Website analytics for www.cambridgeshire.net between 2009 and 2013

Statistics from the www.cambridgeshire.net website

🇬🇧 영국

Cambridgeshire.net data comprises local listings and contact details for Groups, Clubs and Organisations (4,500 currently published), Courses (2,300 currently published) and Events and Activities (3,400 currently published)

🇬🇧 영국

A mini directory of local services (68 in total in and around Cambridge) to be used to develop our geo-location project.

This project was replaced in Autumn 2019 by the purchase of a new website called Street Support Cambridge, which provides more detailed listings of accommodation and services, with locations, access details and opening times, across Cambridge for people who are homeless.

It also enables local residents, businesses and communities to offer time, money and goods to support homeless people locally.

Street Support was purchased by It Takes A City, and is available at https://streetsupport.net/cambridge

In 2020 the other five districts bought into the Street Support system, which now covers Cambridgeshire and is known as Street Support Cambridgeshire, located at https://streetsupport.net/cambridgeshire.

We are retaining the original "proof of concept" data on Cambridgeshire Insight Open Data to demonstrate how an exploratory data project has led to a much wider, community-based project with real-life application for residents of Cambridge, and for those finding themselves living on the street of Cambridge. The data was used to start populating Street Support Cambridge. The original service details were secured through cooperation with the Cambridge City Foodbank, the area's Financial Capability Forum, and through web searches.

The directory is not exhaustive but aims to set out some examples of data we can use and share locally, and to set out the idea of developing further directories in future for a variety of partners and uses.

Data for Figure 5.33 from Chapter 5 of the Working Group I (WGI) Contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report (AR6).

Figure 5.33 shows carbon sink response in a scenario with net carbon dioxide (CO2) removal from the atmosphere.

How to cite this dataset

When citing this dataset, please include both the data citation below (under 'Citable as') and the following citation for the report component from which the figure originates: Canadell, J.G., P.M.S. Monteiro, M.H. Costa, L. Cotrim da Cunha, P.M. Cox, A.V. Eliseev, S. Henson, M. Ishii, S. Jaccard, C. Koven, A. Lohila, P.K. Patra, S. Piao, J. Rogelj, S. Syampungani, S. Zaehle, and K. Zickfeld, 2021: Global Carbon and other Biogeochemical Cycles and Feedbacks. In Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp. 673–816, doi:10.1017/9781009157896.007.

List of data provided

This dataset contains data for 50-year periods during 2000-2300 for:

• Atmospheric CO2 concentration
• Net CO2 emissions (accumulated over 50 year periods)
• Net land flux (accumulated over 50 year periods)
• Net ocean flux (accumulated over 50 year periods)

Data provided in relation to figure

Data file: Data_Figure_5_33.csv:

• row 1: x-axis values.
• row 2: light blue bars.
• row 3: orange bars.
• row 4: green bars.
• row 5: blue bars
• row 6: relates with the values written in black over the corresponding arrows (row 2 values plus values written in black)
• row 7: Standard deviation over orange bars.
• row 8: Standard deviation over green bars.

• row 9: Standard deviation over blue bars.

  Notes on reproducing the figure from the provided data

  This figure was created in Excel and the error bars (standard deviation) were added in Adobe Illustrator.

Sources of additional information

The following weblinks are provided in the Related Documents section of this catalogue record: - Link to the figure on the IPCC AR6 website - Link to the report component containing the figure (Chapter 5) - Link to the Supplementary Material for Chapter 5, which contains details on the input data used in Table 5.SM.6

Abstract. 1. Understanding which factors influence the ability of individuals to respond to changing temperatures is fundamental to species conservation under climate change. 2. We investigated how a community of butterflies responded to fine-scale changes in air temperature, and whether species-specific responses were predicted by ecological or morphological traits. 3. Using data collected across a UK reserve network, we investigated the ability of 29 butterfly species to buffer thoracic temperature against changes in air temperature. First, we tested whether differences were attributable to taxonomic family, morphology or habitat association. We then investigated the relative importance of two buffering mechanisms: behavioural thermoregulation versus fine-scale microclimate selection. Finally, we tested whether species’ responses to changing temperatures predicted their population trends from a UK-wide dataset. 4. We found significant interspecific variation in buffering ability, which varied between families and increased with wing length. We also found interspecific differences in the relative importance of the two buffering mechanisms, with species relying on microclimate selection suffering larger population declines over the last 40 years than those that could alter their temperature behaviourally. 5. Our results highlight the importance of understanding how different species respond to fine-scale temperature variation, and the value of taking microclimate into account in conservation management to ensure favourable conditions are maintained for temperature-sensitive species. \( \ \) Methods. Data were collected in the UK, on four calcareous grassland reserves in Bedfordshire owned and managed by The Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire & Northamptonshire (Totternhoe Quarry [-0.56836, 51.89199], Totternhoe Knolls [-0.58039, 51.88989], Pegsdon Hills [-0.37020, 51.95354] and Blows Downs [-0.49580, 51.88321]); at two sites in Cumbria (Irton Fell [-3.34000, 54.40672] and Haweswater [-2.84598, 54.50756]); at one site in Scotland owned and managed by the National Trust for Scotland (Ben Lawers [-4.27326, 56.53287]); and at a calcareous grassland reserve in Wiltshire owned and managed by the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (Winterbourne Downs [-1.68500, 51.14963]).

Between April and September 2009 in Bedfordshire, and between May and September 2018 at all sites, adult butterflies were surveyed at each site. After recording the behaviour of each butterfly when first encountered, we caught as many individuals as possible using a butterfly net. We did not chase individuals, to ensure that the temperature recorded reflected the activity of the butterfly prior to capture. Immediately after capture, we used a fine (0.25 mm) mineral-insulated type K thermocouple and hand-held indicator (Tecpel Thermometer 305B) to record external thoracic temperatures (Tbody). Only three individual devices were used for data collection, and were calibrated to the same readings prior to use. The thermocouple was pressed gently onto an exposed area of each butterfly’s thorax, while the butterfly was held securely in the net, away from the hands of the recorder to avoid artificially elevating the recording or causing any damage to the butterfly. Butterflies were then released. A second temperature recording was then taken at the same location in free air, in the shade, at waist height (Tair). In 2018, for butterflies perching on vegetation at the time of capture, a third temperature reading was taken by holding the thermocouple a centimetre above the perch location (Tperch).

Information on habitat specialisation was added from Asher et al. (2001), mean wingspan was taken from Eeles (2020), and colour category was determined by assigning each species a score from 1 (white) to 6 (black) on the basis of how pale/dark wing colours appeared by eye (see Bladon et al. 2020 for details). \( \ \) References.

Asher J, Warren MS, Fox R, Harding P, Jeffcoate G & Jeffcoate S (2001) The Millennium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bladon AJ, Lewis M, Bladon EK, Buckton S, Corbett S, Ewing SR, Hayes MP, Hitchcock GE, Knock RI, Lucas CBH, McVeigh A, Menéndez R, Walker J, Fayle T & Turner EC (2020) How butterflies keep their cool: physical and ecological traits influence thermoregulatory ability and population trends. Journal of Animal Ecology.

Eeles P (2020) UK Butterflies. Retrieved from UK Butterflies website: https://ukbutterflies.co.uk/index.php