https://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/data-usage-policies-and-restrictions/https://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/data-usage-policies-and-restrictions/
This CBIS-DDSM (Curated Breast Imaging Subset of DDSM) is an updated and standardized version of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM). The DDSM is a database of 2,620 scanned film mammography studies. It contains normal, benign, and malignant cases with verified pathology information. The scale of the database along with ground truth validation makes the DDSM a useful tool in the development and testing of decision support systems. The CBIS-DDSM collection includes a subset of the DDSM data selected and curated by a trained mammographer. The images have been decompressed and converted to DICOM format. Updated ROI segmentation and bounding boxes, and pathologic diagnosis for training data are also included. A manuscript describing how to use this dataset in detail is available at https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata2017177.
Published research results from work in developing decision support systems in mammography are difficult to replicate due to the lack of a standard evaluation data set; most computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) and detection (CADe) algorithms for breast cancer in mammography are evaluated on private data sets or on unspecified subsets of public databases. Few well-curated public datasets have been provided for the mammography community. These include the DDSM, the Mammographic Imaging Analysis Society (MIAS) database, and the Image Retrieval in Medical Applications (IRMA) project. Although these public data sets are useful, they are limited in terms of data set size and accessibility.
For example, most researchers using the DDSM do not leverage all its images for a variety of historical reasons. When the database was released in 1997, computational resources to process hundreds or thousands of images were not widely available. Additionally, the DDSM images are saved in non-standard compression files that require the use of decompression code that has not been updated or maintained for modern computers. Finally, the ROI annotations for the abnormalities in the DDSM were provided to indicate a general position of lesions, but not a precise segmentation for them. Therefore, many researchers must implement segmentation algorithms for accurate feature extraction. This causes an inability to directly compare the performance of methods or to replicate prior results. The CBIS-DDSM collection addresses that challenge by publicly releasing an curated and standardized version of the DDSM for evaluation of future CADx and CADe systems (sometimes referred to generally as CAD) research in mammography.
Please note that the image data for this collection is structured such that each participant has multiple patient IDs. For example, participant 00038 has 10 separate patient IDs which provide information about the scans within the IDs (e.g. Calc-Test_P_00038_LEFT_CC, Calc-Test_P_00038_RIGHT_CC_1). This makes it appear as though there are 6,671 patients according to the DICOM metadata, but there are only 1,566 actual participants in the cohort.
For scientific and other inquiries about this dataset, please contact TCIA's Helpdesk.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The CBIS-DDSM: Curated Breast Imaging Subset of Digital Database for Screening Mammography includes decompressed images, data selection and curation by trained mammographers, updated mass segmentation and bounding boxes, and pathologic diagnosis for training data, formatted similarly to modern computer vision data sets. The data set contains 753 calcification cases and 891 mass cases, providing a data set size capable of analyzing decision support systems in mammography.
Authors mention that published research results are difficult to replicate due to the lack of a standard evaluation data set in the area of decision support systems in mammography; most computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) and detection (CADe) algorithms for breast cancer in mammography are evaluated on private data sets or on unspecified subsets of public databases. This causes an inability to directly compare the performance of methods or to replicate prior results. Authors seek to resolve this substantial challenge by releasing an updated and standardized version of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM) for evaluation of future CADx and CADe systems (sometimes referred to generally as CAD) research in mammography.
The DDSM is a collection of mammograms from the following sources: Massachusetts General Hospital, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Sacred Heart Hospital, and Washington University of St Louis School of Medicine. The DDSM was developed through a grant from the DOD Breast Cancer Research Program, US Army Research and Material Command, and the necessary patient consents were obtained by the original developers of the DDSM. The cases are annotated with ROIs for calcifications and masses, as well as the following information that may be useful for CADe and CADx algorithms: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) descriptors for mass shape, mass margin, calcification type, calcification distribution, and breast density; overall BI-RADS assessment from 0 to 5; rating of the subtlety of the abnormality from 1 to 5; and patient age.
Mass margin and shape have long been proven substantial indicators for diagnosis in mammography. Because of this, many methods are based on developing mathematical descriptions of the tumour outline. Due to the dependence of these methods on accurate ROI segmentation and the imprecise nature of many of the DDSM-provided annotations, as seen in Fig. 1, we applied a lesion segmentation algorithm (described below) that is initialized by the general original DDSM contours but is able to supply much more accurate ROIs. Figure 1 contains example ROIs from the DDSM, our mammographer, and the automated segmentation algorithm. As shown, the DDSM outlines provide only a general location and not a precise mass boundary. The segmentation algorithm was designed to provide an exact delineation of the mass from the surrounding tissue. This segmentation was done only for masses and not calcifications.
Separate sets of cases for training and testing algorithms are important for ensuring that all researchers are using the same cases for these tasks. Specifically, the test set should contain cases of varying difficulty in order to ensure that the method is tested thoroughly. The data were split into a training set and a testing set based on the BI-RADS category. This allows for an appropriate stratification for researchers working on CADe as well as CADx. Note that many of the BI-RADS assessments likely were updated after additional information was gathered by the physician, as it is unconventional to subscribe BI-RADS 4 and 5 to screening images. The split was obtained using 20% of the cases for testing and the rest for training. The data were split for all mass cases and all calcification cases separately. Here ‘case’ is used to indicate a particular abnormality, seen on the craniocaudal (CC) and/or mediolateral oblique (MLO) views, which are the standard views for screening mammography. Figure 2 displays the histograms of BI-RADS assessment and pathology for the training and test sets for calcification cases and mass cases. As shown, the data split was performed in such a way as to provide an equal level of difficulty in the training and test sets.
The original images are distributed at the full mammography and abnormality level as DICOM files. Full mammography images include both MLO and CC views of the mammograms.
Metadata for each abnormality was transferred from the original csv files to tag format. For example:
Patient ID: the first 7 characters of images in the case file
Density category
Breast: Left or Right
View: CC or MLO
Mass shape (when applicable)
Mass margin (when applicable)
Calcification type (when applicable)
Calcification d...
The CBIS-DDSM dataset consists of mammograms for 1,566 patients provided in DICOM format with metadata in CSV files. Among its contents, the full mammogram images, which originally numbered 3,120, had 34 excluded, resulting in 3,086 images. These were then converted to 8-bit PNG files and organized into 'cancer' and 'not_cancer' folders based on their pathology for both training and testing purposes.The CBIS-DDSM dataset consists of mammograms for 1,566 patients provided in DICOM format with… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/dbaek111/CBIS-DDSM_1024.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
PurposeUsing computer-aided design (CAD) systems, this research endeavors to enhance breast cancer segmentation by addressing data insufficiency and data complexity during model training. As perceived by computer vision models, the inherent symmetry and complexity of mammography images make segmentation difficult. The objective is to optimize the precision and effectiveness of medical imaging.MethodsThe study introduces a hybrid strategy combining shape-guided segmentation (SGS) and M3D-neural cellular automata (M3D-NCA), resulting in improved computational efficiency and performance. The implementation of Shape-guided segmentation (SGS) during the initialization phase, coupled with the elimination of convolutional layers, enables the model to effectively reduce computation time. The research proposes a novel loss function that combines segmentation losses from both components for effective training.ResultsThe robust technique provided aims to improve the accuracy and consistency of breast tumor segmentation, leading to significant improvements in medical imaging and breast cancer detection and treatment.ConclusionThis study enhances breast cancer segmentation in medical imaging using CAD systems. Combining shape-guided segmentation (SGS) and M3D-neural cellular automata (M3D-NCA) is a hybrid approach that improves performance and computational efficiency by dealing with complex data and not having enough training data. The approach also reduces computing time and improves training efficiency. The study aims to improve breast cancer detection and treatment methods in medical imaging technology.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Explore the comprehensive DDSM and CBIS-DDSM mammogram image dataset, featuring 55,890 pre-processed images resized to 299x299 pixels.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Re-curated Breast Imaging Subset DDSM Dataset (RBIS-DDSM) is a curated version of 849 images from the CBIS-DDSM dataset available online with a permissive copyright license (CC-BY-SA 3.0). The CBIS-DDSM dataset is an improved version of the DDSM dataset. The authors of the CBIS-DDSM dataset attempted to improve the ground truth by applying simple image processing based methods to enhance the edges without any manual intervention from medical experts in order to segment and annotate masses.
Attribution-NoDerivs 4.0 (CC BY-ND 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
By downloading this complete Mini-DDSM Data Set, you agree to the following:
You can read the Paper that describes the initial attempt to collect this free data set and the experiments we conducted. It required a tremendous time, coding and machine processing power to get it in shape to make it as much as possible accessible for the research community. Below, are some of the merits of this new Mini-DDSM version:
https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F1822946%2F3905483ba6e03b7142a9121a03824558%2FRaws.png?generation=1609421580586145&alt=media" alt="">
Figure 1. The first few rows of the accompanying excel sheet.
This is the light-weight version of the popular DDSM (Digital Database for Screening Mammography) [Ref] data set which currently is obsolete. To answer the nagging question why Mini-DDSM, it is important to know that the DDSM database has a website maintained at the University of South Florida for purposes of keeping it accessible on the web. However, image files are compressed with lossless JPEG (i.e., “.LJPEG”) encoding that are generated using a broken software (or at least an outdated tool as described on the DDSM website). CBIS-DDSM provides an alternative host of the original DDSM, but unfortunately, images are stripped from their original identification filename and from the age attribute. Figure 2 illustrates the age distribution in this complete Mini-DDSM and Fig.3 exhibits the density (amount of Fibroglandular tissue) distribution using Bi-Rads scoring.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ARDISDataset/MiniDDSM/master/AgeDistributionW.png" alt="Age Distr">
Figure 2. Age distribution in this complete version of the Mini-DDSM data set.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ARDISDataset/MiniDDSM/master/BIRADS.png" alt="Density">
Figure 3. Density distribution in this complete version of the Mini-DDSM data set.
Please give us feedback/suggestions to improve the data set to:
https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F1822946%2F756766cadde4657770f39cc63613908f%2FContact.png?generation=1605701971315133&alt=media" alt="">
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
https://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/data-usage-policies-and-restrictions/https://www.cancerimagingarchive.net/data-usage-policies-and-restrictions/
This CBIS-DDSM (Curated Breast Imaging Subset of DDSM) is an updated and standardized version of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM). The DDSM is a database of 2,620 scanned film mammography studies. It contains normal, benign, and malignant cases with verified pathology information. The scale of the database along with ground truth validation makes the DDSM a useful tool in the development and testing of decision support systems. The CBIS-DDSM collection includes a subset of the DDSM data selected and curated by a trained mammographer. The images have been decompressed and converted to DICOM format. Updated ROI segmentation and bounding boxes, and pathologic diagnosis for training data are also included. A manuscript describing how to use this dataset in detail is available at https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata2017177.
Published research results from work in developing decision support systems in mammography are difficult to replicate due to the lack of a standard evaluation data set; most computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) and detection (CADe) algorithms for breast cancer in mammography are evaluated on private data sets or on unspecified subsets of public databases. Few well-curated public datasets have been provided for the mammography community. These include the DDSM, the Mammographic Imaging Analysis Society (MIAS) database, and the Image Retrieval in Medical Applications (IRMA) project. Although these public data sets are useful, they are limited in terms of data set size and accessibility.
For example, most researchers using the DDSM do not leverage all its images for a variety of historical reasons. When the database was released in 1997, computational resources to process hundreds or thousands of images were not widely available. Additionally, the DDSM images are saved in non-standard compression files that require the use of decompression code that has not been updated or maintained for modern computers. Finally, the ROI annotations for the abnormalities in the DDSM were provided to indicate a general position of lesions, but not a precise segmentation for them. Therefore, many researchers must implement segmentation algorithms for accurate feature extraction. This causes an inability to directly compare the performance of methods or to replicate prior results. The CBIS-DDSM collection addresses that challenge by publicly releasing an curated and standardized version of the DDSM for evaluation of future CADx and CADe systems (sometimes referred to generally as CAD) research in mammography.
Please note that the image data for this collection is structured such that each participant has multiple patient IDs. For example, participant 00038 has 10 separate patient IDs which provide information about the scans within the IDs (e.g. Calc-Test_P_00038_LEFT_CC, Calc-Test_P_00038_RIGHT_CC_1). This makes it appear as though there are 6,671 patients according to the DICOM metadata, but there are only 1,566 actual participants in the cohort.
For scientific and other inquiries about this dataset, please contact TCIA's Helpdesk.