This dataset shows the the world's best hospital in 2023 issued by the Newsweek and Statista.

According to a ranking by Statista and Newsweek, the world's best hospital is the *********** in Rochester, Minnesota. A total of **** U.S. hospitals made it to the top ten list, while one hospital in each of the following countries was also ranked among the top ten best hospitals in the world: Canada, Sweden, Germany, Israel, Singapore, and Switzerland.

According to a ranking by Statista and Newsweek, the best hospital in the United States is the *********** in Rochester, Minnesota. Moreover, the *********** was also ranked as the best hospital in the world, among over 50,000 hospitals in 30 countries. **************** in Ohio and the ************* Hospital in Maryland were ranked as second and third best respectively in the U.S., while they were second and forth best respectively in the World.

According to a ranking of the best hospitals in the U.S., the best hospital for adult cancer is the University of *******************************, which had a score of *** out of 100, as of 2025. This statistic shows the top 10 hospitals for adult cancer in the United States based on the score given by U.S. News and World Report's annual hospital ranking.

According to a ranking by Statista and Newsweek, the best hospital in Sweden is the Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset in Stockholm. Moreover, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset was also ranked as the seventh-best hospital in the world, among over ****** hospitals in ** countries. Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset in Göteborg and Akademiska Sjukhuset in Uppsala were ranked as second and third best respectively in the Sweden, while they were **** and **** best respectively in the World.

Abstract

Different countries have different health outcomes that are in part due to the way respective health systems perform. Regardless of the type of health system, individuals will have health and non-health expectations in terms of how the institution responds to their needs. In many countries, however, health systems do not perform effectively and this is in part due to lack of information on health system performance, and on the different service providers.

The aim of the WHO World Health Survey is to provide empirical data to the national health information systems so that there is a better monitoring of health of the people, responsiveness of health systems and measurement of health-related parameters.

The overall aims of the survey is to examine the way populations report their health, understand how people value health states, measure the performance of health systems in relation to responsiveness and gather information on modes and extents of payment for health encounters through a nationally representative population based community survey. In addition, it addresses various areas such as health care expenditures, adult mortality, birth history, various risk factors, assessment of main chronic health conditions and the coverage of health interventions, in specific additional modules.

The objectives of the survey programme are to: 1. develop a means of providing valid, reliable and comparable information, at low cost, to supplement the information provided by routine health information systems. 2. build the evidence base necessary for policy-makers to monitor if health systems are achieving the desired goals, and to assess if additional investment in health is achieving the desired outcomes. 3. provide policy-makers with the evidence they need to adjust their policies, strategies and programmes as necessary.

Geographic coverage

The survey sampling frame must cover 100% of the country's eligible population, meaning that the entire national territory must be included. This does not mean that every province or territory need be represented in the survey sample but, rather, that all must have a chance (known probability) of being included in the survey sample.

There may be exceptional circumstances that preclude 100% national coverage. Certain areas in certain countries may be impossible to include due to reasons such as accessibility or conflict. All such exceptions must be discussed with WHO sampling experts. If any region must be excluded, it must constitute a coherent area, such as a particular province or region. For example if ¾ of region D in country X is not accessible due to war, the entire region D will be excluded from analysis.

Analysis unit

Households and individuals

Universe

The WHS will include all male and female adults (18 years of age and older) who are not out of the country during the survey period. It should be noted that this includes the population who may be institutionalized for health reasons at the time of the survey: all persons who would have fit the definition of household member at the time of their institutionalisation are included in the eligible population.

If the randomly selected individual is institutionalized short-term (e.g. a 3-day stay at a hospital) the interviewer must return to the household when the individual will have come back to interview him/her. If the randomly selected individual is institutionalized long term (e.g. has been in a nursing home the last 8 years), the interviewer must travel to that institution to interview him/her.

The target population includes any adult, male or female age 18 or over living in private households. Populations in group quarters, on military reservations, or in other non-household living arrangements will not be eligible for the study. People who are in an institution due to a health condition (such as a hospital, hospice, nursing home, home for the aged, etc.) at the time of the visit to the household are interviewed either in the institution or upon their return to their household if this is within a period of two weeks from the first visit to the household.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

SAMPLING GUIDELINES FOR WHS

Surveys in the WHS program must employ a probability sampling design. This means that every single individual in the sampling frame has a known and non-zero chance of being selected into the survey sample. While a Single Stage Random Sample is ideal if feasible, it is recognized that most sites will carry out Multi-stage Cluster Sampling.

The WHS sampling frame should cover 100% of the eligible population in the surveyed country. This means that every eligible person in the country has a chance of being included in the survey sample. It also means that particular ethnic groups or geographical areas may not be excluded from the sampling frame.

The sample size of the WHS in each country is 5000 persons (exceptions considered on a by-country basis). An adequate number of persons must be drawn from the sampling frame to account for an estimated amount of non-response (refusal to participate, empty houses etc.). The highest estimate of potential non-response and empty households should be used to ensure that the desired sample size is reached at the end of the survey period. This is very important because if, at the end of data collection, the required sample size of 5000 has not been reached additional persons must be selected randomly into the survey sample from the sampling frame. This is both costly and technically complicated (if this situation is to occur, consult WHO sampling experts for assistance), and best avoided by proper planning before data collection begins.

All steps of sampling, including justification for stratification, cluster sizes, probabilities of selection, weights at each stage of selection, and the computer program used for randomization must be communicated to WHO

STRATIFICATION

Stratification is the process by which the population is divided into subgroups. Sampling will then be conducted separately in each subgroup. Strata or subgroups are chosen because evidence is available that they are related to the outcome (e.g. health, responsiveness, mortality, coverage etc.). The strata chosen will vary by country and reflect local conditions. Some examples of factors that can be stratified on are geography (e.g. North, Central, South), level of urbanization (e.g. urban, rural), socio-economic zones, provinces (especially if health administration is primarily under the jurisdiction of provincial authorities), or presence of health facility in area. Strata to be used must be identified by each country and the reasons for selection explicitly justified.

Stratification is strongly recommended at the first stage of sampling. Once the strata have been chosen and justified, all stages of selection will be conducted separately in each stratum. We recommend stratifying on 3-5 factors. It is optimum to have half as many strata (note the difference between stratifying variables, which may be such variables as gender, socio-economic status, province/region etc. and strata, which are the combination of variable categories, for example Male, High socio-economic status, Xingtao Province would be a stratum).

Strata should be as homogenous as possible within and as heterogeneous as possible between. This means that strata should be formulated in such a way that individuals belonging to a stratum should be as similar to each other with respect to key variables as possible and as different as possible from individuals belonging to a different stratum. This maximises the efficiency of stratification in reducing sampling variance.

MULTI-STAGE CLUSTER SELECTION

A cluster is a naturally occurring unit or grouping within the population (e.g. enumeration areas, cities, universities, provinces, hospitals etc.); it is a unit for which the administrative level has clear, nonoverlapping boundaries. Cluster sampling is useful because it avoids having to compile exhaustive lists of every single person in the population. Clusters should be as heterogeneous as possible within and as homogenous as possible between (note that this is the opposite criterion as that for strata). Clusters should be as small as possible (i.e. large administrative units such as Provinces or States are not good clusters) but not so small as to be homogenous.

In cluster sampling, a number of clusters are randomly selected from a list of clusters. Then, either all members of the chosen cluster or a random selection from among them are included in the sample. Multistage sampling is an extension of cluster sampling where a hierarchy of clusters are chosen going from larger to smaller.

In order to carry out multi-stage sampling, one needs to know only the population sizes of the sampling units. For the smallest sampling unit above the elementary unit however, a complete list of all elementary units (households) is needed; in order to be able to randomly select among all households in the TSU, a list of all those households is required. This information may be available from the most recent population census. If the last census was >3 years ago or the information furnished by it was of poor quality or unreliable, the survey staff will have the task of enumerating all households in the smallest randomly selected sampling unit. It is very important to budget for this step if it is necessary and ensure that all households are properly enumerated in order that a representative sample is obtained.

It is always best to have as many clusters in the PSU as possible. The reason for this is that the fewer the number of respondents in each PSU, the lower will be the clustering effect which

The average for 2020 based on 36 countries was 4.44 hospital beds. The highest value was in South Korea: 12.65 hospital beds and the lowest value was in Mexico: 0.99 hospital beds. The indicator is available from 1960 to 2021. Below is a chart for all countries where data are available.

HCAHPS Hospital Ratings Survey

Patient Experience Ratings 2018-2020

By Health [source]

About this dataset

This dataset contains ratings of hospitals, based on the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS). This survey collects data from hospital patients on their experiences during an inpatient stay. The list includes several indicators to help gauge a hospital's quality, such as star ratings based on patient opinions and percentage of positive answers to HCAHPS questions. Additionally, there are measures such as the number of completed surveys, survey response rate percent and linear mean value which assist in evaluating patient experience at each medical institution. With this comprehensive dataset you can easily draw comparisons between hospitals and make informed decisions about healthcare services provided in your area

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

This dataset provides useful information on the quality of care that hospitals provide. This dataset provides ratings and reviews of several hospitals, making it easy to compare hospitals in order to find out which hospital may best meet your needs.

The following guide will walk you through how to use this dataset effectively:

• Navigate the different columns available in this dataset by scrolling through the table. These include Hospital Name, Address, City, State, ZIP Code, County Name, Phone Number and HCAHPS Question among others.
• Examine important information such as the patient survey star rating and HCAHPS linear mean value for each hospital included in the dataset in order to evaluate it's performance against other hospitals based on standards set out by HCAHPS .
• Read any footnotes associated with each column carefully in order to fully understand what exactly is being measured. These may directly affect your evaluation of a particular hospital’s performance compared to others included in this dataset or even more so when compared against external sources of data outside this dataset such as other surveys or studies related to health care quality measurement metrics within that state or region where applicable & relevant (i..e Measure Start Date and Measure End Date).

• Pay careful attention also when evaluating factors related to survey response rates (e..g Survey Response Rate Percent Footnote) & what percentages are being reported here within each category; these figures may selectively bias results so ensure full transparency is achieved by reviewing all potential influencing factors/variables prior commencing investigations/data analysis/interpretation based upon this data-set alone(or any subset thereof).

  By following these steps you should be able set up your own criteria for measuring various aspects of health care quality across different states & cities - ensuring optimal access & safety measures for both patients & healthcare providers alike over time - thus ultimately aiding decision making processes towards improved patient outcomes worldwide!

Research Ideas

• Tracking patient experience trends over time: This dataset can be used to analyze trends in patient experience over time by identifying changes in survey responses, star ratings, and response rates across hospitals.
• Establishing a benchmark for high-quality hospital care: By studying the scores of the top-performing hospitals within each category, healthcare administrators can set standards and benchmarks for quality of care in their own hospitals.
• Comparing hospital ratings to inform decision making: Patients and family members looking to book an appointment at a hospital or doctors office can use this dataset to compare different facilities’ HCAHPS scores and make an informed decision about where they would like to go for their medical treatment

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

License: Dataset copyright by authors - You are free to: - Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. - Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. - You must: - Give appropriate credit - Provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. - ShareAlike - You must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. - **Keep int...

According to a ranking by Statista and Newsweek, the best hospital in Denmark is the Rigshospitalet - København in Copenhagen. Moreover, the Rigshospitalet - København was also ranked as the **** best hospital in the world, among over ****** hospitals in ** countries. Aarhus Universitetshospital in Aarhus and Odense Universitetshospital in Odense were ranked as second and third best respectively in the Denmark, while they were **** and **** best respectively in the World.

Success.ai’s Healthcare Professionals Data for Healthcare & Hospital Executives in Europe provides a reliable and comprehensive dataset tailored for businesses aiming to connect with decision-makers in the European healthcare and hospital sectors. Covering healthcare executives, hospital administrators, and medical directors, this dataset offers verified contact details, professional insights, and leadership profiles.

With access to over 700 million verified global profiles and data from 70 million businesses, Success.ai ensures your outreach, market research, and partnership strategies are powered by accurate, continuously updated, and GDPR-compliant data. Backed by our Best Price Guarantee, this solution is indispensable for navigating and thriving in Europe’s healthcare industry.

Why Choose Success.ai’s Healthcare Professionals Data?

1. Verified Contact Data for Targeted Engagement

   • Access verified work emails, phone numbers, and LinkedIn profiles of healthcare executives, hospital administrators, and medical directors.
   • AI-driven validation ensures 99% accuracy, reducing data gaps and improving communication effectiveness.

2. Comprehensive Coverage of European Healthcare Professionals

   • Includes profiles of professionals from top hospitals, healthcare organizations, and medical institutions across Europe.
   • Gain insights into regional healthcare trends, operational challenges, and emerging technologies.

3. Continuously Updated Datasets

   • Real-time updates capture changes in leadership roles, organizational structures, and market dynamics.
   • Stay aligned with the fast-evolving healthcare landscape to identify emerging opportunities.

4. Ethical and Compliant

   • Fully adheres to GDPR, CCPA, and other global data privacy regulations, ensuring responsible and lawful data usage.

Data Highlights:

• 700M+ Verified Global Profiles: Connect with healthcare professionals and decision-makers in Europe’s hospital and healthcare sectors.
• 70M+ Business Profiles: Access detailed firmographic data, including hospital sizes, revenue ranges, and geographic footprints.
• Leadership Insights: Engage with CEOs, medical directors, and administrative leaders shaping healthcare strategies.
• Regional Healthcare Trends: Understand trends in digital healthcare adoption, operational efficiency, and patient care management.

Key Features of the Dataset:

1. Comprehensive Professional Profiles

   • Identify and connect with key players, including hospital executives, medical directors, and department heads in the healthcare industry.
   • Access data on professional histories, certifications, and areas of expertise for precise targeting.

2. Advanced Filters for Precision Campaigns

   • Filter professionals by hospital size, geographic location, or job function (administrative, medical, or operational).
   • Tailor campaigns to align with specific needs such as digital transformation, patient care solutions, or regulatory compliance.

3. Healthcare Industry Insights

   • Leverage data on operational trends, hospital management practices, and regional healthcare needs.
   • Refine product offerings and outreach strategies to address pressing challenges in the European healthcare market.

4. AI-Driven Enrichment

   • Profiles enriched with actionable data allow for personalized messaging, highlight unique value propositions, and improve engagement outcomes with healthcare professionals.

Strategic Use Cases:

1. Marketing and Outreach to Healthcare Executives

   • Promote healthcare IT solutions, medical devices, or operational efficiency tools to executives managing hospitals and clinics.
   • Use verified contact data for multi-channel outreach, including email, phone, and digital marketing.

2. Partnership Development and Collaboration

   • Build relationships with hospitals, healthcare providers, and medical institutions exploring strategic partnerships or new technology adoption.
   • Foster alliances that drive patient care improvements, cost savings, or operational efficiency.

3. Market Research and Competitive Analysis

   • Analyze trends in European healthcare to refine product development, marketing strategies, and engagement plans.
   • Benchmark against competitors to identify growth opportunities, underserved segments, and innovative solutions.

4. Recruitment and Workforce Solutions

   • Target HR professionals and hiring managers in healthcare institutions recruiting for administrative, medical, or operational roles.
   • Provide workforce optimization platforms, training solutions, or staffing services tailored to the healthcare sector.

Why Choose Success.ai?

1. Best Price Guarantee

   • Access premium-quality healthcare professional data at competitive prices, ensuring strong ROI for your marketing, sales, and strategic initiatives.

2. Seamless Integration
   ...

Health Facility General Information

Art 28, 36 & 40 Accredited Facilities & Programs

By Health Data New York [source]

About this dataset

This dataset contains the locations of Article 28, Article 36 and Article 40 health care facilities and programs from the Health Facilities Information System (HFIS), including hospitals, nursing homes, certified home health care agencies, hospices and diagnostic treatment centers. These facilities are fundamental to providing necessary medical services throughout the state and it is up to local governments to properly track them.

In this dataset you will find information such as facility name, short description, address information for both the operator and cooperator (as applicable), zip codes for each location, a unique certificate number issued by HFIS for each facility or program, latitude/longitude coordinates for each location as well as the type of ownership of that facility. All of this data helps ensure that people can access essential medical services in their area quickly and easily.

So no matter what type of medical service you are looking for or which locality within New York State you're located in, you can use this insight-backed dataset to understand where these important services are located near you! Before using the data provided be sure to download and read through our Terms of Service for an understanding of proper usage requirements

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

This dataset can be used to provide information about the location of Article 28, Article 36 and Article 40 health care facilities and programs. This data provides information about each health facility, such as its name, address, phone number, website, type of ownership and more. With this data you can easily explore which health care facilities are available in your area or around the world.

To get started with this dataset there are a few simple steps you need to take: - Read through the Terms of Service: Be sure to read through all terms before using this dataset as it sets out what is allowed and not allowed when using it. - View the Column Labels: This will help you understand which columns best correspond with any searches or analysis that you want to do on this data set - Conduct Your Search/Analysis: Once you've determined which columns best match your query begin running your own searches/analysis on the Health Facilities Information System (HFIS). - Filter for Relevant Datapoints: Utilize filters if needed to narrow down specific datapoints that are relevant for your search/analysis 5 Enjoy Your Results!: Enjoy exploring all of the results of your analysis

Research Ideas

• Create an interactive map to show the distribution of health facilities and programs across different states, cities and regions.
• Analyze the data to identify areas with increased or decreased need for certain types of health care services and develop appropriate strategies for service improvisation in these areas.
• Use customer feedback from patient surveys to compare facilities based on their performance in providing quality healthcare services including cost efficiency and patient satisfaction rates, in order to improve the overall standards of care within these establishments

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

See the dataset description for more information.

Columns

File: health-facility-general-information-1.csv | Column name | Description | |:---------------------------------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------| | Facility Name | Name of the health care facility or program. (String) | | Short Description | A brief description of the facility or program. (String) | | Facility Open Date | The date the facility or program opened. (Date) | | Facility Address 1 | The first line of the facility's address. (String) | | Facility Address 2 | The second line of the facility's address. (String) | | Facility City | The city the facility is located in. (String) | | Facility State | The state the facility is located in. (String) | | Facility Zip Code | The zip code of the facility. (String) ...

According to a ranking by Statista and Newsweek, the best hospital in Norway is Oslo Universitetssykehus in Oslo. Moreover, Oslo Universitetssykehus was also ranked as the **** best hospital in the world, among over ****** hospitals in ** countries. St. Olavs Hospital in Trondheim and Haukeland Universitetssykehus in Bergen were ranked as second and third best respectively in the Norway, while they were ***** and ***** best respectively in the World.

South Korea Number of Hospital was up 3.5% in 2019, compared to the previous year.

VHA hospitals Timely Care Data

Performance on Clinical Measures and Processes of Care

By US Open Data Portal, data.gov [source]

About this dataset

This dataset provides an inside look at the performance of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals on timely and effective care measures. It contains detailed information such as hospital names, addresses, census-designated cities and locations, states, ZIP codes county names, phone numbers and associated conditions. Additionally, each entry includes a score, sample size and any notes or footnotes to give further context. This data is collected through either Quality Improvement Organizations for external peer review programs as well as direct electronic medical records. By understanding these performance scores of VHA hospitals on timely care measures we can gain valuable insights into how VA healthcare services are delivering values throughout the country!

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

This dataset contains information about the performance of Veterans Health Administration hospitals on timely and effective care measures. In this dataset, you can find the hospital name, address, city, state, ZIP code, county name, phone number associated with each hospital as well as data related to the timely and effective care measure such as conditions being measured and their associated scores.

To use this dataset effectively, we recommend first focusing on identifying an area of interest for analysis. For example: what condition is most impacting wait times for patients? Once that has been identified you can narrow down which fields would best fit your needs - for example if you are studying wait times then “Score” may be more valuable to filter than Footnote. Additionally consider using aggregation functions over certain fields (like average score over time) in order to get a better understanding of overall performance by factor--for instance Location.

Ultimately this dataset provides a snapshot into how Veteran's Health Administration hospitals are performing on timely and effective care measures so any research should focus around that aspect of healthcare delivery

Research Ideas

• Analyzing and predicting hospital performance on a regional level to improve the quality of healthcare for veterans across the country.
• Using this dataset to identify trends and develop strategies for hospitals that consistently score low on timely and effective care measures, with the goal of improving patient outcomes.
• Comparison analysis between different VHA hospitals to discover patterns and best practices in providing effective care so they can be shared with other hospitals in the system

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

License: Dataset copyright by authors - You are free to: - Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. - Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. - You must: - Give appropriate credit - Provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. - ShareAlike - You must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. - Keep intact - all notices that refer to this license, including copyright notices.

Columns

File: csv-1.csv | Column name | Description | |:-----------------------|:-------------------------------------------------------------| | Hospital Name | Name of the VHA hospital. (String) | | Address | Street address of the VHA hospital. (String) | | City | City where the VHA hospital is located. (String) | | State | State where the VHA hospital is located. (String) | | ZIP Code | ZIP code of the VHA hospital. (Integer) | | County Name | County where the VHA hospital is located. (String) | | Phone Number | Phone number of the VHA hospital. (String) | | Condition | Condition being measured. (String) | | Measure Name | Measure used to measure the condition. (String) | | Score | Score achieved by the VHA h...

Context

In order to begin correlating global data based around infection rates, from the WHO data in the UNCOVER: Covid-19 challenge, found here, to quality of healthcare in a region, data relaying the availability of health care in nations around the globe is necessary as a first step to this analysis. Out of a general desire to provide this data to the data science community, and out of a desire to find ways to learn about, prepare for in whatever way possible, and beat, the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020, I'm making this data-set public for others to use, share, and study with.

Content

The data presented in the file below cover the following information... 1 set of Strings --> The country names 1 set of Integers --> The years in which the data were recorded (2010-2014). 6 sets of floats --> 6 columns of floats record the total density of health centers and hospitals (including provincial and specialized) to every 100,000 people within the country... thus generalizing the country's access to health care, and maintenance/creation of the health infrastructure needed to support the population.

Acknowledgements

Complete thanks for this data-set goes to the World Health Organization and the Global Health Observatory. This data can be found on the GHO's site, specifically here. In terms of the licensing, in order to underscore that this data is not mine, as well as ensure all steps are taken to make one's proper rights clear (and grant thanks for the data once again), the general data usage license agreement for the data-set used can be found here.

Inspiration

It is sadly true that this data on its own is unlikely to present any major answers. When combined with other datasets however, this may yield answers as to what factors of a countries existence may indicate its ability to maintain a large health infrastructure. In fact, determining how a country's finances, natural resource list (as just ideas), etc. relate to a country's ability to sustain a decent health infrastructure would be an extremely interesting question to answer. I hope you may find the data helpful in your endeavors!

Disclaimer: This is my first ever published data-set on Kaggle. While I've done my best to ensure it's fairly descriptive for any potential visitors, please do feel free to leave any comments you may have in the discussions section! I'm always open to finding ways to improve.

US Healthcare Readmissions and Mortality

Evaluating Hospital Performance

By Health [source]

About this dataset

This dataset contains detailed information about 30-day readmission and mortality rates of U.S. hospitals. It is an essential tool for stakeholders aiming to identify opportunities for improving healthcare quality and performance across the country. Providers benefit by having access to comprehensive data regarding readmission, mortality rate, score, measure start/end dates, compared average to national as well as other pertinent metrics like zip codes, phone numbers and county names. Use this data set to conduct evaluations of how hospitals are meeting industry standards from a quality and outcomes perspective in order to make more informed decisions when designing patient care strategies and policies

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

This dataset provides data on 30-day readmission and mortality rates of U.S. hospitals, useful in understanding the quality of healthcare being provided. This data can provide insight into the effectiveness of treatments, patient care, and staff performance at different healthcare facilities throughout the country.

In order to use this dataset effectively, it is important to understand each column and how best to interpret them. The ‘Hospital Name’ column displays the name of the facility; ‘Address’ lists a street address for the hospital; ‘City’ indicates its geographic location; ‘State’ specifies a two-letter abbreviation for that state; ‘ZIP Code’ provides each facility's 5 digit zip code address; 'County Name' specifies what county that particular hospital resides in; 'Phone number' lists a phone contact for any given facility ;'Measure Name' identifies which measure is being recorded (for instance: Elective Delivery Before 39 Weeks); 'Score' value reflects an average score based on patient feedback surveys taken over time frame listed under ' Measure Start Date.' Then there are also columns tracking both lower estimates ('Lower Estimate') as well as higher estimates ('Higher Estimate'); these create variability that can be tracked by researchers seeking further answers or formulating future studies on this topic or field.; Lastly there is one more measure oissociated with this set: ' Footnote,' which may highlight any addional important details pertinent to analysis such as numbers outlying National averages etc..

This data set can be used by hospitals, research facilities and other interested parties in providing inciteful information when making decisions about patient care standards throughout America . It can help find patterns about readmitis/mortality along county lines or answer questions about preformance fluctuations between different hospital locations over an extended amount of time. So if you are ever curious about 30 days readmitted within US Hospitals don't hesitate to dive into this insightful dataset!

Research Ideas

• Comparing hospitals on a regional or national basis to measure the quality of care provided for readmission and mortality rates.
• Analyzing the effects of technological advancements such as telemedicine, virtual visits, and AI on readmission and mortality rates at different hospitals.
• Using measures such as Lower Estimate Higher Estimate scores to identify systematic problems in readmissions or mortality rate management at hospitals and informing public health care policy

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

License: Dataset copyright by authors - You are free to: - Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. - Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. - You must: - Give appropriate credit - Provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. - ShareAlike - You must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. - Keep intact - all notices that refer to this license, including copyright notices.

Columns

File: Readmissions_and_Deaths_-_Hospital.csv | Column name | Description | |:-------------------------|:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Hospital Name ...

This dataset provides values for HOSPITAL BEDS reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

Success.ai’s Healthcare Industry Leads Data empowers businesses and organizations to connect with key decision-makers and stakeholders in the global healthcare and pharmaceutical sectors. Leveraging over 170 million verified professional profiles and 30 million company profiles, this dataset includes detailed contact information, firmographic insights, and leadership data for hospitals, clinics, biotech firms, medical device manufacturers, pharmaceuticals, and other healthcare-related enterprises. Whether your goal is to pitch a new medical technology, partner with healthcare providers, or conduct market research, Success.ai ensures that your outreach and strategic planning are guided by reliable, continuously updated, and AI-validated data.

Why Choose Success.ai’s Healthcare Industry Leads Data?

1. Comprehensive Contact Information

   • Access verified work emails, phone numbers, and LinkedIn profiles of healthcare administrators, pharmaceutical executives, R&D directors, procurement officers, and medical staff.
   • AI-driven validation ensures 99% accuracy, reducing wasted efforts and fostering efficient communication.

2. Global Reach Across Healthcare Segments

   • Includes profiles from hospitals, private clinics, pharmaceutical companies, biotech startups, research institutions, and medical supply chain partners.
   • Covers North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and the Middle East, enabling a global perspective on healthcare systems and opportunities.

3. Continuously Updated Datasets

   • Real-time updates reflect leadership changes, organizational shifts, and emerging trends in patient care, medical innovation, and regulatory compliance.

4. Ethical and Compliant

   • Adheres to GDPR, CCPA, and other global data privacy regulations, ensuring your data usage respects legal standards and patient confidentiality norms.

Data Highlights:

• 170M+ Verified Professional Profiles: Connect with healthcare and pharmaceutical professionals, decision-makers, and influencers worldwide.
• 50M Work Emails: AI-validated for direct, accurate communication and reduced bounce rates.
• 30M Company Profiles: Gain insights into organizational structures, operational scales, and specialization areas.
• 700M Global Professional Profiles: Enriched datasets to support market analysis, product development, and strategic planning.

Key Features of the Dataset:

1. Healthcare Decision-Maker Profiles

   • Identify and engage with CEOs, CIOs, CFOs, chief medical officers, hospital administrators, clinical directors, and procurement specialists.
   • Target professionals who influence equipment purchases, medical supply chain decisions, drug trial approvals, and healthcare delivery models.

2. Detailed Business Profiles

   • Access firmographic data, including company sizes, revenue ranges, key markets, and service lines for a holistic understanding of target organizations.
   • Leverage comprehensive insights to position your products, services, or solutions as tailored fits for specific operational needs.

3. Advanced Filters for Precision Targeting

   • Filter by region, specialty (oncology, cardiology, diagnostics, etc.), hospital size, pharmaceutical focus, or research areas.
   • Align campaigns with unique healthcare demands, reimbursement models, and regulatory environments.

4. AI-Driven Enrichment

   • Profiles enriched with actionable data enable personalized messaging, highlight value propositions, and enhance engagement outcomes with healthcare stakeholders.

Strategic Use Cases:

1. Sales and Business Development

   • Present medical devices, pharma products, or healthcare IT solutions to hospital administrators, chief medical officers, and procurement managers.
   • Build relationships with decision-makers who oversee budgeting, supplier selection, and patient care initiatives.

2. Market Research and Product Innovation

   • Analyze trends in patient treatments, drug pipelines, and healthcare infrastructure to inform R&D and product roadmaps.
   • Identify emerging specialties, new treatment modalities, and growth markets to focus marketing, sales, and investment efforts.

3. Strategic Partnerships and Alliances

   • Connect with R&D directors, biotech executives, or hospital groups to explore collaborations, clinical trials, and joint ventures.
   • Foster partnerships that accelerate product development, enhance patient outcomes, and drive long-term competitiveness.

4. Recruitment and Talent Acquisition

   • Target HR professionals and department heads seeking qualified medical staff, researchers, pharmaceutical reps, and administrative personnel.
   • Offer staffing, training, or professional development services to healthcare institutions aiming to improve service delivery and compliance.

Why Choose Success.ai?

1. Best Price Guarantee
   • Access high-quality, verified data at...

According to a ranking by Statista and Newsweek, the best hospital in Finland is Helsinki University Hospital in Helsinki. Moreover, Helsinki University Hospital was also ranked as the **** best hospital in the world, among over ****** hospitals in ** countries. Tampere University Hospital in Tampere and Turku University Hospital in Turku were ranked as second and third best respectively in the Finland, while they were ***** and ***** best respectively in the World.

Hospital Infection Surveillance Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global hospital infection surveillance market size reached USD 1.45 billion in 2024, demonstrating a robust momentum driven by the increasing prevalence of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and the urgent demand for advanced surveillance systems. The market is projected to grow at a CAGR of 13.8% during the forecast period, reaching an estimated USD 4.02 billion by 2033. This growth is largely fueled by the ongoing digital transformation in healthcare, stringent regulatory mandates, and a heightened focus on patient safety and infection prevention.

One of the primary growth factors for the hospital infection surveillance market is the rising incidence of HAIs worldwide. Healthcare-associated infections remain a significant burden, leading to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Hospitals and healthcare facilities are under mounting pressure to adopt sophisticated surveillance solutions that enable early detection, monitoring, and prevention of infections. The adoption of electronic health records and integration of surveillance software with hospital information systems have further accelerated this trend, allowing for real-time data analysis and more effective infection control measures. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the importance of robust infection surveillance, prompting healthcare providers to invest in advanced technologies to safeguard both patients and staff.

Technological advancements play a pivotal role in shaping the hospital infection surveillance market. The integration of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data analytics into surveillance platforms has significantly enhanced the ability to identify infection patterns and predict outbreaks. These innovations facilitate automated alerts, comprehensive reporting, and tailored infection control interventions, thereby improving patient outcomes and operational efficiency. Moreover, the increasing interoperability of surveillance systems with other hospital management platforms ensures seamless data exchange and a holistic approach to infection prevention. The growing trend towards cloud-based solutions also enables remote monitoring and scalability, making sophisticated surveillance tools accessible to a broader range of healthcare facilities, including small and medium-sized hospitals.

Another critical driver is the tightening of regulatory frameworks and accreditation standards related to infection control. Governments and healthcare organizations across the globe are enforcing stricter guidelines to minimize HAIs, compelling hospitals to implement standardized surveillance protocols. Agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have established comprehensive reporting requirements and best practices for infection surveillance. Compliance with these regulations not only ensures patient safety but also protects healthcare institutions from legal liabilities and financial penalties. As a result, demand for hospital infection surveillance solutions is expected to remain strong, with market players continuously innovating to meet evolving regulatory expectations.

From a regional perspective, North America currently dominates the hospital infection surveillance market, accounting for the largest share in 2024, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. The high adoption rate of digital health technologies, well-established healthcare infrastructure, and favorable government initiatives contribute to the regionÂ’s leadership. Meanwhile, Asia Pacific is experiencing the fastest growth, driven by rising healthcare investments, expanding hospital networks, and increasing awareness of infection control. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also witnessing steady progress, albeit at a slower pace, as healthcare systems in these regions gradually modernize and prioritize infection prevention.

Surgical Site Infection Control is a critical aspect of hospital infection surveillance, particularly given the significant impact these infections have on patient outcomes and healthcare costs. Effective control measures involve a comprehensive approach that includes preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative strategies to minimize the risk o