18 datasets found
  1. UK adults on catfishing awareness and experiences 2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 8, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). UK adults on catfishing awareness and experiences 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1467264/uk-adults-catfishing-awareness-experiences/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 8, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    United Kingdom
    Description

    According to a survey conducted in the United Kingdom between 2022 and 2023, almost half of all adults had an increased awareness of catfiashing. Overall, ** percent had personally experienced catfishing, and ** percent knew someone who had been catfished. Additionally, one in *** respondents were aware of a catfishing victim who was aged under 18 years. Catfishing is a type of dating scam where people create fake identities on social media and dating sites.

  2. Catfishing: reported romance scams 2020, by country

    • statista.com
    Updated Dec 13, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2023). Catfishing: reported romance scams 2020, by country [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1322625/number-of-catfishing-incidents-worldwide-by-country/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 13, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2020
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    According to a global report conducted throughout 2020, there were 1,315 reported catfishing scams in the Philippines during the examined period. In Nigeria, there were 1,129 reported catfishing incidents in 2020, and 1,054 in Canada. The United Kingdom ranked fourth, followed by Turkey, and Ghana, respectively.

  3. U.S. catfishing scams reported losses 2017-2021

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). U.S. catfishing scams reported losses 2017-2021 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1362095/us-romance-scams-losses/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 9, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In 2021, reported losses from online romance scams in the United States reached *** million U.S. dollars. This is an increase of over *** percent compared to 2017 when ** million U.S. dollars in losses were recorded from catfishing scams. Catfishing is an online scam where victims are lured into a relationship by means of a fake online persona. On average, victims of catfishing face a loss of around *** thousand U.S. dollars. Over one in ten U.S. adults said they have definitely interacted with a catfish online.

  4. U.S. adults on potential catfish interaction 2022

    • statista.com
    Updated Feb 28, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2022). U.S. adults on potential catfish interaction 2022 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1291656/us-adults-catfishing-interaction/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 28, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jan 14, 2022 - Jan 15, 2022
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    As of January 2022, 13 percent of surveyed adults in the United States reported that they had definitely interacted with a catfish online, whilst 17 percent said that they had probably had this kind of encounter. However, 38 percent of respondents were sure that they had not interacted with an online impersonator.

  5. Key statistics on financial catfishing in the United States 2022

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Key statistics on financial catfishing in the United States 2022 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1366846/us-financial-catfishing/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 9, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2022
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In 2022, people in the United States lost over half a billion U.S. dollars combined from financial catfishing. There were around ****** reported victims, who have lost an average of almost ****** U.S. dollars.

  6. U.S. adults on social media company catfishing responsibilities 2022, by age...

    • statista.com
    Updated Mar 10, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2022). U.S. adults on social media company catfishing responsibilities 2022, by age group [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1295015/us-adults-social-media-companies-catfishing-responsibilities-by-age-group/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 10, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jan 14, 2022 - Jan 15, 2022
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    According to a January 2022 survey, 66 percent of 18 to 34 year old U.S. adults felt that social media companies should be doing more to identify and remove potential catfish from their platforms, whereas 18 percent in this age group felt that they were already doing enough to tackle the problem. Overall, 80 percent of respondents aged 65 and over thought that social media companies were not doing enough to address potential catfishing accounts.

  7. N

    North America Online Dating Services Market Report

    • marketreportanalytics.com
    doc, pdf, ppt
    Updated Apr 25, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Market Report Analytics (2025). North America Online Dating Services Market Report [Dataset]. https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/reports/north-america-online-dating-services-market-90171
    Explore at:
    doc, ppt, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 25, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Market Report Analytics
    License

    https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2033
    Area covered
    North America
    Variables measured
    Market Size
    Description

    The North American online dating services market, currently experiencing robust growth, is projected to expand significantly from 2025 to 2033. A 5.60% Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) suggests a substantial increase in market value over this period. This growth is fueled by several key drivers: the increasing prevalence of smartphone usage and mobile dating apps, a shift towards more casual relationships and flexible lifestyles, and the growing acceptance of online dating as a legitimate way to meet romantic partners. Furthermore, the market is segmented into two primary categories: non-paying and paying online dating services. While non-paying services provide a convenient entry point for users, the paying segment often offers premium features and a more refined user experience, contributing to overall market revenue. Competition within the market is intense, with established players like Match Group Inc. and Bumble vying for market share alongside niche players focusing on specific demographics (e.g., BlackPeopleMeet, EliteSingles). The North American market, specifically the United States and Canada, dominates the region due to higher internet penetration and a more established online dating culture. Continued innovation in matching algorithms, user experience enhancements, and safety features will be crucial for companies to maintain a competitive edge. This evolution also encompasses increasing efforts to combat scams and fraud within the sector, thereby enhancing user trust. The market's restraints include concerns about data privacy and security, the potential for catfishing and fraudulent profiles, and the evolving social dynamics surrounding online dating. Despite these challenges, the market's strong growth trajectory suggests that the benefits of online dating, including convenience, expanded reach, and a streamlined process, continue to outweigh the potential risks for a substantial portion of the population. The focus on enhancing user safety and trust, coupled with ongoing technological advancements, should help mitigate these concerns and sustain the market's growth momentum in the coming years. The integration of AI and machine learning in matchmaking algorithms is expected to further personalize the user experience and drive higher user engagement, contributing to increased revenue streams for both non-paying and paying segments. Recent developments include: March 2022 - Match Group has announced that it is launching the latest addition to its dating services lineup with Stir, an app designed exclusively for single parents. With the new release, the company aims to address the 20 million single parents in the U.S. who are under-served by existing dating apps.. Key drivers for this market are: Continuous Innovation in Service Offerings, Growing Penetration of Smartphones and Mobile Devices. Potential restraints include: Continuous Innovation in Service Offerings, Growing Penetration of Smartphones and Mobile Devices. Notable trends are: Rapid innovation in service offerings is driving the market growth.

  8. Data from: Crowds replicate performance of scientific experts scoring...

    • zenodo.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Jul 19, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Maureen A. O'Leary; Kenzley Alphonse; Arce H. Mariangeles; Dario Cavaliere; Andrea Cirranello; Thomas G. Dietterich; Mattew Julius; Seth Kaufman; Edith Law; Maria Passarotti; Abigail Reft; Javier Robalino; Nancy B. Simmons; Selena Y. Smith; Dennis W. Stevenson; Ed Theriot; Paúl M. Velazco; Ramona L. Walls; Mengjie Yu; Marymegan Daly; Maureen A. O'Leary; Kenzley Alphonse; Arce H. Mariangeles; Dario Cavaliere; Andrea Cirranello; Thomas G. Dietterich; Mattew Julius; Seth Kaufman; Edith Law; Maria Passarotti; Abigail Reft; Javier Robalino; Nancy B. Simmons; Selena Y. Smith; Dennis W. Stevenson; Ed Theriot; Paúl M. Velazco; Ramona L. Walls; Mengjie Yu; Marymegan Daly (2024). Data from: Crowds replicate performance of scientific experts scoring phylogenetic matrices of phenotypes [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.766cp
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 19, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Maureen A. O'Leary; Kenzley Alphonse; Arce H. Mariangeles; Dario Cavaliere; Andrea Cirranello; Thomas G. Dietterich; Mattew Julius; Seth Kaufman; Edith Law; Maria Passarotti; Abigail Reft; Javier Robalino; Nancy B. Simmons; Selena Y. Smith; Dennis W. Stevenson; Ed Theriot; Paúl M. Velazco; Ramona L. Walls; Mengjie Yu; Marymegan Daly; Maureen A. O'Leary; Kenzley Alphonse; Arce H. Mariangeles; Dario Cavaliere; Andrea Cirranello; Thomas G. Dietterich; Mattew Julius; Seth Kaufman; Edith Law; Maria Passarotti; Abigail Reft; Javier Robalino; Nancy B. Simmons; Selena Y. Smith; Dennis W. Stevenson; Ed Theriot; Paúl M. Velazco; Ramona L. Walls; Mengjie Yu; Marymegan Daly
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Scientists building the Tree of Life face an overwhelming challenge to categorize phenotypes (e.g., anatomy, physiology) from millions of living and fossil species. This biodiversity challenge far outstrips the capacities of trained scientific experts. Here we explore whether crowdsourcing can be used to collect matrix data on a large scale with the participation of the non-expert students, or "citizen scientists." Crowdsourcing, or data collection by non-experts, frequently via the internet, has enabled scientists to tackle some large-scale data collection challenges too massive for individuals or scientific teams alone. The quality of work by non-expert crowds is, however, often questioned and little data has been collected on how such crowds perform on complex tasks such as phylogenetic character coding. We studied a crowd of over 600 non-experts, and found that they could use images to identify anatomical similarity (hypotheses of homology) with an average accuracy of 82% compared to scores provided by experts in the field. This performance pattern held across the Tree of Life, from protists to vertebrates. We introduce a procedure that predicts the difficulty of each character and that can be used to assign harder characters to experts and easier characters to a non-expert crowd for scoring. We test this procedure in a controlled experiment comparing crowd scores to those of experts and show that crowds can produce matrices with over 90% of cells scored correctly while reducing the number of cells to be scored by experts by 50%. Preparation time, including image collection and processing, for a crowdsourcing experiment is significant, and does not currently save time of scientific experts overall. However, if innovations in automation or robotics can reduce such effort, then large-scale implementation of our method could greatly increase the collective scientific knowledge of species phenotypes for phylogenetic tree building. For the field of crowdsourcing, we provide a rare study with ground truth, or an experimental control that many studies lack, and contribute new methods on how to coordinate the work of experts and non-experts. We show that there are important instances in which crowd consensus is not a good proxy for correctness.

  9. Global import data of Catfish

    • volza.com
    csv
    Updated Jul 16, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Volza FZ LLC (2025). Global import data of Catfish [Dataset]. https://www.volza.com/p/catfish/import/import-in-india/
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 16, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Authors
    Volza FZ LLC
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Variables measured
    Count of importers, Sum of import value, 2014-01-01/2021-09-30, Count of import shipments
    Description

    403 Global import shipment records of Catfish with prices, volume & current Buyer's suppliers relationships based on actual Global export trade database.

  10. U.S. adults who have sent money to a catfish 2022, by gender

    • statista.com
    Updated Mar 7, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2022). U.S. adults who have sent money to a catfish 2022, by gender [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1293380/us-adults-sent-money-to-a-catfish-by-gender/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 7, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jan 14, 2022 - Jan 15, 2022
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    As of January 2022, eight percent of male and three percent of female U.S. internet users reported that they had definitely sent money to a catfish. Overall, ten percent of men and 12 percent of women said they had probably sent money to someone pretending to be someone else. The vast majority of respondents said they had never sent money to a catfish.

  11. Non-intensive fish farming systems location score: African Catfish and Nile...

    • data.amerigeoss.org
    jpeg, wmts, zip
    Updated Mar 19, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Food and Agriculture Organization (2024). Non-intensive fish farming systems location score: African Catfish and Nile Tilapia (Cameroon - ~1km) [Dataset]. https://data.amerigeoss.org/dataset/eca3bd24-9644-4a17-b4e2-d1f78d13e0f8
    Explore at:
    wmts, zip, jpeg(517067)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 19, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Food and Agriculture Organizationhttp://fao.org/
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Cameroon
    Description

    Raster representing potential/suitability score for non-intensive and integrated, small-scale, African Catfish and Nile Tilapia, freshwater fish farming systems, using ponds and small water bodies (SWB) in Cameroun. Produced under the scope of FAO’s Hand-in-Hand Initiative, Geographical Information Systems - Multicriteria Decision Analysis for value chain infrastructure locationand the Projet de Développment des Châinnes de Valeur de l'Élevage et de la Pisciculture (PD-CVEP) suitability analysis for the establishment of Aqua Park areas.

    Considered non-intensive systems are: based on natural food supply from SWB or ponds; feed from integrated systems (crop/livestock byproducts or waste) or; with complementary feeding resourcing to on-farm or locally produced feed.

    The score results from combining sub-model outputs that characterize natural geographical and economical factors: 1. farm-gate sales - based on population density classification 2. Water balance - precipitation/evapotranspiration 3. Soil/slope suitability 4. Inputs - Crop and livestock byproducts

    It consists of an arithmetic weighted sum of normalized grids (0 to 100): ("WaterBalance" X 0.5) + ("Soil/Slope " X 0.25) + (“Byproducts” X 0.125) + (”FarmgateSales” X 0.125)

    Data creation: 2023-06-12

    Contact points:

    Metadata Contact: FAO-Data

    Resource Contact: Nelson Ribeiro

    Data lineage:

    Data sources, FAO Hand-in-Hand Geospatial Platform and OpenStreetMap (open data) including the following datasets:

    1. Atlas AI - Population Density (Africa, 2020) - Estimated total number of people per grid-cell 1km.
    2. Farm-gate sales : Class 4 - Very suitable: 150-300 [h/km²] Class 3 – Moderately suitable: 25-149 [h/km²] Class 2 – Marginally suitable: 1-24 [h/km²] Class 1 – Unsuitable: <1 and >300 [h/km²]

    3. WaPOR_2

    4. Water Balance: precipitation and evapotranspiration monthly time-series (2009 to 2020) mean water balance modelling values: (Precipitation *1.1) - (evapotranspiration*1.3)

    5. Soil/Slope - (1.5X soils) + Slope. Soil data from FAO (soil suitability for ponds), slope Watershed DEM 30s classification. Class 4 - Very suitable: <2 Class 3 – Moderately suitable: 2 - 5 Class 2 – Marginally suitable: 5 - 8 Class 1 – Unsuitable: > 8

    6. IFPRI MapSPAM 2017 - Production aggregate.

    7. GLW Gridded Livestock of the World - Gridded Livestock of the World (GLW 3 2010) - Chicken and duck.

    Resource constraints:

    Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC- SA 3.0 IGO)

    Online resources:

    Cameroun, non-intensive and integrated fish farming systems

  12. Non-intensive fish farming systems location score - AWI: Catfish and Tilapia...

    • data.amerigeoss.org
    jpeg, wmts, zip
    Updated Mar 19, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Food and Agriculture Organization (2024). Non-intensive fish farming systems location score - AWI: Catfish and Tilapia (Chad - ~1km) [Dataset]. https://data.amerigeoss.org/dataset/54b20051-0db0-4f06-9872-0e6846aa0aef
    Explore at:
    jpeg(481914), wmts, zip, jpeg(556484)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 19, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Food and Agriculture Organizationhttp://fao.org/
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Raster dataset representing a potential/suitability score for non-intensive and integrated, small-scale, African Catfish and Nile Tilapia fish farming systems, using ponds and small water bodies (SWB), in asset wealth index bellow the national average regions of the Republic of Chad. Produced under the scope of FAO’s Hand-in-Hand Initiative, Geographical Information Systems - Multicriteria Decision Analysis for value chain infrastructure location.

    Non-intensive aquaculture systems are considered based on natural food supply from SWB or ponds, from integrated systems (crop/livestock byproducts or waste), or with complementary feeding resourcing to on-farm or locally produced feed.

    The score results from combining sub-model outputs that characterize natural geographical and economical factors:

    1. Farm-gate sales - based on population density classification

    2. Water balance - precipitation/evapotranspiration

    3. Soil/slope suitability.

    4. Inputs - Crop and livestock byproducts

    It consists of an arithmetic weighted sum of normalized grids (0 to 100): ("WaterBalance" X 0.5) + ("Soil/Slope " X 0.25) + (“Byproducts” X 0.125) + (”FarmgateSales” X 0.125)

    Considered constraints or exclusive criteria are:

    1. Urban areas

    2. Protected areas

    3. Asset wealth Index national average

    Data publication: 2021-11-01

    Contact points:

    Metadata Contact: FAO-Data

    Resource Contact: Nelson Ribeiro

    Data lineage:

    Data sources, FAO Hand-in-Hand Geospatial Platform and OpenStreetMap (open data) including the following datasets:

    1. Atlas AI - Asset Wealth Index and Population Density (Africa, 2020).

    2. WaPOR_2 - Water Balance: precipitation and evapotranspiration monthly time-series (2009 to 2020) mean water balance modelling values: (Precipitation 1.1) - (evapotranspiration1.3) https://wapor.apps.fao.org/catalog/2

    3. Soil/Slope - (1.5X soils) + Slope. Soil data from FAO (soil suitability for ponds), slope HydroSHEDS DEM 30s (https://www.hydrosheds.org/hydrosheds-core-downloads) classification: Class 4 - Very suitable: <2 Class 3 – Moderately suitable: 2 - 5 Class 2 – Marginally suitable: 5 - 8 Class 1 – Unsuitable: > 8

    4. IFPRI MapSPAM 2017 - Production aggregate. https://data.apps.fao.org/map/catalog/srv/metadata/59f7a5ef-2be4-43ee-9600-a6a9e9ff562a

    5. Gridded Livestock of the World (GLW 4:) - Chicken and duck. https://data.apps.fao.org/catalog/iso/15f8c56c-5499-45d5-bd89-59ef6c026704

    Resource constraints:

    Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC- SA 3.0 IGO)

    Online resources:

    Download printable map, Chad

    Download printable map, Sudanian agroecological zone

  13. s

    Water level data @ Catfish Creek

    • sobos.at
    • floodalert.app
    Updated Apr 3, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    SOBOS GmbH, Shared Environment (2024). Water level data @ Catfish Creek [Dataset]. https://www.sobos.at/nl/river.php?river=Catfish%20Creek
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 3, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    SOBOS GmbH, Shared Environment
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/by/4.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/by/4.0/

    Area covered
    Description

    Online service voor waterstandinformatie voor BE, NL, USA, CA, UK, IE, DE, AT, CH en Zuid-Tirol. SMS- en e-mailwaarschuwing kan geactiveerd worden. Waarschuwt u bij overstromingen.

  14. Central African Republic - Intensive closed fish farming systems final...

    • data.amerigeoss.org
    jpeg, wmts, zip
    Updated Nov 7, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Food and Agriculture Organization (2023). Central African Republic - Intensive closed fish farming systems final location: African Catfish (~1km) [Dataset]. https://data.amerigeoss.org/dataset/3bf8dd86-3577-43a7-9a49-1eefffa72b4e
    Explore at:
    jpeg(278319), zip, jpeg(367118), wmtsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 7, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Food and Agriculture Organizationhttp://fao.org/
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Central African Republic
    Description

    Raster representing final recommended locations for intensive, closed, and semi-closed catfish farming systems using ponds, tanks, RAS, flow through and recirculation in the Central African Republic. Produced under the scope of FAO’s Hand-in-Hand Initiative, Geographical Information Systems - Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (GIS-MCDA) suitability assessment.

    Intensive systems are characterized by high densities and artificial feed input. Closed or semi-closed techniques are less dependent on biophysical criteria, it reuses/recirculates water, can be placed indoors or in compounds, and use man-made artificial materials.

    The score is achieved by processing sub-model outputs characterizing biophysical, infrastructure, and demand factors:

    Considered criteria:

    a. Market accessibility - major urban areas.

    b. Water Balance - precipitation/evapotranspiration.

    c. Potential yield

    d. Inputs - Crop and livestock

    e. Slope - terrain suitability.

    The location score is a simple arithmetic weighted sum of normalized/scaled grids, theoretically varying from 0 to 100: (“Accessibility MajorUrbanAreas” X 0.5) + ("WaterBalance" X 0.15) + ("PotentialYield" X 0.15) + (“CropsInput” X 0.075) + (“LivestockInput” X 0.075) + ("Slope " X 0.05)

    Final location mapping applies constraints and exclusive criteria, and consider the top 90th percentile. The resulting raster is classified in 3 equal intervals.

    Applied constraints and exclusive criteria are:

    a. Urban areas

    b. Protected areas

    c. Flood areas.

    a. Mobile broadband coverage

    b. Maximum distance to major roads (~2km: 0.018 degree)

    Data creation: 2023-10-19

    Contact points:

    Metadata Contact: FAO-Data

    Resource Contact: Nelson Ribeiro

    Data lineage:

    Data sources, FAO Hand-in-Hand Geospatial Platform and OpenStreetMap (open data) including the following datasets:

    a. Market Accessibility (urban areas) - OpenStreetMap and Atlas AI - Population Density (Africa, 2020) - Estimated total number of people per grid-cell 1km. (Urban areas = pop density>1200 habitants/km² AND area>5km²)

    b. Water Balance: WaPOR (https://wapor.apps.fao.org/home/WAPOR_2/1) precipitation and evapotranspiration monthly time-series from 2009 to 2020 for calculating a mean water balance layer modelling values: (Precipitation X 1.1) - (evapotranspiration X 1.3)

    c. Slope - terrain suitability - HydroSHEDS DEM 30s (https://www.hydrosheds.org/hydrosheds-core-downloads), classification. Class 4 - Very suitable: <2 Class 3 – Moderately suitable: 2 - 5 Class 2 – Marginally suitable: 5 - 8 Class 1 – Unsuitable: > 8

    d. Input crops - IFPRI Global Spatially-Disaggregated Crop Production Statistics Data for 2017 (MAPSPAM) - https://data.apps.fao.org/map/catalog/srv/metadata/59f7a5ef-2be4-43ee-9600-a6a9e9ff562a

    f. Input livestock – GLW: weighted animal density aggregate - GLW 4: https://data.apps.fao.org/catalog/iso/15f8c56c-5499-45d5-bd89-59ef6c026704

    g. Protected areas - UNEP-WCMC and IUCN (2021), Protected Planet. https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/thematic-areas/wdpa

    h. Mobile broadband connectivity – Mobile Broadband Coverage 2021 - Collins Bartholomew Mobile Coverage Explorer derived. https://data.apps.fao.org/catalog/iso/a79fd49a-3eeb-4f4e-a0ed-e5f28dbe3a1c

    i. World Bank: World - Photovoltaic Power Potential (PVOUT) GIS Data, (Global Solar Atlas) - https://globalsolaratlas.info/global-pv-potential-study

    Resource constraints:

    Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC- SA 3.0 IGO)

    Online resources:

    Zip package containing TIF (dataset) and SLD (style) files.

  15. f

    Water level data @ Catfish Creek

    • floodalert.app
    • sobos.at
    • +1more
    Updated Jul 23, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    SOBOS GmbH, Shared Environment (2024). Water level data @ Catfish Creek [Dataset]. https://floodalert.app/it/river.php?river=Catfish%20Creek
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 23, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    SOBOS GmbH, Shared Environment
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/by/4.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/by/4.0/

    Area covered
    Description

    Servizi online per il monitoraggio delle acque in USA, UK, IE, DE, AT, CH e Sud Tirolo. Possono essere attivati avvisi tramite SMS e EMail. Ricevi avvisi in caso di inondazione.

  16. Central African Republic - Intensive closed fish farming systems location...

    • data.amerigeoss.org
    jpeg, wmts, zip
    Updated Nov 7, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Food and Agriculture Organization (2023). Central African Republic - Intensive closed fish farming systems location score using photovoltaic energy: African Catfish (~1km) [Dataset]. https://data.amerigeoss.org/sk/dataset/dac0ffa8-27b4-47a3-8cfd-0b215b937597
    Explore at:
    jpeg(366764), zip, wmtsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 7, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Food and Agriculture Organizationhttp://fao.org/
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Central African Republic
    Description

    Raster representing suitability score for intensive, closed, and semi-closed catfish farming systems using photovoltaic (PV) alternative energy, for ponds, tanks, RAS, flow through and recirculation in the Central African Republic. Produced under the scope of FAO’s Hand-in-Hand Initiative, Geographical Information Systems - Multi-criteria Decision Analysis suitability assessment.

    Intensive systems are characterized by high densities and artificial feed input. Closed or semi-closed techniques are less dependent on biophysical criteria, it reuses/recirculates water, can be placed indoors or in compounds, and use man-made artificial materials.

    Adoption is limited by poor and unreliable energy distribution networks, PV potential is introduced as an intensification criterion, to supply operational needs (pumps, aerators).

    The score is achieved by processing sub-model outputs characterizing biophysical, infrastructure, and demand factors:

    Considered criteria:

    a. Market accessibility - major urban areas.

    b. Water Balance - precipitation/evapotranspiration.

    c. Potential yield

    d. Inputs - Crop and livestock

    e. Slope - terrain suitability.

    f. Photovoltaic (PV) energy potential.

    The location score is a simple arithmetic weighted sum of normalized/scaled grids (0 to 100):

    (“Accessibility MajorUrbanAreas”x 0.4) + (PVOUT x 0.10) + ("potential Yield"x 0.15) + (“CropsInput” x 0.1) + (“LivestockInput” x 0.1) + (("WaterBalance" x 0.1) + ("Slope "x 0.05)

    Data creation: 2023-10-18

    Contact points:

    Metadata Contact: FAO-Data

    Resource Contact: Nelson Ribeiro

    Data lineage:

    Data sources, FAO Hand-in-Hand Geospatial Platform and OpenStreetMap (open data) including the following datasets:

    a. Market Accessibility (urban areas) - OpenStreetMap and Atlas AI - Population Density (Africa, 2020) - Estimated total number of people per grid-cell 1km. (Urban areas = pop density>1200 habitants/km² AND area>5km²)

    b. Water Balance: WaPOR (https://wapor.apps.fao.org/home/WAPOR_2/1) precipitation and evapotranspiration monthly time-series from 2009 to 2020 for calculating a mean water balance layer modelling values: (Precipitation X 1.1) - (evapotranspiration X 1.3)

    c. Slope - terrain suitability - HydroSHEDS DEM 30s (https://www.hydrosheds.org/hydrosheds-core-downloads), classification. Class 4 - Very suitable: <2 Class 3 – Moderately suitable: 2 - 5 Class 2 – Marginally suitable: 5 - 8 Class 1 – Unsuitable: > 8

    d. Input crops - IFPRI Global Spatially-Disaggregated Crop Production Statistics Data for 2017 (MAPSPAM) - https://data.apps.fao.org/map/catalog/srv/metadata/59f7a5ef-2be4-43ee-9600-a6a9e9ff562a

    f. Input livestock – GLW: weighted animal density aggregate - GLW 4: https://data.apps.fao.org/catalog/iso/15f8c56c-5499-45d5-bd89-59ef6c026704

    g. Protected areas - UNEP-WCMC and IUCN (2021), Protected Planet. https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/thematic-areas/wdpa

    h. Mobile broadband connectivity – Mobile Broadband Coverage 2021 - Collins Bartholomew Mobile Coverage Explorer derived. https://data.apps.fao.org/catalog/iso/a79fd49a-3eeb-4f4e-a0ed-e5f28dbe3a1c

    i. World Bank: World - Photovoltaic Power Potential (PVOUT) GIS Data, (Global Solar Atlas) - https://globalsolaratlas.info/global-pv-potential-study

    Resource constraints:

    Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC BY-NC- SA 3.0 IGO)

    Online resources:

    Zip package containing TIF (dataset) and SLD (style) files.

  17. s

    Water level data @ Catfish Creek

    • sobos.at
    • floodalert.app
    Updated Jun 25, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    SOBOS GmbH, Shared Environment (2024). Water level data @ Catfish Creek [Dataset]. https://www.sobos.at/de/river.php?river=Catfish%20Creek
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 25, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    SOBOS GmbH, Shared Environment
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/by/4.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/by/4.0/

    Area covered
    Description

    Online Service für Wasserstandsüberwachung in den USA, CA, BE, NL, UK, IE, DE, AT, CH und Südtirol.

  18. U.S. adults who have interacted with a catfish on social media 2022

    • statista.com
    Updated Mar 7, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2022). U.S. adults who have interacted with a catfish on social media 2022 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1293358/us-adults-who-have-interacted-with-catfish/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 7, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jan 14, 2022 - Jan 15, 2022
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    As of January 2022, 38 percent of surveyed U.S. adults said that they had definitely never interacted with a catfish on social media. However, 13 percent of respondents reported that they definitely had interacted with a catfish on a social media platform and 17 percent said that they probably had. Additionally, 16 percent stated they had probably not been the victim of an online fictional persona scam whilst using social media.

  19. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2025). UK adults on catfishing awareness and experiences 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1467264/uk-adults-catfishing-awareness-experiences/
Organization logo

UK adults on catfishing awareness and experiences 2023

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Jul 8, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Time period covered
2023
Area covered
United Kingdom
Description

According to a survey conducted in the United Kingdom between 2022 and 2023, almost half of all adults had an increased awareness of catfiashing. Overall, ** percent had personally experienced catfishing, and ** percent knew someone who had been catfished. Additionally, one in *** respondents were aware of a catfishing victim who was aged under 18 years. Catfishing is a type of dating scam where people create fake identities on social media and dating sites.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu