96 datasets found
  1. Address Ranges

    • hifld-geoplatform.hub.arcgis.com
    • azgeo-data-hub-agic.hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Aug 30, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    GeoPlatform ArcGIS Online (2024). Address Ranges [Dataset]. https://hifld-geoplatform.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/address-ranges/explore
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 30, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    https://arcgis.com/
    Authors
    GeoPlatform ArcGIS Online
    Description

    Address ranges describe a label given to a unique collection of addresses that fall along a road or path. Address ranges provide a way of locating homes and businesses based on their street addresses when no other location information is available.Using a house number, street name, street side and ZIP code, address ranges can locate the address to the geographic area associated to that side of the street. Once geocoded, the U.S. Census Bureau can assign the address to a field assignment area or tabulate the data for that address. In addition, academics, researchers, professionals and government agencies outside of the Census Bureau use MAF/TIGER address ranges to transform tabular addresses into geographical datasets for decision-making and analytical purposes.Address ranges must be unique to geocode addresses to the correct location and avoid geocoding conflicts. Multiple elements in MAF/TIGER are required to make an address range unique including street names, address house numbers and street feature geometries, such as street centerlines. The address range data model is designed to maximize geocoding matches with their correct geographic areas in MAF/TIGER by allowing an unlimited number of address range-to-street feature relationships.The Census Bureau’s Geography Division devises numerous operations and processes to build and maintain high quality address ranges so that:Address ranges accurately describe the location of addresses on the ground.Address All possible city-style addresses are geocoded.Address ranges can handle all known address and street name variations.Address ranges conform with current U.S. Postal Service ZIP codes.Address ranges are reliable and free from conflicts.Automated software continually updates existing address ranges, builds new address ranges and corrects errors. An automated operation links address location points and tabular address information to street feature edges with matching street names in the same block to build and modify address ranges.Many business rules and legal value checks ensure quality address range data in MAF/TIGER. For example, business rules prevent adding or modifying address ranges that overlap another house number range with the same street name and ZIP code. Legal value checks verify that address ranges include mandatory attribute information, valid data types and valid character values.Some of the TIGER/Line products for the public include address ranges and give the public the ability to geocode addresses to MAF/TIGER address ranges for the user’s own purpose. The address range files are available for the nation, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Island Areas at the county level. TIGER/Line files require geographic information system (GIS) software to use.The Census Bureau Geocoder Service is a web service provided to the public. The service accepts up to 1,000 input addresses and, based on Census address ranges, returns the interpolated geocoded location and census geographies. Users can access the service a web interface or a representational state transfer (REST) application program interface (API) web service. See the Census Geocoder for more information on this process. Directions on how to use the Census Geocoder available: Geocoding Services Web Application Programming Interface (API)Download: https://www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TGRGDB24/tlgdb_2024_a_us_addr.gdb.zip

  2. d

    Geocoded Medicaid office locations in the United States

    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Mar 6, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Shafer, Paul; Palmer, Maxwell; Cho, Ahyoung; Lynch, Mara; Louis, Pierce; Skinner, Alexandra (2024). Geocoded Medicaid office locations in the United States [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AVRHMI
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 6, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Shafer, Paul; Palmer, Maxwell; Cho, Ahyoung; Lynch, Mara; Louis, Pierce; Skinner, Alexandra
    Time period covered
    Aug 1, 2023 - Dec 19, 2023
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Big “p” policy changes at the state and federal level are certainly important to health equity, such as eligibility for and generosity of Medicaid benefits. Medicaid expansion has significantly expanded the number of people who are eligible for Medicaid and the creation of the health insurance exchanges (Marketplace) under the Affordable Care Act created a very visible avenue through which people can learn that they are eligible. Although many applications are now submitted online, physical access to state, county, and tribal government Medicaid offices still plays a critical role in understanding eligibility, getting help in applying, and navigating required documentation for both initial enrollment and redetermination of eligibility. However, as more government functions have moved online, in-person office locations and/or staff may have been cut to reduce costs, and gentrification has shifted where minoritized, marginalized, and/or low-income populations live, it is unclear if this key local connection point between residents and Medicaid has been maintained. Our objective was to identify and geocode all Medicaid offices in the United States for pairing with other spatial data (e.g., demographics, Medicaid participation, health care use, health outcomes) to investigate policy-relevant research questions. Three coders identified Medicaid office addresses in all 50 states and the District of Columbia by searching state government websites (e.g., Department of Health and Human Services or analogous state agency) during late 2021 and early 2022 for the appropriate Medicaid agency and its office locations, which were then reviewed for accuracy by a fourth coder. Our corpus of Medicaid office addresses was then geocoded using the Census Geocoder from the US Census Bureau (https://geocoding.geo.census.gov/geocoder/) with unresolved addresses investigated and/or manually geocoded using Google Maps. The corpus was updated in August through December 2023 following the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency by a fifth coder as several states closed and/or combined offices during the pandemic. After deduplication (e.g., where multiple counties share a single office) and removal of mailing addresses (e.g., PO Boxes), our dataset includes 3,027 Medicaid office locations. 1 (December 19, 2023) – original version 2 (January 25, 2024) – added related publication (Data in Brief), corrected two records that were missing negative signs in longitude 3 (February 6, 2024) – corrected latitude and longitude for one office (1340 State Route 9, Lake George, NY 12845) 4 (March 4, 2024) – added one office for Vermont after contacting relevant state agency (280 State Road, Waterbury, VT 05671)

  3. s

    Citation Trends for "On the Validity of Using Census Geocode Characteristics...

    • shibatadb.com
    Updated Jun 15, 1996
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Yubetsu (1996). Citation Trends for "On the Validity of Using Census Geocode Characteristics to Proxy Individual Socioeconomic Characteristics" [Dataset]. https://www.shibatadb.com/article/3EFWmgi9
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 15, 1996
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Yubetsu
    License

    https://www.shibatadb.com/license/data/proprietary/v1.0/license.txthttps://www.shibatadb.com/license/data/proprietary/v1.0/license.txt

    Time period covered
    1997 - 2025
    Variables measured
    New Citations per Year
    Description

    Yearly citation counts for the publication titled "On the Validity of Using Census Geocode Characteristics to Proxy Individual Socioeconomic Characteristics".

  4. d

    Postal Code Conversion File [Canada], June 2017, Census of Canada 2016

    • search.dataone.org
    • borealisdata.ca
    Updated Dec 18, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statistics Canada. Geography Division (2024). Postal Code Conversion File [Canada], June 2017, Census of Canada 2016 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/G86G3N
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 18, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Borealis
    Authors
    Statistics Canada. Geography Division
    Area covered
    Canada
    Description

    The Postal Code Conversion File (PCCF) is a digital file which provides a correspondence between the Canada Post Corporation (CPC) six-character postal code and Statistics Canada's standard geographic areas for which census data and other statistics are produced. Through the link between postal codes and standard geographic areas, the PCCF permits the integration of data from various sources. The Single Link Indicator provides one best link for every postal code, as there are multiple records for many postal codes. To obtain the postal code conversion file or for questions, consult the DLI contact at your educational institution. The geographic coordinates attached to each postal code on the PCCF are commonly used to map the distribution of data for spatial analysis (e.g., clients, activities). The location information is a powerful tool for planning, or research purposes. The geographic coordinates, which represent the standard geostatistical areas linked to each postal codeOM on the PCCF, are commonly used to map the distribution of data for spatial analysis (e.g., clients, activities). The location information is a powerful tool for marketing, planning, or research purposes. In April 1983, the Statistical Registers and Geography Division released the first version of the PCCF, which linked postal codesOM to 1981 Census geographic areas and included geographic coordinates. Since then, the file has been updated on a regular basis to reflect changes. For this release of the PCCF, the vast majority of the postal codesOM are directly geocoded to 2016 Census geography while others are linked via various conversion processes. A quality indicator for the confidence of this linkage is available in the PCCF.

  5. TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2020, County, Gwinnett County, GA, Topological Faces...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • datasets.ai
    • +1more
    Updated Jan 28, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Spatial Data Collection and Products Branch (Point of Contact) (2024). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2020, County, Gwinnett County, GA, Topological Faces (Polygons With All Geocodes) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2020-county-gwinnett-county-ga-topological-faces-polygons-with-all-geocode
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 28, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
    Area covered
    Gwinnett County, Georgia
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Face refers to the areal (polygon) topological primitives that make up MTDB. A face is bounded by one or more edges; its boundary includes only the edges that separate it from other faces, not any interior edges contained within the area of the face. The Topological Faces Shapefile contains the attributes of each topological primitive face. Each face has a unique topological face identifier (TFID) value. Each face in the shapefile includes the key geographic area codes for all geographic areas for which the Census Bureau tabulates data for both the 2020 Census and the annual estimates and surveys. The geometries of each of these geographic areas can then be built by dissolving the face geometries on the appropriate key geographic area codes in the Topological Faces Shapefile.

  6. d

    Postal Code Conversion File [Canada], November 2020, Census of Canada 2016

    • search.dataone.org
    • borealisdata.ca
    • +1more
    Updated Dec 11, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statistics Canada (2024). Postal Code Conversion File [Canada], November 2020, Census of Canada 2016 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/ULVZKO
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 11, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Borealis
    Authors
    Statistics Canada
    Area covered
    Canada
    Description

    The Postal Code Conversion File (PCCF) is a digital file which provides a correspondence between the Canada Post Corporation (CPC) six-character postal code and Statistics Canada's standard geographic areas for which census data and other statistics are produced. Through the link between postal codes and standard geographic areas, the PCCF permits the integration of data from various sources. The Single Link Indicator provides one best link for every postal code, as there are multiple records for many postal codes. Getting started guide To obtain the postal code conversion file or for questions, consult the DLI contact at your educational institution. The geographic coordinates attached to each postal code on the PCCF are commonly used to map the distribution of data for spatial analysis (e.g., clients, activities). The location information is a powerful tool for planning, or research purposes. The geographic coordinates, which represent the standard geostatistical areas linked to each postal codeOM on the PCCF, are commonly used to map the distribution of data for spatial analysis (e.g., clients, activities). The location information is a powerful tool for marketing, planning, or research purposes. In April 1983, the Statistical Registers and Geography Division released the first version of the PCCF, which linked postal codesOM to 1981 Census geographic areas and included geographic coordinates. Since then, the file has been updated on a regular basis to reflect changes. For this release of the PCCF, the vast majority of the postal codesOM are directly geocoded to 2016 Census geography while others are linked via various conversion processes. A quality indicator for the confidence of this linkage is available in the PCCF.

  7. v

    COVID-19 Vaccinations by Census Tract - ARCHIVED

    • res1catalogd-o-tdatad-o-tgov.vcapture.xyz
    • data.ct.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Jul 5, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data.ct.gov (2025). COVID-19 Vaccinations by Census Tract - ARCHIVED [Dataset]. https://res1catalogd-o-tdatad-o-tgov.vcapture.xyz/dataset/covid-19-vaccinations-by-census-tract-3a35f
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 5, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    data.ct.gov
    Description

    NOTE: As of 2/16/2023, this page is not being updated. For data on updated (bivalent) COVID-19 booster vaccination click here: https://res1appd-o-tpowerbigovd-o-tus.vcapture.xyz/view?r=eyJrIjoiODNhYzVkNGYtMzZkMy00YzA3LWJhYzUtYTVkOWFlZjllYTVjIiwidCI6IjExOGI3Y2ZhLWEzZGQtNDhiOS1iMDI2LTMxZmY2OWJiNzM4YiJ9 This table shows the number and percent of people that have initiated COVID-19 vaccination and are fully vaccinated by CT census tract (including residents of all ages). It also shows the number of people who have not received vaccine and who are not yet fully vaccinated. All data in this report are preliminary; data for previous dates will be updated as new reports are received and data errors are corrected. A person who has received at least one dose of any vaccine is considered to have initiated vaccination. A person is considered fully vaccinated if they have completed a primary series by receiving 2 doses of the Pfizer, Novavax or Moderna vaccines or 1 dose of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. The fully vaccinated are a subset of the number who have received at least one dose. The percent with at least one dose many be over-estimated and the percent fully vaccinated may be under-estimated because of vaccine administration records for individuals that cannot be linked because of differences in how names or date of birth are reported. Population data obtained from the 2019 Census ACS (www.census.gov) Geocoding is used to determine the census tract in which a person lives. People for who a census tract cannot be determined based on available address data are not included in this table. DPH recommends that these data are primarily used to identify areas that require additional attention rather than to establish and track the exact level of vaccine coverage. Census tract coverage estimates can play an important role in planning and evaluating vaccination strategies. However, inaccuracies in the data that are inherent to population surveillance may be magnified when analyses are performed down to the census tract level. We make every effort to provide accurate data, but inaccuracies may result from things like incomplete or inaccurate addresses, duplicate records, and sampling error in the American Community Survey that is used to estimate census tract population size and composition. These things may result in overestimates or underestimates of vaccine coverage. Some census tracts are suppressed. This is done if the number of people vaccinated is less than 5 or if the census population estimate is considered unreliable (coefficient of variance > 30%). Coverage estimates over 100% are shown as 100%. Connecticut COVID-19 Vaccine Program providers are required to report information on all COVID-19 vaccine doses administered to CT WiZ, the Connecticut Immunization Information System. Data on doses administered to CT residents out-of-state are being added to CT WiZ jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction. Doses administered by some Federal entities (including Department of Defense, Department of Correction, Department of Veteran’s Affairs, Indian Health Service) are not yet reported to CT WiZ. Data reported here reflect the vaccination records currently reported to CT WiZ. Caution should be used when interpreting coverage estimates in towns with large college/university populations since coverage may be underestimated. In the census, college/university students who live on or just off campus would be counted in the college/university town. However, if a student was vaccinated while studying remotely in his/her hometown, the student may be counted as a vaccine recipient in that town. As part of continuous data quality improvement efforts, duplicate records were removed from the COVID-19 vaccination data during the weeks of 4/19/2021 and 4/26/2021. As of 1/13/2021, census tract level data are provider by town for all ages. Data by age group is no longer available.

  8. TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2020, County, Johnston County, NC, Topological Faces...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • s.cnmilf.com
    Updated Jan 28, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Spatial Data Collection and Products Branch (Point of Contact) (2024). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2020, County, Johnston County, NC, Topological Faces (Polygons With All Geocodes) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2020-county-johnston-county-nc-topological-faces-polygons-with-all-geocode
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 28, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
    Area covered
    Johnston County, North Carolina
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Face refers to the areal (polygon) topological primitives that make up MTDB. A face is bounded by one or more edges; its boundary includes only the edges that separate it from other faces, not any interior edges contained within the area of the face. The Topological Faces Shapefile contains the attributes of each topological primitive face. Each face has a unique topological face identifier (TFID) value. Each face in the shapefile includes the key geographic area codes for all geographic areas for which the Census Bureau tabulates data for both the 2020 Census and the annual estimates and surveys. The geometries of each of these geographic areas can then be built by dissolving the face geometries on the appropriate key geographic area codes in the Topological Faces Shapefile.

  9. g

    Geocoded data from the census of licences and clubs from sports federations...

    • gimi9.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Geocoded data from the census of licences and clubs from sports federations approved by the Ministry responsible for sports | gimi9.com [Dataset]. https://gimi9.com/dataset/eu_53699ebba3a729239d205f58
    Explore at:
    License

    Licence Ouverte / Open Licence 1.0https://www.etalab.gouv.fr/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Open_Licence.pdf
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The annual inventory of licences from sports federations approved by the Ministry responsible for sports makes it possible to measure the level and evolution over time of supervised sports practice. These statistics shed light on public policies for the development of sport, both at national and territorial level. This is a census at the person's place of residence and not at the place of practice. The data from the census are then geocoded by INSEE for metropolis + DROM (excluding Mayotte), in order to be able to communicate these files at the municipal level. Data are not available for all federations. A number of them did not have fully geolocatable data to the municipality allowing exhaustive exploitation. The geocoded data have therefore been processed in order to be able to provide a estimate of the number of licences per municipality and federation. The data for vintage N correspond to season N-1/N or calendar year N depending on the functioning of the federations (e.g. lic-data-2021 is a distribution of licenses for the 2020/2021 season or the year 2021). The 2019 data have been revised (2nd geocoding operation required). From 2019, some changes have been made in the files transmitted: -Common precision level-QPV and no longer common -Age steps of the licence census and not of the five-year census -Population data not included in the file -Distinction of out-of-field data (Mayotte, Monaco, COM, Foreign) vs. undistributed data -Data for the municipalities of Mayotte not included (excluding geocoding) -Addition of licenses not distributed in the file (sum of licenses corresponds to the result of the census) -The distribution for 3 federations is limited to the department level (FF Maccabi, FS of the National Police, F of the defense clubs)

  10. TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2022, County, Tazewell County, IL, Topological Faces...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • datasets.ai
    Updated Jan 28, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Spatial Data Collection and Products Branch (Point of Contact) (2024). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2022, County, Tazewell County, IL, Topological Faces (Polygons With All Geocodes) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2022-county-tazewell-county-il-topological-faces-polygons-with-all-geocode
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 28, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
    Area covered
    Illinois, Tazewell County
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Face refers to the areal (polygon) topological primitives that make up MTDB. A face is bounded by one or more edges; its boundary includes only the edges that separate it from other faces, not any interior edges contained within the area of the face. The Topological Faces Shapefile contains the attributes of each topological primitive face. Each face has a unique topological face identifier (TFID) value. Each face in the shapefile includes the key geographic area codes for all geographic areas for which the Census Bureau tabulates data for both the 2020 Census and the annual estimates and surveys. The geometries of each of these geographic areas can then be built by dissolving the face geometries on the appropriate key geographic area codes in the Topological Faces Shapefile.

  11. Y

    Citation Network Graph

    • shibatadb.com
    Updated Jun 15, 1996
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Yubetsu (1996). Citation Network Graph [Dataset]. https://www.shibatadb.com/article/3EFWmgi9
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 15, 1996
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Yubetsu
    License

    https://www.shibatadb.com/license/data/proprietary/v1.0/license.txthttps://www.shibatadb.com/license/data/proprietary/v1.0/license.txt

    Description

    Network of 44 papers and 62 citation links related to "On the Validity of Using Census Geocode Characteristics to Proxy Individual Socioeconomic Characteristics".

  12. d

    Postal Code Conversion File [Canada], July 1996, Census of Canada 1991

    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Dec 18, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statistics Canada. Geography Division (2024). Postal Code Conversion File [Canada], July 1996, Census of Canada 1991 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/XSKDEW
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 18, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Borealis
    Authors
    Statistics Canada. Geography Division
    Description

    The Postal Code Conversion File (PCCF) is a digital file which provides the correspondence between the six character code and Statistics Canada's standard geographical areas (e.g. Census divisions, Census subdivisions, Federal Electoral Districts) for which census data and other statistics are produced. To obtain the postal code conversion file or for questions, consult the DLI contact at your educational institution. The current version of the PCCF links over 787,000 postal code records, created up to the end of July 1996, to the geographical areas used in the 1991 Census and to Universal Transverse Mercator System (UTM) coordinates and latitude/longitude coordinates. This new version contains a new field called the single postal code indicator. This field will be useful in cases where a given postal code is assigned to multiple standard geographic areas. It indicates which of the standard geographic units is the most representative of the postal code. The purpose of the PCCF is to provide linkage capabilities that can be used for numerous applications, such as market research, demographic studies and geocoding applications. The file allows users to cross-reference geographic coordinates, census areas, and user-defined areas. For example, one of its key strengths lied in its capacity to integrate census data with user data. For more information on this product or some of its applications, please refer to the 'Products and Services Manual' or contact the Regional Geographer at one of our Regional Reference Centres across Canada. During the 1970s, there was an increasing demand for a large variety of statistics for small areas. To aggregate data by geographic areas, different types of address elements were examined manually, or by computer, in order to properly assign a geographical code. This assignment was complicated by the great variety of address formats on data files and spelling variations in street names. The introduction of the postal code in the mid-1970s has led to an entirely new approach. The postal code could be used as a structured representation of a range of mailing addresses. If the postal codes were matched to a standard geographic unit once, and the results retained in a lookup table, then the complex task of structuring and matching addresses could be avoided.

  13. o

    Data from: The Census Place Project: A Method for Geolocating Unstructured...

    • openicpsr.org
    delimited
    Updated Sep 6, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Enrico Berkes; Ezra Karger; Peter Nencka (2022). The Census Place Project: A Method for Geolocating Unstructured Place Names [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/E179401V2
    Explore at:
    delimitedAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 6, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Chicago Federal Reserve Bank
    Miami University
    Ohio State University
    Authors
    Enrico Berkes; Ezra Karger; Peter Nencka
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Researchers use microdata to study the economic development of the United States and the causal effects of historical policies. Much of this research focuses on county- and state-level patterns and policies because comprehensive sub-county data is not consistently available. We describe a new method that geocodes and standardizes the towns and cities of residence for individuals and households in decennial census microdata from 1790--1940. We release public crosswalks linking individuals and households to consistently-defined place names, longitude-latitude pairs, counties, and states. Our method dramatically increases the number of individuals and households assigned to a sub-county location relative to standard publicly available data: we geocode an average of 83% of the individuals and households in 1790--1940 census microdata, compared to 23% in widely-used crosswalks. In years with individual-level microdata (1850--1940), our average match rate is 94% relative to 33% in widely-used crosswalks. To illustrate the value of our crosswalks, we measure place-level population growth across the United States between 1870 and 1940 at a sub-county level, confirming predictions of Zipf's Law and Gibrat's Law for large cities but rejecting similar predictions for small towns. We describe how our approach can be used to accurately geocode other historical datasets.

  14. f

    Real enumeration district (ED) overlap with virtual enumeration districts.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jan 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Shuo Jim Huang; Michel Boudreaux; Kellee White Whilby; Rozalina G. McCoy; Neil Jay Sehgal (2025). Real enumeration district (ED) overlap with virtual enumeration districts. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004067.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 15, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS Global Public Health
    Authors
    Shuo Jim Huang; Michel Boudreaux; Kellee White Whilby; Rozalina G. McCoy; Neil Jay Sehgal
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Real enumeration district (ED) overlap with virtual enumeration districts.

  15. TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2020, County, St. Louis County, MO, Topological Faces...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • datasets.ai
    • +1more
    Updated Jan 28, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Spatial Data Collection and Products Branch (Point of Contact) (2024). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2020, County, St. Louis County, MO, Topological Faces (Polygons With All Geocodes) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2020-county-st-louis-county-mo-topological-faces-polygons-with-all-geocode
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 28, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
    Area covered
    St. Louis County, Missouri
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Face refers to the areal (polygon) topological primitives that make up MTDB. A face is bounded by one or more edges; its boundary includes only the edges that separate it from other faces, not any interior edges contained within the area of the face. The Topological Faces Shapefile contains the attributes of each topological primitive face. Each face has a unique topological face identifier (TFID) value. Each face in the shapefile includes the key geographic area codes for all geographic areas for which the Census Bureau tabulates data for both the 2020 Census and the annual estimates and surveys. The geometries of each of these geographic areas can then be built by dissolving the face geometries on the appropriate key geographic area codes in the Topological Faces Shapefile.

  16. n

    Street and Address Composite

    • data.gis.ny.gov
    Updated Dec 20, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    ShareGIS NY (2022). Street and Address Composite [Dataset]. https://data.gis.ny.gov/content/street-and-address-composite
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 20, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    ShareGIS NY
    Area covered
    Description

    The Street_and_Address_Composite will return a geographic coordinate when a street address is entered. A user can enter an address either manually or by bulk input from a database or other source.The geocoder returns a coordinate pair and standardized address for each input address it is able to match. The NYS ITS Geospatial Services geocoder uses a series of combinations of reference data and configuration parameters to optimize both the likelihood of a match and the quality of the results. The reference data supporting the geocoder is stored in Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) standard.The first composite locator (Street_and_Address_Composite) is made up of the following set of locators which are most likely to return a high quality hit. The locators are listed in the order in which they will be accessed along with a brief description of the locator's source data. These six locators will generate the majority of the results when geocoding addresses.Locator NameSource DataDescription1A_SAM_AP_ZipNameSAM Address PointsSAM address points using the postal zip code name for the city name in the locator.1B_SAM_AP_CTNameSAM Address PointsSAM address points. The city or town name is used for the city name in the locator.1C_SAM_AP_PlaceNameSAM Address PointsSAM address points. The city name is populated using the NYS Villages and Indian Reservations, the Census Designated Places and Alternate Acceptable Zip Code Names from the USPS. These names do not exist everywhere so there will be a limited number of points in this locator.3A_SS_ZipNameNYS Street SegmentsNYS Street Segments dataset using the postal zip code name for the city name in the locator. The location is interpolated from an address range on the street segment. The city name can be different for the left and right sides of the streets.3B_SS_CTNameNYS Street SegmentsNYS Street Segments using the city or town name for the city name in the locator. The location is interpolated from an address range on the street segment.3C_SS_PlaceNameNYS Street SegmentsNYS Street Segments using an alternate place name for the city field. This field is populated using the NYS Villages and Indian Reservations, the Census Designated Places and Alternate Acceptable Zip Code Names from the USPS. These areas do not exist everywhere so there will be a limited number of segments with this attribute. The location is interpolated from an address range on the street segment.For more information about the geocoding service, please visit: https://gis.ny.gov/address-geocoder.For documentation on how to add these locators to ArcGIS, please reference Adding the Statewide Geocoding Web Service. If you would like these locators to be your default locators in ArcGIS, copy DefaultLocators.xml to C:\Users<username>\AppData\Roaming\ESRI\Desktop10.X\Locators, where

  17. TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2020, County, Harrison County, IA, Topological Faces...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • res1catalogd-o-tdatad-o-tgov.vcapture.xyz
    Updated Jan 28, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Spatial Data Collection and Products Branch (Point of Contact) (2024). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2020, County, Harrison County, IA, Topological Faces (Polygons With All Geocodes) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2020-county-harrison-county-ia-topological-faces-polygons-with-all-geocode
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 28, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
    Area covered
    Harrison County
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Face refers to the areal (polygon) topological primitives that make up MTDB. A face is bounded by one or more edges; its boundary includes only the edges that separate it from other faces, not any interior edges contained within the area of the face. The Topological Faces Shapefile contains the attributes of each topological primitive face. Each face has a unique topological face identifier (TFID) value. Each face in the shapefile includes the key geographic area codes for all geographic areas for which the Census Bureau tabulates data for both the 2020 Census and the annual estimates and surveys. The geometries of each of these geographic areas can then be built by dissolving the face geometries on the appropriate key geographic area codes in the Topological Faces Shapefile.

  18. f

    HOLC Frequency in real and virtual enumeration districts.

    • plos.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    xls
    Updated Jan 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Shuo Jim Huang; Michel Boudreaux; Kellee White Whilby; Rozalina G. McCoy; Neil Jay Sehgal (2025). HOLC Frequency in real and virtual enumeration districts. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004067.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 15, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS Global Public Health
    Authors
    Shuo Jim Huang; Michel Boudreaux; Kellee White Whilby; Rozalina G. McCoy; Neil Jay Sehgal
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    HOLC Frequency in real and virtual enumeration districts.

  19. f

    Results of likelihood ratio tests for differences in percent disagreement...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jan 31, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tyler Schappe; Lisa M. McElroy; Moronke Ogundolie; Roland Matsouaka; Ursula Rogers; Nrupen A. Bhavsar (2025). Results of likelihood ratio tests for differences in percent disagreement among strata of census tract and block group assignments between DeGAUSS and vendor tool geocoding. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317215.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 31, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Tyler Schappe; Lisa M. McElroy; Moronke Ogundolie; Roland Matsouaka; Ursula Rogers; Nrupen A. Bhavsar
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Results of likelihood ratio tests for differences in percent disagreement among strata of census tract and block group assignments between DeGAUSS and vendor tool geocoding.

  20. f

    Estimated Cohen’s Kappa and percent disagreement [95% confidence interval]...

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jan 31, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tyler Schappe; Lisa M. McElroy; Moronke Ogundolie; Roland Matsouaka; Ursula Rogers; Nrupen A. Bhavsar (2025). Estimated Cohen’s Kappa and percent disagreement [95% confidence interval] of census tract and block group Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) assignments resulting from DeGAUSS and vendor tool geocoding process, by geographic census unit. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317215.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 31, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Tyler Schappe; Lisa M. McElroy; Moronke Ogundolie; Roland Matsouaka; Ursula Rogers; Nrupen A. Bhavsar
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Estimated Cohen’s Kappa and percent disagreement [95% confidence interval] of census tract and block group Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) assignments resulting from DeGAUSS and vendor tool geocoding process, by geographic census unit.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
GeoPlatform ArcGIS Online (2024). Address Ranges [Dataset]. https://hifld-geoplatform.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/address-ranges/explore
Organization logo

Address Ranges

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Aug 30, 2024
Dataset provided by
https://arcgis.com/
Authors
GeoPlatform ArcGIS Online
Description

Address ranges describe a label given to a unique collection of addresses that fall along a road or path. Address ranges provide a way of locating homes and businesses based on their street addresses when no other location information is available.Using a house number, street name, street side and ZIP code, address ranges can locate the address to the geographic area associated to that side of the street. Once geocoded, the U.S. Census Bureau can assign the address to a field assignment area or tabulate the data for that address. In addition, academics, researchers, professionals and government agencies outside of the Census Bureau use MAF/TIGER address ranges to transform tabular addresses into geographical datasets for decision-making and analytical purposes.Address ranges must be unique to geocode addresses to the correct location and avoid geocoding conflicts. Multiple elements in MAF/TIGER are required to make an address range unique including street names, address house numbers and street feature geometries, such as street centerlines. The address range data model is designed to maximize geocoding matches with their correct geographic areas in MAF/TIGER by allowing an unlimited number of address range-to-street feature relationships.The Census Bureau’s Geography Division devises numerous operations and processes to build and maintain high quality address ranges so that:Address ranges accurately describe the location of addresses on the ground.Address All possible city-style addresses are geocoded.Address ranges can handle all known address and street name variations.Address ranges conform with current U.S. Postal Service ZIP codes.Address ranges are reliable and free from conflicts.Automated software continually updates existing address ranges, builds new address ranges and corrects errors. An automated operation links address location points and tabular address information to street feature edges with matching street names in the same block to build and modify address ranges.Many business rules and legal value checks ensure quality address range data in MAF/TIGER. For example, business rules prevent adding or modifying address ranges that overlap another house number range with the same street name and ZIP code. Legal value checks verify that address ranges include mandatory attribute information, valid data types and valid character values.Some of the TIGER/Line products for the public include address ranges and give the public the ability to geocode addresses to MAF/TIGER address ranges for the user’s own purpose. The address range files are available for the nation, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Island Areas at the county level. TIGER/Line files require geographic information system (GIS) software to use.The Census Bureau Geocoder Service is a web service provided to the public. The service accepts up to 1,000 input addresses and, based on Census address ranges, returns the interpolated geocoded location and census geographies. Users can access the service a web interface or a representational state transfer (REST) application program interface (API) web service. See the Census Geocoder for more information on this process. Directions on how to use the Census Geocoder available: Geocoding Services Web Application Programming Interface (API)Download: https://www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TGRGDB24/tlgdb_2024_a_us_addr.gdb.zip

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu