According to a ranking by Statista and Newsweek, the best hospital in the United States is the *********** in Rochester, Minnesota. Moreover, the *********** was also ranked as the best hospital in the world, among over 50,000 hospitals in 30 countries. **************** in Ohio and the ************* Hospital in Maryland were ranked as second and third best respectively in the U.S., while they were second and forth best respectively in the World.

According to a ranking by Statista and Newsweek, the world's best hospital is the *********** in Rochester, Minnesota. A total of **** U.S. hospitals made it to the top ten list, while one hospital in each of the following countries was also ranked among the top ten best hospitals in the world: Canada, Sweden, Germany, Israel, Singapore, and Switzerland.

The average for 2020 based on 36 countries was 4.44 hospital beds. The highest value was in South Korea: 12.65 hospital beds and the lowest value was in Mexico: 0.99 hospital beds. The indicator is available from 1960 to 2021. Below is a chart for all countries where data are available.

According to a ranking by Statista and Newsweek, the best hospital in Denmark is the Rigshospitalet - København in Copenhagen. Moreover, the Rigshospitalet - København was also ranked as the **** best hospital in the world, among over ****** hospitals in ** countries. Aarhus Universitetshospital in Aarhus and Odense Universitetshospital in Odense were ranked as second and third best respectively in the Denmark, while they were **** and **** best respectively in the World.

This dataset provides values for HOSPITAL BEDS reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

According to a hospital ranking carried out in 2022 and based on seven different dimensions, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein was considered the hospital with the highest care quality in Latin America. Located in São Paulo - Brazil, this health institution reached a quality index score of *****. Hospital Sírio-Libanês also located in Brazil, ranked second, with a score of *****. Latin American hospitals and their capacity to host patients When it comes to hosting patients, hospitals Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre located in Brazil, and Sanatorio Guemes based in Argentina, ranked among the leading hospitals in Latin America as of 2022. It was estimated that Brazil and Argentina were the two Latin American countries with the highest number of hospital beds in the region in 2020, with more than ******* and ******* hospital beds, respectively. Public opinion on healthcare quality It was also Argentina that had the highest share of satisfied patients among a selection of countries in Latin America according to a 2023 survey, with ** percent of interviewees stating they had accessed a good or very good healthcare service. Colombian patients followed, with **** out of ten people satisfied with the healthcare received. Accordingly, a recent study estimated that nearly half of the population in Argentina and Colombia distrusted the healthcare system, with approximately ** percent and ** percent of respondents claiming they trust the health systems in their respective countries.

Context

This are the official datasets used on the Medicare.gov Hospital Compare Website provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. These data allow you to compare the quality of care at over 4,000 Medicare-certified hospitals across the country.

Content

Dataset fields:

• Provider ID
• Hospital Name
• Address
• City
• State
• ZIP Code
• County Name
• Phone Number
• Hospital Type
• Hospital Ownership
• Emergency Services
• Meets criteria for meaningful use of EHRs
• Hospital overall rating
• Hospital overall rating footnote
• Mortality national comparison
• Mortality national comparison footnote
• Safety of care national comparison
• Safety of care national comparison footnote
• Readmission national comparison
• Readmission national comparison footnote
• Patient experience national comparison
• Patient experience national comparison footnote
• Effectiveness of care national comparison
• Effectiveness of care national comparison footnote
• Timeliness of care national comparison
• Timeliness of care national comparison footnote
• Efficient use of medical imaging national comparison
• Efficient use of medical imaging national comparison

Acknowledgements

Dataset was downloaded from [https://data.medicare.gov/data/hospital-compare]

Inspiration

If you just broke your leg, you might need to use this dataset to find the best Hospital to get that fixed!

According to a ranking by Statista and Newsweek, the best hospital in Sweden is the Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset in Stockholm. Moreover, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset was also ranked as the seventh-best hospital in the world, among over ****** hospitals in ** countries. Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset in Göteborg and Akademiska Sjukhuset in Uppsala were ranked as second and third best respectively in the Sweden, while they were **** and **** best respectively in the World.

This dataset provides values for HOSPITALS reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

This horizontal bar chart displays hospital beds (per 1,000 people) by country using the aggregation average, weighted by population in Europe. The data is about countries.

According to a ranking by Statista and Newsweek, the best hospital in Finland is Helsinki University Hospital in Helsinki. Moreover, Helsinki University Hospital was also ranked as the **** best hospital in the world, among over ****** hospitals in ** countries. Tampere University Hospital in Tampere and Turku University Hospital in Turku were ranked as second and third best respectively in the Finland, while they were ***** and ***** best respectively in the World.

South Korea Number of Hospital was up 3.5% in 2019, compared to the previous year.

Abstract

Different countries have different health outcomes that are in part due to the way respective health systems perform. Regardless of the type of health system, individuals will have health and non-health expectations in terms of how the institution responds to their needs. In many countries, however, health systems do not perform effectively and this is in part due to lack of information on health system performance, and on the different service providers.

The aim of the WHO World Health Survey is to provide empirical data to the national health information systems so that there is a better monitoring of health of the people, responsiveness of health systems and measurement of health-related parameters.

The overall aims of the survey is to examine the way populations report their health, understand how people value health states, measure the performance of health systems in relation to responsiveness and gather information on modes and extents of payment for health encounters through a nationally representative population based community survey. In addition, it addresses various areas such as health care expenditures, adult mortality, birth history, various risk factors, assessment of main chronic health conditions and the coverage of health interventions, in specific additional modules.

The objectives of the survey programme are to: 1. develop a means of providing valid, reliable and comparable information, at low cost, to supplement the information provided by routine health information systems. 2. build the evidence base necessary for policy-makers to monitor if health systems are achieving the desired goals, and to assess if additional investment in health is achieving the desired outcomes. 3. provide policy-makers with the evidence they need to adjust their policies, strategies and programmes as necessary.

Geographic coverage

The survey sampling frame must cover 100% of the country's eligible population, meaning that the entire national territory must be included. This does not mean that every province or territory need be represented in the survey sample but, rather, that all must have a chance (known probability) of being included in the survey sample.

There may be exceptional circumstances that preclude 100% national coverage. Certain areas in certain countries may be impossible to include due to reasons such as accessibility or conflict. All such exceptions must be discussed with WHO sampling experts. If any region must be excluded, it must constitute a coherent area, such as a particular province or region. For example if ¾ of region D in country X is not accessible due to war, the entire region D will be excluded from analysis.

Analysis unit

Households and individuals

Universe

The WHS will include all male and female adults (18 years of age and older) who are not out of the country during the survey period. It should be noted that this includes the population who may be institutionalized for health reasons at the time of the survey: all persons who would have fit the definition of household member at the time of their institutionalisation are included in the eligible population.

If the randomly selected individual is institutionalized short-term (e.g. a 3-day stay at a hospital) the interviewer must return to the household when the individual will have come back to interview him/her. If the randomly selected individual is institutionalized long term (e.g. has been in a nursing home the last 8 years), the interviewer must travel to that institution to interview him/her.

The target population includes any adult, male or female age 18 or over living in private households. Populations in group quarters, on military reservations, or in other non-household living arrangements will not be eligible for the study. People who are in an institution due to a health condition (such as a hospital, hospice, nursing home, home for the aged, etc.) at the time of the visit to the household are interviewed either in the institution or upon their return to their household if this is within a period of two weeks from the first visit to the household.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

SAMPLING GUIDELINES FOR WHS

Surveys in the WHS program must employ a probability sampling design. This means that every single individual in the sampling frame has a known and non-zero chance of being selected into the survey sample. While a Single Stage Random Sample is ideal if feasible, it is recognized that most sites will carry out Multi-stage Cluster Sampling.

The WHS sampling frame should cover 100% of the eligible population in the surveyed country. This means that every eligible person in the country has a chance of being included in the survey sample. It also means that particular ethnic groups or geographical areas may not be excluded from the sampling frame.

The sample size of the WHS in each country is 5000 persons (exceptions considered on a by-country basis). An adequate number of persons must be drawn from the sampling frame to account for an estimated amount of non-response (refusal to participate, empty houses etc.). The highest estimate of potential non-response and empty households should be used to ensure that the desired sample size is reached at the end of the survey period. This is very important because if, at the end of data collection, the required sample size of 5000 has not been reached additional persons must be selected randomly into the survey sample from the sampling frame. This is both costly and technically complicated (if this situation is to occur, consult WHO sampling experts for assistance), and best avoided by proper planning before data collection begins.

All steps of sampling, including justification for stratification, cluster sizes, probabilities of selection, weights at each stage of selection, and the computer program used for randomization must be communicated to WHO

STRATIFICATION

Stratification is the process by which the population is divided into subgroups. Sampling will then be conducted separately in each subgroup. Strata or subgroups are chosen because evidence is available that they are related to the outcome (e.g. health, responsiveness, mortality, coverage etc.). The strata chosen will vary by country and reflect local conditions. Some examples of factors that can be stratified on are geography (e.g. North, Central, South), level of urbanization (e.g. urban, rural), socio-economic zones, provinces (especially if health administration is primarily under the jurisdiction of provincial authorities), or presence of health facility in area. Strata to be used must be identified by each country and the reasons for selection explicitly justified.

Stratification is strongly recommended at the first stage of sampling. Once the strata have been chosen and justified, all stages of selection will be conducted separately in each stratum. We recommend stratifying on 3-5 factors. It is optimum to have half as many strata (note the difference between stratifying variables, which may be such variables as gender, socio-economic status, province/region etc. and strata, which are the combination of variable categories, for example Male, High socio-economic status, Xingtao Province would be a stratum).

Strata should be as homogenous as possible within and as heterogeneous as possible between. This means that strata should be formulated in such a way that individuals belonging to a stratum should be as similar to each other with respect to key variables as possible and as different as possible from individuals belonging to a different stratum. This maximises the efficiency of stratification in reducing sampling variance.

MULTI-STAGE CLUSTER SELECTION

A cluster is a naturally occurring unit or grouping within the population (e.g. enumeration areas, cities, universities, provinces, hospitals etc.); it is a unit for which the administrative level has clear, nonoverlapping boundaries. Cluster sampling is useful because it avoids having to compile exhaustive lists of every single person in the population. Clusters should be as heterogeneous as possible within and as homogenous as possible between (note that this is the opposite criterion as that for strata). Clusters should be as small as possible (i.e. large administrative units such as Provinces or States are not good clusters) but not so small as to be homogenous.

In cluster sampling, a number of clusters are randomly selected from a list of clusters. Then, either all members of the chosen cluster or a random selection from among them are included in the sample. Multistage sampling is an extension of cluster sampling where a hierarchy of clusters are chosen going from larger to smaller.

In order to carry out multi-stage sampling, one needs to know only the population sizes of the sampling units. For the smallest sampling unit above the elementary unit however, a complete list of all elementary units (households) is needed; in order to be able to randomly select among all households in the TSU, a list of all those households is required. This information may be available from the most recent population census. If the last census was >3 years ago or the information furnished by it was of poor quality or unreliable, the survey staff will have the task of enumerating all households in the smallest randomly selected sampling unit. It is very important to budget for this step if it is necessary and ensure that all households are properly enumerated in order that a representative sample is obtained.

It is always best to have as many clusters in the PSU as possible. The reason for this is that the fewer the number of respondents in each PSU, the lower will be the clustering effect which

This horizontal bar chart displays hospital beds (per 1,000 people) by region using the aggregation average, weighted by population. The data is about countries.

DISCLAIMER

Dataset consists of historical data of pre-pandemic period and doesn’t represent the current reality which may have changed due to the spikes in demand. This dataset has been generated in collaboration of efforts within CoronaWhy community.

Context

Last updated: April 26th 2020 Updates: April 14th 2020 - Added missing population data April 15th 2020 - Added Brazil statewise ICU hospital beds dataset April 21th 2020 - Added Italy, Spain statewise ICU hospital beds dataset, India statewise TOTAL hospital beds dataset April 26th 2020 - Added Sweden ICU(2019) and TOTAL(2018) beds datasets

Purpose of the dataset

I am trying to produce a dataset that will provide a foundation for policymakers to understand the realistic capacity of healthcare providers being able to deal with the spikes in demand for intensive care. As a way to help, I’ve prepared a dataset of beds across countries and states. Work in progress dataset that should and will be updated as more data becomes available and public on weekly basis.

Importance

This dataset is intended to be used as a baseline for understanding the typical bed capacity and coverage globally. This information is critical for understanding the impact of a high utilization event, like COVID-19.

Current challenges

Datasets are scattered across the web and are very hard to normalize, I did my best but help would be much appreciated.

Data sources / Acknowledgments

arcgis (USA) - https://services1.arcgis.com/Hp6G80Pky0om7QvQ/arcgis/rest/services/Hospitals_1/FeatureServer/0 KHN (USA) - https://khn.org/news/as-coronavirus-spreads-widely-millions-of-older-americans-live-in-counties-with-no-icu-beds/ datahub.io (World) - https://datahub.io/world-bank/sh.med.beds.zs eurostat - https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/vswUL3c6yKoyahrvIRyew OECD - https://data.oecd.org/healtheqt/hospital-beds.htm WDI (World) - https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.MED.BEDS.ZS NHP(India) - http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/showfile.php?lid=1147 data.gov.sg (Singapore) - https://data.gov.sg/dataset/health-facilities?view_id=91b4feed-dcb9-4720-8cb0-ac2f04b7efd0&resource_id=dee5ccce-4dfb-467f-bcb4-dc025b56b977 dati.salute.gov.it (Italy)- http://www.dati.salute.gov.it/dati/dettaglioDataset.jsp?menu=dati&idPag=96 portal.icuregswe.org (Sweden) - https://portal.icuregswe.org/seiva/en/Rapport publications: Intensive Care Medicine Journal (Europe) - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-012-2627-8 Critical Care Medicine Journal (Asia) - https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Number-of-critical-care-beds-per-100-000-population_fig1_338520008 Medicina Intensiva (Spain) - https://www.medintensiva.org/en-pdf-S2173572713000878 news: https://lanuovaferrara.gelocal.it/italia-mondo/cronaca/2020/03/19/news/dietro-la-corsa-a-nuovi-posti-in-terapia-intensiva-gli-errori-del-passato-1.38611596 kaggle: germany - https://www.kaggle.com/manuelblechschmidt/icu-beds-in-germany brazil (IBGE) - https://www.kaggle.com/thiagobodruk/brazilianstates Manual population data search from wiki

Data columns

country,state,county,lat,lng,type,measure,beds,population,year,source,source_url - country - country of origin, if present - state - more granular location, if present - lat - latitude - lng - longtitude - type - [TOTAL, ICU, ACUTE(some data could include ICU beds too), PSYCHIATRIC, OTHER(merged ‘SPECIAL’, ‘CHRONIC DISEASE’, ‘CHILDREN’, ‘LONG TERM CARE’, ‘REHABILITATION’, ‘WOMEN’, ‘MILITARY’] - measure - type of measure (per 1000 inhabitants) - beds - number of beds per 1000 - population - population of location based on multiple sources and wikipedia - year - source year for beds and population data - source - source of data - source_url - URL of the original source

Files

for each of datasource: hospital_beds_per_source.csv

US only: US arcgis + khn (state/county granularity): hospital_beds_USA.csv

Global (state(region)/county granularity): hospital_beds_global_regional.csv

Global (country granularity): hospital_beds_global_v1.csv

Contributors

Igor Kiulian - extracting/normalizing/formatting/merging data Artur Kiulian - helped with Kaggle setup Augaly S. Kiedi - helped with country population data Kristoffer Jan Zieba - found Swedish data sources

Possible Improvements

Find and megre more detailed (state/county wise) or newer datasource

According to a ranking by Statista and Newsweek, the best hospital in Norway is Oslo Universitetssykehus in Oslo. Moreover, Oslo Universitetssykehus was also ranked as the **** best hospital in the world, among over ****** hospitals in ** countries. St. Olavs Hospital in Trondheim and Haukeland Universitetssykehus in Bergen were ranked as second and third best respectively in the Norway, while they were ***** and ***** best respectively in the World.

This horizontal bar chart displays hospital beds (per 1,000 people) by country using the aggregation average, weighted by population in Honduras. The data is filtered where the date is 2021. The data is about countries per year.

This horizontal bar chart displays hospital beds (per 1,000 people) by country using the aggregation average, weighted by population in Africa. The data is about countries.

The Children’s Hospitals in Africa Mapping Project (CHAMP) survey was developed and implemented to assess the capabilities of some of the best resourced sub-Saharan African hospitals serving children. The aim was to evaluate hospital facilities, infrastructure, equipment, supplies, services, staffing, and readiness to care for children amid public health emergencies. This report analysed a subset of survey questions that characterised the hospitals and assessed facilities, equipment, supplies, infrastructure and capacity to respond to emergencies and outbreaks. Twenty-four sites were recruited. Twenty hospitals from 15 countries completed the survey from 2018 to 2019. This portion of the CHAMP study identified issues with facilities, equipment, supplies, infrastructure, and the capacity to respond to emergencies and infectious disease outbreaks. On a day-to-day basis, most hospitals were operating at or near capacity and frequently experienced power outages and water shortages. Overall, most hospitals were ill-prepared to manage a major disaster or infectious disease outbreak. If countries are to be prepared to deal with current needs as well as to prevent, detect, and rapidly respond to public health threats, hospitals that care for children will require significant investments.

In 2023, Singapore dominated the ranking of the world's health and health systems, followed by Japan and South Korea. The health index score is calculated by evaluating various indicators that assess the health of the population, and access to the services required to sustain good health, including health outcomes, health systems, sickness and risk factors, and mortality rates. The health and health system index score of the top ten countries with the best healthcare system in the world ranged between 82 and 86.9, measured on a scale of zero to 100.

Global Health Security Index  Numerous health and health system indexes have been developed to assess various attributes and aspects of a nation's healthcare system. One such measure is the Global Health Security (GHS) index. This index evaluates the ability of 195 nations to identify, assess, and mitigate biological hazards in addition to political and socioeconomic concerns, the quality of their healthcare systems, and their compliance with international finance and standards. In 2021, the United States was ranked at the top of the GHS index, but due to multiple reasons, the U.S. government failed to effectively manage the COVID-19 pandemic. The GHS Index evaluates capability and identifies preparation gaps; nevertheless, it cannot predict a nation's resource allocation in case of a public health emergency.

Universal Health Coverage Index  Another health index that is used globally by the members of the United Nations (UN) is the universal health care (UHC) service coverage index. The UHC index monitors the country's progress related to the sustainable developmental goal (SDG) number three. The UHC service coverage index tracks 14 indicators related to reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health, infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases, service capacity, and access to care. The main target of universal health coverage is to ensure that no one is denied access to essential medical services due to financial hardships. In 2021, the UHC index scores ranged from as low as 21 to a high score of 91 across 194 countries.