ChatGPT was the chatbot that kickstarted the generative AI revolution, which has been responsible for hundreds of billions of dollars in data centres, graphics chips and AI startups. Launched by...

Introduction

ChatGPT Statistics: ChatGPT, an innovation of OpenAI, has made a substantial entrance into the world of technology, shattering all records with its fast user growth. Chat GPT is an AI-generated chatbot that has been making waves in the technical world since its launch. It has a startling ability to mimic human conversation, making it a reliable tool for various tasks that range from drafting emails, answering queries, and writing essays to even assisting with coding as well.

The substructure of ChatGPT is built on OpenAI's GPT-3, which is a large language model that was showered as one of the enlightened language models when introduced in 2020. This article hunts through the captivating ChatGPT Statistics and traverses everything from user growth nationwide to revenue generation and much more.

Introduction

ChatGPT Statistics: ChatGPT has made notable advancements in natural language processing (NLP) and artificial intelligence (AI), impacting multiple industries. Its advanced capabilities have positioned ChatGPT as a flexible tool, widely integrated into areas such as customer support, content generation, and market research.

Through the analysis of user interactions, ChatGPT provides valuable insights into engagement patterns, technological applications, and the performance of its conversational features. This comprehensive statistical overview examines user behavior and identifies emerging trends that will shape the future of AI-driven communication technologies.

In a survey conducted across **** Southeast Asian countries in February 2023, almost half of the respondents selected collection of personal data as one of the concerns they had regarding the usage of chatbots like ChatGPT. In contrast, ethical issues related to data privacy and intellectual property were a concern for ** percent of the respondents.

The AI chatbot race between Claude and ChatGPT is reshaping how people work and communicate. Whether drafting business code or fast-tracking creative tasks, these tools power productivity and insight across industries. For instance, enterprise teams integrate Claude’s advanced reasoning into analytics platforms, while marketers tap ChatGPT for on-demand content ideation....

According to a survey ended March 2025, 28 percent of employed adults in the United States reported using ChatGPT for work-related activities during the analyzed period. Similarly, 26 percent of responding adults stated using the generative artificial intelligence (GAI) software for learning something new, while 22 percent claimed to use it for pure entertainment. However, the increase in ChatGPT usage was more pronounced for professional activities.

ChatGPT is used most widely among those between ** and ** around the world. The youngest group, those under **, are the second largest userbase, and together those under ** account for over ** percent of ChatGPT users. It is perhaps unsurprising that the younger age brackets use the chatbot more than older as that is the common trend with new technologies. Male users were far more numerous than female users, with males representing over ** percent of total users in 2023.

Weekly active user statistics for ChatGPT from January 2023 to April 2025.

In January 2024, ChatGPT online domain chat.openai.com registered over **** percent of its traffic as originating in the United States. Users based in India generated approximately **** percent of the total visits to the chatbot platform, while users in Indonesia accounted for *** percent of the total visits to the website. Visits from Brazil represented the fourth-largest group for the platform, generating more than **** percent of the total traffic recorded in the examined period.

This dataset presents ChatGPT usage patterns across U.S. Census regions, based on a 2025 nationwide survey. It tracks how often users followed, partially used, or never used ChatGPT by state region.

This dataset shows how men and women in the U.S. reported using ChatGPT in a 2025 survey, including whether they followed its advice or chose not to use it.

This dataset presents ChatGPT usage patterns across different age groups, showing the percentage of users who have followed its advice, used it without following advice, or have never used it, based on a 2025 U.S. survey.

The rivalry between ChatGPT and Google Gemini defines the generative AI landscape. ChatGPT remains the leader in active engagement, while Gemini closes the gap through mass distribution. From corporate reports to web traffic studies, figures speak clearly about adoption, reach, and momentum. Explore what makes each platform stand out, and what...

A major challenge of our time is reducing disparities in access to and effective use of digital technologies, with recent discussions highlighting the role of AI in exacerbating the digital divide. We examine user characteristics that predict usage of the AI-powered conversational agent ChatGPT. We combine behavioral and survey data in a web tracked sample of N=1376 German citizens to investigate differences in ChatGPT activity (usage, visits, and adoption) during the first 11 months from the launch of the service (November 30, 2022). Guided by a model of technology acceptance (UTAUT-2), we examine the role of socio-demographics commonly associated with the digital divide in ChatGPT activity and explore further socio-political attributes identified via stability selection in Lasso regressions. We confirm that lower age and higher education affect ChatGPT usage, but neither gender nor income do. We find full-time employment and more children to be barriers to ChatGPT activity. Using a variety of social media was positively associated with ChatGPT activity. In terms of political variables, political knowledge and political self-efficacy as well as some political behaviors such as voting, debating political issues online and offline and political action online were all associated with ChatGPT activity, with online political debating and political self-efficacy negatively so. Finally, need for cognition and communication skills such as writing, attending meetings, or giving presentations, were also associated with ChatGPT engagement, though chairing/organizing meetings was negatively associated. Our research informs efforts to address digital disparities and promote digital literacy among underserved populations by presenting implications, recommendations, and discussions on ethical and social issues of our findings.

This dataset shows the types of advice users sought from ChatGPT based on a 2025 U.S. survey, including education, financial, medical, and legal topics.

This project investigated teacher attitudes towards Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools (GAITs). In excess of three hundred teachers were surveyed across a broad variety of teaching levels, demographic areas, experience levels, and disciplinary areas, to better understand how they believe teaching and assessment should change as a result of GAITs such as ChatGPT.Teachers were invited to complete an online survey relating to their perceptions of the open Artificial Intelligence (AI) tool ChatGPT, and how it will influence what they teach and how they assess. The purpose of the study is to provide teachers, policymakers, and society at large with an understanding of the potential impact of tools such as ChatGPT on Education.This dataset contains public data files used for the ChatGPT survey (XLSX) and the survey containing variable selection codes (DOCX). See the second sheet of the XLSX file for variable descriptions.

This dataset reflects how Americans perceive ChatGPT's broader societal impact, based on a 2025 survey that asked whether the AI will help or harm humanity.

A comparative table of response and citation characteristics for ChatGPT and Google AI Overview in 2025, including response length, sentence length, number of sources, duplication rate, domain overlap, subjectivity, readability, AI marker usage, domain age share, and semantic similarity.

This dataset summarizes how ChatGPT users rated the outcomes of the advice they received, including whether it was helpful, harmful, neutral, or uncertain, based on a 2025 U.S. survey.

As large language models (LLMs) such as GPT have become more accessible, concerns about their potential effects on students’ learning have grown. In data science education, the specter of students’ turning to LLMs raises multiple issues, as writing is a means not just of conveying information but of developing their statistical reasoning. In our study, we engage with questions surrounding LLMs and their pedagogical impact by: (a) quantitatively and qualitatively describing how select LLMs write report introductions and complete data analysis reports; and (b) comparing patterns in texts authored by LLMs to those authored by students and by published researchers. Our results show distinct differences between machine-generated and human-generated writing, as well as between novice and expert writing. Those differences are evident in how writers manage information, modulate confidence, signal importance, and report statistics. The findings can help inform classroom instruction, whether that instruction is aimed at dissuading the use of LLMs or at guiding their use as a productivity tool. It also has implications for students’ development as statistical thinkers and writers. What happens when they offload the work of data science to a model that doesn’t write quite like a data scientist? Supplementary materials for this article are available online.