine. Based on this information, the wintering population of Barrow's Goldeneye in eastern Northern America is estimated at about 4500 individuals or 1400 pairs (30% of birds are adult females). Specific population trends are unknown but it is believed that the eastern population of the species declined during the 20th Century and that it may still be declining. These almost entirely ground-based surveys and incidental records were designed to track occurrences of Barrow's Goldeneye and identify important migration, staging and wintering areas in Atlantic Canada. Due to its relative smaller population, the eastern population of Barrow’s Goldeneye is more vulnerable to hunting, both intentional and unintentional, when compared to its western counterpart. The number of birds harvested each fall is low but the small continuous harvest could have significant impact on this population. Incompatible forest exploitation practices constitute threats to the species’ breeding habitats. These include the destruction of nests, reduction of the number of potential nesting sites and exposure of young to increased predation and disturbance. During non-breeding, chronic and catastrophic oil spills constitute potential threats to the Barrow’s Goldeneye in coastal areas, especially along the St. Lawrence migration corridor in late fall, winter and early spring. Sediment contamination at wintering areas (and contamination of prey base) may also affect the health of birds along the corridor. Barrow’s Goldeneye has a similar world-wide distribution to Harlequin Duck, suggesting that both species may have shared glaciation refugia, providing an ongoing example of speciation. Eastern Populations are isolated from western ones and also likely isolated from the Icelandic population. The eastern population of Barrow’s Goldeneye is thus important from a conservation point of view since it probably diverges genetically from other populations; and the long-term conservation of species likely depends upon the protection of genetically distinct population (Lesica and Allendorf, 1995). This dataset represents a compilation of surveys across the Atlantic Region between 1981 and 2010. Surveys were conducted as point counts from fixed locations, and Barrow's Goldeneye along with other species of waterfowl were recorded at each location.

Aerial photographic surveys for bowhead whales were conducted near Point Barrow, Alaska, from 19 April to 6 June in 2011. Approximately 4,594 photographs containing 6,801 bowhead whale images were obtained (not accounting for resightings). The 2011 field season was very successful: we flew 36 out of 49 available days and conducted 49 flights in that time; we were grounded due to weather on 13 days. The longest period of time that we were grounded due to weather (low ceilings/fog) was three days. This occurred after the migration had slowed down, during a time when few whales passed the ice perches according to the ice-based visual survey. The 2011 migration was steady with several peaks (30 April, 4-5 May, 12 May), and then the migration rate slowed down considerably after 14 May. The photographs taken in 2011 are a significant contribution to the bowhead whale photographic catalogue. They will be used to calculate a population estimate that may be used for comparison with the 2011 ice-based estimate and will provide better precision in estimates of bowhead whale life-history parameters.

Bowhead whales were documented during their spring migration most years from 1979 to 1992 by biologists from NMML. This documentation consisted of flying aerial surveys in an area generally north and east of Barrow, Alaska, (avoiding whaling operations to the west) to record sighting information and conduct vertical photography of the whales. Flight lines were sometimes on systematic transects perpendicular to the nearshore ice edge, providing an offshore distribution of whales (used in calculating the proportion of the population within sighting range of ice-base observation teams). Often, the flight lines were not prescribed, following instead the openings in sea ice (leads) to maximize opportunities for finding whales. These latter surveys were designed primarily for aerial photography, which provides information on individual, recognizable whales and, through photogrammetry, provides lengths of whales.

About this dataset

Context

This list ranks the 10 cities in the Barrow County, GA by Asian population, as estimated by the United States Census Bureau. It also highlights population changes in each cities over the past five years.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, including:

• 2019-2023 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2018-2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2017-2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2016-2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
• 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Variables / Data Columns

• Rank by Asian Population: This column displays the rank of cities in the Barrow County, GA by their Asian population, using the most recent ACS data available.
• cities: The cities for which the rank is shown in the previous column.
• Asian Population: The Asian population of the cities is shown in this column.
• % of Total cities Population: This shows what percentage of the total cities population identifies as Asian. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• % of Total Barrow County Asian Population: This tells us how much of the entire Barrow County, GA Asian population lives in that cities. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
• 5 Year Rank Trend: TThis column displays the rank trend across the last 5 years.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Overall, there is no significant difference between the numbers of men and women. people. The 10 to 14 years old age cohort exhibits the largest discrepancy with a difference of 120 people between the sexes. Furthermore, majority of the population is between the ages 0 to 4 years old, comprising 10.87 per cent of the population. Meanwhile, 63.65 per cent are part of its working-age population, or those between the ages 15 to 64 years old, while 30.93 per cent make up the younger population that will also be part of the labour force in two decades or less. At the present, 234 people are expected to retire in the coming years.

Field data on shorebird ecology and environmental conditions were collected from 2003-2018 at Utqiaġvik (formerly Barrow), Alaska. We collected long-term breeding data on all shorebird species residing at our study site in order to (1) estimate temporal and spatial variability of shorebird diversity and abundance, (2) estimate nest initiation date and nesting effort of Arctic-breeding shorebirds as measured by replacement clutch laying, and clutch and egg size, (3) estimate nest and chick survival, and other demographic traits, (4) establish a marked population of as many shorebird species as possible to estimate adult survival, mate and site fidelity, and natal philopatry, and (4) estimate environmental effects of weather, food availability, and predator and prey abundances on shorebird productivity and survival. Datasets include information pertaining to 1) live captures of adult shorebirds (Utiqiavik_adult_shorebird_banding), 2) live captures of shorebird chicks (Utiqiavik_chick_shorebird_banding), 3) monitoring of shorebird nests (Utiqiavik_nest_data), 4) measurements of shorebird eggs (Utiqiavik_egg_measurements), 5) resighting of color-banded shorebirds (Utiqiavik_shorebird_resightings), 6) surveys of seasonal snow cover and water availability (Utiqiavik_snow_water_surveys), 7) weekly point counts of potential shorebird predators (Utiqiavik_predator_surveys), 8) location of potential shorebird predator nests (Utiqiavik_predator_nests), 9) biomass of terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates (Utiqiavik_invertebrate_biomass), 10) sampling effort of terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates (Utiqiavik_invertebrate_sampling_effort), 11) daily counts of all vertebrate species encountered while in the field (Utiqiavik_daily_species_counts), and 12) opportunistic breeding dates of all vertebrate species encountered while in the field (Utiqiavik_breeding_dates). The data providers have invested considerable effort in QA/QC (quality assurance/ quality control), but it is possible that undetected errors remain. It is strongly recommended that careful attention be paid to the contents of the metadata file associated with these data to evaluate data set limitations, restrictions, or intended use. The originators of this dataset shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein. Potential users of these data should first contact the data authors listed below, as potential biases may occur within the data depending on the intended use. For example, fox control was conducted within the area for a number of years, potentially reducing predation pressure in some years. Additionally, one plot (brw6) was located within the boundaries of a landfill fence, potentially biasing metrics within this plot as compared to the population. Therefore, potential users should contact the data authors to discuss intended use and how these data may or may not be applicable. General field methods are available in the ASDN_protocol_2014.pdf file. However, data authors should be contacted for annual protocol documents that detail specific annual methodologies.

This dataset is intended for researchers, students, and policy makers for reference and mapping purposes, and may be used for basic applications such as viewing, querying, and map output production, or to provide a basemap to support graphical overlays and analysis with other spatial data.

Barrow’s Goldeneyes (Bucephala islandica) winter almost exclusively in coastal marine areas (Bellrose 1980), where they feed primarily on blue mussels (Mytilus trossulus) (Koehl et al. 1982, Vermeer 1982, D. Esler, unpubl. data). Although distributions of Barrow’s Goldeneyes have been described in relation to habitat and food resources during the breeding season (e.g., Einarsson 1988, 1990), factors related to winter densities have rarely been addressed (VermeerIn this study we evaluated Barrow’s Goldeneye densities in relation to a suite of physical habitat characteristics and blue mussel biomass to document environmental attributes important to wintering populations of this sea duck. We also assessed the effect of history of contamination from the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill, in which nearly 42 million liters of oil were leaked into Prince William Sound, Alaska. Immediate and direct mortality of birds following the oil spill was high and, within Prince William Sound, nearly a quarter of recovered carcasses were sea ducks

We survey the snakes of the J. H. Barrow Field Station, Hiram Township, Portage County, Ohio. We use coverboards as a survey method. Each coverboard array consists of 10, 1 by 1 m pieces of exterior grade plywood (starting in 2000) and 5 sheets of corrugated steel (starting in 2003). We presently have five arrays set out in old field sites (intially two arrays set out in forested areas yielded no snakes). At intervals throughout the warmer months we examine each of the arrays. At each survey we capture all snakes by hand, determine species, measure the snout-vent length, assess condition (e.g. gravid, shed phase) and mark the larger individuals using PIT tags (AVID).

Net tow information.