Facebook
TwitterAn example of combining ANOVA terms for bivariate principle component data to create the ANODIS F-statistic where N is the total number of samples drawn and K, the number of assemblages compared.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Distance covariance (Székely, Rizzo, and Bakirov) is a fascinating recent notion, which is popular as a test for dependence of any type between random variables X and Y. This approach deserves to be touched upon in modern courses on mathematical statistics. It makes use of distances of the type |X−X′| and |Y−Y′|, where (X′,Y′) is an independent copy of (X, Y). This raises natural questions about independence of variables like X−X′ and Y−Y′, about the connection between cov(|X−X′|,|Y−Y′|) and the covariance between doubly centered distances, and about necessary and sufficient conditions for independence. We show some basic results and present a new and nontechnical counterexample to a common fallacy, which provides more insight. We also show some motivating examples involving bivariate distributions and contingency tables, which can be used as didactic material for introducing distance correlation.
Facebook
TwitterCC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Background: Clean water is an essential part of human healthy life and wellbeing. More recently, rapid population growth, high illiteracy rate, lack of sustainable development, and climate change; faces a global challenge in developing countries. The discontinuity of drinking water supply forces households either to use unsafe water storage materials or to use water from unsafe sources. The present study aimed to identify the determinants of water source types, use, quality of water, and sanitation perception of physical parameters among urban households in North-West Ethiopia.
Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among households from February to March 2019. An interview-based a pretested and structured questionnaire was used to collect the data. Data collection samples were selected randomly and proportional to each of the kebeles' households. MS Excel and R Version 3.6.2 were used to enter and analyze the data; respectively. Descriptive statistics using frequencies and percentages were used to explain the sample data concerning the predictor variable. Both bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to assess the association between independent and response variables.
Results: Four hundred eighteen (418) households have participated. Based on the study undertaken,78.95% of households used improved and 21.05% of households used unimproved drinking water sources. Households drinking water sources were significantly associated with the age of the participant (x2 = 20.392, df=3), educational status(x2 = 19.358, df=4), source of income (x2 = 21.777, df=3), monthly income (x2 = 13.322, df=3), availability of additional facilities (x2 = 98.144, df=7), cleanness status (x2 =42.979, df=4), scarcity of water (x2 = 5.1388, df=1) and family size (x2 = 9.934, df=2). The logistic regression analysis also indicated that those factors are significantly determining the water source types used by the households. Factors such as availability of toilet facility, household member type, and sex of the head of the household were not significantly associated with drinking water sources.
Conclusion: The uses of drinking water from improved sources were determined by different demographic, socio-economic, sanitation, and hygiene-related factors. Therefore, ; the local, regional, and national governments and other supporting organizations shall improve the accessibility and adequacy of drinking water from improved sources in the area.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Example of data.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This folder contains four examples of merging crystallographic intensities with a bivariate prior:
Additionally, we provide several auxilliary examples:
Every example includes scripts to run Careless as well as to analyze the outputs in order to reproduce the figures in the double-Wilson manuscript. For every example, there is a `README.md` that describes the contents of each example folder.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This article introduces a graphical goodness-of-fit test for copulas in more than two dimensions. The test is based on pairs of variables and can thus be interpreted as a first-order approximation of the underlying dependence structure. The idea is to first transform pairs of data columns with the Rosenblatt transform to bivariate standard uniform distributions under the null hypothesis. This hypothesis can be graphically tested with a matrix of bivariate scatterplots, Q-Q plots, or other transformations. Furthermore, additional information can be encoded as background color, such as measures of association or (approximate) p-values of tests of independence. The proposed goodness-of-fit test is designed as a basic graphical tool for detecting deviations from a postulated, possibly high-dimensional, dependence model. Various examples are given and the methodology is applied to a financial dataset. An implementation is provided by the R package copula. Supplementary material for this article is available online, which provides the R package copula and reproduces all the graphical results of this article.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Dataset for: Leipold, B. & Loepthien, T. (2021). Attentive and emotional listening to music: The role of positive and negative affect. Jahrbuch Musikpsychologie, 30. https://doi.org/10.5964/jbdgm.78 In a cross-sectional study associations of global affect with two ways of listening to music – attentive–analytical listening (AL) and emotional listening (EL) were examined. More specifically, the degrees to which AL and EL are differentially correlated with positive and negative affect were examined. In Study 1, a sample of 1,291 individuals responded to questionnaires on listening to music, positive affect (PA), and negative affect (NA). We used the PANAS that measures PA and NA as high arousal dimensions. AL was positively correlated with PA, EL with NA. Moderation analyses showed stronger associations between PA and AL when NA was low. Study 2 (499 participants) differentiated between three facets of affect and focused, in addition to PA and NA, on the role of relaxation. Similar to the findings of Study 1, AL was correlated with PA, EL with NA and PA. Moderation analyses indicated that the degree to which PA is associated with an individual´s tendency to listen to music attentively depends on their degree of relaxation. In addition, the correlation between pleasant activation and EL was stronger for individuals who were more relaxed; for individuals who were less relaxed the correlation between unpleasant activation and EL was stronger. In sum, the results demonstrate not only simple bivariate correlations, but also that the expected associations vary, depending on the different affective states. We argue that the results reflect a dual function of listening to music, which includes emotional regulation and information processing.: Dataset Study 2
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
When using univariate models, goodness of fit can be assessed through many different methods, including graphical tools such as half-normal plots with a simulation envelope. This is straightforward due to the notion of ordering of a univariate sample, which can readily reveal possible outliers. In the bivariate case, however, it is often difficult to detect extreme points and verify whether a sample of residuals is a reasonable realization from a fitted model. We propose a new framework, implemented as the bivrp R package, available on CRAN. Our framework uses the same principles of the simulation envelope in a half-normal plot, but as a simulation polygon for each point in a bivariate sample. By using algorithms of convex hull construction and polygon area reduction, we describe how our method works and illustrate its functionality with examples using simulated bivariate normal data and real bivariate count data. We show how different model diagnostics can produce different results and pinpoint potential drawbacks of our approach, such as the limitations in terms of computational burden. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset supports a meta-analytic structural equation modelling (MASEM) study investigating the factors influencing students’ behavioural intention to use educational AI (EAI) technologies. The research integrates constructs from the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), and Artificial Intelligence Literacy (AIL), aiming to resolve inconsistencies in previous studies and improve theoretical understanding of EAI technology adoption.
Research Hypotheses The study hypothesized that: Students’ behavioural intention (INT) to use EAI technologies is influenced by perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEU), attitude (ATT), subjective norm (SN), and perceived behavioural control (PBC), as described in TAM and TPB. AI literacy (AIL) directly and indirectly predicts PU, PEU, ATT, and INT. These relationships are moderated by contextual factors such as academic level (K–12 vs. higher education) and regional economic development (developed vs. developing countries).
What the Data Shows The meta-analytic dataset comprises 166 empirical studies involving over 69,000 participants. It includes pairwise Pearson correlations among seven constructs (PU, PEU, ATT, SN, PBC, INT, AIL) and is used to compute a pooled correlation matrix. This matrix was then used to test three models via MASEM: A baseline TAM-TPB model, An internal-extended model with additional TPB internal paths, An AIL-integrated extended model. The AIL-integrated model achieved the best fit (CFI = 0.997, RMSEA = 0.053) and explained 62.3% of the variance in behavioural intention.
Notable Findings AI literacy (AIL) is the strongest predictor of intention to use EAI technologies (Total Effect = 0.408). PU, ATT, and SN also significantly influence intention. The effect of PEU on intention is fully mediated by PU and ATT. Moderation analysis showed that the relationships differ between developed and developing countries and between K–12 and higher education populations.
How the Data Can Be Interpreted and Used The dataset includes bivariate correlations between variables, publication metadata, sample sizes, coding information, and reliability values (e.g., CR scores). Suitable for replication of MASEM procedures, moderation analysis, and meta-regression. Researchers may use it to test additional theoretical models or assess the influence of new moderators (e.g., AI tool type). Educators and policymakers can leverage insights from the meta-analytic results to inform AI literacy training and technology adoption strategies.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset provides foundational factor and portfolio return data used in empirical finance and asset pricing research. It contains: - Fama–French 3-Factor and 5-Factor models - Size (ME), Book-to-Market (B/M), Operating Profitability (OP), and Investment (Inv) portfolios - Bivariate portfolios (e.g., 2x3 Size-B/M sorts) - Industry portfolio returns All data originate from the Kenneth R. French Data Library and are based on CRSP and Compustat databases. Data are value-weighted and expressed in percentages.
Some files in this dataset contain header comments describing data sources and methodology (as shown below):
This file was created using the 202508 CRSP database.
The 1-month TBill rate data until 202405 are from Ibbotson Associates.
Starting from 202406, the 1-month TBill rate is from ICE BofA US 1-Month Treasury Bill Index.
