19 datasets found
  1. f

    DataSheet_1_Estimating complete cancer prevalence in Europe: validity of...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Jun 9, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Elena Demuru; Silvia Rossi; Leonardo Ventura; Luigino Dal Maso; Stefano Guzzinati; Alexander Katalinic; Sebastien Lamy; Valerie Jooste; Corrado Di Benedetto; Roberta De Angelis; the EUROCARE-6 Working Group (2023). DataSheet_1_Estimating complete cancer prevalence in Europe: validity of alternative vs standard completeness indexes.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1114701.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 9, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Elena Demuru; Silvia Rossi; Leonardo Ventura; Luigino Dal Maso; Stefano Guzzinati; Alexander Katalinic; Sebastien Lamy; Valerie Jooste; Corrado Di Benedetto; Roberta De Angelis; the EUROCARE-6 Working Group
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Europe
    Description

    IntroductionComparable indicators on complete cancer prevalence are increasingly needed in Europe to support survivorship care planning. Direct measures can be biased by limited registration time and estimates are needed to recover long term survivors. The completeness index method, based on incidence and survival modelling, is the standard most validated approach.MethodsWithin this framework, we consider two alternative approaches that do not require any direct modelling activity: i) empirical indices derived from long established European registries; ii) pre-calculated indices derived from US-SEER cancer registries. Relying on the EUROCARE-6 study dataset we compare standard vs alternative complete prevalence estimates using data from 62 registries in 27 countries by sex, cancer type and registration time.ResultsFor tumours mostly diagnosed in the elderly the empirical estimates differ little from standard estimates (on average less than 5% after 10-15 years of registration), especially for low prognosis cancers. For early-onset cancers (bone, brain, cervix uteri, testis, Hodgkin disease, soft tissues) the empirical method may produce substantial underestimations of complete prevalence (up to 20%) even when based on 35-year observations. SEER estimates are comparable to the standard ones for most cancers, including many early-onset tumours, even when derived from short time series (10-15 years). Longer observations are however needed when cancer-specific incidence and prognosis differ remarkably between US and European populations (endometrium, thyroid or stomach).DiscussionThese results may facilitate the dissemination of complete prevalence estimates across Europe and help bridge the current information gaps.

  2. Standard populations dataset

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Mar 12, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Matthias Kleine (2023). Standard populations dataset [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/matthiaskleine/standard-populations-dataset
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
    Authors
    Matthias Kleine
    Description

    Do you know further standard populations?

    If you know any further standard populations worth integrating in this dataset, please let me know in the discussion part. I would be happy to integrate further data to make this dataset more useful for everybody.

    German "Federal Health Monitoring System" about 'standard populations':

    "Standard populations are "artificial populations" with fictitious age structures, that are used in age standardization as uniform basis for the calculation of comparable measures for the respective reference population(s).

    Use: Age standardizations based on a standard population are often used at cancer registries to compare morbidity or mortality rates. If there are different age structures in populations of different regions or in a population in one region over time, the comparability of their mortality or morbidity rates is only limited. For interregional or inter-temporal comparisons, therefore, an age standardization is necessary. For this purpose the age structure of a reference population, the so-called standard population, is assumed for the study population. The age specific mortality or morbidity rates of the study population are weighted according to the age structure of the standard population. Selection of a standard population:

    Which standard population is used for comparison basically, does not matter. It is important, however, that

    1. the demographic structure of the standard population is not too dissimilar to that of the reference population and
    2. the comparable rates refer to the same standard."

    Aim of this dataset

    The aim of this dataset is to provide a variety of the most commonly used 'standard populations'.

    Currently, two files with 22 standard populations are provided: - standard_populations_20_age_groups.csv - 20 age groups: '0', '01-04', '05-09', '10-14', '15-19', '20-24', '25-29', '30-34', '35-39', '40-44', '45-49', '50-54', '55-59', '60-64', '65-69', '70-74', '75-79', '80-84', '85-89', '90+' - 7 standard populations: 'Standard population Germany 2011', 'Standard population Germany 1987', 'Standard population of Europe 2013', 'Standard population Old Laender 1987', 'Standard population New Laender 1987', 'New standard population of Europe', 'World standard population' - source: German Federal Health Monitoring System

    • standard_populations_19_age_groups.csv
      • 19 age groups: '0', '01-04', '05-09', '10-14', '15-19', '20-24', '25-29', '30-34', '35-39', '40-44', '45-49', '50-54', '55-59', '60-64', '65-69', '70-74', '75-79', '80-84', '85+'
      • 15 standard populations: '1940 U.S. Std Million', '1950 U.S. Std Million', '1960 U.S. Std Million', '1970 U.S. Std Million', '1980 U.S. Std Million', '1990 U.S. Std Million', '1991 Canadian Std Million', '1996 Canadian Std Million', '2000 U.S. Std Million', '2000 U.S. Std Population (Census P25-1130)', '2011 Canadian Standard Population', 'European (EU-27 plus EFTA 2011-2030) Std Million', 'European (Scandinavian 1960) Std Million', 'World (Segi 1960) Std Million', 'World (WHO 2000-2025) Std Million'
      • source: National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program

    Terms of use

    No restrictions are known to the author. Standard populations are published by different organisations for public usage.

  3. r

    Supplementary Tables to Accompany: Cannabis Genotoxicity and Cancer...

    • researchdata.edu.au
    • data.mendeley.com
    Updated 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Albert Reece; UWA Medical School (2022). Supplementary Tables to Accompany: Cannabis Genotoxicity and Cancer Incidence: Highly Concordant Synthesis of European and USA Datasets [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17632/WSZG9J6TJF.1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    2022
    Dataset provided by
    Mendeley Data
    The University of Western Australia
    Authors
    Albert Reece; UWA Medical School
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    R Code, Data and Supplementary Tables to accompany paper of above title.

  4. Cancer Registry Software Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2025-2029:...

    • technavio.com
    Updated Jun 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Technavio (2025). Cancer Registry Software Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2025-2029: North America (US, Canada, and Mexico), Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and UK), APAC (China and Japan), and Rest of World (ROW) [Dataset]. https://www.technavio.com/report/cancer-registry-software-market-industry-analysis
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 15, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    TechNavio
    Authors
    Technavio
    Time period covered
    2021 - 2025
    Area covered
    United States, Global
    Description

    Snapshot img

    Cancer Registry Software Market Size 2025-2029

    The cancer registry software market size is forecast to increase by USD 121.9 million, at a CAGR of 14% between 2024 and 2029.

    The market is witnessing significant growth due to the escalating prevalence of cancer cases worldwide. The increasing incidence of various types of cancer necessitates the implementation of advanced registry software solutions to manage and analyze patient data more efficiently. Moreover, the burgeoning clinical research in oncology further drives the demand for these systems, as they facilitate data collection, management, and analysis for research purposes. However, the market faces challenges in the form of stringent data privacy and security concerns. With the growing amount of sensitive patient information being stored and shared digitally, ensuring robust data security becomes crucial. The potential risks of data breaches and unauthorized access can significantly impact both patients and healthcare providers, necessitating the adoption of advanced security measures. Companies in the market must prioritize data security and privacy to gain the trust of healthcare organizations and patients alike.

    What will be the Size of the Cancer Registry Software Market during the forecast period?

    Explore in-depth regional segment analysis with market size data - historical 2019-2023 and forecasts 2025-2029 - in the full report.
    Request Free SampleThe market is a dynamic and evolving landscape, continually adapting to advancements in healthcare technology and the growing demand for comprehensive cancer data management. This market encompasses various applications, including disease registry management, cancer staging system, data warehousing, cancer incidence tracking, registry software architecture, data integration platform, clinical data capture, case reporting system, statistical reporting, cancer screening programs, and more. These tools play a crucial role in cancer surveillance systems, enabling the collection, analysis, and reporting of epidemiological data for public health surveillance. They facilitate data encryption for patient data privacy, ensuring HIPAA compliance. Data interoperability and data quality metrics are essential components, allowing for seamless integration of various health informatics tools. Real-time data updates and database management systems are integral to maintaining accurate and up-to-date information. Predictive modeling tools and data mining techniques contribute to risk factor identification and mortality data analysis. Data visualization tools offer valuable insights into the complexities of cancer data. Cancer registry software architecture supports population-based registry initiatives, ensuring secure data storage and registry reporting features. Oncology data management tools enable clinical data capture, case reporting, and statistical reporting, enhancing overall patient care. The ongoing development and refinement of these tools reflect the continuous unfolding of market activities and evolving patterns in cancer data management.

    How is this Cancer Registry Software Industry segmented?

    The cancer registry software industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments. End-userGovernment and third partyPharma biotech and medical device companiesHospitals and medical practicePrivate payersResearch institutesTypeStand-alone softwareIntegrated softwareDeploymentOn-premisesCloud-basedGeographyNorth AmericaUSCanadaMexicoEuropeFranceGermanyItalySpainUKAPACChinaJapanRest of World (ROW)

    By End-user Insights

    The government and third party segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.Cancer registry software solutions play a vital role in assisting government and third-party agencies in managing and analyzing data related to cancer cases. These systems enable the tracking of cancer incidence, prevalence, and mortality rates, providing essential information for public health planning, resource allocation, and policy development. Analyzing trends and patterns in registry data helps identify high-risk populations, geographic disparities, and emerging cancer types. Governments utilize cancer registry software to monitor and improve the quality of cancer care. By evaluating variations in treatment practices and adherence to clinical guidelines, they can benchmark outcomes against national or international standards. Additionally, these software solutions facilitate data interoperability, ensuring data quality metrics and HIPAA compliance. Data encryption, data visualization tools, and predictive modeling capabilities enhance the functionality of cancer registry software. Epidemiological data analysis and risk factor identificatio

  5. Table S1 from Cancer Incidence and Mortality Estimates in Arab Countries in...

    • aacr.figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated Dec 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mariam Al-Muftah; Fares Al-Ejeh (2023). Table S1 from Cancer Incidence and Mortality Estimates in Arab Countries in 2018: A GLOBOCAN Data Analysis [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.24710569.v1
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    American Association for Cancer Researchhttp://www.aacr.org/
    Authors
    Mariam Al-Muftah; Fares Al-Ejeh
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Table S1: Raw data extracted from GLOBOCAN 2018 dataset for all cancers and each cancer, for all age groups and age-group intervals, for females and males, and for mortality and incidence for Arab countries, the world, USA and Europe. This data was used to generate the pivot table in Table S2 which can be queried. All data in the manuscript was based on this data file.

  6. D

    Lung Cancer Diagnostic Tests Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To...

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Jan 7, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2025). Lung Cancer Diagnostic Tests Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/global-lung-cancer-diagnostic-tests-market
    Explore at:
    pdf, pptx, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 7, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Lung Cancer Diagnostic Tests Market Outlook



    The lung cancer diagnostic tests market size was valued at USD 2.5 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 6.1 billion by 2032, growing at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 10.5% during the forecast period. This substantial growth can be attributed to the rising prevalence of lung cancer globally, advancements in diagnostic technologies, and increasing awareness regarding early detection and treatment of lung cancer. The growing aging population and the high incidence of smoking, which is a leading cause of lung cancer, further propel the demand for diagnostic tests.



    The increasing prevalence of lung cancer is one of the primary drivers of market growth. Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, necessitating the development of more accurate and early diagnostic methods. With advancements in medical technology, such as molecular diagnostics and non-invasive imaging techniques, the accuracy and efficiency of lung cancer diagnosis have significantly improved. These innovations not only enhance the detection rate but also facilitate personalized treatment plans, thereby improving patient outcomes.



    Furthermore, government initiatives and funding for cancer research play a crucial role in market expansion. Many countries are investing heavily in cancer research, leading to the development of new diagnostic tools and techniques. For instance, organizations such as the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in the United States provide substantial grants for lung cancer research, fostering innovations in diagnostics. In addition, public awareness campaigns and screening programs conducted by healthcare organizations and governments encourage early diagnosis, which is vital for successful treatment and survival rates.



    The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in diagnostic tools is another significant factor contributing to market growth. AI algorithms can analyze medical images with high precision, aiding radiologists in identifying lung cancer at earlier stages. Moreover, AI-driven software can evaluate large datasets from genetic and molecular tests, providing insights into the most effective treatment options based on individual patient profiles. This technological advancement not only enhances the accuracy of diagnostics but also reduces the time required for analysis, thereby increasing the efficiency of healthcare services.



    The EGFR Mutation Test is a pivotal advancement in the realm of lung cancer diagnostics, offering a more personalized approach to treatment. This test specifically identifies mutations in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) gene, which are often present in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. By detecting these mutations, healthcare providers can tailor therapies that target the specific genetic alterations, thereby improving treatment efficacy and patient outcomes. The growing adoption of EGFR Mutation Tests underscores the shift towards precision medicine, where treatments are increasingly customized based on individual genetic profiles. This approach not only enhances the effectiveness of therapies but also minimizes adverse effects, as treatments are more accurately aligned with the patient's unique genetic makeup.



    Regionally, North America holds the largest share of the lung cancer diagnostic tests market, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. The dominance of North America can be attributed to the presence of advanced healthcare infrastructure, high healthcare expenditure, and a robust research landscape. The Asia Pacific region, however, is expected to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period, driven by increasing healthcare investments, growing awareness about lung cancer, and rising incidences of the disease in countries like China and India. The growing middle-class population and improving healthcare access in these countries further support market growth.



    Test Type Analysis



    The lung cancer diagnostic tests market is segmented by test type into imaging tests, sputum cytology, tissue biopsy, molecular tests, and others. Imaging tests are one of the most commonly used diagnostic methods for lung cancer detection. Techniques such as X-rays, CT scans, and PET scans provide detailed visuals of the lungs, helping in identifying abnormal growths or tumors. The non-invasive nature of these tests and their ability to provide quick results make them a preferred choice among healthcare

  7. f

    Differences in the Tumor Microenvironment between African-American and...

    • figshare.com
    pdf
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Damali N. Martin; Brenda J. Boersma; Ming Yi; Mark Reimers; Tiffany M. Howe; Harry G. Yfantis; Yien Che Tsai; Erica H. Williams; Dong H. Lee; Robert M. Stephens; Allan M. Weissman; Stefan Ambs (2023). Differences in the Tumor Microenvironment between African-American and European-American Breast Cancer Patients [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004531
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Damali N. Martin; Brenda J. Boersma; Ming Yi; Mark Reimers; Tiffany M. Howe; Harry G. Yfantis; Yien Che Tsai; Erica H. Williams; Dong H. Lee; Robert M. Stephens; Allan M. Weissman; Stefan Ambs
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    BackgroundAfrican-American breast cancer patients experience higher mortality rates than European-American patients despite having a lower incidence of the disease. We tested the hypothesis that intrinsic differences in the tumor biology may contribute to this cancer health disparity.Methods and ResultsUsing laser capture microdissection, we examined genome-wide mRNA expression specific to tumor epithelium and tumor stroma in 18 African-American and 17 European-American patients. Numerous genes were differentially expressed between these two patient groups and a two-gene signature in the tumor epithelium distinguished between them. To identify the biological processes in tumors that are different by race/ethnicity, Gene Ontology and disease association analyses were performed. Several biological processes were identified which may contribute to enhanced disease aggressiveness in African-American patients, including angiogenesis and chemotaxis. African-American tumors also contained a prominent interferon signature. The role of angiogenesis in the tumor biology of African-Americans was further investigated by examining the extent of vascularization and macrophage infiltration in an expanded set of 248 breast tumors. Immunohistochemistry revealed that microvessel density and macrophage infiltration is higher in tumors of African-Americans than in tumors of European-Americans. Lastly, using an in silico approach, we explored the potential of tailored treatment options for African-American patients based on their gene expression profile. This exploratory approach generated lists of therapeutics that may have specific antagonistic activity against tumors of African-American patients, e.g., sirolimus, resveratrol, and chlorpromazine in estrogen receptor-negative tumors.ConclusionsThe gene expression profiles of breast tumors indicate that differences in tumor biology may exist between African-American and European-American patients beyond the knowledge of current markers. Notably, pathways related to tumor angiogenesis and chemotaxis could be functionally different in these two patient groups.

  8. o

    Data from: Differential Gene Expression between African American and...

    • omicsdi.org
    xml
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Felix Araujo-Perez, Differential Gene Expression between African American and European American Colorectal Cancer Patients [Dataset]. https://www.omicsdi.org/dataset/geo/GSE28000
    Explore at:
    xmlAvailable download formats
    Authors
    Felix Araujo-Perez
    Variables measured
    Genomics
    Description

    The incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC) is higher in African Americans (AAs) than in other ethnic groups in the U. S., but reasons for the disparities are unknown. We performed gene expression profiling and microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis of sporadic CRCs from AAs vs. European Americans (EAs) to assess the contribution to CRC disparities. We evaluated gene expression of 43 AA and 43 EA CRC tumors matched by stage and 40 normal colon tissues using the Agilent human whole genome 4x44K cDNA arrays. Gene and pathway analysis were performed using Significance Analysis of Microarrays (SAM), 10-fold Cross Validation (10-fCV) and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). MSI analysis was assessed with five NIH Bethesda markers. SAM revealed that 95 genes were differentially expressed between AA and EA patients at a false discovery rate of <5%. A 10f-CV demonstrated that 9 genes were differentially expressed between AA and EA with an accuracy of 97%. Nine genes (CRYBB2, PSPH, ADAL, VSIG10L, C17orf81, ARSE, ANKRD36B, ZNF835, ARHGAP6) were validated and differential expression confirmed by qRT-PCR in independent test set of 21 patients (10 AA, 11 EA). We also analyzed MSI in 57 of the CRC subjects. Overall, 15.8% of CRC patients had MSI, with a higher rate observed in EA (20%) than in AA (12%). MSI distribution by tumor site was 77% right and 23% left colon. Previously, genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors have been implicated in the etiology of CRC. Our results are the first to implicate differential gene expression in CRC disparities and support the existence of distinct tumor microenvironments in these two patients' populations. Overall design: 126 total samples: 1) 43 white cancer samples; 2) 43 black cancer samples; 3) 27 white control samples; 4) 13 black control samples.

  9. Melanoma Tumor Size Prediction MachineHack

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Aug 7, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    V.Prasanna Kumar (2020). Melanoma Tumor Size Prediction MachineHack [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/vpkprasanna/melanoma-tumor-size-prediction-machinehack/versions/1
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Aug 7, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Kaggle
    Authors
    V.Prasanna Kumar
    Description

    Context

    There's a story behind every dataset and here's your opportunity to share yours.

    Content

    What's inside is more than just rows and columns. Make it easy for others to get started by describing how you acquired the data and what time period it represents, too. Welcome to our regular closed dataset based weekend hackathon. In this weekend hackathon, we are challenging all the machinehackers to predict the melanoma tumor size based on various attributes. Melanomas present in many different shapes, sizes, and colors. That’s why it’s tricky to provide a comprehensive set of warning signs. Melanoma, also known as malignant melanoma, is a type of skin cancer that develops from the pigment-producing cells known as melanocytes. The primary cause of melanoma is ultraviolet light (UV) exposure in those with low levels of the skin pigment melanin. The UV light may be from the sun or other sources, such as tanning devices.

    Melanoma is the most dangerous type of skin cancer. Globally, in 2012, it newly occurred in 232,000 people. In 2015, there were 3.1 million people with active disease, which resulted in 59,800 deaths. Australia and New Zealand have the highest rates of melanoma in the world. There are also high rates in Northern Europe and North America, while it is less common in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. In the United States melanoma occurs about 1.6 times more often in men than women.

    Data Description:

    Train.csv - 9146 rows x 9 columns
    Test.csv - 36584 rows x 8 columns
    Sample Submission - Acceptable submission format 
    

    Attributes Description:

    mass_npea: the mass of the area understudy for melanoma tumor
    size_npear: the size of the area understudy for melanoma tumor
    malign_ratio: ration of normal to malign surface understudy
    damage_size: unrecoverable area of skin damaged by the tumor
    exposed_area: total area exposed to the tumor
    std_dev_malign: standard deviation of malign skin measurements
    err_malign: error in malign skin measurements
    malign_penalty: penalty applied due to measurement error in the lab
    damage_ratio: the ratio of damage to total spread on the skin
    tumor_size: size of melanoma_tumor
    

    Acknowledgements

    We wouldn't be here without the help of others. If you owe any attributions or thanks, include them here along with any citations of past research.

    Inspiration

    Your data will be in front of the world's largest data science community. What questions do you want to see answered?

  10. OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY (OCT) IMAGE DATASET OF RADIATION DERMATITIS

    • zenodo.org
    bin, txt, zip
    Updated Dec 18, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Christos Photiou; Christos Photiou; Constantina Cloconi; Iosif Strouthos; Constantina Cloconi; Iosif Strouthos (2024). OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY (OCT) IMAGE DATASET OF RADIATION DERMATITIS [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8238140
    Explore at:
    bin, txt, zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 18, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Christos Photiou; Christos Photiou; Constantina Cloconi; Iosif Strouthos; Constantina Cloconi; Iosif Strouthos
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Image dataset of radiation dermatitis

    Citing the Dataset

    The dataset is released under a Creative Commons Attribution license, so please cite the dataset if it is used in your work in any form. Published academic papers should use the academic paper citation for our paper. Personal works, such as projects or blog posts, should provide a URL to this Zenodo page, though a reference to our paper would also be appreciated.

    Academic paper citation

    Photiou C., Cloconi C. & Strouthos I. Feature-Based vs. Deep-Learning Fusion Methods for the In Vivo Detection of Radiation Dermatitis Using Optical Coherence Tomography, a Feasibility Study. J Digit Imaging. Inform. med. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01241-4

    Personal use citation

    Include a link to this Zenodo page - 10.5281/zenodo.8238140

    ACKNOWLEDGMENT

    This research is funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 739551 (KIOS CoE) and from the Republic of Cyprus through the Directorate General for European Programs, Coordination and Development.

    Contact Information

    If you would like further information about the dataset, or if you experience any issues downloading files, please contact us at photiou.christos@ucy.ac.cy.

    Dataset Description

    This dataset consists of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) images from 22 head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Specifically, this dataset includes OCT images of five stages of Acute Radiation Dermatitis (ARD), labelled by an expert oncologist as Grade 0 (0), Grade 1 (1), Grade 2a (2), Grade 2b (3) and Grade 3 (4). Twenty-two head and neck cancer patients who were scheduled to receive radiation therapy at the German Oncology Center (GOC) in Limassol, Cyprus, participated in this proof-of-concept trial. The trial has received bioethics approval from the Cyprus National Bioethics Committee (Cyprus National Bioethics Committee 2020/61) and informed consent was collected. Patients under the age of 18 or with disabilities, expectant women, those who had recently undergone radiation therapy in the same area, and patients with autoimmune diseases were excluded from the study. After informed consent, the irradiated side of the neck of the subjects, was imaged with OCT. The imaging was performed with a swept-source OCT system (Santec IVS300), with a center wavelength of 1300 nm, an axial resolution of 12 micrometers in tissue, and an A-scan rate of 40 kHz. Six images were acquired at 1 cm intervals, covering the region from the mandibular angle to the clavicle. Imaging was repeated prior to every radiation therapy session, twice per week, until the conclusion of the therapy, resulting in a dataset of 1487 images. During each visit, the patient's ARD grade, at each of the imaging sites, was determined and recorded by a senior oncologist.

    Dataset
    The data consists of two items: (1) the excel file 'Description.xlsx' with the patient information and (2) the zip file 'Dataset.zip' containing the images, as described below.

    1) Description.xlsx
    This excel file contains patient information such as age, habits, etc, in the sheet 'Patient_Info'. The sheet 'Image_Info' contains the information for each image, such as the patient number (1-22), week number, visit number (usually one or two visits per week), image number (six images per visit with some exceptions), and classification (0-4).

    2) Dataset.zip
    This zip file contains the OCT images. Each patient's folder has sub-folders corresponding to each week, within which there are sub-folders corresponding to each visit, which contain the image folders. Each image folder contains two excel files: OCT Data (demodulated and logarithmic intensity image) and Raw Data (resampled interferometric data).

  11. D

    Pancreatic Cancer Diagnostic Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To...

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Jan 7, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2025). Pancreatic Cancer Diagnostic Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/global-pancreatic-cancer-diagnostic-market
    Explore at:
    pdf, csv, pptxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 7, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Pancreatic Cancer Diagnostic Market Outlook



    The global pancreatic cancer diagnostic market size was valued at approximately $3.2 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around $6.5 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.2%. This significant growth can be attributed to advancements in diagnostic technology, an increasing prevalence of pancreatic cancer, and a growing emphasis on early detection to improve survival rates.



    One of the primary growth factors driving the pancreatic cancer diagnostic market is the rising incidence of pancreatic cancer worldwide. Pancreatic cancer is considered one of the most lethal forms of cancer, with a five-year survival rate of less than 10%. The increasing awareness among people and medical practitioners about the importance of early diagnosis has propelled the demand for advanced diagnostic tools. Additionally, the rise in the aging population, which is more prone to such types of cancers, further accentuates the need for effective diagnostic solutions.



    Another significant driver is the technological advancements in diagnostic methods. The introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS), liquid biopsy, and other innovative diagnostic technologies has revolutionized the way pancreatic cancer is detected and monitored. These advanced methodologies not only enhance the accuracy of diagnosis but also enable personalized treatment plans, improving patient outcomes. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in diagnostic tools has also contributed to the growth of this market by enabling faster and more accurate interpretation of diagnostic data.



    Moreover, increased funding and investment in cancer research are also propelling the market. Governments and private organizations worldwide are investing heavily in cancer diagnostics and treatment research. This influx of funds has led to the development of new diagnostic techniques and the improvement of existing ones. Additionally, collaborations between pharmaceutical companies, research institutes, and diagnostic centers are fostering innovation and driving market growth. Initiatives like the Cancer Moonshot program in the United States are exemplary of how concerted efforts can accelerate advancements in cancer diagnostics.



    The landscape of pancreatic cancer treatment is evolving with the development of new pancreatic cancer drugs. These drugs are designed to target specific pathways involved in the growth and spread of cancer cells, offering hope for improved treatment outcomes. Recent advancements in drug research have led to the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapies, which are showing promising results in clinical trials. These innovative drugs aim to enhance the effectiveness of existing treatments, reduce side effects, and improve the quality of life for patients. The growing understanding of the molecular biology of pancreatic cancer is driving the development of these targeted therapies, which are expected to play a crucial role in the future of cancer treatment.



    In terms of regional outlook, North America holds the largest share of the pancreatic cancer diagnostic market, followed by Europe. The high prevalence of pancreatic cancer, well-established healthcare infrastructure, and significant investment in research and development are key factors driving the market in these regions. Asia Pacific is expected to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period, attributed to the increasing healthcare expenditure, rising awareness about early cancer detection, and the growing burden of cancer in the region. Emerging economies like China and India are particularly noteworthy, as they are investing heavily in healthcare infrastructure and cancer research.



    Diagnostic Method Analysis



    The pancreatic cancer diagnostic market is segmented by diagnostic methods into imaging tests, biopsy, blood tests, endoscopic ultrasound, and others. Among these, imaging tests are one of the most commonly used diagnostic methods. Imaging tests like CT scans, MRI, and PET scans provide detailed images of the pancreas and surrounding tissues, helping in the detection of tumors. The technological advancements in imaging techniques, such as 3D imaging and enhanced resolution, have significantly improved the accuracy and reliability of these tests.



    Biopsy is another crucial diagnostic method in the pancreatic cancer diagnostic market. It involves the remov

  12. Machine Hack: Melanoma Tumor Size Prediction

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Aug 8, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Anmol Kumar (2020). Machine Hack: Melanoma Tumor Size Prediction [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/anmolkumar/machine-hack-melanoma-tumor-size-prediction/code
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Aug 8, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
    Authors
    Anmol Kumar
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    Context

    Welcome to our regular closed dataset based weekend hackathon. In this weekend hackathon, we are challenging all the machinehackers to predict the melanoma tumor size based on various attributes. Melanomas present in many different shapes, sizes, and colors. That’s why it’s tricky to provide a comprehensive set of warning signs. Melanoma, also known as malignant melanoma, is a type of skin cancer that develops from the pigment-producing cells known as melanocytes. The primary cause of melanoma is ultraviolet light (UV) exposure in those with low levels of the skin pigment melanin. The UV light may be from the sun or other sources, such as tanning devices.

    Melanoma is the most dangerous type of skin cancer. Globally, in 2012, it newly occurred in 232,000 people. In 2015, there were 3.1 million people with active disease, which resulted in 59,800 deaths. Australia and New Zealand have the highest rates of melanoma in the world. There are also high rates in Northern Europe and North America, while it is less common in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. In the United States melanoma occurs about 1.6 times more often in men than women.

    Content

    Train.csv - 9146 rows x 9 columns Test.csv - 36584 rows x 8 columns Sample Submission - Acceptable submission format

    Attributes

    AttributesDescription
    mass_npeathe mass of the area understudy for melanoma tumor
    size_npearthe size of the area understudy for melanoma tumor
    malign_ratioration of normal to malign surface understudy
    damage_sizeunrecoverable area of skin damaged by the tumor
    exposed_areatotal area exposed to the tumor
    std_dev_malignstandard deviation of malign skin measurements
    err_malignerror in malign skin measurements
    malign_penaltypenalty applied due to measurement error in the lab
    damage_ratiothe ratio of damage to total spread on the skin
    tumor_sizesize of melanoma_tumor

    Acknowledgements

    Machine Hack: Melanoma Tumor Size Prediction

  13. o

    Deep single-cell RNA sequencing data for 12346 T cells from tumour, adjacent...

    • explore.openaire.eu
    Updated Jul 1, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2018). Deep single-cell RNA sequencing data for 12346 T cells from tumour, adjacent normal tissue and peripheral blood of treatment-naive NSCLC patients [Dataset]. https://explore.openaire.eu/search/dataset?datasetId=_OmicsDI::7e1800c63054da248cb02c9124e7931d
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 1, 2018
    Description

    Cancer immunotherapies have shown sustained clinical responses in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but efficacy varies between patients and is believed to depend in part on the amount and properties of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). To comprehensively depict and dissect the baseline landscape of the composition, lineage and functional states of TILs in lung cancer, here we generated deep single-cell RNA sequencing data for 12,346 T cells from the primary tumour, adjacent normal tissues and peripheral blood of 14 treatment-naive NSCLC patients. Combined expression and TCR-based lineage tracking revealed a significant proportion of effector T cells with common origins and similar functional states across peripheral blood and tumours pointing towards a highly migratory nature of these T cells. We also observed tumour-infiltrating CD8+ T cells undergoing extensive clonal expansion and exhaustion, with two clusters of cells exhibiting states preceding exhaustion. Survival analysis on independent datasets suggested that high ratio of pre-exhausted to exhausted T cells is associated with better prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). In addition, we observed further heterogeneity within the tumour regulatory T cells (Tregs), characterized by the bimodal distribution of TNFRSF9, an activation marker for antigen-specific Tregs. The gene signature of this group of activated tumour Tregs, which included IL1R2, correlated with poor prognosis in LUAD. The T cell clusters revealed by our single cell analyses provide a new approach for patient stratification, and the accompanying compendium of data will help the research community to gain further insight into the functional states and dynamics of T cell responses in lung cancer.

  14. DICOM converted Slide Microscopy images for the TCGA-TGCT collection

    • zenodo.org
    bin
    Updated Aug 20, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    David Clunie; David Clunie; William Clifford; David Pot; Ulrike Wagner; Keyvan Farahani; Erika Kim; Andrey Fedorov; Andrey Fedorov; William Clifford; David Pot; Ulrike Wagner; Keyvan Farahani; Erika Kim (2024). DICOM converted Slide Microscopy images for the TCGA-TGCT collection [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13346196
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 20, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    David Clunie; David Clunie; William Clifford; David Pot; Ulrike Wagner; Keyvan Farahani; Erika Kim; Andrey Fedorov; Andrey Fedorov; William Clifford; David Pot; Ulrike Wagner; Keyvan Farahani; Erika Kim
    License

    Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset corresponds to a collection of images and/or image-derived data available from National Cancer Institute Imaging Data Commons (IDC) [1]. This dataset was converted into DICOM representation and ingested by the IDC team. You can explore and visualize the corresponding images using IDC Portal here: TCGA-TGCT. You can use the manifests included in this Zenodo record to download the content of the collection following the Download instructions below.

    Collection description

    More than 90% of testicular cancer start in the germ cells, which are cells in the testicles and develop into sperm. This type of cancer is known as testicular germ cell cancer. Testicular germ cell cancer can be classified as either seminomas or nonseminomas, which may be identified by microscopy. Nonseminomas typically grow and spread more quickly than seminomas. A testicular germ cell tumor that contains a mix of both these subtypes is classified as a nonseminoma. TCGA studied both seminomas and nonseminomas.

    Testicular germ cell cancer is rare, comprising 1-2% of all tumors in males. However, it is the most common cancer in men ages 15 to 35. The incidence of testicular germ cell cancer has been continuously rising in many countries, including Europe and the U.S. In 2013, about 8,000 American men were estimated to be diagnosed with the cancer. Of those, 370 are predicted to die from the disease. Men who are Caucasian, have an undescended testicle, abnormally developed testicles, or a family history of testicular cancer have a greater risk of developing testicular cancer. Fortunately, testicular germ cell cancer is highly treatable.

    Please see the TCGA-TGCT information page to learn more about the images and to obtain any supporting metadata for this collection.

    Citation guidelines can be found on the Citing TCGA in Publications and Presentations information page.

    Files included

    A manifest file's name indicates the IDC data release in which a version of collection data was first introduced. For example, collection_id-idc_v8-aws.s5cmd corresponds to the contents of the collection_id collection introduced in IDC data release v8. If there is a subsequent version of this Zenodo page, it will indicate when a subsequent version of the corresponding collection was introduced.

    1. tcga_tgct-idc_v10-aws.s5cmd: manifest of files available for download from public IDC Amazon Web Services buckets
    2. tcga_tgct-idc_v10-gcs.s5cmd: manifest of files available for download from public IDC Google Cloud Storage buckets
    3. tcga_tgct-idc_v10-dcf.dcf: Gen3 manifest (for details see https://learn.canceridc.dev/data/organization-of-data/guids-and-uuids)

    Note that manifest files that end in -aws.s5cmd reference files stored in Amazon Web Services (AWS) buckets, while -gcs.s5cmd reference files in Google Cloud Storage. The actual files are identical and are mirrored between AWS and GCP.

    Download instructions

    Each of the manifests include instructions in the header on how to download the included files.

    To download the files using .s5cmd manifests:

    1. install idc-index package: pip install --upgrade idc-index
    2. download the files referenced by manifests included in this dataset by passing the .s5cmd manifest file: idc download manifest.s5cmd.

    To download the files using .dcf manifest, see manifest header.

    Acknowledgments

    Imaging Data Commons team has been funded in whole or in part with Federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under Task Order No. HHSN26110071 under Contract No. HHSN261201500003l.

    References

    [1] Fedorov, A., Longabaugh, W. J. R., Pot, D., Clunie, D. A., Pieper, S. D., Gibbs, D. L., Bridge, C., Herrmann, M. D., Homeyer, A., Lewis, R., Aerts, H. J. W., Krishnaswamy, D., Thiriveedhi, V. K., Ciausu, C., Schacherer, D. P., Bontempi, D., Pihl, T., Wagner, U., Farahani, K., Kim, E. & Kikinis, R. National Cancer Institute Imaging Data Commons: Toward Transparency, Reproducibility, and Scalability in Imaging Artificial Intelligence. RadioGraphics (2023). https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.230180

  15. AI Oncology Clinical Decision Support Market Research Report 2033

    • growthmarketreports.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Jul 5, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Growth Market Reports (2025). AI Oncology Clinical Decision Support Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://growthmarketreports.com/report/ai-oncology-clinical-decision-support-market
    Explore at:
    pdf, pptx, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 5, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Growth Market Reports
    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    AI Oncology Clinical Decision Support Market Outlook




    According to the latest research, the AI Oncology Clinical Decision Support market size reached USD 1.94 billion in 2024 globally, reflecting a robust growth trajectory. The market is projected to expand at a CAGR of 23.7% from 2025 to 2033, with the forecasted market size expected to reach USD 15.24 billion by 2033. The primary growth factor driving this surge is the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in oncology, which is revolutionizing cancer diagnosis, treatment planning, and patient management by delivering improved accuracy and efficiency in clinical decision-making.




    A significant growth factor for the AI Oncology Clinical Decision Support market is the rising incidence of cancer worldwide. With cancer being one of the leading causes of mortality, healthcare systems are under immense pressure to provide timely and accurate diagnostics and treatment plans. AI-powered clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are increasingly being integrated into oncology workflows to assist clinicians in interpreting complex datasets, including medical imaging, genomics, and patient records. These systems enable oncologists to make more informed decisions, minimize diagnostic errors, and personalize treatment strategies. The proliferation of electronic health records (EHRs) and the digitization of healthcare data further facilitate the adoption of AI-driven solutions, as these systems require vast datasets to deliver optimal insights. As a result, hospitals and cancer care centers are investing heavily in AI oncology CDSS to enhance patient outcomes and streamline clinical processes.




    Another crucial driver is the rapid advancement in machine learning algorithms and deep learning technologies tailored for oncology applications. Recent breakthroughs in natural language processing (NLP), image recognition, and predictive analytics have significantly improved the accuracy and reliability of AI oncology CDSS. These technologies can analyze unstructured data from pathology reports, radiology images, and genomic sequences, providing clinicians with actionable recommendations. Furthermore, the integration of AI with cloud computing has made these systems more accessible and scalable, allowing healthcare providers of all sizes to benefit from advanced decision support tools. The continuous evolution of AI models, fueled by collaborations between technology companies, research institutions, and healthcare providers, ensures that oncology CDSS solutions remain at the cutting edge of innovation, driving further market growth.




    Government initiatives and regulatory support are also playing a pivotal role in the expansion of the AI Oncology Clinical Decision Support market. Policymakers in major regions such as North America and Europe are promoting the adoption of AI in healthcare to improve clinical outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. Regulatory bodies are providing guidelines for the safe and effective deployment of AI-driven CDSS, fostering trust among healthcare professionals and patients. In addition, funding for oncology research and AI development is on the rise, enabling startups and established companies to develop and commercialize innovative solutions. These supportive measures, combined with growing awareness about the benefits of AI in oncology, are accelerating market adoption across diverse healthcare settings.




    From a regional perspective, North America currently dominates the AI Oncology Clinical Decision Support market, accounting for the largest share in 2024, driven by a well-established healthcare infrastructure, high adoption of advanced technologies, and favorable regulatory frameworks. Europe follows closely, with significant investments in digital health and AI research. The Asia Pacific region is emerging as a high-growth market, propelled by increasing healthcare expenditure, rising cancer prevalence, and government initiatives to modernize healthcare systems. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa, while still in nascent stages, are expected to witness accelerated growth over the forecast period as awareness and access to AI oncology solutions improve. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of global technology giants and specialized healthcare AI vendors, all striving to capture a share of this rapidly expanding market.



  16. f

    Table 6_Global trends in esophageal cancer: sex and age disparities in...

    • figshare.com
    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Jun 24, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ying Liu; Erman Wu; Fang Cheng; Meng Zhang; Qian Rou; Zenati Nuertai; Maorong Xu; Shanshan Xu; Minghui Li; Lei Zhang; Aheli Nasiroula (2025). Table 6_Global trends in esophageal cancer: sex and age disparities in health inequalities from 1990 to 2021, with projections to 2050.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1563570.s008
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 24, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Ying Liu; Erman Wu; Fang Cheng; Meng Zhang; Qian Rou; Zenati Nuertai; Maorong Xu; Shanshan Xu; Minghui Li; Lei Zhang; Aheli Nasiroula
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    BackgroundEsophageal cancer remains one of the deadliest cancers globally, highlighting significant health challenges and socioeconomic disparities. This study aims to measure its global burden, assess disparities by sex, age, and region, and evaluate health inequalities, with projections to 2050. The goal is to provide evidence to guide resource allocation and reduce the disease burden.MethodsUsing data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2021 study, we analyzed trends in prevalence, incidence, mortality, and Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) across sexes, age groups, and 204 countries and territories. Age-standardized rates (ASR) were calculated to account for population age structures. Trends over time were assessed using the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC). Health inequalities were evaluated using the Slope Index of Inequality (SII) and Concentration Index (CI). Future burdens were projected using Bayesian Age-Period-Cohort (BAPC) models.ResultsFrom 1990 to 2021, esophageal cancer cases increased: prevalence from 551.62 to 1004.2 thousand, incidence from 354.73 to 576.53 thousand, mortality from 356.26 to 538.6 thousand, and DALYs from 9753.57 to 12999.26 thousand. However, age-standardized rates declined: prevalence from 13.34 to 11.47, incidence from 8.86 to 6.65, mortality from 9.02 to 6.25, and DALYs from 235.32 to 148.56 per 100,000 people. The burden rises sharply after age 40, with males and low-SDI regions experiencing higher burdens. Health inequalities widened, with the SII for prevalence increasing from 2.52 to 5.67, and for deaths from 1.45 to 2.94. West Africa, North Europe, and North America saw rising prevalence rates, while East Asia showed a declining trend. A decreasing trend is observed in most countries and regions worldwide, particularly in East Asia, with projections suggesting a continued decline in the future.ConclusionAlthough projections indicate a decreasing trend, health inequalities have intensified. Regions such as West Africa, North Europe, and North America are experiencing rising prevalence. To address these disparities, targeted interventions, enhanced healthcare access, and preventive measures in high-burden areas are essential to reduce the global burden and advance health equity.

  17. f

    Descriptive statistics by prostate cancer aggressiveness and race.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 30, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Susan E. Steck; Lenore Arab; Hongmei Zhang; Jeannette T. Bensen; Elizabeth T. H. Fontham; Candace S. Johnson; James L. Mohler; Gary J. Smith; Joseph L. Su; Donald L. Trump; Anna Woloszynska-Read (2023). Descriptive statistics by prostate cancer aggressiveness and race. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125151.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Susan E. Steck; Lenore Arab; Hongmei Zhang; Jeannette T. Bensen; Elizabeth T. H. Fontham; Candace S. Johnson; James L. Mohler; Gary J. Smith; Joseph L. Su; Donald L. Trump; Anna Woloszynska-Read
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Descriptive statistics by prostate cancer aggressiveness and race.

  18. f

    Additional file 5 of Race-specific coregulatory and transcriptomic profiles...

    • figshare.com
    • springernature.figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated Aug 18, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Swathi Ramakrishnan; Eduardo Cortes-Gomez; Sarah R. Athans; Kristopher M. Attwood; Spencer R. Rosario; Se Jin Kim; Donald E. Mager; Emily G. Isenhart; Qiang Hu; Jianmin Wang; Anna Woloszynska (2024). Additional file 5 of Race-specific coregulatory and transcriptomic profiles associated with DNA methylation and androgen receptor in prostate cancer [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26701369.v1
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 18, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Authors
    Swathi Ramakrishnan; Eduardo Cortes-Gomez; Sarah R. Athans; Kristopher M. Attwood; Spencer R. Rosario; Se Jin Kim; Donald E. Mager; Emily G. Isenhart; Qiang Hu; Jianmin Wang; Anna Woloszynska
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Additional File 5.

  19. Characteristics of the 25 papers included in the review.

    • plos.figshare.com
    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 14, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Benoit Conti; Audrey Bochaton; Hélène Charreire; Hélène Kitzis-Bonsang; Caroline Desprès; Sandrine Baffert; Charlotte Ngô (2023). Characteristics of the 25 papers included in the review. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271319.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 14, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Benoit Conti; Audrey Bochaton; Hélène Charreire; Hélène Kitzis-Bonsang; Caroline Desprès; Sandrine Baffert; Charlotte Ngô
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Characteristics of the 25 papers included in the review.

  20. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Elena Demuru; Silvia Rossi; Leonardo Ventura; Luigino Dal Maso; Stefano Guzzinati; Alexander Katalinic; Sebastien Lamy; Valerie Jooste; Corrado Di Benedetto; Roberta De Angelis; the EUROCARE-6 Working Group (2023). DataSheet_1_Estimating complete cancer prevalence in Europe: validity of alternative vs standard completeness indexes.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1114701.s001

DataSheet_1_Estimating complete cancer prevalence in Europe: validity of alternative vs standard completeness indexes.docx

Related Article
Explore at:
docxAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jun 9, 2023
Dataset provided by
Frontiers
Authors
Elena Demuru; Silvia Rossi; Leonardo Ventura; Luigino Dal Maso; Stefano Guzzinati; Alexander Katalinic; Sebastien Lamy; Valerie Jooste; Corrado Di Benedetto; Roberta De Angelis; the EUROCARE-6 Working Group
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Area covered
Europe
Description

IntroductionComparable indicators on complete cancer prevalence are increasingly needed in Europe to support survivorship care planning. Direct measures can be biased by limited registration time and estimates are needed to recover long term survivors. The completeness index method, based on incidence and survival modelling, is the standard most validated approach.MethodsWithin this framework, we consider two alternative approaches that do not require any direct modelling activity: i) empirical indices derived from long established European registries; ii) pre-calculated indices derived from US-SEER cancer registries. Relying on the EUROCARE-6 study dataset we compare standard vs alternative complete prevalence estimates using data from 62 registries in 27 countries by sex, cancer type and registration time.ResultsFor tumours mostly diagnosed in the elderly the empirical estimates differ little from standard estimates (on average less than 5% after 10-15 years of registration), especially for low prognosis cancers. For early-onset cancers (bone, brain, cervix uteri, testis, Hodgkin disease, soft tissues) the empirical method may produce substantial underestimations of complete prevalence (up to 20%) even when based on 35-year observations. SEER estimates are comparable to the standard ones for most cancers, including many early-onset tumours, even when derived from short time series (10-15 years). Longer observations are however needed when cancer-specific incidence and prognosis differ remarkably between US and European populations (endometrium, thyroid or stomach).DiscussionThese results may facilitate the dissemination of complete prevalence estimates across Europe and help bridge the current information gaps.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu