In 2023, it is estimated that the BRICS countries have a combined population of 3.25 billion people, which is over 40 percent of the world population. The majority of these people live in either China or India, which have a population of more than 1.4 billion people each, while the other three countries have a combined population of just under 420 million. Comparisons Although the BRICS countries are considered the five foremost emerging economies, they are all at various stages of the demographic transition and have different levels of population development. For all of modern history, China has had the world's largest population, but rapidly dropping fertility and birth rates in recent decades mean that its population growth has slowed. In contrast, India's population growth remains much higher, and it is expected to overtake China in the next few years to become the world's most populous country. The fastest growing population in the BRICS bloc, however, is that of South Africa, which is at the earliest stage of demographic development. Russia, is the only BRICS country whose population is currently in decline, and it has been experiencing a consistent natural decline for most of the past three decades. Growing populations = growing opportunities Between 2000 and 2026, the populations of the BRICS countries is expected to grow by 625 million people, and the majority of this will be in India and China. As the economies of these two countries grow, so too do living standards and disposable income; this has resulted in the world's two most populous countries emerging as two of the most profitable markets in the world. China, sometimes called the "world's factory" has seen a rapid growth in its middle class, increased potential of its low-tier market, and its manufacturing sector is now transitioning to the production of more technologically advanced and high-end goods to meet its domestic demand.

Since 2000, Russia has consistently had the lowest population growth rate of the BRICS countries, and it even experienced a population decline throughout most of the 2000s, and again in the late 2010s. For Brazil, China, and India, population growth has gradually fallen over time, as their demographic development progresses. South Africa has had the highest population growth rate since 2010, as its population recovered from the initial impact of the HIV/AIDS pandemic, before it started falling as birth rates fall more in line with death rates.

The aim of the article is to compare health system outcomes in the BRICS countries, assess the trends of their changes in 2000−2017, and verify whether they are in any way correlated with the economic context. The indicators considered were: nominal and per capita current health expenditure, government health expenditure, gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, GDP growth, unemployment, inflation, and composition of GDP. The study covered five countries of the BRICS group over a period of 18 years. We decided to characterize countries covered with a dataset of selected indicators describing population health status, namely: life expectancy at birth, level of immunization, infant mortality rate, maternal mortality ratio, and tuberculosis case detection rate. We constructed a unified synthetic measure depicting the performance of individual health systems in terms of their outcomes with a single numerical value. Descriptive statistical analysis of quantitative traits consisted of the arithmetic mean (xsr), standard deviation (SD), and, where needed, the median. The normality of the distribution of variables was tested with the Shapiro–Wilk test. Spearman's rho and Kendall tau rank coefficients were used for correlation analysis between measures. The correlation analyses have been supplemented with factor analysis. We found that the best results in terms of health care system performance were recorded in Russia, China, and Brazil. India and South Africa are noticeably worse. However, the entire group performs visibly worse than the developed countries. The health system outcomes appeared to correlate on a statistically significant scale with health expenditures per capita, governments involvement in health expenditures, GDP per capita, and industry share in GDP; however, these correlations are relatively weak, with the highest strength in the case of government's involvement in health expenditures and GDP per capita. Due to weak correlation with economic background, other factors may play a role in determining health system outcomes in BRICS countries. More research should be recommended to find them and determine to what extent and how exactly they affect health system outcomes.

Since the beginning of the 21st century, the BRICS countries have been considered the five foremost developing economies in the world. Originally, the term BRIC was used by economists when talking about the emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India, and China, however these countries have held annual summits since 2009, and the group has expanded to include South Africa since 2010. China has the largest GDP of the BRICS country, at 16.86 trillion U.S. dollars in 2021, while the others are all below three trillion. Combined, the BRICS bloc has a GDP over 25.85 trillion U.S. dollars in 2022, which is slightly more than the United States. BRICS economic development China has consistently been the largest economy of this bloc, and its rapid growth has seen it become the second largest economy in the world, behind the U.S.. China's growth has also been much faster than the other BRICS countries; for example, when compared with the second largest BRICS economy, its GDP was less than double the size of Brazil's in 2000, but is almost six times larger than India's in 2021. Since 2000, the country with the second largest GDP has fluctuated between Brazil, Russia, and India, due to a variety of factors, although India has held this position since 2015 (when the other two experienced recession), and it's growth rate is on track to surpass China's in the coming decade. South Africa has consistently had the smallest economy of the BRICS bloc, and it has just the third largest economy in Africa; its inclusion in this group is due to the fact that it is the most advanced and stable major economy in Africa, and it holds strategic importance due to the financial potential of the continent in the coming decades. Future developments It is predicted that China's GDP will overtake that of the U.S. by the end of the 2020s, to become the largest economy in the world, while some also estimate that India will also overtake the U.S. around the middle of the century. Additionally, the BRICS group is more than just an economic or trading bloc, and its New Development Bank was established in 2014 to invest in sustainable infrastructure and renewable energy across the globe. While relations between its members were often strained or of less significance in the 20th century, their current initiatives have given them a much greater international influence. The traditional great powers represented in the Group of Seven (G7) have seen their international power wane in recent decades, while BRICS countries have seen theirs grow, especially on a regional level. Today, the original BRIC countries combine with the Group of Seven (G7), to make up 11 of the world's 12 largest economies, but it is predicted that they will move further up on this list in the coming decades.

In 2021, the BRICS countries with the highest estimated GDP per capita were Russia and China, with between 12,000 and 13,000 U.S. dollars per person. Brazil and South Africa's GDP per capita are thought to be closer to the 7,000 mark, while India's GDP per capita is just over 2,000 U.S. dollars. This a significant contrast to figures for overall GDP, where China has the largest economy by a significant margin, while India's is the second largest. The reason for this disparity is due to population size. For example, both China's population and overall GDP are roughly 10 times larger than those of Russia, which results in them having a comparable GDP per capita. Additionally, India's population is 23 times larger than South Africa's, but it's GDP is just seven times larger; this results in South Africa having a higher GDP per capita than India, despite it being the smallest of the BRICS economies.

The BRICS countries overtook the G7 countries share of the world's total gross domestic product (GDP) in terms of purchasing power parity (PPP) in 2018. By 2024, the difference had increased even further, the BRICS now holding a total 35 percent of the world's GDP compared to 30 percent held by the G7 countries.

This statistic displays the results of the worldwide Made-In-Country Index 2017, a survey conducted to show how positively products "made in..." are perceived in various countries all over the world. For this statistic, respondents were asked about attributes they associate with products made in Russia. 17 percent of respondents stated they associate "advanced technology" with products from Russia.

Context

The purpose behind this dataset was, initially, to visualize, compare and understand how emerging economies are developing, both in relation to each other and internally. Since the data provided by The World Bank is very insightful, I've decided to gather it in a standardized and updated format and upload it, so others can also provide us with better analysis and, perhaps, better insights into each country's economies.

Content

This dataset contains 5 files: Economy, EducationAndEnvironment, HealthAndPoverty, PrivateSector and PublicSector data. All files are formatted in the following structure:

SeriesName | SeriesCode | CountryName | CountryCode | Year | Value

Acknowledgements

The data present in this dataset is only possible due to the work and services of https://databank.worldbank.org.

Inspiration

Is it possible to extract some fundamental correlations between emerging economies and their impacts on social welfare? What are the relations between a country's education expenditure and their employment rate? What other aspects of society can we better understand through this data and avoid common pitfalls that have occurred to other countries?

This ranking displays the results of the worldwide Made-In-Country Index 2017, a survey conducted to show how positively products "made in..." are perceived in various countries all over the world. During this survey, 12 percent of respondents from Canada perceived products made in Russia as "slightly positive" or "very positive".

This ranking displays the results of the worldwide Made-In-Country Index 2017, a survey conducted to show how positively products "made in..." are perceived in various countries all over the world. During this survey, 75 percent of respondents from Russia perceived products made in Japan as "slightly positive" or "very positive". The survey indicates that Japanese products have the strongest reputation in Russia, followed by German products.

IntroductionEsophageal cancer represents a substantial global health challenge. Given their diverse socio-economic profiles and large populations, the BRICS countries are pivotal in elucidating the burden of this disease. Nonetheless, limited research has systematically examined the trends of esophageal cancer within these nations.MethodThis research utilized data from the GBD database, encompassing ASIR, ASPR, ASMR, ASDR, and 95% UI. The EAPC was employed to assess trends, while the BAPC model was used to project future trends. Four risk factors were examined, and health inequalities were evaluated using SII and CI.ResultIn 2021, China reported the highest rates across all metrics among BRICS countries, whereas Egypt exhibited the lowest rates in most cases. Smoking was identified as the predominant factor contributing to esophageal cancer mortality and DALYs in the majority of countries. Ethiopia demonstrated the highest proportion of cases attributable to a diet low in vegetables, India to tobacco chewing, and Russia to alcohol consumption. Health inequalities between countries were observed to be gradually narrowing. Projections indicate that from 2021 to 2030, Egypt, Iran, and South Africa will experience declines across all rates. Brazil, Russia, India, and the UAE are expected to see reductions in ASIR, ASPR, and ASDR but increases in ASMR. Conversely, China’s ASIR, ASPR, and ASMR are projected to rise, except for ASDR. In Saudi Arabia, ASPR and ASMR are anticipated to increase, while ASIR and ASDR will decrease. Ethiopia is expected to witness increases in most rates.ConclusionThis study examined the burden of esophageal cancer in BRICS countries. Recognizing the disparities across multiple dimensions can aid these nations in formulating more effective public health strategies and optimizing resource allocation, both of which are essential for the prevention and control of the disease.

Cette statistique présente l’évolution de la population totale des pays adhérant au BRIC, BRICS puis BRICS+ de 2009 à 2023, avec des prévisions jusqu’à 2028. Le groupe BRIC, réuni pour la première fois en 2009, comptait le Brésil, la Russie, l’Inde et la Chine. Le groupe s’élargit en 2011 avec l’adhésion de l’Afrique du Sud, puis en 2024 avec l’adhésion de l’Arabie saoudite, des Émirats arabes unis, de l’Iran, de l’Égypte et de l’Éthiopie. Les 10 pays réunissent presque la moitié de la population mondiale.

The Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities and Flood Mitigation Assistance Obligations Dashboard uses publicly available data from OpenFEMA enable users to explore information about Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities and Flood Mitigation Assistance subapplications in their area. The dashboard includes four different options for viewing subapplications data from these two programs from Fiscal Year 2020 – Present: Nationwide - subapplications and obligations at the national level. State/Territory - subapplications and obligations specific to states and territories. County - subapplications and obligations specific to the thousands of counties and county-equivalents (parishes, municipalities, etc.). Tribal-Specific - subapplications and obligations for Tribal Nations. There are also five layers not related to obligations in the map, which are listed below. By overlaying the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities and Flood Mitigation Assistance obligations data and these three layers, users can compare Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities and Flood Mitigation Assistance obligations to population characteristics. Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities Direct Technical Assistance Communities FEMA Community Disaster Resilience Zones Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool Underserved Communities - census tracts National Risk Index - counties United States of America 2020 Census Population Characteristics. Description from: https://fema.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=be0e9beb017048439ff5406e76157be5 on July 1, 2025.

While the BRICS countries are grouped together in terms of economic development, demographic progress varies across these five countries. In 2019, India and South Africa were the only BRICS countries with a fertility rate above replacement level (2.1 births per woman). Fertility rates since 2000 show that fertility in China and Russia has either fluctuated or remained fairly steady, as these two countries are at a later stage of the demographic transition than the other three, while Brazil has reached this stage more recently. Fertility rates in India are following a similar trend to Brazil, while South Africa's rate is progressing at a much slower pace. Demographic development is inextricably linked with economic growth; for example, as fertility rates drop, female participation in the workforce increases, as does the average age, which then leads to higher productivity and a more profitable domestic market.

BackgroundSubarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a major global health concern associated with disproportionately high morbidity and mortality. The BRICS-plus nations (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, China, South Africa, and six other new members), account for a substantial proportion of the global population while being confronted with distinct public health challenges. This study aims to examine epidemiological trends and regional variations in SAH burden across BRICS-plus nations through comprehensive and timely analysis.MethodsData on the number, all-age rate, age-standardized rate, and relative change in SAH incidence from 1992 to 2021 across eleven BRICS-plus members were sourced from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) 2021. Associations between the incidence rate and the Socio-demographic Index (SDI) were assessed through Pearson correlation analyses. Furthermore, age-period-cohort modeling was utilized to quantify net drift, local drift, age, period, and cohort effects over the past three decades.ResultsExcept for China, SAH cases were observed to have significantly increased in the other ten BRICS members from 1992 to 2021. All BRICS-plus countries exhibited a declining trend in the age-standardized incidence rate over the study period. Indonesia reported the highest age-standardized incidence rate (10.94 per 100,000 population) in 2021, while China displayed the most significant decrease, at 59.36%. The annual net drift in the SAH incidence rate ranged from −3.36%% for China to −0.50% for the Russian Federation among the eleven countries. A significant negative correlation was observed between the incidence rate of SAH and SDI values. Nations displayed similar age-effect patterns characterized by initial declines followed by subsequent increases with advancing age, along with distinct period and cohort effects that may reflect variations in control measures and temporal burden patterns.ConclusionOur study demonstrates the overall decline in age standardized incidence rate of SAH, while highlighting the persistent health inequalities among eleven countries potentially attributable to socioeconomic disparities. Furthermore, the findings underscore the imperative for tailored interventions across age, period, and cohort dimensions to mitigate SAH-specific challenges in nations undergoing rapid development.

BackgroundThe increasing epidemiological trend of pediatric urolithiasis over the past three decades has brought it to the forefront of public health attention. An analysis of the disease burden in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) countries, which share common characteristics such as large population base and limited public health resources, will provide an important reference for global public health policy development. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the trend of the prevalence of pediatric urolithiasis in BRICS countries during 1990–2021, which in turn will provide more valuable information for them and the world in the prevention and treatment of pediatric urolithiasis.MethodsIn this study, data were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) database. The data were then statistically analyzed using the Joinpoint regression model, AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) prediction model, and subgroup analysis to assess trends in the prevalence of pediatric urolithiasis.ResultGlobally, the prevalence has been increasing every year, with the greatest increase in the 10–14 age group. Encouragingly, the Age-Standardized Prevalence Rate (ASPR) has shown a decreasing trend. The disease burden of pediatric urolithiasis is higher in India and Russia, with the prevalence in India and ASPR in Russia being the highest in the BRICS countries. In South Africa, there is a clear deficit in prevention and treatment in the 0–4 year age group. Additionally, although the burden of pediatric urolithiasis in Brazil is not currently severe, the trend is the fastest deteriorating among the BRICS countries. Finally, China has made significant progress in the prevention and control of pediatric urolithiasis over the past 30 years and is expected to continue this positive trend over the next 15 years.ConclusionThis in-depth analysis based on GBD 2021 provides a fresh perspective on the evolving burden of pediatric urolithiasis in BRICS countries over the last three decades. Our research provides valuable insights for policy makers and health care providers through in-depth analysis and scientific evaluation of the prevalence of pediatric urolithiasis using different statistical models. In addition, BRICS countries should develop targeted prevention strategies for at-risk populations and ensure the availability of effective treatments that are tailored to their national contexts while also reflecting global health trends and evidence.

According to Cognitive Market Research, the global BRIC Diagnostic Imaging Equipment market size is USD 5.1 billion in 2024 and will expand at a compound yearly growth rate (CAGR) of 4.3% from 2024 to 2031. Market Dynamics of BRIC Diagnostic Imaging Equipment Market

Key Drivers for BRIC Diagnostic Imaging Equipment Market

Increasing Prevalence of Chronic Diseases - The increasing incidence of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and diabetes in BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) countries significantly drives the demand for diagnostic imaging equipment. These conditions necessitate early and accurate diagnosis for effective treatment, leading to heightened utilization of imaging technologies like MRI, CT scans, and ultrasound. As the population ages and lifestyle-related health issues rise, the need for advanced diagnostic tools grows, prompting healthcare facilities to invest in state-of-the-art imaging equipment to enhance diagnostic capabilities and improve patient outcomes.
The expanding healthcare infrastructure is anticipated to drive the BRIC Diagnostic Imaging Equipment market's expansion in the years ahead.

Key Restraints for BRIC Diagnostic Imaging Equipment Market

The economic fluctuations impacting purchasing power and healthcare investments limit the BRIC Diagnostic Imaging Equipment industry growth.
The market also faces significant difficulties related to regulatory hurdles for market entry and product registration.

Introduction of the BRIC Diagnostic Imaging Equipment Market

The BRIC diagnostic imaging equipment market encompasses Brazil, Russia, India, and China, representing rapidly developing economies with burgeoning healthcare sectors. This market segment is integral to modern medical diagnostics, encompassing various imaging modalities such as X-ray, MRI, CT scans, ultrasound, and nuclear imaging. The demand for diagnostic imaging equipment in these countries is driven by factors like population growth, rising prevalence of the chronic diseases, surging healthcare expenditure, and infrastructure development in the healthcare sector. Despite significant growth prospects, challenges persist, including regulatory hurdles, limited access to advanced healthcare facilities in rural areas, and economic volatility affecting purchasing power. Moreover, competition among global and domestic manufacturers intensifies, compelling players to innovate technologically and offer cost-effective solutions tailored to the specific requirements of these emerging markets. Overall, the BRIC diagnostic imaging equipment market presents lucrative opportunities alongside unique challenges for stakeholders seeking to capitalize on the region's evolving healthcare landscape.

Abstract This article aims to analyze the recent scientific production about 4.0 Industry from BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa), published in leading academics journals. The 4.0 Industry incorporates nine technological innovations, which are related, directly and indirectly, to the evolution of Science and Technology (S&T) in BRICS, diagnosed by the evolution of the financial support, the participation in S&T in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), and the number of researchers and publications, in each member country. The descriptive and exploratory research was built using bibliometrics. The population was made up of texts of the databases Scopus and Web of Science, and the final sample was composed of 51 interdisciplinary articles. The analysis considered indicators of characterization of scientific production, to a certain degree co-occurrence of scientific productivity and scientific collaboration of methodological features of the study. It is concluded that Chinese articles are predominant, and the research indicated the increase of studies about Industry 4.0 in S&T in BRICS. There is still a need to effectively strengthen the cooperation of these countries in the aspects related to the subject, according to agreements already established in recent years. In addition, the academic production shows a vast field to be explored, with the need for cooperation and effective development of common S&T objectives in BRICS.

Russia has consistently had the highest crude death rate of any of the BRICS countries since 2000. However, this is not because Russia has the lowest living standards in the bloc, but rather the opposite. When compared with the other BRICS countries Russia has the highest level of human development with oldest population and the lowest birth rates; this results in very low population growth, and death rates per capita are much higher. Additionally, widespread alcohol and substance abuse, alongside unhealthy lifestyles, did increase Russia's death rate in the *****, particularly among men. South Africa South Africa, on the other hand, has the lowest level of demographic development, which is the reason it has the second highest death rate. In the early ***** especially, death rates rose due to the rapid spread of HIV/AIDS in the south of the continent, although living standards have improved significantly, and the death rate has dropped as a result.

For the other three countries, death rates have been much more consistent since 2000, due to their progression through the demographic transition.

The Russia ICT market, valued at $38.95 billion in 2025, is projected to experience robust growth, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 8.54% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is driven by several key factors. Firstly, increasing government initiatives promoting digitalization across various sectors, including BFSI, IT & Telecom, and government bodies themselves, are fueling demand for ICT solutions. Secondly, the burgeoning e-commerce sector and the growing adoption of cloud technologies are creating significant opportunities for hardware, software, and IT services providers. Finally, the rising penetration of smartphones and mobile internet access among the population is further bolstering market growth. However, geopolitical uncertainties and potential sanctions remain significant restraints, potentially impacting investment and technological advancements within the sector. The market is segmented by type (hardware, software, IT services, telecommunication services), enterprise size (SMEs, large enterprises), and industry vertical (BFSI, IT & Telecom, Government, Retail & E-commerce, Manufacturing, Energy & Utilities, Others). Large enterprises are currently the dominant segment due to their higher spending capacity on advanced ICT infrastructure. However, SMEs are also expected to contribute significantly to market growth over the forecast period due to increasing digital transformation initiatives. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of global and domestic players. Established multinational corporations like Kaspersky Lab, Huawei Technologies, and Orange SA compete alongside significant Russian players such as Rostelecom PJSC and MobileTeleSystem. The market is witnessing increasing competition, with companies focusing on innovation, strategic partnerships, and acquisitions to enhance their market share. Future growth will likely be influenced by the success of government digitalization strategies, the evolving regulatory environment, and the overall macroeconomic conditions within Russia. The continued investment in 5G infrastructure and the development of the digital economy are expected to be pivotal factors shaping the trajectory of the market in the coming years. Recent developments include: June 2024: VKontakte, a Russian social media company, revealed plans to construct a new data center in St. Petersburg. This expansion aims to enhance service performance and reliability for users and businesses, leveraging cloud technologies to manage computing power flexibly., February 2024: The Central Bank of Russia introduced the BRICS Bridge, a novel digital payment platform to provide an alternative to the US dollar. This initiative introduced an innovative digital platform for BRICS nations; it includes various financial recommendations and initiatives.. Key drivers for this market are: Growing E-Commerce and Digital Services, Government initiatives and Support. Potential restraints include: Growing E-Commerce and Digital Services, Government initiatives and Support. Notable trends are: Telecommunication Services are Driving the Russian ICT Market.