Comparison of Represents the average of math benchmarks in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (AIME 2024 & Math-500) by Model

Until the fourth quarter of 2023, the S&P 500 and the S&P 500 ESG index exhibited similar performance, both indexes were weighted to similar industries as the S&P 500 followed the leading 500 companies in the United States. Throughout 2024, the S&P 500 ESG index steadily outperformed the S&P 500 by ***** points on average. During the coronavirus pandemic, the technology sector was one of the best-performing sectors in the market. The major differences between the two indexes were the S&P 500 ESG index was skewed towards firms with higher environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores and had a higher concentration of technology securities than the S&P 500 index. What is a market capitalization index? Both the S&P 500 and the S&P 500 ESG are market capitalization indexes, meaning the individual components (such as stocks and other securities) weighted to the indexes influence the overall value. Market trends such as inflation, interest rates, and international issues like the coronavirus pandemic and the popularity of ESG among professional investors affect the performance of stocks. When weighted components rise in value, this causes an increase in the overall value of the index they are weighted too. What trends are driving index performance? Recent economic and social trends have led to higher levels of ESG integration and maintenance among firms worldwide and higher prioritization from investors to include ESG-focused firms in their investment choices. From a global survey group over ********* of the respondents were willing to prioritize ESG benefits over a higher return on their investment. These trends influenced the performance of securities on the market, leading to an increased value of individual weighted stocks, resulting in an overall increase in the index value.

Comparison of Represents the average of coding benchmarks in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (LiveCodeBench & SciCode) by Model

The value of the DJIA index amounted to ********* at the end of March 2025, up from ********* at the end of March 2020. Global panic about the coronavirus epidemic caused the drop in March 2020, which was the worst drop since the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008. Dow Jones Industrial Average index – additional information The Dow Jones Industrial Average index is a price-weighted average of 30 of the largest American publicly traded companies on New York Stock Exchange and NASDAQ, and includes companies like Goldman Sachs, IBM and Walt Disney. This index is considered to be a barometer of the state of the American economy. DJIA index was created in 1986 by Charles Dow. Along with the NASDAQ 100 and S&P 500 indices, it is amongst the most well-known and used stock indexes in the world. The year that the 2018 financial crisis unfolded was one of the worst years of the Dow. It was also in 2008 that some of the largest ever recorded losses of the Dow Jones Index based on single-day points were registered. On September 29, 2008, for instance, the Dow had a loss of ****** points, one of the largest single-day losses of all times. The best years in the history of the index still are 1915, when the index value increased by ***** percent in one year, and 1933, year when the index registered a growth of ***** percent.

China's main stock market index, the SHANGHAI, rose to 3510 points on July 11, 2025, gaining 0.01% from the previous session. Over the past month, the index has climbed 3.16% and is up 18.14% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks this benchmark index from China. China Shanghai Composite Stock Market Index - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on July of 2025.

The main stock market index of United States, the US500, fell to 6260 points on July 11, 2025, losing 0.33% from the previous session. Over the past month, the index has climbed 3.55% and is up 11.48% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks this benchmark index from United States. United States Stock Market Index - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on July of 2025.

Comparison of Tokens used to run all evaluations in the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index by Model

Baltic Dry rose to 1,663 Index Points on July 11, 2025, up 13.52% from the previous day. Over the past month, Baltic Dry's price has fallen 15.50%, and is down 16.73% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. Baltic Exchange Dry Index - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on July of 2025.

View data of the S&P 500, an index of the stocks of 500 leading companies in the US economy, which provides a gauge of the U.S. equity market.

Comparison of the JACCARD INDEX of the datasets between each algorithm.

Comprehensive comparison of Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index vs. Output Tokens Used in Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (Log Scale) by Model

Graph and download economic data for Global Price Index of All Commodities (PALLFNFINDEXQ) from Q1 2003 to Q1 2025 about World, commodities, price index, indexes, and price.

Comparison of the RAND INDEX of the datasets between each algorithm.

Russia's main stock market index, the MOEX, fell to 2642 points on July 11, 2025, losing 3.31% from the previous session. Over the past month, the index has declined 3.94% and is down 11.21% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks this benchmark index from Russia. Russia Stock Market Index MOEX CFD - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on July of 2025.

Comprehensive comparison of Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index vs. Context Window (Tokens) by Model

Comprehensive comparison of Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index vs. Seconds to Output 500 Tokens, including reasoning model 'thinking' time by Model

Graph and download economic data for Producer Price Index by Industry: Total Manufacturing Industries (PCUOMFGOMFG) from Dec 1984 to May 2025 about manufacturing, PPI, industry, inflation, price index, indexes, price, and USA.

Key information about India Sensitive 30 (Sensex)

• India Sensitive 30 (Sensex) closed at 73,198.1 points in Feb 2025, compared with 77,500.6 points at the previous month end
• India Equity Market Index: Month End: BSE: Sensitive 30 (Sensex) data is updated monthly, available from Apr 1979 to Feb 2025, with an average number of 4,285.0 points
• The data reached an all-time high of 84,299.8 points in Sep 2024 and a record low of 115.6 points in Nov 1979

• In the latest reports, SENSEX recorded a daily P/E ratio of 20.6 in Mar 2025

Canada's main stock market index, the TSX, fell to 27023 points on July 11, 2025, losing 0.22% from the previous session. Over the past month, the index has climbed 1.53% and is up 19.18% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks this benchmark index from Canada. Canada Stock Market Index (TSX) - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on July of 2025.

10th DIMACS Implementation Challenge

Updated July 2012

http://www.cc.gatech.edu/dimacs10/index.shtml http://www.cise.ufl.edu/research/sparse/dimacs10

As stated on their main website ( http://dimacs.rutgers.edu/Challenges/ ), the "DIMACS Implementation Challenges address questions of determining realistic algorithm performance where worst case analysis is overly pessimistic and probabilistic models are too unrealistic: experimentation can provide guides to realistic algorithm performance where analysis fails."

For the 10th DIMACS Implementation Challenge, the two related problems of graph partitioning and graph clustering were chosen. Graph partitioning and graph clustering are among the aforementioned questions or problem areas where theoretical and practical results deviate significantly from each other, so that experimental outcomes are of particular interest.

Problem Motivation

Graph partitioning and graph clustering are ubiquitous subtasks in many application areas. Generally speaking, both techniques aim at the identification of vertex subsets with many internal and few external edges. To name only a few, problems addressed by graph partitioning and graph clustering algorithms are:

• What are the communities within an (online) social network?
• How do I speed up a numerical simulation by mapping it efficiently onto a parallel computer?
• How must components be organized on a computer chip such that they can communicate efficiently with each other?
• What are the segments of a digital image?
• Which functions are certain genes (most likely) responsible for?

Challenge Goals

• One goal of this Challenge is to create a reproducible picture of the state-of-the-art in the area of graph partitioning (GP) and graph clustering (GC) algorithms. To this end we are identifying a standard set of benchmark instances and generators.

• Moreover, after initiating a discussion with the community, we would like to establish the most appropriate problem formulations and objective functions for a variety of applications.

• Another goal is to enable current researchers to compare their codes with each other, in hopes of identifying the most effective algorithmic innovations that have been proposed.

• The final goal is to publish proceedings containing results presented at the Challenge workshop, and a book containing the best of the proceedings papers.

Problems Addressed

The precise problem formulations need to be established in the course of the Challenge. The descriptions below serve as a starting point.

• Graph partitioning:

  The most common formulation of the graph partitioning problem for an undirected graph G = (V,E) asks for a division of V into k pairwise disjoint subsets (partitions) such that all partitions are of approximately equal size and the edge-cut, i.e., the total number of edges having their incident nodes in different subdomains, is minimized. The problem is known to be NP-hard.

• Graph clustering:

  Clustering is an important tool for investigating the structural properties of data. Generally speaking, clustering refers to the grouping of objects such that objects in the same cluster are more similar to each other than to objects of different clusters. The similarity measure depends on the underlying application. Clustering graphs usually refers to the identification of vertex subsets (clusters) that have significantly more internal edges (to vertices of the same cluster) than external ones (to vertices of another cluster).

There are 12 data sets in the DIMACS10 collection:

clustering: real-world graphs commonly used as benchmarks coauthor: citation and co-author networks Delaunay: Delaunay triangulations of random points in the plane dyn-frames: frames from a 2D dynamic simulation Kronecker: synthetic graphs from the Graph500 benchmark numerical: graphs from numerical simulation random: random geometric graphs (random points in the unit square) streets: real-world street networks Walshaw: Chris Walshaw's graph partitioning archive matrix: graphs from the UF collection (not added here) redistrict: census networks star-mixtures : artificially generated from sets of real graphs

Some of the graphs already exist in the UF Collection. In some cases, the original graph is unsymmetric, with values, whereas the DIMACS graph is the symmetrized pattern of A+A'. Rather than add duplicate patterns to the UF Collection, a MATLAB script is provided at http://www.cise.ufl.edu/research/sparse/dimacs10 which downloads each matrix from the UF Collection via UFget, and then performs whatever operation is required to convert the matrix to the DIMACS graph problem. Also posted at that page is a MATLAB code (metis_graph) for reading the DIMACS *.graph files into MATLAB.

https://sparse.tamu.edu/DIMACS10