29 datasets found
  1. Central Appalachian coal marker price in the U.S.1990-2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Aug 5, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Central Appalachian coal marker price in the U.S.1990-2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1322066/us-central-appalachian-coal-price/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 5, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The U.S. Central Appalachian coal price is a key indicator for coal prices across the country. The region includes parts of Eastern Kentucky, Virginia, West Virginia, and Tennessee, which are some of the largest coal-producing states in the country. In 2024, the average Central Appalachian coal spot price stood at 77.67 U.S. dollars per metric ton. This was less than half the average price in 2022. Coal commodity prices surged in 2022 as sanctions on Russian imports, production loss in Australia, and a temporary export ban in Indonesia put pressure on supply volumes. Other important global coal benchmarks include the Northwest Europe marker price, Australia's Newcastle, and China's Qinhuangdao price.

  2. Weekly Central Appalachian coal price in the U.S. 2021-2025

    • statista.com
    Updated Aug 12, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Weekly Central Appalachian coal price in the U.S. 2021-2025 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1322094/weekly-us-central-appalachian-coal-price/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 12, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2021 - Aug 8, 2025
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    On August 8, 2025, the U.S. Central Appalachian coal price stood at 78 U.S. dollars per short ton. Prices have been especially stable throughout the first half of 2025, with figures staying below 80 U.S. dollars. Central Appalachian coal is produced in parts of Eastern Kentucky, Virginia, West Virginia, and Tennessee. In 2024, the annual Central Appalachian coal spot price stood at 77.67 U.S. dollars per metric ton.

  3. k

    Data from: Coal Prices

    • datasource.kapsarc.org
    Updated Oct 4, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2022). Coal Prices [Dataset]. https://datasource.kapsarc.org/explore/dataset/coal-prices/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 4, 2022
    Description

    This dataset contains information about world's coal price from 1987. Data from BP. Follow datasource.kapsarc.org for timely data to advance energy economics research.Notes:- Source: IHS Northwest Europe prices for 1990-2000 are the average of the monthly marker, 2001-2016 the average of weekly prices. IHS Japan prices basis = 6,000 kilocalories per kilogram NAR CIF.- The Asian prices are the average of the monthly marker.- Chinese prices are the average monthly price for 2000-2005, weekly prices 2006 -2016, 5,500 kilocalories per kilogram NAR, including cost and freight (CFR)- Source: Platts. Prices are for CAPP 12,500 Btu, 1.2 SO2 coal, fob. - CAPP = Central Appalachian; cif = cost+insurance+freight (average prices); fob = free on board. &am

  4. f

    Table_1_Mountaintop removal coal mining impacts on structural and functional...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated Jun 15, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Roger A. Burke; Ken M. Fritz; Brent R. Johnson; Rachel Price (2023). Table_1_Mountaintop removal coal mining impacts on structural and functional indicators in Central Appalachian streams.xlsx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.988061.s014
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Roger A. Burke; Ken M. Fritz; Brent R. Johnson; Rachel Price
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Appalachian Mountains
    Description

    Mountaintop removal coal mining (MTR) has been a major source of landscape change in the Central Appalachians of the United States (US). Changes in stream hydrology, channel geomorphology and water quality caused by MTR coal mining can lead to severe impairment of stream ecological integrity. The objective of the Clean Water Act (CWA) is to restore and maintain the ecological integrity of the Nation's waters. Sensitive, readily measured indicators of ecosystem structure and function are needed for the assessment of stream ecological integrity. Most CWA assessments rely on structural indicators; inclusion of functional indicators could make these assessments more holistic and effective. The goals of this study were: (1) test the efficacy of selected carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling and microbial structural and functional indicators for assessing MTR coal mining impacts on streams; (2) determine whether indicators respond to impacts in a predictable manner; and (3) determine if functional indicators are less likely to change than are structural indicators in response to stressors associated with MTR coal mining. The structural indicators are water quality and sediment organic matter concentrations, and the functional indicators relate to microbial activity and biofilm production. Seasonal measurements were conducted over the course of a year in streams draining small MTR-impacted and forested watersheds in the Twentymile Creek watershed of West Virginia (WV). Five of the eight structural parameters measured had significant responses, with all means greater in the MTR-impacted streams than in the forested streams. These responses resulted from changes in source or augmentation of the original source of the C and N structural parameters because of MTR coal mining. Nitrate concentration and the stable carbon isotopic ratio of dissolved inorganic carbon were the most effective indicators evaluated in this study. Only three of the fourteen functional indicators measured had significant responses to MTR coal mining, with all means greater in the forested streams than in the MTR-impacted streams. These results suggest that stressors associated with MTR coal mining caused reduction in some aspects of microbial cycling, but resource subsidies may have counterbalanced some of the inhibition leading to no observable change in most of the functional indicators. The detritus base, which is thought to confer functional stability, was likely sustained in the MTR-impacted streams by channel storage and/or leaf litter inputs from their largely intact riparian zones. Overall, our results largely support the hypothesis that certain functional processes are more resistant to stress induced change than structural properties but also suggest the difficulty of identifying suitable functional indicators for ecological integrity assessment.

