9 datasets found
  1. Coral Sea Sentinel 2 Marine Satellite Composite Draft Imagery version 0...

    • devweb.dga.links.com.au
    • researchdata.edu.au
    • +1more
    png
    Updated Mar 13, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere (2025). Coral Sea Sentinel 2 Marine Satellite Composite Draft Imagery version 0 (AIMS) [Dataset]. https://devweb.dga.links.com.au/data/dataset/coral-sea-sentinel-2-marine-satellite-composite-draft-imagery-version-0-aims
    Explore at:
    pngAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 13, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    CSIROhttp://www.csiro.au/
    Authors
    CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere
    Description

    This dataset contains composite satellite images for the Coral Sea region based on 10 m resolution Sentinel 2 imagery from 2015 – 2021. This image collection is intended to allow mapping of the reef and island features of the Coral Sea. This is a draft version of the dataset prepared from approximately 60% of the available Sentinel 2 image. An improved version of this dataset was released https://doi.org/10.26274/NH77-ZW79. This collection contains composite imagery for 31 Sentinel 2 tiles in the Coral Sea. For each tile there are 5 different colour and contrast enhancement styles intended to highlight different features. These include: - DeepFalse - Bands: B1 (ultraviolet), B2 (blue), B3 (green): False colour image that shows deep marine features to 50 - 60 m depth. This imagery exploits the clear waters of the Coral Sea to allow the ultraviolet band to provide a much deeper view of coral reefs than is typically achievable with true colour imagery. This technique doesn't work where the water is not as clear as the ultraviolet get scattered easily. - DeepMarine - Bands: B2 (blue), B3 (green), B4 (red): This is a contrast enhanced version of the true colour imagery, focusing on being able to better see the deeper features. Shallow features are over exposed due to the increased contrast. - ReefTop - Bands: B3 (red): This imagery is contrast enhanced to create an mask (black and white) of reef tops, delineating areas that are shallower or deeper than approximately 4 - 5 m. This mask is intended to assist in the creating of a GIS layer equivalent to the 'GBR Dry Reefs' dataset. The depth mapping exploits the limited water penetration of the red channel. In clear water the red channel can only see features to approximately 6 m regardless of the substrate type. - Shallow - Bands: B5 (red edge), B8 (Near Infrared) , B11 (Short Wave infrared): This false colour imagery focuses on identifying very shallow and dry regions in the imagery. It exploits the property that the longer wavelength bands progressively penetrate the water less. B5 penetrates the water approximately 3 - 5 m, B8 approximately 0.5 m and B11 < 0.1 m. Feature less than a couple of metres appear dark blue, dry areas are white. - TrueColour - Bands: B2 (blue), B3 (green), B4 (red): True colour imagery. This is useful to interpreting what shallow features are and in mapping the vegetation on cays and identifying beach rock. For most Sentinel tiles there are two versions of the DeepFalse and DeepMarine imagery based on different collections (dates). The R1 imagery are composites made up from the best available imagery while the R2 imagery uses the next best set of imagery. This splitting of the imagery is to allow two composites to be created from the pool of available imagery so that mapped features could be checked against two images. Typically the R2 imagery will have more artefacts from clouds. The satellite imagery was processed in tiles (approximately 100 x 100 km) to keep each final image small enough to manage. The dataset only covers the portion of the Coral Sea where there are shallow coral reefs. Methods: The satellite image composites were created by combining multiple Sentinel 2 images using the Google Earth Engine. The core algorithm was: 1. For each Sentinel 2 tile, the set of Sentinel images from 2015 – 2021 were reviewed manually. In some tiles the cloud cover threshold was raised to gather more images, particularly if there were less than 20 images available. The Google Earth Engine image IDs of the best images were recorded. These were the images with the clearest water, lowest waves, lowest cloud, and lowest sun glint. 2. A composite image was created from the best images by taking the statistical median of the stack of images selected in the previous stage, after masking out clouds and their shadows (described in detail later). 3. The contrast of the images was enhanced to create a series of products for different uses. The true colour image retained the full range of tones visible, so that bright sand cays still retained some detail. The marine enhanced version stretched the blue, green and red channels so that they focused on the deeper, darker marine features. This stretching was done to ensure that when converted to 8-bit colour imagery that all the dark detail in the deeper areas were visible. This contrast enhancement resulted in bright areas of the imagery clipping, leading to loss of detail in shallow reef areas and colours of land areas looking off. A reef top estimate was produced from the red channel (B4) where the contrast was stretched so that the imagery contains almost a binary mask. The threshold was chosen to approximate the 5 m depth contour for the clear waters of the Coral Sea. Lastly a false colour image was produced to allow mapping of shallow water features such as cays and islands. This image was produced from B5 (far red), B8 (nir), B11 (nir), where blue represents depths from approximately 0.5 – 5 m, green areas with 0 – 0.5 m depth, and brown and white corresponding to dry land. 4. The various contrast enhanced composite images were exported from Google Earth Engine (default of 32 bit GeoTiff) and reprocessed to smaller LZW compresed 8 bit GeoTiff images GDAL. Cloud Masking Prior to combining the best images each image was processed to mask out clouds and their shadows. The cloud masking uses the COPERNICUS/S2_CLOUD_PROBABILITY dataset developed by SentinelHub (Google, n.d.; Zupanc, 2017). The mask includes the cloud areas, plus a mask to remove cloud shadows. The cloud shadows were estimated by projecting the cloud mask in the direction opposite the angle to the sun. The shadow distance was estimated in two parts. A low cloud mask was created based on the assumption that small clouds have a small shadow distance. These were detected using a 40% cloud probability threshold. These were projected over 400 m, followed by a 150 m buffer to expand the final mask. A high cloud mask was created to cover longer shadows created by taller, larger clouds. These clouds were detected based on an 80% cloud probability threshold, followed by an erosion and dilation of 300 m to remove small clouds. These were then projected over a 1.5 km distance followed by a 300 m buffer. The parameters for the cloud masking (probability threshold, projection distance and buffer radius) were determined through trial and error on a small number of scenes. As such there are probably significant potential improvements that could be made to this algorithm. Erosion, dilation and buffer operations were performed at a lower image resolution than the native satellite image resolution to improve the computational speed. The resolution of these operations were adjusted so that they were performed with approximately a 4 pixel resolution during these operations. This made the cloud mask significantly more spatially coarse than the 10 m Sentinel imagery. This resolution was chosen as a trade-off between the coarseness of the mask verse the processing time for these operations. With 4-pixel filter resolutions these operations were still using over 90% of the total processing resulting in each image taking approximately 10 min to compute on the Google Earth Engine. Sun glint removal and atmospheric correction. Sun glint was removed from the images using the infrared B8 band to estimate the reflection off the water from the sun glint. B8 penetrates water less than 0.5 m and so in water areas it only detects reflections off the surface of the water. The sun glint detected by B8 correlates very highly with the sun glint experienced by the ultra violet and visible channels (B1, B2, B3 and B4) and so the sun glint in these channels can be removed by subtracting B8 from these channels. This simple sun glint correction fails in very shallow and land areas. On land areas B8 is very bright and thus subtracting it from the other channels results in black land. In shallow areas (< 0.5 m) the B8 channel detects the substrate, resulting in too much sun glint correction. To resolve these issues the sun glint correction was adjusted by transitioning to B11 for shallow areas as it penetrates the water even less than B8. We don't use B11 everywhere because it is half the resolution of B8. Land areas need their tonal levels to be adjusted to match the water areas after sun glint correction. Ideally this would be achieved using an atmospheric correction that compensates for the contrast loss due to haze in the atmosphere. Complex models for atmospheric correction involve considering the elevation of the surface (higher areas have less atmosphere to pass through) and the weather conditions. Since this dataset is focused on coral reef areas, elevation compensation is unnecessary due to the very low and flat land features being imaged. Additionally the focus of the dataset it on marine features and so only a basic atmospheric correction is needed. Land areas (as determined by very bright B8 areas) where assigned a fixed smaller correction factor to approximate atmospheric correction. This fixed atmospheric correction was determined iteratively so that land areas matched the tonal value of shallow and water areas. Image selection Available Sentinel 2 images with a cloud cover of less than 0.5% were manually reviewed using an Google Earth Engine App 01-select-sentinel2-images.js. Where there were few images available (less than 30 images) the cloud cover threshold was raised to increase the set of images that were raised. Images were excluded from the composites primarily due to two main factors: sun glint and fine scattered clouds. The images were excluded if there was any significant uncorrected sun glint in the image, i.e. the brightness of the sun glint exceeded the sun glint correction. Fine scattered clouds over reef areas were also a strong factor in down grading the quality rating of the image. As each satellite images were reviewed they were

  2. d

    Communication towers across the greater sage-grouse range

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.usgs.gov
    Updated Aug 25, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (2024). Communication towers across the greater sage-grouse range [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/communication-towers-across-the-greater-sage-grouse-range
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 25, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Description

    We compiled and verified a dataset which represents a comprehensive inventory of communication tower infrastructure across the range of the greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) from 1990 to 2023. Our dataset is an annual spatial time series product that allows users to visualize, assess, and analyze tower locations and duration (i.e., including date of construction through date of dismantlement) on western landscapes within the sagebrush ecosystem. Tower data were acquired from four publicly available infrastructure databases, data records were filtered to only include communication tower structures within the spatial extent of interest. Data records were then validated and checked for accuracy using Google Earth. The filtered dataset comprises 3,272 tower site locations verified via satellite imagery or field visits, and a further 799 tower site unverified records.

  3. Landsat 5 Satellite Imagery for selected areas of Great Barrier Reef and...

    • devweb.dga.links.com.au
    • catalogue.eatlas.org.au
    • +2more
    html, png, zip
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere (2025). Landsat 5 Satellite Imagery for selected areas of Great Barrier Reef and Torres Strait (NERP TE 13.1, eAtlas AIMS, source: NASA) [Dataset]. https://devweb.dga.links.com.au/data/dataset/landsat-5-satellite-imagery-for-selected-areas-of-great-barrier-reef-and-torres-strait-nerp-te-
    Explore at:
    zip, png, htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    CSIROhttp://www.csiro.au/
    Authors
    CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere
    Area covered
    Great Barrier Reef, Torres Strait
    Description

    This dataset contains Landsat 5 imagery for selected areas of Queensland, currently Torres Strait and around Lizard Island and Cape Tribulation. This collection was made as a result of the development of the Torres Strait Features dataset. It includes a number (typically 4 - 8) of selected Landsat images for each scene from the entire Landsat 5 archive. These images were selected for having low cloud cover and clear water. The aim of this collection was to allow investigation of the marine features. The complete catalogue of Landsat 5 for scenes 96_70, 96_71, 97_67, 97_68, 98_66, 98_67, 98_68_99_66, 99_67 and 99_68 were downloaded from the Google Earth Engine site ( https://console.developers.google.com/storage/earthengine-public/landsat/ ). The images were then processed into low resolution true colour using GDAL. They were then reviewed for picture clarity and the best ones were selected and processed at full resolution to be part of this collection. The true colour conversion was achieved by applying level adjustment to each channel to ensure that the tonal scaling of each channel was adjusted to give a good overall colour balance. This effectively set the black point of the channel and the gain. This adjustment was applied consistently to all images.

    Red: Channel B3, Black level 8, White level 58 Green: Channel B2, Black level 10, White level 55 Blue: Channel B1, Black level 32, White level 121

    Note: A constant level adjustment was made to the images regardless of the time of the year that the images were taken. As a result images in the summer tend to be brighter than those in the winter. After level adjustment the three channels were merged into a single colour image using gdal_merge. The black surround on the image was then made transparent using the GDAL nearblack command. This collection consists of 59 images saved as 4 channel (Red, Green, Blue, Alpha) GeoTiff images with LZW compression (lossless) and internal overviews with a WGS 84 UTM 54N projection. Each of the individual images can be downloaded from the eAtlas map client (Overlay layers: eAtlas/Imagery Base Maps Earth Cover/Landsat 5) or as a collection of all images for each scene. Data Location: This dataset is filed in the eAtlas enduring data repository at: data\NERP-TE\13.1_eAtlas\QLD_NERP-TE-13-1_eAtlas_Landsat-5_1988-2011

  4. NCCN landscape change monitoring polygons in and around Mount Rainier, North...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Apr 25, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Park Service (2025). NCCN landscape change monitoring polygons in and around Mount Rainier, North Cascades, and Olympic National Parks for 1987-2017 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/nccn-landscape-change-monitoring-polygons-in-and-around-mount-rainier-north-cascades-1987--da1c0
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 25, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Park Servicehttp://www.nps.gov/
    Area covered
    Cascade Range, Mount Rainier
    Description

    As part of Vital Signs Monitoring, the North Coast and Cascades Network (NCCN) of the National Park Service (NPS) developed a protocol for monitoring landscape change using Landsat satellite imagery. The protocol was implemented at Mount Rainier (MORA) in 2013, North Cascades (NOCA) 2012, and Olympic National Parks (OLYM) in 2014 using LandTrendr (Landsat-based Detection of Trends in Disturbance and Recovery) algorithms developed by the Environmental Monitoring, Analysis, and Process Recognition Lab (eMapR) (formerly the Laboratory for Applications of Remote Sensing in Ecology (LARSE)) at Oregon State University. The dataset was generated by running LandTrendr in Google Earth Engine for the period from 1987 to 2017 and then aggregating disturbance pixels for a given year into patches based on adjacency rules and minimum mapping unit of 0.8 hectares (2 acres). Disturbance patches were then reviewed and human labeled using ten categories of landscape change. Eight categories were mapped at MORA and NOCA: Avalanche, Blowdown, Clearing, Defoliation, Development, Fire, Mass Movement, and Riparian Change. Ice Damage and Coastal Change were added for OLYM only. Ice Damage category captures changes in vegetation damaged by heavy, long-lasting snow and ice followed by severe winds and generally characterized by broken tree branches. Coastal Change category captures partial to complete vegetation removal due to storm surges or other factors unique to the coastal foredune and strand. The Avalanche category captures long, linear change which partially or completely removes vegetation from the valley wall following a release of a large mass of snow down a mountain side. Clearings are areas under forest management where practices vary from thinning to clearcuts. The Development category captures changes associated with complete and persistent removal of vegetation and transformation to a built landscape. Changes due to Fire vary in intensity from full canopy removal to partial burns that leave behind a mixture of dead and scorched trees. The Mass Movement category includes both landslides found on valley walls and debris flows associated with streams. Defoliation is a change type in which the forest cover remains but has declined due to insect infestation, disease or drought. Riparian Change disturbance events are restricted to valley floors alongside major streams and rivers and capture areas where either conifer or broadleaf vegetation previously existed and has been converted to river channel. Change due to Blowdown is evidenced by broken or topped trees, generally due to wind but sometimes to root rot.

  5. a

    Bay of Plenty Land Use 2017

    • maps-boprc.opendata.arcgis.com
    • maps.boprc.govt.nz
    • +2more
    Updated Jun 14, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Bay of Plenty Regional Council (2018). Bay of Plenty Land Use 2017 [Dataset]. https://maps-boprc.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/bay-of-plenty-land-use-2017
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 14, 2018
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Bay of Plenty Regional Council
    License

    Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    Bay of Plenty Land Use Project 2017 by BOPRC.The purpose of this layer was to help build a baseline data set for a region wide Integrated Catchment Model. As there was no complete region scale coverage landuse dataset that modelled current state, we decided to build one. The project took 3 different approaches to map the landuse. 1) Using existing data landuse type datasets like lcdbv4, landcare data, agribase (which all used different scales, time periods, coverage, methods of development) and 2) from aerial photography (2011, 2014 coastal, part 2016 where available and satellite/google earth inagery) and 3) then ran some ground truthing for validation where possible.

  6. A

    Worldview

    • data.amerigeoss.org
    • amerigeo.org
    • +9more
    esri rest, html
    Updated Nov 9, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    AmeriGEO ArcGIS (2018). Worldview [Dataset]. https://data.amerigeoss.org/nl/dataset/worldview
    Explore at:
    esri rest, htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 9, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    AmeriGEO ArcGIS
    Description

    The Worldview tool from NASA's Earth Observing System Data and Information System (EOSDIS) provides the capability to interactively browse over 800 global, full-resolution satellite imagery layers and then download the underlying data. Many of the imagery layers are updated within three hours of observation, essentially showing the entire Earth as it looks "right now". This supports time-critical application areas such as wildfire management, air quality measurements, and flood monitoring. View current natural hazards and events using the Events tab which reveals a list of natural events, including wildfires, tropical storms, and volcanic eruptions. Animate the imagery over time. Arctic and Antarctic views of many products are also available for a "full globe" perspective. Browsing on tablet and smartphone devices is generally supported for mobile access to the imagery.


    Powered by GIBS

    Worldview uses NASA's Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS) to rapidly retrieve its imagery for an interactive browsing experience. While Worldview uses OpenLayers as its mapping library, GIBS imagery can also be accessed from Google Earth, NASA WorldWind, and several other clients. We encourage interested developers to build their own clients or integrate NASA imagery into their existing ones using these services.

    Comments/suggestions/problem reports are welcome via Earthdata Support. View frequently asked questions (FAQ) about Worldview.

    Source Information Obtained Oct 18, 2018 from https://earthdata.nasa.gov/worldview

  7. u

    Accessibility To Cities 2015

    • datacore-gn.unepgrid.ch
    Updated May 16, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Accessibility To Cities 2015 (2018). Accessibility To Cities 2015 [Dataset]. https://datacore-gn.unepgrid.ch/geonetwork/srv/api/records/dd9da394-1f82-423a-a290-24744ba79a78
    Explore at:
    ogc:wms-1.3.0-http-get-map, www:link-1.0-http--linkAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 16, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    Accessibility To Cities 2015
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2015 - Dec 31, 2015
    Area covered
    Description

    This global accessibility map enumerates land-based travel time to the nearest densely-populated area for all areas between 85 degrees north and 60 degrees south for a nominal year 2015. Densely-populated areas are defined as contiguous areas with 1,500 or more inhabitants per square kilometre or a majority of built-up land cover types coincident with a population centre of at least 50,000 inhabitants. This map was produced through a collaboration between MAP (University of Oxford), Google, the European Union Joint Research Centre (JRC), and the University of Twente, Netherlands.The underlying datasets used to produce the map include roads (comprising the first ever global-scale use of Open Street Map and Google roads datasets), railways, rivers, lakes, oceans, topographic conditions (slope and elevation), landcover types, and national borders. These datasets were each allocated a speed or speeds of travel in terms of time to cross each pixel of that type. The datasets were then combined to produce a "friction surface"; a map where every pixel is allocated a nominal overall speed of travel based on the types occurring within that pixel. Least-cost-path algorithms (running in Google Earth Engine and, for high-latitude areas, in R) were used in conjunction with this friction surface to calculate the time of travel from all locations to the nearest (in time) city. The cities dataset used is the high-density-cover product created by the Global Human Settlement Project. Each pixel in the resultant accessibility map thus represents the modelled shortest time from that location to a city. Authors: D.J. Weiss, A. Nelson, H.S. Gibson, W. Temperley, S. Peedell, A. Lieber, M. Hancher, E. Poyart, S. Belchior, N. Fullman, B. Mappin, U. Dalrymple, J. Rozier, T.C.D. Lucas, R.E. Howes, L.S. Tusting, S.Y. Kang, E. Cameron, D. Bisanzio, K.E. Battle, S. Bhatt, and P.W. Gething. A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015. (2018). Nature. doi:10.1038/nature25181

    Processing notes: Data were processed from numerous sources including OpenStreetMap, Google Maps, Land Cover mapping, and others, to generate a global friction surface of average land-based travel speed. This accessibility surface was then derived from that friction surface via a least-cost-path algorithm finding at each location the closest point from global databases of population centres and densely-populated areas. Please see the associated publication for full details of the processing.

    Source: https://map.ox.ac.uk/research-project/accessibility_to_cities/

  8. d

    HUN SW footprint shapefiles v01

    • data.gov.au
    • researchdata.edu.au
    • +4more
    zip
    Updated Apr 13, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Bioregional Assessment Program (2022). HUN SW footprint shapefiles v01 [Dataset]. https://data.gov.au/data/dataset/2a9520c8-1569-4e0e-8bd8-26e2c7b9e9e0
    Explore at:
    zip(846015)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 13, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Bioregional Assessment Program
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Abstract

    This is a source dataset created by the Bioregional Assessment Programme without the use of source data.

    This dataset contains all of the surface water footprint polygons that were created from mining reports that were used in the surface water modelling. There is also a document with the source references for all of the footprints included in the dataset.

    Dataset History

    Environmental impact statements and similar documents were downloaded from New South Wales Department of Planning and Environment Major Projects website, and from mining companies' websites. To obtain mine footprints for surface water modelling, the mining reports were searched for past and future projected mine layouts and surface water contributing areas. Each figure was digitised and georeferenced using one of four methods:

    1. The preferred method was to use maps or plans with coordinates already on them.

    2. If there were no coordinates, then three point locations were matched with points on Google Earth and the latitude and longitude from Google Earth were used to georeference the image.

    3. If there were not three clearly identifiable point locations in the image, then supplementary points were found by matching contour information to the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Smoothed Digital Elevation Model (SRTM DEM-S) grid

    Dataset GUID - 12e0731d-96dd-49cc-aa21-ebfd65a3f67a

    1. Other site-specific approaches: a. Mangoola Coal Mine did not have adequate georeferencing points in the Year 10 and Final Landform images so these images were georeferenced to the matching project boundary in the other Mangoola Coal Mine images.

    b. The West Wallsend Colliery existing pit top surface facilities image, containing a satellite photo background, was georeferenced using Google Earth. The West Wallsend Colliery pit top facility outline was used to georeference the water management system image as they both contained the same outline.

    These areas were exported as polygon files (*.poly) using Geosoft Oasis Montaj software.

    A list of documents used for creating these polygon files are also included in the dataset

    Dataset Citation

    Bioregional Assessment Programme (2016) HUN SW footprint shapefiles v01. Bioregional Assessment Source Dataset. Viewed 13 March 2019, http://data.bioregionalassessments.gov.au/dataset/2a9520c8-1569-4e0e-8bd8-26e2c7b9e9e0.

  9. Data from: Forest roads (Congo Basin)

    • zenodo.org
    zip
    Updated Sep 16, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Bart Slagter; Bart Slagter; Kurt Fesenmyer; Matthew Hethcoat; Matthew Hethcoat; Ethan Belair; Ethan Belair; Peter Ellis; Fritz Kleinschroth; Fritz Kleinschroth; Marielos Peña-Claros; Marielos Peña-Claros; Martin Herold; Johannes Reiche; Johannes Reiche; Kurt Fesenmyer; Peter Ellis; Martin Herold (2024). Forest roads (Congo Basin) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13739812
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 16, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Bart Slagter; Bart Slagter; Kurt Fesenmyer; Matthew Hethcoat; Matthew Hethcoat; Ethan Belair; Ethan Belair; Peter Ellis; Fritz Kleinschroth; Fritz Kleinschroth; Marielos Peña-Claros; Marielos Peña-Claros; Martin Herold; Johannes Reiche; Johannes Reiche; Kurt Fesenmyer; Peter Ellis; Martin Herold
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Congo Basin
    Description

    Description

    Road development in the Congo Basin forest is continuously monitored from 2019 onwards in high spatial and temporal detail. A deep learning method is applied to 10 m scale Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 imagery for automated road detections on a monthly basis. This version presents 5 years of road development (46,311 km) from 2019-2023.

    The data is composed of line features distributed in .shp and .geojson formats. The following attributes are stored for the line features:

    • NetworkID: A unique ID for each connected road network.
    • SegLenM: The length of the road segment (in meters).
    • NetLenM: The length of the connected road network (in meters).
    • Month: The road segment opening month.
    • Year: The road segment opening year.
    • MonthNum: The road segment opening month, depicted as a continuing count since the start of monitoring (e.g. 13 = January 2020). This attribute can be used for smooth and continuous temporal analyses or visualizations.

    Additional information

    Citation

    Please cite the following when referring to this dataset:

    Slagter B., Fesenmyer K., Hethcoat M., Belair E., Ellis P., Kleinschroth F., Peña-Claros M., Herold M., Reiche J. (2024). Monitoring road development in Congo Basin forests with multi-sensor satellite imagery and deep learning. Remote Sensing of Environment

  10. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere (2025). Coral Sea Sentinel 2 Marine Satellite Composite Draft Imagery version 0 (AIMS) [Dataset]. https://devweb.dga.links.com.au/data/dataset/coral-sea-sentinel-2-marine-satellite-composite-draft-imagery-version-0-aims
Organization logo

Coral Sea Sentinel 2 Marine Satellite Composite Draft Imagery version 0 (AIMS)

Explore at:
pngAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Mar 13, 2025
Dataset provided by
CSIROhttp://www.csiro.au/
Authors
CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere
Description

This dataset contains composite satellite images for the Coral Sea region based on 10 m resolution Sentinel 2 imagery from 2015 – 2021. This image collection is intended to allow mapping of the reef and island features of the Coral Sea. This is a draft version of the dataset prepared from approximately 60% of the available Sentinel 2 image. An improved version of this dataset was released https://doi.org/10.26274/NH77-ZW79. This collection contains composite imagery for 31 Sentinel 2 tiles in the Coral Sea. For each tile there are 5 different colour and contrast enhancement styles intended to highlight different features. These include: - DeepFalse - Bands: B1 (ultraviolet), B2 (blue), B3 (green): False colour image that shows deep marine features to 50 - 60 m depth. This imagery exploits the clear waters of the Coral Sea to allow the ultraviolet band to provide a much deeper view of coral reefs than is typically achievable with true colour imagery. This technique doesn't work where the water is not as clear as the ultraviolet get scattered easily. - DeepMarine - Bands: B2 (blue), B3 (green), B4 (red): This is a contrast enhanced version of the true colour imagery, focusing on being able to better see the deeper features. Shallow features are over exposed due to the increased contrast. - ReefTop - Bands: B3 (red): This imagery is contrast enhanced to create an mask (black and white) of reef tops, delineating areas that are shallower or deeper than approximately 4 - 5 m. This mask is intended to assist in the creating of a GIS layer equivalent to the 'GBR Dry Reefs' dataset. The depth mapping exploits the limited water penetration of the red channel. In clear water the red channel can only see features to approximately 6 m regardless of the substrate type. - Shallow - Bands: B5 (red edge), B8 (Near Infrared) , B11 (Short Wave infrared): This false colour imagery focuses on identifying very shallow and dry regions in the imagery. It exploits the property that the longer wavelength bands progressively penetrate the water less. B5 penetrates the water approximately 3 - 5 m, B8 approximately 0.5 m and B11 < 0.1 m. Feature less than a couple of metres appear dark blue, dry areas are white. - TrueColour - Bands: B2 (blue), B3 (green), B4 (red): True colour imagery. This is useful to interpreting what shallow features are and in mapping the vegetation on cays and identifying beach rock. For most Sentinel tiles there are two versions of the DeepFalse and DeepMarine imagery based on different collections (dates). The R1 imagery are composites made up from the best available imagery while the R2 imagery uses the next best set of imagery. This splitting of the imagery is to allow two composites to be created from the pool of available imagery so that mapped features could be checked against two images. Typically the R2 imagery will have more artefacts from clouds. The satellite imagery was processed in tiles (approximately 100 x 100 km) to keep each final image small enough to manage. The dataset only covers the portion of the Coral Sea where there are shallow coral reefs. Methods: The satellite image composites were created by combining multiple Sentinel 2 images using the Google Earth Engine. The core algorithm was: 1. For each Sentinel 2 tile, the set of Sentinel images from 2015 – 2021 were reviewed manually. In some tiles the cloud cover threshold was raised to gather more images, particularly if there were less than 20 images available. The Google Earth Engine image IDs of the best images were recorded. These were the images with the clearest water, lowest waves, lowest cloud, and lowest sun glint. 2. A composite image was created from the best images by taking the statistical median of the stack of images selected in the previous stage, after masking out clouds and their shadows (described in detail later). 3. The contrast of the images was enhanced to create a series of products for different uses. The true colour image retained the full range of tones visible, so that bright sand cays still retained some detail. The marine enhanced version stretched the blue, green and red channels so that they focused on the deeper, darker marine features. This stretching was done to ensure that when converted to 8-bit colour imagery that all the dark detail in the deeper areas were visible. This contrast enhancement resulted in bright areas of the imagery clipping, leading to loss of detail in shallow reef areas and colours of land areas looking off. A reef top estimate was produced from the red channel (B4) where the contrast was stretched so that the imagery contains almost a binary mask. The threshold was chosen to approximate the 5 m depth contour for the clear waters of the Coral Sea. Lastly a false colour image was produced to allow mapping of shallow water features such as cays and islands. This image was produced from B5 (far red), B8 (nir), B11 (nir), where blue represents depths from approximately 0.5 – 5 m, green areas with 0 – 0.5 m depth, and brown and white corresponding to dry land. 4. The various contrast enhanced composite images were exported from Google Earth Engine (default of 32 bit GeoTiff) and reprocessed to smaller LZW compresed 8 bit GeoTiff images GDAL. Cloud Masking Prior to combining the best images each image was processed to mask out clouds and their shadows. The cloud masking uses the COPERNICUS/S2_CLOUD_PROBABILITY dataset developed by SentinelHub (Google, n.d.; Zupanc, 2017). The mask includes the cloud areas, plus a mask to remove cloud shadows. The cloud shadows were estimated by projecting the cloud mask in the direction opposite the angle to the sun. The shadow distance was estimated in two parts. A low cloud mask was created based on the assumption that small clouds have a small shadow distance. These were detected using a 40% cloud probability threshold. These were projected over 400 m, followed by a 150 m buffer to expand the final mask. A high cloud mask was created to cover longer shadows created by taller, larger clouds. These clouds were detected based on an 80% cloud probability threshold, followed by an erosion and dilation of 300 m to remove small clouds. These were then projected over a 1.5 km distance followed by a 300 m buffer. The parameters for the cloud masking (probability threshold, projection distance and buffer radius) were determined through trial and error on a small number of scenes. As such there are probably significant potential improvements that could be made to this algorithm. Erosion, dilation and buffer operations were performed at a lower image resolution than the native satellite image resolution to improve the computational speed. The resolution of these operations were adjusted so that they were performed with approximately a 4 pixel resolution during these operations. This made the cloud mask significantly more spatially coarse than the 10 m Sentinel imagery. This resolution was chosen as a trade-off between the coarseness of the mask verse the processing time for these operations. With 4-pixel filter resolutions these operations were still using over 90% of the total processing resulting in each image taking approximately 10 min to compute on the Google Earth Engine. Sun glint removal and atmospheric correction. Sun glint was removed from the images using the infrared B8 band to estimate the reflection off the water from the sun glint. B8 penetrates water less than 0.5 m and so in water areas it only detects reflections off the surface of the water. The sun glint detected by B8 correlates very highly with the sun glint experienced by the ultra violet and visible channels (B1, B2, B3 and B4) and so the sun glint in these channels can be removed by subtracting B8 from these channels. This simple sun glint correction fails in very shallow and land areas. On land areas B8 is very bright and thus subtracting it from the other channels results in black land. In shallow areas (< 0.5 m) the B8 channel detects the substrate, resulting in too much sun glint correction. To resolve these issues the sun glint correction was adjusted by transitioning to B11 for shallow areas as it penetrates the water even less than B8. We don't use B11 everywhere because it is half the resolution of B8. Land areas need their tonal levels to be adjusted to match the water areas after sun glint correction. Ideally this would be achieved using an atmospheric correction that compensates for the contrast loss due to haze in the atmosphere. Complex models for atmospheric correction involve considering the elevation of the surface (higher areas have less atmosphere to pass through) and the weather conditions. Since this dataset is focused on coral reef areas, elevation compensation is unnecessary due to the very low and flat land features being imaged. Additionally the focus of the dataset it on marine features and so only a basic atmospheric correction is needed. Land areas (as determined by very bright B8 areas) where assigned a fixed smaller correction factor to approximate atmospheric correction. This fixed atmospheric correction was determined iteratively so that land areas matched the tonal value of shallow and water areas. Image selection Available Sentinel 2 images with a cloud cover of less than 0.5% were manually reviewed using an Google Earth Engine App 01-select-sentinel2-images.js. Where there were few images available (less than 30 images) the cloud cover threshold was raised to increase the set of images that were raised. Images were excluded from the composites primarily due to two main factors: sun glint and fine scattered clouds. The images were excluded if there was any significant uncorrected sun glint in the image, i.e. the brightness of the sun glint exceeded the sun glint correction. Fine scattered clouds over reef areas were also a strong factor in down grading the quality rating of the image. As each satellite images were reviewed they were

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu