Description: This dataset contains detailed information about videos from various YouTube channels that specialize in data science and analytics. It includes metrics such as views, likes, comments, and publication dates. The dataset consists of 22862 rows, providing a robust sample for analyzing trends in content engagement, popularity of topics over time, and comparison of channels' performance.

Column Descriptors:

Channel_Name: The name of the YouTube channel. Title: The title of the video. Published_date: The date when the video was published. Views: The number of views the video has received. Like_count: The number of likes the video has received. Comment_Count: The number of comments on the video.

This dataset contains information from the following YouTube channels:

['sentdex', 'freeCodeCamp.org' ,'CampusX', 'Darshil Parmar',' Keith Galli' ,'Alex The Analyst', 'Socratica' , Krish Naik', 'StatQuest with Josh Starmer', 'Nicholas Renotte', 'Leila Gharani', 'Rob Mulla' ,'Ryan Nolan Data', 'techTFQ', 'Dataquest' ,'WsCube Tech', 'Chandoo', 'Luke Barousse', 'Andrej Karpathy', 'Thu Vu data analytics', 'Guy in a Cube', 'Tableau Tim', 'codebasics', 'DeepLearningAI', 'Rishabh Mishra' 'ExcelIsFun', 'Kevin Stratvert' ' Ken Jee','Kaggle' , 'Tina Huang']

This dataset can be used for various analyses, including but not limited to:

Identifying the most popular videos and channels in the data science field.

Understanding viewer engagement trends over time.

Comparing the performance of different types of content across multiple channels.

Performing a comparison between different channels to find the best-performing ones.

Identifying the best videos to watch for specific topics in data science and analytics.

Conducting a detailed analysis of your favorite YouTube channel to understand its content strategy and performance.

Note: The data is current as of the date of extraction and may not reflect real-time changes on YouTube. For any analyses, ensure to consider the date when the data was last updated to maintain accuracy and relevance.

Looking for a free Walmart product dataset? The Walmart Products Free Dataset delivers a ready-to-use ecommerce product data CSV containing ~2,100 verified product records from Walmart.com. It includes vital details like product titles, prices, categories, brand info, availability, and descriptions — perfect for data analysis, price comparison, market research, or building machine-learning models.

Key Features

Complete Product Metadata: Each entry includes URL, title, brand, SKU, price, currency, description, availability, delivery method, average rating, total ratings, image links, unique ID, and timestamp.

CSV Format, Ready to Use: Download instantly - no need for scraping, cleaning or formatting.

Good for E-commerce Research & ML: Ideal for product cataloging, price tracking, demand forecasting, recommendation systems, or data-driven projects.

Free & Easy Access: Priced at USD $0.0, making it a great starting point for developers, data analysts or students.

Who Benefits?

• Data analysts & researchers exploring e-commerce trends or product catalog data.
• Developers & data scientists building price-comparison tools, recommendation engines or ML models.
• E-commerce strategists/marketers need product metadata for competitive analysis or market research.
• Students/hobbyists needing a free dataset for learning or demo projects.

Why Use This Dataset Instead of Manual Scraping?

• Time-saving: No need to write scrapers or deal with rate limits.
• Clean, structured data: All records are verified and already formatted in CSV, saving hours of cleaning.
• Risk-free: Avoid Terms-of-Service issues or IP blocks that come with manual scraping.
  Instant access: Free and immediately downloadable.

This project was done to analyze sales data: to identify trends, top-selling products, and revenue metrics for business decision-making. I did this project offered by MeriSKILL, to learn more and be exposed to real-world projects and challenges that will provide me with valuable industry experience and help me develop my data analytical skills.https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F20837845%2Fe3561db319392bf9cc8b7d3fcc7ed94d%2F2019%20Sales%20dashboard.png?generation=1717273572595587&alt=media" alt=""> More on this project is on Medium

The complete dataset used in the analysis comprises 36 samples, each described by 11 numeric features and 1 target. The attributes considered were caspase 3/7 activity, Mitotracker red CMXRos area and intensity (3 h and 24 h incubations with both compounds), Mitosox oxidation (3 h incubation with the referred compounds) and oxidation rate, DCFDA fluorescence (3 h and 24 h incubations with either compound) and oxidation rate, and DQ BSA hydrolysis. The target of each instance corresponds to one of the 9 possible classes (4 samples per class): Control, 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 µM for 6-OHDA and 0.03, 0.06, 0.125 and 0.25 µM for rotenone. The dataset is balanced, it does not contain any missing values and data was standardized across features. The small number of samples prevented a full and strong statistical analysis of the results. Nevertheless, it allowed the identification of relevant hidden patterns and trends.

Exploratory data analysis, information gain, hierarchical clustering, and supervised predictive modeling were performed using Orange Data Mining version 3.25.1 [41]. Hierarchical clustering was performed using the Euclidean distance metric and weighted linkage. Cluster maps were plotted to relate the features with higher mutual information (in rows) with instances (in columns), with the color of each cell representing the normalized level of a particular feature in a specific instance. The information is grouped both in rows and in columns by a two-way hierarchical clustering method using the Euclidean distances and average linkage. Stratified cross-validation was used to train the supervised decision tree. A set of preliminary empirical experiments were performed to choose the best parameters for each algorithm, and we verified that, within moderate variations, there were no significant changes in the outcome. The following settings were adopted for the decision tree algorithm: minimum number of samples in leaves: 2; minimum number of samples required to split an internal node: 5; stop splitting when majority reaches: 95%; criterion: gain ratio. The performance of the supervised model was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F-measure and area under the ROC curve (AUC) metrics.

This is a dataset downloaded off excelbianalytics.com created off of random VBA logic. I recently performed an extensive exploratory data analysis on it and I included new columns to it, namely: Unit margin, Order year, Order month, Order weekday and Order_Ship_Days which I think can help with analysis on the data. I shared it because I thought it was a great dataset to practice analytical processes on for newbies like myself.

The dataset has been collected in the frame of the Prac1 of the subject Tipology and Data Life Cycle of the Master's Degree in Data Science of the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC).

The dataset contains 25 variables and 52478 records corresponding to books on the GoodReads Best Books Ever list (the larges list on the site).

Original code used to retrieve the dataset can be found on github repository: github.com/scostap/goodreads_bbe_dataset

The data was retrieved in two sets, the first 30000 books and then the remainig 22478. Dates were not parsed and reformated on the second chunk so publishDate and firstPublishDate are representet in a mm/dd/yyyy format for the first 30000 records and Month Day Year for the rest.

Book cover images can be optionally downloaded from the url in the 'coverImg' field. Python code for doing so and an example can be found on the github repo.

The 25 fields of the dataset are:

| Attributes | Definition | Completeness |
| ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | 
| bookId | Book Identifier as in goodreads.com | 100 |
| title | Book title | 100 |
| series | Series Name | 45 |
| author | Book's Author | 100 |
| rating | Global goodreads rating | 100 |
| description | Book's description | 97 |
| language | Book's language | 93 |
| isbn | Book's ISBN | 92 |
| genres | Book's genres | 91 |
| characters | Main characters | 26 |
| bookFormat | Type of binding | 97 |
| edition | Type of edition (ex. Anniversary Edition) | 9 |
| pages | Number of pages | 96 |
| publisher | Editorial | 93 |
| publishDate | publication date | 98 |
| firstPublishDate | Publication date of first edition | 59 |
| awards | List of awards | 20 |
| numRatings | Number of total ratings | 100 |
| ratingsByStars | Number of ratings by stars | 97 |
| likedPercent | Derived field, percent of ratings over 2 starts (as in GoodReads) | 99 |
| setting | Story setting | 22 |
| coverImg | URL to cover image | 99 |
| bbeScore | Score in Best Books Ever list | 100 |
| bbeVotes | Number of votes in Best Books Ever list | 100 |
| price | Book's price (extracted from Iberlibro) | 73 |

Each R script replicates all of the example code from one chapter from the book. All required data for each script are also uploaded, as are all data used in the practice problems at the end of each chapter. The data are drawn from a wide array of sources, so please cite the original work if you ever use any of these data sets for research purposes.

Success.ai offers a cutting-edge solution for businesses and organizations seeking Company Financial Data on private and public companies. Our comprehensive database is meticulously crafted to provide verified profiles, including contact details for financial decision-makers such as CFOs, financial analysts, corporate treasurers, and other key stakeholders. This robust dataset is continuously updated and validated using AI technology to ensure accuracy and relevance, empowering businesses to make informed decisions and optimize their financial strategies.

Key Features of Success.ai's Company Financial Data:

Global Coverage: Access data from over 70 million businesses worldwide, including public and private companies across all major industries and regions. Our datasets span 250+ countries, offering extensive reach for your financial analysis and market research.

Detailed Financial Profiles: Gain insights into company financials, including revenue, profit margins, funding rounds, and operational costs. Profiles are enriched with key contact details, including work emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses, ensuring direct access to decision-makers.

Industry-Specific Data: Tailored datasets for sectors such as financial services, manufacturing, technology, healthcare, and energy, among others. Each dataset is customized to meet the unique needs of industry professionals and analysts.

Real-Time Accuracy: With continuous updates powered by AI-driven validation, our financial data maintains a 99% accuracy rate, ensuring you have access to the most reliable and up-to-date information available.

Compliance and Security: All data is collected and processed in strict adherence to global compliance standards, including GDPR, ensuring ethical and lawful usage.

Why Choose Success.ai for Company Financial Data?

Best Price Guarantee: We pride ourselves on offering the most competitive pricing in the industry, ensuring you receive unparalleled value for comprehensive financial data.

AI-Validated Accuracy: Our advanced AI algorithms meticulously verify every data point to ensure precision and reliability, helping you avoid costly errors in your financial decision-making.

Customized Data Solutions: Whether you need data for a specific region, industry, or type of business, we tailor our datasets to align perfectly with your requirements.

Scalable Data Access: From small startups to global enterprises, our platform caters to businesses of all sizes, delivering scalable solutions to suit your operational needs.

Comprehensive Use Cases for Financial Data:

1. Strategic Financial Planning:

Leverage our detailed financial profiles to create accurate budgets, forecasts, and strategic plans. Gain insights into competitors’ financial health and market positions to make data-driven decisions.

1. Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A):

Access key financial details and contact information to streamline your M&A processes. Identify potential acquisition targets or partners with verified profiles and financial data.

1. Investment Analysis:

Evaluate the financial performance of public and private companies for informed investment decisions. Use our data to identify growth opportunities and assess risk factors.

1. Lead Generation and Sales:

Enhance your sales outreach by targeting CFOs, financial analysts, and other decision-makers with verified contact details. Utilize accurate email and phone data to increase conversion rates.

1. Market Research:

Understand market trends and financial benchmarks with our industry-specific datasets. Use the data for competitive analysis, benchmarking, and identifying market gaps.

APIs to Power Your Financial Strategies:

Enrichment API: Integrate real-time updates into your systems with our Enrichment API. Keep your financial data accurate and current to drive dynamic decision-making and maintain a competitive edge.

Lead Generation API: Supercharge your lead generation efforts with access to verified contact details for key financial decision-makers. Perfect for personalized outreach and targeted campaigns.

Tailored Solutions for Industry Professionals:

Financial Services Firms: Gain detailed insights into revenue streams, funding rounds, and operational costs for competitor analysis and client acquisition.

Corporate Finance Teams: Enhance decision-making with precise data on industry trends and benchmarks.

Consulting Firms: Deliver informed recommendations to clients with access to detailed financial datasets and key stakeholder profiles.

Investment Firms: Identify potential investment opportunities with verified data on financial performance and market positioning.

What Sets Success.ai Apart?

Extensive Database: Access detailed financial data for 70M+ companies worldwide, including small businesses, startups, and large corporations.

Ethical Practices: Our data collection and processing methods are fully comp...

Context: Dataset is created to identify which channels on youtube have the best content related to data science and i have extracted the 36 channels data using youtube API ,where one can perform EDA and identify where they can find the best resources to start learning about data science

Description: - This dataset includes all 22 built-in datasets from the Seaborn library, a widely used Python data visualization tool. Seaborn's built-in datasets are essential resources for anyone interested in practicing data analysis, visualization, and machine learning. They span a wide range of topics, from classic datasets like the Iris flower classification to real-world data such as Titanic survival records and diamond characteristics.

• Included Datasets:
  • Anagrams: Analysis of word anagram patterns.
  • Anscombe: Anscombe's quartet demonstrating the importance of data visualization.
  • Attention: Data on attention span variations in different scenarios.
  • Brain Networks: Connectivity data within brain networks.
  • Car Crashes: US car crash statistics.
  • Diamonds: Data on diamond properties including price, cut, and clarity.
  • Dots: Randomly generated data for scatter plot visualization.
  • Dow Jones: Historical records of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
  • Exercise: The relationship between exercise and health metrics.
  • Flights: Monthly passenger numbers on flights.
  • FMRI: Functional MRI data capturing brain activity.
  • Geyser: Eruption times of the Old Faithful geyser.
  • Glue: Strength of glue under different conditions.
  • Health Expenditure: Health expenditure statistics across countries.
  • Iris: Famous dataset for classifying Iris species.
  • MPG: Miles per gallon for various vehicles.
  • Penguins: Data on penguin species and their features.
  • Planets: Characteristics of discovered exoplanets.
  • Sea Ice: Measurements of sea ice extent.
  • Taxis: Taxi trips data in a city.
  • Tips: Tipping data collected from a restaurant.
  • Titanic: Survival data from the Titanic disaster.

This complete collection serves as an excellent starting point for anyone looking to improve their data science skills, offering a wide array of datasets suitable for both beginners and advanced users.

Data science is a rapidly growing field in the tech industry, and LinkedIn is a popular platform for finding job opportunities in this domain.

This dataset provides valuable insights into data analyst job postings, including the required skills and software proficiency sought by employers.

If you find this dataset useful, don't forget to hit the upvote button! 😊💝

Checkout my top datasets

• Top Spotify Songs in 73 Countries
• Wages by Education in the USA
• Amazon Products Dataset (1.4M Products)
• TMDB 950K Movies
• Amazon Kindle Books (130K Books)

Interesting Task Ideas:

1. Analyze the most in-demand skills and software for data analyst positions.
2. Find common job titles in the data science field.
3. Explore the geographical distribution of data engineering job opportunities.
4. Identify the most sought-after skills

Photo by Lukas Blazek on Unsplash

File name definitions:

'...v_50_175_250_300...' - dataset for velocity ranges [50, 175] + [250, 300] m/s

'...v_175_250...' - dataset for velocity range [175, 250] m/s

'ANNdevelop...' - used to perform 9 parametric sub-analyses where, in each one, many ANNs are developed (trained, validated and tested) and the one yielding the best results is selected

'ANNtest...' - used to test the best ANN from each aforementioned parametric sub-analysis, aiming to find the best ANN model; this dataset includes the 'ANNdevelop...' counterpart

Where to find the input (independent) and target (dependent) variable values for each dataset/excel ?

input values in 'IN' sheet

target values in 'TARGET' sheet

Where to find the results from the best ANN model (for each target/output variable and each velocity range)?

open the corresponding excel file and the expected (target) vs ANN (output) results are written in 'TARGET vs OUTPUT' sheet

Check reference below (to be added when the paper is published)

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328849817_11_Neural_Networks_-_Max_Disp_-_Railway_Beams

Sample data for exercises in Further Adventures in Data Cleaning.

Introduction

This dataset is a synthetic e-commerce dataset designed to provide a comprehensive view of transaction, customer, product, and advertising data in a dynamic marketplace. It simulates real-world scenarios with seasonal effects, regional variations, advertising metrics, and customer purchasing behaviors. This dataset can serve as a valuable resource for exploring e-commerce analytics, customer segmentation, product performance, and marketing effectiveness.

The dataset includes detailed transaction-level data featuring product categories, customer demographics, discounts, revenue, and advertising metrics such as impressions, clicks, conversion rates, and ad spend. Seasonal trends and regional multipliers are integrated into the data to create realistic patterns that mimic consumer behavior across different times of the year and geographic regions.

Potential Analyses

1. Customer Insights

• Perform customer segmentation based on demographics, lifetime value, and purchase behavior.
• Analyze trends in customer behavior across regions or product categories.

2. Product Performance

• Identify top-performing products by revenue or units sold.
• Evaluate the impact of discounts and promotions on product sales.

3. Marketing Analytics

• Measure the effectiveness of advertising using CTR, CPC, and conversion rates.
• Assess how ad spend correlates with revenue and impressions.

4. Seasonal Trends

• Analyze seasonality effects on sales volume and revenue.
• Explore spikes in revenue or sales during holiday periods.

5. Regional Analysis

• Investigate regional performance trends using the regional multipliers.
• Examine customer preferences across different regions.

6. Data Science Applications

• Build predictive models for sales forecasting.
• Create clustering models for customer segmentation or product categorization.
• Develop optimization strategies for advertising spend or inventory management.

This dataset provides ample opportunities for data exploration, machine learning, and business analysis. We hope you find it insightful and useful for your projects!

United States agricultural researchers have many options for making their data available online. This dataset aggregates the primary sources of ag-related data and determines where researchers are likely to deposit their agricultural data. These data serve as both a current landscape analysis and also as a baseline for future studies of ag research data. Purpose As sources of agricultural data become more numerous and disparate, and collaboration and open data become more expected if not required, this research provides a landscape inventory of online sources of open agricultural data. An inventory of current agricultural data sharing options will help assess how the Ag Data Commons, a platform for USDA-funded data cataloging and publication, can best support data-intensive and multi-disciplinary research. It will also help agricultural librarians assist their researchers in data management and publication. The goals of this study were to establish where agricultural researchers in the United States-- land grant and USDA researchers, primarily ARS, NRCS, USFS and other agencies -- currently publish their data, including general research data repositories, domain-specific databases, and the top journals compare how much data is in institutional vs. domain-specific vs. federal platforms determine which repositories are recommended by top journals that require or recommend the publication of supporting data ascertain where researchers not affiliated with funding or initiatives possessing a designated open data repository can publish data Approach The National Agricultural Library team focused on Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), and United States Forest Service (USFS) style research data, rather than ag economics, statistics, and social sciences data. To find domain-specific, general, institutional, and federal agency repositories and databases that are open to US research submissions and have some amount of ag data, resources including re3data, libguides, and ARS lists were analysed. Primarily environmental or public health databases were not included, but places where ag grantees would publish data were considered. Search methods We first compiled a list of known domain specific USDA / ARS datasets / databases that are represented in the Ag Data Commons, including ARS Image Gallery, ARS Nutrition Databases (sub-components), SoyBase, PeanutBase, National Fungus Collection, i5K Workspace @ NAL, and GRIN. We then searched using search engines such as Bing and Google for non-USDA / federal ag databases, using Boolean variations of “agricultural data” /“ag data” / “scientific data” + NOT + USDA (to filter out the federal / USDA results). Most of these results were domain specific, though some contained a mix of data subjects. We then used search engines such as Bing and Google to find top agricultural university repositories using variations of “agriculture”, “ag data” and “university” to find schools with agriculture programs. Using that list of universities, we searched each university web site to see if their institution had a repository for their unique, independent research data if not apparent in the initial web browser search. We found both ag specific university repositories and general university repositories that housed a portion of agricultural data. Ag specific university repositories are included in the list of domain-specific repositories. Results included Columbia University – International Research Institute for Climate and Society, UC Davis – Cover Crops Database, etc. If a general university repository existed, we determined whether that repository could filter to include only data results after our chosen ag search terms were applied. General university databases that contain ag data included Colorado State University Digital Collections, University of Michigan ICPSR (Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research), and University of Minnesota DRUM (Digital Repository of the University of Minnesota). We then split out NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) repositories. Next we searched the internet for open general data repositories using a variety of search engines, and repositories containing a mix of data, journals, books, and other types of records were tested to determine whether that repository could filter for data results after search terms were applied. General subject data repositories include Figshare, Open Science Framework, PANGEA, Protein Data Bank, and Zenodo. Finally, we compared scholarly journal suggestions for data repositories against our list to fill in any missing repositories that might contain agricultural data. Extensive lists of journals were compiled, in which USDA published in 2012 and 2016, combining search results in ARIS, Scopus, and the Forest Service's TreeSearch, plus the USDA web sites Economic Research Service (ERS), National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Natural Resources and Conservation Service (NRCS), Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), Rural Development (RD), and Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS). The top 50 journals' author instructions were consulted to see if they (a) ask or require submitters to provide supplemental data, or (b) require submitters to submit data to open repositories. Data are provided for Journals based on a 2012 and 2016 study of where USDA employees publish their research studies, ranked by number of articles, including 2015/2016 Impact Factor, Author guidelines, Supplemental Data?, Supplemental Data reviewed?, Open Data (Supplemental or in Repository) Required? and Recommended data repositories, as provided in the online author guidelines for each the top 50 journals. Evaluation We ran a series of searches on all resulting general subject databases with the designated search terms. From the results, we noted the total number of datasets in the repository, type of resource searched (datasets, data, images, components, etc.), percentage of the total database that each term comprised, any dataset with a search term that comprised at least 1% and 5% of the total collection, and any search term that returned greater than 100 and greater than 500 results. We compared domain-specific databases and repositories based on parent organization, type of institution, and whether data submissions were dependent on conditions such as funding or affiliation of some kind. Results A summary of the major findings from our data review: Over half of the top 50 ag-related journals from our profile require or encourage open data for their published authors. There are few general repositories that are both large AND contain a significant portion of ag data in their collection. GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility), ICPSR, and ORNL DAAC were among those that had over 500 datasets returned with at least one ag search term and had that result comprise at least 5% of the total collection. Not even one quarter of the domain-specific repositories and datasets reviewed allow open submission by any researcher regardless of funding or affiliation. See included README file for descriptions of each individual data file in this dataset. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Journals. File Name: Journals.csvResource Title: Journals - Recommended repositories. File Name: Repos_from_journals.csvResource Title: TDWG presentation. File Name: TDWG_Presentation.pptxResource Title: Domain Specific ag data sources. File Name: domain_specific_ag_databases.csvResource Title: Data Dictionary for Ag Data Repository Inventory. File Name: Ag_Data_Repo_DD.csvResource Title: General repositories containing ag data. File Name: general_repos_1.csvResource Title: README and file inventory. File Name: README_InventoryPublicDBandREepAgData.txt

Dataset Versioning for Analytics Market Outlook

As per our latest research, the global dataset versioning for analytics market size in 2024 stood at USD 1.27 billion, driven by the increasing adoption of advanced analytics, AI, and regulatory compliance needs across industries. The market is experiencing robust momentum, with a recorded CAGR of 18.9% from 2025 to 2033. By the end of 2033, the dataset versioning for analytics market is forecasted to reach USD 6.35 billion, reflecting the growing significance of efficient data management and traceability in the digital transformation era. This rapid expansion is attributed to the critical role dataset versioning plays in ensuring data integrity, reproducibility, and collaborative analytics workflows.

The primary growth factor fueling the dataset versioning for analytics market is the exponential increase in data volume and complexity across enterprises. As organizations embrace digital transformation and integrate advanced analytics into their business processes, the need for robust data management solutions has become paramount. Dataset versioning tools enable businesses to maintain historical records of data changes, facilitating audit trails, compliance, and reproducibility in analytics and machine learning projects. These capabilities are particularly vital in regulated industries such as BFSI and healthcare, where data integrity and traceability are non-negotiable. The proliferation of big data, coupled with the rise of AI and machine learning, is further intensifying the demand for sophisticated dataset versioning solutions that can handle diverse data sources, formats, and collaborative workflows.

Another significant driver for the dataset versioning for analytics market is the increasing emphasis on data governance and regulatory compliance. With stringent data protection regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA coming into force globally, organizations are under immense pressure to ensure data quality, lineage, and accountability. Dataset versioning platforms offer a structured approach to tracking data modifications, access, and usage, thereby aiding compliance efforts and reducing the risk of data breaches or non-compliance penalties. Furthermore, these solutions empower organizations to establish clear data stewardship practices, automate data governance policies, and provide transparency to stakeholders, which is essential for building trust in data-driven decision-making environments.

The surge in collaborative analytics and remote work models is also propelling the growth of the dataset versioning for analytics market. As data science and analytics teams become increasingly distributed, the ability to collaborate seamlessly on shared datasets is critical. Dataset versioning solutions enable multiple users to work on the same data without overwriting each other's changes, maintaining a unified source of truth and supporting agile experimentation. This collaborative functionality is especially valuable in industries such as IT & telecommunications, manufacturing, and retail, where cross-functional teams rely on real-time data insights for innovation and operational efficiency. The integration of dataset versioning with cloud-based analytics platforms further enhances accessibility, scalability, and cost-effectiveness, making it an indispensable tool for modern enterprises.

From a regional perspective, North America continues to dominate the dataset versioning for analytics market, accounting for the largest revenue share in 2024. This leadership is attributed to the region's early adoption of advanced analytics technologies, a mature regulatory environment, and a high concentration of data-driven enterprises. However, Asia Pacific is emerging as the fastest-growing market, fueled by rapid digitalization, expanding IT infrastructure, and increasing investments in AI and big data analytics. Europe also holds a significant share, driven by strict data privacy regulations and a strong focus on data governance. The Middle East & Africa and Latin America are witnessing steady growth, supported by ongoing digital transformation initiatives and rising awareness of data management best practices.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the population of College Springs by gender, including both male and female populations. This dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution of College Springs across both sexes and to determine which sex constitutes the majority.

Key observations

There is a majority of male population, with 56.68% of total population being male. Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Scope of gender :

Please note that American Community Survey asks a question about the respondents current sex, but not about gender, sexual orientation, or sex at birth. The question is intended to capture data for biological sex, not gender. Respondents are supposed to respond with the answer as either of Male or Female. Our research and this dataset mirrors the data reported as Male and Female for gender distribution analysis. No further analysis is done on the data reported from the Census Bureau.

Variables / Data Columns

• Gender: This column displays the Gender (Male / Female)
• Population: The population of the gender in the College Springs is shown in this column.
• % of Total Population: This column displays the percentage distribution of each gender as a proportion of College Springs total population. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for College Springs Population by Race & Ethnicity. You can refer the same here

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the median household income in Great Falls. It can be utilized to understand the trend in median household income and to analyze the income distribution in Great Falls by household type, size, and across various income brackets.

Content

The dataset will have the following datasets when applicable

Please note: The 2020 1-Year ACS estimates data was not reported by the Census Bureau due to the impact on survey collection and analysis caused by COVID-19. Consequently, median household income data for 2020 is unavailable for large cities (population 65,000 and above).

• Great Falls, SC Median Household Income Trends (2010-2021, in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars)
• Median Household Income Variation by Family Size in Great Falls, SC: Comparative analysis across 7 household sizes
• Income Distribution by Quintile: Mean Household Income in Great Falls, SC
• Great Falls, SC households by income brackets: family, non-family, and total, in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Interested in deeper insights and visual analysis?

Explore our comprehensive data analysis and visual representations for a deeper understanding of Great Falls median household income. You can refer the same here

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Good Hope household income by gender. The dataset can be utilized to understand the gender-based income distribution of Good Hope income.

Content

The dataset will have the following datasets when applicable

Please note: The 2020 1-Year ACS estimates data was not reported by the Census Bureau due to the impact on survey collection and analysis caused by COVID-19. Consequently, median household income data for 2020 is unavailable for large cities (population 65,000 and above).

• Good Hope, GA annual median income by work experience and sex dataset : Aged 15+, 2010-2022 (in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars)
• Good Hope, GA annual income distribution by work experience and gender dataset (Number of individuals ages 15+ with income, 2021)

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Interested in deeper insights and visual analysis?

Explore our comprehensive data analysis and visual representations for a deeper understanding of Good Hope income distribution by gender. You can refer the same here

The dataset that accompanies the "Build Better LibGuides" chapter of Teaching Information Literacy in Political Science, Public Affairs, and International Studies. This dataset was created to compare current practices in Political Science, Public Affairs, and International Studies (PSPAIS) LibGuides with recommended best practices using a sample that represents a variety of academic institutions. Members of the ACRL Politics, Policy, and International Relations Section (PPIRS) were identified as the librarians most likely to be actively engaged with these specific subjects, so the dataset was scoped by identifying the institutions associated with the most active PPIRS members and then locating the LibGuides in these and related disciplines. The resulting dataset includes 101 guides at 46 institutions, for a total of 887 LibGuide tabs. Methods This dataset was created to compare current practices in Political Science, Public Affairs, and International Studies (PSPAIS) LibGuides with recommended best practices using a sample that represents a variety of academic institutions. Members of the ACRL Politics, Policy, and International Relations Section (PPIRS) were identified as the librarians most likely to be actively engaged with these specific subjects, so the dataset was scoped by identifying the institutions associated with the most active PPIRS members and then locating the LibGuides in these and related disciplines. Specifically, a student assistant collected the names and institutional affiliations of each member serving on a PPIRS committee as of July 1, 2021, 2022, and 2023. The student then removed the individual librarian names from the list and located the links to the Political Science or Government; Public Policy, Public Affairs, or Public Administration; and International Studies or International Relations LibGuides at each institution. The chapter author then confirmed and, in a few cases, added to the student's work and copied and pasted the tab names from each guide (which conveniently were also hyperlinked) into a Google Sheet. The resulting dataset included 101 guides at 46 institutions, for a total of 887 LibGuide tabs. A Google Apps script was used to extract the hyperlinks from the collected tab names and then a Python script was used to scrape the names of links included on each of the tabs. LibGuides from two institutions returned errors during the link name scraping process and were excluded in this part of the analysis.