  5. f

    Mapping the yearly extent of surface coal mining in Central Appalachia using...

    • plos.figshare.com
    txt
    Updated May 30, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Andrew A. Pericak; Christian J. Thomas; David A. Kroodsma; Matthew F. Wasson; Matthew R. V. Ross; Nicholas E. Clinton; David J. Campagna; Yolandita Franklin; Emily S. Bernhardt; John F. Amos (2023). Mapping the yearly extent of surface coal mining in Central Appalachia using Landsat and Google Earth Engine [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197758
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Andrew A. Pericak; Christian J. Thomas; David A. Kroodsma; Matthew F. Wasson; Matthew R. V. Ross; Nicholas E. Clinton; David J. Campagna; Yolandita Franklin; Emily S. Bernhardt; John F. Amos
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Appalachia
    Description

    Surface mining for coal has taken place in the Central Appalachian region of the United States for well over a century, with a notable increase since the 1970s. Researchers have quantified the ecosystem and health impacts stemming from mining, relying in part on a geospatial dataset defining surface mining’s extent at a decadal interval. This dataset, however, does not deliver the temporal resolution necessary to support research that could establish causal links between mining activity and environmental or public health and safety outcomes, nor has it been updated since 2005. Here we use Google Earth Engine and Landsat imagery to map the yearly extent of surface coal mining in Central Appalachia from 1985 through 2015, making our processing models and output data publicly available. We find that 2,900 km2 of land has been newly mined over this 31-year period. Adding this more-recent mining to surface mines constructed prior to 1985, we calculate a cumulative mining footprint of 5,900 km2. Over the study period, correlating active mine area with historical surface mine coal production shows that each metric ton of coal is associated with 12 m2 of actively mined land. Our automated, open-source model can be regularly updated as new surface mining occurs in the region and can be refined to capture mining reclamation activity into the future. We freely and openly offer the data for use in a range of environmental, health, and economic studies; moreover, we demonstrate the capability of using tools like Earth Engine to analyze years of remotely sensed imagery over spatially large areas to quantify land use change.

  6. f

    Mapping the yearly extent of surface coal mining in Central Appalachia using...

    • figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    txt
    Updated May 21, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Andrew A. Pericak; Christian J. Thomas; David A. Kroodsma; Matthew F. Wasson; Matthew R. V. Ross; Nicholas E. Clinton; David J. Campagna; Yolandita Franklin; Emily S. Bernhardt; John F. Amos (2018). Mapping the yearly extent of surface coal mining in Central Appalachia using Landsat and Google Earth Engine — Yearly Mining Areas (shapefile) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6253976.v1
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 21, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Authors
    Andrew A. Pericak; Christian J. Thomas; David A. Kroodsma; Matthew F. Wasson; Matthew R. V. Ross; Nicholas E. Clinton; David J. Campagna; Yolandita Franklin; Emily S. Bernhardt; John F. Amos
    License

    https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.htmlhttps://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html

    Area covered
    Appalachia
    Description

    These data accompany the 2018 manuscript published in PLOS One titled "Mapping the yearly extent of surface coal mining in Central Appalachia using Landsat and Google Earth Engine". In this manuscript, researchers used the Google Earth Engine platform and freely-accessible Landsat imagery to create a yearly dataset (1985 through 2015) of surface coal mining in the Appalachian region of the United States of America. This specific dataset is a collection of Esri shapefiles of the mining areas as determined by this study for each year from 1985 through 2015. Individual file names within the dataset indicate the specific year. These files show the mining “footprint” in Appalachia for that given year, indicating that mining was occurring in a given location during that year. These files do not, however, indicate the year at which mining began or ceased in any given location.

  7. d

    Data from: Ground-water quality in unmined areas and near reclaimed surface...

    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    Updated Jun 26, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2018). Ground-water quality in unmined areas and near reclaimed surface coal mines in the northern and central Appalachian coal regions, Pennsylvania and West Virginia [Dataset]. http://datadiscoverystudio.org/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/840a37f12275423da60403fb0e7eb40d/html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 26, 2018
    Area covered
    Description

    Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Service Protocol: Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Application Profile: Web Browser. Link Function: information

  8. T

    Coal - Price Data

    • tradingeconomics.com
    • tr.tradingeconomics.com
    • +13more
    csv, excel, json, xml
    Updated Oct 23, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    TRADING ECONOMICS (2016). Coal - Price Data [Dataset]. https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/coal
    Explore at:
    csv, xml, json, excelAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 23, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    TRADING ECONOMICS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Dec 5, 2008 - Aug 29, 2025
    Area covered
    World
    Description

    Coal rose to 109.60 USD/T on August 29, 2025, up 0.05% from the previous day. Over the past month, Coal's price has fallen 4.74%, and is down 23.76% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. Coal - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on September of 2025.

  9. A

    2000 Resource Assessment of Selected Coal Beds and Zones in the Northern and...

    • data.amerigeoss.org
    • data.wu.ac.at
    html
    Updated Aug 9, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Energy Data Exchange (2019). 2000 Resource Assessment of Selected Coal Beds and Zones in the Northern and Central Appalachian Basin Coal Regions [Dataset]. https://data.amerigeoss.org/es/dataset/2000-resource-assessment-usgs
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 9, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    Energy Data Exchange
    Area covered
    Appalachian Mountains
    Description

    A report detailing the surveying and resulting predictions for coal beds in regions of the Appalachian Basin. Data downloads include Coal Bed Thickness (Isopachs), Mined Area, Areal Extent (Outcrop), Overburden Thickness, Area of Known Resources, Stratigraphic Data Points, Structure (Elevation).

  10. d

    Data from: Assessment of Appalachian Basin Oil and Gas Resources:...

    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    Updated Jul 30, 2004
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2004). Assessment of Appalachian Basin Oil and Gas Resources: Carboniferous Coal-bed Gas Total Petroleum System [Dataset]. http://datadiscoverystudio.org/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/bfebcffb6d7949f98f1077532c58a8b0/html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 30, 2004
    Area covered
    Description

    Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Service Protocol: Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Application Profile: Web Browser. Link Function: information

  11. Assessing the Impact of Overburden Materials Selection from an Appalachian...

    • s.cnmilf.com
    • catalog.data.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Nov 12, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development (ORD) (2020). Assessing the Impact of Overburden Materials Selection from an Appalachian Region Coal Mine in Mine Water Quality Using a Standard Columns Leaching Test [Dataset]. https://s.cnmilf.com/user74170196/https/catalog.data.gov/dataset/assessing-the-impact-of-overburden-materials-selection-from-an-appalachian-region-coal-min
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 12, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    United States Environmental Protection Agencyhttp://www.epa.gov/
    Area covered
    Appalachia
    Description

    The objective of this study was to evaluate the leachate conductivity generated by overburden materials in a columns test representing the surface coal mining conditions and its correlation with cations, anions, pH, and alkalinity in two scenarios: “Altered” and “Unaltered” with the application of the screening and segregation proposed method. . For the Unaltered scenario, all strata were included; while the Altered scenario excluded the overburden strata with the highest 15% conductivities measured in the screening-level assessment. The 15% selection criterion was based on the best professional judgment that this would be a reasonable overburden quantity to be selectively identified and isolated in a surface coal mining operation. This dataset is associated with the following publication: Pinto, P., S. Al-Abed , C. Holder, R. Warner, J. McKernan , S. Fulton, and E. Somerville. Assessing the Impact of Removing Select Materials from Coal Mine Overburden, Central Appalachia Region, USA. Robert Kleinmann Mine Water and the Environment. Springer-Verlag, BERLIN-HEIDELBERG, GERMANY, 37(1): 31-41, (2018).

  12. d

    Excess Nitrate Export from Mountaintop Removal Coal Mining Dataset

    • search.dataone.org
    • beta.hydroshare.org
    • +1more
    Updated Apr 15, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Alexander C. Brooks; Matthew R.V. Ross; Fabian Nippgen; Brian L. McGlynn; Emily S. Bernhardt (2022). Excess Nitrate Export from Mountaintop Removal Coal Mining Dataset [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/sha256%3A576555dfbc41168ae9447d6c09b392751ddcf0a4dd0526cc0ea470c5c5941906
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 15, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Hydroshare
    Authors
    Alexander C. Brooks; Matthew R.V. Ross; Fabian Nippgen; Brian L. McGlynn; Emily S. Bernhardt
    Time period covered
    Feb 4, 1975 - Oct 5, 2016
    Area covered
    Description

    Companion datasets to manuscript on nitrate export from mountaintop removal coal mining impacted watersheds in Central Appalachia.

  13. Coal Us Price

    • indexbox.io
    doc, docx, pdf, xls +1
    Updated Sep 1, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    IndexBox Inc. (2025). Coal Us Price [Dataset]. https://www.indexbox.io/search/coal-us-price/
    Explore at:
    docx, xls, pdf, doc, xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 1, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Authors
    IndexBox Inc.
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2012 - Sep 2, 2025
    Area covered
    World, United States
    Variables measured
    Price CIF, Price FOB, Export Value, Import Price, Import Value, Export Prices, Export Volume, Import Volume
    Description

    Coal prices in the US can vary significantly depending on factors such as supply and demand dynamics, production costs, transportation costs, and environmental regulations. The pricing of coal is typically done using various indices, with the most commonly used index being the NYMEX Coal Futures contract. This article explores the factors that influence coal prices in the US market and emphasizes the importance of understanding these factors for businesses and investors in the coal industry.

  14. AEO2011: Coal Production by Region and Type

    • data.wu.ac.at
    xls
    Updated Aug 29, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Department of Energy (2017). AEO2011: Coal Production by Region and Type [Dataset]. https://data.wu.ac.at/schema/data_gov/NDExMmI4YmMtZWNlYi00Nzk2LWI5YTEtNzlhNTIwNTBlNGE2
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 29, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    United States Department of Energyhttp://energy.gov/
    Description

    This dataset comes from the Energy Information Administration (EIA), and is part of the 2011 Annual Energy Outlook Report (AEO2011). This dataset is Table 140, and contains only the reference case. The unit of measurement in this dataset is million short tons. The data is broken down into northern Appalachia, central Appalachia, southern Appalachia, eastern interior, western interior, gulf, Dakota medium, western montana, Wyoming, Rocky Mountain, Arizona/New Mexico and Washington/Alaska.

  15. A

    Data from: Storing and Using CO2 for Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery in...

    • data.amerigeoss.org
    pdf
    Updated Aug 9, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Energy Data Exchange (2019). Storing and Using CO2 for Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery in Unmineable Coal Beds of the Northern Appalachian Basin and Parts of the Central Appalachian Basin [Dataset]. https://data.amerigeoss.org/nl/dataset/topical-5-coalbed-methane
    Explore at:
    pdf(2301355)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 9, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    Energy Data Exchange
    License

    http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by-sahttp://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/cc-by-sa

    Area covered
    Appalachian Mountains
    Description

    Report on carbon capture and storage for enhanced coalbed methane recovery in the Appalachian Basin discussing the project background in the MRCSP region, CO2 field tests, and potential storage and recovery.

  16. d

    Fire Clay Coal Zone County Statistics (Chemistry) in Kentucky, West...

    • search.dataone.org
    • data.usgs.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Oct 29, 2016
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Linda J. Bragg (2016). Fire Clay Coal Zone County Statistics (Chemistry) in Kentucky, West Virginia, and Virginia [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/7a5acec9-115d-4532-b24d-8f7a3c9a0ff9
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 29, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    Linda J. Bragg
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    St, S_MAX, S_MIN, AS_MAX, AS_MIN, CV_MAX, CV_MIN, HG_MAX, HG_MIN, S_#SMP, and 28 more
    Description

    This dataset is a polygon coverage of counties limited to the extent of the Fire Clay coal zone resource areas and attributed with statistics on these coal quality parameters: ash yield (percent), sulfur (percent), SO2 (lbs per million Btu), calorific value (Btu/lb), arsenic (ppm) content and mercury (ppm) content. The file has been generalized from detailed geologic coverages found elsewhere in Professional Paper 1625-C. The attributes were generated from public data found in the geochemical dataset found in Chap. F, Appendix 7, Disc 1. Please see the metadata file found in Chap. F, Appendix 8, Disc 1, for more detailed information on the geochemical attributes. The county statistical data used for this data set are found in Tables 2-5 and 17-18, Chap. F, Disc 1. Additional county geochemical statistics for other parameters are found in Tables 6-16, Chap. F, Disc 1.

  17. d

    ScienceBase Item Summary Page

    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    3, pdf
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    ScienceBase Item Summary Page [Dataset]. http://datadiscoverystudio.org/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/0e3eb7a26c4e4baeb066bc8eccf0df49/html
    Explore at:
    3, pdfAvailable download formats
    Area covered
    Description

    Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Service Protocol: Link to the ScienceBase Item Summary page for the item described by this metadata record. Application Profile: Web Browser. Link Function: information

  18. d

    Pond Creek Coal Zone County Statistics (Chemistry) in Kentucky, West...

    • search.dataone.org
    • data.usgs.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Oct 29, 2016
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Linda J. Bragg (2016). Pond Creek Coal Zone County Statistics (Chemistry) in Kentucky, West Virginia, and Virginia [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/d33d16af-e952-4480-9fa7-7493ece2f6e6
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 29, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    Linda J. Bragg
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    St, S_MAX, S_MIN, AS_MAX, AS_MIN, CV_MAX, CV_MIN, HG_MAX, HG_MIN, S_#SMP, and 28 more
    Description

    This dataset is a polygon coverage of counties limited to the extent of the Pond Creek coal zone resource areas and attributed with statistics on these coal quality parameters: ash yield (percent), sulfur (percent), SO2 (lbs per million Btu), calorific value (Btu/lb), arsenic (ppm) content and mercury (ppm) content. The file has been generalized from detailed geologic coverages found elsewhere in Professional Paper 1625-C. The attributes were generated from public data found in geochemical dataset found in Chap. G, Appendix 7, Disc 1. Please see the detailed information on the geochemical attributes. The county statistical data used for this data set are found in Tables 2-5 and 17-18, Chap. G, Disc 1. Additional county geochemical statistics for other parameters are found in Tables 6-16, Chap. G, Disc 1.

  19. o

    Mountaintop Removal & Water Quality

    • osf.io
    Updated Apr 3, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Michael Evans (2023). Mountaintop Removal & Water Quality [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/A2Z34
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 3, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Center For Open Science
    Authors
    Michael Evans
    Description

    Analyses linking extent of mountaintop removal coal mining across Central Appalachia with changes in water quality

  20. d

    National Assessment of Oil and Gas Project - Appalachian Basin Province...

    • search.dataone.org
    • data.usgs.gov
    • +4more
    Updated Dec 1, 2016
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2016). National Assessment of Oil and Gas Project - Appalachian Basin Province (067) Boundary [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/a5533350-c870-49ab-ad97-1f9d91f0eabf
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 1, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    United States Geological Survey (USGS)
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    REG_NUM, PROVCODE, REG_NAME, PROV_NAME
    Description

    The USGS Central Region Energy Team assesses oil and gas resources of the United States. The onshore and State water areas of the United States comprise 71 provinces. Within these provinces, Total Petroleum Systems are defined and Assessment Units are defined and assessed. Each of these provinces is defined geologically, and most province boundaries are defined by major geologic changes.

    The Appalachian Basin Province is located in the eastern United States, encompassing all or parts of the counties in Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. The main population centers within the study area are Birmingham, Alabama; Buffalo, New York; Cleveland, Ohio; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Chattanooga, Tennessee; and Roanoke, Virginia. The main Interstates are I-20, I-24, I-40, I-59, I-64, I-65, I-66, I-70, I-71, I-75, I-76, I-77, I-78, I-79, I-80, I-81, I-83, I-84, I-87, I-88, and I-90. The Ohio, Susquehanna, Allegheny, Tennessee, Coosa, Delaware, New, Potomac, and Scioto Rivers and their tributaries drain the area. The province boundary was drawn to include the geologic structures generally considered to be in or bounding the Appalachian Basin.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2025). Central Appalachian coal marker price in the U.S.1990-2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1322066/us-central-appalachian-coal-price/
Organization logo

Central Appalachian coal marker price in the U.S.1990-2024

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Aug 5, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Area covered
United States
Description

The U.S. Central Appalachian coal price is a key indicator for coal prices across the country. The region includes parts of Eastern Kentucky, Virginia, West Virginia, and Tennessee, which are some of the largest coal-producing states in the country. In 2024, the average Central Appalachian coal spot price stood at 77.67 U.S. dollars per metric ton. This was less than half the average price in 2022. Coal commodity prices surged in 2022 as sanctions on Russian imports, production loss in Australia, and a temporary export ban in Indonesia put pressure on supply volumes. Other important global coal benchmarks include the Northwest Europe marker price, Australia's Newcastle, and China's Qinhuangdao price.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu