17 datasets found
  1. VSRR Provisional Maternal Death Counts and Rates

    • healthdata.gov
    • data.virginia.gov
    • +2more
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Mar 17, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data.cdc.gov (2023). VSRR Provisional Maternal Death Counts and Rates [Dataset]. https://healthdata.gov/w/ehys-jtzp/default?cur=gU0o09p1SY-
    Explore at:
    tsv, csv, application/rssxml, application/rdfxml, xml, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 17, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    data.cdc.gov
    Description

    This data presents national-level provisional maternal mortality rates based on a current flow of mortality and natality data in the National Vital Statistics System. Provisional rates which are an early estimate of the number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, are shown as of the date specified and may not include all deaths and births that occurred during a given time period (see Technical Notes).

    A maternal death is the death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy irrespective of the duration and the site of the pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management, but not from accidental or incidental causes. In this data visualization, maternal deaths are those deaths with an underlying cause of death assigned to International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) code numbers A34, O00–O95, and O98–O99.

    The provisional data include reported 12 month-ending provisional maternal mortality rates overall, by age, and by race and Hispanic origin. Provisional maternal mortality rates presented in this data visualization are for “12-month ending periods,” defined as the number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births occurring in the 12-month period ending in the month indicated. For example, the 12-month ending period in June 2020 would include deaths and births occurring from July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020. Evaluation of trends over time should compare estimates from year to year (June 2020 and June 2021), rather than month to month, to avoid overlapping time periods. In the visualization and in the accompanying data file, rates based on death counts less than 20 are suppressed in accordance with current NCHS standards of reliability for rates. Death counts between 1-9 in the data file are suppressed in accordance with National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) confidentiality standards.

    Provisional data presented on this page will be updated on a quarterly basis as additional records are received. Previously released estimates are revised to include data and record updates received since the previous release. As a result, the reliability of estimates for a 12-month period ending with a specific month will improve with each quarterly release and estimates for previous time periods may change as new data and updates are received.

  2. CDC WONDER: Mortality - Infant Deaths

    • catalog.data.gov
    • healthdata.gov
    Updated Feb 22, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health & Human Services (2025). CDC WONDER: Mortality - Infant Deaths [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/cdc-wonder-mortality-infant-deaths
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 22, 2025
    Description

    The Mortality - Infant Deaths (from Linked Birth / Infant Death Records) online databases on CDC WONDER provide counts and rates for deaths of children under 1 year of age, occuring within the United States to U.S. residents. Information from death certificates has been linked to corresponding birth certificates. Data are available by county of mother's residence, child's age, underlying cause of death, sex, birth weight, birth plurality, birth order, gestational age at birth, period of prenatal care, maternal race and ethnicity, maternal age, maternal education and marital status. Data are available since 1995. The data are produced by the National Center for Health Statistics.

  3. Infant, neonatal, postneonatal, fetal, and perinatal mortality rates, by...

    • datasets.ai
    • healthdata.gov
    • +3more
    23, 40, 55, 8
    Updated Aug 27, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (2024). Infant, neonatal, postneonatal, fetal, and perinatal mortality rates, by detailed race and Hispanic origin of mother: United States [Dataset]. https://datasets.ai/datasets/infant-neonatal-postneonatal-fetal-and-perinatal-mortality-rates-by-detailed-race-and-hisp-016ed
    Explore at:
    23, 40, 55, 8Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 27, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Department of Health and Human Serviceshttp://www.hhs.gov/
    Authors
    U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Data on infant, neonatal, postneonatal, fetal, and perinatal mortality rates by selected characteristics of the mother. Please refer to the PDF or Excel version of this table in the HUS 2019 Data Finder (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus/contents2019.htm) for critical information about measures, definitions, and changes over time.

    SOURCE: NCHS, National Vital Statistics System, public-use Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set, public-use Fetal Death File, and public-use Birth File. For more information on the National Vital Statistics System, see the corresponding Appendix entry at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus19-appendix-508.pdf.

  4. V

    Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) - Datathon23

    • data.virginia.gov
    html
    Updated Feb 12, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) - Datathon23 [Dataset]. https://data.virginia.gov/dataset/pregnancy-risk-assessment-monitoring-system-prams-datathon23
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 12, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Other
    Description

    PRAMS, the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, is a surveillance project of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and health departments. Developed in 1987, PRAMS collects site-specific, population-based data on maternal attitudes and experiences before, during, and shortly after pregnancy. PRAMS surveillance currently covers about 81% of all U.S. births.

  5. CDC PRAMStat Data for 2011

    • healthdata.gov
    • data.virginia.gov
    • +2more
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Feb 25, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data.cdc.gov (2021). CDC PRAMStat Data for 2011 [Dataset]. https://healthdata.gov/w/aprg-9pvb/default?cur=IPQf1ro8hRX
    Explore at:
    tsv, json, application/rdfxml, csv, xml, application/rssxmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 25, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    data.cdc.gov
    Description
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). PRAMS, the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, is a surveillance system collecting state-specific, population-based data on maternal attitudes and experiences before, during, and shortly after pregnancy. It is a collaborative project of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and state health departments. PRAMS provides data for state health officials to use to improve the health of mothers and infants. PRAMS topics include abuse, alcohol use, contraception, breastfeeding, mental health, morbidity, obesity, preconception health, pregnancy history, prenatal-care, sleep behavior, smoke exposure, stress, tobacco use, WIC, Medicaid, infant health, and unintended pregnancy. Data will be updated annually as it becomes available.
  6. f

    Data from: S1 Dataset -

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jul 1, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tsitsi Brenda Makanyanga; Bernard Madzima; More Mungati; Addmore Chadambuka; Notion Tafara Gombe; Tsitsi Patience Juru; Chukwuma David Umeokonkwo; Mufuta Tshimanga (2024). S1 Dataset - [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301929.s001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 1, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Tsitsi Brenda Makanyanga; Bernard Madzima; More Mungati; Addmore Chadambuka; Notion Tafara Gombe; Tsitsi Patience Juru; Chukwuma David Umeokonkwo; Mufuta Tshimanga
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    BackgroundMaternal mortality is of global concern, almost 800 women die every day due to maternal complications. The maternal death surveillance and response (MDSR) system is one strategy designed to reduce maternal mortality. In 2021 Makonde District reported a maternal mortality ratio of 275 per 100 000 and only sixty-two percent of deaths recorded were audited. We evaluated the MDSR system in Makonde to assess its performance.MethodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using the CDC guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems. An Interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from 79 health workers involved in MDSR and healthcare facilities. All maternal death notification forms, weekly disease surveillance forms, and facility monthly summary forms were reviewed. We assessed health workers’ knowledge, usefulness and system attributes.ResultsWe interviewed 79 health workers out of 211 workers involved in MDSR and 71 (89.9%) were nurses. The median years in service was 8 (IQR: 4–12). Overall health worker knowledge (77.2%) was good. Ninety-three percent of the deaths audited were of avoidable causes. Twelve out of the thirty-eight (31.6%) facilities were using electronic health records system. Feedback and documented shared information were evident at four facilities (21%) including the referral hospital. Nineteen (67.9%) out of 28 maternal death notification forms were completed within seven days and none were submitted to the PMD on time.ConclusionThe MDSR system was acceptable and simple but not timely, stable and complete. Underutilization of the electronic health system, work load, poor documentation and data management impeded performance of the system. We recommended appointment of an MDSR focal person, sharing audit minutes and improved data management.

  7. CDC PRAMStat Data for 2001

    • chronicdata.cdc.gov
    • healthdata.gov
    • +3more
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Mar 17, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Division of Reproductive Health Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) (2015). CDC PRAMStat Data for 2001 [Dataset]. https://chronicdata.cdc.gov/Maternal-Child-Health/CDC-PRAMStat-Data-for-2001/u93h-quup
    Explore at:
    csv, tsv, application/rdfxml, json, xml, application/rssxmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 17, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Preventionhttp://www.cdc.gov/
    Authors
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Division of Reproductive Health Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS)
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Description
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). PRAMS, the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, is a surveillance system collecting state-specific, population-based data on maternal attitudes and experiences before, during, and shortly after pregnancy. It is a collaborative project of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and state health departments. PRAMS provides data for state health officials to use to improve the health of mothers and infants. PRAMS topics include abuse, alcohol use, contraception, breastfeeding, mental health, morbidity, obesity, preconception health, pregnancy history, prenatal-care, sleep behavior, smoke exposure, stress, tobacco use, WIC, Medicaid, infant health, and unintended pregnancy. Data will be updated annually as it becomes available.
  8. CDC PRAMStat Data for 2006

    • data.virginia.gov
    • healthdata.gov
    • +5more
    csv, json, rdf, xsl
    Updated Sep 5, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2023). CDC PRAMStat Data for 2006 [Dataset]. https://data.virginia.gov/dataset/cdc-pramstat-data-for-2006
    Explore at:
    xsl, csv, json, rdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 5, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Preventionhttp://www.cdc.gov/
    Description
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). PRAMS, the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, is a surveillance system collecting state-specific, population-based data on maternal attitudes and experiences before, during, and shortly after pregnancy. It is a collaborative project of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and state health departments. PRAMS provides data for state health officials to use to improve the health of mothers and infants. PRAMS topics include abuse, alcohol use, contraception, breastfeeding, mental health, morbidity, obesity, preconception health, pregnancy history, prenatal-care, sleep behavior, smoke exposure, stress, tobacco use, WIC, Medicaid, infant health, and unintended pregnancy. Data will be updated annually as it becomes available.
  9. Preliminary Estimates of Visits to Health Centers in the United States,...

    • data.cdc.gov
    • healthdata.gov
    • +1more
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Dec 13, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    NCHS/DHCS (2024). Preliminary Estimates of Visits to Health Centers in the United States, January 2022-June 2024 [Dataset]. https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/Preliminary-Estimates-of-Visits-to-Health-Centers-/367e-pucc
    Explore at:
    json, xml, csv, application/rdfxml, tsv, application/rssxmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 13, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    California Department of Health Care Serviceshttp://www.dhcs.ca.gov/
    Authors
    NCHS/DHCS
    License

    https://www.usa.gov/government-workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works

    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) Health Center Component, conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), collects annual data on visits to health centers to describe patterns of utilization and provision of ambulatory care delivery in the United States. Data are collected from federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) and FQHC look-alikes from all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia and are used to develop nationally representative estimates. The data include preliminary, biannual counts and rates of health center visits from January 2022-June 2024 by medical diagnosis chapters, maternal and reproductive health-related diagnoses, mental health disorders, and respiratory conditions, stratified by selected patient characteristics. Estimates are split into biannual time periods (January to June, and July to December) and are considered preliminary, meaning they may differ from final estimates.

  10. f

    Postpartum contraceptive use by experience of physical IPV during pregnancy...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Dec 11, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Rashida-E Ijdi; Janine Barden-O’Fallon (2024). Postpartum contraceptive use by experience of physical IPV during pregnancy or 12 months before pregnancy in the United States, PRAMS 2016–2021. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314938.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 11, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Rashida-E Ijdi; Janine Barden-O’Fallon
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Postpartum contraceptive use by experience of physical IPV during pregnancy or 12 months before pregnancy in the United States, PRAMS 2016–2021.

  11. t

    National Survey of Family Growth - (2013-2015) Pregnancy File

    • thearda.com
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), National Survey of Family Growth - (2013-2015) Pregnancy File [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AVZ35
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    The Association of Religion Data Archives
    Authors
    National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS)
    Dataset funded by
    National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS)
    Description

    The National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) is designed and administered by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), an agency with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (DHHS/CDC). Since the NSFG began in 1973, there have been nine data release files. The purpose of the survey is to produce reliable national estimates of: - Factors affecting pregnancy, including sexual activity, contraceptive use, and infertility; - The medical care associated with contraception, infertility, and childbirth; - Factors affecting marriage, divorce, cohabitation, and adoption; - Adoption and caring for nonbiological children - Father involvement behaviors, and - Men's and women's attitudes about sex, childbearing, and marriage. The survey contains key religion variables that may relate to these topics. The survey results are used by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and other research and policy organizations to plan health services and health education programs, and to do statistical studies on the topics listed above. ("https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nsfg/nsfg_2013_2015_userguide_maintext.pdf#page=6" Target="_blank">NSFG 2013-2015 User's Guide: Main Text) Each wave of the NSFG survey contains a Female Respondent Survey, Male Respondent Survey, and a Pregnancy Survey. This is the Pregnancy Survey.

  12. t

    National Survey of Family Growth - (2015-2017) Female Respondent File

    • thearda.com
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), National Survey of Family Growth - (2015-2017) Female Respondent File [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Z3H2Q
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    The Association of Religion Data Archives
    Authors
    National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS)
    Dataset funded by
    National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS)
    Description

    'The National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) is designed and administered by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), an agency with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (DHHS/CDC)....Since the NSFG began in 1973, there have been 10 data release files. 'The purpose of the survey is to produce reliable national estimates of: - Factors affecting pregnancy, including sexual activity, contraceptive use, and infertility; - The medical care associated with contraception, infertility, and childbirth; - Factors affecting marriage, divorce, cohabitation, and family building; - Adoption and caring for nonbiological children - Father involvement with their children; - Use of sexual and reproductive health services; and - Attitudes about sex, childbearing, and marriage.'...The survey contains key religion variables that may relate to these topics. 'The survey results are used by the U.S. DHHS [Department of Health and Human Services] and other research and policy organizations to help to understand the use of health services and health education programs, and to do statistical studies on the topics listed above, among others.' ("https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nsfg/NSFG_2015_2017_UserGuide_MainText.pdf" Target="_blank">NSFG 2015-2017 User's Guide: Main Text) Each wave of the NSFG survey contains a Female Respondent Survey, Male Respondent Survey, and a Pregnancy Survey. This is the Female Respondent Survey.

  13. Association of IPV with postpartum contraceptive use, unadjusted and...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Dec 11, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Rashida-E Ijdi; Janine Barden-O’Fallon (2024). Association of IPV with postpartum contraceptive use, unadjusted and adjusted Logistic Regression Models [unweighted N = 165,204], PRAMS 2016–2021. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314938.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 11, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Rashida-E Ijdi; Janine Barden-O’Fallon
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Association of IPV with postpartum contraceptive use, unadjusted and adjusted Logistic Regression Models [unweighted N = 165,204], PRAMS 2016–2021.

  14. f

    Summary of key maternal death surveillance and response performance...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Dec 3, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Neamin Tesfay; Alemu Zenebe; Zewdnesh Dejene; Henok Tadesse; Fitsum Woldeyohannes; Araya Gebreyesus; Amit Arora (2024). Summary of key maternal death surveillance and response performance indicators in Ethiopia from 2014 to 2020. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312958.t008
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 3, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Neamin Tesfay; Alemu Zenebe; Zewdnesh Dejene; Henok Tadesse; Fitsum Woldeyohannes; Araya Gebreyesus; Amit Arora
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Ethiopia
    Description

    Summary of key maternal death surveillance and response performance indicators in Ethiopia from 2014 to 2020.

  15. i

    Demographic and Health Survey 2005-2006 - Zimbabwe

    • datacatalog.ihsn.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    • +1more
    Updated Mar 29, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Central Statistical Office (CSO) (2019). Demographic and Health Survey 2005-2006 - Zimbabwe [Dataset]. https://datacatalog.ihsn.org/catalog/2481
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 29, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Central Statistical Office (CSO)
    Time period covered
    2005 - 2006
    Area covered
    Zimbabwe
    Description

    Abstract

    The 2005-2006 Zimbabwe Demographic and Health Survey (2005-06 ZDHS) is one of a series of surveys undertaken by the Central Statistical Office (CSO) as part of the Zimbabwe National Household Survey Capability Programme (ZNHSCP) and the worldwide MEASURE DHS programme. The Ministry of Health and Child Welfare (MOH&CW), Zimbabwe National Family Planning Council (ZNFPC), and the Musasa Project contributed significantly to the design, implementation, and analysis of the 2005-06 ZDHS results. Financial support for the 2005-06 ZDHS was provided by the government of Zimbabwe, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DFID), the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), and the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The Demographic and Health Research Division of Macro International Inc. (Macro) provided technical assistance during all phases of the survey.

    While significantly expanded in content, the 2005-06 ZDHS is a follow-on to the 1988, 1994, and 1999 ZDHS and provides updated estimates of basic demographic and health indicators covered in the earlier surveys. In addition, data on malaria prevention and treatment, domestic violence, anaemia, and HIV/AIDS were also collected in the 2005-06 ZDHS. The primary objectives of the 2005-06 ZDHS project are to provide up-to-date information on fertility levels; nuptiality; sexual activity; fertility preferences; awareness and use of family planning methods; breastfeeding practices; nutritional status of mothers and young children; early childhood mortality and maternal mortality; maternal and child health; and awareness, behaviour, and prevalence regarding HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs).

    Geographic coverage

    National

    Analysis unit

    • Household
    • Children under five years
    • Women age 15-49
    • Men age 15-54

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data

    Sampling procedure

    The sample for the 2005-06 ZDHS was designed to provide population and health indicator estimates at the national and provincial levels. The sample design allowed for specific indicators, such as contraceptive use, to be calculated for each of the 10 provinces (Manicaland, Mashonaland Central, Mashonaland East, Mashonaland West, Matabeleland North, Matabeleland South, Midlands, Masvingo, Harare, and Bulawayo). The sampling frame used for the 2005-06 ZDHS was the 2002 Zimbabwe Master Sample (ZMS02) developed by CSO after the 2002 population census. With the exception of Harare and Bulawayo, each of the other eight provinces was stratified into four strata according to land use: communal lands, large-scale commercial farming areas (LSCFA), urban and semi-urban areas, smallscale commercial farming areas (SSCFA), and resettlement areas. Only one urban stratum was formed each for Harare and Bulawayo, providing a total of 34 strata.

    A representative probability sample of 10,800 households was selected for the 2005-06 ZDHS. The sample was selected in two stages with enumeration areas (EAs) as the first stage and households as the second stage sampling units. In total 1,200 EAs were selected with probability proportional to size (PPS), the size being the number of households enumerated in the 2002 census. The selection of the EAs was a systematic, one-stage operation carried out independently for each of the 34 strata. The 1,200 ZMS02 EAs were divided into three replicates of 400 EAs each. One of the replicates consisting of 400 EAs was used for the 2005-06 ZDHS. In the second stage, a complete listing of households and mapping exercise was carried out for each cluster in January 2005. The list of households obtained was used as the frame for the second stage random selection of households. The listing excluded people living in institutional households (army barracks, hospitals, police camps, boarding schools, etc.). CSO provincial supervisors also trained provincial CSO officers to use global positioning system (GPS) receivers to take the coordinates of the 2005-06 ZDHS sample clusters.

    All women age 15-49 and all men age 15-54 who were either permanent residents of the households in the 2005-06 ZDHS sample or visitors present in the household on the night before the survey were eligible to be interviewed. Anaemia and HIV testing was performed in each household among eligible women and men who consented to either or both tests. With the parent's or guardian's consent, children age 6-59 months were tested for anaemia in each household. In addition, a sub-sample of one eligible woman in each household was randomly selected to be asked additional questions about domestic violence.

    Note: See detailed sample implementation summary tables in Appendix A of the Final Report.

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]F

    Research instrument

    Three questionnaires were used for the 2005-06 ZDHS: a Household Questionnaire, a Women’s Questionnaire, and a Men’s Questionnaire. These questionnaires were adapted to reflect the population and health issues relevant to Zimbabwe at a series of meetings with various stakeholders from government ministries and agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and international donors. Three language versions of the questionnaires were produced: Shona, Ndebele, and English.

    The Household Questionnaire was used to list all the usual members and visitors of selected households. Some basic information was collected on the characteristics of each person listed, including his or her age, sex, education, and relationship to the head of the household. For children under age 18, survival status of the parents was determined. If a child in the household had a parent who was sick for more than three consecutive months in the 12 months preceding the survey or a parent who had died, additional questions related to support for orphans and vulnerable children were asked. Additionally, if an adult in the household was sick for more than three consecutive months in the 12 months preceding the survey or an adult in the household died, questions were asked related to support for sick people or people who have died. The Household Questionnaire was also used to identify women and men who were eligible for the individual interview. Additionally, the Household Questionnaire collected information on characteristics of the household’s dwelling unit, such as the source of water, type of toilet facilities, materials used for the floor of the house, ownership of various durable goods, and ownership and use of mosquito nets. The Household Questionnaire was also used to record height, weight, and haemoglobin measurements for children age 6-59 months.

    The Women’s Questionnaire was used to collect information from all women age 15-49. These women were asked questions on the following topics: - Background characteristics (education, residential history, media exposure, etc.) - Birth history and childhood mortality - Knowledge and use of family planning methods - Fertility preferences - Antenatal, delivery and postnatal care - Breastfeeding and infant feeding practices - Vaccinations and childhood illnesses - Marriage and sexual activity - Women’s work and husband’s background characteristics - Women’s and children’s nutritional status - Domestic violence - Awareness and behaviour regarding AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) - Adult mortality including maternal mortality.

    As in the 1999 ZDHS, a “calendar” was used in the 2005-06 ZDHS to collect information on the respondent’s reproductive history since January 2000 concerning contraceptive method use, sources of contraception, reasons for contraceptive discontinuation, and marital unions. In addition, interviewing teams measured the height and weight of all children under the age of five years and of all women age 15-49.

    The Men’s Questionnaire was administered to all men age 15-54 in each household in the 2005-06 ZDHS sample. The Men’s Questionnaire collected much of the same information found in the Women’s Questionnaire but was shorter because it did not contain a detailed reproductive history or questions on maternal and child health or nutrition.

    Response rate

    A total of 10,752 households were selected for the sample, of which 9,778 were currently occupied. The shortfall was largely due to some households no longer existing in the sampled clusters at the time of the interview. Of the 9,778 existing households, 9,285 were successfully interviewed, yielding a household response rate of 95 percent.

    In the interviewed households, 9,870 eligible women were identified and, of these, 8,907 were interviewed, yielding a response rate of 90 percent. Of the 8,761 eligible men identified, 7,175 were successfully interviewed (82 percent response rate). The principal reason for nonresponse among both eligible men and women was the failure to find them at home despite repeated visits to the households. The lower response rate among men than among women was due to the more frequent and longer absences of men from the households.

    Note: See summarized response rates in Table 1.3 of the Final Report.

    Sampling error estimates

    The estimates from a sample survey are affected by two types of errors: (1) non-sampling errors, and (2) sampling errors. Non-sampling errors are the results of mistakes made in implementing data collection and data processing, such as failure to locate and interview the correct household, misunderstanding of the questions on the part of either the interviewer or the respondent, and data

  16. f

    Mean () and standard error (SE) scores for the structure of the system among...

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Dec 3, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Neamin Tesfay; Alemu Zenebe; Zewdnesh Dejene; Henok Tadesse; Fitsum Woldeyohannes; Araya Gebreyesus; Amit Arora (2024). Mean () and standard error (SE) scores for the structure of the system among MDSR implementing health facilities in Ethiopia, 2020 (n = 400). [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312958.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 3, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Neamin Tesfay; Alemu Zenebe; Zewdnesh Dejene; Henok Tadesse; Fitsum Woldeyohannes; Araya Gebreyesus; Amit Arora
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Ethiopia
    Description

    Mean () and standard error (SE) scores for the structure of the system among MDSR implementing health facilities in Ethiopia, 2020 (n = 400).

  17. D

    Effects of Welding Fume Exposure on Human Placental Cells

    • data.cdc.gov
    • data.virginia.gov
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Nov 14, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2024). Effects of Welding Fume Exposure on Human Placental Cells [Dataset]. https://data.cdc.gov/National-Institute-for-Occupational-Safety-and-Hea/Effects-of-Welding-Fume-Exposure-on-Human-Placenta/h98p-htn6
    Explore at:
    application/rdfxml, application/rssxml, xml, tsv, csv, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 14, 2024
    Description

    As more women join the skilled-trade workforce, the effects of workplace exposures on pregnancy need to be explored. This study aimed to identify the effects of mild-steel (MS) and stainless-steel (SS) welding fume exposures on first-trimester placental trophoblast cells, using the HTR-8/SVneo cell line. MS is primarily composed of Iron (Fe) and Manganese (Mn), while SS also contains chromium (Cr) and nickel (Ni). We found that all three welding fumes had significant effects on cellular viability, and also caused increases in free radical production, while negatively affecting their invasive capabilities. MS was the only sample to cause an increase in production of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-8. Our results show that welding fume exposure is in fact cytotoxic to trophoblasts, and understanding how these occupational exposures could impact maternal and fetal health is necessary. Identifying how the varying combinations of heavy metals and other materials present in MS and SS welding fumes, along

  18. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
data.cdc.gov (2023). VSRR Provisional Maternal Death Counts and Rates [Dataset]. https://healthdata.gov/w/ehys-jtzp/default?cur=gU0o09p1SY-
Organization logo

VSRR Provisional Maternal Death Counts and Rates

Explore at:
tsv, csv, application/rssxml, application/rdfxml, xml, jsonAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Mar 17, 2023
Dataset provided by
data.cdc.gov
Description

This data presents national-level provisional maternal mortality rates based on a current flow of mortality and natality data in the National Vital Statistics System. Provisional rates which are an early estimate of the number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, are shown as of the date specified and may not include all deaths and births that occurred during a given time period (see Technical Notes).

A maternal death is the death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy irrespective of the duration and the site of the pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management, but not from accidental or incidental causes. In this data visualization, maternal deaths are those deaths with an underlying cause of death assigned to International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) code numbers A34, O00–O95, and O98–O99.

The provisional data include reported 12 month-ending provisional maternal mortality rates overall, by age, and by race and Hispanic origin. Provisional maternal mortality rates presented in this data visualization are for “12-month ending periods,” defined as the number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births occurring in the 12-month period ending in the month indicated. For example, the 12-month ending period in June 2020 would include deaths and births occurring from July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020. Evaluation of trends over time should compare estimates from year to year (June 2020 and June 2021), rather than month to month, to avoid overlapping time periods. In the visualization and in the accompanying data file, rates based on death counts less than 20 are suppressed in accordance with current NCHS standards of reliability for rates. Death counts between 1-9 in the data file are suppressed in accordance with National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) confidentiality standards.

Provisional data presented on this page will be updated on a quarterly basis as additional records are received. Previously released estimates are revised to include data and record updates received since the previous release. As a result, the reliability of estimates for a 12-month period ending with a specific month will improve with each quarterly release and estimates for previous time periods may change as new data and updates are received.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu