In 2024, around ** percent of respondents believed immigration had had a positive impact on Canada's economy. Another ** percent strongly disagreed.

To support the implementation of the Impact Assessment Act, Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) received funding over  five years (2018-23) for cumulative effects research to be conducted by three of NRCan’s science sectors – the Canada Centre for Mapping and Earth Observation within the Strategic Policy and Innovation Sector, the Canadian Forest Service, and the Geological Survey of Canada within the Lands and Minerals Sector – to conduct key earth observation, forest, and geoscience research. The overarching goal of this research is to inform regional assessment and related impact assessment processes, with a central focus on making the science and knowledge generated open and accessible to the public via the Open Science and Data Platform . Projects from all three sectors generated authoritative data on the status and trends of ecosystem parameters, as well as provided unique science and technical analysis, synthesis and advice on topics related to the cumulative effects of natural resource development. This Story Map synthesizes the cumulative effects science generated over the past five years. Through the Story Map platform, we hope to illustrate the national scale of this research program and the diversity of locations in Canada within which research has been conducted.

Canada Official International Reserves: NC: NL: Revaluation Effects data was reported at 25.000 USD mn in Apr 2020. This records an increase from the previous number of -275.000 USD mn for Mar 2020. Canada Official International Reserves: NC: NL: Revaluation Effects data is updated monthly, averaging -58.000 USD mn from Dec 2007 (Median) to Apr 2020, with 149 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.741 USD bn in Sep 2010 and a record low of -1.774 USD bn in May 2010. Canada Official International Reserves: NC: NL: Revaluation Effects data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Department of Finance Canada. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Canada – Table CA.KA002: Official International Reserves. [COVID-19-IMPACT]

This study extends the analysis of Kovak and Morrow (2022), who study the labor market effects of the FTA by comparing career trajectories for otherwise similar workers whose initial industries subsequently faced different tariff cuts under the FTA. Here, we focus on distributional impacts by examining how the effects of tariff cuts on employment and earnings differed for workers with different initial income levels. Our findings suggest that the effects of the FTA on earnings inequality were small, and the point estimates imply a slight reduction in earnings inequality among workers employed in manufacturing prior to the FTA’s enactment.

While the value of agriculture to the Canadian economy is well established, its extensive indirect and induced value through upstream and downstream industries is not. Input-Output (I/O) analyzes are a common tool that measure the direct, indirect and induced impacts of an industry to the entire economy. We reviewed I/O analyzes that used economic multipliers to estimate the total contribution of agricultural industries to Canada's economy. Reports underwent data extraction for output, Gross Domestic Product (GDP), jobs, labor income and taxes generated. We found that when indirect and induced economic impacts are considered, the value of agricultural industries is much greater than traditional valuations indicate. Beef and canola were the two largest industries in terms of GDP and jobs, with direct impacts constituting less than half of their total impacts. Recent and thorough I/O analyzes are available for only a limited number of agricultural industries. There is a need for I/O analyzes covering key agricultural industries at the regional and national level using uniform methodology and recent data and multipliers. This information is essential to gain a systemic understanding of the true economic value of agriculture and to inform policies and investment that maximizes the potential of agricultural industries.

"Listening to Canadians" is a public opinion survey, which was conducted three times a year. These surveys measure Canadians' views on public policy priorities and their assessment of how the Government of Canada serves Canadians in responding to those priorities. The surveys were conducted by Communications Canada. The questions ask opinions on Governemnt of Canada priorities, the internet, access to Government information and the ability to access Government services. The respondents were also asked questions so that they could be grouped according to geographic and social variables. Topics of interest include: Canada in 1 years time; Contact with Government; Government service; Contact Government through what method; Delivery of Government service; Service ratings; Economic future of Canada; Canada's future; Government performance in particular areas; Government advertisements; Government of Canada's focus; Government priority of the next 5yrs; Internet; The internet's effect on Government; Local issue Government should focus on; New Brunswick Government services; Summit of the Americas; Northern Canadians Basic demographic variables are also included.

This statistic represents Canadians' concerns about whether the changing climate was a threat to the next generation. Nearly half of the respondents declared they were very or even extremely concerned.

Detailed results from the Algorithmic Impact Assessment (AIA) for the Spouse or Common-Law Partner in Canada Advanced Analytics Project. This project seeks to streamline the eligibility assessment for both the Sponsor and Principal Applicant of Spouse or Common-law Partner in Canada applications.

Percentage of Internet users who have experienced selected personal effects in their life because of the Internet and the use of social networking websites or apps, during the past 12 months.

Replication package for: The Long-Run Labor Market Effects of the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, published in the Review of Economic Studies. The replication package includes all publicly available data and all code required to replicate the results in the paper.

This table contains 288 series, with data for years 2001 - 2001 (not all combinations necessarily have data for all years). This table contains data described by the following dimensions (Not all combinations are available): Geography (1 items: Canada ...) Type of effect due to waiting (12 items: Effect due to waiting for specialized services; worry; anxiety or stress; Effect due to waiting for specialized services; pain; Effect due to waiting for specialized services; general deterioration of health; Effect due to waiting for specialized services; problems with activities of daily living ...) Type of specialized service (3 items: Specialist visits; Non-emergency surgeries; Selected diagnostic tests ...) Characteristics (8 items: Number of persons; Low 95% confidence interval; number of persons; Coefficient of variation; number of persons; High 95% confidence interval; number of persons ...).

Survey data, 2019, n=1539, Canada Age, Environmental Concern, Political Ideology, Education, Gender

In 2022, Canada's gross domestic product (GDP) might recover by 4.5 percent compared to the previous year. Similarly, an increase of around one percent has been projected for 2023.

Anyone can report a side effect to a health or cannabis product. Your report can help make these products safer for all Canadians. Report the issue as soon as possible after the reaction or problem occurred. You should do this even if you are not sure if a particular health or cannabis product was the cause.

In 2024, the direct health systems costs associated with cancer reached an estimated 30.2 billion Canadian dollars. Direct out-of-pocket costs amounted to 3.7 billion Canadian dollars, while a further 1.3 billion dollars were associated with indirect costs of cancer.

In 2024, over half of the Canadian population believed that refugees made a positive contribution to Canada. Only 35 percent thought the opposite, which is substantially lower than the global average.

Establishing connections among natural landscapes is the most frequently recommended strategy for adapting management of natural resources in response to climate change. The U.S. Northern Rockies still support a full suite of native wildlife, and survival of these populations depends on connected landscapes. Connected landscapes support current migration and dispersal as well as future shifts in species ranges that will be necessary for species to adapt to our changing climate. Working in partnership with state and federal resource managers and private land trusts, we sought to: 1) understand how future climate change may alter habitat composition of landscapes expected to serve as important connections for wildlife, 2) estimate how wildlife species of concern are expected to respond to these changes, 3) develop climate-smart strategies to help stakeholders manage public and private lands in ways that allow wildlife to continue to move in response to changing conditions, and 4) explore how well existing management plans and conservation efforts are expected to support crucial connections for wildlife under climate change. We assessed vulnerability of eight wildlife species and four biomes to climate change, with a focus on potential impacts to connectivity. Our assessment provides some insights about where these species and biomes may be most vulnerable or most resilient to loss of connectivity and how this information could support climate-smart management action. We also encountered high levels of uncertainty in how climate change is expected to alter vegetation and how wildlife are expected to respond to these changes. This uncertainty limits the value of our assessment for informing proactive management of climate change impacts on both species-specific and biome-level connectivity (although biome-level assessments were subject to fewer sources of uncertainty). We offer suggestions for improving the management relevance of future studies based on our own insights and those of managers and biologists who participated in this assessment and provided critical review of this report.

MedEffect Canada provides consumers, patients, and health professionals with easy access to report an adverse reaction or side effect

This report assesses the economic impact of Canada’s copyright-based industries. It presents current data on the contributions of the copyright-based industries to the national economy between 2009 and 2019 in three thematic sections: gross domestic product (GDP); employment; and international trade.

Largely due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Canada’s merchandise trade —and merchandise trade around the world—has been volatile in the last two years. Business closures to control the spread of the virus, shifts in spending patterns, volatile commodity prices, and lingering supply chain issues have all contributed to the disruptions in trade. Between February 2020 and May 2020, Canadian imports and exports both fell 29%. As pandemic restrictions gradually eased, monetary policy become more accommodating, fiscal supports materialized, and Canadians transitioned to working online, Canadian trade rebounded. As of October 2021, Canadian merchandise imports were 5.7% above 2019 average (pre-pandemic) levels, while Canadian merchandise exports were 13% above pre-pandemic levels. However, the fall and subsequent recovery of Canadian trade is more complicated than the simple narrative that things have returned to normal. In general, two components determine the value of Canadian trade: the quantity of goods traded and the price paid for those goods. Examining the quantity and price changes over the last two years provides more nuance on what actually changed during the pandemic, and contributes to a clearer narrative of the emerging trends in merchandise trade.