This map service contains publicly available data hosted by the Bowling Green-Warren County City-County Planning Commission (CCPC).

This feature service pulls data from https://webgis.bgky.org/server/rest/services/CCPC/CCPC_Address_Point/FeatureServer/0. It is a publicly available dataset provided by the City County Planning Commission of Warren County, Kentucky (CCPC).This data should be used for planning purposes only. All questions about data accuracy and completeness should be directed to CCPC

The studies carried out in the context of the development of the Epernay PPRi (map of hazards) were carried out on the scale of 1/10 000th, and mapped on a background IGN scan25 enlarged to 1/10 000th. Since regulatory zoning stems from the intersection of the hazard map and the stake map, the accuracy of this mapping cannot be greater than that of the hazards. Consequently, the scale of use of the regulatory zoning is that of 1/10 000 and exploitation on a smaller cadastral scale (1/5000 or 1/2000) is not recommended. However, municipalities wishing to do so may transpose the regulatory map into their planning documents provided that they comply with operating principles in order to take account of the uncertainty associated with the expansion of the zoning, particularly at the boundary of the area.

Indeed, it is not possible to improve the accuracy of the initial data which presents uncertainty about its contours of the order of 10 metres, which is relatively important on the scale of a plot in an urbanised area.

The transposition of the regulatory map into a cadastral planning document cannot therefore be limited to a mere enlargement, which would result in a false precision of the contours. Therefore, a guide defines the principles that would allow municipalities who wish to do so, a transposition into an urban planning document (PLU, municipal map) taking into account the uncertainties between each area. It must also make it possible to define the area regulation to be applied when considering planning permissions.

The hazard that made it possible to construct the Regulatory Zoning, as well as the stakes are located under gaspar No. 51DDT20170001

Spatial resolution: 1/2 500

Genealogy: The limits of the uncertainty band are not represented on the graphic documents of the RPP, they are not official in nature. The boundaries of the uncertainty band straddle the separation between two zones of the Regulatory Zonage, which do not follow cadastral or administrative boundaries. The width of this limit is set at 10 metres. A guide to the interpretation of this band sets out the principles for its operation.

The total added building value in Cuyahoga County, summarized annually between 2004 and 2023, is aggregated using 2000-foot-wide tessellated hexagons, based on data from the Cuyahoga County Fiscal Office's DeltaTrack system. This dataset includes records of issued new construction permits (Reason Code=30) from 2004 to 2023. To ensure high geospatial accuracy, approximately 99.5% of these permits have been geocoded using data from the Cuyahoga County GIS Combined Parcels database.Data Sources:Cuyahoga County Fiscal Office (DeltaTrack)Coverage:Start Year: 2004End Year: 2023Update Frequency: Annually

This dataset contains the scope of exposure to flood risk of the public institution of intercommunal cooperation (EPCI) Communauté de Communes des Paysages de la Champagne (CCPC) which partly corresponds to the scope regulated by the PPRi prescribed by prefectoral decree of 12 October 2017. This partial perimeter on the CCPC will be public easement and will be entered in easement PM1 upon completion of the approval. Spatial resolution: 1/10 000 Genealogy: The perimeter of the prescribed PPRi is provided in the Prefect’s prescription order. The regulated scope corresponds to the geometric aggregation of all the restricted areas included in the same PPRi. The scope of the study corresponds to the envelope of the EPCI concerned in which the hazards were studied.

This layer is a high-resolution tree canopy change-detection layer for Cuyahoga County, Ohio. It contains three tree-canopy classes for the period 2011-2017: (1) No Change; (2) Gain; and (3) Loss.It was created by extracting tree canopy from existing high-resolution land-cover maps for 2011 and 2017 and then comparing the mapped trees directly. Tree canopy that existed during both time periods was assigned to the No Change category while trees removed by development, storms, or disease were assigned to the Loss class. Trees planted during the interval were assigned to the Gain category, as were the edges of existing trees that expanded noticeably. Direct comparison was possible because both the 2011 and 2017 maps were created using object-based image analysis (OBIA) and included similar source datasets (LiDAR-derived surface models, multispectral imagery, and thematic GIS inputs). The 2011 land cover dataset was produced by the SAL using 2006 LiDAR, 2011 NAIP and Ortho Imagery. The 2017 dataset was created using Cuyahoga County LiDAR, NAIP, and Ortho imagery from 2017. OBIA systems work by grouping pixels into meaningful objects based on their spectral and spatial properties, while taking into account boundaries imposed by existing vector datasets. Within the OBIA environment a rule-based expert system was designed to effectively mimic the process of manual image analysis by incorporating the elements of image interpretation (color/tone, texture, pattern, location, size, and shape) into the classification process. A series of morphological procedures were employed to insure that the end product is both accurate and cartographically pleasing.No accuracy assessment was conducted, but the dataset will be subjected to manual review and correction.