To correctly read such files in Python (pandas), use the comment parameter — it automatically ignores all lines starting with a specific symbol (e.g., none here, so you can skip manually):
import pandas as pd
# Detect the first numeric line to find where data starts
file_path = "F-F_Research_Data_5_Factors_2x3.csv"
with open(file_path) as f:
lines = f.readlines()
# Find where the header line (column names) appears
for i, line in enumerate(lines):
if "Mkt-RF" in line:
skip_rows = i
break
df = pd.read_csv(file_path, skiprows=skip_rows, sep=r"\s+")
print(df.head())
df = pd.read_csv("F-F_Research_Data_5_Factors_2x3.csv", skiprows=3, sep=r"\s+")
#):df = pd.read_csv("F-F_Research_Data_5_Factors_2x3.csv", comment="#", sep=",")
| Column | Description |
|---|---|
Mkt-RF | Market excess return |
SMB | Small minus Big (size factor) |
HML | High minus Low (book-to-market factor) |
RMW | Robust minus Weak (profitability factor) |
CMA | Conservative minus Aggressive (investment factor) |
RF | Risk-free rate (1-month Treasury Bill) |
Facebook
TwitterBackgroundSmall sample sizes combined with multiple correlated endpoints pose a major challenge in the statistical analysis of preclinical neurotrauma studies. The standard approach of applying univariate tests on individual response variables has the advantage of simplicity of interpretation, but it fails to account for the covariance/correlation in the data. In contrast, multivariate statistical techniques might more adequately capture the multi-dimensional pathophysiological pattern of neurotrauma and therefore provide increased sensitivity to detect treatment effects.ResultsWe systematically evaluated the performance of univariate ANOVA, Welch’s ANOVA and linear mixed effects models versus the multivariate techniques, ANOVA on principal component scores and MANOVA tests by manipulating factors such as sample and effect size, normality and homogeneity of variance in computer simulations. Linear mixed effects models demonstrated the highest power when variance between groups was equal or variance ratio was 1:2. In contrast, Welch’s ANOVA outperformed the remaining methods with extreme variance heterogeneity. However, power only reached acceptable levels of 80% in the case of large simulated effect sizes and at least 20 measurements per group or moderate effects with at least 40 replicates per group. In addition, we evaluated the capacity of the ordination techniques, principal component analysis (PCA), redundancy analysis (RDA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) to capture patterns of treatment effects without formal hypothesis testing. While LDA suffered from a high false positive rate due to multicollinearity, PCA, RDA, and PLS-DA were robust and PLS-DA outperformed PCA and RDA in capturing a true treatment effect pattern.ConclusionsMultivariate tests do not provide an appreciable increase in power compared to univariate techniques to detect group differences in preclinical studies. However, PLS-DA seems to be a useful ordination technique to explore treatment effect patterns without formal hypothesis testing.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html
Facebook
Twitterhttps://spdx.org/licenses/etalab-2.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/etalab-2.0.html
This repository contains example scripts for estimating genetic parameters using the BLUPF90 software suite. The scripts handle up to four traits simultaneously (from the 15 available in the dataset data.txt found at https://doi.org/10.57745/4MI9JN ). script1.sh runs renumf90 using the parameter file renum_ex1.par. This file processes the traits LW, AFW, CW, and BMW. The model includes the effects of animal, sex, and slaughter date. Optional instructions allow blupf90+ to compute variance ratios and their standard errors. script2.sh follows a similar structure but analyzes the traits LW, BW14r, and BW26. In this case, the fixed effects used in the model are different. script3.sh runs a bivariate analysis, using a categorical data (LCAT) to describe the liver. Hence, it calls gibbsf90+ instead of blupf90+. Pay attention to the missing value code, which must be 0. gibbs_samples.R is a R program to read the output from gibbsf90+. One must provide the number of estimated components (here NCOMP = 6) and the program computes the variance ratios and their posterior distributions.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset is a univariate time-series dataset that records environmental noise levels along roads. It can be used for anomaly detection and forecasting tasks. The dataset includes numerical noise level data along with corresponding anomaly labels.
noise level (float64): Noise level (dB) label (int64): Anomaly label In this dataset, normal road traffic noise is assigned the label 0, while other anomalous sounds (non-road traffic noise) are assigned the label 1. This dataset can be used for noise analysis and anomaly detection in accordance with environmental standards.
Note:The teacher labels of the noise level data may not fully reflect fine variations in sound, potentially containing some degree of error. For example, even within a segment labeled as an anomaly, there may be a mix of periods when the anomalous sound is actually present and when it is absent.
This dataset can be utilized in the following research and experimental applications:
0 (normal noise) and label 1 (anomalous noise)noise_level_data.csv import pandas as pd
# Load the data
df = pd.read_csv("noise_level_data.csv")
# Check the first few rows
print(df.head())
Facebook
TwitterBiChroM Raw R Files1. Dataset and tree 2. Raw R files for optimizations 3. Full model optimizations 4. Reduced model optimizations 5. Profile rhoH and Profile rhoW 6. Bivariate profile rhoqH and Bivariate profile rhoqW 7. Raw R files for simulations 8. Simulations number of taxa 9. Simulations for tree heightBiChroMRawRfiles.zip
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The maximum association between two multivariate variables X and Y is defined as the maximal value that a bivariate association measure between one-dimensional projections αtX and βtY can attain. Taking the Pearson correlation as projection index results in the first canonical correlation coefficient. We propose to use more robust association measures, such as Spearman’s or Kendall’s rank correlation, or association measures derived from bivariate scatter matrices. We study the robustness of the proposed maximum association measures and the corresponding estimators of the coefficients yielding the maximum association. In the important special case of Y being univariate, maximum rank correlation estimators yield regression estimators that are invariant against monotonic transformations of the response. We obtain asymptotic variances for this special case. It turns out that maximum rank correlation estimators combine good efficiency and robustness properties. Simulations and a real data example illustrate the robustness and the power for handling nonlinear relationships of these estimators. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.shibatadb.com/license/data/proprietary/v1.0/license.txthttps://www.shibatadb.com/license/data/proprietary/v1.0/license.txt
Yearly citation counts for the publication titled "Interpreting Measured Serial Correlation In Univariate Time Series Analysis, With An Example From The New York Stock Exchange".
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
In the realm of time series prediction modeling, the window size (w) is a critical hyperparameter that determines the number of time units included in each example provided to a learning model. This hyperparameter is crucial because it allows the learning model to recognize both long-term and short-term trends, as well as seasonal patterns, while reducing sensitivity to random noise. This study aims to elucidate the impact of window size on the performance of machine learning algorithms in univariate time series forecasting tasks. To achieve this, we employed 40 time series from two different domains, conducting experiments with varying window sizes using four types of machine learning algorithms: Bagging, Boosting, Stacking, and a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) architecture. The results reveal that increasing the window size generally enhances the evaluation metric values up to a stabilization point, beyond which further increases do not significantly improve predictive accuracy. This stabilization effect was observed in both domains when w values exceeded 100 time steps. Moreover, the study found that RNN architectures do not consistently outperform ensemble models in various univariate time series forecasting scenarios.
Facebook
Twitterhttp://opendatacommons.org/licenses/dbcl/1.0/http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/dbcl/1.0/
The story behind the dataset is how to apply LSTM architecture to understand and apply multiple variables together to contribute more accuracy towards forecasting.
Air Pollution Forecasting The Air Quality dataset.
This is a dataset that reports on the weather and the level of pollution each hour for five years at the US embassy in Beijing, China.
The data includes the date-time, the pollution called PM2.5 concentration, and the weather information including dew point, temperature, pressure, wind direction, wind speed and the cumulative number of hours of snow and rain. The complete feature list in the raw data is as follows:
No: row number year: year of data in this row month: month of data in this row day: day of data in this row hour: hour of data in this row pm2.5: PM2.5 concentration DEWP: Dew Point TEMP: Temperature PRES: Pressure cbwd: Combined wind direction Iws: Cumulated wind speed Is: Cumulated hours of snow Ir: Cumulated hours of rain We can use this data and frame a forecasting problem where, given the weather conditions and pollution for prior hours, we forecast the pollution at the next hour.
Facebook
TwitterThis study was conducted to address the dropping rates in residential placements of adjudicated youth after the 1990s. Policymakers, advocates, and reseraches began to attirbute the decline to reform measures and proposed that this was the cause of the drop seen in historic national crime. In response, researchers set out to use state-level data on economic factors, crime rates, political ideology scores, and youth justice policies and practices to test the association between the youth justice policy environment and recent reductions in out-of-home placements for adjudicated youth. This data collection contains two files, a multivariate and bivariate analyses. In the multivariate file the aim was to assess the impact of the progressive policy characteristics on the dependent variable which is known as youth confinement. In the bivariate analyses file Wave 1-Wave 10 the aim was to assess the states as they are divided into 2 groups across all 16 dichotomized variables that comprised the progressive policy scale: those with more progressive youth justice environments and those with less progressive or punitive environments. Some examples of these dichotomized variables include purpose clause, courtroom shackling, and competency standard.
Facebook
TwitterAn example of combining ANOVA terms for bivariate principle component data to create the ANODIS F-statistic where N is the total number of samples drawn and K, the number of assemblages compared.