85 datasets found
  1. Share of web traffic in Morocco 2023, by search engine

    • statista.com
    Updated Feb 13, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2023). Share of web traffic in Morocco 2023, by search engine [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1365083/share-of-web-traffic-in-morocco-by-search-engine/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 13, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jan 2023
    Area covered
    Morocco
    Description

    In 2023, Google was the most used search engine in Morocco, accounting for around 97 percent of the web traffic. The next most used search engine was Bing, which made up approximately two percent of web traffic in Morocco. The number of people using the internet in Morocco stood at 31.6 million in 2022, the fourth highest amount of internet users in Africa.

  2. Total global visitor traffic to Google.com 2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Jan 22, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Total global visitor traffic to Google.com 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/268252/web-visitor-traffic-to-googlecom/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 22, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Oct 2023 - Mar 2024
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    In March 2024, search platform Google.com generated approximately 85.5 billion visits, down from 87 billion platform visits in October 2023. Google is a global search platform and one of the biggest online companies worldwide.

  3. O

    Website Analytics

    • data.brla.gov
    • catalog.data.gov
    • +2more
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Mar 18, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Information Services (2025). Website Analytics [Dataset]. https://data.brla.gov/widgets/n9u7-h9i7
    Explore at:
    csv, xml, application/rssxml, json, tsv, application/rdfxmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 18, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Information Services
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Web traffic statistics for the several City-Parish websites, brla.gov, city.brla.gov, Red Stick Ready, GIS, Open Data etc. Information provided by Google Analytics.

  4. DataForSEO Labs API for keyword research and search analytics, real-time...

    • datarade.ai
    .json
    Updated Jun 4, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    DataForSEO (2021). DataForSEO Labs API for keyword research and search analytics, real-time data for all Google locations and languages [Dataset]. https://datarade.ai/data-products/dataforseo-labs-api-for-keyword-research-and-search-analytics-dataforseo
    Explore at:
    .jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 4, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Authors
    DataForSEO
    Area covered
    Tokelau, Azerbaijan, Korea (Democratic People's Republic of), Mauritania, Micronesia (Federated States of), Cocos (Keeling) Islands, Kenya, Isle of Man, Morocco, Armenia
    Description

    DataForSEO Labs API offers three powerful keyword research algorithms and historical keyword data:

    • Related Keywords from the “searches related to” element of Google SERP. • Keyword Suggestions that match the specified seed keyword with additional words before, after, or within the seed key phrase. • Keyword Ideas that fall into the same category as specified seed keywords. • Historical Search Volume with current cost-per-click, and competition values.

    Based on in-market categories of Google Ads, you can get keyword ideas from the relevant Categories For Domain and discover relevant Keywords For Categories. You can also obtain Top Google Searches with AdWords and Bing Ads metrics, product categories, and Google SERP data.

    You will find well-rounded ways to scout the competitors:

    • Domain Whois Overview with ranking and traffic info from organic and paid search. • Ranked Keywords that any domain or URL has positions for in SERP. • SERP Competitors and the rankings they hold for the keywords you specify. • Competitors Domain with a full overview of its rankings and traffic from organic and paid search. • Domain Intersection keywords for which both specified domains rank within the same SERPs. • Subdomains for the target domain you specify along with the ranking distribution across organic and paid search. • Relevant Pages of the specified domain with rankings and traffic data. • Domain Rank Overview with ranking and traffic data from organic and paid search. • Historical Rank Overview with historical data on rankings and traffic of the specified domain from organic and paid search. • Page Intersection keywords for which the specified pages rank within the same SERP.

    All DataForSEO Labs API endpoints function in the Live mode. This means you will be provided with the results in response right after sending the necessary parameters with a POST request.

    The limit is 2000 API calls per minute, however, you can contact our support team if your project requires higher rates.

    We offer well-rounded API documentation, GUI for API usage control, comprehensive client libraries for different programming languages, free sandbox API testing, ad hoc integration, and deployment support.

    We have a pay-as-you-go pricing model. You simply add funds to your account and use them to get data. The account balance doesn't expire.

  5. World Traffic Web Map

    • walmart-event-collaboration-portal-walmarttech.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Jun 18, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Walmart Emergency Management (2021). World Traffic Web Map [Dataset]. https://walmart-event-collaboration-portal-walmarttech.hub.arcgis.com/maps/c2b5a2a5f89942508b2ef1cf02acf610
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 18, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Walmarthttp://walmart.com/
    Authors
    Walmart Emergency Management
    Area covered
    Description

    This is a dynamic traffic map service with capabilities for visualizing traffic speeds relative to free-flow speeds as well as traffic incidents which can be visualized and identified. The traffic data is updated every five minutes. Traffic speeds are displayed as a percentage of free-flow speeds, which is frequently the speed limit or how fast cars tend to travel when unencumbered by other vehicles. The streets are color coded as follows:Green (fast): 85 - 100% of free flow speedsYellow (moderate): 65 - 85%Orange (slow); 45 - 65%Red (stop and go): 0 - 45%Esri's historical, live, and predictive traffic feeds come directly from HERE (www.HERE.com). HERE collects billions of GPS and cell phone probe records per month and, where available, uses sensor and toll-tag data to augment the probe data collected. An advanced algorithm compiles the data and computes accurate speeds. Historical traffic is based on the average of observed speeds over the past three years. The live and predictive traffic data is updated every five minutes through traffic feeds. The color coded traffic map layer can be used to represent relative traffic speeds; this is a common type of a map for online services and is used to provide context for routing, navigation and field operations. The traffic map layer contains two sublayers: Traffic and Live Traffic. The Traffic sublayer (shown by default) leverages historical, live and predictive traffic data; while the Live Traffic sublayer is calculated from just the live and predictive traffic data only. A color coded traffic map image can be requested for the current time and any time in the future. A map image for a future request might be used for planning purposes. The map layer also includes dynamic traffic incidents showing the location of accidents, construction, closures and other issues that could potentially impact the flow of traffic. Traffic incidents are commonly used to provide context for routing, navigation and field operations. Incidents are not features; they cannot be exported and stored for later use or additional analysis. The service works globally and can be used to visualize traffic speeds and incidents in many countries. Check the service coverage web map to determine availability in your area of interest. In the coverage map, the countries color coded in dark green support visualizing live traffic. The support for traffic incidents can be determined by identifying a country. For detailed information on this service, including a data coverage map, visit the directions and routing documentation and ArcGIS Help.

  6. Leading websites worldwide 2024, by monthly visits

    • statista.com
    • flwrdeptvarieties.store
    Updated Mar 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Leading websites worldwide 2024, by monthly visits [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1201880/most-visited-websites-worldwide/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 24, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Nov 2024
    Area covered
    World
    Description

    In November 2024, Google.com was the most popular website worldwide with 136 billion average monthly visits. The online platform has held the top spot as the most popular website since June 2010, when it pulled ahead of Yahoo into first place. Second-ranked YouTube generated more than 72.8 billion monthly visits in the measured period. The internet leaders: search, social, and e-commerce Social networks, search engines, and e-commerce websites shape the online experience as we know it. While Google leads the global online search market by far, YouTube and Facebook have become the world’s most popular websites for user generated content, solidifying Alphabet’s and Meta’s leadership over the online landscape. Meanwhile, websites such as Amazon and eBay generate millions in profits from the sale and distribution of goods, making the e-market sector an integral part of the global retail scene. What is next for online content? Powering social media and websites like Reddit and Wikipedia, user-generated content keeps moving the internet’s engines. However, the rise of generative artificial intelligence will bring significant changes to how online content is produced and handled. ChatGPT is already transforming how online search is performed, and news of Google's 2024 deal for licensing Reddit content to train large language models (LLMs) signal that the internet is likely to go through a new revolution. While AI's impact on the online market might bring both opportunities and challenges, effective content management will remain crucial for profitability on the web.

  7. E-commerce website traffic share in Latin America 2022, by source

    • flwrdeptvarieties.store
    • statista.com
    Updated Mar 1, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista Research Department (2024). E-commerce website traffic share in Latin America 2022, by source [Dataset]. https://flwrdeptvarieties.store/?_=%2Ftopics%2F8495%2Fonline-marketplaces-in-latin-america%2F%23zUpilBfjadnL7vc%2F8wIHANZKd8oHtis%3D
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 1, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Authors
    Statista Research Department
    Area covered
    Latin America
    Description

    Direct online search was the main channel for online marketplace traffic in Mexico, Colombia, Peru, and Chile in the third quarter of 2022. On average, 41.2 percent of online visits to marketplaces in these countries came from searches made directly on their websites. Organic search was the leading referring source for online food retailers, at about 34.8 percent.

  8. Share of web traffic in Egypt 2022, by search engine

    • statista.com
    Updated Mar 27, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Share of web traffic in Egypt 2022, by search engine [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1410249/distribution-of-web-traffic-in-south-africa-by-search-engine/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 27, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Nov 2022
    Area covered
    Egypt
    Description

    Google dominated the Egyptian web traffic. As of November 2022, close to 97.5 percent of the web traffic was referred via this search engine. Bing was its closest competitor, with only 1.5 percent. Yahoo! came in third place, with a share of almost 0.3 percent.

  9. a

    ESRI Traffic Service

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • hub-gema-soc.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Jan 26, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Georgia Emergency Management & Homeland Security Agency (2018). ESRI Traffic Service [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/28d6cf5e19084fc3b58db8646968ec2b
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 26, 2018
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Georgia Emergency Management & Homeland Security Agency
    Area covered
    Description

    The map layers in this service provide color-coded maps of the traffic conditions you can expect for the present time (the default). The map shows present traffic as a blend of live and typical information. Live speeds are used wherever available and are established from real-time sensor readings. Typical speeds come from a record of average speeds, which are collected over several weeks within the last year or so. Layers also show current incident locations where available. By changing the map time, the service can also provide past and future conditions. Live readings from sensors are saved for 12 hours, so setting the map time back within 12 hours allows you to see a actual recorded traffic speeds, supplemented with typical averages by default. You can choose to turn off the average speeds and see only the recorded live traffic speeds for any time within the 12-hour window. Predictive traffic conditions are shown for any time in the future.The color-coded traffic map layer can be used to represent relative traffic speeds; this is a common type of a map for online services and is used to provide context for routing, navigation, and field operations. A color-coded traffic map can be requested for the current time and any time in the future. A map for a future request might be used for planning purposes.The map also includes dynamic traffic incidents showing the location of accidents, construction, closures, and other issues that could potentially impact the flow of traffic. Traffic incidents are commonly used to provide context for routing, navigation and field operations. Incidents are not features; they cannot be exported and stored for later use or additional analysis.Data sourceEsri’s typical speed records and live and predictive traffic feeds come directly from HERE (www.HERE.com). HERE collects billions of GPS and cell phone probe records per month and, where available, uses sensor and toll-tag data to augment the probe data collected. An advanced algorithm compiles the data and computes accurate speeds. The real-time and predictive traffic data is updated every five minutes through traffic feeds.Data coverageThe service works globally and can be used to visualize traffic speeds and incidents in many countries. Check the service coverage web map to determine availability in your area of interest. Look at the coverage map to learn whether a country currently supports traffic. The support for traffic incidents can be determined by identifying a country. For detailed information on this service, visit the directions and routing documentation and the ArcGIS Help.SymbologyTraffic speeds are displayed as a percentage of free-flow speeds, which is frequently the speed limit or how fast cars tend to travel when unencumbered by other vehicles. The streets are color coded as follows:Green (fast): 85 - 100% of free flow speedsYellow (moderate): 65 - 85%Orange (slow); 45 - 65%Red (stop and go): 0 - 45%To view live traffic only—that is, excluding typical traffic conditions—enable the Live Traffic layer and disable the Traffic layer. (You can find these layers under World/Traffic > [region] > [region] Traffic). To view more comprehensive traffic information that includes live and typical conditions, disable the Live Traffic layer and enable the Traffic layer.ArcGIS Online organization subscriptionImportant Note:The World Traffic map service is available for users with an ArcGIS Online organizational subscription. To access this map service, you'll need to sign in with an account that is a member of an organizational subscription. If you don't have an organizational subscription, you can create a new account and then sign up for a 30-day trial of ArcGIS Online.

  10. Share of web traffic in Ghana 2025, by search engine

    • flwrdeptvarieties.store
    • statista.com
    Updated Dec 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Doris Dokua Sasu (2023). Share of web traffic in Ghana 2025, by search engine [Dataset]. https://flwrdeptvarieties.store/?_=%2Ftopics%2F10270%2Fe-commerce-in-ghana%2F%23zUpilBfjadnL7vc%2F8wIHANZKd8oHtis%3D
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Authors
    Doris Dokua Sasu
    Area covered
    Ghana
    Description

    In February 2025, Google was the search engine with the most referrals to webpages in Ghana. It accounted for over 97 percent of the web traffic in the country. This was followed by Bing and Yahoo!, with 2.4 percent and 0.1 percent of the traffic, respectively.

  11. o

    Who can spot fake news? Testing perception versus reality with survey,...

    • osf.io
    url
    Updated May 8, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Andrew Guess; Benjamin Lyons; Jacob Montgomery; Brendan J. Nyhan; Jason Reifler (2023). Who can spot fake news? Testing perception versus reality with survey, experiment, and web traffic data [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/FR4K5
    Explore at:
    urlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 8, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Center For Open Science
    Authors
    Andrew Guess; Benjamin Lyons; Jacob Montgomery; Brendan J. Nyhan; Jason Reifler
    Description

    No description was included in this Dataset collected from the OSF

  12. a

    Traffic

    • open-data-cgvar.hub.arcgis.com
    • ps-dubai.hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Mar 11, 2014
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Conseil Départemental du Var (2014). Traffic [Dataset]. https://open-data-cgvar.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/traffic
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2014
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Conseil Départemental du Var
    License

    http://opendata.regionpaca.fr/fileadmin//user_upload/tx_ausyopendata/licences/Licence-Ouverte-Open-Licence-ETALAB.pdfhttp://opendata.regionpaca.fr/fileadmin//user_upload/tx_ausyopendata/licences/Licence-Ouverte-Open-Licence-ETALAB.pdf

    Area covered
    Description

    The map layers in this service provide color-coded maps of the traffic conditions you can expect for the present time (the default). The map shows present traffic as a blend of live and typical information. Live speeds are used wherever available and are established from real-time sensor readings. Typical speeds come from a record of average speeds, which are collected over several weeks within the last year or so. Layers also show current incident locations where available. By changing the map time, the service can also provide past and future conditions. Live readings from sensors are saved for 12 hours, so setting the map time back within 12 hours allows you to see a actual recorded traffic speeds, supplemented with typical averages by default. You can choose to turn off the average speeds and see only the recorded live traffic speeds for any time within the 12-hour window. Predictive traffic conditions are shown for any time in the future.The color-coded traffic map layer can be used to represent relative traffic speeds; this is a common type of a map for online services and is used to provide context for routing, navigation, and field operations. A color-coded traffic map can be requested for the current time and any time in the future. A map for a future request might be used for planning purposes.The map also includes dynamic traffic incidents showing the location of accidents, construction, closures, and other issues that could potentially impact the flow of traffic. Traffic incidents are commonly used to provide context for routing, navigation and field operations. Incidents are not features; they cannot be exported and stored for later use or additional analysis.Data sourceEsri’s typical speed records and live and predictive traffic feeds come directly from HERE (www.HERE.com). HERE collects billions of GPS and cell phone probe records per month and, where available, uses sensor and toll-tag data to augment the probe data collected. An advanced algorithm compiles the data and computes accurate speeds. The real-time and predictive traffic data is updated every five minutes through traffic feeds.Data coverageThe service works globally and can be used to visualize traffic speeds and incidents in many countries. Check the service coverage web map to determine availability in your area of interest. Look at the coverage map to learn whether a country currently supports traffic. The support for traffic incidents can be determined by identifying a country. For detailed information on this service, visit the directions and routing documentation and the ArcGIS Help.SymbologyTraffic speeds are displayed as a percentage of free-flow speeds, which is frequently the speed limit or how fast cars tend to travel when unencumbered by other vehicles. The streets are color coded as follows:Green (fast): 85 - 100% of free flow speedsYellow (moderate): 65 - 85%Orange (slow); 45 - 65%Red (stop and go): 0 - 45%To view live traffic only—that is, excluding typical traffic conditions—enable the Live Traffic layer and disable the Traffic layer. (You can find these layers under World/Traffic > [region] > [region] Traffic). To view more comprehensive traffic information that includes live and typical conditions, disable the Live Traffic layer and enable the Traffic layer.ArcGIS Online organization subscriptionImportant Note:The World Traffic map service is available for users with an ArcGIS Online organizational subscription. To access this map service, you'll need to sign in with an account that is a member of an organizational subscription. If you don't have an organizational subscription, you can create a new account and then sign up for a 30-day trial of ArcGIS Online.

  13. Global share of human and bot web traffic 2013-2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Dec 10, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Global share of human and bot web traffic 2013-2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1264226/human-and-bot-web-traffic-share/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 10, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    In 2023, most of the global website traffic was still generated by humans but bot traffic is constantly growing. Fraudulent traffic through bad bot actors accounted for 32 percent of global web traffic in the most recently measured period, representing an increase of 1.8 percent from the previous year. Sophistication of Bad Bots on the rise The complexity of malicious bot activity has dramatically increased in recent years. Advanced bad bots have doubled in prevalence over the past two years, indicating a surge in the sophistication of cyber threats. Simultaneously, simple bad bots saw a 6 percent increase compared to the previous year, suggesting a shift in the landscape of automated threats. Meanwhile, areas like entertainment, and law & government face the highest amount of advanced bad bots, with more than 78 percent of their bot traffic affected by evasive applications. Good and bad bots across industries The impact of bot traffic varies across different sectors. Bad bots accounted for over 57.2 percent of the gaming segment's web traffic. Meanwhile, almost half of the online traffic for telecom and ISPs was moved by malicious applications. However, not all bot traffic is considered bad. Some of these applications help index websites for search engines or monitor website performance, assisting users throughout their online search. Therefore, areas like entertainment, food and groceries, and financial services experienced notable levels of good bot traffic, demonstrating the diverse applications of benign automated systems across different sectors.

  14. Top online traffic sources for beauty e-commerce in Europe 2024

    • flwrdeptvarieties.store
    • statista.com
    Updated Jan 16, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista Research Department (2025). Top online traffic sources for beauty e-commerce in Europe 2024 [Dataset]. https://flwrdeptvarieties.store/?_=%2Ftopics%2F12547%2Fbeauty-shopping-on-social-media%2F%23zUpilBfjadnL7vc%2F8wIHANZKd8oHtis%3D
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 16, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Authors
    Statista Research Department
    Description

    In 2024, most of the online traffic leading to beauty and personal care e-commerce sites in Europe came from direct search. Search accounted for around 65 percent of traffic to beauty and personal sites. Furthermore, social media platforms generated about 30 percent of the traffic.

  15. Repository Analytics and Metrics Portal (RAMP) 2019 data

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • zenodo.org
    zip
    Updated Jul 14, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jonathan Wheeler; Kenning Arlitsch (2021). Repository Analytics and Metrics Portal (RAMP) 2019 data [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.crjdfn342
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 14, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    University of New Mexico
    Montana State University
    Authors
    Jonathan Wheeler; Kenning Arlitsch
    License

    https://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html

    Description

    Version update: The originally uploaded versions of the CSV files in this dataset included an extra column, "Unnamed: 0," which is not RAMP data and was an artifact of the process used to export the data to CSV format. This column has been removed from the revised dataset. The data are otherwise the same as in the first version.

    The Repository Analytics and Metrics Portal (RAMP) is a web service that aggregates use and performance use data of institutional repositories. The data are a subset of data from RAMP, the Repository Analytics and Metrics Portal (http://rampanalytics.org), consisting of data from all participating repositories for the calendar year 2019. For a description of the data collection, processing, and output methods, please see the "methods" section below.

    Methods

    Data Collection

    RAMP data are downloaded for participating IR from Google Search Console (GSC) via the Search Console API. The data consist of aggregated information about IR pages which appeared in search result pages (SERP) within Google properties (including web search and Google Scholar).

