In March 2024, search platform Google.com generated approximately 85.5 billion visits, down from 87 billion platform visits in October 2023. Google is a global search platform and one of the biggest online companies worldwide.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Code:
Packet_Features_Generator.py & Features.py
To run this code:
pkt_features.py [-h] -i TXTFILE [-x X] [-y Y] [-z Z] [-ml] [-s S] -j
-h, --help show this help message and exit -i TXTFILE input text file -x X Add first X number of total packets as features. -y Y Add first Y number of negative packets as features. -z Z Add first Z number of positive packets as features. -ml Output to text file all websites in the format of websiteNumber1,feature1,feature2,... -s S Generate samples using size s. -j
Purpose:
Turns a text file containing lists of incomeing and outgoing network packet sizes into separate website objects with associative features.
Uses Features.py to calcualte the features.
startMachineLearning.sh & machineLearning.py
To run this code:
bash startMachineLearning.sh
This code then runs machineLearning.py in a tmux session with the nessisary file paths and flags
Options (to be edited within this file):
--evaluate-only to test 5 fold cross validation accuracy
--test-scaling-normalization to test 6 different combinations of scalers and normalizers
Note: once the best combination is determined, it should be added to the data_preprocessing function in machineLearning.py for future use
--grid-search to test the best grid search hyperparameters - note: the possible hyperparameters must be added to train_model under 'if not evaluateOnly:' - once best hyperparameters are determined, add them to train_model under 'if evaluateOnly:'
Purpose:
Using the .ml file generated by Packet_Features_Generator.py & Features.py, this program trains a RandomForest Classifier on the provided data and provides results using cross validation. These results include the best scaling and normailzation options for each data set as well as the best grid search hyperparameters based on the provided ranges.
Data
Encrypted network traffic was collected on an isolated computer visiting different Wikipedia and New York Times articles, different Google search queres (collected in the form of their autocomplete results and their results page), and different actions taken on a Virtual Reality head set.
Data for this experiment was stored and analyzed in the form of a txt file for each experiment which contains:
First number is a classification number to denote what website, query, or vr action is taking place.
The remaining numbers in each line denote:
The size of a packet,
and the direction it is traveling.
negative numbers denote incoming packets
positive numbers denote outgoing packets
Figure 4 Data
This data uses specific lines from the Virtual Reality.txt file.
The action 'LongText Search' refers to a user searching for "Saint Basils Cathedral" with text in the Wander app.
The action 'ShortText Search' refers to a user searching for "Mexico" with text in the Wander app.
The .xlsx and .csv file are identical
Each file includes (from right to left):
The origional packet data,
each line of data organized from smallest to largest packet size in order to calculate the mean and standard deviation of each packet capture,
and the final Cumulative Distrubution Function (CDF) caluclation that generated the Figure 4 Graph.
According to the results of a survey conducted worldwide in 2023, nearly **** of responding digital marketers believed artificial intelligence (AI) would have a positive impact on website search traffic in the next five years. Some ** percent stated AI would have a neutral effect, while ** percent agreed that the technology would negatively impact search traffic.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Attributes of sites in Hamilton City which collect anonymised data from a sample of vehicles. Note: A Link is the section of the road between two sites
Column_InfoSite_Id, int : Unique identiferNumber, int : Asset number. Note: If the site is at a signalised intersection, Number will match 'Site_Number' in the table 'Traffic Signal Site Location'Is_Enabled, varchar : Site is currently enabledDisabled_Date, datetime : If currently disabled, the date at which the site was disabledSite_Name, varchar : Description of the site locationLatitude, numeric : North-south geographic coordinatesLongitude, numeric : East-west geographic coordinates
Relationship
Disclaimer
Hamilton City Council does not make any representation or give any warranty as to the accuracy or exhaustiveness of the data released for public download. Levels, locations and dimensions of works depicted in the data may not be accurate due to circumstances not notified to Council. A physical check should be made on all levels, locations and dimensions before starting design or works.
Hamilton City Council shall not be liable for any loss, damage, cost or expense (whether direct or indirect) arising from reliance upon or use of any data provided, or Council's failure to provide this data.
While you are free to crop, export and re-purpose the data, we ask that you attribute the Hamilton City Council and clearly state that your work is a derivative and not the authoritative data source. Please include the following statement when distributing any work derived from this data:
‘This work is derived entirely or in part from Hamilton City Council data; the provided information may be updated at any time, and may at times be out of date, inaccurate, and/or incomplete.'
In November 2024, Google.com was the most popular website worldwide with 136 billion average monthly visits. The online platform has held the top spot as the most popular website since June 2010, when it pulled ahead of Yahoo into first place. Second-ranked YouTube generated more than 72.8 billion monthly visits in the measured period. The internet leaders: search, social, and e-commerce Social networks, search engines, and e-commerce websites shape the online experience as we know it. While Google leads the global online search market by far, YouTube and Facebook have become the world’s most popular websites for user generated content, solidifying Alphabet’s and Meta’s leadership over the online landscape. Meanwhile, websites such as Amazon and eBay generate millions in profits from the sale and distribution of goods, making the e-market sector an integral part of the global retail scene. What is next for online content? Powering social media and websites like Reddit and Wikipedia, user-generated content keeps moving the internet’s engines. However, the rise of generative artificial intelligence will bring significant changes to how online content is produced and handled. ChatGPT is already transforming how online search is performed, and news of Google's 2024 deal for licensing Reddit content to train large language models (LLMs) signal that the internet is likely to go through a new revolution. While AI's impact on the online market might bring both opportunities and challenges, effective content management will remain crucial for profitability on the web.
https://scoop.market.us/privacy-policyhttps://scoop.market.us/privacy-policy
As of 2019, direct traffic accounts for the largest percentage of website traffic worldwide, with a share of 55 percent. Additionally, search traffic accounts for 29 percent of worldwide website traffic.
Digital technology and Internet use, website traffic strategies, by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and size of enterprise for Canada from 2012 to 2013.
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
The Google Merchandise Store sells Google branded merchandise. The data is typical of what you would see for an ecommerce website.
The sample dataset contains Google Analytics 360 data from the Google Merchandise Store, a real ecommerce store. The Google Merchandise Store sells Google branded merchandise. The data is typical of what you would see for an ecommerce website. It includes the following kinds of information:
Traffic source data: information about where website visitors originate. This includes data about organic traffic, paid search traffic, display traffic, etc. Content data: information about the behavior of users on the site. This includes the URLs of pages that visitors look at, how they interact with content, etc. Transactional data: information about the transactions that occur on the Google Merchandise Store website.
Fork this kernel to get started.
Banner Photo by Edho Pratama from Unsplash.
What is the total number of transactions generated per device browser in July 2017?
The real bounce rate is defined as the percentage of visits with a single pageview. What was the real bounce rate per traffic source?
What was the average number of product pageviews for users who made a purchase in July 2017?
What was the average number of product pageviews for users who did not make a purchase in July 2017?
What was the average total transactions per user that made a purchase in July 2017?
What is the average amount of money spent per session in July 2017?
What is the sequence of pages viewed?
For the purpose of monitoring its visitor centres, National Nature Reserves (NNR) and bike trails, Natural Resources Wales contracted Linetop LTD to provide data and reporting on visitor numbers.
Reports are produced quarterly and provide a breakdown of visitor numbers in each site and reserve. This data includes:
Site cards - which provide details of counter placements and specification.
Raw Count data - raw counts from sensors.
Reports - summary data provided as MS Word documents at regular intervals.
This metadata entry also covers the Grafana Chambers Electronics downloadable visitor counter data which is time stamp and number count data, which is affectively counting the same thing as the Linetop data.
In December 2024, social video platform YouTube recorded approximately ** billion visits on ****** and over ** billion visits from users on ******* devices. The web visitors traffic count from *********************** appeared consistently higher than the ******* visit count in the examined months.
The census count of vehicles on city streets is normally reported in the form of Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts. These counts provide a good estimate for the actual number of vehicles on an average weekday at select street segments. Specific block segments are selected for a count because they are deemed as representative of a larger segment on the same roadway. ADT counts are used by transportation engineers, economists, real estate agents, planners, and others professionals for planning and operational analysis. The frequency for each count varies depending on City staff’s needs for analysis in any given area. This report covers the counts taken in our City during the past 12 years approximately.
AADT represents current (most recent) Annual Average Daily Traffic on sampled road systems. This information is displayed using the Traffic Count Locations Active feature class as of the annual HPMS freeze in January. Historical AADT is found in another table. Please note that updates to this dataset are on an annual basis, therefore the data may not match ground conditions or may not be available for new roadways. Resource Contact: Christy Prentice, Traffic Forecasting & Analysis (TFA), http://www.dot.state.mn.us/tda/contacts.html#TFA
Check other metadata records in this package for more information on Annual Average Daily Traffic Locations Information.
Link to ESRI Feature Service:
Annual Average Daily Traffic Locations in Minnesota: Annual Average Daily Traffic Locations
A collection of historic traffic count data and guidelines for how to collect new data for Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) projects.
AADT represents current (most recent) Annual Average Daily Traffic on sampled road systems. This information is displayed using the Traffic Count Locations Active feature class as of the annual HPMS freeze in January. Historical AADT is found in another table. Please note that updates to this dataset are on an annual basis, therefore the data may not match ground conditions or may not be available for new roadways. Resource Contact: Christy Prentice, Traffic Forecasting & Analysis (TFA), http://www.dot.state.mn.us/tda/contacts.html#TFA
Check other metadata records in this package for more information on Annual Average Daily Traffic Locations Information.
Link to ESRI Feature Service:
Annual Average Daily Traffic Locations in Minnesota: Annual Average Daily Traffic Locations
Annual average daily traffic is the total volume for the year divided by 365 days. The traffic count year is from October 1st through September 30th. Very few locations in California are actually counted continuously. Traffic Counting is generally performed by electronic counting instruments moved from location throughout the State in a program of continuous traffic count sampling. The resulting counts are adjusted to an estimate of annual average daily traffic by compensating for seasonal influence, weekly variation and other variables which may be present. Annual ADT is necessary for presenting a statewide picture of traffic flow, evaluating traffic trends, computing accident rates. planning and designing highways and other purposes.Traffic Census Program Page
Between July and September 2022, BYJU's emerged as the top Ed Tech platform for K12 and test preparation In India. It recorded approximately *** million website visits. Following closely behind was Toppr.com, with around *** million visits during the same period.
The FDOT Annual Average Daily Traffic feature class provides spatial information on Annual Average Daily Traffic section breaks for the state of Florida. In addition, it provides affiliated traffic information like KFCTR, DFCTR and TFCTR among others. This dataset is maintained by the Transportation Data & Analytics office (TDA). The source spatial data for this hosted feature layer was created on: 07/12/2025.Download Data: Enter Guest as Username to download the source shapefile from here: https://ftp.fdot.gov/file/d/FTP/FDOT/co/planning/transtat/gis/shapefiles/aadt.zip
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
95%-CI: 95% confidence interval; GP: general practitionerSelf-reported satisfaction and applicability of the genetics website by general visitors and by GPs only.
https://www.caliper.com/license/maptitude-license-agreement.htmhttps://www.caliper.com/license/maptitude-license-agreement.htm
Average Annual Daily Traffic data for use with GIS mapping software, databases, and web applications are from Caliper Corporation and contain data on the total volume of vehicle traffic on a highway or road for a year divided by 365 days.
In March 2024, search platform Google.com generated approximately 85.5 billion visits, down from 87 billion platform visits in October 2023. Google is a global search platform and one of the biggest online companies worldwide.