Graph and download economic data for New Private Housing Units Authorized by Building Permits: 1-Unit Structures for Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI (MSA) (CHIC917BP1FHSA) from Jan 1988 to Apr 2025 about privately owned, Chicago, 1-unit structures, IL, permits, IN, family, buildings, WI, housing, and USA.

In the first quarter of 2025, San Francisco, Chicago, New York, and Honolulu were some of the U.S. cities with the highest housing construction costs. Meanwhile, Phoenix had one of the lowest construction costs for high-end multifamily homes at 190 U.S. dollars per square foot and Las Vegas for single-family homes between 240 and 480 U.S. dollars per square foot. Construction cost disparities As seen here, the construction cost for a high-end multi-family home in San Francisco in the first quarter of 2024 was over twice more expensive than in Phoenix. Meanwhile, there were also great differences in the cost of building a single-family house in New York and in Portland or Seattle. Some factors that may cause these disparities are the construction materials, installation, and composite costs, differing land values, wages, etc. For example, although the price of construction materials in the U.S. was rising at a slower level than in 2022 and 2023, several materials that are essential in most construction projects had growth rates of over five percent in 2024. Growing industry revenue Despite the economic uncertainty and other challenges, the size of the private construction market in the U.S. rose during the past years. It is important to consider that supply and demand for housing influences the revenue of this segment of the construction market. On the supply side, single-family home construction fell in 2023, but it is expected to rise in 2024 and 2025. On the demand side, some of the U.S. metropolitan areas with the highest sale prices of single-family homes were located in California, with San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara at the top of the ranking.

Residential building permits in United States were in short demand in 2018, rising only 2.8 percent across the country. Many large cities have reduced the number of residential building permits, such as Chicago, which handed out 22 percent less permits in 2018 than the previous year. Building permits may specifically apply to large housing units with multiple living spaces, to single family houses. Before construction can begin on any new or existing building, a permit must be obtained from the appropriate city council. Building permit numbers have increased significantly in both Houston, Texas and Orlando, Florida metro areas, with 34.5 and 51.5 percent more permits issued in 2018 than 2017, respectively.

Homes are where the heat is Generally speaking, the construction of new homes can be a good indicator of how local economies are fairing, as it can mean that individuals have acquired enough wealth to own their own home or businesses are expanding. The 2018 residential building permit figures provide some insight into the current demographic of cities, particularly with regards to the job market. For instance, in the „snowbird“state of Florida, 45 percent of new residents in Orlando were between ages 25 and 54, and presumably their careers still play a large role. Orlando-Kissimmee-Sandford metro area is within close range of engineering firms such as Lockheed Martin, as well as new tech companies, which offer higher salaries and better prospects than other industries. Florida unemployment continues to decline and dropped to 3.6 percent in 2018.
Incidentally, cities that tend to be popular for Americans in their early twenties, tend to be the cities that are reducing their number of new residential building permits (Chicago, Illinois; New York, New York; and Los Angeles, California). But this does not mean that these cities are in financial trouble. Chicago’s GDP is steadily growing and unemployment in Illinois was at 4.3 percent in 2018. Bigger and denser cities tend to attract younger groups as they can walk from location to location and remain amongst the excitement that cities have to offer.

Graph and download economic data for New Private Housing Structures Authorized by Building Permits for Cook County, IL (BPPRIV017031) from 1990 to 2024 about Cook County, IL; Chicago; IL; permits; buildings; private; housing; and USA.

Chicago Housing Authority (CHA) is undertaking the construction of a residential community in Chicago, Illinois, the US.The project involves the construction of residential community with around 1,116 housing units across 12.9ha of land. It will be implemented in three phases.The first phase worth US$75 million includes the redevelopment of buildings north of Diversey Parkway.The project includes the construction of a revamped riverwalk, new landscaping, a convenience store, a coffee shop, a sports pub, a pet daycare facility, a clubhouse, a spa, a swimming pool, parking spaces and related facilities.In January 2010, CHA issued a request for qualifications (RFQ) for selecting a master developer and a team to revitalize the area.In December 2011, a team of five industry-leading Chicago-based real estate developers has been selected to revitalize the 72-year-old Lathrop Homes development on Chicago’s Near North Side.Lathrop Community Partners was named as master developer for the project by CHA and the Lathrop Homes Working Group. The team includes Related Midwest, Magellan Development Group, Heartland Housing Inc., Bickerdike Redevelopment Corp and Ardmore Associates. In 2012, a series of public hearings were held by the developers to announce a formal redevelopment plan.In August 2013, the master developers have issued a final draft of the redevelopment plan with three possible scenarios for community discussions.The Lathrop Homes planning and design team includes Studio Gang Architects, bKL Architecture, Farr Associates, Wolff Landscape Architects, and Bauer Latoza Studio.In August 2014, the developer team unveiled initial rendering for the redevelopment master plan with two buildings designed by bKL Architecture. The new six-story buildings are located at the Northwest and Southwest corners of Diversey, Clybourn and Damen Avenues and will include studio, one- and two-bedroom apartments. The Northern and Southern cover 8,249.79m2 and 12,727.71m2 area each.In February 2016, CHA secured approvals from Chicago Planning Commission.CHA secured approvals from Chicago City Council’s Zoning Committee in March 2016.In June 2016, CHA dropped the construction of two mid-rise buildings designed by bKL Architecture at the eastern edge from the project plan.In January 2017, CHA secured approval from the Chicago Planning Commission for construction of the first phase.In June 2017, the city council granted a construction permit to Related Midwest for the six-story building with 59 residential units.Groundbreaking ceremony is scheduled to commence in October 2017 Read More

The rental housing developments listed below are among the thousands of affordable units that are supported by City of Chicago programs to maintain affordability in local neighborhoods. The list is updated periodically when construction is completed for new projects or when the compliance period for older projects expire, typically after 30 years. The list is provided as a courtesy to the public. It does not include every City-assisted affordable housing unit that may be available for rent, nor does it include the hundreds of thousands of naturally occurring affordable housing units located throughout Chicago without City subsidies. For information on rents, income requirements and availability for the projects listed, contact each property directly. For information on other affordable rental properties in Chicago and Illinois, call (877) 428-8844, or visit www.ILHousingSearch.org.

TO4 Task 3.1 - K Hovnanian Chicago, IL DOE Challenge Home Program Certified Home Constructed and Verified Specifications DOE Challenge Home Building envelope Ceiling R-49 blown fiberglass, Grade I Walls 2x4 framing @ 16 o.c. with R-13 fiberglass batts, Grade I and 1"" R-5 extruded polystyrene (XPS) insulating sheathing Frame Floors R-38 blown fiberglass, Grade I Basement Walls R-19 fiberglass batts draped full height, Grade I Basement Slab uninsulated Windows Above Grade: ENERGY STAR certified, U=0.29, SHGC=0.28 Basement: Non ENERGY STAR certified, U=0.29, SHGC=0.24 Infiltration 2 ACH 50 Mechanical systems Heat 95% AFUE sealed combustion natural gas furnace in conditioned space Goodman GMH950703BXAF Cooling 13 SEER split system Goodman GSX130301BC DHW AO Smith Vertex 100 0.96 EF natural gas tank water heater in 2nd floor utility closet Hot Water Distribution Redesigned trunk and branch Compliant with EPA WaterSense Efficient Distribution Requirements Ducts Located 100% in conditioned space via floor joists leak free to outside (5% or less) Ventilation Central Fan Integrated Supply (CFIS) ventilation with 6"" insulated outside air duct Fan Controller: Air Cycler FRV, with 6"" motorized damper 50 CFM outside air flow, 33% duty cycle (10 minutes on, 20 minutes off); ASHRAE 62.2-2010 compliance via an exhaust fan - Panasonic FV-08VQ5 WhisperCeiling Rerturn Pathways Active Return at Master Bedroom Transfer Grilles in Secondary Bedrooms Appliances, Lighting, MELs Lights 80% ENERGY STAR certified CFL Appliances ENERGY STAR certified refrigerator, dishwasher, and clothes washer; Natural gas range/oven and clothes dryer" STRUCTURE - Test House Lot 145 - 2013 DOE Challenge Test House Task 3.1 Bolingbrook, IL 60490 House is constructed and is DOE Challenge Verified by Don Nelson, a local rater. The purpose of this project was to evaluate integrated packages of advanced measures in individual test homes to assess their performance with respect to Building America Program goals, specifically compliance with the DOE Challenge Home Program. To that end, Building Science Corporation (BSC) consulted on the construction of five test houses by three cold climate production builders in three separate U.S. cities. (1) K. Hovnanian Homes, Chicago, Illinois (2) David Weekley Homes, Denver, Colorado (3) Transformations, Inc., Devens, Massachusetts. Overall, the builders have concluded that the energy related upgrades (either through the prescriptive or performance path) represent reasonable upgrades. The builders commented that while not every improvement in specification was cost effective (as in a reasonable payback period), many were improvements that could improve the marketability of the homes and serve to attract more energy efficiency discerning prospective homeowners. However, the builders did express reservations about the associated checklists and added certifications. An increase in administrative time was observed with all builders. The checklists and certifications also inherently increase cost due to: (1) Adding services to the scope of work for various trades, such as HERS Rater and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning contractor. (2) Increased material costs related to the checklists, especially the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Indoor airPLUS and WaterSense Efficient Hot Water Distribution requirement. Ceiling - 18" cellulose Walls - 12" open cell spray foam in double stud walls Foundation - R-10 under slab, 3 1/2" closed-cell spray foam at walls Windows - Harvey U=0.20, SHGC=0.22 Infiltration - 1.0 sq in per 100 sq ft Heating - Mini split heat pump, 10.6 HSPF, 23 SEER Cooling - Mini split heat pump, 10.6 HSPF, 23 SEER DHW - 0.97 EF instantaneous propane water heater Ventilation - bathroom exhaust fans as basic option, HRV upgrade option Adams Circle Devens MA 01434 Cavite Street Devens, MA 01434

The global construction site preparation equipment market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing number of infrastructure projects worldwide and a rising demand for efficient and technologically advanced equipment. The market, valued at approximately $15 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 6% from 2025 to 2033. This growth is fueled by several key factors, including urbanization, expanding construction activities in developing economies, and government initiatives promoting infrastructure development. The residential segment currently holds a significant market share, but the commercial sector is expected to experience faster growth due to large-scale projects and the need for specialized equipment. Technological advancements, such as automation and the integration of GPS technology, are further enhancing the efficiency and precision of site preparation equipment, boosting market demand. However, factors like fluctuating raw material prices, stringent emission regulations, and the potential impact of economic downturns pose challenges to market expansion. The increasing adoption of sustainable construction practices and the demand for fuel-efficient equipment are also shaping market trends. Key players in the market are focusing on innovation, strategic partnerships, and mergers and acquisitions to consolidate their market positions and expand their product portfolios. The market segmentation reveals significant potential across various product types and applications. Walk-behind tillers and handheld trimmers dominate the residential segment, while larger equipment is in higher demand in commercial applications. The regional distribution of the market indicates strong growth potential in Asia-Pacific and North America, driven by extensive infrastructure development plans. Europe also presents a significant market, while Middle East & Africa and South America are showing gradual but steady expansion. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of established players and emerging companies. These companies are increasingly emphasizing customization and offering specialized equipment to meet specific customer needs and project requirements. Overall, the construction site preparation equipment market is poised for continued growth, driven by favorable global trends and technological advancements. The market's segmentation provides diverse opportunities for both established players and new entrants.

The American Housing Survey (AHS) collects data on the Nation's housing, including apartments, single-family homes, mobile homes, vacant homes, family composition, income, housing and neighborhood quality, housing costs, equipment, fuels, size of housing unit, and recent movers. National data are collected every other year, from a fixed sample of about 50,000 homes, plus new construction each year. In some metropolitan areas there are additional samples every 4-6 years, to measure local conditions. The 1995 National File includes extra cases to allow separate analyses of 6 Metropolitan Areas: Chicago, Detroit, Los Angeles, New York, Northern NJ, and Philadelphia. The weights have been set to give good data for both National and local studies.