    Data are downloaded in two sets per participating IR. The first set includes page level statistics about URLs pointing to IR pages and content files. The following fields are downloaded for each URL, with one row per URL:

    url: This is returned as a 'page' by the GSC API, and is the URL of the page which was included in an SERP for a Google property.
    impressions: The number of times the URL appears within the SERP.
    clicks: The number of clicks on a URL which took users to a page outside of the SERP.
    clickThrough: Calculated as the number of clicks divided by the number of impressions.
    position: The position of the URL within the SERP.
    date: The date of the search.
    

    Following data processing describe below, on ingest into RAMP a additional field, citableContent, is added to the page level data.

    The second set includes similar information, but instead of being aggregated at the page level, the data are grouped based on the country from which the user submitted the corresponding search, and the type of device used. The following fields are downloaded for combination of country and device, with one row per country/device combination:

    country: The country from which the corresponding search originated.
    device: The device used for the search.
    impressions: The number of times the URL appears within the SERP.
    clicks: The number of clicks on a URL which took users to a page outside of the SERP.
    clickThrough: Calculated as the number of clicks divided by the number of impressions.
    position: The position of the URL within the SERP.
    date: The date of the search.
    

    Note that no personally identifiable information is downloaded by RAMP. Google does not make such information available.

    More information about click-through rates, impressions, and position is available from Google's Search Console API documentation: https://developers.google.com/webmaster-tools/search-console-api-original/v3/searchanalytics/query and https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/7042828?hl=en

    Data Processing

    Upon download from GSC, the page level data described above are processed to identify URLs that point to citable content. Citable content is defined within RAMP as any URL which points to any type of non-HTML content file (PDF, CSV, etc.). As part of the daily download of page level statistics from Google Search Console (GSC), URLs are analyzed to determine whether they point to HTML pages or actual content files. URLs that point to content files are flagged as "citable content." In addition to the fields downloaded from GSC described above, following this brief analysis one more field, citableContent, is added to the page level data which records whether each page/URL in the GSC data points to citable content. Possible values for the citableContent field are "Yes" and "No."

    The data aggregated by the search country of origin and device type do not include URLs. No additional processing is done on these data. Harvested data are passed directly into Elasticsearch.

    Processed data are then saved in a series of Elasticsearch indices. Currently, RAMP stores data in two indices per participating IR. One index includes the page level data, the second index includes the country of origin and device type data.

    About Citable Content Downloads

    Data visualizations and aggregations in RAMP dashboards present information about citable content downloads, or CCD. As a measure of use of institutional repository content, CCD represent click activity on IR content that may correspond to research use.

    CCD information is summary data calculated on the fly within the RAMP web application. As noted above, data provided by GSC include whether and how many times a URL was clicked by users. Within RAMP, a "click" is counted as a potential download, so a CCD is calculated as the sum of clicks on pages/URLs that are determined to point to citable content (as defined above).

    For any specified date range, the steps to calculate CCD are:

    Filter data to only include rows where "citableContent" is set to "Yes."
    Sum the value of the "clicks" field on these rows.
    

    Output to CSV

    Published RAMP data are exported from the production Elasticsearch instance and converted to CSV format. The CSV data consist of one "row" for each page or URL from a specific IR which appeared in search result pages (SERP) within Google properties as described above. Also as noted above, daily data are downloaded for each IR in two sets which cannot be combined. One dataset includes the URLs of items that appear in SERP. The second dataset is aggregated by combination of the country from which a search was conducted and the device used.

    As a result, two CSV datasets are provided for each month of published data:

    page-clicks:

    The data in these CSV files correspond to the page-level data, and include the following fields:

    url: This is returned as a 'page' by the GSC API, and is the URL of the page which was included in an SERP for a Google property.
    impressions: The number of times the URL appears within the SERP.
    clicks: The number of clicks on a URL which took users to a page outside of the SERP.
    clickThrough: Calculated as the number of clicks divided by the number of impressions.
    position: The position of the URL within the SERP.
    date: The date of the search.
    citableContent: Whether or not the URL points to a content file (ending with pdf, csv, etc.) rather than HTML wrapper pages. Possible values are Yes or No.
    index: The Elasticsearch index corresponding to page click data for a single IR.
    repository_id: This is a human readable alias for the index and identifies the participating repository corresponding to each row. As RAMP has undergone platform and version migrations over time, index names as defined for the previous field have not remained consistent. That is, a single participating repository may have multiple corresponding Elasticsearch index names over time. The repository_id is a canonical identifier that has been added to the data to provide an identifier that can be used to reference a single participating repository across all datasets. Filtering and aggregation for individual repositories or groups of repositories should be done using this field.
    

    Filenames for files containing these data end with “page-clicks”. For example, the file named 2019-01_RAMP_all_page-clicks.csv contains page level click data for all RAMP participating IR for the month of January, 2019.

    country-device-info:

    The data in these CSV files correspond to the data aggregated by country from which a search was conducted and the device used. These include the following fields:

    country: The country from which the corresponding search originated.
    device: The device used for the search.
    impressions: The number of times the URL appears within the SERP.
    clicks: The number of clicks on a URL which took users to a page outside of the SERP.
    clickThrough: Calculated as the number of clicks divided by the number of impressions.
    position: The position of the URL within the SERP.
    date: The date of the search.
    index: The Elasticsearch index corresponding to country and device access information data for a single IR.
    repository_id: This is a human readable alias for the index and identifies the participating repository corresponding to each row. As RAMP has undergone platform and version migrations over time, index names as defined for the previous field have not remained consistent. That is, a single participating repository may have multiple corresponding Elasticsearch index names over time. The repository_id is a canonical identifier that has been added to the data to provide an identifier that can be used to reference a single participating repository across all datasets. Filtering and aggregation for individual repositories or groups of repositories should be done using this field.
    

    Filenames for files containing these data end with “country-device-info”. For example, the file named 2019-01_RAMP_all_country-device-info.csv contains country and device data for all participating IR for the month of January, 2019.

    References

    Google, Inc. (2021). Search Console APIs. Retrieved from https://developers.google.com/webmaster-tools/search-console-api-original.

  16. Puerto Rico: web traffic share of search engines 2020

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 4, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2023). Puerto Rico: web traffic share of search engines 2020 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1197642/puerto-rico-web-traffic-share-search-engines/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 4, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jan 2020 - Dec 2020
    Area covered
    Puerto Rico
    Description

    In 2020, Google was the most popular online search engine in Puerto Rico, accounting for approximately 91.7 percent of web traffic. It was followed by Microsoft's Bing, with a 4.8 percent share that year. In addition, Google also concentrated most of the web traffic in the Dominican Republic.

  17. a

    Trafic routier tps réel

    • site-collab-cgvar.hub.arcgis.com
    • hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Mar 11, 2014
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Conseil Départemental du Var (2014). Trafic routier tps réel [Dataset]. https://site-collab-cgvar.hub.arcgis.com/maps/f35c1b885e1043bc8482e3cfe43819d7
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2014
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Conseil Départemental du Var
    License

    http://opendata.regionpaca.fr/fileadmin//user_upload/tx_ausyopendata/licences/Licence-Ouverte-Open-Licence-ETALAB.pdfhttp://opendata.regionpaca.fr/fileadmin//user_upload/tx_ausyopendata/licences/Licence-Ouverte-Open-Licence-ETALAB.pdf

    Area covered
    Description

    The map layers in this service provide color-coded maps of the traffic conditions you can expect for the present time (the default). The map shows present traffic as a blend of live and typical information. Live speeds are used wherever available and are established from real-time sensor readings. Typical speeds come from a record of average speeds, which are collected over several weeks within the last year or so. Layers also show current incident locations where available. By changing the map time, the service can also provide past and future conditions. Live readings from sensors are saved for 12 hours, so setting the map time back within 12 hours allows you to see a actual recorded traffic speeds, supplemented with typical averages by default. You can choose to turn off the average speeds and see only the recorded live traffic speeds for any time within the 12-hour window. Predictive traffic conditions are shown for any time in the future.The color-coded traffic map layer can be used to represent relative traffic speeds; this is a common type of a map for online services and is used to provide context for routing, navigation, and field operations. A color-coded traffic map can be requested for the current time and any time in the future. A map for a future request might be used for planning purposes.The map also includes dynamic traffic incidents showing the location of accidents, construction, closures, and other issues that could potentially impact the flow of traffic. Traffic incidents are commonly used to provide context for routing, navigation and field operations. Incidents are not features; they cannot be exported and stored for later use or additional analysis.Data sourceEsri’s typical speed records and live and predictive traffic feeds come directly from HERE (www.HERE.com). HERE collects billions of GPS and cell phone probe records per month and, where available, uses sensor and toll-tag data to augment the probe data collected. An advanced algorithm compiles the data and computes accurate speeds. The real-time and predictive traffic data is updated every five minutes through traffic feeds.Data coverageThe service works globally and can be used to visualize traffic speeds and incidents in many countries. Check the service coverage web map to determine availability in your area of interest. Look at the coverage map to learn whether a country currently supports traffic. The support for traffic incidents can be determined by identifying a country. For detailed information on this service, visit the directions and routing documentation and the ArcGIS Help.SymbologyTraffic speeds are displayed as a percentage of free-flow speeds, which is frequently the speed limit or how fast cars tend to travel when unencumbered by other vehicles. The streets are color coded as follows:Green (fast): 85 - 100% of free flow speedsYellow (moderate): 65 - 85%Orange (slow); 45 - 65%Red (stop and go): 0 - 45%To view live traffic only—that is, excluding typical traffic conditions—enable the Live Traffic layer and disable the Traffic layer. (You can find these layers under World/Traffic > [region] > [region] Traffic). To view more comprehensive traffic information that includes live and typical conditions, disable the Live Traffic layer and enable the Traffic layer.ArcGIS Online organization subscriptionImportant Note:The World Traffic map service is available for users with an ArcGIS Online organizational subscription. To access this map service, you'll need to sign in with an account that is a member of an organizational subscription. If you don't have an organizational subscription, you can create a new account and then sign up for a 30-day trial of ArcGIS Online.

  18. Share of web traffic in Algeria 2023, by browser

    • statista.com
    Updated May 2, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Share of web traffic in Algeria 2023, by browser [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1303613/distribution-of-web-traffic-in-algeria-by-browser/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 2, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Nov 2023
    Area covered
    Algeria
    Description

    Chrome accounted for around 85 percent of the web traffic in Algeria in November 2023, representing the most popular browser in the country. Despite accounting for a significantly lower share, Safari was the second-leading browser used in Algeria, as it made up roughly 5.5 percent of the web traffic. Firefox followed, with a share of 2.6 percent.

  19. Chile: web traffic share of search engines 2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Oct 10, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Chile: web traffic share of search engines 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1099623/chile-web-traffic-share-search-engines/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 10, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Sep 2023
    Area covered
    Chile
    Description

    In September 2023, Google was the most popular online search engine in Chile with a market share of over 95 percent. Microsoft's Bing ranked second with 2.85 percent of share throughout that period. Furthermore, Google Chrome was used by approximately eight out of ten Chilean internet users.

  20. Colombia: web traffic share of search engines 2020

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 4, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2023). Colombia: web traffic share of search engines 2020 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1101108/colombia-web-traffic-share-search-engines/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 4, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Jan 2020 - Dec 2020
    Area covered
    Colombia
    Description

    Google was by far the most popular online search engine in Colombia in 2020, accounting for almost 98 percent of web traffic. Microsoft's Bing ranked second with slightly over one percent of share during the period. Moreover, Google Chrome concentrated most of the web traffic in Colombia.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2023). Share of web traffic in Morocco 2023, by search engine [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1365083/share-of-web-traffic-in-morocco-by-search-engine/
Organization logo

Share of web traffic in Morocco 2023, by search engine

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Feb 13, 2023
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Time period covered
Jan 2023
Area covered
Morocco
Description

In 2023, Google was the most used search engine in Morocco, accounting for around 97 percent of the web traffic. The next most used search engine was Bing, which made up approximately two percent of web traffic in Morocco. The number of people using the internet in Morocco stood at 31.6 million in 2022, the fourth highest amount of internet users in Africa.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu