Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset tracks annual overall school rank from 2010 to 2017 for University Behavioral Center
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset provides counts and percentages of diagnoses broken down by each patient’s Healthy Places Index percentile ranking (based on ZIP code of residence). Healthcare encounters are categorized into four diagnosis groups: mental health disorders, substance use disorders, co-occurring disorders, and all other diagnoses. To view and interact with a fully functioning version of the HPI map and data used in these HCAI analyses of behavioral health, please click the link to visit https://map.healthyplacesindex.org/.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset tracks annual overall school rank from 2010 to 2016 for Southwest Behavior J/shs
Social network structures can crucially impact complex social processes such as collective behaviour or the transmission of information and diseases. However, currently it is poorly understood how social networks change over time. Previous studies on primates suggest that ‘knockouts’ (due to death or dispersal) of high-ranking individuals might be important drivers for structural changes in animal social networks. Here we test this hypothesis using long-term data on a natural population of baboons, examining the effects of 29 natural knockouts of alpha or beta males on adult female social networks. We investigated whether and how knockouts affected (1) changes in grooming and association rates among adult females, and (2) changes in mean degree and global clustering coefficient in these networks. The only significant effect that we found was a decrease in mean degree in grooming networks in the first month after knockouts, but this decrease was rather small, and grooming networks reboun...
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The data presented describe training and testing of chicks on a transitive inference task. The Excel table shows the rank (1-3), sex (1=male; 2 =female) and outcomes (number of trials to criterion of 20 correct choices - a correct choice at training being rewarded with a food item for pecking the 'higher' rank .i.e A over B, B over C etc. Testing is of non-rewarded pairs AE and BD, previously not seen before). To note chicks were held in groups of 3 or 4 individuals and ranked at Day 5 of life when first grouped together.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Cognition data used for analyses presented in the manuscript: "Dominance and social information use in a lizard""male.id" = Identification number of a lizard"dom" = Two level factor indicating dominance status of lizard. Dominant = 1, subordinate = 0"treatment" = Two level factor indicating which treatment group lizard is in. 1 = social, control = 0"status" = Character variable indicating dominance status and treatment group of lizard. DS = dominant social, DC = dominant control, SS = subordinate social, SC = subordinate control"svl" = Snout-vent-length of a lizard in millimeters"mass" = Mass of a lizard in grams"sc.svl" = Z-transformed snout-vent-length of a lizard"sc.mass" = Z-transformed mass of a lizard "task" = Two level factor indicating task given to lizard. 1 = association task, 0 = reversal"trial" = Number of the trial a lizard received a task"correct" = Two level factor indicating whether lizard made a correct choice or not. 1 = correct , 0 = incorrect"blue.lat" = Latency in seconds of a lizard displacing the dish covered by a blue lid"white.lat" = Latency in seconds of a lizard displacing the dish covered by a white lid"correct.choice.only" = Two level factor indicating whether lizard only displaced the lid from the correct dish or not. 1 = correct dish only, 0 = both dish"lt" = Two level factor indicating when lizard reached the learning criterion on each trial. 1 = has not reached criterion , 0 = reached criterion"learnt" = Two level factor indicating whether lizard reached criterion and therefore learnt the task. 1 = learnt , 0 = did not learn
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset tracks annual overall school rank from 2010 to 2022 for Palmshores Behavior Health Center
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Honeybees forage on diverse flowers which vary in the amount and type of rewards they offer, and bees are challenged with maximizing the resources they gather for their colony. That bees are effective foragers is clear, but how bees solve this type of complex multi-choice task is unknown. Here, we set bees a five-comparison choice task in which five colours differed in their probability of offering reward and punishment. The colours were ranked such that high ranked colours were more likely to offer reward, and the ranking was unambiguous. Bees’ choices in unrewarded tests matched their individual experiences of reward and punishment of each colour, indicating bees solved this test not by comparing or ranking colours but by basing their colour choices on their history of reinforcement for each colour. Computational modelling suggests a structure like the honeybee mushroom body with reinforcement-related plasticity at both input and output can be sufficient for this cognitive strategy.We discuss how probability matching enables effective choices to be made without a need to compare any stimuli directly, and the use and limitations of this simple cognitive strategy for foraging animals.
European journal of research methods for the behavioral and social sciences Impact Factor 2024-2025 - ResearchHelpDesk - Methodology is the successor of the two journals Metodologia de las Ciencias del Comportamiento and Methods of Psychological Research-Online (MPR-Online). Methodology is the official organ of the European Association of Methodology (EAM), a union of methodologists working in different areas of the social and behavioral sciences (e.g., psychology, sociology, economics, educational and political sciences). The journal provides a platform for interdisciplinary exchange of methodological research and applications in the different fields, including new methodological approaches, review articles, software information, and instructional papers that can be used in teaching. Three main disciplines are covered: data analysis, research methodology, and psychometrics. The articles published in the journal are not only accessible to methodologists but also to more applied researchers in the various disciplines. Abstract & indexing Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences (CC/S&BS) (since 2009), PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, ERIH and Scopus.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Direct Behavior Rating (DBR) as a behavioral progress monitoring tool can be designed as longitudinal assessment with only short intervals between measurement points. The reliability of these instruments has been evaluated mostly in observational studies with small samples based on generalizability theory. However, for standardized use in the pedagogical field, a larger and broader sample is required in order to assess measurement invariance between different participant groups and over time. Therefore, we constructed a DBR with multiple items to measure the occurrence of specific externalizing and internalizing student classroom behaviors on a Likert scale (1 = never to 7 = always). In a pilot study, two trained raters observed 16 primary school students and rated the student behavior over all items with a satisfactory reliability. In the main study, 108 regular primary school students, 97 regular secondary school students and 14 students in a clinical setting were rated daily over one week (five measurement points). IRT analyses confirmed the instrument’s technical adequacy, and latent growth models demonstrated the instrument’s stability over time. Further development of the instrument and study designs to implement DBRs are discussed.
The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. One such measure was the Child and Adolescent Behavior Rating Scale. It obtained an interviewer rating of the behavior of all subjects in Cohorts 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15. It recorded the amount of time the interviewer spent observing the subject and whether this observation took place only during the interview with the subject or during the interview and at other times. The subject was also rated on various behaviors.
Knowledge of the genetic and environmental influences on a character is pivotal for understanding evolutionary changes in quantitative traits in natural populations. Dominance and aggression are ubiquitous traits that are selectively advantageous in many animal societies and have the potential to impact the evolutionary trajectory of animal populations. Here we provide age- and sex-specific estimates of additive genetic and environmental components of variance for dominance rank and aggression rate in a free-living, human-habituated bird population subject to natural selection. We use a long-term data set on individually marked greylag geese (Anser anser) and show that phenotypic variation in dominance-related behaviours contains significant additive genetic variance, parental effects and permanent environment effects. The relative importance of these variance components varied between age and sex classes, whereby the most pronounced differences concerned non-genetic components. In part...
It is unclear how habitat features alter animal response to social instability. Only by uncovering such interactions can we fully understand the evolutionary drivers and fitness consequences of sociality. We capitalize on a management-induced manipulation of social stability in an island population of free-ranging feral horses (Equus caballus), living across three distinct habitat types. We tested whether female group-changing behaviour (a reliable measure of social instability) affected 1) female-female aggression, 2) rank within female dominance hierarchies, 3) stability of female hierarchies (in the groups they joined and/or left), and 4) how habitat characteristics shaped these responses. Female group-changing behaviour positively predicted aggression from other females, but only when habitat features such as visibility and freshwater distribution were considered. We found no strong association among female group changing behaviour and the aggression initiated, female rank, or the s..., Behavioural and demographic sampling Comparable to previous studies, data were collected across 7.5 weeks in 2021 (June – July) and 8 weeks in 2023 (June – August), totaling 697.15 hours of behavioural observation (379.9 hours, 2021; 317.25 hours, 2023), averaging 4.72 ± 0.61 hours per mare (range = 0.5-14.25 hours). We recorded all instances of female-female aggression including displacements, bites, kicks, and pushes [25]. Each female’s aggression rate was calculated as the total number of aggressive interactions (either initiated or received) / the total number of hours she was observed. Only reproductive mares (aged 4 years and older) for which we collected at least three hours of data were included in our analyses (n = 51). When possible, animals were observed during both years of the study; two main factors precluded this for some animals: 1) field logistics (finding and then observing animals on foot) required that only mares that could be located on a consistent basis were obser..., , # The effects of female group-changing behavior on female-femaleaggression, female rank, and female hierarchy stability
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.vhhmgqp3z
Description:Â R code for analysis regarding the effects of female group-changing behavior on female dominance hierarchy stability
Description:Â R code for analysis regarding the effects of female group-changing behavior on female-female aggression and female rank
Description:Â Data for analyzing the effects of female group-changing behavior on female-female aggression and female rank
https://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html
Social animals have evolved a range of signals to avoid aggressive and facilitate affiliative interactions. Vocal behaviour is especially important in this respect with many species, including various primates, producing acoustically distinct ‘greeting calls’ when two individuals approach each other. While the ultimate function of greeting calls has been explored in several species, little effort has been made to understand the mechanisms of this behaviour across species. The aim of this study was to explore how differences in individual features (individual dominance rank), dyadic relationships (dominance distance and social bond strength), and audience composition (presence of high-ranking or strongly bonded individuals in proximity), determined vocal greeting production during approaches between two individuals in the philopatric sex of four primate species: female olive baboons (Papio anubis), male chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), female sooty mangabeys (Cercocebus atys), and female vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus). We found that female vervet monkeys did not produce greeting calls, while in the other three species, low-ranking individuals were more likely to call than high-ranking ones. The effects of dyadic dominance relationships differed in species-specific ways, with calling being positively associated with rank distance between two individuals in baboons and chimpanzees, but negatively in mangabeys. In none of the tested species did we find strong evidence for an effect of dyadic affiliative relationships or audience on call production. These results likely reflect deeper evolutionary layers of species-specific peculiarities in social style. We conclude that a comparative approach to investigate vocal behaviour has the potential to not only better understand the mechanisms mediating social signal production, but also to shed light on their evolutionary trajectories.
Competition within primate groups often translates to a social hierarchy, with high-rank individuals gaining privileged access to resources, especially food. Golden snub-nosed monkeys Rhinopithecus roxellana live in a multi-level society, with multiple one-male units (OMUs), each containing a single adult male and several females, forming a breeding-band. High-rank males have increased access to high-value foods and spend less time feeding and more time being groomed by females, potentially enhancing social cohesion within their OMUs. The adults of each OMU mainly feed and socialize together, with food competition predominantly acting at the OMU level. We thus predicted that adult females by association attain the rank and feeding privileges of their OMU leader males, and make similar time-budget trade-offs. By food-provisioning a wild breeding-band during winter and spring, when natural foods are abundant or limited, respectively, we found that females of high-rank OMUs ate more provis..., Field study of female-female competition in wild golden monkeys. The effects of seasonality and social rank were tested. Data are arranged in order to be analysed in R using mixed-models., , Spreadsheet column headings
**Â **
 Foodstack data sheet
**Â **
This spreadsheet is made up of values taken in spring and winter by recording the same group of monkeys. The values have also been split between two food types, provisioned and natural. This is to enable the comparison of food type and season. However, this results in data from the same individual females being included because measurements were taken from the same monkeys in spring and winter, and because they eat both provisioned and natural food on the same day. These data for the same monkeys have thus been ‘stacked’ on top of each other. This has been accounted for in our statistical analysis by using ‘individual’ as a random factor
**Â **
‘Day’ of data recording reflects the same ‘date’ in each dataset. ‘Rank’ is the OMU leader male rank at the time the data were recorded.
**Â **
Column headings and what they mean.
Â
Number – row number. To enhance data sorting and management.
Â
**Sea...
The data package provides county-level data and rankings for measures that define the population health status and for a set factors with great influence on population health. The measures used to establish counties ranks are related to length and quality of life and to health behavior, clinical care, socioeconomic and environmental factors.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The Development for Codes of Conduct in Online Classrooms of Vietnamese High School Students (CCOCVHSS) dataset includes 06 files with different formats (.doc, .cvs, .sav) to suit each step in the process of developing items of CCOCVHSS, specifically as follows: 1. Initial_Items_Pool.docx: presents 34 items developed by the research team based on the overview and analysis of research documents related to student behavior in the online learning environment in relation to teachers and other students with two main aspects: attitude and behavior, along with codes of conduct for students at general schools for online learning. 2. Experts_Judge_Results.xlsx: includes 07 columns and 35 rows, in which the columns correspond to data fields. Meanwhile, the rows show information about each item code, the content of that item, each expert's rating for that item, the total score of that item, and the analysis results of the proportions of the three rating levels. 3. Questionare_Of_CCOCVHSS.docx: is a questionnaire designed to serve the data collection with three parts: (1) Introduction and declaration of consent; (2) Demographic information; and (3) Questions. 4. CCOCVHSS _rawdata.csv: is the data used for analysis that has been cleaned from the raw data collected from the online survey.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset tracks annual overall school rank from 2010 to 2018 for Halifax Behavioral Services
This dataset tracks the updates made on the dataset "Mental and Behavioral Health Diagnoses in Emergency Department and Inpatient Discharges by Healthy Places Index Ranking" as a repository for previous versions of the data and metadata.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Model interpretations are displayed for all models using Elo ratings (similar results for David’s Scores). Downward arrows indicates that lower-ranking individuals show higher rates, upward arrows indicates that higher-ranking individuals show higher rates. Interactions can show Down The Hierarchy (DTH; Targeting lower-ranking individuals), Closely Ranked Receiver (CRR; Targeting individuals with similar rank); Up The Hierarchy (UTH; Targeting higher-ranking individuals), or a mix of those.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset tracks annual overall school rank from 2010 to 2017 for University Behavioral Center