The Public-Use Microdata File (PUMF) for the Canadian Housing Survey (CHS) provides information on core housing need, dwelling characteristics and housing tenure, perceptions on economic hardship from housing costs, dwelling and neighbourhood satisfaction, housing moves and intentions to move, community engagement, life and community satisfaction and socio-demographic characteristics. The production of this file includes many safeguards to prevent the identification of any one person or household.

In 1991, the National Task Force on Health Information cited a number of issues and problems with the health information system. To respond to these issues, the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), Statistics Canada and Health Canada joined forces to create a Health Information Roadmap. From this mandate, the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) was conceived. The CCHS is a cross-sectional survey that collects information related to health status, health care utilization and health determinants for the Canadian population. The survey is offered in both official languages. It relies upon a large sample of respondents and is designed to provide reliable estimates at the health region level every 2 years. The CCHS has the following objectives: Support health surveillance programs by providing health data at the national, provincial and intra-provincial levels Provide a single data source for health research on small populations and rare characteristics Timely release of information easily accessible to a diverse community of users Create a flexible survey instrument that includes a rapid response option to address emerging issues related to the health of the population The CCHS produces an annual microdata file and a file combining two years of data. The CCHS collection years with both consistent design and consistent population representation can also be combined by users to examine populations or rare characteristics. The primary use of the CCHS data is for health surveillance and population health research. Federal and provincial departments of health and human resources, social service agencies, and other types of government agencies use the information collected from respondents to monitor, plan, implement and evaluate programs to improve the health of Canadians. Researchers from various fields use the information to conduct research to improve health. Non-profit health organizations and the media use the CCHS results to raise awareness about health, an issue of concern to all Canadians.

This table contains 624 series, with data for years 2010 - 2010 (not all combinations necessarily have data for all years). This table contains data described by the following dimensions (Not all combinations are available): Geography (13 items: Canada; Atlantic Region; Newfoundland and Labrador; Prince Edward Island; ...); Statistic (1 item: Average expenditure per household); Food expenditures, summary-level categories (48 items: Food expenditures; Food purchased from stores; Bakery products;Bread and unsweetened rolls and buns; ...).

The Canadian Digital Health Survey is a series of surveys conducted annually commissioned by Canada Health Infoway (Infoway) through a third-party vendor. These annually conducted surveys are based on a variety of specific system utilization and attitudinal tracking metrics used in previous years as well as new areas of inquiry. The surveys include core tracking questions as well as new questions that will provide actionable insights to help advance the digital health landscape in Canada. For visualization and be able to filter data to gain insights into the Canadian digital health landscape, please visit Infoway's interactive data and analytics hub: https://insights.infoway-inforoute.ca/

The public use microdata file (PUMF) from the Canadian Internet Use Survey (CIUS) provides data on the adoption and use of digital technologies and the online behaviors of individuals 15 years of age and older living in the ten provinces of Canada. The survey is built off the previous iteration of the CIUS, last conducted in 2012. While there is some comparability with the 2012 CIUS, the 2018 survey was redesigned in 2018 to reflect the rapid pace at which Internet technology has evolved since the previous survey iteration. The files include information on how individuals use the Internet, smartphones, and social networking websites and apps, including their intensity of use, demand for certain online activities, and interactions through these technologies. It also provides information on the use of online government services, digital skills, online work, and security, privacy and trust as it relates to the Internet.

This table contains 12960 series, with data for years 2000 - 2000 (not all combinations necessarily have data for all years). This table contains data described by the following dimensions (Not all combinations are available): Geography (15 items: Canada; Nova Scotia; Newfoundland and Labrador; Prince Edward Island ...) Age group (12 items: Total; 15 years and over; 20-34 years; 20-24 years; 15-19 years ...) - Sex (3 items: Both sexes; Females; Males ...) Patient satisfaction - health care services (3 items: Received health care services in past 12 months; Quality of health care services received rated as excellent or good; Very or somewhat satisfied with health care services received ...) Characteristics (8 items: Number of persons; High 95% confidence interval - number of persons; Coefficient of variation for number of persons; Low 95% confidence interval - number of persons ...).

Abstract

In order to develop various methods of comparable data collection on health and health system responsiveness WHO started a scientific survey study in 2000-2001. This study has used a common survey instrument in nationally representative populations with modular structure for assessing health of indviduals in various domains, health system responsiveness, household health care expenditures, and additional modules in other areas such as adult mortality and health state valuations.

The health module of the survey instrument was based on selected domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and was developed after a rigorous scientific review of various existing assessment instruments. The responsiveness module has been the result of ongoing work over the last 2 years that has involved international consultations with experts and key informants and has been informed by the scientific literature and pilot studies.

Questions on household expenditure and proportionate expenditure on health have been borrowed from existing surveys. The survey instrument has been developed in multiple languages using cognitive interviews and cultural applicability tests, stringent psychometric tests for reliability (i.e. test-retest reliability to demonstrate the stability of application) and most importantly, utilizing novel psychometric techniques for cross-population comparability.

The study was carried out in 61 countries completing 71 surveys because two different modes were intentionally used for comparison purposes in 10 countries. Surveys were conducted in different modes of in- person household 90 minute interviews in 14 countries; brief face-to-face interviews in 27 countries and computerized telephone interviews in 2 countries; and postal surveys in 28 countries. All samples were selected from nationally representative sampling frames with a known probability so as to make estimates based on general population parameters.

The survey study tested novel techniques to control the reporting bias between different groups of people in different cultures or demographic groups ( i.e. differential item functioning) so as to produce comparable estimates across cultures and groups. To achieve comparability, the selfreports of individuals of their own health were calibrated against well-known performance tests (i.e. self-report vision was measured against standard Snellen's visual acuity test) or against short descriptions in vignettes that marked known anchor points of difficulty (e.g. people with different levels of mobility such as a paraplegic person or an athlete who runs 4 km each day) so as to adjust the responses for comparability . The same method was also used for self-reports of individuals assessing responsiveness of their health systems where vignettes on different responsiveness domains describing different levels of responsiveness were used to calibrate the individual responses.

This data are useful in their own right to standardize indicators for different domains of health (such as cognition, mobility, self care, affect, usual activities, pain, social participation, etc.) but also provide a better measurement basis for assessing health of the populations in a comparable manner. The data from the surveys can be fed into composite measures such as "Healthy Life Expectancy" and improve the empirical data input for health information systems in different regions of the world. Data from the surveys were also useful to improve the measurement of the responsiveness of different health systems to the legitimate expectations of the population.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

POSTAL

1,487 named individuals were selected from the Karom Group of Companies, Dialogue Canada household mail panel. This mail panel includes a cross-section of Canadians, with the exception of those living in the Yukon, Northwest Territories or Nunavut, from which a sample can be obtained to represent the Canadian population according to the most recent Statistics Canada data. The panel file was stratified by regions in Canada: city size, French Quebec and rest of Canada and ordered by postcode. The 1,487 named individuals were selected from the Dialogue Mail panel file, using a random method on the sample sorted by postcode.

Individual members of each household who were asked to complete the survey were identified by birth date and gender with this identifying information.

From the initial 1,487 mailed out, 816 questionnaires came back hence reaching a response rate of 55%.

CATI

The sample was drawn in such a way that it represented the Canadian population with the exception of the Canadians living in the Yukon, Northwest Territories or Nunavut.

The sampling model relied on the stratification of the population by ten provinces and by six community sizes. Telephone numbers were selected from the most recently published telephone directories. These numbers acted as "seeds" from which the sample was actually generated. The original "seed" telephone numbers were not used in the sample. Both unlisted numbers and numbers listed after the directory publication are included in the sample.

From within each household contacted, respondents 18 years of age and older were screened for random selection using the most recent birthday method.

From the 12,350 total calls made, 778 calls completed the interview. Among the 12,350 calls, 8,466 were ineligibles and from the latter, 5,305 calls for which the respondent was unavailable. The net response rate is therefore 24.6%.

Mode of data collection

Mail Questionnaire [mail]

Cleaning operations

Data Coding At each site the data was coded by investigators to indicate the respondent status and the selection of the modules for each respondent within the survey design. After the interview was edited by the supervisor and considered adequate it was entered locally.

Data Entry Program A data entry program was developed in WHO specifically for the survey study and provided to the sites. It was developed using a database program called the I-Shell (short for Interview Shell), a tool designed for easy development of computerized questionnaires and data entry (34). This program allows for easy data cleaning and processing.

The data entry program checked for inconsistencies and validated the entries in each field by checking for valid response categories and range checks. For example, the program didn’t accept an age greater than 120. For almost all of the variables there existed a range or a list of possible values that the program checked for.

In addition, the data was entered twice to capture other data entry errors. The data entry program was able to warn the user whenever a value that did not match the first entry was entered at the second data entry. In this case the program asked the user to resolve the conflict by choosing either the 1st or the 2nd data entry value to be able to continue. After the second data entry was completed successfully, the data entry program placed a mark in the database in order to enable the checking of whether this process had been completed for each and every case.

Data Transfer The data entry program was capable of exporting the data that was entered into one compressed database file which could be easily sent to WHO using email attachments or a file transfer program onto a secure server no matter how many cases were in the file. The sites were allowed the use of as many computers and as many data entry personnel as they wanted. Each computer used for this purpose produced one file and they were merged once they were delivered to WHO with the help of other programs that were built for automating the process. The sites sent the data periodically as they collected it enabling the checking procedures and preliminary analyses in the early stages of the data collection.

Data quality checks Once the data was received it was analyzed for missing information, invalid responses and representativeness. Inconsistencies were also noted and reported back to sites.

Data Cleaning and Feedback After receipt of cleaned data from sites, another program was run to check for missing information, incorrect information (e.g. wrong use of center codes), duplicated data, etc. The output of this program was fed back to sites regularly. Mainly, this consisted of cases with duplicate IDs, duplicate cases (where the data for two respondents with different IDs were identical), wrong country codes, missing age, sex, education and some other important variables.

The National Survey of Canadian Nurses is a series of surveys commissioned by Canada Health Infoway (Infoway) and conducted in partnership with the Canadian Nurses Association (CNA) and the Canadian Nursing Informatics Association (CNIA) through a third-party vendor. The main objective of these national surveys of nurses is to investigate the use of digital health technologies in nursing practice across Canada. For visualization and be able to filter data to gain insights into the Canadian digital health landscape, please visit Infoway's interactive data and analytics hub: https://insights.infoway-inforoute.ca/

This infographic describes results on volunteering from the 2013 General Social Survey (GSS) on Giving, Volunteering and Participating. The survey was undertaken to better understand how Canadians support individuals and communities on their own or through their involvement with charitable and non-profit organizations.

The CIS (Canadian Income Survey) Dataset contains detailed demographic, economic, and employment-related data of individuals across different provinces in Canada. The dataset is designed to assess key factors affecting income levels, employment history, and financial well-being at an individual level.

🔹 Dataset Overview

Total Variables: 36 (Covering demographic, employment, and financial attributes) Purpose: Used for analyzing income distribution, labor market trends, and economic well-being in Canada. Data Type: A mix of categorical, numerical, and binary data (e.g., Age, Gender, Income, Employment Status). Key Topics Covered: Demographics: Age, Gender, Marital Status, Immigrant Status Education & Employment: Highest Education, Years Worked, Weeks Employed Financial Data: Income after tax, Capital Gains, Pension, Investments Social Benefits: Childcare Benefits, Employment Insurance, Government Assistance

🔹 Significance of the Dataset ✔ Helps policymakers understand income inequality and poverty levels. ✔ Used for research on employment patterns and financial security. ✔ Supports decision-making on government subsidies and social welfare programs.

The Canada Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating 2007 is the latest iteration of a series of surveys that began with the National Survey of Giving, Volunteering and participating. It was conducted by Statistics Canada in 1997 as a supplement to the Labour Force Survey, and was repeated in the fall of 2000. In 2001, the federal government provided funding to establish a permanent survey program on charitable giving, volunteering and participating within Statistics Canada. The survey itself was renamed the Canada Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating (CSGVP). The CSGVP was developed through a partnership of federal government departments and voluntary sector organizations. These include Canadian Heritage, Health Canada, Human Resources and Social Development Canada, Imagine Canada, the Public Health Agency of Canada, Statistics Canada and Volunteer Canada. There are two data files for the 2007 Canada Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating (CSGVP): the Main answer file (MAIN.TXT), and the giving file (GS.TXT). The 2007 CSGVP was conducted by Statistics Canada in the provinces and territories from September 10th to December 8th 2007.

This table contains 30 series, with data for years 1980 - 1996 (not all combinations necessarily have data for all years), and is no longer being released. This table contains data described by the following dimensions (Not all combinations are available): Geography (1 item: Canada), Travel duration (3 items: Total, same day and overnight travel; Same day; Overnight), Age group (10 items: All ages; Under 15 years; 15-19 years; 20-24 years; ...).

Canada BOS: Future Sales Indicators: Balance of Opinion data was reported at 22.000 % in Mar 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 30.000 % for Dec 2024. Canada BOS: Future Sales Indicators: Balance of Opinion data is updated quarterly, averaging 27.000 % from Sep 2003 (Median) to Mar 2025, with 87 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 81.000 % in Jun 2021 and a record low of -58.000 % in Jun 2020. Canada BOS: Future Sales Indicators: Balance of Opinion data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Bank of Canada. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Canada – Table CA.S003: Business Outlook Survey. Business Outlook Survey Questionnaire: Indicators of Future Sales - Compared with 12 months ago, have your recent indicators (order books, advanced bookings, sales inquiries, etc.)… [COVID-19-IMPACT]

Business Climate Indicator in Canada decreased to -2.42 points in the second quarter of 2025 from -2.12 points in the first quarter of 2025. This dataset provides - Canada Business Outlook Survey Indicator- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Users can download the survey's report and entire data set to gain information on a variety of health indicators in the United States and Canada. Background The Joint Canada/ United States Health Survey was a one time study conducted with Statistics Canada and the National Center for Health Statistics at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Both countries conducted the same survey to gather information regarding: health status, limitations of activities, asthma and other medical conditions, mental health, smoking, use of prescription medicines, physical activities, patient satisfaction, health insurance, and health care utilization. User Functionality Users can download the full report of the survey or the entire data set. Data Notes The Joint Canada/ United States Health Survey was conducted in 2002 and 2003. It was a one time telephone survey, with 3,200 Canadian participants and 5,200 American participants.

This table contains 336 series, with data for years 1999 - 2009 (not all combinations necessarily have data for all years), and was last released on 2014-06-19. This table contains data described by the following dimensions (Not all combinations are available): Geography (14 items: Canada; Prince Edward Island; Newfoundland and Labrador; Nova Scotia ...), Year of vehicle model (24 items: Total; all vehicle model years; Current year minus 17 years; Current year minus 19 years or more; Current year minus 18 years ...).

Abstract

Objectives: The main objective of the survey is to provide information about Canadian adults whose daily activities are limited because of a long-term condition or health-related problem. This information will be used to plan and evaluate services, programs and policies for adults with disabilities to help enable their full participation in Canadian society. Information from the CSD will be used by all levels of government, as well as associations for persons with disabilities and researchers working in the field of disability. Data may be used to plan and evaluate policies and programs for Canadian adults with disabilities to help enable their full participation in society. In particular, information on adults with disabilities is essential for the effective development and operation of the Employment Equity Program. Data on disability are also used to fulfil Canada's international agreement relating to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Reference Period: 2013-01-13

Periodicity of Data Collection: Quinquennial

Geographic coverage

Whole country

Analysis unit

Individuals

Universe

Population groups: 15 years and over

Total population covered: All

Economic activities: All economic activities

Sectors covered: All sectors

Labor force status: Employed persons, unemployed persons, persons outside labour force

Status in Employment: Employees, employers, own-account workers, contributing family workers, members of producers' cooperatives

Establishments: NR

Other limitations: Survey covers all age groups 15 years and over, the employment statistics cover only those aged 15 to 64

Classifications: Sex, age, level of education, other personal characteristics, type of living arrangements, status in employment, occupation (classification system: NOC), economic activity (classification system: NAICS), type of disability

Cross-classification: Na

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Frequency of data collection

Periodicity of Data collection: Quinquennial

This table contains 12 series, with data for years 1980 - 1996 (not all combinations necessarily have data for all years), and is no longer being released. This table contains data described by the following dimensions (Not all combinations are available): Geography (1 item: Canada), Travel duration (3 items: Total, same day and overnight travel; Same day; Overnight), Age and sex (4 items: Total both sexes, all ages; Both sexes, under 15 years; Males, 15 years and over; Females, 15 years and over).

This table contains the X-ray source catalogs for the XMM-Newton surveys of the 3 and 14 hours Right Ascension (hereafter 3-h and 14-h, respectively) fields from the Canada-France Redshift Survey. (These fields are also known as the Groth Strip). The X-ray sources cover the 0.5-10 keV flux range from ~2 x 10^-15 - 10^-13 erg/cm²/s. The authors have used a subset of the XMM-Newton sources, which have Chandra positions, to determine the best method of obtaining optical identifications of sources with only XMM-Newton positions. They have found optical identifications for 79% of the XMM-Newton sources for which there were deep optical images. The sources without optical identifications are likely to be optically fainter and have higher redshifts than the sources with identifications. The authors have estimated 'photometric redshifts' for the identified sources, calibrating their method using ~200 galaxies in the fields with spectroscopic redshifts. They find that the redshift distribution has a strong peak at z~0.7. This table was created by the HEASARC in July 2005 based on CDS table J/MNRAS/350/785/tablea12.dat (the merged Tables A1 and A2 from the published paper). This is a service provided by NASA HEASARC .

Objective: Much of the extensive quantitative research linking socio-economic position (SEP) and health utilizes three common indicators: income, occupation and education. Existing survey data may enable researchers to include indicators of additional forms of capital in their analyses, permitting more nuanced consideration of the relationship between SEP and health. Our objective was to identify the breadth of survey questions related to economic, cultural, and social capital available through Statistics Canada surveys, and the extent to which those surveys also include health measures.Methods: We compiled a list of all population-based Statistics Canada surveys, and developed a broad list of potential indicators of forms of capital. We systematically searched the surveys for those indicators and health measures, analyzing their co-occurrence.Results: Traditional SEP indicators were present in 73% of surveys containing health measures, while additional indicators of social and cultural capital were available in 57%.Conclusion: Existing national survey data represent an under-exploited opportunity for research examining the relationship between various forms of capital and health in Canada. Future empirical explorations of these data could enrich our theoretical understanding of health inequities.