In the 2021-22 school year, about 27.7 percent of female students in the United States between the ages of 12 and 18 reported that they were bullied either online or by text. This is compared to 14.1 percent of male students who were cyberbullied in that year.

Introduction

Teacher Bullying Students Statistics: Bullying amongst peers and co-workers is a very commonly known fact. However, the topic that has the least attention is the bullying of students by teachers. The article further focuses on reviewing the statistics behind teachers bullying students. Teachers bullying students occur in school-related contexts globally in many different ways and to different extents. Even though the rate of teachers bullying students is almost 0.6%, it is necessary to shed more light on this challenge.

Many surveys have found that being exposed to teachers’ bullying can negatively affect a child’s psychological and physical health. Teacher bullying is an essential topic for future research.

In the third quarter of 2024, Facebook took action on 7.6 million pieces of bullying and harassment related content, down from 7.8 million in the previous quarter. Overall, the first quarter of 2022 saw the highest ever number of bullying and harassment related pieces of content removed by the platform. Between the first quarter of 2020 and the first quarter of 2021, the removal of bullying and harassment content increased significantly.

Decrease the number of high school youth (grades 9-12) who report they were bullied on school property from 18.6% in 2013 to 17.5% by 2020.

This table contains 870 series, with data for years 1994 - 1998 (not all combinations necessarily have data for all years), and was last released on 2007-01-29. This table contains data described by the following dimensions (Not all combinations are available): Geography (29 items: Austria; Belgium (Flemish speaking); Canada; Belgium (French speaking) ...), Sex (2 items: Males; Females ...), Age groups (3 items: 11 years; 15 years;13 years ...), Frequency (5 items: Not bullied others at school; Once or twice; About once a week; Sometimes ...).

Between August 2018 and June 2019, approximately 15.7 percent of high school students in the United States experienced cyber bullying during the last 12 months. American Indian or Alaskan Native students were most likely than any other group to be bullied online, with 21.3 percent of A//AN survey respondents stating that they had been bullied electronically in the 12 months before the survey. Black students reported the lowest online bullying rate. Cyber bullying includes being bullied through text messages, Instagram, Facebook, or other social media.

Data from the 10- to 15-year-olds’ Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) on the prevalence and nature of bullying.

These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they were received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompanying readme files for a brief dscription of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed. The qualitative data are not available as part of the data collection at this time. Numerous high-profile events involving student victimization on school buses have raised critical questions regarding the safety of school-based transportation for children, the efforts taken by school districts to protect students on buses, and the most effective transportation-based behavioral management strategies for reducing misconduct. To address these questions, a national web-based survey was administered to public school district-level transportation officials throughout the United States to assess the prevalence of misconduct on buses, identify strategies to address misconduct, and describe effective ways to reduce student misbehavior on buses. Telephone interviews were also conducted with a small group of transportation officials to understand the challenges of transportation-based behavioral management, to determine successful strategies to create safe and positive school bus environments, and to identify data-driven approaches for tracking and assessing disciplinary referrals. The collection includes 10 Stata data files: BVSBS_analysis file.dta (n=2,595; 1058 variables) Title Crosswalk File.dta (n=2,594; 3 variables) Lessons Learned and Open Dummies.dta (n=1,543; 200 variables) CCD dataset.dta (n=12,494; 89 variables) BVSB_REGION.dta (n=4; 3 variables) BVSB_SCHOOLS.dta (n=3; 3 variables) BVSB_STUDENTS.dta (n=3; 3 variables) BVSB_URBAN.dta (n=8; 3 variables) BVSB_WHITE.dta (n=3; 3 variables) FINALRAKER.dta (n=2,595; 2 variables)

During the 2018-2019 survey period, it was found that 10.6 percent of high school students in Georgia had been electronically bullied within the past 12 months. This includes being bullied through instant messaging, websites or texting. The U.S. average was 15.7 percent.

In 2018, 37 percent of Russian 15 year-old's reported being bullied at least a few times a month, the highest in Europe in this year. By comparison only 12 percent of Dutch 15-year-old's said they were bullied frequently, making the Netherlands the country with the lowest share of bullied students in this year.

Bullying reports the Total number of bullying incidents and the number of students with at least 1 bullying incident at the school district and state level.

Report on bullying, harassment and discrimination by school for July 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. There are two additional file attached which breaks down the statistics by administrative district and data dictionary.

The total number of bullying cases among students reported by schools in Japan peaked at around ******* in the academic year 2023. The number of acknowledged bullying cases in the country increased dramatically in 2012, followed by the enactment of the anti-bullying legislation to identify bullying at an early stage, which was implemented the year after.

This set of Excel files contains data on students reported as harassed or bullied or disciplined for harassment or bullying on the basis of sex, race, or disability category for all states. Each file contains three spreadsheets: total students, male students, and female students.

Financial overview and grant giving statistics of Anti - Bullying Certification Llc

This project examined the role of technology use in teen dating violence and abuse, and bullying. The goal of the project was to expand knowledge about the types of abuse experiences youth have, the extent of victimization and perpetration via technology and new media (e.g., social networking sites, texting on cellular phones), and how the experience of such cyber abuse within teen dating relationships or through bullying relates to other life factors. This project carried out a multi-state study of teen dating violence and abuse, and bullying, the main component of which included a survey of youth from ten schools in five school districts in New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania, gathering information from 5,647 youth about their experiences. The study employed a cross-sectional, survey research design, collecting data via a paper-pencil survey. The survey targeted all youth who attended school on a single day and achieved an 84 percent response rate.

The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of school-based anti-bullying programs in reducing school bullying. The following criteria were used for the inclusion of studies in the systematic review: the study described an evaluation of a program designed specifically to reduce school (kindergarten to high school) bullying; bullying was defined as including: physical, verbal, or psychological attack or intimidation that is intended to cause fear, distress, or harm to the victim; and an imbalance of power, with the more powerful child (or children) oppressing less powerful ones; bullying (specifically) was measured using self-report questionnaires, peer ratings, teacher ratings, or observational data; the effectiveness of the program was measured by comparing students who received it (the experimental condition) with a comparison group of students who did not receive it (the control condition). There must have been some control of extraneous variables in the evaluation by (1) randomization, or (2) pre-test measures of bulling, or (3) choosing some kind of comparable control condition; published and unpublished reports of research conducted in developed countries between 1983 and 2009 were included; and it was possible to measure the effect size. Several search strategies were used to identify 89 anti-bully studies meeting the criteria for inclusion in this review: researchers searched for the names of established researchers in the area of bullying prevention; researchers conducted a keyword search of 18 electronic databases; researchers conducted a manual search of 35 journals, either online or in print, from 1983 until the end of May 2009; and researchers sought information from key researchers on bullying and from international colleagues in the Campbell Collaboration. Studies included in the review were coded for the following key features: research design, sample size, publication date, location of the study, average age of the children, and the duration and intensity of the anti-bullying program for both the children and the teachers.

This study explored whether bullied students (ages 12 through 18, in grades 6 through 12, enrolled during the current school year, and not homeschooled) engage in specific protective behaviors that inhibit learning, put other students' safety at risk, or foster a negative school climate. It also explored whether bullied students' behaviors varied by the type of bullying (direct, verbal, indirect, or cyber) endured. The researchers conducted secondary analyses of the NATIONAL CRIME VICTIMIZATION SURVEY: SCHOOL CRIME SUPPLEMENT, 2009 (ICPSR 28201), using rare events logistic regression, a technique that enables examination of the effects of several independent variables on a dichotomous dependent variable. The dataset produced contains a total of 65 variables, including 18 variables describing direct, verbal, indirect, and cyber bullying behaviors, 4 variables describing response behaviors by those bullied, and 28 variables describing student and school characteristics.

The Wisconsin School Violence and Bullying Prevention Study sought to understand the impact of comprehensive bullying prevention programs on outcomes related to violence, safety, and bullying rates. This study focused on 24 middle schools (grades 6 to 8) in Wisconsin. To examine the effectiveness of the school's current anti-bullying program, the Bullying Prevention Program Assessment tool (BPPAT) was completed at the end of the school year. The BPPAT focused on administrative policy and procedures geared towards students, faculty, parents, or administrators. This tool examined the following items: policy and procedures, program implementation, staff training, parental education and communication, student training, reporting systems, and continuous quality improvement (CQI). Students and faculty were given surveys to determine bullying rates and perceptions of school safety. The school safety survey was given to all students concerning their bullying victimization and perception of school safety. This survey contains the following demographic variables: age, sex, grade, and race. The verified bullying incident data contains incident reporting from faculty, which focused on the type of bullying and the demographics of the perpetrator and victim. After new bullying prevention programs were implemented, students were given the safety and bullying victimization survey which focused on perceptions of bullying and school safety. The number of bullying incidents, number of student victims and perpetrators, and the demographic characteristics of victims and perpetrators were retained in aggregate form for each school were submitted to the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) for analysis.