boxplot data

Boxplots have become an extremely popular display of distribution summaries for collections of data, especially when we need to visualize summaries for several collections simultaneously. The whiskers in the boxplot show only the extent of the tails for most of the data (with outside values denoted separately); more detailed information about the shape of the tails, such as skewness and “weight” relative to a standard reference distribution, is much better displayed via quantile–quantile (q-q) plots. We incorporate the q-q plot’s tail information into the traditional boxplot by replacing the boxplot’s whiskers with the tails from a q-q plot, and display these tails with confidence bands for the tails that would be expected from the tails of the reference distribution. We describe the construction of the “q-q boxplot” and demonstrate its advantages over earlier proposed boxplot modifications on data from economics and neuroscience, which illustrate the q-q boxplots’ effectiveness in showing important tail behavior especially for large datasets. The package qqboxplot (an extension to the ggplot2 package) is available for the R programming language. Supplementary files for this article are available online.

This paper introduces the sparse functional boxplot and the intensity sparse functional boxplot as practical exploratory tools. Besides being available for complete functional data, they can be used in sparse univariate and multivariate functional data. The sparse functional boxplot, based on the functional boxplot, displays sparseness proportions within the 50% central region. The intensity sparse functional boxplot indicates the relative intensity of fitted sparse point patterns in the central region. The two-stage functional boxplot, which derives from the functional boxplot to detect outliers, is furthermore extended to its sparse form. We also contribute to sparse data fitting improvement and sparse multivariate functional data depth. In a simulation study, we evaluate the goodness of data fitting, several depth proposals for sparse multivariate functional data, and compare the results of outlier detection between the sparse functional boxplot and its two-stage version. The practical applications of the sparse functional boxplot and intensity sparse functional boxplot are illustrated with two public health datasets. Supplementary materials and codes are available for readers to apply our visualization tools and replicate the analysis.

The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the U.S. Geological Survey have developed projected future change factors for precipitation depth-duration-frequency (DDF) curves at 174 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlas 14 stations in central and south Florida. The change factors were computed as the ratio of projected future to historical extreme precipitation depths fitted to extreme precipitation data from various downscaled climate datasets using a constrained maximum likelihood (CML) approach. The change factors correspond to the period 2050-2089 (centered in the year 2070) as compared to the 1966-2005 historical period. An R script (create_boxplot.R) is provided which generates boxplots of change factors for a NOAA Atlas 14 station, or for all NOAA Atlas 14 stations in an ArcHydro Enhanced Database (AHED) basin or county for durations of interest (1, 3, and 7 days, or combinations thereof) and return periods of interest (5, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 200 years, or combinations thereof). The user also has the option of requesting that the script save the raw change factor data used to generate the boxplots, as well as the processed quantile and outlier data shown in the figure. The script allows the user to modify the percentiles used in generating the boxplots. A Microsoft Word file documenting code usage and available options is also provided within this data release (Documentation_R_script_create_boxplot.docx). As described in the documentation, the R script relies on some of the Microsoft Excel spreadsheets published as part of this data release.

The Florida Flood Hub for Applied Research and Innovation and the U.S. Geological Survey have developed projected future change factors for precipitation depth-duration-frequency (DDF) curves at 242 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlas 14 stations in Florida. The change factors were computed as the ratio of projected future to historical extreme-precipitation depths fitted to extreme-precipitation data from downscaled climate datasets using a constrained maximum likelihood (CML) approach as described in https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20225093. The change factors correspond to the periods 2020-59 (centered in the year 2040) and 2050-89 (centered in the year 2070) as compared to the 1966-2005 historical period.
An R script (create_boxplot.R) is provided which generates boxplots of change factors for a NOAA Atlas 14 station, or for all NOAA Atlas 14 stations in a Florida HUC-8 basin or county for durations of interest (1, 3, and 7 days, or combinations thereof) ...

Estimate of Median Household Income for Box Butte County, NE was 66613.00000 $ in January of 2023, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, Estimate of Median Household Income for Box Butte County, NE reached a record high of 66762.00000 in January of 2022 and a record low of 31555.00000 in January of 1989. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Estimate of Median Household Income for Box Butte County, NE - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on November of 2025.

Estimate of Median Household Income for Box Elder County, UT was 83493.00000 $ in January of 2023, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, Estimate of Median Household Income for Box Elder County, UT reached a record high of 83493.00000 in January of 2023 and a record low of 35454.00000 in January of 1989. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Estimate of Median Household Income for Box Elder County, UT - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on November of 2025.

The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) have evaluated projections of future droughts for south Florida based on climate model output from the Multivariate Adaptive Constructed Analogs (MACA) downscaled climate dataset from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). The MACA dataset includes both Representative Concentration Pathways 4.5 and 8.5 (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5). A Portable Document Format (PDF) file is provided which presents boxplots of future overall drought-event characteristics based on 6-mo. and 12-mo. averaged balance anomaly timeseries derived from climate models downscaled by the MACA method assuming the historical-standard stomatal resistance (rs). Overall cumulative drought-event characteristics during the future period 2056-95 are provided as boxplots for four regions: (1) the entire South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), (2) the Lower West Coast (LWC) water supply region, (3) the Lower East ...

Estimate, Median Age by Sex, Total Population (5-year estimate) in Box Butte County, NE was 40.70000 Years of Age in January of 2023, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, Estimate, Median Age by Sex, Total Population (5-year estimate) in Box Butte County, NE reached a record high of 42.70000 in January of 2009 and a record low of 39.40000 in January of 2019. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Estimate, Median Age by Sex, Total Population (5-year estimate) in Box Butte County, NE - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on November of 2025.

Figure S1. CRISPR-KO screening data quality assessment. (A) Average correlation between sgRNAs read-count replicates across cell lines. (B) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve obtained from classifying fitness essential (FE) and non-essential genes based on the average logFC of their targeting sgRNAs. An example cell line OVCAR-8 is shown. (C) Area under the ROC (AUROC) curve obtained for cell lines from classifying FE and non-essential genes based on the average logFC of their targeting sgRNAs. (D) Recall for sets of a priori known essential genes from MSigDB and from literature when classifying FE and non-essential genes across cell lines (5% FDR). Each circle represents a cell line and coloured by tissue type. Box and whisker plots show median, inter-quartile ranges and 95% confidence intervals. (E) Genes ranked based on the average logFC of targeting sgRNAs for OVCAR-8 and enrichment of genes belonging to predefined sets of a priori known essential genes from MSigDB, at an FDR equal to 5% when classifying FE (second last column) and non-essential genes (last column). Blue numbers at the bottom indicate the classification true positive rate (recall). Figure S2. Assessment of copy number bias before and after CRISPRcleanR correction across cell lines. sgRNA logFC values before and after CRISPRcleanR for eight cell lines are shown classified based on copy number (amplified or deleted) and expression status. Copy number segments were identified using Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) and Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) datasets. Box and whisker plots show median, inter-quartile ranges and 95% confidence intervals. Asterisks indicate significant associations between sgRNA LogFC values (Welchs t-test, p < 0,005) and their different effect sizes accounting for the standard deviation (Cohen’s D value), compared to the whole sgRNA library. Figure S3. CN-associated effect on sgRNA logFC values in highly biased cell lines. For 3 cell lines, recall curves of non-essential genes, fitness essential genes, copy number (CN) amplified and CN amplified non-expressed genes obtained when classifying genes based on the average logFC values of their targeting sgRNAs. Figure S4. Assessment of CN-associated bias across all cell lines. LogFC values of sgRNAs averaged within segments of equal copy number (CN). One plot per cell line, with CN values at which a significant differences (Welchs t-test, p < 0.05) with respect to the logFCs corresponding to CN = 2 are initially observed (bias starting point) and start to significantly increase continuously (bias critical point). CN-associated bias is shown for all sgRNA, when excluding FE genes and histones, and for non-expressed genes only. Box and whisker plots show median, inter-quartile ranges and 95% confidence intervals. Figure S5. CRISPRcleanR correction varying the minimal number of genes required and the effect of fitness essential genes. Recall reduction of (A) amplified or (B) amplified not-expressed genes versus that of fitness essential and other prior known essential genes, when comparing CRISPRcleanR correction varying the minimal number of genes to be targeted by sgRNA in a biased segment (default parameter is n = 3). Similar results were observed when performing the analysis including or excluding known essential genes. Figure S6. CRISPRcleanR performances across 342 cell lines from an independent dataset. Recall at 5% FDR of predefined sets of genes based on their uncorrected or corrected logFCs (coordinates on the two axis) averaged across targeting sgRNAs for 342 cell lines from the Project Achilles. Figure S7. CRISPRcleanR performances in relation to data quality. The impact of data quality on recall at 5% false discovery rate (FDR) assessed following CRISPRcleanR correction for predefined set of genes. Project Achilles data (n = 342 cell lines) was binned based on the quality of uncorrected essentiality profile. This is obtained by measuring the recall at 5% FDR for predefined essential genes (from the Molecular Signature Database) and grouping the cell lines in 10 equidistant bins (1 lowest quality and 10 highest quality) when sorting them based on this value. Recall increment for fitness essential genes was greatest for the lower quality data, indicating that CRISPRcleanR can improve true signal of gene depletion in low quality data. Figure S8. Minimal impact of CRISPRcleanR on loss/gain-of-fitness effects. (A) The percentage of genes where the significance of their fitness effect (gain- or loss-of-fitness) is altered after CRISPRcleanR for Project Score and Project Achilles data. The upper row shows correction effects for all screened genes and the lower row for the subset of genes with a significant effect in the uncorrected data. Each dot is a separate cell line. Blue dots indicate the percentage of genes where significance is lost or gained post correction. Green dots indicate the percentage of genes where the fitness effect is distorted and the effect is opposite in the uncorrected data. (B) The majority of the loss-of-fitness genes impacted by correction are putative false positive effects affecting genes which are either not-expressed (FPKM < 0.5), amplified, known non-essential, or exhibit a mild phenotype in the screening data. (C) Summary of overall impact of CRISPRcleanR on fitness effects following correction when considering data for all cell lines. The colors reflect the percentage of genes with a loss-of-fitness, no phenotype or gain-of-fitness effect which are retained in the corrected data. Figure S9. CRISPRcleanR retains cancer driver gene dependencies in Project Score and Achilles data. (A) Each circle represents a tested cancer driver gene dependency (mutation or amplification of a copy number segment) and the statistical significance using MaGeCK before (x-axis) and after (y-axis) CRISPRcleanR correction, across the two screens. Plots in the first row show depletion FDR values pre/post-correction, whereas those in the second row show depletion FDR values pre-correction and enrichment FDR values post-correction. (B) Details of the tested genetic dependencies and whether they are shared before and after CRISPRcleanR correction at two different thresholds of statistical significance (5 and 10% FDR, respectively for 1st and 2nd row of plots). The third row indicates the type of alteration involving the cancer driver genes under consideration and the total number of cell lines with an alteration. (ZIP 191 kb)

This dataset is about: Boxplots and matrix of Fourier coefficients. Please consult parent dataset @ https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.803659 for more information.

Graph and download economic data for Estimate, Median Age by Sex, Total Population (5-year estimate) in Box Elder County, UT (B01002001E049003) from 2009 to 2023 about Box Elder County, UT; age; UT; 5-year; median; and USA.

Estimate, Median Age by Sex, Total Population (5-year estimate) in Box Elder County, UT was 32.90000 Years of Age in January of 2023, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, Estimate, Median Age by Sex, Total Population (5-year estimate) in Box Elder County, UT reached a record high of 33.10000 in January of 2022 and a record low of 30.20000 in January of 2010. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Estimate, Median Age by Sex, Total Population (5-year estimate) in Box Elder County, UT - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on November of 2025.

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), collects data pertaining to the surface-water resources of Missouri. These data are collected as part of the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network (AWQMN) and are stored and maintained by the USGS National Water Information System (NWIS) database. These data constitute a valuable source of reliable, impartial, and timely information for developing an improved understanding of the water resources of the State. Water-quality data collected between water years 1993 and 2017 were analyzed for long term trends and the network was investigated to identify data gaps or redundant data to assist MDNR on how to optimize the network in the future. This is a companion data release product to the Scientific Investigation Report: Richards, J.M., and Barr, M.N., 2021, General water-quality conditions, long-term trends, and network analysis at selected sites within the Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network in Missouri, water years 1993–2017: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2021–5079, 75 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215079. The following selected tables are included in this data release in compressed (.zip) format: AWQMN_EGRET_data.xlsx -- Data retrieved from the USGS National Water Information System database that was quality assured and conditioned for network analysis of the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network AWQMN_R-QWTREND_data.xlsx -- Data retrieved from the USGS National Water Information System database that was quality assured and conditioned for analysis of flow-weighted trends for selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network AWQMN_R-QWTREND_outliers.xlsx -- Data flagged as outliers during analysis of flow-weighted trends for selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network AWQMN_R-QWTREND_outliers_quarterly.xlsx -- Data flagged as outliers during analysis of flow-weighted trends using a simulated quarterly sampling frequency dataset for selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network AWQMN_descriptive_statistics_WY1993-2017.xlsx -- Descriptive statistics for selected water-quality parameters at selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network The following selected graphics are included in this data release in .pdf format. Also included in this data release are web pages accessible for people with disabilities provided in compressed .zip format. The web pages present the same information as the .pdf files: Annual and seasonal discharge trends.pdf -- Graphics of discharge trends produced from the EGRET software for selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network. Graphics provided to support the interpretations in the Scientific Investigations Report. Annual_and_seasonal_discharge_trends_htm.zip -- Compressed web page presenting graphics of discharge trends produced from the EGRET software for selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network. Graphics provided to support the interpretations in the Scientific Investigations Report. Graphics of simulated quarterly sampling frequency trends.pdf -- Graphics of results of simulated quarterly sampling frequency trends produced by the R-QWTREND software at selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network. Graphics provided to support the interpretations in the Scientific Investigations Report. Graphics_of_simulated_quarterly_sampling_frequency_trends_htm.zip -- Compressed web page presenting graphics of results of simulated quarterly sampling frequency trends produced by the R-QWTREND software at selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network. Graphics provided to support the interpretations in the Scientific Investigations Report. Graphics of median parameter values.pdf -- Graphics of median values for selected parameters at selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network. Graphics provided to support the interpretations in the Scientific Investigations Report. Graphics_of_median_parameter_values_htm.zip -- Compressed web page presenting graphics of median values for selected parameters at selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network. Graphics provided to support the interpretations in the Scientific Investigations Report. Parameter value versus time.pdf -- Scatter plots of the value of selected parameters versus time at selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network. Graphics provided to support the interpretations in the Scientific Investigations Report. Parameter_value_versus_time_htm.zip -- Compressed web page presenting scatter plots of the value of selected parameters versus time at selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network. Graphics provided to support the interpretations in the Scientific Investigations Report. Parameter value versus discharge.pdf -- Scatter plots of the value of selected parameters versus discharge at selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network. Graphics provided to support the interpretations in the Scientific Investigations Report. Parameter_value_versus_discharge_htm.zip -- Compressed web page presenting scatter plots of the value of selected parameters versus discharge at selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network. Graphics provided to support the interpretations in the Scientific Investigations Report. Boxplot of parameter value distribution by season.pdf -- Seasonal boxplots of selected parameters from selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network. Seasons defined as Winter (December, January, and February), Spring (March, April, and May), Summer (June, July, and August), and Fall (September, October, and November). Graphics provided to support the interpretations in the Scientific Investigations Report. Boxplot_of_parameter_value_distribution_by_season_htm.zip -- Compressed web page presenting seasonal boxplots of selected parameters from selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network. Seasons defined as Winter (December, January, and February), Spring (March, April, and May), Summer (June, July, and August), and Fall (September, October, and November). Graphics provided to support the interpretations in the Scientific Investigations Report. Boxplot of sampled discharge compared with mean daily discharge.pdf -- Boxplots of the distribution of discharge collected at the time of sampling of selected parameters compared with the period of record discharge distribution from selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network. Graphics provided to support the interpretations in the Scientific Investigations Report. Boxplot_of_sampled_discharge_compared_with_mean_daily_discharge_htm.zip -- Compressed web page presenting boxplots of the distribution of discharge collected at the time of sampling of selected parameters compared with the period of record discharge distribution from selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network. Graphics provided to support the interpretations in the Scientific Investigations Report. Boxplot of parameter value distribution by month.pdf -- Monthly boxplots of selected parameters from selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network. Graphics provided to support the interpretations in the Scientific Investigations Report. Boxplot_of_parameter_value_distribution_by_month_htm.zip -- Compressed web page presenting monthly boxplots of selected parameters from selected sites in the Missouri Ambient Water-Quality Monitoring Network. Graphics provided to support the interpretations in the Scientific Investigations Report.

List of annotated peaksets represented in the boxplots.

A summary of the outliers from the boxplots in figures 1 to 6 and 8 to 10.

Boxplots showing responses associated with the timing of seedling emergence and extent of mycorrhizal colonization.

The Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators (CESI) program provides data and information to track Canada's performance on key environmental sustainability issues. The Nutrients in the St. Lawrence River indicator reports on the status of total phosphorus and total nitrogen concentrations along the St. Lawrence River. It rates total nitrogen and total phosphorus status based on whether total phosphorus and total nitrogen concentrations exceed Quebec's total phosphorus water quality guideline for the protection of aquatic life and a total nitrogen water quality guideline for the protection of aquatic life specific to the St. Lawrence River. Exceeding a water quality guideline suggests a greater risk to the health of the St. Lawrence River ecosystem posed by phosphorus and/or nitrogen.Information is provided to Canadians in a number of formats including: static and interactive maps, charts and graphs, HTML and CSV data tables and downloadable reports. See supplementary documentation for data sources and details on how those data were collected and how the indicator was calculated.

Boxplots displaying the range in lidar and optical predictor values relative to bird habitat quality indices.

Context

Indian Premier League (IPL) is a Twenty20 cricket format league in India. It is usually played in April and May every year. As of 2019, the title sponsor of the game is Vivo. The league was founded by Board of Control for Cricket India (BCCI) in 2008.

Content

• Data till Season 11 (2008 - 2019)
• matches.csv - Match by match data
• deliveries.csv - Ball by ball data

Acknowledgements

• Data source from 2008-2017 - CricSheet.org and Manas - Kaggle
• Data source for 2018-2019 - IPL T20 - Official website

Inspiration

Draw analysis, player/team performance, apply and learn statistical methods on real data

Kernels

Statistics

• Summarizing quantitative data (mean, median, std. deviation, percentile, box plots etc.)
• Distributions - Cumulative relative frequency, Normal distribution, PDF, Z-score, empirical rule, binomial distribution, Bernoulli distribution
• Bivariate data - Scatter plot, Correlation, Covariance, Least square regression, R-Squared, Root mean square error