The global big data market is forecasted to grow to 103 billion U.S. dollars by 2027, more than double its expected market size in 2018. With a share of 45 percent, the software segment would become the large big data market segment by 2027.

What is Big data?

Big data is a term that refers to the kind of data sets that are too large or too complex for traditional data processing applications. It is defined as having one or some of the following characteristics: high volume, high velocity or high variety. Fast-growing mobile data traffic, cloud computing traffic, as well as the rapid development of technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) all contribute to the increasing volume and complexity of data sets.

Big data analytics

Advanced analytics tools, such as predictive analytics and data mining, help to extract value from the data and generate new business insights. The global big data and business analytics market was valued at 169 billion U.S. dollars in 2018 and is expected to grow to 274 billion U.S. dollars in 2022. As of November 2018, 45 percent of professionals in the market research industry reportedly used big data analytics as a research method.

The Hadoop Big Data Analytics Market is segmented Solution (Data Discovery and Visualization (DDV), Advanced Analytics (AA)) End-User Industry (BFSI, Retail, IT and Telecom, Healthcare and Life Sciences, Manufacturing, Media and Entertainment), and Geography (North America (United States, Canada), Europe (United Kingdom, Germany), Asia Pacific (China, Japan), Latin America, Middle East, and Africa).The market sizes and forecasts are provided in terms of value (USD billion) for all the above segments.

The global big data and business analytics (BDA) market was valued at 168.8 billion U.S. dollars in 2018 and is forecast to grow to 215.7 billion U.S. dollars by 2021. In 2021, more than half of BDA spending will go towards services. IT services is projected to make up around 85 billion U.S. dollars, and business services will account for the remainder. Big data High volume, high velocity and high variety: one or more of these characteristics is used to define big data, the kind of data sets that are too large or too complex for traditional data processing applications. Fast-growing mobile data traffic, cloud computing traffic, as well as the rapid development of technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) all contribute to the increasing volume and complexity of data sets. For example, connected IoT devices are projected to generate 79.4 ZBs of data in 2025. Business analytics Advanced analytics tools, such as predictive analytics and data mining, help to extract value from the data and generate business insights. The size of the business intelligence and analytics software application market is forecast to reach around 16.5 billion U.S. dollars in 2022. Growth in this market is driven by a focus on digital transformation, a demand for data visualization dashboards, and an increased adoption of cloud.

The USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS) recently established SCINet , which consists of a shared high performance computing resource, Ceres, and the dedicated high-speed Internet2 network used to access Ceres. Current and potential SCINet users are using and generating very large datasets so SCINet needs to be provisioned with adequate data storage for their active computing. It is not designed to hold data beyond active research phases. At the same time, the National Agricultural Library has been developing the Ag Data Commons, a research data catalog and repository designed for public data release and professional data curation. Ag Data Commons needs to anticipate the size and nature of data it will be tasked with handling. The ARS Web-enabled Databases Working Group, organized under the SCINet initiative, conducted a study to establish baseline data storage needs and practices, and to make projections that could inform future infrastructure design, purchases, and policies. The SCINet Web-enabled Databases Working Group helped develop the survey which is the basis for an internal report. While the report was for internal use, the survey and resulting data may be generally useful and are being released publicly. From October 24 to November 8, 2016 we administered a 17-question survey (Appendix A) by emailing a Survey Monkey link to all ARS Research Leaders, intending to cover data storage needs of all 1,675 SY (Category 1 and Category 4) scientists. We designed the survey to accommodate either individual researcher responses or group responses. Research Leaders could decide, based on their unit's practices or their management preferences, whether to delegate response to a data management expert in their unit, to all members of their unit, or to themselves collate responses from their unit before reporting in the survey.
Larger storage ranges cover vastly different amounts of data so the implications here could be significant depending on whether the true amount is at the lower or higher end of the range. Therefore, we requested more detail from "Big Data users," those 47 respondents who indicated they had more than 10 to 100 TB or over 100 TB total current data (Q5). All other respondents are called "Small Data users." Because not all of these follow-up requests were successful, we used actual follow-up responses to estimate likely responses for those who did not respond. We defined active data as data that would be used within the next six months. All other data would be considered inactive, or archival. To calculate per person storage needs we used the high end of the reported range divided by 1 for an individual response, or by G, the number of individuals in a group response. For Big Data users we used the actual reported values or estimated likely values.

Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Appendix A: ARS data storage survey questions. File Name: Appendix A.pdfResource Description: The full list of questions asked with the possible responses. The survey was not administered using this PDF but the PDF was generated directly from the administered survey using the Print option under Design Survey. Asterisked questions were required. A list of Research Units and their associated codes was provided in a drop down not shown here. Resource Software Recommended: Adobe Acrobat,url: https://get.adobe.com/reader/ Resource Title: CSV of Responses from ARS Researcher Data Storage Survey. File Name: Machine-readable survey response data.csvResource Description: CSV file includes raw responses from the administered survey, as downloaded unfiltered from Survey Monkey, including incomplete responses. Also includes additional classification and calculations to support analysis. Individual email addresses and IP addresses have been removed. This information is that same data as in the Excel spreadsheet (also provided).Resource Title: Responses from ARS Researcher Data Storage Survey. File Name: Data Storage Survey Data for public release.xlsxResource Description: MS Excel worksheet that Includes raw responses from the administered survey, as downloaded unfiltered from Survey Monkey, including incomplete responses. Also includes additional classification and calculations to support analysis. Individual email addresses and IP addresses have been removed.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel

The Report Covers Global Big Data Services Market Size & Industry Share and It is Segmented by Deployment Type (On-Premise and Cloud), End-User (Telecom and IT, Energy and Power, BFSI, Healthcare, Retail, and Other End-Users), and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East and Africa). The Market Size and Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD) for all the Above Segments.

Please cite the following paper when using this dataset:N. Thakur, "Twitter Big Data as a Resource for Exoskeleton Research: A Large-Scale Dataset of about 140,000 Tweets from 2017–2022 and 100 Research Questions", Journal of Analytics, Volume 1, Issue 2, 2022, pp. 72-97, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/analytics1020007AbstractThe exoskeleton technology has been rapidly advancing in the recent past due to its multitude of applications and diverse use cases in assisted living, military, healthcare, firefighting, and industry 4.0. The exoskeleton market is projected to increase by multiple times its current value within the next two years. Therefore, it is crucial to study the degree and trends of user interest, views, opinions, perspectives, attitudes, acceptance, feedback, engagement, buying behavior, and satisfaction, towards exoskeletons, for which the availability of Big Data of conversations about exoskeletons is necessary. The Internet of Everything style of today’s living, characterized by people spending more time on the internet than ever before, with a specific focus on social media platforms, holds the potential for the development of such a dataset by the mining of relevant social media conversations. Twitter, one such social media platform, is highly popular amongst all age groups, where the topics found in the conversation paradigms include emerging technologies such as exoskeletons. To address this research challenge, this work makes two scientific contributions to this field. First, it presents an open-access dataset of about 140,000 Tweets about exoskeletons that were posted in a 5-year period from 21 May 2017 to 21 May 2022. Second, based on a comprehensive review of the recent works in the fields of Big Data, Natural Language Processing, Information Retrieval, Data Mining, Pattern Recognition, and Artificial Intelligence that may be applied to relevant Twitter data for advancing research, innovation, and discovery in the field of exoskeleton research, a total of 100 Research Questions are presented for researchers to study, analyze, evaluate, ideate, and investigate based on this dataset.

This statistic features the impact of the Internet of Things (IoT) and/or Big Data on market positions in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2015, by industry. All interviewed respondents from the investment banking industry stated that the IoT or Big Data helped to establish their market position. In contrast, only 65 percent of the insurance companies reported the same impact of these technologies.

The Big Data Consulting Market Report is Segmented by Service Type (Strategic Consulting, Implementation Services, Analytics and Insights, Managed Services, Training and Support), Deployment Model (On-Premise, Cloud-Based, Hybrid), Organization Size (Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), Large Enterprises), Application (Customer Analytics, Operational Analytics, Risk and Fraud Management, Supply Chain Management, Marketing and Sales Analytics, Predictive Maintenance, Financial Analytics, Other Applications), and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa). The Market Sizes and Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD) for all the Above Segments.

The Data Analytics in Retail Industry is segmented by Application (Merchandising and Supply Chain Analytics, Social Media Analytics, Customer Analytics, Operational Intelligence, Other Applications), by Business Type (Small and Medium Enterprises, Large-scale Organizations), and Geography. The market size and forecasts are provided in terms of value (USD billion) for all the above segments.

The Training Course (TC) covers an introduction to (i) linux, bash scripts, and R, (ii) read mapping for transcriptomics, (iii) genome assembly and annotation, and to (iv) biological data extraction. The TC is targeted towards biologist with little to no programming experience and thus requires no prior knowledge with regard to programming or linux. To proceed with the course, store all data in a folder and note its location. Within the course manual, file location is hard coded – please replace the file location in the documents with the one where you stored the data on your system.

