Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Mexico Population: Male: Campeche data was reported at 473.756 Person th in 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 465.318 Person th for 2017. Mexico Population: Male: Campeche data is updated yearly, averaging 311.220 Person th from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2018, with 49 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 473.756 Person th in 2018 and a record low of 132.150 Person th in 1970. Mexico Population: Male: Campeche data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Population Council. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Mexico – Table MX.G002: Population: by State.
Facebook
TwitterAs of 2020, the Mexican state of Campeche accommodated a population of approximately ******* inhabitants. The gender distribution among the residents was relatively equal, with women comprising ****% and men making up ****% of the total population.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Mexico Average Years in School: Population: 15 Years & Above: Campeche data was reported at 9.630 Year in 2020. This records an increase from the previous number of 9.140 Year for 2015. Mexico Average Years in School: Population: 15 Years & Above: Campeche data is updated yearly, averaging 8.825 Year from Dec 2000 (Median) to 2020, with 4 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 9.630 Year in 2020 and a record low of 7.010 Year in 2000. Mexico Average Years in School: Population: 15 Years & Above: Campeche data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Institute of Statistics and Geography. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Mexico – Table MX.G016: Education Statistics: Age 15 and Above.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
人口:男性:坎佩切在12-01-2018达473.756千人,相较于12-01-2017的465.318千人有所增长。人口:男性:坎佩切数据按年更新,12-01-1970至12-01-2018期间平均值为311.220千人,共49份观测结果。该数据的历史最高值出现于12-01-2018,达473.756千人,而历史最低值则出现于12-01-1970,为132.150千人。CEIC提供的人口:男性:坎佩切数据处于定期更新的状态,数据来源于Consejo Nacional de Poblacion,数据归类于全球数据库的墨西哥 – 表 MX.G002:人口:按州划分。
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Mexico Life Expectancy at Birth: Campeche data was reported at 74.610 Year in 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 74.505 Year for 2017. Mexico Life Expectancy at Birth: Campeche data is updated yearly, averaging 71.870 Year from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2018, with 49 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 75.280 Year in 2006 and a record low of 60.200 Year in 1970. Mexico Life Expectancy at Birth: Campeche data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Population Council. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Mexico – Table MX.G006: Life Expectancy at Birth: by State.
Facebook
TwitterResolving natal populations for juvenile green turtles is challenging given their potential for extensive dispersal during the oceanic stage and ontogenetic shifts among nursery habitats. Mitochondrial DNA markers have elucidated patterns of connectivity between green turtle nesting populations (rookeries) and juvenile foraging aggregations. However, missing rookery baseline data and haplotype sharing among populations have often impeded inferences, including estimating origins of Gulf of Mexico juveniles. Here, we assessed genetic structure among seven foraging aggregations spanning southern Texas (TX) to southwestern Florida (SWFL), including Port Fourchon, Louisiana (LA); a surface-pelagic aggregation (SP) offshore of Louisiana and Florida; Santa Rosa Island, Florida (SRI); St. Joseph Bay, Florida (SJB); and the Big Bend region, Florida (BB). We estimated source contributions to aggregations with novel genetic data (excluding SP and BB) using a Bayesian many-to-one mixed stock analysis (MSA) approach. Haplotype frequencies for western (TX, LA, SP, SRI) and eastern (SJB, BB, SWFL) aggregations were significantly differentiated. The largest shift in haplotype frequencies between proximal nursery sites occurred between SRI and SJB, separated by only 150 km, highlighting the lack of a geographic yardstick for predicting genetic structure. In contrast to previous MSA results, there was no signal of Florida juveniles at any foraging site. Mexican contributions dominated in all aggregations, with strong connectivity between western Bay of Campeche (Tamaulipas/Veracruz) rookeries and western foraging aggregations. MSA indicated more diverse Mexican origins for eastern aggregations, with larger inputs from the eastern Bay of Campeche (Campeche/Yucatán), Campeche Bank, and Quintana Roo rookeries. These results demonstrate the significance of the Gulf of Mexico coast and offshore waters of the United States as important nursery habitat for green turtles of Mexican origin and highlight the need for international coordination for management of these populations.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html
Patterns of genetic variation reflect interactions among microevolutionary forces that vary in strength with changing demography. For marine species, these patterns are often interpreted under the expectation that larval movement drives connectivity because most marine species exhibit broadcast spawning dispersal strategies. Here, patterns of variation within and among samples of the mouth brooding gafftopsail catfish (Bagre marinus, Family Ariidae) captured in the U.S Atlantic and throughout the Gulf of Mexico were analyzed using genomics to generate neutral and non-neutral SNP data sets. Because genomic resources are lacking for ariids, linkage disequilibrium network analysis was used to examine patterns of putatively adaptive variation. Finally, historical demographic parameters were estimated from site frequency spectra. The results show four differentiated groups, corresponding to the (1) U.S. Atlantic, and the (2) northeastern, (3) northwestern, and (4) southern Gulf of Mexico. Patterns of genetic variation for the neutral data resemble that of other fishes that use the same estuarine habitats as nurseries, regardless of the presence/absence of a dispersive larval phase, supporting the idea that adult/juvenile behavior and habitat are important predictors of contemporary patterns of genetic structure. The non-neutral data presented two contrasting signals of structure, one due to increases in diversity moving west to east and north to south, and another to increased heterozygosity in the Atlantic. Demographic analysis suggested recently reduced long-term effective population size in the Atlantic is likely an important driver of patterns of genetic variation and is consistent with a known reduction in population size potentially due to an epizootic. Methods Sampling and library prep Fin clips were obtained from 382 mixed-age samples of gafftopsail catfish collected from nine geographic sampling locations (hereafter locations; Figure 1) from 2015 to 2018: one in the Atlantic in Indian River Lagoon, Florida and adjacent coastal waters (ATL) and eight in the Gulf. Locations in the Gulf were near Tampa Bay, Florida (FLGS), North of Tampa Bay, Florida (FLGN), near Mobile Bay, Alabama, (MB), in Mississippi Sound, Mississippi (MISS), in Chandeleur Sound, LA (CS), off Louisiana west of the Mississippi River (LA), in Corpus Christi Bay, Texas (CC) and in the Bay of Campeche, Mexico (CAMP). All locations were selected because they represent inshore habitats used by mouth brooding males for parturition and by juveniles as nursery habitat, except CAMP which was opportunistically sampled further offshore. Sampling took place as part of surveys routinely conducted by state or academic entities, the latter following approved animal care protocols. All fin clips were preserved in 20% DMSO-0.25M EDTA-saturated NaCl buffer (Seutin et al., 1991) and stored at room temperature until time of extraction. DNA was extracted using Mag-Bind Tissue DNA kits (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA) and 500-1000 ng of high-quality genomic DNA used in a modified version of the ddRAD genomic library preparation method (Peterson et al., 2012). Briefly, genomic DNA was digested with two restriction endonucleases (EcoRI, MspI), and a barcoded adapter was ligated to EcoRI sites while a common adapter was ligated to MspI sites. Following adapter ligation, individuals were pooled by index and size-selected using a Pippin Prep size-selection system (Sage Science, Beverly, MA) to a standard size range (338 – 412 base pairs). Polymerase chain-reaction (PCR) amplification of fragments was performed to incorporate adaptors necessary for annealing to an Illumina flow cell and index-specific identifiers. Index pools were then combined into libraries of approximately 150 individuals spread across the geographic range of sampling and duplicate individuals (technical replicates), and three libraries were sequenced (paired-end) each on a lane of an Illumina HiSeq 4000 DNA sequencer at GeneWiz®, New Jersey, USA. Genotyping RAD sequences retrieved from each run were demultiplexed using process_radtags (Catchen et al., 2011) and quality trimming, reduced-representation reference assembly, read mapping and SNP calling were performed using the dDocent pipeline (Puritz et al., 2014). The ten individuals with the highest number of reads were selected from each lane for de novo reduced-representation reference assembly, using the overlapping read (OL) assembly option in dDocent. Similarity threshold for clustering (c = 0.8), minimum within individual coverage (K1 = 5) and minimum number of individuals a read must occur in to be included (K2 = 2) were chosen after comparing mapping statistics for ten individuals randomly chosen from each library and mapped to references generated for c = 0.8, K1 = 2 – 10, and K2 = 1 – 10 using BWA (Li & Durbin, 2009) to maximize the number of reads mapped as a proper pair and minimize reads where forward and reverse reads mapped to different contigs. The constructed reduced-representation reference encompassed a total 10,874,990 base pairs across 37,872 fragments (mean 287 bp; mode 307 bp). Reads were mapped to the reduced-representation reference using BWA (Match=1, mismatch penalty=3 and gap penalty=5; Li, 2013) and SNPs called using freebayes (Garrison & Marth, 2012). The resulting data set was filtered to remove low quality and artefactual SNPs, paralogs, and low-quality individuals using vcftools (Danecek et al., 2011) and custom scripts following O’Leary et al. (2018), allowing for the retention of SNPs with more than 2 alleles. Genotypes with quality < 20 and < 5 reads were coded as missing, retaining loci with quality > 20, genotype call rate > 90%, and mean depth 15 – 300. Loci were also filtered based on allelic balance (remove SNPs < 0.25 and >0.75), mapping quality ratios (remove SNPs < 0.25 and >1.75), strand balance (remove SNPs with > 100x more forward alternate reads than reverse alternate reads and > 100x more forward reverse reads than reverse alternate reads), paired status, depth/quality ratio (< 0.2), and excess heterozygosity (remove SNPs > 0.5 and that deviate significantly from the expectations of Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium). Individuals with > 25% missing data were removed. Finally, rad_haplotyper (Willis et al., 2017) was used to merge SNPs on the same fragments into SNP-containing loci (hereafter microhaplotypes), by using a random sample of 20 reads per locus and recording all possible haplotypes and then discarding haplotypes that are not possible given the SNPs present in the final dataset. Loci are flagged as paralogs if too may haplotypes are called given SNP genotypes. Genotyping error is flagged if an individual as too few haplotypes given SNP genotypes). The resulting haplotyped data set was further filtered to remove loci haplotyped in < 90% of individuals, flagged as potential paralogs in > 4 individuals, or as affected by genotyping error in > 10 individuals. Technical replicates were compared to assess genotyping error, and loci systematically affected by genotyping error or flagged as deviating significantly from the expectations of Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) in > 5 sites were removed.
Facebook
TwitterCC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Patterns of population structure and historical genetic demography of blacknose sharks in the western North Atlantic Ocean were assessed using variation in nuclear-encoded microsatellites and sequences of mitochondrial (mt)DNA. Significant heterogeneity and/or inferred barriers to gene flow, based on microsatellites and/or mtDNA, revealed the occurrence of five genetic populations localized to five geographic regions: the southeastern U.S Atlantic coast, the eastern Gulf of Mexico, the western Gulf of Mexico, Campeche Bay in the southern Gulf of Mexico, and the Bahamas. Pairwise estimates of genetic divergence between sharks in the Bahamas and those in all other localities were more than an order of magnitude higher than between pairwise comparisons involving the other localities. Demographic modelling indicated that sharks in all five regions diverged after the last glacial maximum and, except for the Bahamas, experienced post-glacial, population expansion. The patterns of genetic variation also suggest that the southern Gulf of Mexico may have served as a glacial refuge and source for the expansion. Results of the study demonstrate that barriers to gene flow and historical genetic demography contributed to contemporary patterns of population structure in a coastal migratory species living in an otherwise continuous marine habitat. The results also indicate that for many marine species, failure to properly characterize barriers in terms of levels of contemporary gene flow could in part be due to inferences based solely on equilibrium assumptions. This could lead to erroneous conclusions regarding levels of connectivity in species of conservation concern.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Mexico Number of Immigrants: Campeche data was reported at 3.482 Person th in 2015. This records a decrease from the previous number of 4.971 Person th for 2010. Mexico Number of Immigrants: Campeche data is updated yearly, averaging 1.367 Person th from Dec 1975 (Median) to 2015, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.971 Person th in 2010 and a record low of 0.108 Person th in 1975. Mexico Number of Immigrants: Campeche data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Population Council. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Mexico – Table MX.G008: Number of Immigrants.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Mexico Number of Emigrants: Campeche data was reported at 2.142 Person th in 2015. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.296 Person th for 2010. Mexico Number of Emigrants: Campeche data is updated yearly, averaging 1.985 Person th from Dec 1975 (Median) to 2015, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.546 Person th in 2000 and a record low of 0.710 Person th in 1975. Mexico Number of Emigrants: Campeche data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Population Council. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Mexico – Table MX.G007: Number of Emigrants.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Mexico Life Expectancy at Birth: Male: Campeche data was reported at 71.660 Year in 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 71.550 Year for 2017. Mexico Life Expectancy at Birth: Male: Campeche data is updated yearly, averaging 69.100 Year from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2018, with 49 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 73.130 Year in 2006 and a record low of 58.990 Year in 1970. Mexico Life Expectancy at Birth: Male: Campeche data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Population Council. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Mexico – Table MX.G006: Life Expectancy at Birth: by State.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Mexico Life Expectancy at Birth: Female: Campeche data was reported at 77.560 Year in 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 77.460 Year for 2017. Mexico Life Expectancy at Birth: Female: Campeche data is updated yearly, averaging 74.680 Year from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2018, with 49 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 77.700 Year in 2012 and a record low of 61.410 Year in 1970. Mexico Life Expectancy at Birth: Female: Campeche data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Population Council. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Mexico – Table MX.G006: Life Expectancy at Birth: by State.
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Mexico Population: Male: Campeche data was reported at 473.756 Person th in 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 465.318 Person th for 2017. Mexico Population: Male: Campeche data is updated yearly, averaging 311.220 Person th from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2018, with 49 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 473.756 Person th in 2018 and a record low of 132.150 Person th in 1970. Mexico Population: Male: Campeche data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Population Council. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Mexico – Table MX.G002: Population: by State.