In 2024, most of the global website traffic was still generated by humans, but bot traffic is constantly growing. Fraudulent traffic through bad bot actors accounted for 37 percent of global web traffic in the most recently measured period, representing an increase of 12 percent from the previous year. Sophistication of Bad Bots on the rise The complexity of malicious bot activity has dramatically increased in recent years. Advanced bad bots have doubled in prevalence over the past 2 years, indicating a surge in the sophistication of cyber threats. Simultaneously, the share of simple bad bots drastically increased over the last years, suggesting a shift in the landscape of automated threats. Meanwhile, areas like food and groceries, sports, gambling, and entertainment faced the highest amount of advanced bad bots, with more than 70 percent of their bot traffic affected by evasive applications. Good and bad bots across industries The impact of bot traffic varies across different sectors. Bad bots accounted for over 50 percent of the telecom and ISPs, community and society, and computing and IT segments web traffic. However, not all bot traffic is considered bad. Some of these applications help index websites for search engines or monitor website performance, assisting users throughout their online search. Therefore, areas like entertainment, food and groceries, and even areas targeted by bad bots themselves experienced notable levels of good bot traffic, demonstrating the diverse applications of benign automated systems across different sectors.
hysts-bot-data/daily-papers-stats dataset hosted on Hugging Face and contributed by the HF Datasets community
In 2023, the majority of website traffic was still generated by humans but bot traffic is constantly increasing. Fraudulent traffic through bad bot actors accounted for 57.2 percent of web traffic in the gaming industry, a stark contrast to the mere 16.5 percent of bad bot traffic in the marketing segment. On the other hand, entertainment, food and groceries, and financial services were also categories with notable percentages of good bot traffic.
In 2023, the North America region saw the most significant year-over-year increase in human-initiated attack volume, over ** percent. The highest spike in automated bot attacks was seen in Latin America (LATAM) ** percent.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This is the data that was created by the OpenML R Bot that executed benchmark experiments on the dataset collection OpenML100 with six R algorithms: glmnet, rpart, kknn, svm, ranger and xgboost. The hyperparameters of these algorithms were drawn randomly. In total it contains more than 5 million benchmark experiments and can be used by other researchers. Each file is a table that for each benchmark experiment contains: OpenML-Task ID, hyperparameter values, performance masures (AUC, accuracy, brier score), runtime, scimark (runtime reference of the machine), and some meta features of the dataset.
http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/dbcl/1.0/http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/dbcl/1.0/
The data in question was generated using the Faker library and is not authentic real-world data. In recent years, there have been numerous reports suggesting the presence of bot voting practices that have resulted in manipulated outcomes within data science competitions. As a result of this, the idea for creating a simulated dataset arose. Although this is the first time that this dataset has been created, it is open to feedback and constructive criticism in order to improve its overall quality and significance.
NAME: The name of the individual. GENDER: The gender of the individual, either male or female. EMAIL_ID: The email address of the individual. IS_GLOGIN: A boolean indicating whether the individual used Google login to register or not. FOLLOWER_COUNT: The number of followers the individual has. FOLLOWING_COUNT: The number of individuals the individual is following. DATASET_COUNT: The number of datasets the individual has created. CODE_COUNT: The number of notebooks the individual has created. DISCUSSION_COUNT: The number of discussions the individual has participated in. AVG_NB_READ_TIME_MIN: The average time spent reading notebooks in minutes. REGISTRATION_IPV4: The IP address used to register. REGISTRATION_LOCATION: The location from where the individual registered. TOTAL_VOTES_GAVE_NB: The total number of votes the individual has given to notebooks. TOTAL_VOTES_GAVE_DS: The total number of votes the individual has given to datasets. TOTAL_VOTES_GAVE_DC: The total number of votes the individual has given to discussion comments. ISBOT: A boolean indicating whether the individual is a bot or not.
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
This dataset comprises a set of Twitter accounts in Singapore that are used for social bot profiling research conducted by the Living Analytics Research Centre (LARC) at Singapore Management University (SMU). Here a bot is defined as a Twitter account that generates contents and/or interacts with other users automatically (at least according to human judgment). In this research, Twitter bots have been categorized into three major types:
Broadcast bot. This bot aims at disseminating information to general audience by providing, e.g., benign links to news, blogs or sites. Such bot is often managed by an organization or a group of people (e.g., bloggers). Consumption bot. The main purpose of this bot is to aggregate contents from various sources and/or provide update services (e.g., horoscope reading, weather update) for personal consumption or use. Spam bot. This type of bots posts malicious contents (e.g., to trick people by hijacking certain account or redirecting them to malicious sites), or promotes harmless but invalid/irrelevant contents aggressively.
This categorization is general enough to cater for new, emerging types of bot (e.g., chatbots can be viewed as a special type of broadcast bots). The dataset was collected from 1 January to 30 April 2014 via the Twitter REST and streaming APIs. Starting from popular seed users (i.e., users having many followers), their follow, retweet, and user mention links were crawled. The data collection proceeds by adding those followers/followees, retweet sources, and mentioned users who state Singapore in their profile location. Using this procedure, a total of 159,724 accounts have been collected. To identify bots, the first step is to check active accounts who tweeted at least 15 times within the month of April 2014. These accounts were then manually checked and labelled, of which 589 bots were found. As many more human users are expected in the Twitter population, the remaining accounts were randomly sampled and manually checked. With this, 1,024 human accounts were identified. In total, this results in 1,613 labelled accounts. Related Publication: R. J. Oentaryo, A. Murdopo, P. K. Prasetyo, and E.-P. Lim. (2016). On profiling bots in social media. Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Informatics (SocInfo’16), 92-109. Bellevue, WA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47880-7_6
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This is a clean subset of the data that was created by the OpenML R Bot that executed benchmark experiments on binary classification task of the OpenML100 benchmarking suite with six R algorithms: glmnet, rpart, kknn, svm, ranger and xgboost. The hyperparameters of these algorithms were drawn randomly. In total it contains more than 2.6 million benchmark experiments and can be used by other researchers. The subset was created by taking 500000 results of each learner (except of kknn for which only 1140 results are available). The csv-file for each learner is a table that for each benchmark experiment has a row that contains: OpenML-Data ID, hyperparameter values, performance measures (AUC, accuracy, brier score), runtime, scimark (runtime reference of the machine), and some meta features of the dataset.OpenMLRandomBotResults.RData (format for R) contains all data in seperate tables for the results, the hyperparameters, the meta features, the runtime, the scimark results and reference results.
Financial overview and grant giving statistics of Invent-A-Bot Learning Center
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Online Social Networks (OSN) are used by millions of users, daily. This user-base shares and discovers different opinions on popular topics.
Social influence of large groups may be influenced by user believes or be attracted the interest in particular news or products. A large number of users, gathered in a single group or number of followers, increases the probability to influence OSN users.
Botnets, collections of automated accounts controlled by a single agent, are a common mechanism for exerting
maximum influence. Botnets may be used to better infiltrate the social graph over time and create an illusion of community
behaviour, amplifying their message and increasing persuasion.
This paper investigates Twitter botnets, their behavior, their interaction with user communities and their evolution over time.
We analyze a dense crawl of a subset of Twitter traffic, amounting to nearly all interactions by Greek-speaking Twitter users for a period
of 36 months.
The collected users are labeled as botnets, based on long term and frequent content similarity events. We detect over a million events, where seemingly unrelated accounts tweeted nearly identical content, at almost the same time. We filter these concurrent content injection events and detect a set of 1,850 accounts that repeatedly exhibit this pattern of behavior, suggesting that they are fully or in part controlled and orchestrated by the same entity. We find botnets that appear for brief intervals and disappear, as well as botnets that evolve and grow, spanning the duration of our dataset. We analyze statistical differences between the bot accounts and human users, as well as the botnet interactions with the user communities and the Twitter trending topics.
MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
huggingface-projects/bot-fight-data dataset hosted on Hugging Face and contributed by the HF Datasets community
In 2024, most of the worldwide website traffic is generated by humans but bot traffic is constantly increasing. Fraudulent traffic through bad bot actors also exists at various levels of sophistication. Over the last two years, the amount of advanced bad bots exploded, doubling what was registered in the previous years. However, simple bad bots have increased by almost 6 percent compared to the previous year, suggesting a decrease in the number of moderate bad bots.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
The electronic catalog of the botanical collection at the California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset is the code and data of the experiments involving networks of humans (1,024 subjects in 64 networks) playing a public-goods game to which we sometimes added autonomous agents (bots) programmed to use only local knowledge. We show that cooperation can not only be stabilized, but even promoted, when the bots intervene in the partner selections made by the humans themselves, re-shaping social connections locally within a larger group. The "code" directory has the R codes to analyze the experiment data at both group and individual level in the "data" directory. The dataset also has the raw data of each experiment session with the JSON format in the "data/raw" directory. The sub directory "exp1" has the data of experiment with 6 bot treatments and 1 additional bot visibility treatment. The sub directory "exp2" has the data of supplementary experiment with 1 single network-engineering bot having 5 ties.
https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/privacy-policy/
Bot Detection And Mitigation Software Market size was valued at USD 20.5 Billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 35.2 Billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 8.32% during the forecast period 2024-2031.
Global Bot Detection And Mitigation Software Market Drivers
The market drivers for the Bot Detection And Mitigation Software Market can be influenced by various factors. These may include:
Rising Incidence of Cyber Attacks: As the number and sophistication of cyber attacks increase, organizations are more aware of the threats posed by malicious bots. These bots can perpetrate a variety of harmful activities such as data theft, DDoS (Distributed Denial-of-Service) attacks, and fraudulent transactions. Therefore, there's a heightened demand for software solutions that can detect and mitigate these bot-related threats. Expansion of E-commerce and Online Services: The growth of e-commerce platforms and online services has led to an increased volume of online activities that can be targeted by bots. For instance, bots can be used for price scraping, inventory hoarding, and performing fraudulent transactions. To safeguard the integrity and performance of their platforms, businesses invest in bot detection and mitigation solutions. Increased Adoption of APIs: APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) are increasingly being used to enable interconnectivity between different software services and applications. This widespread use makes them susceptible to bot attacks that can exploit vulnerabilities or abuse the API functionality. Consequently, there's a rising need for bot detection solutions specifically designed to protect APIs. Regulatory Compliance and Data Protection: With stringent regulations like GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) and CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act) around data protection and privacy, companies are required to implement robust security measures to protect user data. Bot detection and mitigation software can help organizations comply with these regulations by preventing unwanted access and data breaches through malicious bots. Advancements in Machine Learning and AI: Advances in machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) have enhanced the capabilities of bot detection solutions. These technologies enable the development of more sophisticated and accurate systems that can identify and adapt to the evolving behaviors of bots. As a result, companies are more inclined to adopt these cutting-edge solutions for better protection. Growing Concerns Over Ad Fraud: In the digital advertising industry, ad fraud perpetrated by bots is a significant concern. This includes fraudulent clicks, impressions, and conversions generated by bots to deceive advertisers and drain their advertising budgets. To combat this, advertisers and ad networks are increasingly relying on bot detection software to ensure the authenticity of their ad traffic. Increase in Online Transactions: The surge in online transactions, particularly due to the rise of digital payment methods and mobile banking, has made financial services a primary target for bot attacks. Bots can be used for credential stuffing, account takeover, and transaction fraud. Thus, financial institutions are investing heavily in bot mitigation solutions to secure their online platforms. Enhanced User Experience: Bots can significantly degrade user experience by slowing down website performance, causing downtime, and making it difficult for legitimate users to access services. Companies aim to maintain a seamless and efficient user experience by implementing bot detection and mitigation solutions to keep their platforms running smoothly. Increasing Awareness and Education: There is a growing awareness among businesses about the potential risks associated with bot activities and the importance of having robust defenses in place. As more organizations understand the impact of bot attacks, they are more likely to invest in comprehensive bot detection and mitigation solutions. Global Digital Transformation: As businesses and governments around the world undergo digital transformation, the importance of securing digital infrastructure becomes paramount. Bots pose a significant threat to these digital ecosystems, necessitating the need for effective bot detection and mitigation measures to protect critical infrastructure and services.
