The child daycare industry has navigated various challenges, including labor shortages and fluctuating demand patterns. Parents increasingly recognize the value of early childhood education, spurring demand for developmental programs. Back-to-office working conditions have also heightened the need for childcare, especially for families with both parents participating in the workforce. This heightened demand offers growth opportunities, but it is coupled with financial pressures like the need to provide competitive wages to attract qualified staff. Revenue has been growing at a CAGR of 3.4% to an estimated $74.7 billion over the five years through 2025 despite an expected 0.0% rate change in 2025. Over the past five years, the sector's profitability has felt the impact of rising operational costs, particularly in labor. Competition for labor has meant higher wages, eroding profit and challenging centers to balance budgets. Smaller providers have struggled with limited financial flexibility, relying heavily on tuition to meet operating costs. In contrast, larger organizations face the burden of elevated professional fees and rental expenses, impacting revenue shares. Meanwhile, essential supply purchases have stayed minimal and marketing costs remain low, allowing centers to direct resources toward pressing financial obligations. A robust economy and government support promise to transform the sector in the next five years. As financial stability allows families to prioritize quality care, providers must raise standards and innovate offerings to remain competitive. The shift toward structured educational environments in centers will push businesses to incorporate advanced curricula and training methods. Increased female workforce participation will demand flexible service options, while government funding could expand accessibility and improve facilities. Advancements in security and health monitoring will likely become industry norms, attracting safety-conscious parents. As businesses adapt to these changes, they will shape a more resilient, dynamic care landscape, positioning for sustained growth amid competition. Revenue is expected to grow at a CAGR of 1.0%, reaching $78.4 billion by 2030.

The global Preschool or Child Care market was valued at USD 6.1 billion in 2022 and is projected to reach USD 15.7 billion by 2030, registering a CAGR of 12.5 % for the forecast period 2023-2030. Factors Affecting Preschool or Child Care Market Growth

Rising Number of Two Working Parent Families Favours the Market Growth

There has been witnessed a growing demand for childcare and preschool services. When both parents are working, families usually require reliable and high-quality care for their infants and children during work hours. This has resulted into a substantial increase in demand for childcare and preschools centres which provide a nurturing and safe environment for children while both the parents are at work. Moreover, parents these days seek not only care but also early childhood education for their infants and children, therefore, preschools have evolved themselves to offer structured learning experiences. This shift has resulted to a greater emphasis on age-appropriate curriculum which supports children's social, emotional, and cognitive development. Thus, this rise in demand has led to the expansion of the preschool market, thereby, new preschools and child care centres being opened to accommodate the needs of working parents'. Thus, an increase in families where both the parents are employed has majorly impacted the childcare and preschool market by fuelling the demand, encouraging innovation, highlighting the importance of early childhood education, and expanding offerings. Therefore, as workforce continues to evolve, the preschool and child care industry will be a crucial resource for working families and a vital part of children's early development.

Rising Parental Awareness and Emphasis on Early Childhood Education

Shortage of Skilled Human Resources Restrains the Growth of the Global Preschool and Child Care Market

Qualified and skilled educators are highly essential for offering high-quality education and care to children and infants. These educators play a vital role in implementing and designing developmentally appropriate curriculum, fostering children's holistic growth, and creating a nurturing environment. Therefore, scarcity of skilled staff can lead to a compromised educational experience and insufficient supervision, impacting the overall quality of child care and preschool services. Whereas child care centres and preschools need to maintain lower teacher-student ratio to ensure individual safety and attention. Shortage of skilled and qualified educators can lead to larger class size, which negatively impact the quality of engagement and interaction between children and teachers. It can hinder the ability to address the learning needs of individuals effectively. Apart from this, skilled educators are highly instrumental in developing effective and innovative teaching methodologies. Thus, shortage of qualifies and skilled staff can possibly limit the ability of child care centres and preschools to adapt to current new educational trends, and implement progressive teaching approaches. Thus, shortage of skilled and qualified human resources can prove to be a barrier to the growth and development of global preschool and child care market.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Preschool or Child Care Market

The outbreak of Covid-19 has witnessed a significant impact on Preschool or Child Care market growth. The pandemic increased the adoption of contactless solutions and technologies across several different sectors. Preschool or Child Care centres were negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. As, the entire nation was under lockdown, the parents of children too were at home. This resulted into decreased demand for preschool or child care centres during the pandemic. Post-pandemic as the regulations and restrictions were reduced, this industry began to evolve with a positive growth. The growth of this industry after the pandemic required a longer period of time. Overall, the global Preschool or Child Care market was negatively impacted by the pandemic. Introduction of Preschool or Child Care

Preschool or child care is referred to as nursery or pre-kindergarten school, which is an early childhood that is designed for young children before they step into formal schooling. The preschool serves as a strong and important foundation for a child's cognitive, physical, and emotional development. Preschool specifically caters to c...

Early childhood learning centers were supported through the current period's volatility and saw revenue growth despite headwinds. The COVID-19 pandemic brought mass layoffs and work-from-home policies, giving parents ample time to care for and teach their children and dampening demand for learning centers as childcare options. Still, early childhood education's market acceptance helped learning centers avoid more severe losses as parents still enrolled their children in half-day programs to promote social and academic development. Government backing more than made up for losses through the current period, and revenue has been climbing at a CAGR of 3.6% to an estimated $22.6 billion over the five years through 2024. In support of the staggering economy, the government stepped in with the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) in March 2021. By allocating nearly $40.0 billion to early childhood learning centers and childcare services, ARPA helped the industry retain employees amid slumping demand. Revenue accordingly skyrocketed in 2021, leading to a slight uptick in profit. Early childhood learning centers catering to lower-income communities have benefited from substantial funding increases for programs like Child Care Development Block Grants (CCDBGs), Head Start and universal prekindergarten. Funding will continue surging in 2024, and revenue is set to grow by 1.2% in 2024 alone. Learning centers are expected to face a steady revenue decline through the next period. Declining birth rates will shrink the market, making it difficult for early education centers to replace graduating classes. Internal competition will heat up as demand contracts, inciting tuition rate drops that strain profit. Rising unemployment rates will again give parents more time to care for their children, leading them to choose to teach them on their own or to send them to affordable half-day programs. Despite these challenges, the ongoing financial support from government programs like the Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) will help buoy early educators and stave off more serious losses. Early childhood learning centers' revenue is set to sink at a CAGR of 1.9% to $20.6 billion through the end of 2029.

Proportion of annual after-tax family income spent on child care, by economic family type and age of youngest child, Canada.

For many parents, child day-care centres are necessary, whether they need to use an after-school club to work longer hours, put their kids in care during holiday periods, or occasionally need help. From April 2024, parents of two-year-olds have been able to access 15 hours of childcare support, marking the beginning of the government’s awaited expansion of free childcare hours. As of September 2024, parents of children over nine months old can access 15 hours of free childcare. Children of eligible working parents over nine months will have 30 free hours of childcare a week by September 2025. However, centres have cast doubt on the feasibility of expanding free childcare hours as they struggle to grapple with costs (like rising minimum wages) and problems with retaining and recruiting staff. Over the five years through 2024-25, revenue is slated to rise at a compound annual rate of 1.3% to £5.9 billion. Forced closures, remote working and fear among parents regarding COVID-19 infection rates in childcare settings stifled requests for places over the two years through 2021-22. Since then, demand has bounced back, climbing up to pre-pandemic levels by 2022-23. While more parents having jobs is spurring demand, flexible at-home working has given parents more freedom, holding demand back slightly. Still, as child day-care centres continue to up prices to cover costs not alleviated by government funding, revenue is anticipated to grow by 2.9% in 2024-25. Revenue is expected to climb at a compound annual rate of 2.3% over the five years through 2029-30 to £6.6 billion. Expanding free childcare hours through September 2025 will heighten demand for day-care centre places. Government commitments to invest in wraparound childcare for school-aged children will give after-school clubs more support and drive revenue growth. As companies encourage employees to come into the office more, parents will have to seek more childcare options. Government funding for breakfast clubs at schools may cause revenue from before-school child care to dip in the short term. However, this creates opportunities for companies to form partnerships with schools to find a mutually beneficial solution to before-school childcare.

Childcare System Market size was valued at USD 1.4 Billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 6.8 Billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 30% from 2026-2032.

Major factors that are driving the market growth include a decrease in child mortality rate, increasing labor force participation of women, and positive government initiatives. Governments have a significant role in driving revenues for the global Childcare System Market. The implementation of stringent regulations by governments, coupled with increased funding to daycare centers, has helped parents, especially from low-income families. One of the major factors driving the growth of the Childcare System Market is the rise in the working women population. Changes in lifestyle as well as standard of living especially in developing economies have seen a surge in the women working for the population.

Global Childcare System Market Definition

Childcare system software is a tool that helps in managing the daily operations of daycare centers or preschools to save childcare time and make work and life easier. It is specifically designed for child care centers and other similar child-oriented facilities. The software supports, guides, and automates administrative tasks like parents' contact information database, scheduled appointments, attendance records, and children's health data management. The Childcare system saves time for childcare centers or pre-schools by automating administrative tasks such as invoicing, reporting, and admissions.

Most childcare software is interconnected with social media tools so that childcare centers can communicate with parents on social media through the software. For instance, Procare is a popular childcare software, which stores information regarding the child and their family. Childcare software can be either operated from local computers or via mobile if it has been given access to other systems running somewhere else. The system is mainly used to increase staff productivity by storing information regarding the child and family.

Early child care is an equally important and often overlooked component of child development. Child care providers can be children's first teachers and therefore play an integral role in systems of early childhood education. Quality care from a young age can have a substantial impact on the future successes of children. The main focus of the childcare system is on the development of the child, whether that be mental, social, or psychological.

Growing Demand for Childcare Services: Increasing workforce participation and changing family structures drive the need for childcare solutions.

Technological Advancements: Adoption of digital tools for managing enrollment, scheduling, and communication streamlines childcare operations.

Regulatory Compliance: Stringent regulations regarding safety, staffing ratios, and educational standards necessitate the adoption of comprehensive childcare systems.

Focus on Early Childhood Education: Rising awareness of the importance of early childhood education fuels demand for systems that support educational programming and developmental tracking.

Shift towards Flexible and Remote Work: The trend towards remote work increases the demand for flexible childcare options, driving the need for systems that enable remote monitoring and communication between parents and caregivers.

Children under 3 years of age with unmet need for child care centre services by income quintile per consumption unit. National.

This project was a mixed-method, multi-level study of low income families of children with special needs and the system which served them, focusing primarily on child care, employment, and balancing work and family. This approach included an analysis of existing national and state-level data sets, statewide surveys of parents and child care providers, and a field study to look at these issues at the local level in three selected communities in the state of Maine: Portland, Lewiston/Auburn, and Presque Isle. While the primary focus was on access to child care, this project also looked at the related issues of welfare reform, the impact of work force participation on having a child with special needs, and the issue of coordination of early intervention services with the child care system. The goal was to understand better the issues facing low income families with special needs children across the programs and policies affecting their employment, access to child care, and meeting the special needs of their children. In the first year of the study, qualitative research was conducted to learn directly from parents about their experiences. In the second and third years, a field study of three communities was conducted as well as statewide surveys and analysis of national data bases to supplement the data collected in the first year. This data collection is comprised of the two quantitative data files produced during the second and third years of the study which are described in more detail below. Child Care Provider Survey: The Child Care Provider Survey was a statewide survey of child care providers selected at random from the list of licensed providers in Maine given by the state licensing agency. Questions focused on the perspective of child care providers on the issues of access and inclusion that parents raised. Parent Survey: The Parent Survey was a statewide survey of parents and children aged 0-18 years with diagnosed special needs (enrolled in Maine Care - Katie Beckett and Title V eligibility groups - and Child Development Services early intervention caseloads). Questions focused on child care utilization and work experiences in relation to children with special needs. Researchers interested in information about the qualitative data should contact the Child Care and Children with Special Needs Project Web site.

Child Day Care Services Market Outlook

The global child day care services market size was valued at approximately USD 279.1 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 447.2 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.4% during the forecast period. This growth can be attributed to the increasing number of working parents around the globe who are in need of reliable day care services. The demand for quality child care services is further fueled by the rising awareness about the importance of early childhood education and development, as well as the supportive government policies and initiatives to enhance child care infrastructure. In addition, the shift towards dual-income households and the growing participation of women in the workforce are significant drivers of market growth.

The increasing urbanization and changes in family structures are also important growth drivers for the child day care services market. As more families move to urban areas, the demand for child care services rises due to the increase in nuclear family setups where both parents often work. This urban migration also reduces the availability of extended family members to provide care for children, thereby boosting the need for formal child care services. Furthermore, the growing recognition of child care as an integral part of a child's early development and education has led to an increased willingness among parents to invest in quality child care services, which in turn propels market growth.

Technological advancements are playing a pivotal role in transforming the child day care services market. The integration of technology in day care centers helps in enhancing the quality of services provided, ensuring safety, and improving communication with parents. Technologies such as surveillance cameras, mobile apps for real-time updates, and digital learning tools have become commonplace in modern child care settings. These advancements not only provide peace of mind to parents but also promote interactive learning experiences for children, thus driving the demand for technologically advanced child care services.

However, the child day care services market also faces several challenges. The high cost of quality child care services remains a significant barrier for many families, particularly those from low and middle-income groups. Additionally, the industry is grappling with the issue of staff shortages and high staff turnover rates, which can affect the quality of care and service delivery. Regulatory challenges and the need for compliance with stringent health and safety standards also pose challenges for day care providers. Despite these challenges, the market is expected to grow steadily, supported by various government initiatives aimed at making child care more accessible and affordable for all families.

In the evolving landscape of child day care services, Childcare Management Solutions have emerged as a vital component for streamlining operations and enhancing service quality. These solutions provide day care centers with tools to efficiently manage enrollment, billing, and communication with parents. By automating administrative tasks, child care providers can focus more on delivering quality care and educational experiences to children. The integration of management solutions also aids in maintaining compliance with regulatory standards, ensuring that centers operate smoothly and adhere to safety protocols. As the demand for child care services grows, the adoption of robust management solutions is becoming increasingly essential for providers aiming to stay competitive and meet the expectations of modern parents.

Service Type Analysis

The child day care services market is segmented into full-time care, part-time care, and drop-in care, each serving different needs of the market. Full-time care services are in high demand as they cater to working parents who require continuous care for their children throughout the workday. These services are often comprehensive, providing not only care but also educational and developmental activities designed to support early childhood growth. The steady rise in dual-income households is significantly contributing to the growth of the full-time care segment, with parents seeking reliable and consistent care solutions for their children.

Part-time care services, on the other hand, offer flexible options for parents who do not require full-time supervision for their children. This serv

Nursery schools' biggest challenge at the moment has been dubbed the "childcare cliff." As crucial American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding ended and additional appropriations were cut out of legislation, nursery schools inherited the cost of maintaining attractive salaries in an environment where inflation pushed workers' living expenses through the roof. Nursery schools are forced to cut staff and limit capacity or impose tuition hikes. Some nursery schools successfully passed some costs on as over half of US families lack meaningful access to licensed care, giving them little influence over nursery school prices. Still, underwhelming enrollment has exacerbated a labor shortage and weighed on profit as nursery schools struggle to offer enticing wages. Nursery schools that cater to middle-income families have especially struggled with the childcare cliff and labor shortage. Middle-class families squeezed by inflation have increasingly looked to alternative childcare instead of nursery schooling, forcing many schools to permanently close. On the other hand, higher-income families continue to seek formal childcare, and nursery schools in underprivileged communities still receive substantial federal assistance. The moderate success of high- and low-end nursery schools has offset others' challenges and kept revenue on the rise at a CAGR of 1.0% to an estimated $17.0 billion over the five years through 2024. Revenue is set to dip 1.7% in 2024 alone. Families will have more to spend on child care as earnings and per capita disposable income climb through the next period. Nursery schools that cater to high-income parents will leverage reduced price sensitivity to charge higher tuition and overcome labor-related issues. At the same time, falling interest rates will lead to job creation and rising employment, leaving fewer parents at home to care for their kids themselves. Some states, like Alabama and Idaho, are bolstering nursery schools by making up for the lack of federal funds, so continuing closures will vary by state. Still, nursery schools will face continued headwinds as birth rates decline in the US and the number of children in need of care shrinks. Revenue is set to swell at a CAGR of 0.5% to $17.4 billion through the end of 2029.

Children Day Care Services Market Outlook

The global children day care services market size was estimated at approximately USD 290 billion in 2023 and is expected to reach USD 410 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 3.8% from 2024 to 2032. The primary growth factor for this market is the increasing number of dual-income households, combined with a rising awareness about early childhood education and development.

One of the significant growth factors for the children day care services market is the increasing prevalence of dual-income families. As more households require both parents to work, the demand for reliable and professional child care services has surged. This trend is particularly pronounced in urban areas where the cost of living necessitates dual incomes. Consequently, day care centers are becoming a critical part of the community infrastructure, enabling parents to work without compromising the safety and development of their children.

Another key driver is the heightened awareness about the importance of early childhood education and development. Governments and educational organizations around the world are emphasizing the formative years of a child's life, which has led to increased investment in high-quality day care services. Parents are increasingly seeking day care solutions that offer not just custodial care but also educational programs that can aid in cognitive and social development. This shift in parental expectations has fueled the growth of specialized day care centers that offer a blend of care and early learning.

Technological advancements also play a crucial role in the market's expansion. Modern day care centers are integrating technology to offer better services, such as parent-teacher communication apps, live-streaming of classroom activities, and digital check-in systems. These innovations not only enhance the transparency and reliability of the services but also provide parents with peace of mind. Additionally, technology has enabled better management of day care operations, leading to increased efficiency and lower operational costs.

In the evolving landscape of child care services, the integration of Daycare Accounting Software has emerged as a pivotal advancement. This software streamlines financial operations, enabling day care centers to manage billing, payroll, and financial reporting with greater efficiency. By automating these processes, day care providers can focus more on delivering quality care and educational programs, rather than being bogged down by administrative tasks. The software also offers transparency to parents, providing them with detailed invoices and payment histories, which enhances trust and satisfaction. As day care centers continue to adopt technological solutions, Daycare Accounting Software is becoming an essential tool for maintaining financial health and operational efficiency.

The regional outlook for the children day care services market indicates robust growth across various geographies, with North America and Europe leading the market due to their well-established infrastructure and higher disposable incomes. The Asia-Pacific region is expected to witness the fastest growth, driven by rapid urbanization, increasing middle-class population, and growing awareness about early childhood education. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also showing promising growth, albeit at a slower pace compared to other regions, due to economic and infrastructural constraints.

Service Type Analysis

The children day care services market can be segmented by service type into full-time care, part-time care, after-school care, and others. Full-time care is the most extensively utilized service type, driven by the increasing number of working parents who need reliable child care solutions throughout the workday. Full-time care services are generally more comprehensive, offering a stable environment where children can participate in structured activities, receive meals, and enjoy outdoor playtime. This segment also benefits from higher revenue streams due to the premium pricing of full-day programs.

Part-time care services are gaining traction, especially among parents who work part-time or have flexible schedules. These services offer the flexibility that modern families need, allowing parents to choose care hours that align with their work and personal commitments. Part-time care often includes educational and recreati

This administrative dataset provides descriptive information about the families and children served through the federal Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF). CCDF dollars are provided to states, territories, and tribes to provide assistance to low-income families receiving or in transition from temporary public assistance, to obtain quality child care so they can work, or depending on their state's policy, to attend training or receive education. The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act of 1996 requires states and territories to collect information on all family units receiving assistance through the CCDF and to submit monthly case-level data to the Office of Child Care. States are permitted to report case-level data for the entire population, or a sample of the population, under approved sampling guidelines.

The Summary Records file contains monthly state-level summary information including the number of families served. The Family Records file contains family-level data including single parent status of the head of household, monthly co-payment amount, date on which child care assistance began, reasons for care (e.g., employment, training/education, protective services, etc.), income used to determine eligibility, source of income, and the family size on which eligibility is based. The Child Records file contains child-level data including ethnicity, race, and date of birth. The Setting Records file contains information about the type of child care setting, the total amount paid to the provider, and the total number of hours of care received by the child. The Pooling Factor file provides state-level data on the percentage of child care funds that is provided through the CCDF, the federal Head Start region the grantee (state) is in and is monitored by, and the state FIPS code for the grantee.

Units of Response: United States and Territories, CCDF Family Recipients, CCDF Children Recipients

Type of Data: Administrative

Tribal Data: No

Periodicity: Annual

Demographic Indicators: Ethnicity;Household Income;Household Size;Race

SORN: Not Applicable

Data Use Agreement: Not Applicable

Data Use Agreement Location: https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/rpxlogin

Granularity: Family;Individual

Spatial: United States

Geocoding: Tribe

The Child Day Care Services Market size was valued at USD 214.21 Billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 436.63 Billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 9.31% from 2026 to 2032.

Global Child Day Care Services Market Drivers

Growing Number of Working Parents: As more families find themselves in dual-income situations, there is a greater need for child day care services as parents look for dependable child care while they are at work.

Growing Understanding of Early Childhood Education: As early childhood education and development become more important, parents are enrolling their kids in childcare facilities that provide educational activities and programs.

This record contains the underlying research data for the publication "Efficient child care subsidies". We study the design of child care subsidies in an optimal welfare problem with heterogeneous private market productivities. The optimal subsidy schedule is qualitatively similar to the existing US scheme. Efficiency mandates a subsidy on formal child care costs, with higher subsidies paid to lower income earners and a kink as a function of child care expenditure. Marginal labor income tax rates are set lower than the labor wedges, with the potential to generate negative marginal tax rates. We calibrate our simple model to features of the US labor market and focus on single mothers with children aged below 6. The optimal program provides stronger participation but milder intensive margin incentives for low-income earners with subsidy rates starting very high and decreasing with income more steeply than those in the United States.

For a couple with 2 children, where one parent earned the average wage, and the other parent earned 67 percent of the average wage. The U.S. and Ireland had the most expensive childcare among OECD countries, with net childcare costs taking up ** and ** percent of net household income, respectively.

Because of the growing number of inhabitants under the age of six and increased employment, there is a growing demand for childcare services in Germany. Although there is, in principle, a legal entitlement to a childcare place for children under the age of three and children from the age of three until they start school, this cannot be fulfilled everywhere. In particular, childcare for children under the age of three has been massively expanded in recent years, but demand cannot currently be met. The centres' revenues are made up of public funds and parental contributions. The latter only make up a comparatively small proportion. In the period from 2019 to 2024, industry revenue grew by an average of 2.3% per year, meaning that it is likely to amount to €50.9 billion in the current year. Turnover in the sector is expected to increase by 0.2% compared to the previous year.One of the biggest challenges currently facing the sector is the shortage of skilled labour, which is expected to increase further in the coming years due to growing demand. The federal government is currently planning various measures to make the profession of educator more attractive. For example, school fees have already been abolished in some federal states. In addition, the federal government would like to use a pilot project to demonstrate to the federal states the advantages of abolishing school fees and offering remuneration during training. As part of the Daycare Centre Quality Act, the state is investing in the creation of equal living conditions for children growing up in Germany. Early childhood education projects in the areas of language, nutrition and exercise are to be established in daycare centres. While the declining number of residents under the age of six in the current year is likely to limit demand, the expected increase in the number of births will have a positive effect on demand in the future.In the period from 2024 to 2029, turnover in the sector is expected to increase by an average of 3.4% per year, reaching 60 billion euros in 2029. More and more parents are dependent on childcare places for their children in order to be able to reconcile family and work, which is leading to a sharp increase in demand. From 2026, children of primary school age will also have a legal entitlement to a childcare place after school. It remains to be seen to what extent the measures taken by the federal states will help to meet the massive demand for childcare.

This report analyses government funding for early childhood education, which can be delivered by a variety of licenced providers, including kindergartens, playcentres, Te Kura (the Correspondence School) and special needs services. Day care and child care services are not included. The data for this report is sourced from the Treasury (Te Tai Ohanga) and the Ministry of Education (Te Tahuhu o te Matauranga) and is measured in billions of dollars per financial year.

Over the last five years, the aging Baby Boomer generation, nearly one-fifth of the US population, has significantly boosted demand for adult day cares. Adult day cares have seen solid usage as improving life expectancies expands their primary client base. The industry's growing popularity as a low-cost alternative to nursing homes led to an influx of new providers, particularly among owner-operators offering at-home care. The rise of at-home adult day care services has perpetuated adult day care's fragmentation, allowing new providers to cater to underserved areas. Despite this growth, labor shortages force higher wages and compress profit. Adult day care providers' revenue has been climbing at a CAGR of 2.1% to an estimated $7.5 billion over the five years through 2024, including an expected rise of 1.3% in 2024 alone. Federal Medicaid funding has played a critical role in supporting adult day care providers. With over two-thirds of participants fully covered by Medicaid, increased funding has made adult day care services more accessible. However, potential legislative changes pose risks; Trump's return to the Oval Office will bring efforts to cut Medicaid funding and repeal the ACA. The reduction or disappearance of federal aid would cut off many's access to adult day care and significantly change the outlook for providers. In the next five years, a continued rise in the population's average age will bring stronger growth to adult day care services. Advances in medical technology and increasing life expectancy will sustain demand, boosting revenue as more older adults seek and maintain enrollment. The industry's growing popularity will intensify competition, prompting centers to enhance care quality to attract clients. Despite political adversity, Medicaid funding is still expected to rise, as well as maintaining service access. Specialization in centers focusing on specific medical conditions, along with the popularity of at-home care, will cater to unique client needs, further shaping the industry's future. Adult day care services' revenue is set to surge at a CAGR of 5.4% to $9.8 billion through the end of 2029.

The Household Market and Nonmarket Activities (HUS) project started as a joint research project between the Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research (IUI) and Göteborg University in 1980. The ambition was to build a consistent longitudinal micro data base on the use of time, money and public services of households. The first main survey was carried out in 1984. In addition to a contact interview with the selected individuals, all designated individuals participated in a personal interview and two telephone interviews. All respondents were asked about their family background, education, marital status, labor market experience, and employment. In addition, questions about the household were asked of the head of household, concerning family composition, child care, health status, housing, possession of vacation homes, cars, boats and other consumption durables. At the end of the personal interview the household head had to fill out a questionnaire including questions about financing of current home, construction costs for building a house, house value and loans, imputation of property values and loans, additions/renovations 1983, maintenance and repairs, leasing, sale of previous home, assets and liabilities, and non-taxable benefits. All the respondents had to fill out a questionnaire including questions about tax-return information 1983, employment income, and taxes and support payments. Two telephone interviews were used primarily to collect data on the household´s time use and consumption expenditures. The 1986 HUS-survey included both a follow-up of the 1984 sample (panel study) and a supplementary sample. The 1986 sample included 1) all respondents participating in the 1984 survey, 2) the household heads, partners and third persons who should have participated in 1984 but did not (1984 nonresponse), 3) those individuals who started living together after the 1984 interview with an selected individual who participated or was supposed to participate in 1984, 4) members of the 1984 household born in 1966 or 1967. If entering a new household, for example because of leaving their parental home, the household head and his/her partner were also interviewed. Respondents participating in the 1984 survey were interviewed by telephone in 1986. Questions dealt with changes in family composition, housing, employment, wages and child care, and it was not only recorded whether a change had occurred, and what sort of change, but also when it occurred. The respondents also received a questionnaire by mail with questions mainly concerning income and assets. Respondents not participating in the earlier survey were interviewed in person and were asked approximately the same questions as in the 1984 personal interview. The 1988 HUS-survey was considerably smaller than the previous ones. It was addressed exclusively to participants in the 1986 survey, and consisted of a self-enumerated questionnaire with a nonrespondent follow-up by telephone. The questions dealt with changes in housing conditions, employment and household composition. The questionnaire also contained some questions on household income. In many respect the 1991 HUS-survey replicated the 1988 survey. The questions were basically the same in content and range, and the survey was conducted as a self-enamurated questionnaire sent out by mail. This time, however, in contrast to the 1988 survey, an attempt was made to include in the survey the new household members who had moved into sample households since 1986, as well as young people who turned 18 after the 1986 survey. Earlier respondents received a questionnaire by mail containing questions about their home, their primary occupation and weekly work hours since May 1988 (event-history data), earnings in 1989, 1990 and 1991, household composition and any changes in it that might have occurred since 1988, child care and some questions on income. New respondents were also asked about their education and labor-market experience. With respect to its design and question wording, the 1993 survey is a new version of the 1986 survey. The survey is made up of four parts: 1) the panel survey, which was addressed mainly to respondents in the 1991 survey, with certain additions; 2) the so-called supplementary survey, which focused on a new random sample of individuals; 3) the so-called nonresponse survey, which encompassed respondents who had participated in at least one of the earlier surveys but had since dropped out; 4) the time-use survey, which included the same sample of respondents as those in the panel and supplementary surveys. Individuals in the nonresponse group were not included in the time-use survey. Most of the questions in the first three surveys were the same, but certain questions sequences were targeted to the respondents in a specific survey. Thus certain retrospective questions were asked of the nonresponse group, while specific questions on social background, labor market experience etc. were addressed to new respondents. In the case of respondents who had already participated in the panel, a combined contact and main interview was conducted by telephone, after which a self-enumerated questionnaire was sent out to each respondent by mail. The panel sample also included young people in panel households who were born in 1973 or 1974 as well as certain new household members who had not previously been interviewed. These individuals, like new respondents, were not interviewed by telephone until they had been interviewed personally. Thus technically they were treated in the same manner as individuals in the supplementary sample. The new supplementary sample was first contacted by telephone and then given a fairly lengthy personal interview, at the conclusion of which each respondent was asked to fill out a written questionnaire. In this respect the survey design for the nonresponse sample was the same as for the supplementary sample. The nonresponse sample also included young people born in 1973 or 1974 as well as certain new household members. The time-use interviews were conducted by telephone. For each respondent two days were chosen at random from the period from February 15, 1993 to February 14, 1994 and the respondents were interviewed about their time use during those two days. If possible, the time-use interviews were preceded by the other parts of the survey, but this was not always feasible. In each household the household head and spouse/partner were interviewed, as well as an additional person in certain households. Questions regarding the household as a whole were asked of only one person in the household, preferably the household head. As in earlier surveys, data from the interviews was subsequently supplemented by registry data, but only for those respondents who had given their express consent. There is registry information for 75-80 percent of the sample. The telephone interview is divided into following sections: administrative data; labor market experience; employment; job-seekers; not in labor force; education; family composition; child care; health status; other household members; housing conditions; vacation homes; and cars and boats. The questionnaire was divided into twelve sections: sale of previous home; acquisition of current home; construction costs for building a home; house value and loans; repairs; insurance; home-related expenses; sale of previous home; assets; household income; taxes; and respondent income 1992. The 1996 telephone interview is divided into following sections: administrative data; labor market experience; employment; job-seekers; not in labor force; education; family composition; child care; health status; other household members; housing conditions; vacation homes; cars and boats; and environment. The questionnaire was divided into twelve sections: sale of previous home; acquisition of current home; construction costs for building a home; house value and loans; repairs; insurance; home-related expenses; sale of previous home; assets; household income; taxes; and respondent income 1995. The 1998 telephone interview is divided into following sections: administrative data; labor market experience; employment; job-seekers; not in labor force; education; family composition; child care; health status; other household members; housing conditions; vacation homes; cars and boats; and municipal service. The questionnaire was divided into nine sections: sale of previous home; house value and loans; insurance; home-related expenses; assets; household income; inheritances and gifts; black-market work; and respondent income 1997.

The Household Market and Nonmarket Activities (HUS) project started as a joint research project between the Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research (IUI) and Göteborg University in 1980. The ambition was to build a consistent longitudinal micro data base on the use of time, money and public services of households. The first main survey was carried out in 1984. In addition to a contact interview with the selected individuals, all designated individuals participated in a personal interview and two telephone interviews. All respondents were asked about their family background, education, marital status, labor market experience, and employment. In addition, questions about the household were asked of the head of household, concerning family composition, child care, health status, housing, possession of vacation homes, cars, boats and other consumption durables. At the end of the personal interview the household head had to fill out a questionnaire including questions about financing of current home, construction costs for building a house, house value and loans, imputation of property values and loans, additions/renovations 1983, maintenance and repairs, leasing, sale of previous home, assets and liabilities, and non-taxable benefits. All the respondents had to fill out a questionnaire including questions about tax-return information 1983, employment income, and taxes and support payments. Two telephone interviews were used primarily to collect data on the household´s time use and consumption expenditures. The 1986 HUS-survey included both a follow-up of the 1984 sample (panel study) and a supplementary sample. The 1986 sample included 1) all respondents participating in the 1984 survey, 2) the household heads, partners and third persons who should have participated in 1984 but did not (1984 nonresponse), 3) those individuals who started living together after the 1984 interview with an selected individual who participated or was supposed to participate in 1984, 4) members of the 1984 household born in 1966 or 1967. If entering a new household, for example because of leaving their parental home, the household head and his/her partner were also interviewed. Respondents participating in the 1984 survey were interviewed by telephone in 1986. Questions dealt with changes in family composition, housing, employment, wages and child care, and it was not only recorded whether a change had occurred, and what sort of change, but also when it occurred. The respondents also received a questionnaire by mail with questions mainly concerning income and assets. Respondents not participating in the earlier survey were interviewed in person and were asked approximately the same questions as in the 1984 personal interview. The 1988 HUS-survey was considerably smaller than the previous ones. It was addressed exclusively to participants in the 1986 survey, and consisted of a self-enumerated questionnaire with a nonrespondent follow-up by telephone. The questions dealt with changes in housing conditions, employment and household composition. The questionnaire also contained some questions on household income. In many respect the 1991 HUS-survey replicated the 1988 survey. The questions were basically the same in content and range, and the survey was conducted as a self-enamurated questionnaire sent out by mail. This time, however, in contrast to the 1988 survey, an attempt was made to include in the survey the new household members who had moved into sample households since 1986, as well as young people who turned 18 after the 1986 survey. Earlier respondents received a questionnaire by mail containing questions about their home, their primary occupation and weekly work hours since May 1988 (event-history data), earnings in 1989, 1990 and 1991, household composition and any changes in it that might have occurred since 1988, child care and some questions on income. New respondents were also asked about their education and labor-market experience. With respect to its design and question wording, the 1993 survey is a new version of the 1986 survey. The survey is made up of four parts: 1) the panel survey, which was addressed mainly to respondents in the 1991 survey, with certain additions; 2) the so-called supplementary survey, which focused on a new random sample of individuals; 3) the so-called nonresponse survey, which encompassed respondents who had participated in at least one of the earlier surveys but had since dropped out; 4) the time-use survey, which included the same sample of respondents as those in the panel and supplementary surveys. Individuals in the nonresponse group were not included in the time-use survey. Most of the questions in the first three surveys were the same, but certain questions sequences were targeted to the respondents in a specific survey. Thus certain retrospective questions were asked of the nonresponse group, while specific questions on social background, labor market experience etc. were addressed to new respondents. In the case of respondents who had already participated in the panel, a combined contact and main interview was conducted by telephone, after which a self-enumerated questionnaire was sent out to each respondent by mail. The panel sample also included young people in panel households who were born in 1973 or 1974 as well as certain new household members who had not previously been interviewed. These individuals, like new respondents, were not interviewed by telephone until they had been interviewed personally. Thus technically they were treated in the same manner as individuals in the supplementary sample. The new supplementary sample was first contacted by telephone and then given a fairly lengthy personal interview, at the conclusion of which each respondent was asked to fill out a written questionnaire. In this respect the survey design for the nonresponse sample was the same as for the supplementary sample. The nonresponse sample also included young people born in 1973 or 1974 as well as certain new household members. The time-use interviews were conducted by telephone. For each respondent two days were chosen at random from the period from February 15, 1993 to February 14, 1994 and the respondents were interviewed about their time use during those two days. If possible, the time-use interviews were preceded by the other parts of the survey, but this was not always feasible. In each household the household head and spouse/partner were interviewed, as well as an additional person in certain households. Questions regarding the household as a whole were asked of only one person in the household, preferably the household head. As in earlier surveys, data from the interviews was subsequently supplemented by registry data, but only for those respondents who had given their express consent. There is registry information for 75-80 percent of the sample. The telephone interview is divided into following sections: administrative data; labor market experience; employment; job-seekers; not in labor force; education; family composition; child care; health status; other household members; housing conditions; vacation homes; and cars and boats. The questionnaire was divided into twelve sections: sale of previous home; acquisition of current home; construction costs for building a home; house value and loans; repairs; insurance; home-related expenses; sale of previous home; assets; household income; taxes; and respondent income 1992. The 1996 telephone interview is divided into following sections: administrative data; labor market experience; employment; job-seekers; not in labor force; education; family composition; child care; health status; other household members; housing conditions; vacation homes; cars and boats; and environment. The questionnaire was divided into twelve sections: sale of previous home; acquisition of current home; construction costs for building a home; house value and loans; repairs; insurance; home-related expenses; sale of previous home; assets; household income; taxes; and respondent income 1995. The 1998 telephone interview is divided into following sections: administrative data; labor market experience; employment; job-seekers; not in labor force; education; family composition; child care; health status; other household members; housing conditions; vacation homes; cars and boats; and municipal service. The questionnaire was divided into nine sections: sale of previous home; house value and loans; insurance; home-related expenses; assets; household income; inheritances and gifts; black-market work; and respondent income 1997.