100+ datasets found
  1. Business enterprise research and development, UK (designated as accredited...

    • ons.gov.uk
    • cy.ons.gov.uk
    xlsx
    Updated Dec 11, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Office for National Statistics (2024). Business enterprise research and development, UK (designated as accredited official statistics) [Dataset]. https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/governmentpublicsectorandtaxes/researchanddevelopmentexpenditure/datasets/ukbusinessenterpriseresearchanddevelopment
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 11, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Office for National Statisticshttp://www.ons.gov.uk/
    License

    Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    United Kingdom
    Description

    UK estimates of annual research and development (R&D) spending by UK businesses.

  2. UK Business Enterprise Research and Development survey (BERD)

    • data.wu.ac.at
    • data.europa.eu
    Updated Dec 12, 2013
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Office for National Statistics (2013). UK Business Enterprise Research and Development survey (BERD) [Dataset]. https://data.wu.ac.at/schema/data_gov_uk/NjVkZDEyZGMtNDYxZC00MDZmLWI0ZDktMzY2NTE0YjkyNTY3
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 12, 2013
    Dataset provided by
    Office for National Statisticshttp://www.ons.gov.uk/
    Area covered
    United Kingdom
    Description

    The survey collects research and development (R&D) data from UK business enterprises who have been identified as R&D performers. This includes expenditure data, types of research and numbers of scientists/researchers, technicians and support staff. It is the only survey that measures R&D expenditure and employment in the business sector in the UK. The data are used for policy purposes on Science and Technology, of which Research and Development (R&D) is an important part. Also used widely by academia.

  3. C

    China CN: Total Business Enterprise R&D Personnel: % of National Total

    • ceicdata.com
    Updated Dec 15, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CEICdata.com (2024). China CN: Total Business Enterprise R&D Personnel: % of National Total [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/china/number-of-researchers-and-personnel-on-research-and-development-non-oecd-member-annual/cn-total-business-enterprise-rd-personnel--of-national-total
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 15, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    CEICdata.com
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Dec 1, 2010 - Dec 1, 2021
    Area covered
    China
    Description

    China Total Business Enterprise R&D Personnel: % of National Total data was reported at 78.090 % in 2021. This records an increase from the previous number of 77.569 % for 2020. China Total Business Enterprise R&D Personnel: % of National Total data is updated yearly, averaging 65.747 % from Dec 1991 (Median) to 2021, with 31 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 78.166 % in 2018 and a record low of 30.723 % in 1991. China Total Business Enterprise R&D Personnel: % of National Total data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The data is categorized under Global Database’s China – Table CN.OECD.MSTI: Number of Researchers and Personnel on Research and Development: Non OECD Member: Annual.

    Notes to the September 2023 edition:
    In the March 2023 edition, the OECD suppressed and put on hold the publication of several R&D indicators for China because of concerns about the coherence of expenditure and personnel data. Chinese officials have since confirmed errors in the business R&D data submitted to OECD in February 2023 and revised figures subsequently. While the revised breakdowns between manufacturing and other sectors is now deemed coherent, few details are available about the structure of China's R&D in the service sector which has been significantly increasing in size. China provided additional explanations on the growth rates in the higher education and government sectors in 2019, as well as the discrepancies between personnel and expenditure trends in both sectors. Total estimates of GERD and its institutional sector components (BERD, HERD, GOVERD) for 2019 to 2021 have not been modified by China and have been published as reported to OECD. The OECD continues to encourage China and other non member economies to engage in comprehensive reporting of R&D statistics and metadata.
    ---Structural notes:The national breakdown by source of funds does not fully match with the classification defined in the Frascati Manual. The R&D financed by the government, business enterprises, and by the rest of the world can be retrieved but part of the expenditure has no specific source of financing, i.e. self-raised funding (in particular for independent research institutions), the funds from the higher education sector and left-over government grants from previous years.The government and higher education sectors cover all fields of NSE and SSH while the business enterprise sector only covers the fields of NSE. There are only few organisations in the private non-profit sector, hence no R&D survey has been carried out in this sector and the data are not available.From 2009, researcher data are collected according to the Frascati Manual definition of researcher.
    Beforehand, this was only the case for independent research institutions, while for the other sectors data were collected according to the UNESCO concept of 'scientist and engineer'.In 2009, the survey coverage in the business and the government sectors has been expanded.Before 2000, all of the personnel data and 95% of the expenditure data in the business enterprise sector are for large and medium-sized enterprises only. Since 2000 however, the survey covers almost all industries and all enterprises above a certain threshold. In 2000 and 2004, a census of all enterprises was held, while in the intermediate years data for small enterprises are estimated.Due to the reform of the S&T system some government institutions have become enterprises, and their R&D data have been reflected in the Business Enterprise sector since 2000.

  4. M

    Mexico MX: Business Enterprise Expenditure on R&D (BERD)

    • ceicdata.com
    Updated Jan 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mexico MX: Business Enterprise Expenditure on R&D (BERD) [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/mexico/business-enterprise-investment-on-research-and-development-oecd-member-annual/mx-business-enterprise-expenditure-on-rd-berd
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 15, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    CEICdata.com
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Dec 1, 2006 - Dec 1, 2017
    Area covered
    Mexico
    Description

    Mexico MX: Business Enterprise Expenditure on R&D (BERD) data was reported at 16,211.734 MXN mn in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 17,346.195 MXN mn for 2016. Mexico MX: Business Enterprise Expenditure on R&D (BERD) data is updated yearly, averaging 11,541.408 MXN mn from Dec 1989 (Median) to 2017, with 28 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 24,121.819 MXN mn in 2011 and a record low of 121.335 MXN mn in 1992. Mexico MX: Business Enterprise Expenditure on R&D (BERD) data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Mexico – Table MX.OECD.MSTI: Business Enterprise Investment on Research and Development: OECD Member: Annual.

    In Mexico, beginning with the 2004 data, the Business enterprise survey register was increased to include large firms not previously identified as R&D performers. The first R&D surveys based on the Frascati Manual covered the period 1992-93. Earlier data for R&D performed in the Government sector are based on national estimates and do not exactly correspond to the recommendations of the Frascati Manual.

  5. Business enterprise research and development, UK: 2021

    • gov.uk
    Updated Nov 17, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Office for National Statistics (2022). Business enterprise research and development, UK: 2021 [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/business-enterprise-research-and-development-uk-2021
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 17, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Office for National Statistics
    Area covered
    United Kingdom
    Description

    Official statistics are produced impartially and free from political influence.

  6. Nonprofit Research Activities Survey DataTable 2022

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Oct 11, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (2024). Nonprofit Research Activities Survey DataTable 2022 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/nonprofit-research-activities-survey-datatable-2022
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 11, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    National Center for Science and Engineering Statisticshttp://ncses.nsf.gov/
    Description

    The Nonprofit Research Activities (NPRA) module of the Annual Business Survey measures research and experimental development (R&D) performance and funding at U.S. 501(c) nonprofit organizations. The data is collected by the Census Bureau in partnership with the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics within the National Science Foundation. This dataset includes Business Enterprise Research and Development Survey assets for Calender Year 2022.

  7. P

    Poland PL: Total Business Enterprise R&D Personnel: Per Thousand Employment...