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
NF-BoT-IoT is the Netflow version of the UNSW-Bot-IoT dataset. This is one dataset in the NF-collection by the university of Queensland aimed at standardizing network-security datasets to achieve interoperability and larger analyses.
All credit goes to the original authors: Dr. Mohanad Sarhan, Dr. Siamak Layeghy, Dr. Nour Moustafa & Dr. Marius Portmann. Please cite their original conference article when using this dataset.
V1: Base dataset in CSV format as downloaded from here V2: Cleaning -> parquet files
In the parquet files all data types are already set correctly, there are 0 records with missing information and 0 duplicate records.
Statistical analysis of Nesting Bot usage patterns in Jeskai Standard format decks
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Thailand BOT: Number of Job Vacancies data was reported at 29,033.000 Person in Sep 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 26,027.000 Person for Aug 2018. Thailand BOT: Number of Job Vacancies data is updated monthly, averaging 39,095.000 Person from Jan 1995 (Median) to Sep 2018, with 285 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 115,636.000 Person in Feb 2004 and a record low of 12,620.000 Person in Mar 2007. Thailand BOT: Number of Job Vacancies data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Bank of Thailand. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Thailand – Table TH.G012: Employment Indicators.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
This project examines how to enhance users' exposure to and engagement with verified and ideologically balanced news in an ecologically valid setting. We rely on a large-scale two-week long field experiment on 28,457 Twitter users. We created 28 bots utilizing GPT-2 that replied to users tweeting about sports, entertainment, or lifestyle with a contextual reply containing two hardcoded elements: a URL to the topic-relevant section of quality news organization and an encouragement to follow its Twitter account. Treated users were randomly assigned to receive responses by bots presented as female or male. We examine whether our intervention enhances the following of news media organization, the sharing/liking of news content and the tweeting/liking of political content. We find that the treated users followed more news accounts and the users in the female bot treatment were more likely to like news content than the control.
In 2024, most of the global website traffic was still generated by humans, but bot traffic is constantly growing. Fraudulent traffic through bad bot actors accounted for 37 percent of global web traffic in the most recently measured period, representing an increase of 12 percent from the previous year. Sophistication of Bad Bots on the rise The complexity of malicious bot activity has dramatically increased in recent years. Advanced bad bots have doubled in prevalence over the past 2 years, indicating a surge in the sophistication of cyber threats. Simultaneously, the share of simple bad bots drastically increased over the last years, suggesting a shift in the landscape of automated threats. Meanwhile, areas like food and groceries, sports, gambling, and entertainment faced the highest amount of advanced bad bots, with more than 70 percent of their bot traffic affected by evasive applications. Good and bad bots across industries The impact of bot traffic varies across different sectors. Bad bots accounted for over 50 percent of the telecom and ISPs, community and society, and computing and IT segments web traffic. However, not all bot traffic is considered bad. Some of these applications help index websites for search engines or monitor website performance, assisting users throughout their online search. Therefore, areas like entertainment, food and groceries, and even areas targeted by bad bots themselves experienced notable levels of good bot traffic, demonstrating the diverse applications of benign automated systems across different sectors.