The number of smartphone users in the United States was forecast to continuously increase between 2024 and 2029 by in total 17.4 million users (+5.61 percent). After the fifteenth consecutive increasing year, the smartphone user base is estimated to reach 327.54 million users and therefore a new peak in 2029. Notably, the number of smartphone users of was continuously increasing over the past years.Smartphone users here are limited to internet users of any age using a smartphone. The shown figures have been derived from survey data that has been processed to estimate missing demographics.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to 150 countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).Find more key insights for the number of smartphone users in countries like Mexico and Canada.
The average time spent daily on a phone, not counting talking on the phone, has increased in recent years, reaching a total of * hours and ** minutes as of April 2022. This figure was expected to reach around * hours and ** minutes by 2024.
The Mozambique Population-Based Survey (PBS) provides a comprehensive assessment of the current status of agriculture and food security in two provinces, Zambizia and Nampula. These areas were selected based on national estimates that indicate that the incidence of poverty, malnutrition, and stunting among children less than five years of age is disproportionately high. These provinces are adjacent to three of the country's main trade corridors: Nacala (linking Mozambique to Malawi and Zambia), Beira (linking Mozambique to Zimbabwe), and the N1 (key North-South road connecting Nacala and Beira corridors). This spreadsheet describes the use of mobile phones and mobile banking.
Smallholders in rural Mozambique are typically characterized by low agricultural productivity, which is in part caused by very low levels of input usage. In the study area, four districts of Nampula province, farmers are generally far from towns where agricultural input providers are based and formal banking services are not available. Lacking these services, smallholders typically face liquidity constraints during the planting season when returns to input usage are the highest. In order to explore potential policy solutions to this challenge, the project combined training and incentives to use mobile money technology alongside targeted input marketing visits to promote formal saving strategies and increase take-up of basic inputs, primarily seeds, and fertilizer. The goal of the pilot project was to determine whether combining group-level trainings in mobile money technology with targeted direct marketing could increase input usage, and consequently boost agricultural productivity. In collaboration with Vodacom, IFPRI organized a series of trainings, first at the individual level with farm group leaders carried out in Nampula city in June 2014. This was followed by group trainings at local sites to which all farm group members were invited in July-August 2014. Input marketing visits were carried out by a local input provider, IKURU from October 2014-January 2015.
U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
The information presented in this data set is based on records of dockets, petitions, tower share requests, and notices of exempt modifications received and processed by the Council.
This database is not an exhaustive listing of all wireless telecommunications sites in the state in that it does not include all information about sites not under the jurisdiction of the Siting Council. The dataset includes a row for each Council action on any given facility.
Although the Connecticut Siting Council makes every effort to keep this spreadsheet current and accurate, the Council makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the data presented herein.
The public is advised that the records upon which the information in this database is based are kept in the Siting Council’s offices at Ten Franklin Square, New Britain and are open for public inspection during normal working hours from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday.
Note to Users: Over the years, some of the wireless companies have had several different corporate identities. In the database, they are identified by the name they had at the time of their application to the Siting Council. To help database users follow the name changes, the list below shows the different names by which the companies have been known. Recent mergers in the telecommunications industry have joined companies listed as separate entities. AT&T Wireless merged with Cingular to do business as New Cingular. Sprint and Nextel have merged to form Sprint/Nextel Corporation.
Cingular: SNET, SCLP, and New Cingular after merger with AT&T
T-Mobile: Omni (Omnipoint), VoiceStream
Verizon: BAM, Cellco
AT&T: AT&T Wireless, New Cingular after merger with Cingular, then Cingular rebranded as AT&T
Nextel: Smart SMR
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
SELECTED SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS IN THE UNITED STATES COMPUTERS AND INTERNET USE - DP02 Universe - Total households Survey-Program - American Community Survey 5-year estimates Years - 2020, 2021, 2022 The 2008 Broadband Improvement Act mandated the collection of data about computer and internet use. As a result, three questions were added to the 2013 American Community Survey (ACS) to measure these topics. The computer use question asked if anyone in the household owned or used a computer and included four response categories for a desktop or laptop, a smartphone, a tablet or other portable wireless computer, and some other type of computer. Respondents selected a checkbox for “Yes” or “No” for each response category. Respondents could select all categories that applied. Question asked if any member of the household has access to the internet. “Access” refers to whether or not someone in the household uses or can connect to the internet, regardless of whether or not they pay for the service. If a respondent answers “Yes, by paying a cell phone company or Internet service provider”, they are asked to select the type of internet service.
Various telecommunication datasets such as cellphone towers and service areas, land mobile station locations, AM, FM, and TV communication can be downloaded on an FCC page. Additionally, data files can be individually downloaded from the FCC Universal Licensing System data site. This data resource is intended to guide users toward the authoritative data source and to demonstrate at least one translation of that data into a spatial format.
The metadata for this translated dataset is here:
Antenna Structure Registration: antenna_structure_registration_mn.html
In addition, the Department of Homeland Security's Homeland Infrastructure Foundation - Level Data (HIFLD) program has an "Open Data" site, which includes a nationwide dataset on Cellular Towers derived from the FCC Universal Licensing System Database: https://hifld-geoplatform.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/cellular-towers
English(the United States) Scripted Monologue Smartphone speech dataset, collected from monologue based on given scripts, covering generic domain, human-machine interaction, smart home command and in-car command, numbers and other domains. Transcribed with text content and other attributes. Our dataset was collected from extensive and diversify speakers(1,842 American in total), geographicly speaking, enhancing model performance in real and complex tasks.Quality tested by various AI companies. We strictly adhere to data protection regulations and privacy standards, ensuring the maintenance of user privacy and legal rights throughout the data collection, storage, and usage processes, our datasets are all GDPR, CCPA, PIPL complied.
https://dataful.in/terms-and-conditionshttps://dataful.in/terms-and-conditions
The dataset contains state-, region- and gender-wise NSS 78th round compiled data on Percentage of Persons, in the age group of 15 years and above and 18 years and above, who have Exclusively used Mobile Telephones with an active Sim Card at least once in the last 3 months (preceding the date of NSO Survey)
Ziel dieser Studie war es, den Einfluss verschiedener Anreizsysteme auf die Bereitschaft zur Teilnahme an der passiven mobilen Datenerfassung unter deutschen Smartphone-Besitzern experimentell zu messen. Die Daten stammen aus einer Webumfrage unter deutschen Smartphone-Nutzern ab 18 Jahren, die aus einem deutschen, nicht wahrscheinlichen Online-Panel rekrutiert wurden. Im Dezember 2017 beantworteten 1.214 Teilnehmer einen Fragebogen zu den Themen Smartphone-Nutzung und -Fähigkeiten, Datenschutz und Sicherheit, allgemeine Einstellungen gegenüber der Umfrageforschung und Forschungseinrichtungen. Darüber hinaus enthielt der Fragebogen ein Experiment zur Bereitschaft, an der mobilen Datenerhebung unter verschiedenen Anreizbedingungen teilzunehmen. Themen: Besitz von Smartphone, Handy, Desktop- oder Laptop-Computer, Tablet-Computer und/oder E-Book-Reader; Art des Smartphones; Bereitschaft zur Teilnahme an der mobilen Datenerfassung unter verschiedenen Anreizbedingungen; Wahrscheinlichkeit des Herunterladens der App zur Teilnahme an dieser Forschungsstudie; Befragter möchte lieber an der Studie teilnehmen, wenn er 100 Euro erhalten könnte; Gesamtbetrag, den der Befragte für die Teilnahme an der Studie verdienen müsste (offene Antwort); Grund, warum der Befragte nicht an der Forschungsstudie teilnehmen würde; Bereitschaft zur Teilnahme an der Studie für einen Anreiz von insgesamt 60 Euro; Bereitschaft zur Aktivierung verschiedener Funktionen beim Herunterladen der App (Interaktionshistorie, Smartphone-Nutzung, Merkmale des sozialen Netzwerks, Netzqualitäts- und Standortinformationen, Aktivitätsdaten); vorherige Einladung zum Herunterladen der Forschungs-App; Herunterladen der Forschungs-App; Häufigkeit der Nutzung des Smartphones; Smartphone-Aktivitäten (Browsen, E-Mails, Fotografieren, Anzeigen/Post-Social-Media-Inhalte, Einkaufen, Online-Banking, Installieren von Apps, Verwenden von GPS-fähigen Apps, Verbinden über Bluethooth, Spielen, Streaming von Musik/Videos); Selbsteinschätzung der Kompetenz im Umgang mit dem Smartphone; Einstellung zu Umfragen und Teilnahme an Forschungsstudien (persönliches Interesse, Zeitverlust, Verkaufsgespräch, interessante Erfahrung, nützlich); Vertrauen in Institutionen zum Datenschutz (Marktforschungsunternehmen, Universitätsforscher, Regierungsbehörden wie das Statistische Bundesamt, Mobilfunkanbieter, App-Unternehmen, Kreditkartenunternehmen, Online-Händler und Social-Media-Plattformen); allgemeine Datenschutzbedenken; Gefühl der Datenschutzverletzung durch Banken und Kreditkartenunternehmen, Steuerbehörden, Regierungsbehörden, Marktforschung, soziale Netzwerke, Apps und Internetbrowser; Bedenken zur Datensicherheit bei Smartphone-Aktivitäten für Forschungszwecke (Online-Umfrage, Umfrage-Apps, Forschungs-Apps, SMS-Umfrage, Kamera, Aktivitätsdaten, GPS-Ortung, Bluetooth). Demographie: Geschlecht, Alter; Bundesland; höchster Schulabschluss; höchstes berufliches Bildungsniveau. Zusätzlich verkodet wurden: laufende Nummer; Dauer (Reaktionszeit in Sekunden); Gerätetyp, mit dem der Fragebogen ausgefüllt wurde. The goal of this study was to experimentally measure the influence of different incentive schemes on the willingness to participate in passive mobile data collection among German smartphone owners. The data come from a web survey among German smartphone users 18 years and older who were recruited from a German nonprobability online panel. In December 2017, 1,214 respondents completed a questionnaire on smartphone use and skills, privacy and security concerns, general attitudes towards survey research and research institutions. In addition, the questionnaire included an experiment on the willingness to participate in mobile data collection under different incentive conditions. Topics: Ownership of smartphone, cell phone, desktop or laptop computer, tablet computer, and/or e-book reader; type of smartphone; willingness to participate in mobile data collection under different incentive conditions; likelihood of downloading the app to particiapte in this research study; respondent would rather participate in the study if he could receive 100 euros; total amount to be earned for the respondent ot participate in the study (open answer); reason why the respondent wouldn´t participate in the research study; willlingness to participate in the study for an incentive of 60 euros in total; willingness to activate different functions when downloading the app (interaction history, smartphone usage, charateristics of the social network, network quality and location information, activity data); previous invitation for research app download; research app download; frequency of smartphone use; smartphone activities (browsing, e-mails, taking pictures, view/ post social media content, shopping, online banking, installing apps, using GPS-enabled apps, connecting via Bluethooth, playing games, stream music/ videos); self-assessment of smartphone skills; attitude towards surveys and participaton at research studies (personal interest, waste of time, sales pitch, interesting experience, useful); trust in institutions regarding data privacy (market research companies, university researchers, government authorities such as the Federal Statistical Office, mobile service provider, app companies, credit card companies, online retailer, and social media platforms); general privacy concern; feeling of privacy violation by banks and credit card companies, tax authorities, government agencies, market research, social networks, apps, and internet browsers; concern regarding data security with smartphone activities for research purposes (online survey, survey apps, research apps, SMS survey, camera, activity data, GPS location, Bluetooth). Demography: sex, age; federal state; highest level of school education; highest level of vocational education. Additionally coded was: running number; duration (response time in seconds); device type used to fill out the questionnaire.
Smallholders in rural Mozambique are typically characterized by low agricultural productivity, which is in part caused by very low levels of input usage. In the study area, four districts of Nampula province, farmers are generally far from towns where agricultural input providers are based and formal banking services are not available. Lacking these services, smallholders typically face liquidity constraints during the planting season when returns to input usage are the highest. In order to explore potential policy solutions to this challenge, the project combined training and incentives to use mobile money technology alongside targeted input marketing visits to promote formal saving strategies and increase take-up of basic inputs, primarily seeds, and fertilizer. The goal of the pilot project was to determine whether combining group-level trainings in mobile money technology with targeted direct marketing could increase input usage, and consequently boost agricultural productivity. In collaboration with Vodacom, IFPRI organized a series of trainings, first at the individual level with farm group leaders carried out in Nampula city in June 2014. This was followed by group trainings at local sites to which all farm group members were invited in July-August 2014. Input marketing visits were carried out by a local input provider, IKURU from October 2014-January 2015.
Quadrant provides Insightful, accurate, and reliable mobile location data.
Our privacy-first mobile location data unveils hidden patterns and opportunities, provides actionable insights, and fuels data-driven decision-making at the world's biggest companies.
These companies rely on our privacy-first Mobile Location and Points-of-Interest Data to unveil hidden patterns and opportunities, provide actionable insights, and fuel data-driven decision-making. They build better AI models, uncover business insights, and enable location-based services using our robust and reliable real-world data.
We conduct stringent evaluations on data providers to ensure authenticity and quality. Our proprietary algorithms detect, and cleanse corrupted and duplicated data points – allowing you to leverage our datasets rapidly with minimal processing or cleaning. During the ingestion process, our proprietary Data Filtering Algorithms remove events based on a number of both qualitative factors, as well as latency and other integrity variables to provide more efficient data delivery. The deduplicating algorithm focuses on a combination of four important attributes: Device ID, Latitude, Longitude, and Timestamp. This algorithm scours our data and identifies rows that contain the same combination of these four attributes. Post-identification, it retains a single copy and eliminates duplicate values to ensure our customers only receive complete and unique datasets.
We actively identify overlapping values at the provider level to determine the value each offers. Our data science team has developed a sophisticated overlap analysis model that helps us maintain a high-quality data feed by qualifying providers based on unique data values rather than volumes alone – measures that provide significant benefit to our end-use partners.
Quadrant mobility data contains all standard attributes such as Device ID, Latitude, Longitude, Timestamp, Horizontal Accuracy, and IP Address, and non-standard attributes such as Geohash and H3. In addition, we have historical data available back through 2022.
Through our in-house data science team, we offer sophisticated technical documentation, location data algorithms, and queries that help data buyers get a head start on their analyses. Our goal is to provide you with data that is “fit for purpose”.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Analysis of ‘National Adult Tobacco Survey - United States’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://www.kaggle.com/yamqwe/national-adult-tobacco-survey-natse on 28 January 2022.
--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---
2013-2014. The National Adult Tobacco Survey (NATS) was created to assess the prevalence of tobacco use, as well as the factors promoting and impeding tobacco use among adults. NATS also establishes a comprehensive framework for evaluating both the national and state-specific tobacco control programs. NATS was designed as a stratified, national, landline, and cell phone survey of non-institutionalized adults aged 18 years and older residing in the 50 states or D.C. It was developed to yield data representative and comparable at both national and state levels. The sample design also aims to provide national estimates for subgroups defined by gender, age, and race/ethnicity.
Source: https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/national-adult-tobacco-survey-nats
Last updated at https://catalog.data.gov/organization/hhs-gov : 2021-04-25This dataset was created by US Open Data Portal, data.gov and contains around 100 samples along with Locationdesc, Age, technical information and other features such as: - Topictypeid - Datasource - and more.
- Analyze Stratificationid4 in relation to Race
- Study the influence of Stratificationid1 on Low Confidence Limit
- More datasets
If you use this dataset in your research, please credit US Open Data Portal, data.gov
--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---
English(the United States) Spontaneous Dialogue Smartphone speech dataset, collected from dialogues based on given topics, covering generic domain. Transcribed with text content, speaker's ID, gender and other attributes. Our dataset was collected from extensive and diversify speakers(1,416 Americans), geographicly speaking, enhancing model performance in real and complex tasks. Quality tested by various AI companies. We strictly adhere to data protection regulations and privacy standards, ensuring the maintenance of user privacy and legal rights throughout the data collection, storage, and usage processes, our datasets are all GDPR, CCPA, PIPL complied.
Cellular Phone Towers dataset current as of 2007. Serve as base information for use in GIS systems for general planning, analytical, and research purposes..
Population density in 1990 within the boundaries of the Narragansett Bay watershed, the Southwest Coastal Ponds watershed, and the Little Narragansett Bay watershed. The methods for analyzing population were developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency ORD Atlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences Division in collaboration with the Narragansett Bay Estuary Program and other partners. Population rasters were generated using the USGS dasymetric mapping tool (see http://geography.wr.usgs.gov/science/dasymetric/index.htm) which uses land use data to distribute population data more accurately than simply within a census mapping unit. The 1990 10m cell population density raster was produced using Rhode Island 1988 state land use data, Massachusetts 1985 state land use, Connecticut 1992 NLCD land use data, and U.S. Census data (1990). To generate a population estimate (number of persons) for any given area within the boundaries of this raster, use the Zonal Statistics as Table tool to sum the 10m cell density values within your zone dataset (e.g., watershed polygon layer). For more information, please reference the 2017 State of Narragansett Bay & Its Watershed Technical Report (nbep.org).
LISTOS_SurfaceMobile_InSitu_Data is the Long Island Sound Tropospheric Ozone Study (LISTOS) surface mobile data collected via mobile platforms during the LISTOS field campaign. This product is a result of a joint effort across multiple agencies, including NASA, NOAA, the EPA Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM), Maine Department of Environmental Protection, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and several research groups at universities. This product features data collected by the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (CT DEEP) special purpose mobile monitor located on the Park City ferry on Long Island Sound and other mobile platforms. Data collection is complete.The New York City (NYC) metropolitan area (comprised of portions of New Jersey, New York, and Connecticut in and around NYC) is home to over 20 million people, but also millions of people living downwind in neighboring states. This area continues to persistently have challenges meeting past and recently revised federal health-based air quality standards for ground-level ozone, which impacts the health and well-being of residents living in the area. A unique feature of this chronic ozone problem is the pollution transported in a northeast direction out of NYC over Long Island Sound. The relatively cool waters of Long Island Sound confine the pollutants in a shallow and stable marine boundary layer. Afternoon heating over coastal land creates a sea breeze that carries the air pollution inland from the confined marine layer, resulting in high ozone concentrations in Connecticut and, at times, farther east into Rhode Island and Massachusetts. To investigate the evolving nature of ozone formation and transport in the NYC region and downwind, Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM) launched the Long Island Sound Tropospheric Ozone Study (LISTOS). LISTOS was a multi-agency collaborative study focusing on Long Island Sound and the surrounding coastlines that continually suffer from poor air quality exacerbated by land/water circulation. The primary measurement observations took place between June-September 2018 and include in-situ and remote sensing instrumentation that were integrated aboard three aircraft, a network of ground sites, mobile vehicles, boat measurements, and ozonesondes. The goal of LISTOS was to improve the understanding of ozone chemistry and sea breeze transported pollution over Long Island Sound and its coastlines. LISTOS also provided NASA the opportunity to test air quality remote sensing retrievals with the use of its airborne simulators (GEOstationary Coastal and Air Pollution Events (GEO-CAPE) Airborne Simulator (GCAS), and Geostationary Trace gas and Aerosol Sensory Optimization (GeoTASO)) for the preparation of the Tropospheric Emissions; Monitoring of Pollution (TEMPO) observations for monitoring air quality from space. LISTOS also helped collaborators in the validation of Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) science products, with use of airborne- and ground-based measurements of ozone, NO2, and HCHO.
The dataset contains contact and description information for local supply chain organizations, offshore wind developers, and original equipment manufacturers that provide goods and services to support New York State’s offshore wind industry. To request placement in this database, or to update your company’s information, please visit NYSERDA’s Supply Chain Database webpage at https://www.nyserda.ny.gov/All-Programs/Offshore-Wind/Focus-Areas/Supply-Chain-Economic-Development/Supply-Chain-Database to submit a request form.
How does your organization use this dataset? What other NYSERDA or energy-related datasets would you like to see on Open NY? Let us know by emailing OpenNY@nyserda.ny.gov.
The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) offers objective information and analysis, innovative programs, technical expertise, and support to help New Yorkers increase energy efficiency, save money, use renewable energy, and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. To learn more about NYSERDA’s programs, visit https://nyserda.ny.gov or follow us on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, or Instagram.
By Health Data New York [source]
This dataset provides comprehensive measures to evaluate the quality of medical services provided to Medicaid beneficiaries by Health Homes, including the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Core Set and Health Home State Plan Amendment (SPA). This allows us to gain insight into how well these health homes are performing in terms of delivering high-quality care. Our data sources include the Medicaid Data Mart, QARR Member Level Files, and New York State Delivery System Inform Incentive Program (DSRIP) Data Warehouse. With this data set you can explore essential indicators such as rates for indicators within scope of Core Set Measures, sub domains, domains and measure descriptions; age categories used; denominators of each measure; level of significance for each indicator; and more! By understanding more about Health Home Quality Measures from this resource you can help make informed decisions about evidence based health practices while also promoting better patient outcomes
For more datasets, click here.
- 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!
This dataset contains measures that evaluate the quality of care delivered by Health Homes for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). With this dataset, you can get an overview of how a health home is performing in terms of quality. You can use this data to compare different health homes and their respective service offerings.
The data used to create this dataset was collected from Medicaid Data Mart, QARR Member Level Files, and New York State Delivery System Incentive Program (DSRIP) Data Warehouse sources.
In order to use this dataset effectively, you should start by looking at the columns provided. These include: Measurement Year; Health Home Name; Domain; Sub Domain; Measure Description; Age Category; Denominator; Rate; Level of Significance; Indicator. Each column provides valuable insight into how a particular health home is performing in various measurements of healthcare quality.
When examining this data, it is important to remember that many variables are included in any given measure and that changes may have occurred over time due to varying factors such as population or financial resources available for healthcare delivery. Furthermore, changes in policy may also affect performance over time so it is important to take these things into account when evaluating the performance of any given health home from one year to the next or when comparing different health homes on a specific measure or set of indicators over time
- Using this dataset, state governments can evaluate the effectiveness of their health home programs by comparing the performance across different domains and subdomains.
- Healthcare providers and organizations can use this data to identify areas for improvement in quality of care provided by health homes and strategies to reduce disparities between individuals receiving care from health homes.
- Researchers can use this dataset to analyze how variations in cultural context, geography, demographics or other factors impact delivery of quality health home services across different locations
If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source
See the dataset description for more information.
File: health-home-quality-measures-beginning-2013-1.csv | Column name | Description | |:--------------------------|:----------------------------------------------------| | Measurement Year | The year in which the data was collected. (Integer) | | Health Home Name | The name of the health home. (String) | | Domain | The domain of the measure. (String) | | Sub Domain | The sub domain of the measure. (String) | | Measure Description | A description of the measure. (String) | | Age Category | The age category of the patient. (String) | | Denominator | The denominator of the measure. (Integer) | | Rate | The rate of the measure. (Float) | | Level of Significance | The level of significance of the measure. (String) | | Indicator | The indicator of the measure. (String) |
...
Overview: The QuitNowTXT text messaging program is designed as a resource that can be adapted to specific contexts including those outside the United States and in languages other than English. Based on evidence-based practices, this program is a smoking cessation intervention for smokers who are ready to quit smoking. Although evidence supports the use of text messaging as a platform to deliver cessation interventions, it is expected that the maximum effect of the program will be demonstrated when it is integrated into other elements of a national tobacco control strategy. The QuitNowTXT program is designed to deliver tips, motivation, encouragement and fact-based information via unidirectional and interactive bidirectional message formats. The core of the program consists of messages sent to the user based on a scheduled quit day identified by the user. Messages are sent for up to four weeks pre-quit date and up to six weeks post quit date. Messages assessing mood, craving, and smoking status are also sent at various intervals, and the user receives messages back based on the response they have submitted. In addition, users can request assistance in dealing with craving, stress/mood, and responding to slips/relapses by texting specific key words to the QuitNow. Rotating automated messages are then returned to the user based on the keyword. Details of the program are provided below. Texting STOP to the service discontinues further texts being sent. This option is provided every few messages as required by the United States cell phone providers. It is not an option to remove this feature if the program is used within the US. If a web-based registration is used, it is suggested that users provide demographic information such as age, sex, and smoking frequency (daily or almost every day, most days, only a few days a week, only on weekends, a few times a month or less) in addition to their mobile phone number and quit date. This information will be useful for assessing the reach of the program, as well as identifying possible need to develop libraries to specific groups. The use of only a mobile phone-based registration system reduces barriers for participant entry into the program but limits the collection of additional data. At bare minimum, quit date must be collected. At sign up, participants will have the option to choose a quit date up to one month out. Text messages will start up to 14 days before their specified quit date. Users also have the option of changing their quit date at any time if desired. The program can also be modified to provide texts to users who have already quit within the last month. One possible adaptation of the program is to include a QuitNowTXT "light" version. This adaptation would allow individuals who do not have unlimited text messaging capabilities but would still like to receive support to participate by controlling the number of messages they receive. In the light program, users can text any of the programmed keywords without fully opting in to the program. Program Design: The program is designed as a 14-day countdown to quit date, with subsequent six weeks of daily messages. Each day within the program is identified as either a pre-quit date (Q- # days) or a post-quit date (Q+#). If a user opts into the program fewer than 14 days before their quit date, the system will begin sending messages on that day. For example, if they opt in four days prior to their quit date, the system will send a welcome message and recognize that they are at Q-4 (or four days before their quit date), and they will receive the message that everyone else receives four days before their quit date. As the user progresses throughout the program, they will receive messages outlined in the text message library. Throughout the program, users will receive texts that cover a variety of content areas including tips, informational content, motivational messaging, and keyword responses. The frequency of messages incre
The number of smartphone users in the United States was forecast to continuously increase between 2024 and 2029 by in total 17.4 million users (+5.61 percent). After the fifteenth consecutive increasing year, the smartphone user base is estimated to reach 327.54 million users and therefore a new peak in 2029. Notably, the number of smartphone users of was continuously increasing over the past years.Smartphone users here are limited to internet users of any age using a smartphone. The shown figures have been derived from survey data that has been processed to estimate missing demographics.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to 150 countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).Find more key insights for the number of smartphone users in countries like Mexico and Canada.