    • ceicdata.com
    Updated Jan 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CEICdata.com (2025). Poland PL: Total Business Enterprise R&D Personnel: Per Thousand Employment In Industry [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/poland/number-of-researchers-and-personnel-on-research-and-development-oecd-member-annual/pl-total-business-enterprise-rd-personnel-per-thousand-employment-in-industry
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 15, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    CEICdata.com
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Dec 1, 2010 - Dec 1, 2021
    Area covered
    Poland
    Description

    Poland PL: Total Business Enterprise R&D Personnel: Per Thousand Employment In Industry data was reported at 8.068 Per 1000 in 2021. This records an increase from the previous number of 7.452 Per 1000 for 2020. Poland PL: Total Business Enterprise R&D Personnel: Per Thousand Employment In Industry data is updated yearly, averaging 1.897 Per 1000 from Dec 1994 (Median) to 2021, with 28 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 8.068 Per 1000 in 2021 and a record low of 0.786 Per 1000 in 2002. Poland PL: Total Business Enterprise R&D Personnel: Per Thousand Employment In Industry data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Poland – Table PL.OECD.MSTI: Number of Researchers and Personnel on Research and Development: OECD Member: Annual. In Poland, in 2016, some units previously classified in the Government sector were reallocated to the Business sector. From 2013, improvements in R&D surveys enable the distribution of all expenditure by type of R&D, leading to a break in basic research series.From reference year 2019 onwards, GBARD for GUF is derived from the Higher Education R&D survey, in which units now report on subsidies received from the ministry responsible for science and higher education, whereas these estimates came directly from this ministry before 2019. GBARD data exclude European Commission funds since 2012.;

    Definition of MSTI variables 'Value Added of Industry' and 'Industrial Employment':

    R&D data are typically expressed as a percentage of GDP to allow cross-country comparisons. When compiling such indicators for the business enterprise sector, one may wish to exclude, from GDP measures, economic activities for which the Business R&D (BERD) is null or negligible by definition. By doing so, the adjusted denominator (GDP, or Value Added, excluding non-relevant industries) better correspond to the numerator (BERD) with which it is compared to.

    The MSTI variable 'Value added in industry' is used to this end:

    It is calculated as the total Gross Value Added (GVA) excluding 'real estate activities' (ISIC rev.4 68) where the 'imputed rent of owner-occupied dwellings', specific to the framework of the System of National Accounts, represents a significant share of total GVA and has no R&D counterpart. Moreover, the R&D performed by the community, social and personal services is mainly driven by R&D performers other than businesses.

    Consequently, the following service industries are also excluded: ISIC rev.4 84 to 88 and 97 to 98. GVA data are presented at basic prices except for the People's Republic of China, Japan and New Zealand (expressed at producers' prices).In the same way, some indicators on R&D personnel in the business sector are expressed as a percentage of industrial employment. The latter corresponds to total employment excluding ISIC rev.4 68, 84 to 88 and 97 to 98.

  8. P

    Portugal PT: Business Enterprise Expenditure on R&D (BERD)

    • ceicdata.com
    Updated Jun 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CEICdata.com (2023). Portugal PT: Business Enterprise Expenditure on R&D (BERD) [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/portugal/business-enterprise-investment-on-research-and-development-oecd-member-annual/pt-business-enterprise-expenditure-on-rd-berd
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    CEICdata.com
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Dec 1, 2011 - Dec 1, 2022
    Area covered
    Portugal
    Description

    Portugal PT: Business Enterprise Expenditure on R&D (BERD) data was reported at 2,566.389 EUR mn in 2022. This records an increase from the previous number of 2,153.562 EUR mn for 2021. Portugal PT: Business Enterprise Expenditure on R&D (BERD) data is updated yearly, averaging 334.174 EUR mn from Dec 1982 (Median) to 2022, with 41 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2,566.389 EUR mn in 2022 and a record low of 10.193 EUR mn in 1982. Portugal PT: Business Enterprise Expenditure on R&D (BERD) data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Portugal – Table PT.OECD.MSTI: Business Enterprise Investment on Research and Development: OECD Member: Annual.

    In Portugal, a significant number of entities previously classified in the PNP sector were re-classified to the higher education sector in 2013. Besides, R&D personnel occupation categories have been reviewed: researchers, technicians and other support staff have been defined according to the main functions performed by each individual as part of R&D activities and according to criteria based on the ISCO classification, rather than being defined only by the level of academic qualification. In 2008, the number of R&D personnel increased because of methodological improvements: the results of the individual survey forms were combined with information from other internal databases resulting notably in the inclusion of all permanent academic staff and all researchers funded by the Ministry of science, technology and higher education in 2008.

    Due to methodological improvements in the 2008 R&D survey as well as complementary information collected from internal databases, there is now a more complete and accurate measure of R&D resources - both expenditure and personnel - in the Higher education sector. In particular, the large increase in higher education funded R&D is due to the inclusion of more accurate data related to private higher education institutions.

    Beginning with the 2007 survey, the following measures resulted in a significant increase in Business enterprise R&D: the reintroduction of the fiscal incentive, SIFIDE; an increase in the number of the firms performing R&D activities; and an updating of the Business Enterprise register.

    New methodological procedures have been adopted for the 1997 survey so that only R&D activities are covered in the survey. The classification of BERD by NACE (Rev 1) was introduced and the data have been revised back to 1995. Some of the PNP units have been re-classified to the Business Enterprise and Higher Education sectors.

    In 1997, due to a new accounting method for structural funds from the European Commission, funds from the Rest of the World and direct Government financing are not comparable with those of earlier years.

    Before 2002, GBARD figures include EU funding programs. Thereafter, they are excluded, as set out in the 2015 Frascati Manual.

  9. Enterprise Survey 2013 - Romania

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • datacatalog.ihsn.org
    • +1more
    Updated Jun 17, 2014
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (2014). Enterprise Survey 2013 - Romania [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/2005
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 17, 2014
    Dataset provided by
    World Bankhttp://worldbank.org/
    European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
    Time period covered
    2012 - 2013
    Area covered
    Romania
    Description

    Abstract

    This research was conducted in Romania between December 2012 and October 2013, as part of the fifth round of the Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey (BEEPS V), a joint initiative of the World Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The objective of the study is to obtain feedback from enterprises in client countries on the state of the private sector. The research is also used to build a panel of enterprise data that will make it possible to track changes in the business environment over time, thus allowing, for example, impact assessments of reforms. Through face-to-face interviews with firms in the manufacturing and services sectors, the survey assesses the constraints to private sector growth and creates statistically significant business environment indicators that are comparable across countries.

    Data from 540 establishments was analyzed. Stratified random sampling was used to select the surveyed businesses.

    The survey topics include firm characteristics, information about sales and suppliers, competition, infrastructure services, judiciary and law enforcement collaboration, security, government policies, laws and regulations, financing, overall business environment, bribery, capacity utilization, performance and investment activities, and workforce composition.

    In 2011, the innovation module was added to the standard set of Enterprise Surveys questionnaires to examine in detail how introduction of new products and practices influence firms' performance and management.

    Geographic coverage

    National

    Analysis unit

    The primary sampling unit of the study is the establishment. An establishment is a physical location where business is carried out and where industrial operations take place or services are provided. A firm may be composed of one or more establishments. For example, a brewery may have several bottling plants and several establishments for distribution. For the purposes of this survey an establishment must make its own financial decisions and have its own financial statements separate from those of the firm. An establishment must also have its own management and control over its payroll.

    Universe

    The manufacturing and services sectors are the primary business sectors of interest. This corresponds to firms classified with International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) codes 15-37, 45, 50-52, 55, 60-64, and 72 (ISIC Rev.3.1). Formal (registered) companies with five or more employees are targeted for interview. Services firms include construction, retail, wholesale, hotels, restaurants, transport, storage, communications, and IT. Firms with 100% government/state ownership are not eligible to participate in Enterprise Surveys.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    The sample was selected using stratified random sampling technique. Three levels of stratification were used: industry, establishment size, and region.

    Industry was stratified into one manufacturing and two service sectors (retail, and other services).

    Size stratification was defined following the standardized definition for the roll-out: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (more than 99 employees). For stratification purposes, the number of employees was defined on the basis of reported permanent full-time workers. This seems to be an appropriate definition of the labor force since seasonal/casual/part-time employment is not a common practice, except in the sectors of construction and agriculture.

    Regional stratification was defined in 8 regions (city and the surrounding business area) throughout Romania.

    The sample frame used for the survey in Romania was from National Trade Register Office. The enumerated establishments were then used as the frame for the selection of a sample with the aim of obtaining interviews at 540 establishments with five or more employees.

    Given the impact that non-eligible units included in the sample universe may have on the results, adjustments may be needed when computing the appropriate weights for individual observations. The percentage of confirmed non-eligible units as a proportion of the total number of sampled establishments contacted for the survey was 8.5% (397 out of 4,663 establishments).

    In the dataset, the variables a2 (sampling region), a6a (sampling establishment's size), and a4a (sampling sector) contain the establishment's classification into the strata chosen for each country using information from the sample frame. Variable a4a coded using ISIC Rev 3.1 codes for the chosen industries for stratification. These codes include most manufacturing industries (15 to 37), retail (52), and (45, 50, 51, 55, 60-64, 72) for other services.

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    The structure of the data base reflects the fact that three different versions of the questionnaire were used. The basic questionnaire, the Core Module, includes all common questions asked to all establishments from all sectors. The second expanded variation, the Manufacturing Questionnaire, is built upon the Core Module and adds some specific questions relevant to manufacturing sectors. The third expanded variation, the Retail Questionnaire, is also built upon the Core Module and adds to the core specific questions relevant to retail firms. Each variation of the questionnaire is identified by the index variable, a0.

    Cleaning operations

    Data entry and quality controls are implemented by the contractor and data is delivered to the World Bank in batches (typically 10%, 50% and 100%). These data deliveries are checked for logical consistency, out of range values, skip patterns, and duplicate entries. Problems are flagged by the World Bank and corrected by the implementing contractor through data checks, callbacks, and revisiting establishments.

    Response rate

    Survey non-response must be differentiated from item non-response. The former refers to refusals to participate in the survey altogether, while the latter refers to the refusals to answer some specific questions. Enterprise Surveys suffer from both problems and different strategies were used to address these issues.

    Item non-response was addressed by two strategies: a- For sensitive questions that may generate negative reactions from the respondent, such as corruption or tax evasion, enumerators were instructed to collect the refusal to respond as a different option from don't know. b- Establishments with incomplete information were re-contacted in order to complete this information, whenever necessary.

    Survey non-response was addressed by maximizing efforts to contact establishments that were initially selected for interview. Attempts were made to contact the establishment for interview at different times/days of the week before a replacement establishment (with similar strata characteristics) was suggested for interview. Survey non-response did occur but substitutions were made in order to potentially achieve strata-specific goals.

    The number of realized interviews per contacted establishments was 0.12. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The number of rejections per contact was 0.56.

  10. Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey 2005 - Viet Nam

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • dev.ihsn.org
    • +2more
    Updated Oct 26, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (2023). Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey 2005 - Viet Nam [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/609
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 26, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    World Bankhttp://worldbank.org/
    European Bank for Reconstruction and Developmenthttp://ebrd.com/
    Time period covered
    2005
    Area covered
    Vietnam
    Description

    Abstract

    The World Bank Group and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development are implementing Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Surveys. Four rounds of the survey have been carried out so far (1999, 2002, 2005 and 2009). Furthermore, to set a benchmark for the transition countries, a survey of comparator countries was conducted in 2004-2005 covering Germany, Greece, Ireland, Portugal, South Korea, Spain and Vietnam. In Vietnam, 500 firms were surveyed.

    The objective of BEEPS is to obtain feedback from enterprises in client countries on the state of the private sector. Through face-to-face interviews with firms in the manufacturing and services sectors, the survey assesses the constraints to private sector growth and creates statistically significant business environment indicators that are comparable across countries.

    The survey topics include firm characteristics, information about sales and suppliers, infrastructure services, security, law enforcement, government policies, laws and regulations, financing, overall business environment, corruption, performance and investment activities, and workforce composition.

    Geographic coverage

    National

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    The BEEPS 2005 sample was drawn from the universe of firms in a broad range of economic activities. In each country, the sectoral composition of the sample in terms of manufacturing (including agro-processing) versus services (including commerce) was determined by their relative contribution to GDP.

    The sample included quotas related to size, ownership, export orientation, and geographical location to ensure sufficient numbers of firms to conduct analysis of firms with certain characteristics.

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    The current survey instruments are available: - Screener and Main Questionnaires.

    The survey topics include firm characteristics, information about sales and suppliers, infrastructure services, security, law enforcement, government policies, laws and regulations, financing, overall business environment, corruption, performance and investment activities, and workforce composition.

  11. Enterprise Survey 2013 - Jordan

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    • +1more
    Updated Jan 13, 2016
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    World Bank (2016). Enterprise Survey 2013 - Jordan [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/2065
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 13, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    European Bank for Reconstruction and Developmenthttp://ebrd.com/
    World Bankhttp://worldbank.org/
    European Investment Bank
    Time period covered
    2013 - 2014
    Area covered
    Jordan
    Description

    Abstract

    This survey was conducted in Jordan between May 2013 and January 2014. The survey was a joint initiative of the World Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and the European Investment Bank (EIB).

    The Enterprise Surveys, through interviews with firms in the manufacturing and services sectors, capture business perceptions on the biggest obstacles to enterprise growth, the relative importance of various constraints to increasing employment and productivity, and the effects of a country's business environment on its international competitiveness. They are used to create statistically significant business environment indicators that are comparable across countries. The Enterprise Surveys are also used to build a panel of enterprise data that will make it possible to track changes in the business environment over time and allow, for example, impact assessments of reforms.

    In Jordan, data from 573 establishments was analyzed. Stratified random sampling was used to select the surveyed businesses.

    The survey topics include firm characteristics, information about sales and suppliers, competition, infrastructure services, judiciary and law enforcement collaboration, security, government policies, laws and regulations, financing, overall business environment, bribery, capacity utilization, performance and investment activities, and workforce composition.

    Geographic coverage

    National

    Analysis unit

    The primary sampling unit of the study is the establishment. An establishment is a physical location where business is carried out and where industrial operations take place or services are provided. A firm may be composed of one or more establishments. For example, a brewery may have several bottling plants and several establishments for distribution. For the purposes of this survey an establishment must make its own financial decisions and have its own financial statements separate from those of the firm. An establishment must also have its own management and control over its payroll.

    Universe

    The whole population, or universe of the study, is the non-agricultural economy. It comprises: all manufacturing sectors according to the group classification of ISIC Revision 3.1: (group D), construction sector (group F), services sector (groups G and H), and transport, storage, and communications sector (group I). Note that this definition excludes the following sectors: financial intermediation (group J), real estate and renting activities (group K, except sub-sector 72, IT, which was added to the population under study), and all public or utilities-sectors.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    The sample for Jordan was selected using stratified random sampling. Three levels of stratification were used in this country: industry, establishment size, and region.

    The universe was stratified into three manufacturing industries (food manufacturing, garment manufacturing, and other manufacturing), and two service industries (retail, and other services).

    Size stratification was defined following the standardized definition for the rollout: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (more than 99 employees). For stratification purposes, the number of employees was defined on the basis of reported permanent full-time workers. This seems to be an appropriate definition of the labor force since seasonal/casual/part-time employment is not common practice, except in the sectors of construction and agriculture.

    Regional stratification was defined in five regions (city and the surrounding business area) throughout Jordan. The five regions were Amman, Irbid, Zarqa, Aqaba, and Balqa.

    The sample frame used for the survey in Jordan was from several sources: the World Bank SME survey in Jordan, the Amman Chamber of Industry, the Amman Chamber of Commerce, the Irbid Chamber of Industry, the Irbid Chamber of Commerce, the Zarqa Chamber of Industry, the Zarqa Chamber of Commerce, the Aqaba Chamber of Industry, the Aqaba Chamber of Commerce, the Balqa Chamber of Industry, the Balqa Chamber of Commerce, and the Orbis database (Bureau van Dijk for the validation of large-sized firms).

    The enumerated establishments were then used as the frame for the selection of a sample with the aim of obtaining interviews at 600 establishments with five or more employees.

    Given the impact that non-eligible units included in the sample universe may have on the results, adjustments may be needed when computing the appropriate weights for individual observations. The percentage of confirmed non-eligible units as a proportion of the total number of sampled establishments contacted for the survey was 8.7 % (182 out of 2,104 establishments).

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    The following survey instruments are available: - Manufacturing Questionnaire; - Services Questionnaire.

    Cleaning operations

    Data entry and quality controls are implemented by the contractor and data is delivered to the World Bank in batches (typically 10%, 50% and 100%). These data deliveries are checked for logical consistency, out of range values, skip patterns, and duplicate entries. Problems are flagged by the World Bank and corrected by the implementing contractor through data checks, callbacks, and revisiting establishments.

    Response rate

    Survey non-response must be differentiated from item non-response. The former refers to refusals to participate in the survey altogether, while the latter refers to the refusals to answer some specific questions. Enterprise Surveys suffer from both problems and different strategies were used to address these issues.

    Item non-response was addressed by two strategies: a- For sensitive questions that may generate negative reactions from the respondent, such as corruption or tax evasion, enumerators were instructed to collect the refusal to respond as a different option from don’t know. b- Establishments with incomplete information were re-contacted in order to complete this information, whenever necessary.

    Survey non-response was addressed by maximizing efforts to contact establishments that were initially selected for interview. Attempts were made to contact the establishment for interview at different times/days of the week before a replacement establishment (with similar strata characteristics) was suggested for interview. Survey non-response did occur but substitutions were made in order to potentially achieve strata-specific goals.

    The number of realized interviews per contacted establishment was 0.27. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The number of rejections per contact was 0.08.

  12. Enterprise Survey 2013 - Belarus

    • dev.ihsn.org
    • datacatalog.ihsn.org
    • +2more
    Updated Apr 25, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    World Bank (2019). Enterprise Survey 2013 - Belarus [Dataset]. https://dev.ihsn.org/nada/catalog/study/BLR_2013_ES_v01_M
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 25, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    World Bankhttp://worldbank.org/
    European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
    Time period covered
    2012 - 2013
    Area covered
    Belarus
    Description

    Abstract

    This research was conducted in Belarus between July 2012 and August 2013, as part of the fifth round of the Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey. The objective of the study is to obtain feedback from enterprises in client countries on the state of the private sector. The research is also used to build a panel of enterprise data that will make it possible to track changes in the business environment over time, thus allowing, for example, impact assessments of reforms. Through face-to-face interviews with firms in the manufacturing and services sectors, the survey assesses the constraints to private sector growth and creates statistically significant business environment indicators that are comparable across countries.

    In Russia, data from 360 establishments was analyzed. Stratified random sampling was used to select the surveyed businesses.

    The survey topics include firm characteristics, information about sales and suppliers, competition, infrastructure services, judiciary and law enforcement collaboration, security, government policies, laws and regulations, financing, overall business environment, bribery, capacity utilization, performance and investment activities, and workforce composition.

    In 2011, the innovation module was added to the standard set of Enterprise Surveys questionnaires to examine in detail how introduction of new products and practices influence firms' performance and management.

    Geographic coverage

    National

    Analysis unit

    The primary sampling unit of the study is the establishment. An establishment is a physical location where business is carried out and where industrial operations take place or services are provided. A firm may be composed of one or more establishments. For example, a brewery may have several bottling plants and several establishments for distribution. For the purposes of this survey an establishment must make its own financial decisions and have its own financial statements separate from those of the firm. An establishment must also have its own management and control over its payroll.

    Universe

    The manufacturing and services sectors are the primary business sectors of interest. This corresponds to firms classified with International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) codes 15-37, 45, 50-52, 55, 60-64, and 72 (ISIC Rev.3.1). Formal (registered) companies with five or more employees are targeted for interview. Services firms include construction, retail, wholesale, hotels, restaurants, transport, storage, communications, and IT. Firms with 100% government/state ownership are not eligible to participate in Enterprise Surveys.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    The sample for Belarus was selected using stratified random sampling technique. Three levels of stratification were used in Belarus: industry, establishment size, and region.

    Industry stratification was designed in the way that follows: the universe was stratified into one manufacturing industry, and two service industries (retail, and other services).

    Size stratification was defined following the standardized definition for the rollout: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (more than 99 employees). For stratification purposes, the number of employees was defined on the basis of reported permanent full-time workers. This seems to be an appropriate definition of the labor force since seasonal/casual/part-time employment is not a common practice, except in the sectors of construction and agriculture.

    Regional stratification was defined in seven regions (city and the surrounding business area) throughout Belarus.

    Given the stratified design, sample frames containing a complete and updated list of establishments for the selected regions were required. Great efforts were made to obtain the best source for these listings. However, the quality of the sample frames was not optimal and, therefore, some adjustments were needed to correct for the presence of ineligible units. These adjustments are reflected in the weights computation.

    IPSOS was hired to implement the Belarus 2013 enterprise survey. There were local subcontractors in each of the seven regions surveyed.

    The sample frame used for the survey in Belarus was from the Registr Belarus Redakt database.

    The enumerated establishments were then used as the frame for the selection of a sample with the aim of obtaining interviews at 360 establishments with five or more employees.

    The quality of the frame was assessed at the onset of the project through visits to a random subset of firms and local contractor knowledge. The sample frame was not immune from the typical problems found in establishment surveys: positive rates of non-eligibility, repetition, non-existent units, etc. Given the impact that non-eligible units included in the sample universe may have on the results, adjustments may be needed when computing the appropriate weights for individual observations. The percentage of confirmed non-eligible units as a proportion of the total number of sampled establishments contacted for the survey was 5.9% (48 out of 816 establishments).

    In the database there are two establishment identifiers - idstd and id. The first is a global unique identifier. The second is a country unique identifier. The variables a2 (sampling region), a6a (sampling establishment's size), and a4a (sampling sector) contain the establishment's classification into the strata chosen for each country using information from the sample frame. Variable a4a coded using ISIC Rev 3.1 codes for the chosen industries for stratification. These codes include most manufacturing industries (15 to 37), retail (52), and (45, 50, 51, 55, 60-64, 72) for other services.

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    The structure of the data base reflects the fact that 3 different versions of the questionnaire were used. The basic questionnaire, the Core Module, includes all common questions asked to all establishments from all sectors. The second expanded variation, the Manufacturing Questionnaire, is built upon the Core Module and adds some specific questions relevant to manufacturing sectors. The third expanded variation, the Retail Questionnaire, is also built upon the Core Module and adds to the core specific questions relevant to retail firms. Each variation of the questionnaire is identified by the index variable, a0.

    All variables are named using, first, the letter of each section and, second, the number of the variable within the section, i.e. a1 denotes section A, question 1. Variable names proceeded by a prefix "ECA" indicate questions specific to the Eastern Europe and Central Asia region, therefore, they may not be found in the implementation of the rollout in other countries. All other suffixed variables are global and are present in all country surveys over the world. All variables are numeric with the exception of those variables with an "x" at the end of their names. The suffix "x" denotes that the variable is alpha-numeric.

    The innovation module questionnaires were introduced in 2011. They cover such topics as product, process, marketing and organization innovations, research and development, acquisition of external knowledge and use of computers, protection of innovation, management practices, and interaction with the state and public-private partnerships.

    Cleaning operations

    Data entry and quality controls are implemented by the contractor and data is delivered to the World Bank in batches (typically 10%, 50% and 100%). These data deliveries are checked for logical consistency, out of range values, skip patterns, and duplicate entries. Problems are flagged by the World Bank and corrected by the implementing contractor through data checks, callbacks, and revisiting establishments.

    Response rate

    The number of realized interviews per contacted establishments was 0.44. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The number of rejections per contact was 0.46.

    Complete information regarding the sampling methodology, sample frame, weights, response rates, and implementation can be found in "Description of Belarus ES Implementation 2013" in Related Materials.

  13. Enterprise Survey 2013 - Kosovo

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    • +1more
    Updated Jun 18, 2014
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    World Bank (2014). Enterprise Survey 2013 - Kosovo [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/2008
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 18, 2014
    Dataset provided by
    World Bankhttp://worldbank.org/
    European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
    Time period covered
    2012 - 2013
    Area covered
    Kosovo
    Description

    Abstract

    This research was conducted in Kosovo between January 2013 and November 2013, as part of the fifth round of the Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey (BEEPS V), a joint initiative of the World Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The objective of the study is to obtain feedback from enterprises in client countries on the state of the private sector. The research is also used to build a panel of enterprise data that will make it possible to track changes in the business environment over time, thus allowing, for example, impact assessments of reforms. Through face-to-face interviews with firms in the manufacturing and services sectors, the survey assesses the constraints to private sector growth and creates statistically significant business environment indicators that are comparable across countries.

    Data from 202 establishments was analyzed. Stratified random sampling was used to select the surveyed businesses.

    The survey topics include firm characteristics, information about sales and suppliers, competition, infrastructure services, judiciary and law enforcement collaboration, security, government policies, laws and regulations, financing, overall business environment, bribery, capacity utilization, performance and investment activities, and workforce composition.

    In 2011, the innovation module was added to the standard set of Enterprise Surveys questionnaires to examine in detail how introduction of new products and practices influence firms' performance and management.

    Geographic coverage

    National

    Analysis unit

    The primary sampling unit of the study is an establishment. The establishment is a physical location where business is carried out and where industrial operations take place or services are provided. A firm may be composed of one or more establishments. For example, a brewery may have several bottling plants and several establishments for distribution. For the purposes of this survey an establishment must make its own financial decisions and have its own financial statements separate from those of the firm. An establishment must also have its own management and control over its payroll.

    Universe

    The manufacturing and services sectors are the primary business sectors of interest. This corresponds to firms classified with International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) codes 15-37, 45, 50-52, 55, 60-64, and 72 (ISIC Rev.3.1). Formal (registered) companies with five or more employees are targeted for interview. Services firms include construction, retail, wholesale, hotels, restaurants, transport, storage, communications, and IT. Firms with 100% government/state ownership are not eligible to participate in Enterprise Surveys.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    The sample was selected using stratified random sampling technique. Three levels of stratification were used: industry, establishment size, and region.

    Industry was stratified into one manufacturing and two service sectors (retail, and other services).

    Size stratification was defined following the standardized definition for the roll-out: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (more than 99 employees). For stratification purposes, the number of employees was defined on the basis of reported permanent full-time workers. This seems to be an appropriate definition of the labor force since seasonal/casual/part-time employment is not a common practice, except in the sectors of construction and agriculture.

    Regional stratification was defined in 7 regions (city and the surrounding business area) throughout Kosovo.

    The sample frame was from Kosovo Business Registraton Agency and Serbian Business Registers Agency. The enumerated establishments were then used as the frame for the selection of a sample with the aim of obtaining interviews at 200 establishments with five or more employees.

    Given the impact that non-eligible units included in the sample universe may have on the results, adjustments may be needed when computing the appropriate weights for individual observations. The percentage of confirmed non-eligible units as a proportion of the total number of sampled establishments contacted for the survey was 32.4% (212 out of 655 establishments).

    In the dataset, the variables a2 (sampling region), a6a (sampling establishment's size), and a4a (sampling sector) contain the establishment's classification into the strata chosen for each country using information from the sample frame. Variable a4a coded using ISIC Rev 3.1 codes for the chosen industries for stratification. These codes include most manufacturing industries (15 to 37), retail (52), and (45, 50, 51, 55, 60-64, 72) for other services.

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    The structure of the data base reflects the fact that three different versions of the questionnaire were used. The basic questionnaire, the Core Module, includes all common questions asked to all establishments from all sectors. The second expanded variation, the Manufacturing Questionnaire, is built upon the Core Module and adds some specific questions relevant to manufacturing sectors. The third expanded variation, the Retail Questionnaire, is also built upon the Core Module and adds to the core specific questions relevant to retail firms. Each variation of the questionnaire is identified by the index variable a0.

    Cleaning operations

    Data entry and quality controls are implemented by the contractor and data is delivered to the World Bank in batches (typically 10%, 50% and 100%). These data deliveries are checked for logical consistency, out of range values, skip patterns, and duplicate entries. Problems are flagged by the World Bank and corrected by the implementing contractor through data checks, callbacks, and revisiting establishments.

    Response rate

    Survey non-response must be differentiated from item non-response. The former refers to refusals to participate in the survey altogether, while the latter refers to the refusals to answer some specific questions. Enterprise Surveys suffer from both problems and different strategies were used to address these issues.

    Item non-response was addressed by two strategies: a- For sensitive questions that may generate negative reactions from the respondent, such as corruption or tax evasion, enumerators were instructed to collect the refusal to respond as a different option from "don't know". b- Establishments with incomplete information were re-contacted in order to complete this information, whenever necessary.

    Survey non-response was addressed by maximizing efforts to contact establishments that were initially selected for interview. Attempts were made to contact the establishment for interview at different times/days of the week before a replacement establishment (with similar strata characteristics) was suggested for interview. Survey non-response did occur but substitutions were made in order to potentially achieve strata-specific goals.

    The number of realized interviews per contacted establishments was 0.3. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The number of rejections per contact was 0.15.

  14. S

    Sweden SE: BERD Financed: Government

    • ceicdata.com
    Updated Jan 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CEICdata.com (2025). Sweden SE: BERD Financed: Government [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/sweden/business-enterprise-investment-on-research-and-development-oecd-member-annual/se-berd-financed-government
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 15, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    CEICdata.com
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Dec 1, 1997 - Dec 1, 2021
    Area covered
    Sweden
    Description

    Sweden SE: BERD Financed: Government data was reported at 3.547 % in 2021. This records a decrease from the previous number of 4.347 % for 2019. Sweden SE: BERD Financed: Government data is updated yearly, averaging 6.881 % from Dec 1981 (Median) to 2021, with 20 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 13.641 % in 1981 and a record low of 3.547 % in 2021. Sweden SE: BERD Financed: Government data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Sweden – Table SE.OECD.MSTI: Business Enterprise Investment on Research and Development: OECD Member: Annual.

    In Sweden, funds from the ALF agreement (agreement between central government and seven regions on physician education and clinical research) are reported as GOVERD expenditure from 2019, whereas they were previously reported as HERD. The organisation of the police force was changed in 2015 and this has altered the coverage of the R&D personnel figures (in the government sector) received through survey responses. Part of personnel data were reallocated from the category ”technicians” to the category “researchers” in 2013. In 2011 and 2009, the PNP sector decreased due to a new sampling method. In 2011, for personnel data, the institutional coverage of the Government sector was improved.

    Beginning 2007, researchers in the Business enterprise, Government and PNP sectors are now surveyed by occupation; prior to that year, data correspond to university graduates instead of researchers.

    Until 2005, R&D data for Sweden were underestimated: R&D in the Government sector covered central government units only and companies between 10-49 employees were excluded from the coverage. Moreover, prior to 1993 the surveys in the Business Enterprise, Government and Private Non-Profit sectors excluded R&D in the SSH. Also beginning 2005, FTE on R&D in the Higher education sector reflects a change in survey method. Concerning the Government sector, beginning 2005, the data exclude R&D personnel from the County councils, resulting in the personnel data being underestimated.

    From 1997, funding from the Public Research Foundations, previously classified in the PNP sector, is considered as funding from the government sector, due to their re-classification.

    In 1995, some institutions from the PNP sector were reclassified to the Business Enterprise or Government sectors; in the Higher Education sector, capital expenditures are excluded.

    Starting in 2023, a new method for compiling GBARD based entirely on administrative data and R&D survey coefficients has been implemented, resulting in a time series break and an estimated increase of total GBARD by approximately 1.46 billion SEK. From 1998, GBARD series refer to the calendar year (January-December) instead of the period July-June which had been used until 1994. Budget allocations for 1995 and 1996 are estimates based on the period July 1995-December 1996. Also from 1998, funding by Public Research Foundations is excluded from the GBARD data.

  15. Enterprise Survey 2018 - Greece

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • datacatalog.ihsn.org
    • +1more
    Updated Jan 2, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) (2020). Enterprise Survey 2018 - Greece [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/3572
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 2, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    World Bank Grouphttp://www.worldbank.org/
    World Bankhttp://worldbank.org/
    European Bank for Reconstruction and Developmenthttp://ebrd.com/
    European Investment Bank (EIB)
    Time period covered
    2018 - 2019
    Area covered
    Greece
    Description

    Abstract

    The survey was conducted in Greece between September 2018 and April 2019 by the World Bank Group (WBG). The objective of the Enterprise Survey is to gain an understanding of what firms experience in the private sector. As part of its strategic goal of building a climate for investment, job creation, and sustainable growth, the World Bank has promoted improving the business environment as a key strategy for development, which has led to a systematic effort in collecting enterprise data across countries. The Enterprise Surveys (ES) are an ongoing World Bank project in collecting both objective data based on firms' experiences and enterprises' perception of the environment in which they operate.

    Geographic coverage

    National coverage

    Analysis unit

    The primary sampling unit of the study is the establishment. An establishment is a physical location where business is carried out and where industrial operations take place or services are provided. A firm may be composed of one or more establishments. For example, a brewery may have several bottling plants and several establishments for distribution. For the purposes of this survey an establishment must make its own financial decisions and have its own financial statements separate from those of the firm. An establishment must also have its own management and control over its payroll.

    Universe

    Greece ES was based on the following size stratification: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (100 or more employees).

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    The sample for 2018 Greece ES was selected using stratified random sampling, following the methodology explained in the Sampling Note.

    Three levels of stratification were used in this country: industry, establishment size, and region.

    Industry stratification was designed in the way that follows: the universe was stratified into three manufacturing industries and two services industries- Food and Beverages (ISIC Rev. 3.1 code 15), Fabricated Metal Products (ISIC code 28), Other Manufacturing (ISIC codes 16-27, 29-37), Retail (ISIC code 52) and Other Services (ISIC codes 45, 50, 51, 55, 60-64, and 72).

    For the Greece ES, size stratification was defined as follows: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (100 or more employees).

    Regional stratification for the Greece ES was done across four regions: Northern Greece, Central Greece, Attica, and Aegean Islands, Crete.

    Note: Refer to Sampling Structure section in "The Greece 2018 Enterprise Surveys Data Set" document for further details on sampling.

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    The structure of the data base reflects the fact that 2 different versions of the survey instrument were used for all registered establishments. Questionnaires have common questions (core module) and respectfully additional manufacturing- and services-specific questions. The eligible manufacturing industries have been surveyed using the Manufacturing questionnaire (includes the core module, plus manufacturing specific questions). Retail firms have been interviewed using the Services questionnaire (includes the core module plus retail specific questions) and the residual eligible services have been covered using the Services questionnaire (includes the core module). Each variation of the questionnaire is identified by the index variable, a0.

    Response rate

    Survey non-response must be differentiated from item non-response. The former refers to refusals to participate in the survey altogether whereas the latter refers to the refusals to answer some specific questions. Enterprise Surveys suffer from both problems and different strategies were used to address these issues.

    Item non-response was addressed by two strategies: a- For sensitive questions that may generate negative reactions from the respondent, such as corruption or tax evasion, enumerators were instructed to collect the refusal to respond (-8) as a different option from don't know (-9).

    b- Establishments with incomplete information were re-contacted in order to complete this information, whenever necessary.

    The number of interviews per contacted establishments was 29.0%.

  16. Enterprise Survey 2012 - Russian Federation

    • dev.ihsn.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    • +2more
    Updated Apr 25, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (2019). Enterprise Survey 2012 - Russian Federation [Dataset]. https://dev.ihsn.org/nada/catalog/study/RUS_2012_ES_v01_M_WB
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 25, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    World Bankhttp://worldbank.org/
    European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
    Time period covered
    2011 - 2012
    Area covered
    Russia
    Description

    Abstract

    This research was conducted in Russian Federation between August 2011 and June 2012, as part of the fifth round of the Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey. The objective of the study is to obtain feedback from enterprises in client countries on the state of the private sector. The research is also used to build a panel of enterprise data that will make it possible to track changes in the business environment over time, thus allowing, for example, impact assessments of reforms. Through face-to-face interviews with firms in the manufacturing and services sectors, the survey assesses the constraints to private sector growth and creates statistically significant business environment indicators that are comparable across countries.

    In Russia, data from 4,220 establishments was analyzed. Stratified random sampling was used to select the surveyed businesses.

    The survey topics include firm characteristics, information about sales and suppliers, competition, infrastructure services, judiciary and law enforcement collaboration, security, government policies, laws and regulations, financing, overall business environment, bribery, capacity utilization, performance and investment activities, and workforce composition.

    In 2011, the innovation module was added to the standard set of Enterprise Surveys questionnaires to examine in detail how introduction of new products and practices influence firms' performance and management.

    Geographic coverage

    National

    Analysis unit

    The primary sampling unit of the study is the establishment. An establishment is a physical location where business is carried out and where industrial operations take place or services are provided. A firm may be composed of one or more establishments. For example, a brewery may have several bottling plants and several establishments for distribution. For the purposes of this survey an establishment must make its own financial decisions and have its own financial statements separate from those of the firm. An establishment must also have its own management and control over its payroll.

    Universe

    The manufacturing and services sectors are the primary business sectors of interest. This corresponds to firms classified with International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) codes 15-37, 45, 50-52, 55, 60-64, and 72 (ISIC Rev.3.1). Formal (registered) companies with five or more employees are targeted for interview. Services firms include construction, retail, wholesale, hotels, restaurants, transport, storage, communications, and IT. Firms with 100% government/state ownership are not eligible to participate in Enterprise Surveys.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    The sample for Russian Federation was selected using stratified random sampling technique. Three levels of stratification were used in Russia: industry, establishment size, and region.

    Industry stratification was designed in the way that follows: the universe was stratified into eight manufacturing industries (food, wood and furniture, chemicals and plastics and rubber, non-metallic mineral products, fabricated metal products, machinery and equipment, electronics and precision instruments, and other manufacturing), and seven service industries (construction, wholesale, retail, hotels and restaurants, supporting transport activities, IT, and other services).

    Size stratification was defined following the standardized definition for the rollout: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (more than 99 employees). For stratification purposes, the number of employees was defined on the basis of reported permanent full-time workers. This seems to be an appropriate definition of the labor force since seasonal/casual/part-time employment is not a common practice, except in the sectors of construction and agriculture.

    Regional stratification was defined in 37 regions (city and the surrounding business area) throughout Russia.

    Given the stratified design, sample frames containing a complete and updated list of establishments for the selected regions were required. Great efforts were made to obtain the best source for these listings. However, the quality of the sample frames was not optimal and, therefore, some adjustments were needed to correct for the presence of ineligible units. These adjustments are reflected in the weights computation.

    The Centre for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR) at New Economic School was hired to implement the Russia 2012 Enterprise Survey. There were local subcontractors in each of the 37 regions surveyed. The sample frame used for the survey in Russia was from the Ruslana database.

    The enumerated establishments were then used as the frame for the selection of a sample with the aim of obtaining interviews at 4,200 establishments with five or more employees.

    The quality of the frame was assessed at the onset of the project. The frame proved to be useful though it showed positive rates of non-eligibility, repetition, non-existent units, etc. These problems are typical of establishment surveys, but given the impact these inaccuracies may have on the results, adjustments were needed when computing the appropriate weights for individual observations. The percentage of confirmed non-eligible units as a proportion of the total number of sampled establishments contacted for the survey was 38.16% (9,191 out of 24,083 establishments).

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    The following survey instruments are available: - Core Questionnaire + Manufacturing Module [ISIC Rev.3.1: 15-37] - Core Questionnaire + Retail Module [ISIC Rev.3.1: 52] - Core Questionnaire [ISIC Rev.3.1: 45, 50, 51, 55, 60-64, 72] - Innovation Module - Retail and Core - Innovation Module - Manufacturing
    - Screener Questionnaire.

    The "Core Questionnaire" is the heart of the Enterprise Survey and contains the survey questions asked of all firms across the world. There are also two other survey instruments - the "Core Questionnaire + Manufacturing Module" and the "Core Questionnaire + Retail Module." The survey is fielded via three instruments in order to not ask questions that are irrelevant to specific types of firms, e.g. a question that relates to production and nonproduction workers should not be asked of a retail firm. In addition to questions that are asked across countries, all surveys are customized and contain country-specific questions. An example of customization would be including tourism-related questions that are asked in certain countries when tourism is an existing or potential sector of economic growth.

    The standard Enterprise Survey topics include firm characteristics, gender participation, access to finance, annual sales, costs of inputs/labor, workforce composition, bribery, licensing, infrastructure, trade, crime, competition, capacity utilization, land and permits, taxation, informality, business-government relations, innovation and technology, and performance measures. Over 90% of the questions objectively ascertain characteristics of a country's business environment. The remaining questions assess the survey respondents' opinions on what are the obstacles to firm growth and performance.

    The innovation module questionnaires were introduced in 2011. They cover such topics as product, process, marketing and organization innovations, research and development, acquisition of external knowledge and use of computers, protection of innovation, management practices, and interaction with the state and public-private partnerships.

    Cleaning operations

    Data entry and quality controls are implemented by the contractor and data is delivered to the World Bank in batches (typically 10%, 50% and 100%). These data deliveries are checked for logical consistency, out of range values, skip patterns, and duplicate entries. Problems are flagged by the World Bank and corrected by the implementing contractor through data checks, callbacks, and revisiting establishments.

    Response rate

    The number of realized interviews per contacted establishments was 0.56. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The number of rejections per contact was 0.56.

    Complete information regarding the sampling methodology, sample frame, weights, response rates, and implementation can be found in "Description of Russia ES Implementation 2012" in Technical Documents.

  17. Enterprise Survey 2009-2017, Panel Data - Liberia

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    • +1more
    Updated Jun 15, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    World Bank (2018). Enterprise Survey 2009-2017, Panel Data - Liberia [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/3027
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 15, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    World Bankhttp://worldbank.org/
    Liberia Institute for Statistics and Geo-Information Services
    Time period covered
    2009 - 2017
    Area covered
    Liberia
    Description

    Abstract

    The documented dataset covers Enterprise Survey (ES) panel data collected in Liberia in 2009 and 2017, as part of the Enterprise Survey initiative of the World Bank. An Indicator Survey is similar to an Enterprise Survey; it is implemented for smaller economies where the sampling strategies inherent in an Enterprise Survey are often not applicable due to the limited universe of firms.

    The objective of the 2009-2017 Enterprise Survey is to obtain feedback from enterprises in client countries on the state of the private sector as well as to build a panel of enterprise data that will make it possible to track changes in the business environment over time and allow, for example, impact assessments of reforms. Through interviews with firms in the manufacturing and services sectors, the Indicator Survey data provides information on the constraints to private sector growth and is used to create statistically significant business environment indicators that are comparable across countries.

    As part of its strategic goal of building a climate for investment, job creation, and sustainable growth, the World Bank has promoted improving the business environment as a key strategy for development, which has led to a systematic effort in collecting enterprise data across countries. The Enterprise Surveys (ES) are an ongoing World Bank project in collecting both objective data based on firms' experiences and enterprises' perception of the environment in which they operate.

    Geographic coverage

    National

    Analysis unit

    The primary sampling unit of the study is the establishment. An establishment is a physical location where business is carried out and where industrial operations take place or services are provided. A firm may be composed of one or more establishments. For example, a brewery may have several bottling plants and several establishments for distribution. For the purposes of this survey an establishment must make its own financial decisions and have its own financial statements separate from those of the firm. An establishment must also have its own management and control over its payroll.

    Universe

    The whole population, or the universe, covered in the Enterprise Surveys is the non-agricultural economy. It comprises: all manufacturing sectors according to the ISIC Revision 3.1 group classification (group D), construction sector (group F), services sector (groups G and H), and transport, storage, and communications sector (group I). Note that this population definition excludes the following sectors: financial intermediation (group J), real estate and renting activities (group K, except sub-sector 72, IT, which was added to the population under study), and all public or utilities sectors.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    The sample for the 2009-2017 Liberia Enterprise Survey (ES) was selected using stratified random sampling, following the methodology explained in the Sampling Note. Stratified random was preferred over simple random sampling for several reasons: - To obtain unbiased estimates for different subdivisions of the population with some known level of precision. - To obtain unbiased estimates for the whole population. The whole population, or universe of the study, is the non-agricultural economy. It comprises: all manufacturing sectors according to the group classification of ISIC Revision 3.1: (group D), construction sector (group F), services sector (groups G and H), and transport, storage, and communications sector (group I). Note that this definition excludes the following sectors: financial intermediation (group J), real estate and renting activities (group K, except subsector 72, IT, which was added to the population under study), and all public or utilities sectors.

    • To make sure that the final total sample includes establishments from all different sectors and that it is not concentrated in one or two of industries/sizes/regions.
    • To exploit the benefits of stratified sampling where population estimates, in most cases, will be more precise than using a simple random sampling method (i.e., lower standard errors, other things being equal.)
    • Stratification may produce a smaller bound on the error of estimation than would be produced by a simple random sample of the same size. This result is particularly true if measurements within strata are homogeneous.
    • The cost per observation in the survey may be reduced by stratification of the population elements into convenient groupings.

      Three levels of stratification were used in this country: industry, establishment size, and region. Industry stratification was designed as follows: the universe was stratified as into manufacturing and services industries. Manufacturing (ISIC Rev. 3.1 codes 15 - 37), and Services (ISIC codes 45, 50-52, 55, 60-64, and 72). For the Liberia ES, size stratification was defined as follows: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (100 or more employees).
      Regional stratification for the Liberia ES was done across three regions: Montserrado, Margibi, and Nimba.

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    The current survey instruments are available: - Services and Manufacturing Questionnaire - Screener Questionnaire.

    The standard Enterprise Survey topics include firm characteristics, gender participation, access to finance, annual sales, costs of inputs/labor, workforce composition, bribery, licensing, infrastructure, trade, crime, competition, capacity utilization, land and permits, taxation, informality, business-government relations, innovation and technology, and performance measures. Over 90% of the questions objectively ascertain characteristics of a country's business environment. The remaining questions assess the survey respondents' opinions on what are the obstacles to firm growth and performance.

    Cleaning operations

    Data entry and quality controls are implemented by the contractor and data is delivered to the World Bank in batches (typically 10%, 50% and 100%). These data deliveries are checked for logical consistency, out of range values, skip patterns, and duplicate entries. Problems are flagged by the World Bank and corrected by the implementing contractor through data checks, callbacks, and revisiting establishments.

    Response rate

    There was a high response rate especially as a result of positive attitude towards the international community in collaboration with the government in their reconstruction efforts after a period of civil strife.There was also very positive attitude towards World Bank initiatives.

  18. Enterprise Survey 2013 - Mongolia

    • datacatalog.ihsn.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    • +1more
    Updated Mar 29, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (2019). Enterprise Survey 2013 - Mongolia [Dataset]. https://datacatalog.ihsn.org/catalog/4748
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 29, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    World Bankhttp://worldbank.org/
    European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
    Time period covered
    2012 - 2013
    Area covered
    Mongolia
    Description

    Abstract

    This research was conducted in Mongolia between December 2012 and July 2013, as part of the fifth round of the Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey (BEEPS V), a joint initiative of the World Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The objective of the study is to obtain feedback from enterprises in client countries on the state of the private sector. The research is also used to build a panel of enterprise data that will make it possible to track changes in the business environment over time, thus allowing, for example, impact assessments of reforms. Through face-to-face interviews with firms in the manufacturing and services sectors, the survey assesses the constraints to private sector growth and creates statistically significant business environment indicators that are comparable across countries.

    Data from 360 establishments was analyzed. Stratified random sampling was used to select the surveyed businesses.

    The survey topics include firm characteristics, information about sales and suppliers, competition, infrastructure services, judiciary and law enforcement collaboration, security, government policies, laws and regulations, financing, overall business environment, bribery, capacity utilization, performance and investment activities, and workforce composition.

    In 2011, the innovation module was added to the standard set of Enterprise Surveys questionnaires to examine in detail how introduction of new products and practices influence firms' performance and management.

    Geographic coverage

    National

    Analysis unit

    The primary sampling unit of the study is the establishment. An establishment is a physical location where business is carried out and where industrial operations take place or services are provided. A firm may be composed of one or more establishments. For example, a brewery may have several bottling plants and several establishments for distribution. For the purposes of this survey an establishment must make its own financial decisions and have its own financial statements separate from those of the firm. An establishment must also have its own management and control over its payroll.

    Universe

    The manufacturing and services sectors are the primary business sectors of interest. This corresponds to firms classified with International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) codes 15-37, 45, 50-52, 55, 60-64, and 72 (ISIC Rev.3.1). Formal (registered) companies with five or more employees are targeted for interview. Services firms include construction, retail, wholesale, hotels, restaurants, transport, storage, communications, and IT. Firms with 100% government/state ownership are not eligible to participate in Enterprise Surveys.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    The sample was selected using stratified random sampling technique. Three levels of stratification were used: industry, establishment size, and region.

    Industry was stratified into one manufacturing and two service sectors (retail, and other services).

    Size stratification was defined following the standardized definition for the roll-out: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (more than 99 employees). For stratification purposes, the number of employees was defined on the basis of reported permanent full-time workers. This seems to be an appropriate definition of the labor force since seasonal/casual/part-time employment is not a common practice, except in the sectors of construction and agriculture.

    Regional stratification was defined in 5 regions (city and the surrounding business area) throughout Mongolia.

    The sample frame was from Business Registry, National Statistical Office (NSO) of Mongolia. The enumerated establishments were then used as the frame for the selection of a sample with the aim of obtaining interviews at 360 establishments with five or more employees.

    Given the impact that non-eligible units included in the sample universe may have on the results, adjustments may be needed when computing the appropriate weights for individual observations. The percentage of confirmed non-eligible units as a proportion of the total number of sampled establishments contacted for the survey was 10.2% (59 out of 577 establishments).

    In the dataset, the variables a2 (sampling region), a6a (sampling establishment's size), and a4a (sampling sector) contain the establishment's classification into the strata chosen for each country using information from the sample frame. Variable a4a coded using ISIC Rev 3.1 codes for the chosen industries for stratification. These codes include most manufacturing industries (15 to 37), retail (52), and (45, 50, 51, 55, 60-64, 72) for other services.

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    The structure of the data base reflects the fact that three different versions of the questionnaire were used. The basic questionnaire, the Core Module, includes all common questions asked to all establishments from all sectors. The second expanded variation, the Manufacturing Questionnaire, is built upon the Core Module and adds some specific questions relevant to manufacturing sectors. The third expanded variation, the Retail Questionnaire, is also built upon the Core Module and adds to the core specific questions relevant to retail firms. Each variation of the questionnaire is identified by the index variable a0.

    Cleaning operations

    Data entry and quality controls are implemented by the contractor and data is delivered to the World Bank in batches (typically 10%, 50% and 100%). These data deliveries are checked for logical consistency, out of range values, skip patterns, and duplicate entries. Problems are flagged by the World Bank and corrected by the implementing contractor through data checks, callbacks, and revisiting establishments.

    Response rate

    Survey non-response must be differentiated from item non-response. The former refers to refusals to participate in the survey altogether, while the latter refers to the refusals to answer some specific questions. Enterprise Surveys suffer from both problems and different strategies were used to address these issues.

    Item non-response was addressed by two strategies: a- For sensitive questions that may generate negative reactions from the respondent, such as corruption or tax evasion, enumerators were instructed to collect the refusal to respond as a different option from don't know. b- Establishments with incomplete information were re-contacted in order to complete this information, whenever necessary.

    Survey non-response was addressed by maximizing efforts to contact establishments that were initially selected for interview. Attempts were made to contact the establishment for interview at different times/days of the week before a replacement establishment (with similar strata characteristics) was suggested for interview. Survey non-response did occur but substitutions were made in order to potentially achieve strata-specific goals.

    The number of realized interviews per contacted establishments was 0.62. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The number of rejections per contact was 0.13.

  19. T

    Taiwan R&D: Source of Fund: Business Enterprise

    • ceicdata.com
    Updated May 15, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Taiwan R&D: Source of Fund: Business Enterprise [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/taiwan/national-science-and-technology-survey-research-and-development-source-of-fund/rd-source-of-fund-business-enterprise
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 15, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    CEICdata.com
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Dec 1, 2005 - Dec 1, 2016
    Area covered
    Taiwan
    Variables measured
    Enterprises Survey
    Description

    Taiwan R&D: Source of Fund: Business Enterprise data was reported at 455,675.000 NTD mn in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 420,872.000 NTD mn for 2016. Taiwan R&D: Source of Fund: Business Enterprise data is updated yearly, averaging 247,913.000 NTD mn from Dec 1999 (Median) to 2017, with 19 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 455,675.000 NTD mn in 2017 and a record low of 125,712.000 NTD mn in 1999. Taiwan R&D: Source of Fund: Business Enterprise data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Ministry of Science and Technology. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Taiwan – Table TW.S010: National Science and Technology Survey: Research and Development: Source of Fund.

  20. G

    Germany DE: Total Business Enterprise R&D Personnel: % of National Total

    • ceicdata.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CEICdata.com, Germany DE: Total Business Enterprise R&D Personnel: % of National Total [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/germany/number-of-researchers-and-personnel-on-research-and-development-oecd-member-annual/de-total-business-enterprise-rd-personnel--of-national-total
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    CEICdata.com
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Dec 1, 2010 - Dec 1, 2021
    Area covered
    Germany
    Description

    Germany DE: Total Business Enterprise R&D Personnel: % of National Total data was reported at 63.417 % in 2021. This records a decrease from the previous number of 63.699 % for 2020. Germany DE: Total Business Enterprise R&D Personnel: % of National Total data is updated yearly, averaging 63.417 % from Dec 1981 (Median) to 2021, with 35 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 70.450 % in 1987 and a record low of 61.011 % in 1996. Germany DE: Total Business Enterprise R&D Personnel: % of National Total data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Germany – Table DE.OECD.MSTI: Number of Researchers and Personnel on Research and Development: OECD Member: Annual. The data in this publication for Germany cover unified Germany from 1991 and western Germany only until 1990.In 2016, the method for calculating R&D coefficients was revised, introducing a break in series in the Higher Education sector. In particular, coefficients are thereafter based on time-use surveys.From reference year 2014, the distribution of R&D personnel by occupation is requested in the government survey whereas it was previously estimated from data by qualification.The method for calculating public-financed R&D in the business enterprise sector was reviewed, resulting in the revision of business enterprise R&D and the national total back to 1991.In 1992 the methodology of the survey on resources devoted to R&D in the Government sector was changed. From 1991, the data for the Private Non-Profit sector have been included in the Government sector.For 1997, the methodology for allocating GBARD by socio-economic objective changed. For 1997 and from 2001 to 2015, the global budget reduction was not distributed proportionally across SEO by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Therefore, the sum of the breakdown for those years does not add to the total. From 2016 onwards the global reduction is distributed across SEO proportionally.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Office for National Statistics (2024). Business enterprise research and development, UK (designated as accredited official statistics) [Dataset]. https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/governmentpublicsectorandtaxes/researchanddevelopmentexpenditure/datasets/ukbusinessenterpriseresearchanddevelopment
Organization logo

Business enterprise research and development, UK (designated as accredited official statistics)

Explore at:
xlsxAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Dec 11, 2024
Dataset provided by
Office for National Statisticshttp://www.ons.gov.uk/
License

Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically

Area covered
United Kingdom
Description

UK estimates of annual research and development (R&D) spending by UK businesses.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu