Facebook
TwitterThe Massachusetts Vehicle Census (MVC) is the first state-level dataset in the nation that joins vehicle-level odometer readings with vehicle attribute and registration transaction histories. This powerful resource allows policymakers, researchers, and other stakeholders understand state and local trends in vehicle usage and ownership.
Facebook
TwitterThese datasets provide vehicle counts broken down by ZIP code, model year, fuel type, make and duty (light/heavy) of registered vehicles with specific as of dates.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset contains the file of vehicle, snowmobile and boat registrations in NYS. Registrations expired more than 2 years are excluded. Records that have a scofflaw, revocation and/or suspension are included with indicators specifying those kinds of records.
Facebook
TwitterTotal vehicle registration counts per month by county
Facebook
TwitterThe individual motorist dataset contains data and analysis of consumer electric vehicle (EV) ownership trends in rural Appalachian Ohio in comparison with statewide trends. The data span four years, from Q1 2020 to Q2 2023 (partial). They are sourced from the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles registration records and contain detail on drivetrain type (battery-electric vehicle [BEV] or plug-in hybrid electric vehicle [PHEV]); specific vehicle make and model; and registration location at county, city, and ZIP code levels of spatial resolution. Registration data are analyzed at the county level against such indicators as median income, poverty status, urban-rural status, and density of public charging infrastructure. In addition to tabular data, a GIS shapefile with many analysis fields joined is included.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html
This research tests an implicit assumption on investment in plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) charging infrastructure: people who are not already interested in PEVs will see public PEV charging and become interested in PEVs. Data from a survey of car-owning households in California are combined with data on public PEV charging and PEV registrations to estimate a structural equation model of the extent to which participants have considered acquiring a battery electric vehicle (BEV) or plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV), and whether participants report seeing PEV charging. The model controls for socio-economic and demographic measures and participants’ awareness, knowledge, and assessments of PEVs, and the known correlation between PEV registrations and public charging locations. Using logistic ordinal regression we also assess whether charger density near workplaces affects the results. All results contradict the assumption that people will see charging infrastructure and that more charging—rather than more people seeing charging—means more people will consider purchasing a BEV or PHEV. Rather, prior interest and positive assessments of PEVs, allow people to see PEV charging. In short, interest in PEVs is a prerequisite to people seeing PEV charging. Methods We use data from car-owning households (all cars, not just PEVs) from a survey completed in 2021 by nearly 3,000 respondents across California. These data are supplemented by data on the contemporaneous (with the household survey) counts of charging locations and PEV registrations in survey participants’ home zip codes. The analysis also controls for density of PEVs in the participants’ home zip codes as there is geographic correlation between PEVs and PEV charging infrastructure. Further, the analysis includes whether participants see PEV charging. The survey instrument also measured consumer awareness, knowledge, assessments, and consideration of PEVs. The sample was recruited by a professional survey firm. Participants were recruited from panels of people maintained by such firms for the express purpose of participating in research. Participants are typically screened based on criteria relevant to each study to which they are invited. Firms providing this service typically reward participation based on how many studies a person completes and the time and effort required to do so. Because all recruiting was done by the vendor and because these firms typically maintain cooperative relationships with each other allowing them to recruit from each other’s panels, the number of initial invitations to the pre-screening questionnaire for this study is unknown. Thus, a traditional response rate cannot be calculated. What is known is the number of people who screened into this study’s questionnaire and how many completed it. The completion rate was in the low-70 percentages. Participants were screened into this study via a pre-questionnaire establishing eligibility, determined primarily by respondent age (for reasons of informed consent and for quota sampling), respondent sex, household vehicle ownership (for basic eligibility), household income, and residential zip code. Quotas for age, sex, and income were set to match regional distributions within California for car-owning households. The analysis here is for the state.
Facebook
TwitterCC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
We collect comprehensive data from multiple sources, including the Alabama Department of Revenue (ALDOR), American Community Survey (ACS), and POLK, all mapped with zipcode-level granularity to enable precise geospatial analysis. Our data organization strategy categorizes information by fuel types (focusing on BEVs compared to conventional vehicles), geographical units (zip codes as primary units), and different measurement types (including absolute counts, per capita values, and proportional measurements) to facilitate multi-dimensional analysis.
Facebook
TwitterData files containing detailed information about vehicles in the UK are also available, including make and model data.
Some tables have been withdrawn and replaced. The table index for this statistical series has been updated to provide a full map between the old and new numbering systems used in this page.
The Department for Transport is committed to continuously improving the quality and transparency of our outputs, in line with the Code of Practice for Statistics. In line with this, we have recently concluded a planned review of the processes and methodologies used in the production of Vehicle licensing statistics data. The review sought to seek out and introduce further improvements and efficiencies in the coding technologies we use to produce our data and as part of that, we have identified several historical errors across the published data tables affecting different historical periods. These errors are the result of mistakes in past production processes that we have now identified, corrected and taken steps to eliminate going forward.
Most of the revisions to our published figures are small, typically changing values by less than 1% to 3%. The key revisions are:
Licensed Vehicles (2014 Q3 to 2016 Q3)
We found that some unlicensed vehicles during this period were mistakenly counted as licensed. This caused a slight overstatement, about 0.54% on average, in the number of licensed vehicles during this period.
3.5 - 4.25 tonnes Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEVs) Classification
Since 2023, ZEVs weighing between 3.5 and 4.25 tonnes have been classified as light goods vehicles (LGVs) instead of heavy goods vehicles (HGVs). We have now applied this change to earlier data and corrected an error in table VEH0150. As a result, the number of newly registered HGVs has been reduced by:
3.1% in 2024
2.3% in 2023
1.4% in 2022
Table VEH0156 (2018 to 2023)
Table VEH0156, which reports average CO₂ emissions for newly registered vehicles, has been updated for the years 2018 to 2023. Most changes are minor (under 3%), but the e-NEDC measure saw a larger correction, up to 15.8%, due to a calculation error. Other measures (WLTP and Reported) were less notable, except for April 2020 when COVID-19 led to very few new registrations which led to greater volatility in the resultant percentages.
Neither these specific revisions, nor any of the others introduced, have had a material impact on the statistics overall, the direction of trends nor the key messages that they previously conveyed.
Specific details of each revision made has been included in the relevant data table notes to ensure transparency and clarity. Users are advised to review these notes as part of their regular use of the data to ensure their analysis accounts for these changes accordingly.
If you have questions regarding any of these changes, please contact the Vehicle statistics team.
Overview
VEH0101: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/68ecf5acf159f887526bbd7c/veh0101.ods">Vehicles at the end of the quarter by licence status and body type: Great Britain and United Kingdom (ODS, 99.7 KB)
Detailed breakdowns
VEH0103: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/68ecf5abf159f887526bbd7b/veh0103.ods">Licensed vehicles at the end of the year by tax class: Great Britain and United Kingdom (ODS, 23.8 KB)
VEH0105: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/68ecf5ac2adc28a81b4acfc8/veh0105.ods">Licensed vehicles at
Facebook
TwitterData licence Germany – Attribution – Version 2.0https://www.govdata.de/dl-de/by-2-0
License information was derived automatically
The evaluation is based on the reports submitted by the registration authorities to the Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) on new registrations, decommissioning and transfer of ownership of motor vehicles and their trailers in Germany. The data are registered in the Central Vehicle Register (ZFZR) in the Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) and evaluated here according to selected characteristics, such as vehicle classes, registration district and holder groups. In the case of a regional structure, the place of residence of the holder or the registered office, the branch or the service is decisive. The postal code (postcode) is not used as an evaluation feature, it only serves to supplement the place name. For municipalities with more than one postal code, only the lowest is indicated. Due to incorporations that have been implemented in the meantime, deviations from the currently valid postal code may arise in individual cases. Until 2006, the decommissionings were referred to as deletions. The reporting period is a calendar year.
Facebook
TwitterApache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
License information was derived automatically
This dataset contains the vehicle registration data for all vehicles in Spain registered from January 2015 to December 2024, sourced from the Dirección General de Tráfico (DGT). Original data is provided inside zips with `txt files in fixed-width format and has been converted to CSV for convenience.
Full documentation of the fields can be found at the official DGT PDF: MATRICULACIONES_MATRABA.pdf
| Column | Description |
|---|---|
FEC_MATRICULA | Registration date of the vehicle (YYYYMMDD). |
COD_CLASE_MAT | Vehicle registration class code. |
FEC_TRAMITACION | Date of processing the registration (YYYYMMDD). |
MARCA_ITV | Vehicle brand as recorded by ITV. |
MODELO_ITV | Vehicle model as recorded by ITV. |
COD_PROCEDENCIA_ITV | Code indicating the origin of the vehicle. |
BASTIDOR_ITV | Vehicle chassis number (VIN). |
COD_TIPO | Vehicle type code. |
COD_PROPULSION_ITV | Propulsion type. |
CILINDRADA_ITV | Engine displacement in cc. |
POTENCIA_ITV | Engine power in CVF (tax horsepower). |
TARA | Vehicle empty weight (kg). |
PESO_MAX | Maximum allowed weight (kg). |
NUM_PLAZAS | Number of seats. |
IND_PRECINTO | Indicator for sealed vehicle. |
IND_EMBARGO | Indicator if the vehicle is under embargo. |
NUM_TRANSMISIONES | Number of ownership transmissions. |
NUM_TITULARES | Number of registered owners. |
LOCALIDAD_VEHICULO | Vehicle location (city/town). |
COD_PROVINCIA_VEH | Province code of the vehicle location. |
COD_PROVINCIA_MAT | Province code where registration occurred. |
CLAVE_TRAMITE | Procedure key for registration type. |
FEC_TRAMITE | Date of registration procedure (YYYYMMDD). |
CODIGO_POSTAL | Postal code of vehicle location. |
FEC_PRIM_MATRICULACION | Date of first registration (YYYYMMDD). |
IND_NUEVO_USADO | Indicator if vehicle is new or used. |
PERSONA_FISICA_JURIDICA | Owner type: individual or legal entity. |
CODIGO_ITV | ITV code. |
SERVICIO | Service type. |
COD_MUNICIPIO_INE_VEH | Municipality code (INE standard). |
MUNICIPIO | Name of municipality. |
KW_ITV | Vehicle power in kW. |
NUM_PLAZAS_MAX | Maximum number of seats. |
CO2_ITV | CO₂ emissions (g/km). |
RENTING | Indicator for renting vehicles. |
COD_TUTELA | Indicator for vehicles owned by minors or with judicial protection. |
COD_POSESION | Code indicating type of ownership. |
IND_BAJA_DEF | Indicator if vehicle is permanently deregistered. |
IND_BAJA_TEMP | Indicator if vehicle is temporarily deregistered. |
IND_SUSTRACCION | Indicator if vehicle is stolen. |
BAJA_TELEMATICA | Telematic deregistration info. |
TIPO_ITV | Type of vehicle. |
VARIANTE_ITV | Variant code. |
VERSION_ITV | Version code. |
FABRICANTE_ITV | Vehicle manufacturer as recorded in ITV. |
MASA_ORDEN_MARCHA_ITV | Vehicle curb weight (kg). |
MASA_MAXIMA_TECNICA_ADMISIBLE_ITV | Maximum allowed technical weight (kg). |
CATEGORIA_HOMOLOGACION_EUROPEA_ITV | European homologation category. |
CARROCERIA | Car body type. |
PLAZAS_PIE | Standing places (for buses). |
NIVEL_EMISIONES_EURO_ITV | Euro emissions standard (Euro 5, 6, etc.). |
CONSUMO_WH_KM_ITV | Energy consumption (Wh/km). |
CLASIFICACION_REGLAMENTO_VEHICULOS_ITV | Regulation classification. |
CATEGORIA_VEHICULO_ELECTRICO | Electric vehicle category. |
AUTONOMIA_VEHICULO_ELECTRICO | Electric vehicle autonomy/range (km). |
MARCA_VEHICULO_BASE | Base brand of vehicle. |
FABRICANTE_VEHICULO_BASE | Base manufacturer of vehicle. |
TIPO_VEHICULO_BASE | Base vehicle type. |
VARIANTE_VEHICULO_BASE | Base vehicle variant. |
VERSION_VEHICULO_BASE | Base vehicle version. |
DISTANCIA_EJES_12_ITV | Distance between axles 1-2. |
VIA_ANTERIOR_ITV | Front track distance. |
VIA_POSTERIOR_ITV | Rear track distance. |
TIPO_ALIMENTACION_ITV | Fuel type. |
CONTRASENA_HOMOLOGACION_ITV | Homologation code. |
ECO_INNOVACION_ITV | Eco innovation indicator. |
REDUCCION_ECO_ITV | Eco reduction indicator. |
CODIGO_ECO_ITV | Eco code. |
FEC_PROCESO | Date of data processing (YYYYMMDD). |
Facebook
TwitterNovember 17, 2023
This comprehensive dataset provides detailed information on Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) and Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) currently registered through the Washington State Department of Licensing (DOL). It offers a thorough examination of electric vehicle ownership patterns and trends, including vehicle registration, make, model, electric vehicle type, clean alternative fuel vehicle (CAFV) eligibility, electric range, base MSRP, legislative district, DOL vehicle ID, vehicle location, electric utility, and 2020 Census tract.
Washington State Department of Licensing (DOL)
CSV
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The data includes the car ownership data of Helsinki Metropolitan Area for the years 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2017 and 2020. Years 2000-2017 include the data from Helsinki, Espoo and Kauniainen and the year 2020 includes the data from Helsinki, Espoo and Vantaa.
The produced dataset is based on the Finnish Environment Institute’s YKR data. The regional divisions of the calculated data vary depending on the city: in Helsinki, the division is based on districts and in Vantaa, Espoo and Kauniainen on the division of statistical areas. The dataset has been composed as follows: 1. Each municipality's squares (= centres of the squares) have been separated from the data for different years according to the municipality code. 2. Information about the area division has been attached to the centres of the squares based on location (partly manually on the edges of the areas). 3. Column data has been summed up based on the area division. 4. Tables have been cleaned up by deleting redundant data and fading out some data, such as “less than 10” (in Finnish "alle 10") cases, for privacy reasons.
The dataset includes the following attributes
Things to note about using the dataset: For privacy reasons, information is not available on all squares of the YKR dataset used as source data. The produced dataset is therefore not fully accurate.
Facebook
TwitterCC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, the decennial census is the official source of population totals for April 1st of each decennial year. In between censuses, the Census Bureau's Population Estimates Program produces and disseminates the official estimates of the population for the nation, states, counties, cities, and towns and estimates of housing units for states and counties..Information about the American Community Survey (ACS) can be found on the ACS website. Supporting documentation including code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing, and a full list of ACS tables and table shells (without estimates) can be found on the Technical Documentation section of the ACS website.Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Methodology section..Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2022 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates.Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see ACS Technical Documentation). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables..Workers include members of the Armed Forces and civilians who were at work last week..The 2022 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the March 2020 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) delineations of metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas. In certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables may differ from the OMB delineations due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities..Estimates of urban and rural populations, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on 2020 Census data. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarily reflect the results of ongoing urbanization..Explanation of Symbols:- The estimate could not be computed because there were an insufficient number of sample observations. For a ratio of medians estimate, one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or highest interval of an open-ended distribution. For a 5-year median estimate, the margin of error associated with a median was larger than the median itself.N The estimate or margin of error cannot be displayed because there were an insufficient number of sample cases in the selected geographic area. (X) The estimate or margin of error is not applicable or not available.median- The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution (for example "2,500-")median+ The median falls in the highest interval of an open-ended distribution (for example "250,000+").** The margin of error could not be computed because there were an insufficient number of sample observations.*** The margin of error could not be computed because the median falls in the lowest interval or highest interval of an open-ended distribution.***** A margin of error is not appropriate because the corresponding estimate is controlled to an independent population or housing estimate. Effectively, the corresponding estimate has no sampling error and the margin of error may be treated as zero.
Facebook
TwitterThis data set used in the CoIL 2000 Challenge contains information on customers of an insurance company. The data consists of 86 variables and includes product usage data and socio-demographic data derived from zip area codes. The data was collected to answer the following question: Can you predict who would be interested in buying a caravan insurance policy and give an explanation why?
DISCLAIMER
This dataset is owned and supplied by the Dutch datamining company Sentient Machine Research, and is based on real world business data. You are allowed to use this dataset and accompanying information for non commercial research and education purposes only. It is explicitly not allowed to use this dataset for commercial education or demonstration purposes. For any other use, please contact Peter van der Putten, info@smr.nl.
This dataset has been used in the CoIL Challenge 2000 datamining competition. For papers describing results on this dataset, see the TIC 2000 homepage: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~putten/library/cc2000/
Please cite/acknowledge:
P. van der Putten and M. van Someren (eds) . CoIL Challenge 2000: The Insurance Company Case. Published by Sentient Machine Research, Amsterdam. Also a Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science Technical Report 2000-09. June 22, 2000.
Originally, this dataset was broken into two parts: the training set and the evaluation set. As this was a competition, the responses to the evaluation set were not given as part of the original release; they were, however, released after the end of the competition in a separate file. This dataset contains all three of these files, combined into one.
The field ORIGIN in the caravan-insurance-challenge.csv file has the values train and test, corresponding to the training and evaluation sets, respectively. To simulate the original challenge, you can ignore the test rows, and test your model's prediction on those observations once you've trained only on the training set.
Each observation corresponds to a postal code. Variables beginning with M refer to demographic statistics of the postal code, while variables beginning with P and A (as well as CARAVAN, the target variable) refer to product ownership and insurance statistics in the postal code.
The data file contains the following fields:
** Percentages in each group, per postal code (see L3)**:
** Total number of variable in postal code (see L4)**:
Facebook
TwitterMIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
Dataset Description: This dataset contains information about electric vehicles (EVs) registered in various countries and cities. It includes data on vehicle identification numbers (VINs), countries, cities, states, postal codes, model years, makes, models, electric vehicle types, Clean Alternative Fuel Vehicle (CAFV) eligibility, electric ranges, base MSRPs, legislative districts, DOL vehicle IDs, vehicle locations, and electric utilities.
Dataset Attributes:
Dataset Potential Uses:
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
Facebook
TwitterThe Massachusetts Vehicle Census (MVC) is the first state-level dataset in the nation that joins vehicle-level odometer readings with vehicle attribute and registration transaction histories. This powerful resource allows policymakers, researchers, and other stakeholders understand state and local trends in vehicle usage and ownership.