This report documents and explains the scale, scope, and structure of the network media economy in Canada, examining which media are growing, stagnating, or declining, and whether media are becoming more diverse and pluralistic or more centralized and concentrated. It focuses on telecoms, internet access, digital markets, and traditional media, highlighting the ongoing battle between Canadian telecom conglomerates and multinational big tech companies, streaming giants, and international media conglomerates. The goal is to provide a comprehensive analysis of these complex interactions and their implications for communications in Canada.

Canada CA: Rule of Law: Estimate data was reported at 1.801 NA in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1.841 NA for 2016. Canada CA: Rule of Law: Estimate data is updated yearly, averaging 1.764 NA from Dec 1996 (Median) to 2017, with 19 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.891 NA in 2014 and a record low of 1.647 NA in 1996. Canada CA: Rule of Law: Estimate data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Canada – Table CA.World Bank.WGI: Country Governance Indicators. Rule of Law captures perceptions of the extent to which agents have confidence in and abide by the rules of society, and in particular the quality of contract enforcement, property rights, the police, and the courts, as well as the likelihood of crime and violence. Estimate gives the country's score on the aggregate indicator, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5.

Combined Violent and Property Crime Offenses Known to Law Enforcement in Canadian County, OK was 188.00000 Known Incidents in January of 2021, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, Combined Violent and Property Crime Offenses Known to Law Enforcement in Canadian County, OK reached a record high of 245.00000 in January of 2014 and a record low of 82.00000 in January of 2007. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Combined Violent and Property Crime Offenses Known to Law Enforcement in Canadian County, OK - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on July of 2025.

Canada E-Commerce Transactions: AOV: Law & Government: Legal data was reported at 147.795 USD in 10 May 2025. This records an increase from the previous number of 112.658 USD for 09 May 2025. Canada E-Commerce Transactions: AOV: Law & Government: Legal data is updated daily, averaging 83.626 USD from May 2019 (Median) to 10 May 2025, with 125 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1,166.776 USD in 03 Oct 2023 and a record low of 2.408 USD in 25 Aug 2019. Canada E-Commerce Transactions: AOV: Law & Government: Legal data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Grips Intelligence Inc.. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Canada – Table CA.GI.EC: E-Commerce Transactions: by Category.

Section 4.2 of the Department of Justice Act requires the Minister of Justice to prepare a Charter Statement for every government bill to help inform public and Parliamentary debate on government bills. One of the Minister of Justice’s most important responsibilities is to examine legislation for inconsistency with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms [“the Charter”]. By tabling a Charter Statement, the Minister is sharing some of the key considerations that informed the review of a bill for inconsistency with the Charter. A Statement identifies Charter rights and freedoms that may potentially be engaged by a bill and provides a brief explanation of the nature of any engagement, in light of the measures being proposed. A Charter Statement also identifies potential justifications for any limits a bill may impose on Charter rights and freedoms. Section 1 of the Charter provides that rights and freedoms may be subject to reasonable limits if those limits are prescribed by law and demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. This means that Parliament may enact laws that limit Charter rights and freedoms. The Charter will be violated only where a limit is not demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society. A Charter Statement is intended to provide legal information to the public and Parliament on a bill’s potential effects on rights and freedoms that are neither trivial nor too speculative. It is not intended to be a comprehensive overview of all conceivable Charter considerations. Additional considerations relevant to the constitutionality of a bill may also arise in the course of Parliamentary study and amendment of a bill. A Statement is not a legal opinion on the constitutionality of a bill.

The statistic depicts Mexico's real gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate from 2020 to 2024, with projections up until 2030. GDP refers to the total market value of all goods and services that are produced within a country per year. It is an important indicator of the economic strength of a country. Real GDP is adjusted for price changes and is therefore regarded as a key indicator for economic growth. In 2024, Mexico's real GDP grew by about 1.45 percent compared to the previous year. Mexico's economy Mexico, having not been dramatically affected by the 2002 South American crisis, has one of the strongest economies in the Americas behind the United States and Canada. By improving its macroeconomic rules and regulations, Mexico improved on many aspects of its economy, most notably inflation. Several goals that the government wanted accomplish were the improvement of infrastructure around the country as well as newer tax laws that would allow for higher income equality. Mexico is generally an export-oriented country, with the majority of export goods consisting of electronics, automobiles and agricultural goods. Exports over the past decade have seen continuous growth, with the exception of 2009. This increase in exports is largely due to an increasing number of free trade agreements with international countries, which essentially eliminate tariffs between member countries. However, Mexico imports more than they export, having recorded an annual trade deficit over the past decade. While most economics label this as a negative aspect, other economics believe that trade deficits are associated with positive economic developments.

The data and programs replicate tables and figures from "New Deal, New Patriots: How 1930s Government Spending Boosted Patriotism During WWII", by Caprettini and Voth. Please see the README file for additional details.

Canada E-Commerce Transactions: Value: Law & Government: Legal data was reported at 3,694.876 USD in 10 May 2025. This records an increase from the previous number of 3,379.745 USD for 09 May 2025. Canada E-Commerce Transactions: Value: Law & Government: Legal data is updated daily, averaging 678.229 USD from May 2019 (Median) to 10 May 2025, with 125 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 14,001.307 USD in 03 Oct 2023 and a record low of 2.408 USD in 25 Aug 2019. Canada E-Commerce Transactions: Value: Law & Government: Legal data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Grips Intelligence Inc.. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Canada – Table CA.GI.EC: E-Commerce Transactions: by Category.

Canada E-Commerce Transactions: Volume: Law & Government: Legal data was reported at 25.000 Unit in 10 May 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 30.000 Unit for 09 May 2025. Canada E-Commerce Transactions: Volume: Law & Government: Legal data is updated daily, averaging 8.000 Unit from May 2019 (Median) to 10 May 2025, with 125 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 60.000 Unit in 05 May 2025 and a record low of 1.000 Unit in 15 Mar 2025. Canada E-Commerce Transactions: Volume: Law & Government: Legal data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Grips Intelligence Inc.. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Canada – Table CA.GI.EC: E-Commerce Transactions: by Category.

CRIC Survey, 2001 The purpose of this survey is to gauge the views of Canadians.

Canada Women, Business and the Law Index: Workplace Score data was reported at 100.000 Score in 2023. This stayed constant from the previous number of 100.000 Score for 2022. Canada Women, Business and the Law Index: Workplace Score data is updated yearly, averaging 100.000 Score from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2023, with 54 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 100.000 Score in 2023 and a record low of 50.000 Score in 1984. Canada Women, Business and the Law Index: Workplace Score data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Canada – Table CA.World Bank.WBL: Governance: Women, Business and the Law Index: Annual.

This dataset covers ballots 351-53, and 355-56 spanning January, March, May, September, and October 1972. The dataset contains the data resulting from these polls in ASCII. The ballots are as follows: 351 - January This Gallup poll seeks the opinions of Canadians, on predominantly political and social issues. The questions ask opinions about political leaders and political issues within the country and throughout the world. There are also questions regarding class favouring laws, the welfare system and guaranteed annual income. The respondents were also asked questions so that they could be grouped according to geographical variables. Topics of interest include: the amount of U.S. capital in Canada; the approval of guaranteed annual income; the best political party for the future; class favouring laws in Canada; conditions of today versus the past year; how respondents feel about the United States; opinion of NDP leader David Lewis; opinion of Stanfield; opinion of Trudeau; respect for the United Nations; the seriousness of governmental leaks to the press; the seriousness of Quebec separation; the strength of Quebec separation; welfare system ratings; and what influences voting choices. Basic demographic variables are also included. 352 - March This Gallup poll seeks the opinions of Canadians, on political and social issues. Topics of interest include: emigrating from Canada, political involvement, Trudeau vs Stanfield as potential prime minister, the right to strike, opinions on the Liberal term, government support for less populated provinces, how the U.S. conceives of its relationship with Canada, voting behavior, voting outcomes, whether political parties should be financially transparent, and pollution. Basic demographic variables are also included. 353 - May This Gallup poll seeks the opinions of Canadians, on predominantly political and social issues. The questions ask opinions about political issues, bilingualism and unemployment. The respondents were also asked questions so that they could be grouped according to geographical variables. Topics of interest include: the agreement to clear the pollution in the Great Lakes; bilingualism in Canada; the degree of interest in the next Federal election; expanding the NHL; the greatest threat to the future; the importance of basic human rights; the most important problem in Canada; political position (left wing-right wing); the productivity of Canadian workers; the option of remaining on unemployment insurance instead of working; the problem of inflation; the problem of unemployment; whether or not Trudeau conduct is appropriate in parliament; and if the United States sincerely respects the Canadian identity. Basic demographic variables are also included. 355 - September This Gallup poll seeks the opinions of Canadians, on political and social issues. The questions ask opinions about political leaders and the upcoming Federal election. There are also questions on other topics of interest and importance to the country and government, such as the problems facing Canada and the availability of birth control for teens. The respondents were also asked questions so that they could be grouped according to geographical variables. Topics of interest include: accepting Ugandan refugees; the availability of birth control to teens; the best political party to handle the problems facing Canada; confidence in United States' problem solving; being eligible to vote; giving provinces more power; what influences voting decisions; interest in the Federal election; the likelihood of voting in the Federal election; M.P.'s voting habits; the most important problem facing Canada; the political party with the best leader; the political party with the best policies; voluntary wage restraint; and women having the right to choose an abortion. Basic demographic variables are also included. 356 - October This Gallup poll seeks the opinions of Canadians, on predominantly political and social issues. The questions ask opinions on political issues within the country; such as voting habits and issues regarding the upcoming Federal election. There are also questions regarding tax relief, inflation and unemployment. The respondents were also asked questions so that they could be grouped according to geographical variables. Topics of interest include: the amount of taxes paid by corporations; the certainty of voting in the upcoming Federal election; corporate tax relief; the ease at which to get unemployment insurance; the improved Canadian economy; improvements in inflation; the increase of unemployment insurance; the interest in the upcoming Federal election; the leader with the best campaign; Lewis's criticism of corporate tax; the most sincere leader; and whether or not a respondents name is on the voters list. Basic demographic variables are also included.

Canada E-Commerce Transactions: Value: Law & Government data was reported at 1,238.720 USD in 03 May 2025. This records an increase from the previous number of 812.134 USD for 02 May 2025. Canada E-Commerce Transactions: Value: Law & Government data is updated daily, averaging 276.302 USD from Jan 2019 (Median) to 03 May 2025, with 854 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 14,001.307 USD in 03 Oct 2023 and a record low of 2.408 USD in 25 Aug 2019. Canada E-Commerce Transactions: Value: Law & Government data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Grips Intelligence Inc.. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Canada – Table CA.GI.EC: E-Commerce Transactions: by Category.

Canada E-Commerce Transactions: Volume: Law & Government: Government data was reported at 4.000 Unit in 13 Apr 2024. This records an increase from the previous number of 1.000 Unit for 03 Apr 2024. Canada E-Commerce Transactions: Volume: Law & Government: Government data is updated daily, averaging 1.000 Unit from Jan 2019 (Median) to 13 Apr 2024, with 751 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 24.000 Unit in 19 Mar 2020 and a record low of 1.000 Unit in 03 Apr 2024. Canada E-Commerce Transactions: Volume: Law & Government: Government data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Grips Intelligence Inc.. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Canada – Table CA.GI.EC: E-Commerce Transactions: by Category.

The Minister of Justice prepares a "Charter Statement" to help inform the public and Parliamentary debate on a government bill. One of the Minister of Justice's most important responsibilities is to examine legislation for consistency with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ["The Charter"]. By tabling a Charter Statement, the Minister is sharing some of the key considerations that informed the review of a bill for consistency with the Charter. A Statement identifies charter rights and freedoms that may potentially be engaged by a bill and provides a brief explanation of the nature of any engagement, in light of the measures being proposed. A Charter Statement also identifies potential justifications for any limits a bill may impose on Charter rights and freedoms. A Charter Statement is intended to provide legal information to the public and Parliament. It is NOT intended to be a comprehensive overview of Charter considerations, recognizing that a bill may change over the course of its passage through Parliament. Additional considerations relevant to the constitutionality of a bill may also arise in the course of Parliamentary study. A Statement is NOT a legal opinion on the constitutionality of a bill.

As industry-university collaborations are promoted to commercialize university research and foster economic growth, it is important to understand how companies benefit from these collaborations, and to ensure that resulting academic discoveries are developed for the benefit of all stakeholders: companies, universities and public. Lock up of inventions, and censoring of academic publications, should be avoided if feasible. This case-study analysis of interviews with 90 companies in Canada, Japan, the UK and USA assesses the scope of this challenge and suggests possible resolutions. The participating companies were asked to describe an important interaction with universities, and most described collaborative research. The most frequently cited tensions concerned intellectual property management and publication freedom. IP disagreements were most frequent in the context of narrowly-focused collaborations with American universities. However, in the case of exploratory research, companies accepted the IP management practices of US universities. It might make sense to let companies have an automatic exclusive license to IP from narrowly defined collaborations, but to encourage universities to manage inventions from exploratory collaborations to ensure development incentives. Although Canada, the UK and US have strong publication freedom guarantees, tensions over this issue arose frequently in focused collaborations, though were rare in exploratory collaborations. The UK Lambert Agreements give sponsors the option to control publications in return for paying the full economic cost of a project. This may offer a model for the other three countries. Uniquely among the four countries, Japan enables companies to control exclusively most collaborative inventions and to censor academic publications. Despite this high degree of control, the interviews suggest many companies do not develop university discoveries to their full potential. The steps suggested above may rebalance the situation in Japan. Overall, the interviews reveal the complexity of these issues and the need for flexibility on the part of universities and companies.

The programs replicate tables and figures from "The Long-Run Impacts of Public Industrial Investment on Local Development and Economic Mobility: Evidence from World War II," by Garin and Rothbaum. Please see the readme file for additional details.

Canada E-Commerce Transactions: AOV: Law & Government data was reported at 47.643 USD in 03 May 2025. This records an increase from the previous number of 27.071 USD for 02 May 2025. Canada E-Commerce Transactions: AOV: Law & Government data is updated daily, averaging 190.089 USD from Jan 2019 (Median) to 03 May 2025, with 854 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1,166.776 USD in 03 Oct 2023 and a record low of 2.408 USD in 25 Aug 2019. Canada E-Commerce Transactions: AOV: Law & Government data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Grips Intelligence Inc.. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Canada – Table CA.GI.EC: E-Commerce Transactions: by Category.

Section 4.2 of the Department of Justice Act requires the Minister of Justice to prepare a Charter Statement for every government bill to help inform public and Parliamentary debate on government bills. One of the Minister of Justice’s most important responsibilities is to examine legislation for inconsistency with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms [“the Charter”]. By tabling a Charter Statement, the Minister is sharing some of the key considerations that informed the review of a bill for inconsistency with the Charter. A Statement identifies Charter rights and freedoms that may potentially be engaged by a bill and provides a brief explanation of the nature of any engagement, in light of the measures being proposed.

A Charter Statement also identifies potential justifications for any limits a bill may impose on Charter rights and freedoms. Section 1 of the Charter provides that rights and freedoms may be subject to reasonable limits if those limits are prescribed by law and demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. This means that Parliament may enact laws that limit Charter rights and freedoms. The Charter will be violated only where a limit is not demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society.

A Charter Statement is intended to provide legal information to the public and Parliament on a bill’s potential effects on rights and freedoms that are neither trivial nor too speculative. It is not intended to be a comprehensive overview of all conceivable Charter considerations. Additional considerations relevant to the constitutionality of a bill may also arise in the course of Parliamentary study and amendment of a bill. A Statement is not a legal opinion on the constitutionality of a bill.

Section 4.2 of the Department of Justice Act requires the Minister of Justice to prepare a Charter Statement for every government bill to help inform public and Parliamentary debate on government bills. One of the Minister of Justice’s most important responsibilities is to examine legislation for inconsistency with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms [“the Charter”]. By tabling a Charter Statement, the Minister is sharing some of the key considerations that informed the review of a bill for inconsistency with the Charter. A Statement identifies Charter rights and freedoms that may potentially be engaged by a bill and provides a brief explanation of the nature of any engagement, in light of the measures being proposed. A Charter Statement also identifies potential justifications for any limits a bill may impose on Charter rights and freedoms. Section 1 of the Charter provides that rights and freedoms may be subject to reasonable limits if those limits are prescribed by law and demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. This means that Parliament may enact laws that limit Charter rights and freedoms. The Charter will be violated only where a limit is not demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society. A Charter Statement is intended to provide legal information to the public and Parliament on a bill’s potential effects on rights and freedoms that are neither trivial nor too speculative. It is not intended to be a comprehensive overview of all conceivable Charter considerations. Additional considerations relevant to the constitutionality of a bill may also arise in the course of Parliamentary study and amendment of a bill. A Statement is not a legal opinion on the constitutionality of a bill.