A linux operating system with at least 8Gb of RAM and at least 2 CPUs is recommended for execution of the programs in a timely manner. You will need root privileges (i.e. have administrator rights) on the system.

Within the course documents, programs and methods are not attributed according to scientific standards as the course manual was meant for hands on execution and training, but not as a reference manual. Please cite original authors for all programs and tools if you use them in your work.

The main document 'BigDataTrainingCourse2016_manual.pdf' will guide you through the course material and the structure of the data.

This is the updated version of the dataset from 10.5281/zenodo.6320761 Information The diverse publicly available compound/bioactivity databases constitute a key resource for data-driven applications in chemogenomics and drug design. Analysis of their coverage of compound entries and biological targets revealed considerable differences, however, suggesting benefit of a consensus dataset. Therefore, we have combined and curated information from five esteemed databases (ChEMBL, PubChem, BindingDB, IUPHAR/BPS and Probes&Drugs) to assemble a consensus compound/bioactivity dataset comprising 1144648 compounds with 10915362 bioactivities on 5613 targets (including defined macromolecular targets as well as cell-lines and phenotypic readouts). It also provides simplified information on assay types underlying the bioactivity data and on bioactivity confidence by comparing data from different sources. We have unified the source databases, brought them into a common format and combined them, enabling an ease for generic uses in multiple applications such as chemogenomics and data-driven drug design. The consensus dataset provides increased target coverage and contains a higher number of molecules compared to the source databases which is also evident from a larger number of scaffolds. These features render the consensus dataset a valuable tool for machine learning and other data-driven applications in (de novo) drug design and bioactivity prediction. The increased chemical and bioactivity coverage of the consensus dataset may improve robustness of such models compared to the single source databases. In addition, semi-automated structure and bioactivity annotation checks with flags for divergent data from different sources may help data selection and further accurate curation. This dataset belongs to the publication: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27082513 Structure and content of the dataset Dataset structure ChEMBL ID PubChem ID IUPHAR ID Target Activity type Assay type Unit Mean C (0) ... Mean PC (0) ... Mean B (0) ... Mean I (0) ... Mean PD (0) ... Activity check annotation Ligand names Canonical SMILES C ... Structure check (Tanimoto) Source The dataset was created using the Konstanz Information Miner (KNIME) (https://www.knime.com/) and was exported as a CSV-file and a compressed CSV-file. Except for the canonical SMILES columns, all columns are filled with the datatype ‘string’. The datatype for the canonical SMILES columns is the smiles-format. We recommend the File Reader node for using the dataset in KNIME. With the help of this node the data types of the columns can be adjusted exactly. In addition, only this node can read the compressed format. Column content: ChEMBL ID, PubChem ID, IUPHAR ID: chemical identifier of the databases Target: biological target of the molecule expressed as the HGNC gene symbol Activity type: for example, pIC50 Assay type: Simplification/Classification of the assay into cell-free, cellular, functional and unspecified Unit: unit of bioactivity measurement Mean columns of the databases: mean of bioactivity values or activity comments denoted with the frequency of their occurrence in the database, e.g. Mean C = 7.5 *(15) -> the value for this compound-target pair occurs 15 times in ChEMBL database Activity check annotation: a bioactivity check was performed by comparing values from the different sources and adding an activity check annotation to provide automated activity validation for additional confidence no comment: bioactivity values are within one log unit; check activity data: bioactivity values are not within one log unit; only one data point: only one value was available, no comparison and no range calculated; no activity value: no precise numeric activity value was available; no log-value could be calculated: no negative decadic logarithm could be calculated, e.g., because the reported unit was not a compound concentration Ligand names: all unique names contained in the five source databases are listed Canonical SMILES columns: Molecular structure of the compound from each database Structure check (Tanimoto): To denote matching or differing compound structures in different source databases match: molecule structures are the same between different sources; no match: the structures differ. We calculated the Jaccard-Tanimoto similarity coefficient from Morgan Fingerprints to reveal true differences between sources and reported the minimum value; 1 structure: no structure comparison is possible, because there was only one structure available; no structure: no structure comparison is possible, because there was no structure available. Source: From which databases the data come from

The total amount of data created, captured, copied, and consumed globally is forecast to increase rapidly, reaching 149 zettabytes in 2024. Over the next five years up to 2028, global data creation is projected to grow to more than 394 zettabytes. In 2020, the amount of data created and replicated reached a new high. The growth was higher than previously expected, caused by the increased demand due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as more people worked and learned from home and used home entertainment options more often. Storage capacity also growing Only a small percentage of this newly created data is kept though, as just two percent of the data produced and consumed in 2020 was saved and retained into 2021. In line with the strong growth of the data volume, the installed base of storage capacity is forecast to increase, growing at a compound annual growth rate of 19.2 percent over the forecast period from 2020 to 2025. In 2020, the installed base of storage capacity reached 6.7 zettabytes.

The dataset is the field soil measurement and analysis data of the upstream of Heihe River Basin from 2013 to 2014, including soil particle analysis, water characteristic curve, saturated water conductivity, soil porosity, infiltration analysis, and soil bulk density I. Soil particle analysis 1. The soil particle size data were measured in the particle size laboratory of the Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education, West Ministry of Lanzhou University.The measuring instrument is Marvin laser particle size meter MS2000. 2. Particle size data were measured by laser particle size analyzer.As a result, sample points with large particles cannot be measured, such as D23 and D25 cannot be measured without data.Plus partial sample missing. Ii. Soil moisture characteristic curve 1. Centrifuge method: The unaltered soil of the ring-cutter collected in the field was put into the centrifuge, and the rotor weight of each time was measured with the rotation speed of 0, 310, 980, 1700, 2190, 2770, 3100, 5370, 6930, 8200 and 11600 respectively. 2. The ring cutter is numbered from 1 to the back according to the number. Since three groups are sampled at different places at the same time, in order to avoid repeated numbering, the first group is numbered from 1, the second group is numbered from 500, and the third group is numbered from 1000.It's consistent with the number of the sampling point.You can find the corresponding number in the two Excel. 3. The soil bulk density data in 2013 is supplementary to the sampling in 2012, so the data are not available at every point.At the same time, the soil layer of some sample points is not up to 70 cm thick, so the data of 5 layers cannot be taken. At the same time, a large part of data is missing due to transportation and recording problems.At the same time, only one layer of data is selected by random points. 4. Weight after drying: The drying weight of some samples was not measured due to problems with the oven during the experiment. 3. Saturated water conductivity of soil 1. Description of measurement method: The measurement method is based on the self-made instrument of Yiyanli (2009) for fixing water hair.The mariot bottle was used to keep the constant water head during the experiment.At the same time, the measured Ks was finally converted to the Ks value at 10℃ for analysis and calculation.Detailed measurement record table refer to saturation conductivity measurement description.K10℃ is the data of saturated water conductivity after conversion to 10℃.Unit: cm/min. 2. Data loss explanation: The data of saturated water conductivity is partly due to the lack of soil samples and the insufficient depth of the soil layer to obtain the data of the 4th or 5th layer 3. Sampling time: July 2014 4. Soil porosity 1. Use bulk density method to deduce: according to the relationship between soil bulk density and soil porosity. 2. The data in 2014 is supplementary to the sampling in 2012, so the data are not available at every point.At the same time, the soil layer of some sample points is not up to 70 cm thick, so the data of 5 layers cannot be taken. At the same time, a large part of data is missing due to transportation and recording problems.At the same time, only one layer of data is selected by random points. 5. Soil infiltration analysis 1. The infiltration data were measured by the "MINI DISK PORTABLE specific vector INFILTROMETER".The approximate saturation water conductivity under a certain negative pressure is obtained.The instrument is detailed in website: http://www.decagon.com/products/hydrology/hydraulic-conductivity/mini-disk-portable-tension-infiltrometer/ 2.D7 infiltration tests were not measured at that time because of rain. Vi. Soil bulk density 1. The bulk density of soil in 2014 refers to the undisturbed soil taken by ring cutter based on the basis of 2012. 2. The soil bulk density is dry soil bulk density, which is measured by drying method.The undisturbed ring-knife soil samples collected in the field were kept in an oven at 105℃ for 24 hours, and the dry weight of the soil was divided by the soil volume (100 cubic centimeters). 3. Unit: G /cm3

The Big Data Analytics in Power Sector Market Report is Segmented Based On Power Industry (Power Generation, and Power Transmission and Distribution), and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa). The Market Sizes and Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD) for all the Above Segments.

The Digital Geologic Map of the Beaumont Unit, Big Thicket National Preserve and Vicinity, Texas is composed of GIS data layers complete with ArcMap 9.3 layer (.LYR) files, two ancillary GIS tables, a Map PDF document with ancillary map text, figures and tables, a FGDC metadata record and a 9.3 ArcMap (.MXD) Document that displays the digital map in 9.3 ArcGIS. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: Big Thicket NPres staff and Texas Bureau of Economic Geology staff. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation sections(s) of this metadata record (bmnt_metadata.txt; available at http://nrdata.nps.gov/bith/nrdata/geology/gis/bmnt_metadata.xml). All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.1. (available at: http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/inventory/geology/GeologyGISDataModel.cfm). The GIS data is available as a 9.3 personal geodatabase (bmnt_geology.mdb), and as shapefile (.SHP) and DBASEIV (.DBF) table files. The GIS data projection is NAD83, UTM Zone 15N. That data is within the area of interest of Big Thicket National Preserve.

The Training Course (TC) covers an introduction to (i) linux, bash scripts, and R, (ii) read mapping for transcriptomics, (iii) genome assembly and annotation, and to (iv) biological data extraction. The TC is targeted towards biologist with little to no programming experience and thus requires no prior knowledge with regard to programming or linux. To proceed with the course, store all data in a folder and note its location. Within the course manual, file location is hard coded – please replace the file location in the documents with the one where you stored the data on your system.

A linux operating system with at least 8Gb of RAM and at least 2 CPUs is recommended for execution of the programs in a timely manner. You will need root privileges (i.e. have administrator rights) on the system.

Within the course documents, programs and methods are not attributed according to scientific standards as the course manual was meant for hands on execution and training, but not as a reference manual. Please cite original authors for all programs and tools if you use them in your work.

The main document 'BigDataTrainingCourse2016_manual.pdf' will guide you through the course material and the structure of the data.

Russia Loss Amount: OKVED2: BM: Same Period PY=100: Year to Date: Mining and Quarrying (MQ) data was reported at 123.600 Same Period PY=100 in Nov 2018. This records a decrease from the previous number of 124.600 Same Period PY=100 for Oct 2018. Russia Loss Amount: OKVED2: BM: Same Period PY=100: Year to Date: Mining and Quarrying (MQ) data is updated monthly, averaging 75.100 Same Period PY=100 from Jan 2017 (Median) to Nov 2018, with 23 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 185.000 Same Period PY=100 in Jan 2018 and a record low of 26.200 Same Period PY=100 in Jan 2017. Russia Loss Amount: OKVED2: BM: Same Period PY=100: Year to Date: Mining and Quarrying (MQ) data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Federal State Statistics Service. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Russian Federation – Table RU.OD007: Enterprises Balance (Profit less Loss): Big and Medium: ytd: Loss: Same Period PY=100.

Russia Profit Amount: OKVED2: BM: Same Period PY=100: Year to Date: TS: LP: Passenger Rail Transport, Interurban data was reported at 86.700 Same Period PY=100 in Nov 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 75.500 Same Period PY=100 for Oct 2018. Russia Profit Amount: OKVED2: BM: Same Period PY=100: Year to Date: TS: LP: Passenger Rail Transport, Interurban data is updated monthly, averaging 107.500 Same Period PY=100 from Jan 2017 (Median) to Nov 2018, with 23 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 560.000 Same Period PY=100 in Jan 2017 and a record low of 69.600 Same Period PY=100 in Apr 2018. Russia Profit Amount: OKVED2: BM: Same Period PY=100: Year to Date: TS: LP: Passenger Rail Transport, Interurban data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Federal State Statistics Service. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Russian Federation – Table RU.OD004: Enterprises Balance (Profit less Loss): Big and Medium: ytd: Profit: Same Period PY=100.

The Big Data Analytics in Banking Market is Segmented by Type of Solutions (Data Discovery and Visualization (DDV) and Advanced Analytics (AA)), and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa). The Market Sizes and Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD Million) for all the Above Segments.

The Digital Geologic Map of the Little Pine Island Bayou Corridor Unit, Big Thicket National Preserve and Vicinity, Texas is composed of GIS data layers complete with ArcMap 9.3 layer (.LYR) files, two ancillary GIS tables, a Map PDF document with ancillary map text, figures and tables, a FGDC metadata record and a 9.3 ArcMap (.MXD) Document that displays the digital map in 9.3 ArcGIS. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: Big Thicket NPres staff and Texas Bureau of Economic Geology staff. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation sections(s) of this metadata record (lpis_metadata.txt; available at http://nrdata.nps.gov/bith/nrdata/geology/gis/lpis_metadata.xml). All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.1. (available at: http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/inventory/geology/GeologyGISDataModel.cfm). The GIS data is available as a 9.3 personal geodatabase (lpis_geology.mdb), and as shapefile (.SHP) and DBASEIV (.DBF) table files. The GIS data projection is NAD83, UTM Zone 15N. That data is within the area of interest of Big Thicket National Preserve.